<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Canon Rumors</title>
	
	<link>http://www.canonrumors.com</link>
	<description>You gotta know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:57:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/canonrumors/rss" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Odds &amp; Ends</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~3/EfDzuwYakdM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/odds-ends-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon 7D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Party Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Camera RAW 5.6 Beta vs Camera Raw 5.5
Photoframd has posted some comparison images of various RAW converters for the EOS 7D files.
http://blog.photoframd.com/&#8230;.
&#8220;The First&#8221; Feature Length Film&#8230;.
&#8230;. made using the 7D
http://www.theaspectratio.net/&#8230;.
Disclaimer: I do not fact check &#8220;The first&#8221; claims. 
Darwin Wigget&#8217;s 7D Review&#8230; the counterpoint
Pro Photo Home has posted a retort to the claims made by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-4883675891742296";
/* 468x60, created 10/4/09 */
google_ad_slot = "6702179775";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p><p><strong>Camera RAW 5.6 Beta vs Camera Raw 5.5</strong><br />
Photoframd has posted some comparison images of various RAW converters for the EOS 7D files.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://blog.photoframd.com/2009/11/19/adobe-camera-raw-56-beta-canon-7d-raw/" target="_self">http://blog.photoframd.com/&#8230;.</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;The First&#8221; Feature Length Film</strong>&#8230;.</p>
<div id="attachment_2585" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 170px"><img class="size-full wp-image-2585" title="7DPW" src="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/7DPW.jpg" alt="&quot;Everyone's a critic!&quot;" width="160" height="160" /><p class="wp-caption-text">&quot;Everyone&#39;s a critic!&quot;</p></div>
<p>&#8230;. made using the 7D</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.theaspectratio.net/WinterNightsLog8.htm" target="_self">http://www.theaspectratio.net/&#8230;.</a></strong></p>
<p><em>Disclaimer: I do not fact check &#8220;The first&#8221; claims.</em><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Darwin Wigget&#8217;s 7D Review&#8230; the counterpoint<br />
</strong>Pro Photo Home has posted a retort to the claims made by Darwin Wigget and his <a href="http://darwinwiggett.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/the-canon-7d/" target="_self">review of the 7D</a>.</p>
<p>Pro Photo Home seems to be doing tests at f/5.6 &amp; f/16. I think the issue with the 7D was in the f/8 to f/11 area. Most seem to be saying that diffraction sets in with larger apertures on the 7D compared to the XSi.</p>
<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but check it out.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.prophotohome.com/news/2009/11/19/canon-7d-worse-than-canon-rebel-xsi/" target="_self">http://www.prophotohome.com/&#8230;.</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Old News, I forgot to post it<br />
</strong>Here is Lee&#8217;s solution to filtering (some filters) ultra wide angle lenses.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.ephotozine.com/article/Lee-Filters-holder-for-Nikons-1424mm-f28-wideangle-lens-12507" target="_self">http://www.ephotozine.com/&#8230;.</a></strong></p>
<p>The bad news? You still can&#8217;t use a polarizer. There is a company working on a solution so you can actually polarize these lenses as well.</p>
<p><em>thanks James</em></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3Za6Zx_WdaM05L5qSFJ7BWlgzFQ/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3Za6Zx_WdaM05L5qSFJ7BWlgzFQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3Za6Zx_WdaM05L5qSFJ7BWlgzFQ/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3Za6Zx_WdaM05L5qSFJ7BWlgzFQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~4/EfDzuwYakdM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/odds-ends-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/odds-ends-12/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Camera Raw 5.6 Hits</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~3/NH2qtxfkL5c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/camera-raw-5-6-hits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Third Party Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Adobe
Newly supported camera models include:
* Canon EOS 7D
* Canon PowerShot G11
* Canon PowerShot S90
* Leaf Aptus II 5
* Mamiya DM22, DM28, DM33, DM56, M18, M22, M31
* Nikon D3s
* Olympus E-P2
* Pentax K-x
* Panasonic FZ38
* Sigma DP1s
* Sony A500
* Sony A550
* Sony A850
Camera Raw 5.6 also provides a a fix for an issue affecting PowerPC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>From Adobe<br />
</strong>Newly supported camera models include:</p>
<p>* Canon EOS 7D<br />
* Canon PowerShot G11<br />
* Canon PowerShot S90<br />
* Leaf Aptus II 5<br />
* Mamiya DM22, DM28, DM33, DM56, M18, M22, M31<br />
* Nikon D3s<br />
* Olympus E-P2<br />
* Pentax K-x<br />
* Panasonic FZ38<br />
* Sigma DP1s<br />
* Sony A500<br />
* Sony A550<br />
* Sony A850</p>
<p>Camera Raw 5.6 also provides a a fix for an issue affecting PowerPC customers using the final Camera Raw 5.5 and DNG Converter 5.5 updates on the Mac. The issue, introduced in the demosaic change to address sensors with unequal green response, has the potential to create artifacts in highlight areas when processing raw files from Sony, Olympus, Panasonic and various medium format digital camera backs.</p>
<p><strong>Download: <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Camera_Raw_5.6" target="_self">http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Camera_Raw_5.6</a></strong></p>
<p><em>Thanks Kevan</em><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r<br />
</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1dumOxJDvXj2BHnJlEJntsJCJKg/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1dumOxJDvXj2BHnJlEJntsJCJKg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1dumOxJDvXj2BHnJlEJntsJCJKg/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1dumOxJDvXj2BHnJlEJntsJCJKg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~4/NH2qtxfkL5c" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/camera-raw-5-6-hits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/camera-raw-5-6-hits/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro Discontinued?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~3/I47xnHfrKBY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/ef-100mm-f2-8-macro-discontinued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was hoping not
I received word from a few folks that the EF 100 f/2.8 Macro has been discontinued. The lens currently still appears in Canon Canada&#8217;s price lists as well as Canon USA&#8217;s. The manufacturing of the lens may have stopped.
I hope this lens isn&#8217;t gone, there&#8217;s a big difference between $650CAD and $1300CAD [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I was hoping not</strong><br />
I received word from a few folks that the EF 100 f/2.8 Macro has been discontinued. The lens currently still appears in Canon Canada&#8217;s price lists as well as Canon USA&#8217;s. The manufacturing of the lens may have stopped.</p>
<p>I hope this lens isn&#8217;t gone, there&#8217;s a big difference between $650CAD and $1300CAD for a 100mm Macro. I own the aformentioned lens, and I have no plans to upgrade.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll look for something definitive.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9gQik0bM5RkJ7M1W4sLlUBejBvE/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9gQik0bM5RkJ7M1W4sLlUBejBvE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9gQik0bM5RkJ7M1W4sLlUBejBvE/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9gQik0bM5RkJ7M1W4sLlUBejBvE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~4/I47xnHfrKBY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/ef-100mm-f2-8-macro-discontinued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/ef-100mm-f2-8-macro-discontinued/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>January 2010 [CR1]</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~3/19z-pB4CL3Q/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/january-2010-cr1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon 1Ds Mark 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All that&#8217;s needed is a spark sometimes
I received an email in response to the report the November 24, 2009 announcement day had been pushed back until January.
&#8220;Yes, it has been delayed until January now, this is the second time this has happened although this time not due to a technical issues but more marketing. If [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>All that&#8217;s needed is a spark sometimes</strong><br />
I received an email in response to the report the November 24, 2009 announcement day had been pushed back until January.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Yes, it has been delayed until January now, this is the second time this has happened although this time not due to a technical issues but more marketing. If everything goes to plan (which hardly happens to be honest), January will be a killer month for announcements:</em></p>
<p><em>1Ds Mark IV together with the new duo of high end lenses. The 70-200 2.8 IS II and of course the 24-70 II IS.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>CR&#8217;s Take</strong><em><br />
</em>The lenses I&#8217;m not shocked by, they&#8217;ve sort of become the lenses that will always be replaced. I&#8217;ll be taking a wait and see approach.</p>
<p>However, a 1Ds4 announcement already? I thought the 1D4 was early&#8230;. this would be crazy.<em></em></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong><em><br />
</em></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9sKNKGept4arsb1hzSkB0CLb5Xo/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9sKNKGept4arsb1hzSkB0CLb5Xo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9sKNKGept4arsb1hzSkB0CLb5Xo/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9sKNKGept4arsb1hzSkB0CLb5Xo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~4/19z-pB4CL3Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/january-2010-cr1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/january-2010-cr1/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Nothing to speak of</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~3/zsvdEWKv48s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/nothing-to-speak-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon 3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slow
There&#8217;s nothing going on in Canon land at the moment. I&#8217;m digging up nothing.
70-200 2.8L IS II
I did received an email claiming the 24th of November WAS correct but an announcement has been delayed until January.
A couple of stores in Canada I spoke to that had long backorders on 70-200 f/2.8L IS say they finally [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Slow<br />
</strong>There&#8217;s nothing going on in Canon land at the moment. I&#8217;m digging up nothing.<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>70-200 2.8L IS II<br />
</strong>I did received an email claiming the 24th of November <strong>WAS</strong> correct but an announcement has been delayed until January.<strong></strong></p>
<p>A couple of stores in Canada I spoke to that had long backorders on 70-200 f/2.8L IS say they finally got a couple of lenses. This also happened to them shortly before Nikon announced their replacement.<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Bored? Howabout a 3D Rumor?<br />
</strong><em>&#8220;According to my friend after canons &#8220;disappointment&#8221; with the 7D they will be releasing a full frame version in mid-late 2010.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m stretching here&#8230; but I hate not updating the site. Have some fun :)<em></em></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong><em><br />
</em></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/6zTq9W_wXIiuJl6Prugox7pghpE/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/6zTq9W_wXIiuJl6Prugox7pghpE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/6zTq9W_wXIiuJl6Prugox7pghpE/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/6zTq9W_wXIiuJl6Prugox7pghpE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~4/zsvdEWKv48s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/nothing-to-speak-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/nothing-to-speak-of/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>1D Mark IV White Paper</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~3/QYH2GtHpDBw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon 1D Mark 4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Came out yesterday
Here&#8217;s a link the white paper for the 1D Mark IV and other Canon cameras.
http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=GetArticleAct&#38;articleID=1787
They&#8217;re good reading if you&#8217;re bored.
cr
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Came out yesterday</strong><br />
Here&#8217;s a link the white paper for the 1D Mark IV and other Canon cameras.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=GetArticleAct&amp;articleID=1787" target="_self">http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=GetArticleAct&amp;articleID=1787</a></strong></p>
<p>They&#8217;re good reading if you&#8217;re bored.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wuXdqYYWFUsqtG8yLP1w8tCbsDM/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wuXdqYYWFUsqtG8yLP1w8tCbsDM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wuXdqYYWFUsqtG8yLP1w8tCbsDM/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wuXdqYYWFUsqtG8yLP1w8tCbsDM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~4/QYH2GtHpDBw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-white-paper/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II Announcement [CR2]</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~3/k1sWZp4j8XQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-announcement-cr2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Soon!
I received notice that there will be a Canon announcement on November, 24, 2009 in regards to a new 70-200 f/2.8L IS II.
No word on any other lenses being announced. Still waiting on CR3 confirmation.
cr
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Soon!</strong><br />
I received notice that there will be a Canon announcement on November, 24, 2009 in regards to a new 70-200 f/2.8L IS II.</p>
<p>No word on any other lenses being announced. Still waiting on CR3 confirmation.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5DJB7kF5vy3oGRIFB1h5I9CeRU4/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5DJB7kF5vy3oGRIFB1h5I9CeRU4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5DJB7kF5vy3oGRIFB1h5I9CeRU4/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5DJB7kF5vy3oGRIFB1h5I9CeRU4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~4/k1sWZp4j8XQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-announcement-cr2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>105</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/ef-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-announcement-cr2/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>EOS 7D Review – Darwin Wiggett</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~3/xXKo-o9Xu9s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/eos-7d-review-darwin-wiggett/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon 7D]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not much love here
I&#8217;m a big fan of Darwin&#8217;s work. He&#8217;s one of those photographers that makes landscape images I can stare at for long periods of time. I was pretty eager to read his take on the 7D.
I was quite surprised by the results&#8230;.
From Darwin
&#8220;Of all the cameras we have ever used, we loved [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Not much love here</strong><br />
I&#8217;m a big fan of Darwin&#8217;s work. He&#8217;s one of those photographers that makes landscape images I can stare at for long periods of time. I was pretty eager to read his take on the 7D.</p>
<p>I was quite surprised by the results&#8230;.</p>
<p><strong>From Darwin</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;Of all the cameras we have ever used, we loved the handling of the Canon 7D the best. What a little sports car of a camera! We so much wanted to love this camera. But in test after test we constantly were disappointed in the quality of the files. For our purposes, landscape and nature photography shot using RAW images, the 7D just does not cut it. Darwin is definitely keeping his Rebel (a great camera for the money) for backpacking. We were so impressed with the Canon G11 that we plan to add it to our camera bags as an everyday walk around camera.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Read More: <a href="http://darwinwiggett.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/the-canon-7d/" target="_self">http://darwinwiggett.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/the-canon-7d/</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>CR&#8217;s Take</strong><br />
I&#8217;m super curious now if I&#8217;d get the same results. I&#8217;m going to give it a whirl if I get some time.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r<br />
</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_EaJGm4FFcPiuJxcZoep71wTPq4/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_EaJGm4FFcPiuJxcZoep71wTPq4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_EaJGm4FFcPiuJxcZoep71wTPq4/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_EaJGm4FFcPiuJxcZoep71wTPq4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~4/xXKo-o9Xu9s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/eos-7d-review-darwin-wiggett/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>136</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/eos-7d-review-darwin-wiggett/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>EF 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro Reviewed – DPReview</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~3/PuN9DzrpL4k/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/ef-100mm-f2-8l-is-macro-reviewed-dpreview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon Lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice lens
DPReview has completed their indepth review of the new L macro. I haven&#8217;t had the chance to play around with one yet.
From DPR
&#8220;Overall, then, the EF 100mm F2.8 L IS USM Macro is an easy recommendation if you&#8217;re looking for exceptional image quality regardless of price. However potential buyers do need to appreciate that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nice lens<br />
</strong>DPReview has completed their indepth review of the new L macro. I haven&#8217;t had the chance to play around with one yet.</p>
<p><strong>From DPR</strong><br />
<em>&#8220;Overall, then, the EF 100mm F2.8 L IS USM Macro is an easy recommendation if you&#8217;re looking for exceptional image quality regardless of price. However potential buyers do need to appreciate that the increased cost over its older stablemate appears to pay mainly for the Hybrid IS system, which despite its clever technology isn&#8217;t hugely useful for actual close-distance macro work. Of course it&#8217;s still a great benefit for general-purpose shooting, which mustn&#8217;t be underestimated, and the new Hybrid technology appears to be a step in the right direction; but the marriage between macro and stabilization remains an uneasy one.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/canon_100_2p8_is_usm_c16/" target="_self">http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/canon_100_2p8_is_usm_c16/</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong><em><br />
</em></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sHeX-A8ppXC5ZZLK6VOJf0Bq_l8/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sHeX-A8ppXC5ZZLK6VOJf0Bq_l8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sHeX-A8ppXC5ZZLK6VOJf0Bq_l8/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sHeX-A8ppXC5ZZLK6VOJf0Bq_l8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~4/PuN9DzrpL4k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/ef-100mm-f2-8l-is-macro-reviewed-dpreview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/ef-100mm-f2-8l-is-macro-reviewed-dpreview/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>1D Mark IV Manual Online</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~3/UaQOUdecZFc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-manual-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Canon Rumors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon 1D Mark 4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonrumors.com/?p=3030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The countdown begins
The manual usually arrived about a month before the camera will be in the hands of the eager (that&#8217;d be me).
Happy reading!
http://www.canonrumors.com/files/1d4_manual_en.pdf
thanks Rhett

cr
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The countdown begins</strong><br />
The manual usually arrived about a month before the camera will be in the hands of the eager (that&#8217;d be me).</p>
<p>Happy reading!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/files/1d4_manual_en.pdf" target="_self"><strong>http://www.canonrumors.com/files/1d4_manual_en.pdf</strong></a></p>
<p><em>thanks Rhett</em><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/n5GO92eWiXGn1l9w3zMNBIn-6-E/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/n5GO92eWiXGn1l9w3zMNBIn-6-E/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/n5GO92eWiXGn1l9w3zMNBIn-6-E/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/n5GO92eWiXGn1l9w3zMNBIn-6-E/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/canonrumors/rss/~4/UaQOUdecZFc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-manual-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.canonrumors.com/2009/11/1d-mark-iv-manual-online/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.354 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-11-20 10:54:22 -->
