Brendon O'Connell

Jewish Sex Suspect Protected By Prominent Melbourne Jews

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:15:00 +0000

Locksmith and security guard David Samuel Cyprys, 43, was yesterday charged with 16 counts of indecent assault and 13 counts of gross indecency claimed to have been committed between 1984 and 1991.

Prominent members of the Melbourne Jewish community lied to the police, covered up an alleged sex scandal and protected a man accused of repeatedly molesting children from a school in St Kilda East, a court has been told.

Locksmith and security guard David Samuel Cyprys, 43, was yesterday charged with 16 counts of indecent assault and 13 counts of gross indecency claimed to have been committed between 1984 and 1991.

Twelve alleged victims - who were aged between seven and 17 at the time the crimes are said to have occurred - knew Cyprys through Yeshivah College, where he worked as a security guard. Some also took karate lessons taught by Cyprys after school.
Advertisement: Story continues below

Detective Senior Constable Lisa Metcher said Cyprys was supported by ''high-standing members of the Jewish community'' who did not say anything when the alleged offending was canvassed. ''They failed to act in any way to protect children and the matter has been swept under the carpet,'' Senior Constable Metcher told Melbourne Magistrates Court.

Asked on what she based this, Senior Constable Metcher said: ''Based on the lies told to police and information that has been twisted and covered up.''

She said there was a high risk these supporters would help Cyprys flee the country if he was released on bail. Cyprys had told her he was ''unable to locate his passport''.

''The accused is still connected with people who would probably make it possible for him to leave the country if that was what was required for him to do,'' she said.

The court heard that five of the alleged victims were from Victoria and another five were from New South Wales. Police were travelling to the United States to obtain statements from another two.

Most of the alleged offences occurred in Melbourne, but some allegedly took place at Yeshivah school camps in NSW.

In 1992, Cyprys pleaded guilty to one count of indecent assault. He was fined $1500 but no conviction was recorded.

Senior Constable Metcher said the Moorabbin sexual offences taskforce was receiving between five and 10 phone calls a day in connection with the case and it was possible that publicity after the court case would generate more. ''We believe there are other victims and complainants that will come forward,'' she said. ''A lot of anonymous complainants are still deciding whether to come forward and make a statement.''

The court was also told of concerns that Cyprys lived with his 14-year-old son and spent time living with his new partner, who had three children aged four, eight and 13. ''These children have been subject to child protection notification,'' Senior Constable Metcher said.

The prosecution asked that any bail conditions ban Cyprys from unsupervised contact with any child under 16, including his own two children and three step-children.

However, defence lawyer Alex Lewenberg said a parent should not lose the right to have contact with their children unless the children were in danger.

''There is the entitlement of the child to see their parent. Whatever condition might be imposed we ask permission to facilitate continued contact with the son and daughter,'' Mr Lewenberg said.

He also opposed a surety being imposed as a bail condition, saying Cyprys had been ostracised in the community as a result of media coverage.

''His ability to secure surety is limited if non-existent,'' Mr Lewenberg said.

However, magistrate Luisa Bazzani said she would only grant Cyprys bail on the condition he pay a $50,000 surety to ensure his return to court.

She ordered him to report to police in St Kilda every day, not to contact any prosecution witnesses other than police and not to leave Victoria.

A further bail condition was that he have no contact with any child under 16 without exception unless supervised by child protection authorities.

This included contact with his children and the children of his partner. ''It is up to the Department of Human Services to nominate an appropriate supervisor,'' Ms Bazzani said.

Ms Bazzani said Cyprys would not be released on bail until he surrendered his passport and any other travel documents to police.

Cyprys was remanded to reappear on December 2.

Source: Sydney Morning Herald

The Flag And The Penis

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:38:00 +0000

The Daily Mail reported this week that young Paul Donnachie was found to have acted in a racially aggravated manner when he defiled an Israeli flag in a supposed political protest.

“A judge has ruled that a St Andrews University student who defiled an Israeli flag in a supposed political protest was acting in a racially aggravated manner. Donnachie, 19, put his hands down his trousers before he touched the flag belonging to Jewish exchange student Chanan Reitblat in what he claimed was a 'political statement'.”

Donnachie, will lose his place at St Andrews University with immediate effect. He is very unhappy with court’s decision.

The pathetic Scottish sheriff, who was booed loudly by pro-Palestine supporters, upheld the complaints, telling Donnachie: “I consider this to have been an act of malice against Mr Reitblat for his membership of Israel.

The judge had also refused defence solicitor Patrick Campbell to allow evidence from academic experts on whether the actions of Donnachie constituted an attack on the Israeli state as opposed to racism.

I am slightly perplexed here. What was the nature of Donnachie’s offence exactly? Was it the fact that Donnachie’s genital was not Jewish enough? Would it be different if Donnachie’s penis was circumcised by a Rabbi before the event? Would the judge react the same in case the Jewish Student Reitblat touched his penis before he touched, let’s say, an Iranian flag? Would it also constitute a ‘racist’ assault? I don’t think so.

The Scottish Judge should know that the Israeli flag is not a Jewish symbol. Zionism promised to transform the Jews into a nation. The Israeli flag, therefore, is clearly a national symbol.

For many of us, the blue & white flag stands for horrendous crimes against humanity, genocidal practices, white phosphorus, execution of peace activists in high seas and so on. For more and more people, Israelis are the Nazis of our time and showing contempt towards their national symbols is legitimate and doesn’t constitute any racial offence.

However, it is not a secret that many Jews around the world, including exchange student Chanan Reitblat, proactively identify spiritually and politically with the Israeli flag. This is indeed a problem since the blue & white flag is a symbol of some grave non-ethical behaviour. It is absolutely clear therefore that Donnachie’s protest was totally legitimate as long as Donnachie washes often enough and keeps his hygiene intact.

To Support Paul Donnachie on Facebook click here.

Source

Australia’s Repression Of BDS Movement Coordinated With Israel

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Sat, 13 Aug 2011 03:55:00 +0000

In the largest show of support for the Palestinian-initiated boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) campaign so far in Australia, more than 350 persons marched on 29 July in solidarity with the Palestinian struggle — and in opposition to an attempt by Victorian Police to criminalize Palestine solidarity activism in Melbourne.

A month earlier, on 1 July, a similar, peaceful BDS action involving 120 persons was brutally attacked by the Victorian Police. Nineteen individuals were arrested.

Charged with "trespassing" and "besetting," those arrested are now facing fines of up to AUD $30,000 (approximately US $32,300). The 1 July action, organized by the Coalition Against Israeli Apartheid, had sought to highlight the complicity of two Israeli companies, Jericho and Max Brenner Chocolate, with Israel’s occupation and apartheid policies. The action was the fourth protest against both companies since December 2010.

Jericho, located in Melbourne Central Shopping Centre and other shopping centers around the city, produces cosmetics made from minerals exploited from the Dead Sea. While Jericho and other Israeli companies — such as Ahava, also a target of BDS campaigns — profit from the Dead Sea, Palestinians are regularly denied access by Israel’s military checkpoints, exclusion zones and Israeli-only roads.

Max Brenner Chocolate, the other Israeli company subject to BDS protests in Melbourne, is owned by the Strauss Group — one of Israel’s largest food and beverage companies. On its website, the Strauss Group emphasizes its support for the Israeli military, providing care packages, sports and recreational equipment, books and games for soldiers.

Strauss boasts support for the Golani and Givati Brigades, which were heavily involved in Israel’s military assault on the Gaza Strip in the Winter of 2008-09, which resulted in the killing of approximately 1,400 Palestinians, the majority civilians, including approximately 350 children. While Strauss has removed information about their support for the Golani and Givati brigades from their English language website, information about the company’s support for both brigades remains on their Hebrew language site.

BDS repression coordinated with Israeli government

Trade union and community representatives spoke at the rally on 29 July before the crowd marched through the city. In spite of repeated threats of mass arrests by Victoria Police — and the deployment of police horses in one of the shopping centers — the protest marched into both the Melbourne Central and Queen Victoria centers, staging peaceful sit-ins in front of the Max Brenner stores located within.
Two day earlier, on 27 July, the Victorian police confirmed during a bail variation hearing at the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria (local District Court) for some of the activists arrested on 1 July that a decision had been made to arrest the protesters before the demonstration. This decision was made after discussions with Zionist organizations, the Victorian government, shopping center managements and state and national management of Max Brenner.

In April, the Australian Jewish News (AJN) reported that the Jewish Community Council of Victoria (JCCV) had made representations to the Victorian police. According to the AJN, JCCV president John Searle had "called on the police to stamp down harder on aggressive protesters" ("Police questioned as protests turn violent," 15 April 2011). Similar calls for a government and police crackdown on BDS protests against Max Brenner in Sydney were made in June by former AJN journalist Walt Secord, who is now a member of the NSW State Parliament ("Police called to action on BDS," 24 June 2011).

On July 29, the same day as the BDS action against Max Brenner in Melbourne the Australian Jewish News carried a "debate" piece between Vic Alhadeff, the CEO of the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies, and Ted Lapkin, a former staffer with the key pro-Israeli lobby group in Australia, the Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council. The piece reveals that the various calls for police and government crackdown on BDS activism was part of a "nationally coordinated strategy" developed with and backed by the Israeli Foreign Ministry ("BDS: To protest or not to protest?").

Arguing against any Zionist-organized BDS "counter" protest, Alhadeff writes: "It is important for the community to be aware that our response to BDS forms part of [a] coordinated national strategy. Furthermore, this strategy is endorsed by counterparts abroad and Israel’s Foreign Ministry."

Alhadeff outlined this coordinated national strategy in response to BDS, stating that it "included, but is not limited to, engagement with civil society and politicians, patronage of boycotted outlets, cooperation with police, shop owners and center managers and exposure of the motives behind the BDS movement." According to Alhadeff, Zionist policy in response to BDS should be one which seeks to "speak softly" but to also carry "a suggestion of a big stick."

Activism leadership targeted

During cross-examination by Robert Stary, the lawyer representing the activists, Michael Beattie, an operational support inspector with the the Victorian Police, conceded that both Melbourne Central and Queen Victoria shopping centers were "public places" and that neither center prior to 1 July had sought any civil injunctions to prevent entry to the public places inside.

The cross-examination by Stary also revealed that the main reason that police had decided to criminalize the actions against the Israeli companies was because they had been well-organized, coordinated and effective.

Victorian Police acknowledged that the demonstrations had been peaceful, that solidarity activists hadn’t damaged property and there was no record of police or any member of the public being injured.

According to the testimony given by Inspector Beattie, the police had specifically sought to target the leadership of the protests, in particular those activists the police perceived as "operating a command and control function," in order to diminish the possibility of well-coordinated demonstrations — and to ensure "no protesters go to property and disrupt targeted business or additional businesses."

According to Inspector Beattie, "the protesters had their own way" for too long and a "decision [was] made to draw a line in the sand and make arrests." Another police officer, Senior Sargent Andrew Falconer, also gave testimony at the court hearing and acknowledged that police infiltrators had been sent to pro-Palestine solidarity meetings in order to monitor the activity of BDS activists.

In a statement issued after their arrests, the nineteen activists noted that "the attack on the peaceful BDS action in Melbourne highlights increasing attempts to criminalize BDS and Palestine solidarity activism internationally. Currently in the US, France and Greece, hundreds of pro-Palestine activists are facing criminal charges for nonviolently standing up for Palestinian human rights" ("Support the Boycott Israel 19 Defence Campaign").

James Crafti, one of the activists arrested, told The Electronic Intifada that "the attempt by Israel and governments around the world to criminalize pro-Palestinian and BDS activism ignores the fact that the real criminal activity is being carried out by the Israeli state."

"Since its founding in 1948, Israel has sought to ethnically cleanse the indigenous Palestinian people through war, occupation and apartheid practices. Israel regularly engages in collective punishment, arbitrary arrests, extra-judicial assassinations and the demolition of Palestinian homes and civil infrastructure, all of which are illegal under international law," he added.

Crafti noted that while the Victorian and Australian governments sought to criminalize support for Palestine self-determination, they refused to hold Israel accountable for its human rights abuses, war crimes and apartheid policies.

All of the arrested activists who spoke to The Electronic Intifada said the police attack on the protest also highlighted the increasing repression of civil liberties and freedom of speech by the Victorian (conservative) Baillieu government.

One Palestine solidarity activist, Sue Bolton, who has been charged with "besetting" (obstructing or hindering the right to enter, use or leave a premise), asserted that the police reaction to the action on 1 July was "over the top."

"There were massive numbers of police, well over a hundred, not counting those behind the scenes in the loading docks," she said.

According to Bolton, the Queen Victoria Centre loading docks had been cleared of delivery trucks, allowing the police to set up a processing unit and bring in prison transport trucks to be used as holding cells for those arrested.

Bolton described how police had sought to "kettle" the demonstration by corralling protesters and physically pushing them into a smaller and smaller area. According to Bolton, this resulted in a number of protesters being injured and crushed when the police had surrounded and violently pushed protesters from all sides.

Similar tactics have been used by police forces in Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Finland and Denmark. The use of kettling by police in the UK against student protesters in November 2010 has led to legal challenges and the calling for a ban on the use of the tactic in the British High Court and the European Court of Human Rights.

Damian Ridgwell, another Palestine solidarity protester arrested on 1 July, told The Electronic Intifada that he had been standing away from the peaceful picket, speaking on a megaphone when three policemen grabbed him.

"I was dragged behind police lines," Ridgwell said. "Once they grabbed me and started dragging me, I went limp and dropped to the ground … As I was being carried through the corridors of the loading dock, I lost consciousness because one of the police had me in a choke hold. I am not sure how long I was out, probably a few minutes. I woke up on the loading dock floor and heard the police saying I was 'out.’"

Ridgwell, who was charged with trespassing, said "while it is outrageous we were arrested for peacefully demonstrating, our arrests have to be seen in the context of the Australia government’s support for Israel and its continued theft of Palestinian land … it’s important we don’t let the police intimidate protests like this. It is important to keep going with the protests and to keep supporting BDS."

Australian government’s support of Israeli apartheid

Successive Australian governments, including the current Gillard government, have long supported Israel’s colonial and apartheid policies.

Current Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard signaled her uncritical support for Israel when she was still deputy Prime Minster of Australia. During the early days of Israel’s bombing of Gaza in the winter of 2008-09, she blamed Palestinians for Israel’s all-out assault, saying that Hamas must "renounce violence" and that Israel had the "right to defend itself."

During a visit to Israel In 2009, Gillard was thanked by Israeli government minister Isaac Herzog for standing "almost alone on the world stage in support of Israel’s right to defend itself" ("Israel to Gillard: thanks for standing by us," The Age, 24 June 2009).

The arrested activists noted that in June, the Baillieu government had established a new 42-member riot squad — and the attack on the 1 July protest was the first time it had been used in any significant way.

According to James Crafti, "the Victorian government thinks it can easily get away with attacking a pro-Palestine action because they think they can label us anti-Semitic." Crafti, who is Jewish, said that the police and those opposed to the BDS actions, however, "underestimate the sympathy towards both Palestine and the [Palestine solidarity] movement in the broader community."

"The amount of force used by the police and the response of the political elite to our protests, particularly the fact that the Australian Foreign Minister [and former Australian Prime Minister] Kevin Rudd felt the need to go a few days after our protest to Max Brenner as a public relations stunt is a sign of the pro-Israeli forces’ desperation," he added.

The eleven activists succeeded in changing the original bail conditions preventing them from entering either shopping center (which also host medical clinics and a major train station) until the end of their case, to a lesser restriction of being prohibited from being within fifty meters of Max Brenner in both centers. However, Stary said he was still "anxious about the criminalization of dissent."

"The police should not be used to protect the interests of an international commercial company," he said.

Building on the success of 29 July, Melbourne activists will continue to campaign in support of Palestinian rights and oppose the criminalization of Palestine solidarity activism. The next Melbourne BDS action is scheduled for 9 September, the same week those arrested will plead not guilty to the charges against them. The defense campaign in support of the arrested activists has gained wide attention, with well-known public figures such as filmmaker John Pilger, author Norman Finkelstein and radical thinker Noam Chomsky supporting the campaign.

In a media release issued immediately following the success of the 29 July BDS action, Melbourne activists said the Victorian Police "thought that by attacking the BDS demonstration they would put an end to our movement. They were wrong … [we will] not be silenced" ("BDS returns to Max Brenner in spite of police intimidation," 5 August 2011).

Kim Bullimore has lived and worked in the West Bank of the Occupied Palestinian Territories. She is a member of the Melbourne Coalition Against Israeli Apartheid and a co-organizer of the first national Australian BDS conference, which took place in Melbourne in October 2010. Kim writes regularly on the Palestine-Israel conflict for the Australian newspaper, Direct Action. She has a blog at livefromoccupiedpalestine.blogspot.com.

I Believe in the Holocaust

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:34:00 +0000

The Holocaust: A Student's Guide

Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax

Exposing the Holocaust™ Hoax

The Holocaust Hoax

The Holohoax - "Holocaust" Hoax

The "Six Million" Myth

A Revisionist Response To The Pro-Jewish Distortions Of Anthony J. Hall And Joshua Blakeney

Holocaust Denial Videos

Anti-Semite? What About Anti-Goyimite?

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:45:00 +0000

Introducing The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism

By Michael Hoffman

www.revisionisthistory.org

"A dreamer is one who can only find his way by moonlight, and his punishment is that he sees the dawn before the rest of the world." Oscar Wilde

Perhaps some of you have wondered about the debut of The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism and desire more details concerning it.

It bears mentioning that The Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of AntiSemitism (http://sicsa.huji.ac.il/) was established "as an interdisciplinary research center dedicated to accumulation and dissemination of knowledge necessary for understanding the phenomenon of antisemitism. The Center engages in research on antisemitism throughout the ages, focusing on relations between Jews and non-Jews, particularly in situations of tension and crisis."

The Center is based at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and funded in part by the multi-millionaire cosmetics' baron Vidal Sassoon, CBE (Commander of the Order of the British Empire).

The purpose of the Sassoon Center is two-fold: to gather active intelligence on the movements and personnel around the world stigmatized as "antisemitic," and to paralyze any leader or movement that exposes Judaism, Talmudism or the Israeli state by tarring them with the career-ending "antisemitic" label.

Turning the Tables

I have never been interested in being confined to a category or placed on the defensive. As far as categories go, I have always sought to turn the tables by thinking completely outside the box and crafting a new epistemology. Toward that end I coined the term "Judaic" to replace the appellation "Jew" as a description of rabbis and Zionists who lay claim to an awe-inspiring self-description with little or no evidence to substantiate their presumption.

Judaism offers race-based divinity to those of whom it is said are the descendants of the Old Testament patriarchs. We see echoes of this in Judeo-Churchianity, where the insinuation that “Jews” are saved by their racial prestige is a powerful undercurrent.

What salvation is there for impostors, however? For those who reject Jesus Christ and think they are Jews, but in genetic reality they are not Jews? (Rev. 2:9; 3:9). This dilemma is almost never considered. There is a snare wrapped within it – the huge superstructure of fraud, demonic pride and misdirection built upon the notion that many or most of the followers of the religion of Judaism and the inhabitants of the Israeli state, are “Jews” descended from Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and thereby saved, or at the very least, ennobled, by virtue of their supposedly exalted genealogy, and entitled to certain immunities and prerogatives.

There was a quasi-magical awe in which self-described “Jews” were viewed in medieval Europe, one of the few “Ace” cards they held at that time, and one which they exploited masterfully and to great effect, no less than now among the Republican Right wing. The whole thing is as absurd as a band of Calabrians in Italy claiming to be owed deference, or rulership over Rome, because they insist they are genetic descendants of the Caesars.

Why do we take anything the rabbis and their cronies say at face value, absent collaborating data? We can talk about this until we are blue in the face or we can act to withdraw the mechanism whereby this fraud is maintained and substitute the word Judaic for the word Jew. In addition to being a dispassionate, generic description of those who have an ethnic attachment to renascent Phariseeism ("Orthodox Judaism"), and Zionism, "Judaic" disarms the familiar accusation of Jew hate and the special aura of victimhood surrounding that term, which is mined to maximum effect by those who claim its mantle.

Not everyone agrees with my strategy and this is to be expected. Anything new is often attacked and can make those who are stuck in a rut very uncomfortable. They are accustomed to their rut, it is cozy and familiar. They cannot envision a significant advance unless it involves the coming to power of a charismatic national leader of their persuasion. If that scenario isn't realized, they are stranded in limbo while the enemies of truth take command.

To what extent are antisemitism accusations a mask for anti-goyimism?

The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism approaches these problems in an entirely new way. First, the Center directs a vigorous offense, rather than a retreating defense. Second, it possesses the energy of an original idea made concrete: how do we account for Judaism's hatred for the goyim (i.e. the non-Judaic nations)? How does this hatred manifest in politics, society, culture, education, business and world affairs?

The Hoffman Center studies a pivotal question: to what extent are antisemitism accusations a mask for anti-goyimism?

In playwright David Mamet's new book announcing his conversion to the Right wing, The Secret Knowledge: On the Dismantling of American Culture (http://t.co/2GK08VE), the English people are besmirched as possessing an almost genetic strain of antisemitism. Years ago, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir declared that Polish people imbibe antisemitism in their mother's breast milk. These hateful characterizations of the English and the Poles reflect the general contempt and bigotry of the Gemara, Mishnah Torah, Shulchan Aruch and Mishnah Berurah for the goyim, yet they are put forth and gain legitimacy as part of an alleged fight against bigotry.

The Hoffman Center aims to expose this hoodwink with facts and documents, not just generalized rhetoric about the Talmud. When the Hoffman Center states that the rabbinic texts teach that goyim are lower than dogs, we will prove our contention chapter and verse. Of course it will be said that we took the texts "out of context." We are prepared to deflate that Pavlovian defense and show with massive documentation that goyim have a status beneath that of dogs in Orthodox Judaism -- and that's far from the only racist dehumanization to which goyim are subjected in the holy books of Chazal (the founding "sages" of Judaism).

Here is the one-way prerogative of the Talmudic mentality: entitlement to bash our eminent authors with the "anti-semite" cudgel, while we respond on the defensive. Our defensive response has been a failure. I'm sick of failure!

Anthony Julius was Deborah Lipstadt's lawyer in historian David Irving's libel suit against her. Mr. Julius is the author of a recent book, Trials of the Diaspora: A History of Anti-Semitism (http://tinyurl.com/3u6qp2l). In its pages he defames Chaucer, Shakespeare and Dickens, among others. His book was reviewed with fulsome praise by the Yale University literary critic Harold Bloom, who wrote: "Julius links anti-Semitism to sadism. He might have done even more with this, since sado-masochism is something of an English vice, and is so much a school-experience of the upper social class."

An English vice. To say that Shylock's usury or Fagin's fencing of stolen goods are "Judaic vices" is nothing less than rabid Shakespearean and Dickensian antisemitism according to Julius, yet Bloom feels entitled to stigmatize the English as sadomasochist, as a nation which derives pleasure from extreme cruelty.

As one of the Holy People, Mr. Bloom can libel the English nation with impunity, while the profound insights of Chaucer, Shakespeare and Dickens constitute an "immemorial stench" (Bloom), out of a "sewer" (Julius).

In his chapter on "The Mentality of Modern English Anti-Semitism," Mr. Julius presents what Prof. Bloom terms, "the puzzle of what appears to be an incessant prejudice, never to be dispelled."

The concept of goyim harboring never-to-be-dispelled prejudice toward Judaics is a troglodyte dogma taught to bochurim (yeshiva boys). They are indoctrinated from an early age to believe that any opposition to the religion of Judaism is irrational (based on no legitimate grievance) and ineradicable, the assumption being that all opposition to Judaism reflects a hereditary gentile predisposition toward hatred of the Holy People.

This traditional rabbinic brainwash is expressed as follows: "Halacha hi beyoduah she'Eisav soneh l'Yaakov" ("It is a given law: it is known that Esau hates Jacob;" cf. Judaism Discovered, pp. 463-466).

Despite their morally superior liberal pretensions, Julius and Bloom are steeped in 2,000 years of Talmudic anti-gentile darkness.

The purpose of The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism is to elucidate this stream in western académe and media and track the tail of the serpent of hatred and prejudice to its clandestine root in Judaism.

Resources

Personnel: one (so far).

Resources: letterhead printed with the name The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism.

That's it, for now, at least in material terms.

I can dream, can't I?

The Vision

Our starting point: planting the seed of this vision.

At present, to be honest, there is little chance that my Center will become a brick and mortar institute in the near future, yet I didn't want to live my life without at least sowing in as many minds as I could, this idea whose time has come; one that has incubated in my soul for many years.

So there you have it: merely a letterhead entity envisioned by a dreamer.

Someday, perhaps sooner rather than later, God will see fit to attract support for this dream. If not in my lifetime then in that of the next generation, this Center will become a truly realized venture -- the axis upon which the most virulent racism that ever arose in the annals of time, will finally have its human rights mask torn away, heralding a new birth of freedom for the people of the West.

Israel Loves You

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:23:00 +0000

Posted for the benefit of the jury who convicted Brendon O'Connell.

Dual Citizenship - Loyal To Whom?

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:17:00 +0000

By Dan Eden

Someone wrote and asked me, "Why are there Israeli- but not Mexican-American Dual Nationals?"

Well, here's my take on this. I'd also like your views and opinions.

Before I begin I'd like to day something important. There is a new law -- the so-called "Hate Speech" law, that just passed the House and is expected to pass the Senate and become law very soon. It was originally designed to guard against discrimination of oppressed minorities but was soon recognized as a way for Israel to forever end any criticism of the state of Israel and Zionism. When it is law, this page, and many like it will be deleted from the internet as yet another mile marker of the infringement of truth and free speech by certain dual-nationals at the expense of true and patriotic Americans. Enough said.

Unless we are Native American Indians, all Americans have their origins in some other country. Both of my parents were from England. They were proud to be "British" but they were most proud of achieving their American citizenship. Sure, we had pictures of the Queen and nick-nacks with the Union Jack on them. My mother even celebrated the traditional 4 o'clock tea time and was good at making Yorkshire Pudding. In the late 60's my older brother served in the US Army and did his tour in Viet Nam. When it came down to "allegiance," we were all patriotic Americans. Period.

The word "allegiance" means that we promise loyalty. It also carries with it the expectation that this loyalty will be exclusive and unrestrained. In the case of a declared war or real threat or conflict, for example, our allegiance to America should preclude any other interest, be it another country or political ideology.

When they took their oath to become American citizens, my parents had to pledge their "allegiance" exclusively to America and renounce their allegiance to "any and all foreign governments." That included Great Britain, one of our strongest allies.

Before Viewzone asked me to research the meaning of "dual citizenship," I had never heard of the term. How could someone be a citizen of two countries at the same time? But I was just ignorant. Dual nationalities and citizenships are quite common.

From my internet research, I learned that in 1997, a French Canadian with a U.S. passport ran for mayor of Plattsburgh, N.Y. He argued that the incumbent spoke French too poorly to be running a city so close to Quebec. He lost. Also in 1997, a retired top American official for the U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) ran for president of Lithuania. He was inaugurated in February to a burst of fireworks!

In 1996, Dominicans from New York not only could vote in the Dominican Republic's presidential elections for the first time, they could vote for a fellow New Yorker. Multiple nationalities have become so commonplace that some analysts fear the trend is undermining the notion of nationhood, particularly in the place with the most diverse citizenry on Earth: the United States.

Debate over the issue intensified in the late 1990s, when Mexico joined the growing list of poor nations that say it's OK for their nationals to be citizens of the countries to which they have migrated. Under the law that took effect in 1998 Mexicans abroad -- most of them in the United States -- will be able to retain Mexican citizenship even if they seek U.S. citizenship. And naturalized Americans of Mexican descent will be able to reclaim their original citizenship. The Mexican government stopped short, for now, of giving expatriates the right to vote.

Security Issues

Since citizenship carries with it a responsibility to be exclusively loyal to one country, the whole concept of dual citizenship and nationality raises questions about which of the dual citizenships have priority. This is extremely important when the two countries have opposing interests. It can be a deadly problem when a dual citizen is in a high position within our American government.

Can one imagine a Japanese citizen serving in the Pentagon during WWII? Or how about a citizen of the Soviet Union holding a cabinet position in the White House during the Cold War?

Today's conflicts are centered in the Middle East. America needs to balance foreign policies towards oil producing Arab nations with our goal being peace and stability in the region. This places a burdon on our government to be even-handed in our dealings with the Arab world and Israel. While the Iraq War was waged on lies about Weapons of Mass Destruction and revenge for 911, the real reason has emerged as a well designed global plan to improve the power and leverage of Israel. Added to this policy is yet another potential blow to American interests and security -- the impending War with Iran. This war will be waged for the security of Israel and will be paid for by the blood of American soldiers and the hard-earned money of American citizens whose quality of life is inversely tied to the cost of petroleum.

Recently, in their much lauded paper, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, Harvard professor, Stephen Walt, and University of Chicago professor, John Mearsheimer, focused attention on the strong Israeli lobby which has a powerful influence over American foreign policies (see BBC article). They detail the influence that this lobby has exerted, forming a series of international policies which can be viewed as in direct opposition to the interests and security of the American people. These acts and policies are more often than not carried out by US government appointees who hold powerful positions and who are dual American-Israeli citizens. Since the policies they support are often exclusively beneficial to Israel, often to the detriment of America, it has been argued that their loyalties are misdirected.

A few classic examples can be cited here.

Jonathan Jay Pollard [right] was an American-Israeli citizen who worked for the US government. He is well known because he stole more secrets from the U.S. than has any other spy in American history. During his interrogation Pollard said he felt compelled to put the "interests of my state" ahead of his own. Although as a U.S. Navy counter-intelligence specialist he had a top-secret security clearance, by "my state" he meant the state of Israel.

Literally tens of thousands of Americans holding U.S. passports admit they feel a primary allegiance to the state of Israel. In many instances, these Americans vote in Israeli elections, wear Israeli uniforms and fight in Israeli wars. Many are actively engaged both in the confiscation of Palestinian lands and in the Israeli political system. Three examples come to mind:

One is Rabbi Meir Kahane, who founded the militant Jewish Defense League in the U.S. in the 1960s, then emigrated to Israel where, eventually, he was elected to the Knesset. Until he was shot and killed at one of his U.S. fund-raising rallies in 1990, the Brooklyn-born rabbi shuttled between Tel Aviv and New York, where he recruited militant American Jews for his activities in Israel against Palestinians. He claimed to be a "dual citizen" of America and Israel.

Another Jewish American, James Mahon from Alexandria, Virginia, reportedly was on a secret mission to kill PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat when he was shot in 1980 by an unknown assailant. When he was shot, Mahon held an American M-16 in his hand and a U.S. passport in his pocket.

Then there was Alan Harry Goodman, an American Jew who left his home in Baltimore, Maryland, flew to Israel and served in the Israeli army. Then, on April 11, 1982, armed with an Uzi submachine gun, he walked, alone, to Al-Aqsa, Jerusalem's most holy Islamic shrine, where he opened fire, killing two Palestinians and wounding others. Both the U.S. and Israeli governments played down the incident, as did the media.

Most recently, US Navy Petty Officer, Ariel J. Weinmann, while serving at or near Bahrain, Mexico, and Austria, "with intent or reason to believe it would be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation (Israel), [attempted] to communicate, deliver or transmit classified CONFIDENTIAL and SECRET information relating to the national defense, to a representative, officer, agent or employee of a foreign government." Weinmann was apprehended on March 26 after being listed as "a deserter by his command," according to the US Navy. The information he gathered was supplied to Israel.

Ben-Ami Kadish, a Connecticut-born U.S. dual citizen who worked in New Jersey was arrested and charged with giving top secret nuclear information and details about the US Patriot Missile to an Israeli agent -- the same agent involved with the Jay Pollard case. The espionage charges reportedly stem from acts committed in the 1980s. These activities, like the ones with convicted spy Pollard, were immediately denied by Israel (Pollard pleaded guilty in 1986). It is further reported that Israeli officials instructed Kadish to lie to US investigators. Kadish was scheduled to be arraigned on April 22, 2008 at U.S. District Court in Manhattan.

In 2009 it was revealed that the NSA had secretly taped conversations of Congresswomen Jane Harman [pictured above on the right with Israeli Knesset Speaker, Dalia Itzik] negotiating with two AIPAC spies accused of giving sensitive information about US military activities to the Israeli government. In the taped conversation she is being asked to dismiss their espionage charges in return for large political contributions and (are you ready) a chairmanship of the US Intelligence Committee! One has to assume that they thought they could actually "arrange" for this to happen. This information was secretly revealed by the NSA to Nancy Polosi prior to the selection of the committee chairman and was a factor (let's hope, anyway) in Harmon's failure to obtain this highly sensitive position. After all was said and done, however, the case against the two Israeli lobbyists was dismissed -- against the insistence of the FBI. No satisfactory reason has been given for this.

Unfortunately, such an act of treason remains unchallenged and Jane Harman remains at her congressional job and enjoys being the third wealthiest member of Congress. Only in America!

The examples of Kahane, Mahonm, Goodman and Weinmann raise the question of when a U.S. citizen ceases to be, or should cease to be, a U.S. citizen. U.S. Law at one time clearly stated that an American citizen owed first allegiance to the United States. A U.S. citizen should not fight in a foreign army or hold high office in a foreign country without risking expatriation. What the heck happened?

The 1940 Nationality Act

Section 401 (e) of the 1940 Nationality Act provides that a U.S. citizen, whether by birth or naturalization, "shall lose his [U.S.] nationality by...voting in a political election in a foreign state."

This law was tested many times. In 1958, for instance, an American citizen named Perez voted in a Mexican election. The case went to the Supreme Court, where the majority opinion held that Perez must lose his American nationality. The court said Congress could provide for expatriation as a reasonable way of preventing embarrassment to the United States in its foreign relations.

But then something very odd happened.

In 1967 an American Jew, Beys Afroyim received an exemption that set a precedent exclusively for American Jews. Afroyim, born in Poland in 1895, emigrated to America in 1912, and became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1926. In 1950, aged 55, he emigrated to Israel and became an Israeli citizen. In 1951 Afroyim voted in an Israeli Knesset election and in five political elections that followed. So, by all standards he lost his American citizenship -- right? Wrong.

After living in Israel for a decade, Afroyim wished to return to New York. In 1960, he asked the U.S. Consulate in Haifa for an American passport. The Department of State refused the application, invoking section 401 (e) of the Nationality Act -- the same ruling that had stripped the American citizen named Perez of his U.S. citizenship.

Attorneys acting for Afroyim took his case to a Washington, DC District Court, which upheld the law. Then his attorneys appealed to the Court of Appeals. This court also upheld the law. The attorneys for Afroyim then moved the case on to the Supreme Court. Here, with Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas, Lyndon Johnson's former attorney and one of the most powerful Jewish Americans, casting the swing vote, the court voted five to four in favor of Afroyim. The court held that the U.S. government had no right to "rob" Afroyim of his American citizenship!

The court, reversing its previous judgment as regards the Mexican American, ruled that Afroyim had not shown "intent" to lose citizenship by voting in Israeli elections. Huh?

While Washington claims it has a "good neighbor" policy with Mexico, the U.S. does not permit Mexicans to hold dual nationality. The US makes them become either U.S. or Mexican -- you can't be both. But the U.S., in its special relationship with Israel, has become very sympathetic to allowing Israeli-Americans to retain two nationalities and allowing U.S. citizens not only to hold public office in Israel, but to hold US government positions as well! No other country holds this special exception to our laws of citizenship.

So, you might ask, are there any other dual Israel-American citizens who hold US government positions that could compromise American security? Yes. Consider the following list that I obtained on the web:

Michael Mukasey

Recently appointed as US Attorney General. Mukasey also was the judge in the litigation between developer Larry Silverstein and several insurance companies arising from the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001.

Michael Chertoff

Former Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, at the Justice Department; now head of Homeland Security.

Richard Perle

One of Bush's foreign policy advisors, he is the chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board. A very likely Israeli government agent, Perle was expelled from Senator Henry Jackson's office in the 1970's after the National Security Agency (NSA) caught him passing Highly-Classified (National Security) documents to the Israeli Embassy. He later worked for the Israeli weapons firm, Soltam. Perle came from one the above mentioned pro-Israel think-tanks, the AEI. Perle is one of the leading pro-Israeli fanatics leading this Iraq war mongering within the administration and now in the media.

Paul Wolfowitz

Former Deputy Defense Secretary, and member of Perle's Defense Policy Board, in the Pentagon. Wolfowitz is a close associate of Perle, and reportedly has close ties to the Israeli military. His sister lives in Israel. Wolfowitz came from the above mentioned Jewish thinktank, JINSA. Wolfowitz was the number two leader within the administration behind this Iraq war mongering. He later was appointed head of the World Bank but resigned under pressure from World Bank members over a scandal involving his misuse of power.

Lawrence (Larry) Franklin

The former Defense Intelligence Agency analyst with expertise in Iranian policy issues who worked in the office of Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith and reported directly to Feith's deputy, William Luti, was sentenced January 20, 2006, "to more than 12 years in prison for giving classified information to an Israeli diplomat" and members of the pro-Israel lobbying group American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

Franklin will "remain free while the government continues with the wider case" and his "prison time could be sharply reduced in return for his help in prosecuting" former AIPAC members Steven J. Rosen and Keith Weissman, [who] are scheduled to go on trial in April [2006]. Franklin admitted that he met periodically with Rosen and Weissman between 2002 and 2004 and discussed classified information, including information about potential attacks on U.S. troops in Iraq. Rosen and Weissman would later share what they learned with reporters and Israeli officials." (source: sourcewatch.com).

Douglas Feith

Under Secretary of Defense and Policy Advisor at the Pentagon. He is a close associate of Perle and served as his Special Counsel. Like Perle and the others, Feith is a pro-Israel extremist, who has advocated anti-Arab policies in the past. He is closely associated with the extremist group, the Zionist Organization of America, which even attacks Jews that don't agree with its extremist views. Feith frequently speaks at ZOA conferences. Feith runs a small law firm, Feith and Zell, which only has one International office, in Israel. The majority of their legal work is representing Israeli interests. His firm's own website stated, prior to his appointment, that Feith "represents Israeli Armaments Manufacturer." Feith basically represents the Israeli War Machine. Feith also came from the Jewish thinktank JINSA. Feith, like Perle and Wolfowitz, are campaigning hard for this Israeli proxy war against Iraq.

Feith was investigated by the FBI under suspicion of leaking classified information to Israel, being that he was Larry Franklin's boss when Franklin leaked those documents to Rosen and Weissman of AIPAC. For that he was forced to leave the National Security Council. Feith was also investigated by the Senate Intelligence Committee for sexing up 'intelligence' that was used to justify invading Iraq.

Edward Luttwak

Member of the National Security Study Group of the Department of Defence at the Pentagon. Luttwak is reportedly an Israeli citizen and has taught in Israel. He frequently writes for Israeli and pro-Israeli newspapers and journals. Luttwak is an Israeli extremist whose main theme in many of his articles is the necessity of the U.S. waging war against Iraq and Iran.

Henry Kissinger

One of many Pentagon Advisors, Kissinger sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle. For detailed information about Kissinger's evil past, read Seymour Hersch's book (Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White House). Kissinger likely had a part in the Watergate crimes, Southeast Asia mass murders (Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos), Installing Chilean mass murdering dictator Pinochet, Operation Condor's mass killings in South America, and more recently served as Serbia's Ex-Dictator Slobodan Milosevic's Advisor. He consistently advocated going to war against Iraq. Kissinger is the Ariel Sharon of the U.S. Unfortunately, President Bush nominated Kissinger as chairman of the September 11 investigating commission. It's like picking a bank robber to investigate a fraud scandal. He later declined this job under enormous protests.

Dov Zakheim

Dov Zakheim is an ordained rabbi and reportedly holds Israeli citizenship. Zakheim attended Jew's College in London and became an ordained Orthodox Jewish Rabbi in 1973. He was adjunct professor at New York's Jewish Yeshiva University. Zakheim is close to the Israeli lobby.

Dov Zakheim is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and in 2000 a co-author of the Project for the New American Century's position paper, Rebuilding America's Defenses, advocating the necessity for a Pearl-Harbor-like incident to mobilize the country into war with its enemies, mostly Middle Eastern Muslim nations.

He was appointed by Bush as Pentagon Comptroller from May 4, 2001 to March 10, 2004. At that time he was unable to explain the disappearance of $1 trillion dollars. Actually, nearly three years earlier, Donald Rumsfeld announced on September 10, 2001 that an audit discovered $2.3 trillion was also missing from the Pentagon books. That story, as mentioned, was buried under 9-11's rubble. The two sums disappeared on Zakheim's watch. We can only guess where that cash went.

Despite these suspicions, on May 6, 2004, Zakheim took a lucrative position at Booz Allen Hamilton, one of the most prestigious strategy consulting firms in the world. One of its clients then was Blessed Relief, a charity said to be a front for Osama bin Laden. Booz, Allen & Hamilton then also worked closely with DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is the research arm of the Department of Defense.

Judicial Inc's bio of Dov tells us Zakheim is a dual Israeli/American citizen and has been tracking the halls of US government for 25 years, casting defense policy and influence on Presidents Reagan, Clinton, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. Judicial Inc points out that most of Israel's armaments were gotten thanks to him. Squads of US F-16 and F-15 were classified military surplus and sold to Israel at a fraction of their value.

Kenneth Adelman

One of many Pentagon Advisors, Adelman also sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle, and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor, who supported going to war against Iraq. Adelman frequently is a guest on Fox News, and often expresses extremist and often ridiculus anti-Arab and anti-Muslim views. Through his racism or ignorance, he actually called Arabs "anti-Semitic" on Fox News (11/28/2001), when he could have looked it up in the dictionary to find out that Arabs by definition are Semites.

I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby
Vice President Dick Cheney's ex-Chief of Staff. As chief pro-Israel Jewish advisor to Cheney, it helps explains why Cheney is so gun-ho to invade Iran. Libby is longtime associate of Wolfowitz. Libby was also a lawyer for convicted felon and Israeli spy Marc Rich, whom Clinton pardoned, in his last days as president. Libby was recently found guilty of lying to Federal investigators in the Valerie Plame affair, in which Plame, a covert CIA agent, was exposed for political revenge by the Bush administration following her husband's revelations about the lies leading to the Iraq War.

Robert Satloff
U.S. National Security Council Advisor, Satloff was the executive director of the Israeli lobby's "think tank," Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Many of the Israeli lobby's "experts" come from this front group, like Martin Indyk.

Elliott Abrams
National Security Council Advisor. He previously worked at Washington-based "Think Tank" Ethics and Public Policy Center. During the Reagan Adminstration, Abrams was the Assistant Secretary of State, handling, for the most part, Latin American affairs. He played an important role in the Iran-Contra Scandal, which involved illegally selling U.S. weapons to Iran to fight Iraq, and illegally funding the contra rebels fighting to overthrow Nicaragua's Sandinista government. He also actively deceived three congressional committees about his involvement and thereby faced felony charges based on his testimony. Abrams pled guilty in 1991 to two misdemeanors and was sentenced to a year's probation and 100 hours of community service. A year later, former President Bush (Senior) granted Abrams a full pardon. He was one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the Reagan Administration's State Department.

Marc Grossman
Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. He was Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human Resources at the Department of State. Grossman is one of many of the pro-Israel Jewish officials from the Clinton Administration that Bush has promoted to higher posts.

Richard Haas
Director of Policy Planning at the State Department and Ambassador at large. He is also Director of National Security Programs and Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). He was one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the first Bush (Sr) Administration who sat on the National Security Council, and who consistently advocated going to war against Iraq. Haass is also a member of the Defense Department's National Security Study Group, at the Pentagon.

Robert Zoellick
U.S. Trade Representative, a cabinet-level position. He is also one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the Bush (Jr) Administration who advocated invading Iraq and occupying a portion of the country in order to set up a Vichy-style puppet government. He consistently advocates going to war against Iran.

Ari Fleischer
Ex- White House Spokesman for the Bush (Jr) Administration. Prominent in the Jewish community, some reports state that he holds Israeli citizenship. Fleischer is closely connected to the extremist Jewish group called the Chabad Lubavitch Hasidics, who follow the Qabala, and hold very extremist and insulting views of non-Jews. Fleischer was the co-president of Chabad's Capitol Jewish Forum. He received the Young Leadership Award from the American Friends of Lubavitch in October, 2001.

James Schlesinger
One of many Pentagon Advisors, Schlesinger also sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor, who supported going to war against Iraq. Schlesinger is also a commissioner of the Defense Department's National Security Study Group, at the Pentagon.

David Frum
White House speechwriter behind the "Axis of Evil" label. He lumped together all the lies and accusations against Iraq for Bush to justify the war.

Joshua Bolten
White House Deputy Chief of Staff, Bolten was previously a banker, former legislative aide, and prominent in the Jewish community.

John Bolton
Former UN Representative and Under-Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security. Bolton is also a Senior Advisor to President Bush. Prior to this position, Bolton was Senior Vice President of the above mentioned pro-Israel thinktank, AEI. He recently (October 2002) accused Syria of having a nuclear program, so that they can attack Syria after Iraq. He must have forgotten that Israel has 400 nuclear warheads, some of which are thermonuclear weapons (according to a recent U.S. Air Force report).

David Wurmser
Special Assistant to John Bolton (above), the under-secretary for arms control and international security. Wurmser also worked at the AEI with Perle and Bolton. His wife, Meyrav Wurmser, along with Colonel Yigal Carmon, formerly of Israeli military intelligence, co-founded the Middle East Media Research Institute (Memri),a Washington-based Israeli outfit which distributes articles translated from Arabic newspapers portraying Arabs in a bad light.

Eliot Cohen
Member of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor. Like Adelman, he often expresses extremist and often ridiculus anti-Arab and anti-Muslim views. More recently, he wrote an opinion article in the Wall Street Journal openly admitting his rascist hatred of Islam claiming that Islam should be the enemy, not terrorism.

Mel Sembler
President of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. A Prominent Jewish Republican and Former National Finance Chairman of the Republican National Committee. The Export-Import Bank facilitates trade relationships between U.S. businesses and foreign countries, specifically those with financial problems.

Steve Goldsmith
Senior Advisor to the President, and Bush's Jewish domestic policy advisor. He also served as liaison in the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives (White House OFBCI) within the Executive Office of the President. He was the former mayor of Indianapolis. He is also friends with Israeli Jerusalem Mayor Ehud Olmert and often visits Israel to coach mayors on privatization initiatives.

Adam Goldman
White House's Special Liaison to the Jewish Community.

Joseph Gildenhorn
Bush Campaign's Special Liaison to the Jewish Community. He was the DC finance chairman for the Bush campaign, as well as campaign coordinator, and former ambassador to Switzerland.

Christopher Gersten
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Administration for Children and Families at HHS. Gersten was the former Executive Director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, Husband of Labor Secretary.

Mark Weinberger
Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Public Affairs.

Samuel Bodman
Deputy Secretary of Commerce. He was the Chairman and CEO of Cabot Corporation in Boston, Massachusetts.

Bonnie Cohen
Under Secretary of State for Management.

Ruth Davis
Director of Foreign Service Institute, who reports to the Office of Under Secretary for Management. This Office is responsible for training all Department of State staff (including ambassadors).

Daniel Kurtzer
Ambassador to Israel.

Cliff Sobel
Ambassador to the Netherlands.

Stuart Bernstein
Ambassador to Denmark.

Nancy Brinker
Ambassador to Hungary

Frank Lavin
Ambassador to Singapore.

Ron Weiser
Ambassador to Slovakia.

Mel Sembler
Ambassador to Italy.

Martin Silverstein
Ambassador to Uruguay.

Lincoln Bloomfield
Assistant Secretary of State for Political Military Affairs.

Jay Lefkowitz
Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of the Domestic Policy Council.

Ken Melman
White House Political Director.

Brad Blakeman
White House Director of Scheduling.

I don't know about you, but dual citizenship is fine with me for an ordinary citizen. But if you hold an official position that demands that you put American interests above all else -- if you should look transparent and fair to the rest of the world regarding your formation of Middle East foreign policies, then this is a dangerous trend. Even if there were no pro-Israeli agenda, the fact that decision makers have a bias or an allegiance to one of the parties involved in the current conflict should have raised red flags long before now.

If you think we're being unfair here, ask yourself: How you would react to the Head of Homeland Security if he or she were a dual national with citizenship in Iran, Lebanon or Saudi Arabia? Ask yourself why you don't feel the same about Israeli dual citizenship. Then you will understand how powerful the Israeli lobby has been in "adjusting" your acceptance of their special status.

Hey, I could be way off on this. Let's hear from you.

FBI arrests US scientist on spying charges

In Jerusalem, Israeli government officials had no immediate comment.

A scientist credited with helping discover evidence of water on the moon has been arrested on charges of attempting to pass on classified information to an FBI agent posing as an Israeli intelligence officer.

The US justice department said Stewart David Nozette, 52, was charged with attempting to communicate, deliver and transmit classified information to an individual he believed to be an Israeli intelligence officer.

The criminal complaint against Nozette does not allege that Israel's government or anyone acting on its behalf violated US law. In Jerusalem, where the story broke late at night, Israeli government officials had no immediate comment.

Nozette, from Maryland, was arrested yesterday by FBI agents. He is expected to appear in federal court in Washington today.

In an affidavit supporting the complaint, Leslie Martell, a FBI agent, said that on 3 September, Nozette received a telephone call from an individual purporting to be an Israeli intelligence officer. The caller was an undercover FBI agent.

Nozette agreed to meet with the agent later that day at a hotel in Washington. During the meeting the two discussed Nozette's willingness to work for Israeli intelligence. The scientist allegedly said that he had, in the past, held top security clearances and had access to US satellite information, the affidavit said.

Nozette also was alleged to have said he would be willing to answer questions about this information in exchange for money. According to the affidavit, the agent explained that the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad, would arrange for a communication system so Nozette could pass on information in a post office box.

Nozette agreed to provide regular, continuing information and asked for an Israeli passport, the government alleged.

The affidavit then alleged the following sequence of events:

Sept. 4: Nozette and the agent met again in the same hotel. The scientist allegedly said that while he no longer had legal access to any classified information at a US government facility, he could, nonetheless, recall classified information by memory. He allegedly asked when he could expect to receive his first settlement, saying he preferred cash amounts "under ten thousand" so he didn't have to report it to merchant accounts. (Anti-money laundering laws require that all transactions of $10,000 (Â£6,000) or more must be reported to the US tax authorities). Nozette allegedly told the agent, "Well, I should tell you my first need is that they should figure out how to pay me ... They don't expect me to do this for free."

Sept. 10: Undercover FBI agents left a letter in the designated post office box, asking Nozette to answer a list of questions about US satellite information. The agents provided a $2,000 cash payment. Serial numbers of the bills were recorded.

Sept. 16: Nozette was captured on videotape leaving a manila envelope in the post office box. The next day, agents retrieved the sealed envelope and found, among other things, a one-page document containing answers to the questions and an encrypted computer thumb drive. One answer contained information, classified as secret, that concerned capabilities of a prototype overhead collection system.

Sept. 17: Agents left a second letter in the post office box with another list of questions about US satellite information. The FBI also left a cash payment of $9,000. Nozette allegedly retrieved the questions and the money the same day.

Oct. 1: Nozette was videotaped leaving a manila envelope in the post office box. FBI agents retrieved it and found a second set of answers. The responses contained information classified as top secret and secret, involving US satellites, early warning systems, means of defence or retaliation against large-scale attack, communications intelligence information, and major elements of defence strategy.

Nozette had worked in varying jobs for the department of energy, the national aeronautics and space, and in the national space council in the president's office in 1989 and 1990. The scientist developed the Clementine bistatic radar experiment that purportedly discovered water on the south pole of the moon. He worked from approximately 1990 to 1999 at the department of energy's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, where he designed highly advanced technology. At the department of energy, Nozette held a special security clearance equivalent to the defence department top secret and "critical nuclear weapon design information" clearances. Department of energy clearances apply to access to information specifically relating to atomic or nuclear-related materials. Nozette also held top offices at the Alliance for Competitive Technology, a nonprofit company that he organised in March 1990. Between January 2000 and February 2006, Nozette, through his company, had several agreements to develop advanced technology for the US government. He performed some of the research and development at the US Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency in Arlington, Virginia, and at Nasa's Goddard Space Flight Centre in Greenbelt, Maryland.

Second Israel Rabbi Questioned Over Racist Book

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:31:00 +0000

Israeli police briefly detained a rabbi on Sunday over his endorsement of a controversial book that justifies the killing of non-Jews in certain circumstances, a police spokesman said on Sunday.

News of the brief detention and questioning of rabbi Yaakov Yosef, son of one of Israel's leading religious leaders, prompted his supporters to take to the streets in parts of Jerusalem, burning tyres and blocking the city's light railway.

Later about 1,000 of his supporters took to the streets, setting rubbish bins on fire and blocking a main Jerusalem road before being dispersed by horse-mounted police and water cannons, an AFP photographer said.

Police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said police moved against the demonstrators after they started throwing stones at the officers.

There were no immediate reports of injuries.

Police detained Yosef for around an hour after he failed to present himself voluntarily for questioning over his endorsement of a book called "The King's Torah."

Yosef is the son of rabbi Ovadia Yosef, a highly popular religious leader who is also the spiritual head of the Shas party, which is part of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's ruling coalition.

Yosef is the second high-profile rabbi to be questioned over the book, after police last week briefly detained rabbi Dov Lior, a key member of the settler movement. His detention also prompted protests by his students and supporters.

Rosenfeld said Yosef had been "questioned on suspicion of inciting violence and racism" over his support for the book.

"He was released after approximately an hour. After he was held, his supporters burnt tyres near (the main road between east and west Jerusalem) and police also made arrests of three people who were blocking the light railway system," Rosenfeld added.

Rabbi Lior's detention last week prompted rare criticism from Israel's two chief rabbis, who described it as a "grave offence against the honour of one of the most important rabbis and leaders of religious opinion."

But speaking at the opening of the weekly cabinet meeting on Sunday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said there would be no special treatment for rabbis.

"Israel is a nation of laws, as I said a few days ago. Nobody is above the law -- and I demand that every Israeli citizen respect the law," he said.

"The King's Torah" has stirred up controversy since its publication. Last August, its co-author, settler rabbi Yosef Elitzur was arrested on suspicion of incitement to violence.

But he was freed without charge days later after a court found police had not followed proper procedure.

The book reportedly says babies and children of Israel's enemies may be killed in certain circumstances since "it is clear that they will grow to harm us."

It also says non-Jews are "uncompassionate by nature" and that attacks on them "curb their evil inclination."

"Anywhere where the influence of gentiles constitutes a threat to the life of Israel, it is permissible to kill them," the rabbis wrote.

The book, published earlier this year, has drawn sharp criticism from many rabbis who say it contradicts the teachings of Judaism.

Source

Israel Slap US In The Face Again And Again

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:23:00 +0000

Brendon O'Connell Political Prisoner, Perth, Western Australia

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Sun, 05 Jun 2011 23:24:00 +0000

1. Isn't it interesting that You Tube does not have a category for legal matters -

2. Briefly, Brendon O'Connell has been found guilty by a jury of offending against the Western Australian Racial Discrimination Act.

3. At a pro-Palestinian public protest meeting in Perth against Israeli fruit imports Brendon became involved in a vigorous altercation with a young Jew who then claimed Brendon had hurt his feelings. This was enough to start an action under the Western Australian Racial Discrimination Act.

4. At the trial the State produced two witnesses - a Rabbi who claimed the Jew is a race, while an academic claimed the Jew is a religion.

5. The jury found O'Connell guilty and the trial judge gave O'Connell three years prison - and this sentence will, if permitted, be the basis of an appeal.

6. The fact that O'Connell represented himself adds strength to the fact that a legal injustice has been done - only a fool represents himself in court because he may be an expert in matters of fact but not matters of law, which is the larger factor a judge worries about when formulating his judgment.

7. The O'Connell case has split the Western Australia judiciary, hence the need to bring interstate lawyers to Perth to conduct appeals and judicial reviews. Dr John Walsh of Brannagh, Barrister-at-Law, is handling the appeal.

8. In the previous O'Connell clip the commentary response was amazingly vicious, of course anonymously made. This indicates that Brendon O'Connell has struck the right raw nerve of the enemy of free expression.

They're Getting Pretty Desperate Now :-)

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Sun, 15 May 2011 22:28:00 +0000

The following is my rebuttal of the piece published by the West Australian newspaper on 9th May.

Supporters of anti-Semite Brendon O’Connell still post anti-Jewish material on his blog to taunt his victims, despite him being jailed for three years for racial vilification over an online hate campaign.

So, we are 'taunting' Brendon's supposed "victims". Typical Jewish paranoia. The real victim here is Brendon O'Connell - he's the one who has had his liberty taken from him. The purpose of this blog is to raise awareness of Brendon's case, campaign for his release, and to expose the crimes of Jewry, Zionism and Israel, and we thank the Western Australian newspaper for this unexpected publicity. Cheers :-)

O’Connell, 40, was jailed in January but the blog which landed him behind bars is active.

Things are being kept ticking-over until Brendon is released from prison and can resume command of his blog.

Posts menace the jury and his victims including Stanley Keyser, 23, the man he filmed and chased in South Perth yelling Judaism was a “religion of racism, hate, homicide and ethnic cleansing”. The 2009 footage was the basis of his trial.

"Menace"?????? Oh dear, we're being really sensationalist and dramatic now, aren't we? :-)

From the Merriam-Webster dictionary:

Definition of MENACE
1: a show of intention to inflict harm
2a : one that represents a threat
2b : an annoying person

Although my Jewish critics no doubt find me rather annoying, they cannot however, legitimately accuse me of 'menacing' the jury who convicted Brendon O'Connell nor can they legitimately accuse me of 'menacing' his supposed "victims". Nowhere on this blog are there to be found any posts made by myself wherein I have issued any threats against, or shown any intention to inflict harm, upon Stanley Keyser, Timothy Peach, or any members of the jury that convicted Brendon O'Connell, and to imply otherwise is outright deception. But what else is to be expected from the mainstream media? Since when did legitimate criticism and the practice of free-speech become tantamount to 'meancing' behaviour?

The latest post, uploaded days ago, claims there is a Jewish conspiracy to rule the world.

The video contains a myriad of quotations made by prominent Jews who have openly boasted of their conquest for world domination. Below are but a few of these quotations. Many more can be found in the video posted thereafter.

We Jews regard our race as superior to all humanity, and look forward, not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them.

Goldwin Smith ~ Professor of Modern History at Oxford University ~ October 1981

We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.

Maurice Samuels ~ You Gentiles, p.155

We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent.

Paul Warburg ~ Testifying before the U.S. Senate on 17th February 1950

The video post is tagged with Mr Keyser’s name, despite the video having no reference or connection to him.

Wrong! Keyser's name wasn't tagged, and even if it had been, so what?

Mr Keyser said it was upsetting the blog was able to continue, but he felt its influence was limited.

Yes, Stanley "Sensitive" Keyser will be miffed that despite their best efforts, he and his cohorts haven't yet been able to get this blog closed down. And if the sensitive one truly believes this blog to have "limited influence", then why is he complaining about the blog to newspapers, and why have there been multiple attempts to have it closed-down?

“The person updating it seems more extreme than (O’Connell) is and he’s put up all these links to white supremacist groups and holocaust denier groups, so as much as his blog had no credibility in the first place, it has even less credibility now.”

Three points:

1. There are no links on this blog that point to "white supremacist groups and holocaust denier groups". The links that have been posted here point to a multitude of web sites, of which White Nationalist sites and Holocaust Revisionist sites represent but a tiny minority of the total links posted.

2. If this blog "had no credibility in the first place", then why was Brendon O'Connell charged and convicted on six separate counts of "racial vilification" arising out of posts he made here?

3. I have no problem with being labelled "extreme". In the eyes of the Jew, does there exist such a thing as a "moderate" critic of Jewry, Judaism, Zionism, Zionists and Israel? I think not! Anyone who dares criticise any of the five aforementioned is immediately labelled an "anti-Semite", a "Nazi", a "racist", a "hater" or even a "terrorist". And whenever it's one of Keyser's own tribe who is criticising Jewry, Judaism, Zionism, Zionists, or Israel, that critic then becomes a "self-hating Jew".

Steve Lieblich from the Jewish Community Council has also been targeted by the O’Connell blog.

"Targeted"? Give me a break. "Exposed" would be a far better descriptor. Attention has been drawn to the fact that Steve Lieblich is heavily involved with the suspected Mossad-front, Verint, and that Lieblich has served in an unspecified capacity with the Israeli Defense Forces. Lieblich's loyalty to Australia has also been called into question. Why did this man never enlist with the Australian army? Why is Lieblich uninterested in Australian issues? Why does he write pieces wherein only issues pertinent to the apartheid, terrorist state of Israel are raised? Ditto Stanley "Israel's Son" Keyser. The answer in both instances is that Lieblich and Keyser are fifth-columnists whose first allegiance is to Israel, not to the country of their birth. This is treason by any other name. If Lieblich and Keyser love Israel so much, why don't both of them go live there?

He said the continuing campaign was a concern but not surprising.

A "concern"? Why should a blog that Steve Lieblich's family friend, Stanley Keyser, has described as having "had no credibility in the first place" be a "concern"? But should Lieblich actually be concerned about this blog, this would imply that he's been rattled by what has been posted here.

“It has been like that for thousands of years,” he said.

On the subject of history that dates back over thousands of years.....

109 Locations whence Jews have been Expelled since AD250

British 7/7 Researcher Acquitted Of False Charges By Jury

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Sat, 14 May 2011 14:25:00 +0000

Comment: It is heartening to know that British juries aren't as gullible as their Western Australian counterparts.

How Did Mossad Know the London Bombings Were Going to Happen?

Mossad's 7/7 Fairytale

7/7 And The Mossad / Zionist Connection Exposed

Jury Rejects State Charges Against 7/7 Ripple Effect's Muad’Dib
(Source)

At 4pm on Thursday 12th May at Southwark Crown Court the jury returned and declared Muad’Dib (Anthony John Hill) innocent of attempting to ‘pervert the course of justice’.

Mr. Hill has spent 151 days incarcerated in Wandsworth prison over the past few months and this verdict spared him, mercifully, a sentence of up to 20 years in jail.

His offence? He had sent six DVD copies of his film ‘7/7: The Ripple Effect’ to various persons at the time (in 2008) of the trial in Kingston of three ‘terror’ suspects, alleged co-conspirators with the London ‘suicide bombers’. The DVD’s were intercepted and never reached their targets. The Kingston suspects were found innocent (only to later be retried for the same offences, but that’s another story).

Muad’Dib’s trial started on Monday 9th May, with a challenge to the monarchy and, hence, the authority of the court. This was ruled ‘out of order’ by the judge. On Tuesday a jury were sworn in.

On Wednesday they watched all of his film, ‘The Ripple Effect’, in open court.

Over the Tuesday and Wednesday the jury heard in-depth discussions of both 7/7 and 9/11, with Mr Hill laying out clearly, and at his own leisurely pace under cross-examination, the reasons he believes that both these ‘attacks by terrorists’ were, in fact, false flag attacks by agencies of the state against its own people carried out with the purpose of providing a pretext for invasion of innocent countries in the middle east in order to control their natural resources.

This was surely the first ever fully-explored set of such allegations of false flag terror made against any state before an ordinary collection of the citizens of that state.

It is also clear from the verdict that, when such information is placed before such ordinary citizens the majority of them ‘get it.’ The jury had announced that it could not be unanimous, so the judge allowed a ‘majority verdict’, i.e. ten or more of the 12.

It is surely not unfair to deduce that Southwark Crown Court’s jury of ordinary persons did not reject Muad’Dib’s false-flag narrative as outrageous or even necessarily untrue. One wonders how many of that jury have now themselves been converted into active ‘troofers’?

During the trial (on Wednesday) JAH/Hill/Muad’Dib was asked why he moved to Ireland: “To pursue my study of the lost Ark of the Covenant” was his reply. Here is a character, both serious and refreshing, who brings a mythic dimension into life. Onlookers were impressed by the way he was able to conduct himself without fear in the witness-box, sometimes pausing 5-10 seconds to reflect, before replying. A group of up to 25 supporters attended the four days of the trial, a couple travelling from as far afield as Finland and the state of Montana.

Let’s hope that will be the end of the persecution of Mr JAH by the British state – and, that he soon starts on a 2nd edition of his Ripple Effect.

It’s the opinion of Sheffield University social-sciences professor Ridley-Duff, that Mr Hill’s Ripple Effect’s narrative of what happened on that day, is more plausible and better fits the facts than did the BBC’s 7/7 ‘Conspiracy Files‘ program. His well-referenced study focussed very much on what happened at Canary Wharf on that morning, seeing the Ripple narrative, whereby the young alleged bombers had been inveigled into a terror drill that morning, then fled to Canary wharf where they were shot – as the best account yet. The new 3rd edition of my book Terror on the Tube endorses this view. In contrast, the so-called ‘July 7th Truth Campaign’ has scoffed at the Ripple narrative calling it ‘evidence-free conjecture,’ a quite breathtaking (and very revealing) remark

The Jewish Conspiracy Movie

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Tue, 03 May 2011 21:34:00 +0000

Disgusting Jewish "Comedy" Sketch Mocks The Christian Faith

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:53:00 +0000

Via our friends at Whitelaw Towers.....

Yes folks, Brendon O'Connell is sitting in a Western Australian Prison serving a THREE YEAR sentence for saying "You have a religion of racism, hate, homicide and ethnic cleansing." Meanwhile the Jewish criminals who pushed for the persecution of Brendon O'Connell sit back and have a good belly laugh while watching Israeli Television.

WAKE THE FUCK UP PEOPLE!

Racist Homicidal Maniacs

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:50:00 +0000

For The Jury Who Convicted Brendon O'Connell

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:13:00 +0000

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, take a look at a racist, homicidal maniac in action. This is precisely what Brendon O'Connell was warning about, you fools.

Yet Another Nutjob Jew Gets Caught Painting Swastikas On A Synagogue

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Sun, 10 Apr 2011 20:22:00 +0000

From Jewlicious, comes this hilarious piece.

And so another mentally-ill Jew is caught daubing Swastikas and Nazi slogans on a Synagogue.

You couldn't make this up....

When reports first came out about the anti-Semitic graffiti attack against B’nai Shalom synagogue of Olney, Maryland last summer, it seemed like your typical attack. Swastikas and Nazi references were sprayed on the walls. A suspect was apprehended – a disturbed, homeless young man, sporting Nazi tattoos, and with alcohol problems who was known to the police and whose fingerprints were found on cans of spray paint left behind. Ian Baron is in prison awaiting sentencing for this attack, and he faces up to six and a half years in jail.

Typical right? Except for one thing. Ian Baron is Jewish. In 2008 he went on a Birthright Israel trip. He had a Bar Mitzva, he went to Jewish day school, he attended synagogue services regularly. So what happened?? The Washington Jewish Week profiles Baron, a young man, of Latino birth, who was adopted by a Jewish couple, converted to Judaism and was raised fully Jewish.

Ian had his fair share of problems however. His parents moved when he was 13 and he had a learning disability. Most horribly of all however, he was teased and bullied in Middle School by his new Jewish classmates who would :

…regularly harass Ian, who has dark skin and Hispanic features, according to his parents. They would call him “kike” or “spic,” but would also shout, “You can’t be Jewish” because of his physical appearance,Marla and Steven recalled… This type of treatment “was a real shock for him,” Marla added, explaining that Ian would return home from school “distraught” over the name-calling… “He didn’t always fit in, and doesn’t look like your typical middle class, Jewish Olney kid,” said Rabbi Reuben Landman, HTAA’s spiritual leader, who counseled Ian when he was distressed. “He was lost and couldn’t find himself. His own Jewish identity was under question.” … Feeling estranged from the Jewish community because of his looks — and from the Hispanic community because of his faith — Ian became isolated, explained Rabbi Daniel Sikowitz, who’s been visiting him regularly at the Montgomery County Correctional Facility in Boyds… “He felt like he didn’t belong, that they [the Jewish and Hispanic communities] either hated him or rejected him out right,” said Sikowitz, spiritual leader of Reform congregation Kol Ami in Frederick.

He did enjoy his Birthright Israel trip, but after his return from Israel the situation deteriorated and he became an alcoholic. He moved out of his parents home, lived on the streets, hung out with the wrong crowd and eventually got into the situation that he is in today.

How does something like this happen? I’m no expert of course, but to whatever extent the teasing and the bullying about his appearance that he suffered at the hands of his Jewish classmates contributed to the situation, I would like to apologize to Ian, on behalf of decent Jews everywhere. As anyone who is steeped in Jewish religious law knows, it is a sin to embarrass anyone publicly. It is also especially wrong to question the Judaism of a Jewish convert. Furthermore, Judaism is not a race. There isn’t an official Jewish look or skin color or hair texture or nose size. The only people that believe that are ignorant racists, and the kids at Ian’s Jewish Middle School in Onley.

This should serve as a wake up call to every Jewish community. You better teach your children what it means to be a Jew, and what the ramifications of bullying are. In the meantime, I am glad that some members of the community have lent support to Ian. I am glad that Ian is attending Alcoholics Anonymous, I am glad that Ian is reconnecting with his Judaism while in prison and I hope that the judge shows him some leniency so that he can get the help and support that he needs.

Again, sorry Ian. I am horrified.

Brendon O'Connell, Acacia Prison, Western Australia

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Sun, 10 Apr 2011 19:50:00 +0000

Australia Calling: Free Brendon O'Connell

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:47:00 +0000

France Arrests Pro-Palestinians For Anti-Israel Campaign

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Sat, 19 Mar 2011 11:28:00 +0000

French prosecutors claim that taking part in Israeli boycotting protests and posting videos of these protests is "amount to incitement of racial hatred against Israel". Sound familiar?

David Icke 'Referred To The Australian Government For Further Processing'

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:17:00 +0000

Source: davidicke.com

David's application for a visa to speak in Australia in September/October has been delayed and 'referred to the Australian Government for further processing'.

The last time he spoke in Australia, in 2009, he was stopped at immigration in Melbourne and asked to sign an acknowledgement that he had read a letter he was handed by the authorities warning him not to cause 'discord' in the country.

a. Lack of agreement among persons, groups, or things.

b. Tension or strife resulting from a lack of agreement; dissension.

c. A confused or harsh sound or mingling of sounds.

This means that the Australian authorities must take issue with every politician in the Canberra parliament who cause 'discord' under this definition every day. How ludicrous.

We'll keep you posted to see what the government of 'free' Australia does next with regard to David's basic human right to speak to people who wish to hear him.

Click here for David's planned dates in Australia and New Zealand.

Come on chaps, be honest, it wasn't something I said was it?

What are you, Julia, a wolf in sheep's clothing?

'Ahhh, but he's saying what we don't want people to hear - we can't have that in a free and democratic country like ours ...'

'And another thing, Israel doesn't like him - so we don't. Benjamin told me.'

Not Guilty: The Israeli Captain Who Emptied His Rifle Into A Palestinian Schoolgirl

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:31:00 +0000

An Israeli army officer who fired the entire magazine of his automatic rifle into a 13-year-old Palestinian girl and then said he would have done the same even if she had been three years old was acquitted on all charges by a military court yesterday.

The soldier, who has only been identified as “Captain R”, was charged with relatively minor offences for the killing of Iman al-Hams who was shot 17 times as she ventured near an Israeli army post near Rafah refugee camp in Gaza a year ago.

The manner of Iman’s killing, and the revelation of a tape recording in which the captain is warned that she was just a child who was “scared to death”, made the shooting one of the most controversial since the Palestinian intifada erupted five years ago even though hundreds of other children have also died.

After the verdict, Iman’s father, Samir al-Hams, said the army never intended to hold the soldier accountable.

“They did not charge him with Iman’s murder, only with small offences, and now they say he is innocent of those even though he shot my daughter so many times,” he said. “This was the cold-blooded murder of a girl. The soldier murdered her once and the court has murdered her again. What is the message? They are telling their soldiers to kill Palestinian children.”

The military court cleared the soldier of illegal use of his weapon, conduct unbecoming an officer and perverting the course of justice by asking soldiers under his command to alter their accounts of the incident.

Capt R’s lawyers argued that the “confirmation of the kill” after a suspect is shot was a standard Israeli military practice to eliminate terrorist threats.

Following the verdict, Capt R burst into tears, turned to the public benches and said: “I told you I was innocent.”

The army’s official account said that Iman was shot for crossing into a security zone carrying her schoolbag which soldiers feared might contain a bomb. It is still not known why the girl ventured into the area but witnesses described her as at least 100 yards from the military post which was in any case well protected.

(Source)

Brendon O'Connell Moved To Another Prison

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Thu, 10 Mar 2011 04:41:00 +0000

I can confirm that Brendon has been relocated to Acacia Prison, Wooroloo, Western Australia. Those wishing to send Brendon letters of support may do so via this address:

Brendon O'Connell, Acacia Prison, Locked Bag 1, Wooroloo, WA 6558.

Brendon is permitted to receive money orders and cheques so dig-deep folks.

Michael Sutherland: Just Another Jew Enabler And Apologist

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Thu, 10 Mar 2011 04:26:00 +0000

So, Michael Sutherland supports "the prosecution of people such as Brendon O’Connell who incite hatred and cause unnecessary distress to sections of our community." Oh really? In this case, Sutherland should have no objection to the Jews in the videos below being arrested, tried and then slung in jail for three years. Not that such a scenario is ever going to happen. There are clearly one set of laws for "God's chosen" and another for we Gentiles.

Eh, Mr. Sutherland?

Sutherland also states: "Many members of the Jewish Community who have spoken to me since the O’Connell incident were deeply disturbed and offended by the incident". Oh dear. Such a bunch of "sensitive" Jews Sutherland has been chin-wagging with out in Mount Lawley, aren't they? Take a good look at the photographs and videos below "members of the Jewish community", this is what deeply disturbing and offensive looks like. So spare us the fucking wailing and gnashing of teeth please.

This is what Michael Sutherland's friends in his beloved Israel do to defenceless children. Is this not the work of racist, homicidal maniacs? Is it any wonder most of the civilised world despise that shitty, little country, that illegitimate, pariah, terrorist, criminal state that Sutherland and his cronies at Friends of Israel WA so dearly love?

Sutherland opines: "If, "hate speech", is not dealt with expeditiously then it could lead to an escalation of disharmony in the community."

Go tell it expeditiously to the Rabbi then you pompous hypocrite. Michael Sutherland MLA - just another Jew-enabler. Just another hypocrite.

Brendon O'Connell Latest Update

noreply@blogger.com (Deleted) — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:21:00 +0000

Via Whitelaw Towers.....

Well folks sad to say nothing has changed as yet. It is very hard for us to give the full story behind the scenes as we are not directly involved with the people who are helping him at this moment. They do not have a news letter or a media liaison officer.

I can say that all of those who have donated money including us can be assured it is being used to pay for the legal team to have him released while they go about the appeal process. We are aware of the circumstances but have not been given permission to publicize any other info. The last thing we need to do is jeopardize his appeal. Please be patient as we wait for further updates. If you wish to donate the details are below. For now continue to write to Brendon O'Connell, Unit 9, Hakea Prison, Locked Bag 111, Canningvale, Western Australia 6970, Australia

Account Name:- Australian Constitutional Trust

Bank for Trust Account:- Commonwealth bank

Bank Branch :- Norfolk Island

Account number :- 062 950 10004014

Make sure you put Brendon's down along with any donation.

I can say that he is being transferred to another prison in the coming weeks . We will update his new contact details as soon as we are made aware of them. Mail is very important, so please write to him if you have any further concerns. Thanks for your help.