CELEBRATION

noreply@blogger.com (ATOM) — Sat, 9 Oct 2010 11:47:00 -0700

"Dianna"

K.A.R.T. Advantage - KART Advantage Advertising Blog

noreply@blogger.com (ATOM) — Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:59:00 -0700

K.A.R.T. Advantage - KART Advantage Advertising Blog

OnlineWealth - Truly UNLIMITED DAILY CASH by ALERTPAY and PAYPAL: Times 2!!

noreply@blogger.com (ATOM) — Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:29:00 -0700

OnlineWealth - Truly UNLIMITED DAILY CASH by ALERTPAY and PAYPAL: Times 2!!

Onequartlow.com - Labor Day and Oil?

noreply@blogger.com (ATOM) — Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:26:00 -0700

Onequartlow.com - Labor Day and Oil?

noreply@blogger.com (ATOM) — Mon, 6 Sep 2010 01:17:00 -0700

DINKY DI AUSSIE ADS - This video on your website will grow your business

noreply@blogger.com (ATOM) — Mon, 6 Sep 2010 01:12:00 -0700

DINKY DI AUSSIE ADS - This video on your website will grow your business

Why Some Men Have Dogs And Not Wives

noreply@blogger.com (ATOM) — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:10:00 -0700

The later you are, the more excited your dogs are to see you.

2. Dogs don't notice if you call them by another dog's name.

3. Dogs like it if you leave a lot of things on the floor.

4. A dog's parents never visit.

5. Dogs agree that you have to raise your voice to get your point across.

6. You never have to wait for a dog; they're ready to go 24 hours a day.
7. Dogs find you amusing when you're drunk..

8. Dogs like to go hunting and fishing.

9. A dog will not wake you up at night to ask, "If I died, would you get another dog?"
10. If a dog has babies, you can put an ad in the paper and give them away.

11. A dog will let you put a studded collar on it without calling you a pervert.

12. If a dog smells another dog on you, they don't get mad. They just think it's interesting.

13. Dogs like to ride in the back of a pickup truck.
And last, but certainly not least:
14. If a dog leaves, it won't take half of your stuff.

Ultimate True Test
:
Lock your wife and your dog in the trunk of your car for an hour. Then open the trunk and see who's the happiest to see you.

Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

DIAMOND PRICE

noreply@blogger.com (ATOM) — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:04:00 -0700

Blue diamond Cost 7.98 million dollars

Frozen Haute Chocolate Dessert cost 25,000 dollars

Diva Premium vodka spirit cost 1,060,000 dollars

Earrings cost 8.5 million dollars

Eco-House cost 7.2 MN pounds

Expensive Apartment Cost 200 million dollars

Expensive diamond Sandals cost 2mn dollars

Gold-remote control Cost 55,000. Dollars
Most expensive Lipstick KissKiss cost 62,000 dollars

Most Expensive Sari Costs Rs 40 lakh

Most expensive omelet cost 100 dollars per omelet

Most expensive perfume cost 215,000 dollars per bottle

Most expensive Perrier-Jouet champagne is valued at 50,000 Euros
Priciest food ever 15,000 dollars per pound

Most expensive valentine rose 75,450 dollars

Most expensive Diamond tie 220000 dollars

Are the Gospels true?

noreply@blogger.com (ATOM) — Tue, 6 Jul 2010 00:19:00 -0700

Are the Gospels true?

Are the New Testament gospels the true eyewitness history of Jesus Christ, or could the story have been changed through the years? Must we simply take the New Testament accounts of Jesus by faith, or is there evidence for their reliability?

The late ABC News anchor Peter Jennings was in Israel broadcasting a television special on Jesus Christ. His program, “The Search for Jesus,” explored the question of whether the Jesus of the New Testament was historically accurate.

Jennings featured opinions on the Gospel accounts from DePaul professor John Dominic Crossan, three of Crossan’s colleagues from the Jesus Seminar, and two other Bible scholars. (The Jesus Seminar is a group of scholars who debate Jesus’ recorded words and actions and then use red, pink, gray, or black beads to cast votes indicating how trustworthy they believe statements in the Gospels are.)¹

Some of the comments were stunning. There on national TV Dr. Crossan not only cast doubt on more than 80 percent of Jesus’ sayings but also denied Jesus’ claims to divinity, his miracles, and his resurrection. Jennings clearly was intrigued by the image of Jesus presented by Crossan.

Searching for true Bible history is always news, which is why every year Time and Newsweek go on a cover story quest for Mary, Jesus, Moses, or Abraham. Or—who knows?—maybe this year it will be “Bob: The Untold Story of the Missing 13th Disciple.”

This is entertainment, and so the investigation will never end nor yield answers, as that would eliminate future programming. Instead, those with radically different views are thrown together like an episode of Survivor, hopelessly convoluting the issue rather than bringing clarity.

But Jennings’s report did focus on one issue that ought to be given some serious thought. Crossan implied that the original accounts of Jesus were embellished by oral tradition and were not written down until after the apostles were dead. Thus they are largely unreliable and fail to give us an accurate picture of the real Jesus. How are we to know if this is really true?

Was Jesus a real person?

noreply@blogger.com (ATOM) — Tue, 6 Jul 2010 00:18:00 -0700

BORN IDENTITY:

Did Jesus Christ really exist, or is Christianity built upon a legend? Few scholars question Jesus' existence, but some enemies of Christianity are attempting to prove otherwise.

In a lawsuit against the Vatican, the Church was accused of inventing the story of Jesus' existence. Although the case was thrown out of court in February, 2006, the plaintiff, Luigi Cascioli, appealed, but ultimately his case was closed.

The argument against Jesus' existence was made public on CNN TV when Ellen Johnson, president of American Atheists, declared:

“The reality is there is not one shred of secular evidence there ever was a Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ and Christianity is a modern religion. And Jesus Christ is a compilation from other gods: Osiris, Mithras, who had the same origins, the same death as the mythological Jesus Christ.” - Ellen Johnson, atheist

Johnson and a blue-ribbon panel of religious leaders were discussing the question, “What happens after we die?” on a Larry King Live CNN broadcast. The usually unflappable King paused reflectively and then replied, “So you don’t believe there was a Jesus Christ?”

With an air of certainty, Johnson responded, “There was not. It is not what I believe; there is no secular evidence that JC, Jesus Christ, ever existed.”

King had no follow-up and went to a commercial break. No discussion of any evidence for or against Jesus’ existence was forthcoming. The international television audience was left wondering.¹

The Distance of the Planets from the Sun And Their Atmospheric Composition

noreply@blogger.com (ATOM) — Mon, 5 Jul 2010 07:53:00 -0700

Generally, the astronomical unit (AU) is measured as of the distance of the Earth from the Sun, which is often given as 92955800 miles (to greater or lesser accuracy in the average). An even more intriguing number, 959.62 is offered by some sources as a measurement "at unit distance", which suggests a similarity with the Nineveh

number, 1959552/fractal.

The aspect that we shall treat in this extract, however, concerns the use of Earth as always representing the unit one (1.0) on the scale of distances, since it has been taken to be the astronomical unit (AU) employed in astronomy today. When the Earth's distance from the Sun is taken as the unit one, then all of the other planets are measured in terms of a ratio of that particular number. In doing so, an apparent relationship of proportion is obtained. However, one might consider the selection of the distance of the Earth, the third planet in our solar system from the Sun, as representing an arbitrary choice.

From the perspective of ourselves, as human beings living on planet Earth, the choice would by no means appear to be arbitrary. But, from the perspective of the behavior of matter and energy, one might make a case for the choice of selection being better exercised by utilizing the planet Mercury as the unit one, given the fact that it is the closest planet to the Sun in our solar system.

The corresponding numbers for the proportional representation, utilizing the planet Earth as the unit one for measurement, are given below:

We have employed the numbers rounded off that are generally cited in textbooks and almanacs. From the previous table, generally the break is shown to exist between Saturn and Uranus. One set of precise numbers is given in the brackets, but these would vary as the interpretations of the mean distances vary themselves. Ultimately, one would choose numbers and then make the necessary adjustments depending upon the set of numbers chosen.

Another alternative set of numbers, brought to my attention by Mr. Jim Branson would produce the following modifications in the numbers:

These numbers would produce distinct relationships, but all within the mean distances. For example, the numbers would produce a range relating to Venus' orbital timing.

1.846153846 halves down to .057692308 [maya long count fractal]

1.868594626 halves down to .0058393582

Nevertheless, the range of numbers is what interests us as of the planet Mercury being identified as the unit one for the measurement.

With such a set of numbers, a sense of proportion is offered, with the defining unit of measurement falling within the extremes of the planets revolving around the Sun, falling upon the third planet within the system, the Earth [1.0]. However, on the other hand, we shall utilize the planet Mercury as the unit one, whose mean distance from the Sun is cited as 36,000,000 miles, for the astronomical unit in this case. Therefore, a distinct sense of proportion obtains and the numbers appear to make more sense in computations regarding the orbital times. Furthermore, one cannot help but notice the direct relationship that the figure 36,000,000 holds for the ancient reckoning system and the maya long count (360c) nor, for the ancient kemi calendrical count (360c). One might even suspect that the ancients employed this particular distance given the nature of the ancient reckoning system itself.

The numbers/fractals may vary, depending upon the measurements taken for the system. For example, if we take the 92955800 miles often given for the Earth measurement, then, in relation to the 36,000,000 miles cited for Mercury, all of the the ratios shall change.

92955800 / 36000000 = 2.582105556

The problem in the computations comes regarding the mean distances and their averages, given the fact that we are not dealing with perfect circles in the planets' orbits. But, we shall understand that as the numbers selected change, the ratios change and adjustments must be made. For our purposes, we shall employ some of the numbers commonly offered in textbooks on astronomy. The 93000000 miles figure often cited would also produce a distinct ratio: 93000000 / 36000000 = 2.58333333. The significant point to understand in this brief extract concerns the use of the distance of Mercury from the Sun as the astronomical unit (AU) ---36,000,000 miles, and not the 93,000,000 miles commonly employed. It is this selective choice that shall determine the patterns discerned below.

Let us offer the numbers as of the system of measurement utilizing the planet Mercury as the unit one (1.0). The corresponding numbers for the ratios would then be:

Now, a sense of proportion becomes even more definite and comprehensible. The system now stretches from 1.0 to 101.333, almost a perfect 1 – 100 system of proportion; something that mentally, we can easily grasp.

Initially, we may also observe a cut-off point within the progression, whereby a significant jump appears between Mars and Jupiter: This jump in distance suggests a mid-point between the two planets, and also suggests a pattern. This particular pattern, as we shall observe, also appears to follow the atmospheric composition of the different planets, as we shall discuss below.

It were as though two distinct progressions appear within the pattern:

a) 1.0 to 3.8974358

b) 13.333 to 101.333

Now, let us review the atmospheric composition of the planets:

Mercury:
Major: 42% Oxygen (O2); 29% Sodium (Na); 22% Hydrogen (H2); 6% Helium (He); 0.5% Potassium (K); Minor: possible trace amounts of Argon (Ar), Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Water (H2O), Nitrogen (N2), Xenon (Xe), Krypton (Kr), Neon (Ne).

Venus:
Major: 96.5% Carbon Dioxide (CO2); 3.5% Nitrogen (N2); Minor (ppm): Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) - 150; Argon (Ar) - 70; Water (H2O); Carbon Monoxide (CO) - 17; Helium (He) - 12; Neon (Ne) - 7.

Earth:
Major: 78.084% Nitrogen (N); 20.946% Oxygen (O2); Minor (ppm): Argon (Ar) - 9340; Carbon Dioxide (CO2) - 350; Neon (Ne) - 18.18; Helium (He) - 5.24; CH4 - 1.7; Krypton (Kr) - 1.14; Hydrogen (H2) - 0.55.

Mars:
Major: Carbon Dioxide (CO2) - 95.32%; Nitrogen (N2) - 2.7%; Argon (Ar) - 1.6%; Oxygen (O2) - 0.13%; Carbon Monoxide (CO) - 0.08% Minor (ppm): Water (H2O) - 210; Nitrogen Oxide (NO) - 100; Neon (Ne) - 2.5; Hydrogen-Deuterium-Oxygen (HDO) - 0.85; Krypton (Kr) - 0.3); Xenon (Xe) - 0.08.

Jupiter:
Major: Molecular hydrogen (H2) - 89.8% (2.0%); Helium (He) - 10.2% (2.0%) Minor (ppm): Methane (CH4) - 3000 (1000); Ammonia (NH2) - 260 (40); Hydrogen Deuteride (HD) - 28 (10); Ethane (C2H6) - 5.8 (1.5) (uncertainty in parentheses)

Saturn:
Major: Molecular hydrogen (H2) - 96.3% (2.4%); Helium (He) - 3.25% (2.4%); Minor (ppm): Methane (CH4) - 4500 (2000); Ammonia (NH3) - 125 (75); Hydrogen Deuteride (HD) - 110 (58); Ethane (C2H6) - 7 (1.5) (uncertainty in parentheses)

Uranus:
Major: Molecular hydrogen (H2) - 82.5% (3.3%); Helium (He) - 15.2% (3.3%) Minor (ppm): Hydrogen Deuteride (HD) - ~148

Neptune:
Major: Molecular hydrogen (H2) - 80.0% (3.2%); Helium (He) - 19.0% (3.2%); Minor (ppm): Hydrogen Deuteride (HD) - ~192; Ethane (C2H6) - ~1.5 (uncertainty in parentheses)

Pluto:
Methane (CH4); Nitrogen (N2)

Correlation Between Distance of Planets from the Sun and
Major Elements of Atmospheric Composition

With this illustration, it is now possible to view the two distinct progressions and their corresponding atmospheric compositions for each planet.

The use of the unit one for Mercury on the scale also allows for many other observations regarding the ancient reckoning system.

The ancient kemi system is based upon the 108c, and one could even suspect a relationship with the previous system of notation. Consider, for example, the 108c in relation to Venus' synodic measurement, that is often cited in the historical record.

108 / 585 = .184615385

This fractal expression reflects exactly the proportional relationship regarding the distance of Mercury and Venus (1.846153846), as we have seen above.

Furthermore, the 1846153(846153) number/fractal doubles to an historically significant number/fractal:

1.846153846

7.384615384
14.76923077
29.53846154
59.07692307
...
7561.846153	[Note: the baseline 756c of the Great Pyramid]

Note how the 576c fractal occurs with the 1846153 factor.

Hence, 7561.846153 / 1.846153846	=	4096
		2048
		1024
		512
		256	[Note: constant number series]

The constant number series cuts off the 756c at a very interesting level: thirteen (13).

1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, is the thirteenth number on the series. The significance of the number thirteen in the ancient reckoning system has been discussed extensively in the Earth/matriX essays.

From the aforementioned, one cannot only utilize, then, the ancient reckoning numbers/fractals for computations of orbital times of the planets, but also for distances.

The fractal number that corresponds to the planet Earth, 2.56410256 is suggestive of the ancient 1001c number/fractal, which produces mirrored numbers.

1001 x 256 = 256256

1000001 x 256 = 256000256 [ - 256410256 = 410000]

By utilizing the planet Mercury as the unit one for the proportional relationship of the system of planets, then, the planet Venus reflects a numerical expression that is to be found in the ancient reckoning system (1.846153846). Furthermore, the planet Earth, on this same scale, now occupies a numerical expression that reflects the concept of a constant number series (256c).

From this perspective, were the planet Earth to be employed as an even-numbered constant series, then the relationship with Venus would vary theoretically. If Earth were actually the 2.56c constant number series, then Venus would represent the numerical expression of 1.8432, which forms part of the maya long count.

2.56 x .72 =	1.8432
	.9216
	.4608
	.2304
	.1152
	.576
	.288
	.144
	.36

In other words, in this theoretical system, Mercury represents the unit one (1.0); Venus represents the maya long count (1.8432); and Earth represents the constant number series (2.56c). This specific relationship reflects the very nature of the workings of the maya long count itself.

The entire, theoretically ideal system would be as follows:

Far too many relationships exist between the actual and the theoretically ideal numbers, in relation to the ancient reckoning system, to draw attention to them in this short extract. But, just a few may be cited:

By utilizing the numbers/fractals between the actual system (where Mercury is taken as unit one), and the theoretically ideal system (where Earth is 2.56c), one is able to make adjustments in the computations. These adjustments reveal direct relationships with the ancient reckoning system. The ease with which one flows from computing distance and time for the planets, leads one to believe that the ancient reckoning system may have done just that. The ancients may have been computing not only time, but as we have frequently suggested, they may have been computing distance as well.

And, it should be stated, that if they did not do so, well, at the very least, their reckoning system could have done such computations without any problem.

Consider:

And, the most obvious relationship between Earth and Venus is:

2.56410256 / 1.846153846 = 1.388888889

and, we know what this particular number is capable of doing, for example, regarding the maya companion numbers:

1385540 / 1366560 = 1388888889

In this expression, we may be witnessing a symbolic expression of the planet Earth (1385540) and the planet Venus (1366560), given the proportional relationship of the numbers and their corresponding relationship to the distance of these planets from the Sun.

This may explain why the maya companion number 1385540 relates to the 365c of Earth, but not to the 360c, which may represent Venus.

1385540 / 365 = 3796 [Note double the calendar round fractal, 18980c]

but,

1385540 / 360 = 3848.7222222 [An unpleasant fraction]

1366560 / 365 = 3744

1366560 / 360 = 3796

Then, note, however:

3848.7222222 / 2	=	1924.3611
		962.18055
		481.090275	[Note the height of the Great Pyramid is computed to be 481.5 feet]

The patterns become obvious:

Now, consider, the proportion as of the measurement of miles in distance:

36 / 3675	=	.009795918
		.019591837
Mercury 36 / .01959552	=	1837.154615 Pluto
Mercury 36 / .00979776	=	3674.30923 Pluto

In this sense, one could imagine the Nineveh number/fractal serving as a factor for the entire solar system of planetary bodies. One cannot but suspect an underlying relationship of the 1959552 Nineveh number/fractal.

Now, if the entire system from Mercury to Pluto represents the Nineveh number/fractal of 1959552, then we may know the relationship to the apparent break between Mars and Jupiter. Consider the following:

Observations:
The Astronomical Unit: 36,000,000 miles

No matter where one looks, significant numbers appear when a system of computations follows the numbers and fractals of the ancient reckoning system. We have seen how the pattern of the distance of the planets, when based on the planet Mercury as the unit one, reflects a similarity with the pattern established by the atmospheric composition of the planets. The astronomical unit (AU) based upon the mean distance of the planet Mercury from the Sun reflects approximately 36,000,000 miles, a number/fractal that is directly relevant to the ancient reckoning system. The two internal progressions of the pattern established by the distances of the planets from the Sun, reflect a similar division with regard to the elements that make up the atmospheric composition of the planets.

***

The Planets (plus the Dwarf Planet Pluto)

Our solar system consists of the sun, eight planets, moons, many dwarf planets (or plutoids), an asteroid belt, comets, meteors, and others. The sun is the center of our solar system; the planets, their moons, a belt of asteroids, comets, and other rocks and gas orbit the sun.

The eight planets that orbit the sun are (in order from the sun): Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune. Another large body is Pluto, now classifies as a dwarf planet or plutoid. A belt of asteroids (minor planets made of rock and metal) lies between Mars and Jupiter. These objects all orbit the sun in roughly circular orbits that lie in the same plane, the ecliptic (Pluto is an exception; it has an elliptical orbit tilted over 17° from the ecliptic).

Easy ways to remember the order of the planets (plus Pluto) are the mnemonics: "My Very Excellent Mother Just Sent Us Nine Pizzas" and "My Very Easy Method Just Simplifies Us Naming Planets" The first letter of each of these words represents a planet - in the correct order.

The largest planet is Jupiter. It is followed by Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Earth, Venus, Mars, Mercury, and finally, tiny Pluto (the largest of the dwarf planets). Jupiter is so big that all the other planets could fit inside it.

The Inner Planets vs. the Outer Planets
The inner planets (those planets that orbit close to the sun) are quite different from the outer planets (those planets that orbit far from the sun).

The inner planets are: Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars. They are relatively small, composed mostly of rock, and have few or no moons.
The outer planets include: Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto (a dwarf planet). They are mostly huge, mostly gaseous, ringed, and have many moons (again, the exception is Pluto, the dwarf planet, which is small, rocky, and has one large moon plus two tiny ones).

Temperatures on the Planets
Generally, the farther from the Sun, the cooler the planet. Differences occur when the greenhouse effect warms a planet (like Venus) surrounded by a thick atmosphere.

Density of the Planets
The outer, gaseous planets are much less dense than the inner, rocky planets.

The Earth is the densest planet. Saturn is the least dense planet; it would float on water.

The Mass of the Planets
Jupiter is by far the most massive planet; Saturn trails it. Uranus, Neptune, Earth, Venus, Mars, and Pluto are orders of magnitude less massive.

Gravitational Forces on the Planets
The planet with the strongest gravitational attraction at its surface is Jupiter. Although Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune are also very massive planets, their gravitational forces are about the same as Earth. This is because the gravitational force a planet exerts upon an object at the planet's surface is proportional to its mass and to the inverse of the planet's radius squared

A Day on Each of the Planets
A day is the length of time that it takes a planet to rotate on its axis (360°). A day on Earth takes almost 24 hours.

The planet with the longest day is Venus; a day on Venus takes 243 Earth days. (A day on Venus is longer than its year; a year on Venus takes only 224.7 Earth days).

The planet with the shortest day is Jupiter; a day on Jupiter only takes 9.8 Earth hours! When you observe Jupiter from Earth, you can see some of its features change.

The Average Orbital Speed of the Planets
As the planets orbit the Sun, they travel at different speeds. Each planet speeds up when it is nearer the Sun and travels more slowly when it is far from the Sun (this is Kepler's Second Law of Planetary Motion).