PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL:
The information in this e-mail (which includes any files transmitted with it) is confidential to All Branded CD & DVD Limited. It is intended for the addressee only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. It is not to be relied upon by any person other than the addressee except with our prior written approval. If no such approval is given, we will not accept any liability (in negligence or otherwise) arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on such information. Unauthorized recipients are required to maintain confidentiality. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify us immediately, destroy any copies and delete it from your computer system. Any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Copyright in this e-mail and any document created by us and sent as an attachment to this e-mail will be and remain vested in us and will not be transferred to you. We assert the right to be identified as the author of and to object to any misuse of the contents of this e-mail or such documents. Whilst we run anti-virus software on all internet e-mails we are not liable for any loss or damage. The recipient is advised to run their own anti-virus software. Nothing in this e-mail or any attachment shall be an acceptance of any offer previously made nor shall be itself an offer capable of acceptance to form a legally binding contract.

ITV Broadcasting Limited (Registration No. 955957) (“ITV”) is incorporated in England and Wales with its registered office at The London Television Centre, Upper Ground, London SE1 9LT. Please visit the official ITV website at www.itv.com for the latest company news.

The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential, may be privileged, may be subject to copyright and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email and you are not the intended recipient please notify postmaster@itv.com and delete this email and you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this email are strictly prohibited.

Although ITV routinely screens for viruses, recipients should scan this email and any attachments for viruses. ITV makes no representation or warranty that this email or any of its attachments is free of viruses or defects and does not accept any responsibility for any damage caused by any virus or defect transmitted by this email. ITV reserves the right to monitor all e mails and the systems upon which such e mails are stored or circulated.Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of ITV.

Thank You.

[Update, July 20: They're still at it, this time with a new name and company: James Hong, "Senior Consultant of domain name registration and solution center in china" and "one company which self-styled "Packs Co.,ltd" were applying to register [company name] as Network Brand
and following domain names".

If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck... [update ends]

From Jeff's blog entry;

This is clever and it took a bit of time to figure out the pathology.  But there is one, and it’s interesting. 

This approach is obviously personalized to the owner/manager of a commercial Internet brand and hints at risk to our online trademark (miproconsulting) due to a foreign application being made for our trademark name in country-specific flavors (.asia, .biz, .cc, .cn, .com. cn., .hk, etc.).  Being the nice foreign domain registrar they are, the sender of this message, SK Holdings, is asking us if we want to do business with them and secure all of themiproconsulting variants listed below so that we can protect our Internet brand from this foreign applicant.

Isn’t it nice that someone halfway across the globe is looking out for our best interests?  Makes me want to do business with them right away.

So, if you get one of these emails, be very careful! Here's the full transcript of my back-and-forth with this guy. Enjoy.

8th of April 2010: Lebron contacts us...

From: "lebron"
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 14:40:26 +0800
To: me
Subject: -Internet Copyright of revolverrecords-(To Principal)

Dear CEO/Principal,

We are a internet service provider and based in HongKong, which mainly deal with the global companies' domain name registration and internet intellectual property right protection. Currently, we have a pretty important issue needing to confirm with your company.

On Apr 7, 2010, we received an application formally, one company named "Vleoel Holdings Ltd" wanted to applied for the brand keyword "revolverrecords" and some domain names with our body.

During our preliminary investigation, we found that these domain names' keyword is identical with your name. I wonder whether you consigned Vleoel Holdings Ltd to register these domain names through us? Or is Vleoel Holdings Ltd your business partner or distributor in Asia? Currently, we have postponed this application of this company temporarily already. And this is a letter for confirmation. If you are not in charge of this please transfer this email to appropriate dept.

In order to deal with this issue better, please contact us by phone or email as soon as possible.

Best Regards.

Lebron

Lebron Zhu
Auditing  Director
Hong Kong Head Office:
Web: http://www.wtl.hk.cn
Tel: 00852-95660205
Fax: 00852-30696940
Mail: lebron@west-asia.com
lebron@west-cnnet.com
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

I humour him, and respond:

from：me
date：2010-04-09 02:22:28
to：lebron@west-asia.com
Subject：RE: -Internet Copyright of revolverrecords-(To Principal)

Hello Lebron,

My apologies for the delay in replying and thanks for bringing this matter to our attention.

This is certainly nothing to do with us - we have not authorised the use of our trademark or any of our other registered marks to this company. I also do not recognise the company name Vleoel Holdings Ltd, although I am aware of a "Velo Holdings" based in New York City in the USA, I can find no reference to "Vleoel Holdings" on the web - please could you confirm that "Vleoel Holdings" is correct?

Also, could you provide us with some more specific details regarding what exactly this other company was attempting to register? We take a very dim view of trademark and brand infringement, particularly if they are attempting to do business in the same market sector. We actively do business in Asian markets so this is of concern to us if they are attempting to impersonate the business or misuse its brand or trademarks.

Again, many thanks for emailing us and performing your due diligence. I await your response.

Regards
Christopher Woods

Darn it, I want to hate him already but he's just trying so hard. Watch him work it!

From: lebron [mailto:lebron@dnrcenter.hk]
Sent: 09 April 2010 02:08
To: me
Subject: Re: RE: -Internet Copyright of revolverrecords-
Importance: High

Dear Christopher.

I am glad you can contact me in time. If you have no relationship with Vleoel Holdings Ltd, according to our working experience, there are 2 possibilities.
1.Vleoel Holdings Ltd is a domain name investment company, they want to register these names before you and sell back to you to gain profits;
2.It may be a commercial method, Vleoel Holdings Ltd is consigned by your competitor to register, they are trying to replicate your idea and let your customers feel confusion.

We do not know that company's detail information. They applied to us online. They wants to apply the following domain names and brand keyword:
1.Domain names:
revolverrecords.asia
revolverrecords.info
revolverrecords.biz
revolverrecords.eu
revolverrecords.ru
revolverrecords.it
revolverrecords.fr
revolverrecords.cn
revolverrecords.com.cn
revolverrecords.com.hk
revolverrecords.com.tw
2.Brand keyword:
Revolverrecords

As the owner of "revolverrecords.com", you will get the priority to register these domain names and brand keyword. If you think these domain names are important to you, we can send you a dispute application form and help you register these domains within dispute period, this is the only way to prevent domain name from grabbing. But if you don't think their application will do harm to your profits, you can give up, we will finish their registration.

Hopefully you can give me your decision ASAP so that we can conduct the next step work.

Best Regards.

Lebron Zhu

I decide to give him a poke... and point out some of his fairly fundamental mistakes in his approach, just to see if he bites:

from：Revolver Music Limited - Legal
date：2010-04-09 19:03:22
to：'lebron'
cc：
Subject：RE: RE: -Internet Copyright of revolverrecords-

Lebron,

We already have a strong brand presence online - we've owned our major domain names and most variations for around 15 years, but we're always interested in protecting our trademark. However, we do not consider the domain names you have listed below as critical to our online presence - we will monitor these domain names and, should any of them be registered and attempt to replicate or duplicate our copyrights or trademarks, we will commence dispute arbitration proceedings with ADNDRC and ICANN should their content fall foul of the applicable rules to domain registration.

I am also aware of various Asia-based domain registration scams quite similar in content to your original email, so please excuse me if I am a little sceptical about this whole thing until I see more solid evidence.

Proactive domain dispute resolution has not been used by any major registrar for over a decade - NSI had a similar procedure set up for domain registrations in the 90s, but was dropped after 1999 when ICANN assumed overall control of the major TLDs. I oversee the registration of hundreds of domain names on a daily basis, and I have not once come across a 'dispute period' in the ten years or so I've been doing my job.

If you have any more information regarding 'Vleoel Holdings Ltd', please forward it to me because I can find no trace of this company on the web whatsoever, neither can I find any proof of its existence on a company register.

Best regards
Christopher Woods

AWWW, he didn't really take the bait! But still, it was fun.

From: lebron [mailto:lebron@dnrcenter.hk]
Sent: 12 April 2010 08:16
To: me
Subject: Re: RE: -Internet Copyright of revolverrecords-
Importance: High

Dear Christopher.

I think you have a good knowledge of domain names, you should know that domain name takes open registration (this is international domain name registration principle), As a domain
name registrar, we have no right to stop their application. This is also the reason we informed you this issue. I think you know some cases about the domain names grabbed by third
party, and also frequently happens internationally, we also don't hope that there will be some infringement on the interests of your company in the future.

On Apr 7, 2010 Vleoel Holdings Ltd has submitted the application to us, as domain name registration organization that authorized by government, we have to avoid the interference of
the third party, so we have protected these domain names. If you want to register these domain names yourself, we can send you a dispute application form to help you. Of course, if
you register in another place, we could do nothing to stop you. What we only can do is not notice you when the similar case happen in future.

We look forward to our first cooperation very much. We certainly need to respect your decision.Have a nice day.

Best Regards.

Lebron Zhu

NOTE: Information in this email is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee only. If you have received it in error please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system. You should not otherwise copy it, retransmit it, use or disclose its contents unless permission to do so is explicitly stated. Views expressed in personal emails do not necessarily reflect the position or opinion of the Liberal Democrats.

This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. If you have received this e-mail and/or
attachment in error, please notify the sender immediately and
delete the e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you
are not the intended recipient you must not copy, distribute,
disclose or use the contents of the e-mail or any attachment.

All e-mail sent to or from this address may be accessed by
someone other than the recipient for system management and
security reasons or for other lawful purposes.

Airbus Operations Limited does not accept liability for any
damage or loss which may be caused by software viruses.

Airbus Operations Limited is registered in England and Wales
under company number 3468788. The company's registered office
is at New Filton House, Filton, Bristol, BS99 7AR.

Anyway, if you use phpns - or any CMS which uses TinyMCE for WYSIWYG text entry / editing - you'll find that if you embed code like YouTube links in code view, switch back to WYSIWYG view, then switch back to code view again... All your lovely embed codes are gone!

This was really annoying me, so I decided to have a hunt about for a quick 'n dirty solution. After lots of forum reading, a few things were clear:

• TinyMCE won't let you easily disable its code cleaning / HTML verification, which sucks
• Even the TinyMCE devs aren't quite sure how to efficiently stop this from happening
• Trying to fully disable its HTML verification / cleanup routines is nigh-on impossible, the codebase is a spider's web of PHP
• and by default, it hates all <object> and <embed> tags, even if you have the TinyMCE Flash plugin installed.

This can royally screw with your meticulously-entered YouTube embeds. However, on his blog, Akbar neatly demonstrates a simple but effective method to stop TinyMCE eating your embed code - and all you need to do is add the object and embed tags and possible variables... There's a full demo, with borrowable code, on his web site.

After looking in all the nooks and crannies, I found a few useful sites:

For reviews, statistics and comparisons of tyres, I found three useful sites:
TyreReview (http://www.tyrereviews.co.uk/Tyre/Goodyear/DuraGrip.htm)
Tyres-Online (http://www.tyres-online.co.uk/tyretest/goodyear.asp#1)
BlackCircles (http://www.blackcircles.com/order/tyres/search)

And a couple of reputable-looking brokers:
etyres (quote for GoodYear DuraGrips: £161.80 inc VAT)
TyreFitDirect (quote for GoodYear DuraGrips: £152.82 inc VAT)

I decided to give etyres a go. Unfortunately, given the less popular dimensions of my tyre (185/55/R14/80H), etyres could only promise me fitting with a two-week lead time, as they'd have to order the tyres I wanted specially (I was after GoodYear DuraGrips). As I had a flat tyre, was running on the spare and had to drive down the motorway the day afterwards, I wussed out and went to my local Kwik Fit - where they knocked about £60 off a pair of Michelin Energy Savers, which I was happy with.

Including fitting and balance, two tyres came to £180, which isn't amazing... but isn't bad for a walk-up price with half an hour's notice, and was nowhere near as bad as I thought it would cost. Certainly it would've been nice to pay less, but when you have no other options, what do you do? To their credit, I didn't have to wait long and my tyres were fitted quickly, so no complaints there. Apparently Kwik Fit also do rotating promotions on various kinds of tyres; when I went in, they (ironically) had a sliding discount promotion on GoodYears for February. Sod's law though, they didn't have the DuraGrips in my tyre size! so I plumped for Michelins (they did have cheaper tyres, but I wanted some premium rubber this time around after a few recent close shaves in rush hour traffic).

The moral of the story? If you need tyres fitting really quickly, don't solely rely on the online brokers and on-site mechanic companies being able to supply your tyres at very short notice. However, if you want to save some money, you can haggle with your local garage... or plan ahead and book with an online broker (like etyres or TyreFitDirect), get your tyres changed at your home or workplace and save a few bob. Don't let my bad experience put you off - I'm also keen to know if you've used any online tyre services, so if you've had good or bad experiences (including etyres or TyreFitDirect) then please leave a comment.

Once again, corporate email policy results in signatures longer than the emails (and this time, with the mailserver tacking another copy on to each reply). (Linebreaks added for legibility)

***********************************************************************
The information contained within this e-mail (and any attachment) sent
by Birmingham City Council is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended only for the named recipient or entity to whom it is
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient please accept our
apologies and notify the sender immediately, or telephone +(44)(0)121
464 4444. Unauthorised access, use, disclosure, storage or copying is
not permitted and may be unlawful. Any e-mail including its content may
be monitored and used by Birmingham City Council for reasons of security
and for monitoring internal compliance with the office policy on staff
use. E-mail blocking software may also be used. Any views or opinions
presented are solely those of the originator and do not necessarily
represent those of Birmingham City Council. We cannot guarantee that
this message or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted
and amended.

***********************************************************************

The reasons for why corporate email disclaimers are usually worth less than the electrons they're sent with is explained on Jeff's web site... To get us started, here's the email disclaimer from Scottish Widows (a part of Lloyds Banking Group, as they helpfully tell us) with linebreaks added for readability:

*******************************************************************************

As part of the Lloyds Banking Group, Scottish Widows is proud to be
an Official Provider of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games.
www.scottishwidows.co.uk/london2012

This E-Mail is confidential. Unauthorised recipients must notify the sender
immediately on 0131-655-6789 and must delete the original E-Mail without
taking a copy. We virus scan and monitor all e-mails but are not responsible
for any damage caused by a virus or alteration or our email by a third
party after transmission. The E-Mail is not intended nor should it be taken
to create any legal relations, contractual or otherwise.

The following companies are part of the Scottish Widows Group and,
with the exception of Scottish Widows Services Limited, are authorised
and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. They are all registered
in the United Kingdom:

Scottish Widows plc, Co No. 199549/FSA Register No. 191517;
Scottish Widows Annuities Limited, Co No.199550/FSA Register No. 191518;
Scottish Widows Services Limited, Co No.189975; Scottish Widows Unit
Funds Limited, Co No. 74809/FSA Register No. 202648; all having their
Registered Office at 69 Morrison Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8YF.

Scottish Widows Bank plc, Co No. 154554/FSA Register No. 201601.
Registered Office at 67 Morrison Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8YJ.

Scottish Widows Unit Trust Managers Limited, Co No. 1629925/FSA
Register Co No. 122129, Registered Office at Charlton Place,
Andover, Hampshire SP10 1RE.

Scottish Widows Investment Partnership Limited, Co No. 794936/FSA
Register Co No. 193707; SWIP Fund Management Limited,
Co No. 406604/FSA Register No. 122135 and SWIP Multi-Manager
Funds Limited, Co No. 5582499/FSA Register No. 455821; all having
their Registered Office at 33 Old Broad Street, London EC2N 1HZ.

Scottish Widows Fund Management Limited, Co No. 74517/FSA Register
No. 119359; Pensions Management (SWF) Limited, Co No. 45361/FSA
Register No. 110422; all having their Registered Office at
15 Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh, EH16 5BU.

Lloyds TSB Investments Limited, Co No. 106723/FSA Register No. 122130,
Registered Office at 60 Morrison Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8BE.

Scottish Widows Administration Services Limited, Co No. 1132760/FSA
Register No. 139398, Registered Office at 25 Gresham
Street, London, EC2V 7HN.

All of the above companies are part of the Lloyds Banking Group.

*******************************************************************************

In this case, the email disclaimer was over 5x longer than the content of the email - if I was feeling grumpier, I would've classified this message as spam.

More coming as/when I get them.