<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Chris Testa</title>
	
	<link>http://www.christesta.com</link>
	<description>Grammy Award Winning Producer / Engineer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 02:46:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/christestablog" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="christestablog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>great Black Keys quote…</title>
		<link>http://www.christesta.com/2011/12/great-black-keys-quote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.christesta.com/2011/12/great-black-keys-quote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 22:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christesta.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[whether or not you&#8217;re a fan, I think that people who love the Black Keys love the vintage aspect of their sound. People make a lot of assumptions about sound and the art making process in general.. but as Dan &#8230; <a href="http://www.christesta.com/2011/12/great-black-keys-quote/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whether or not you&#8217;re a fan, I think that people who love the Black Keys love the vintage aspect of their sound.  People make a lot of assumptions about sound and the art making process in general.. but as Dan explains&#8230; it&#8217;s never what it totally seems&#8230; <img src='http://www.christesta.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re going through all of these tubes and transformers, so tape is not as necessary.  We&#8217;ve gone through a lot of gear: you find out what works for you, what gets those sounds.  But it has less to do with tape then it does with miking techniques and the arrangements.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dan Auerbach in Electronic musician&#8230; </p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christesta.com/2011/12/great-black-keys-quote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>making the most of opportunities</title>
		<link>http://www.christesta.com/2011/11/making-the-most-of-opportunities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.christesta.com/2011/11/making-the-most-of-opportunities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christesta.com/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sure most people who don&#8217;t work on records might feel that it&#8217;s all fun with a little bit of work, unfortunately, most of the time it&#8217;s a little bit of fun with a lot of work. But every now &#8230; <a href="http://www.christesta.com/2011/11/making-the-most-of-opportunities/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure most people who don&#8217;t work on records might feel that it&#8217;s all fun with a little bit of work, unfortunately, most of the time it&#8217;s a little bit of fun with a lot of work.  But every now and then you really get an opportunity to rethink the ways you do things.  <span id="more-242"></span>I recently had the opportunity of working with Ryan Monroe.  Ryan Monroe is an exceptional musician who plays in the band Band of Horses.  He asked me to make his first solo record and I happily accepted.  I wasn&#8217;t really sure what was in store but I was about to find out when we finally met up on the first day.  I had a general idea of how I would go about things based on the material that I heard and the studio and the situation of Ryan playing everything on his own (overdubbing), but things changed as soon as we both sat down together at the console on day 1.  I&#8217;m not exactly sure what Ryan said but it was basically like… &#8220;Dude… do whatever you want… no rules.. let&#8217;s just have a ton of fun!!&#8221;… I&#8217;ve heard these words before and I&#8217;ve learned to approach them with some skepticism but this situation seemed different.  So I said &#8220;fuck it&#8221;.  I thought to myself that I&#8217;d be a fool to be handed an opportunity like this and not take advantage of it.  These opportunities don&#8217;t come up every day in a world where fast and cheap are the norm.  So I instantly thought back to the very first recordings I did when I knew nothing.  If I wanted to mic an instrument I put a mic in front of it and turned up the mic pre.  I figured that was a good place to start.  After awhile of setting things up and just listening I realized that was also a good place to end.  Even though I was in a nice studio with tons of options that doesn&#8217;t mean that options = better.  Simple is good.  Some people stay on simple and never leave (the Ramones) and for some it takes years to come back to simple.  I decided that I didn&#8217;t need any eq or compression.  I was happy with what I was hearing.  That&#8217;s usually a good place to leave things.  It forced me to spend a bit more time getting the source sound as good as possible, picking the appropriate mic, and putting that mic in the proper place.  As we kept moving on with our setup process (Ryan was playing every instrument on this record and singing.  I decided that the best way to do things was to set up every chain and get basic sounds.) I realized that I could benefit from recording everything in one room.  Since the entire record was going to be recorded one instrument at a time this was possible.  Also, I could keep all the best quality microphones plugged up in the same room and just use any chain for any instrument.  Once I got everything going and I finally got to the patch bay in the control room I started to think a bit differently about that as well.  I thought, since everything can be used for anything, I might as well start bringing things up on the console in a way that reflected that.  So I started patching things up on the console in order or what I perceived to be general tonal quality… a big full hi fi bright sound down to smaller, lo-fi ribbony sound.  Kind of like a Crayola box of sound.  It took the gear out of the equation and just focused on the sound color.  The final step was setting up my Pro Tools session.  Since everything was different at this point I kept going.  I didn&#8217;t drastically change the way I do things but I did just start labeling things with more adjectives rather than nouns.  It seemed more appropriate and fit into the overall thought process.  Again, all of these things were a possibility because I knew I&#8217;d be the only one involved from beginning to end.  That really left the door wide open to try things that I had never done before.  Making a record can be an extremely technical process for the person making it and any opportunity to inject as much artistic thought into the building block process is always a good thing.</p>
<p>As the record continued to the mix stage things came together into the process that I&#8217;ve had for awhile… but it was nice to know that they started off in a much different place.  It can be easy to surprise yourself but sometimes, especially within a collaboration, the opportunity needs to be there first.  Once that is there, then it&#8217;s up to you to do the same old same old or challenge yourself.  I&#8217;m glad I got the opportunity to walk through the door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christesta.com/2011/11/making-the-most-of-opportunities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insightful Eric Valentine quote….</title>
		<link>http://www.christesta.com/2011/09/insightful-eric-valentine-quote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.christesta.com/2011/09/insightful-eric-valentine-quote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christesta.com/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems like everyone has an opinion on digital recording&#8230;I read this quote by Eric Valentine (if you don&#8217;t know who he is and you make records then&#8230; ) and it was such a perfect way of describing exactly how &#8230; <a href="http://www.christesta.com/2011/09/insightful-eric-valentine-quote/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like everyone has an opinion on digital recording&#8230;I read this quote by Eric Valentine (if you don&#8217;t know who he is and you make records then&#8230; ) and it was such a perfect way of describing exactly how I feel that I felt I needed to post it&#8230; I couldn&#8217;t have said it any better&#8230; it&#8217;s never the tools&#8230; it&#8217;s the skills.. <span id="more-178"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;It is easy to get caught up in the idea that &#8220;if only had this converter or that clock or did this at a higher sample rate my mix would be sounding bigger, clearer, wider, better image, just better&#8230;.etc&#8221; I have definitely caught myself making those excuses for myself at times. I believe they are just excuses though. Especially in the digital domain, I believe 99.99% of the end result comes from how things are recorded, how they are EQ&#8217;d, compressed and balanced. And of those 4 things EQing is by far the most important. I call it &#8220;voicing&#8221;. The voicing of a mix has the most significant impact on how clear, punchy, big, open, wide things sound. I have to remind myself this all the time, but if I am struggling with a mix it is not the equipment&#8217;s fault it is my fault.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christesta.com/2011/09/insightful-eric-valentine-quote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inspiration Pt 1</title>
		<link>http://www.christesta.com/2011/09/inspiration-pt-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.christesta.com/2011/09/inspiration-pt-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 04:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christesta.com/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[is a random idea as possible to inspire as an emotionally inspired idea? are they the same? where is emotion coming from? memory and insight or just randomness?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is a random idea as possible to inspire as an emotionally inspired idea?  are they the same?  where is emotion coming from?  memory and insight or just randomness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christesta.com/2011/09/inspiration-pt-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beastie Boys Tribute</title>
		<link>http://www.christesta.com/2011/08/beastie-boys-tribute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.christesta.com/2011/08/beastie-boys-tribute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 01:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christesta.com/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is an article I wrote for www.somuchsilence.com about my favorite Hip Hop record.. the Beastie Boys &#8220;Check Your Head&#8221; I Used to Love H.E.R.: Chris Testa (Grammy Award-winning producer/engineer) Thursday April 21st 2011, 9:25 am by Kevin The 53rd &#8230; <a href="http://www.christesta.com/2011/08/beastie-boys-tribute/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an article I wrote for www.somuchsilence.com about my favorite Hip Hop record.. the Beastie Boys &#8220;Check Your Head&#8221;<span id="more-81"></span></p>
<p><a title="Permanent Link: I Used to Love H.E.R.: Chris Testa (Grammy Award-winning producer/engineer)" href="http://somuchsilence.com/?p=4890" rel="bookmark"><br />
I Used to Love H.E.R.: Chris Testa (Grammy Award-winning producer/engineer)</a></p>
<div>Thursday April 21st 2011, 9:25 am by Kevin</div>
<p><em>The 53rd installment of <a href="http://somuchsilence.com/?cat=40" target="_blank">I Used to Love H.E.R.</a>, a series in which artists/bloggers/writers discuss their most essential or favorite hip-hop albums and songs, comes from Los Angeles-based producer/mixer/engineer <a href="http://www.christesta.com/" target="_blank">Chris Testa</a>, who won <a href="http://www.grammy.com/nominees/search?artist=Testa&amp;title=&amp;year=All&amp;genre=All" target="_blank">three Grammys</a> for his work on the Dixie Chicks’ 2006 album Taking the Long Way.</em></p>
<p>Chris’ <a href="http://www.christesta.com/discography/" target="_blank">resume is extensive</a>, and he’s become the go-to guy for several Phoenix/Tempe bands, including <a href="http://www.jimmyeatworld.com/" target="_blank">Jimmy Eat World</a>, <a href="http://www.sourcevictoria.net/" target="_blank">Source Victoria</a>, <a href="http://www.kinchband.com/home/" target="_blank">Kinch</a> and <a href="http://www.reubensaccomplice.com/" target="_blank">Reubens Accomplice</a>(2011 should be a <a href="http://somuchsilence.com/?p=4417" target="_blank">big year</a>).</p>
<p><em>I’ve pestered Chris for a while now about doing this, and it turned out to be worth the wait. Just when I thought that maybe he’d forgotten, he emailed me this obviously passionate post about an album he calls “hip-hop’s most creative record” – on the exact 19th anniversary (April 21, 1992) of its release, no less.</em></p>
<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d1/Beastieboys_checkyourhead.jpg" alt="check your head" width="145" height="145" align="left" hspace="5" /><span style="font-size: medium;"><strong>Beastie Boys, Check Your Head<br />
(Capitol, 1992)</strong></span></p>
<p>I was high the first time I heard <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000TEPD6I/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=somucsil-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=217145&amp;creative=399349&amp;creativeASIN=B000TEPD6I" target="_blank"><em>Check Your Head</em></a> … in my friend’s car at a party in Jersey. He had bought it and was freaking on it. I remember walking down into the basement of this party and seeing him see me and stop the cassette player, hit eject, grab a cassette and say, “Dude, you gotta hear this!” We went out to his car, smoked one and I heard it for the fist time. It was so fresh … so FRESH. The first track was more creative than most full hip-hop records (although calling it hip-hop could just be limiting what it really is). It’s one of the funkiest records of all time. Completely done in their own style, taking a real understanding of the past and totally doing something new with it. I feel in some way every great hip-hop record is basically a tribute to yourself and how “bad” you are. They’re proving grounds, but it was really about how creative you can be that makes <em>Check Your Head</em> the top contender. The thing is that the Beasties got their groove, whether it’s programmed music, fully live, or just a DJ, but their decision to start playing more themselves (and the brilliant production of Mario Caldato Jr.) just enforced their style on all parts of the sounds. This was the first record where everything coming at you was them (any samples seem more like them sampling themselves, minus the super obvious ones). It was a huge leap into a totally different thing than anyone expected. Most people never even knew they played. It was awesome to see “Bass: MCA, Drums: Mike D and Gtr: Ad-Rock”. I didn’t know what to think … all I can remember was a state of disbelief that their playing was something they just hadn’t shown us yet. How often are you that surprised by what your favorite bands do? I have an answer – rarely ever. At the time I was heavily into all of the pioneers of funk like James Brown, Sly Stone, P Funk, the Meters and every other band that introduced the word to the deep groove. The Beastie Boys were just like a lot of their heros from the ’70s, innovators in their time by making something new of that past … they had it all together. If you look back now at their clothes, their guitars, their fucking drum heads for that matter … all totally new and different from what was going on at the time, yet a total homage to everything that was cool in the past. They were reinventing, and it was dope.</p>
<p>There’s so many things that the Beasties really innovated with <em>Check Your Head</em>. It’s hard to think of just one, so I’m going to break it down:</p>
<p><strong>Their humor</strong></p>
<p>I think one of the main things that everyone related to that existed through all of their records was their humor. Let’s face it: They were funny at shit. Just watch any video. It’s not easy to take something that’s initially funny and twist it into something cool, but they managed to do that all the time. I mean, “The Biz v. The Nuge”… I mean, Biz Markie was a decently big rap star at the time, but Ted Nugent, he had nothing going on. It’s almost like what Quentin Tarantino did with John Travolta. “Let’s pick the most underappreciated artist and hip people back onto them.” Who else would have put a Ted Nugent sample on their record? They pulled the greatest out of the most random people and references, like grabbing Jimmie Walker’s “Dy-No-Mite!” before anyone else did.</p>
<p><strong>The shout-outs</strong></p>
<p>Buddy Rich, Rufus Thomas, Bob Dylan, Minnie the Moocher, Grady Tate, Jimi Hendrix, Stevie Wonder – it’s the history of groundbreaking music</p>
<p><strong>The lyrics</strong></p>
<p>Lyrically I don’t think anyone ever really expected anything for the B Boys after their first record, but they did introduce a lot of people to Buddhism on this record with Yauch’s track <em>Namaste</em>. Their wise-ass-ness from the first two records seemed to turn into intelligent sarcasm with style, and is it me or is “Funky Boss” really “Fuck Your Boss”?</p>
<p><strong>The message</strong></p>
<p>The message was straight off an early Sly and the Family Stone record. <em>Stand Together</em>,<em>Time for Livin’</em>, <em>Gratitude</em>, <em>Namaste</em> – bringing people together and paying thanks, almost non-existent in hip-hop music today. Their group camaraderie made them seem like a gang. Almost all hip-hop acts at the beginning were groups, not solo artists. The Beastie Boys continued that tradition. The Ghetto Boys, Public Enemy, NWA, the Furious Five, Run-DMC, the Fat Boys, Cypress Hill, De La Soul, A Tribe Called Quest – all groups that fed off each other, respected each other, wrote songs and rhymes with each of the other guys in mind. in order to share the wealth you need to have respect and to give room to others and collaborate on views and opinions. The mentality today in rap is virtually incapable of doing that … collaborating requires skill as well.</p>
<p><strong>The sonics</strong></p>
<p>Sonically it was an entirely different thing than they had done and, by far, miles apart from any hip-hop record of the time – distortion, delays, spooky reverbs, percussion, mixed-up samples. It took <em>Paul’s Boutique</em> to a higher yet rawer level … way more stoner. It combined everything in hip-hop, rock, punk and funk, something that had never been done before. The record was made with DATs, four-tracks, two-inch tape, cassettes and anything else that they could record to. Sonically it was super creative without ever really caring about how it sonically sounded – as long as it grooved and had attitude it was kept.</p>
<p><strong>Their studio</strong></p>
<p>The Beastie Boys were so far ahead of anyone with the creation of their own studio, G-Son Studios. No one had their own studio in 1992. Well, maybe some very famous session musicians or someone like Neil Young, but certainly no rock bands and definitely no hip-hop groups. They realized early on (and supposedly their decision to create their own place came out of the massive expense of <em>Paul’s Boutique</em>, the studio time and the sample clearance) that they needed a spot to relax and find their own groove and sound without worrying about the clock, a concept most people didn’t get into until about 10 years later. The whole record was recorded and mixed there. It was punk hip-hop, especially since it was in a shitty part of town in a building that they couldn’t even start recording in until 6 p.m.</p>
<p><strong>The tracks</strong></p>
<p>The standout tracks in my mind were almost too many to list. That’s why the record is so great. They’re all standout tracks – every one.</p>
<p>It was one of those records that made you feel more like a badass when you listened to it. It’s one of those few records that make you feel stoned even when you’re not. And if you are, shit, it’s way better. It sounds as fresh today as it did that night in Jersey sitting in that car hearing it for the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christesta.com/2011/08/beastie-boys-tribute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

