<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Cele|bitchy	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.celebitchy.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.celebitchy.com</link>
	<description>escapism can be smart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:45:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on UK-based reporters are traveling to Australia to stalk Prince Harry &#038; Meghan by Morning		</title>
		<link>https://www.celebitchy.com/971126/uk-based_reporters_are_traveling_to_australia_to_stalk_prince_harry_meghan/#comment-18321243</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morning]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.celebitchy.com/?p=971126#comment-18321243</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hope RAVEC is watching this as they prepare to make their security determination.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope RAVEC is watching this as they prepare to make their security determination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The BBC found that the BAFTA n-word controversy breached their standards by Steph		</title>
		<link>https://www.celebitchy.com/971012/the_bbc_found_that_the_bafta_n-word_controversy_breached_their_standards/#comment-18321242</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.celebitchy.com/?p=971012#comment-18321242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.celebitchy.com/971012/the_bbc_found_that_the_bafta_n-word_controversy_breached_their_standards/#comment-18321232&quot;&gt;Jais&lt;/a&gt;.

My thoughts exactly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.celebitchy.com/971012/the_bbc_found_that_the_bafta_n-word_controversy_breached_their_standards/#comment-18321232">Jais</a>.</p>
<p>My thoughts exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on UK-based reporters are traveling to Australia to stalk Prince Harry &#038; Meghan by Dee(2)		</title>
		<link>https://www.celebitchy.com/971126/uk-based_reporters_are_traveling_to_australia_to_stalk_prince_harry_meghan/#comment-18321241</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dee(2)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.celebitchy.com/?p=971126#comment-18321241</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is all so unhinged and probably could have been three separate articles! 
This seems like a live application of the Streisand effect.

Why is this a story? (Humor me).

A famous person is having an event, an event the general public can attend if they purchase a ticket. A Super fan purchased the ticket, where they get to meet famous person. Super fan has strong opinions, that they share online. Opinions I would not have known about, and probably a good majority of people would have never heard if they hadn&#039;t printed it in their newspaper. I&#039;m struggling to see why this is newsworthy for the British media?

This is not an event attended by the Princess of Wales. This is not an event attended by someone that even lives in the UK apparently. Are they now at the point where they question why people are allowed to have negative opinions of William and Kate? Or that Harry and Meghan aren&#039;t even allowed to tangentially be associated with people that don&#039;t share positive opinions of the British royal family? What is this??

And the wild part is that even though that they&#039;re writing these articles, which comes across to me as incredibly envious and bitter, now they&#039;re just going to stalk their social media to lift it for articles so they can write about the event, because they weren&#039;t allowed in. So interesting to watch people collectively claim that they&#039;re bored of someone, that someone is unpopular and irrelevant, and to literally be online stalking their supporters&#039; social media to write articles in a national newspaper. Is this not embarrassing?

American Media is nothing to brag about right now, but there&#039;s not 50 articles everyday in the Washington Post and New York Times about Beyonce. It used to be dismissed as just the tabloids, but this type of stuff  now regularly appears in the broadsheets as well. This should be humiliating.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all so unhinged and probably could have been three separate articles!<br />
This seems like a live application of the Streisand effect.</p>
<p>Why is this a story? (Humor me).</p>
<p>A famous person is having an event, an event the general public can attend if they purchase a ticket. A Super fan purchased the ticket, where they get to meet famous person. Super fan has strong opinions, that they share online. Opinions I would not have known about, and probably a good majority of people would have never heard if they hadn&#8217;t printed it in their newspaper. I&#8217;m struggling to see why this is newsworthy for the British media?</p>
<p>This is not an event attended by the Princess of Wales. This is not an event attended by someone that even lives in the UK apparently. Are they now at the point where they question why people are allowed to have negative opinions of William and Kate? Or that Harry and Meghan aren&#8217;t even allowed to tangentially be associated with people that don&#8217;t share positive opinions of the British royal family? What is this??</p>
<p>And the wild part is that even though that they&#8217;re writing these articles, which comes across to me as incredibly envious and bitter, now they&#8217;re just going to stalk their social media to lift it for articles so they can write about the event, because they weren&#8217;t allowed in. So interesting to watch people collectively claim that they&#8217;re bored of someone, that someone is unpopular and irrelevant, and to literally be online stalking their supporters&#8217; social media to write articles in a national newspaper. Is this not embarrassing?</p>
<p>American Media is nothing to brag about right now, but there&#8217;s not 50 articles everyday in the Washington Post and New York Times about Beyonce. It used to be dismissed as just the tabloids, but this type of stuff  now regularly appears in the broadsheets as well. This should be humiliating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The BBC found that the BAFTA n-word controversy breached their standards by Kaiser		</title>
		<link>https://www.celebitchy.com/971012/the_bbc_found_that_the_bafta_n-word_controversy_breached_their_standards/#comment-18321240</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaiser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.celebitchy.com/?p=971012#comment-18321240</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.celebitchy.com/971012/the_bbc_found_that_the_bafta_n-word_controversy_breached_their_standards/#comment-18321232&quot;&gt;Jais&lt;/a&gt;.

If memory serves, they took it down from the iPlayer by GMT late afternoon, and late morning EST]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.celebitchy.com/971012/the_bbc_found_that_the_bafta_n-word_controversy_breached_their_standards/#comment-18321232">Jais</a>.</p>
<p>If memory serves, they took it down from the iPlayer by GMT late afternoon, and late morning EST</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on UK-based reporters are traveling to Australia to stalk Prince Harry &#038; Meghan by Brassy Rebel		</title>
		<link>https://www.celebitchy.com/971126/uk-based_reporters_are_traveling_to_australia_to_stalk_prince_harry_meghan/#comment-18321239</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brassy Rebel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.celebitchy.com/?p=971126#comment-18321239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re not allowed to have security if you put yourself in situations where strangers have access to you is a very weird argument, even from the DM. I guess every politician in the world is not entitled to security based on this edict.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not allowed to have security if you put yourself in situations where strangers have access to you is a very weird argument, even from the DM. I guess every politician in the world is not entitled to security based on this edict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on UK-based reporters are traveling to Australia to stalk Prince Harry &#038; Meghan by Shiela Kerr		</title>
		<link>https://www.celebitchy.com/971126/uk-based_reporters_are_traveling_to_australia_to_stalk_prince_harry_meghan/#comment-18321238</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shiela Kerr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.celebitchy.com/?p=971126#comment-18321238</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hoping Meghan gets to enjoy this trip regardless to the amount of noise surrounding it and the women attending get to enjoy her conversations, the weather and the environment created for this retreat.  Hopeful the gutter UK press is locked out and forced to stay far away from Meghan.  The insanity surrounding Meghan is chilling and scary.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoping Meghan gets to enjoy this trip regardless to the amount of noise surrounding it and the women attending get to enjoy her conversations, the weather and the environment created for this retreat.  Hopeful the gutter UK press is locked out and forced to stay far away from Meghan.  The insanity surrounding Meghan is chilling and scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on UK-based reporters are traveling to Australia to stalk Prince Harry &#038; Meghan by Amy Bee		</title>
		<link>https://www.celebitchy.com/971126/uk-based_reporters_are_traveling_to_australia_to_stalk_prince_harry_meghan/#comment-18321237</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amy Bee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.celebitchy.com/?p=971126#comment-18321237</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If the DM recognizes that Harry and Meghan face threats from derangers doesn&#039;t that justify his request for security not undermine it? The British press is unhinged and I&#039;m not surprised that they are sending journalists to stalk Harry and Meghan.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the DM recognizes that Harry and Meghan face threats from derangers doesn&#8217;t that justify his request for security not undermine it? The British press is unhinged and I&#8217;m not surprised that they are sending journalists to stalk Harry and Meghan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on David Geffen finally reached a divorce settlement with his much-younger husband by RMS		</title>
		<link>https://www.celebitchy.com/971023/david_geffen_finally_reached_a_divorce_settlement_with_his_much-younger_husband/#comment-18321236</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RMS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.celebitchy.com/?p=971023#comment-18321236</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have a close friend who has been with a very wealthy man for 12 years.  They finally married after she signed a pretty comprehensive pre-nuptial agreement.  She has already had a lot of plastic surgery, some of which she wanted and some of which he added on that he wanted her to do.  The pre-nup also specifies certain physical standards to which she must adhere.  She will soon be 59, so these &#039;standards&#039; get tougher to live up to every year.  Forgive me for not considering this a real love match!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a close friend who has been with a very wealthy man for 12 years.  They finally married after she signed a pretty comprehensive pre-nuptial agreement.  She has already had a lot of plastic surgery, some of which she wanted and some of which he added on that he wanted her to do.  The pre-nup also specifies certain physical standards to which she must adhere.  She will soon be 59, so these &#8216;standards&#8217; get tougher to live up to every year.  Forgive me for not considering this a real love match!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on UK-based reporters are traveling to Australia to stalk Prince Harry &#038; Meghan by kirk		</title>
		<link>https://www.celebitchy.com/971126/uk-based_reporters_are_traveling_to_australia_to_stalk_prince_harry_meghan/#comment-18321235</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kirk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.celebitchy.com/?p=971126#comment-18321235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;It is not known whether taxpayer money is being used to fund the trip.&quot; — Willful ignorance allows them to justify treating it as a &#039;royal tour&#039; giving tabloids&#039; ownership. <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/72x72/1f92e.png" alt="🤮" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is not known whether taxpayer money is being used to fund the trip.&#8221; — Willful ignorance allows them to justify treating it as a &#8216;royal tour&#8217; giving tabloids&#8217; ownership. 🤮</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on UK-based reporters are traveling to Australia to stalk Prince Harry &#038; Meghan by Julia		</title>
		<link>https://www.celebitchy.com/971126/uk-based_reporters_are_traveling_to_australia_to_stalk_prince_harry_meghan/#comment-18321234</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.celebitchy.com/?p=971126#comment-18321234</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Zandi Sussex account is anonymous, using a fake name. The Mail asking the organisers if Zandi is going to the event is bonkers. How are the organisers supposed to know if the attendees have anonymous accounts? It’s one thing doing a search to see if any of the attendees is a journalist or has a negative online presence but if they have an anonymous account with a made up name how is anyone supposed to link that to someone who is attending the event?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Zandi Sussex account is anonymous, using a fake name. The Mail asking the organisers if Zandi is going to the event is bonkers. How are the organisers supposed to know if the attendees have anonymous accounts? It’s one thing doing a search to see if any of the attendees is a journalist or has a negative online presence but if they have an anonymous account with a made up name how is anyone supposed to link that to someone who is attending the event?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The BBC found that the BAFTA n-word controversy breached their standards by Jais		</title>
		<link>https://www.celebitchy.com/971012/the_bbc_found_that_the_bafta_n-word_controversy_breached_their_standards/#comment-18321232</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jais]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.celebitchy.com/?p=971012#comment-18321232</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Huh. But didn’t it stay up on the iplayer until Monday afternoon???  They’re making it sound like it was taken down first thing Monday morning when that was not the case. Am I wrong on that or are they not being honest about that part?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh. But didn’t it stay up on the iplayer until Monday afternoon???  They’re making it sound like it was taken down first thing Monday morning when that was not the case. Am I wrong on that or are they not being honest about that part?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on UK-based reporters are traveling to Australia to stalk Prince Harry &#038; Meghan by ThatGirlThere		</title>
		<link>https://www.celebitchy.com/971126/uk-based_reporters_are_traveling_to_australia_to_stalk_prince_harry_meghan/#comment-18321231</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ThatGirlThere]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 11:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.celebitchy.com/?p=971126#comment-18321231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Of course they’re sending over stalkers posing as press, just like the days end in y. I’m just grateful that Meghan and Harry have top notch security.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course they’re sending over stalkers posing as press, just like the days end in y. I’m just grateful that Meghan and Harry have top notch security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
