City of Brass

airline "security" after Detroit flight 253

Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:08:14 -0500

I didn't really hear the news about the British muslim of Nigerian descent who tried to blow up Detroit-bound Northwestern flight 253 until I arrived at the airport and read about it in discarded newspapers while waiting for 5 hours in transit in Chennai. The would-be bomber Abdulmuttalab is clearly another Richard Reid shoebomber type, with delusions of grandeur and ineptitude to match.

My personal interest in the story is heavily influenced by the fact that I was in transit when I learned about it, as its direct impact upon me was felt by the usual response of our airline security bureaucracy to incidents of this sort: treat passengers even further like a herd, instead of a pack. The concept of pack vs herd is a simple one: a pack hunts together, acts as one unit, and defends its whole against outside threats. A herd, in contrast, is a mass of particles that simply flow according to outside forces, loosely cohesive but utterly mindless. Think of wolves and cows as the iconic example.

The airline industry has long treated us like a herd, even though we, the passengers, are the sole reason for its existence. Shut up, sit down, walk here, walk there, wait here. Much of this is necessary due to simple need of efficiency but there's a mentality that has taken hold now, especially in the area of security, which rationalizes the passenger as a kind of enemy, or at least a necessary yet annoying burden which interferes with the noble ideal of moving planes around.

The story of Flight 253 is of a pack - the passengers themselves subdued the idiot, as they have done many times before (including on 9-11 itself). Yet the answer? new rules stating that on the final hour of the flight before landing, passengers may not stand up from their seats, use the restroom, or even take any items out of their personal carry ons - including those under the seat, not just those in the overhead. This is utterly insane. The logic of it is ludicrous - would these rules actually stop a committed saboteur? Why just the final hour of the flight? Why would there be anything in your carryons - which have passed through security already - be a sudden threat? And what if there was a real threat in that last hour - would a civic minded citizen hesitate to get up and act to save his fellow passengers if he saw something suspicious from a few aisles away? WIthout the ability (or rather, a severe disincentive) to even stand up and stroll over to see whats going on, the first line of defense is now effectively castrated.

Like almost everything else the security people come up with, these aren't rules for actual safety but solely to provide the appearance thereof. Having flown out of India I can personally vouch for the direction that our domestic industry is headed - towards a state where the passenger has no rights and ultimately is treated like cargo. A security policy that actively involves the passengers as an integral element to safety is one that would be robust enough to stop any attack, whereas these silly rules serve only to imperil us all.

Related - Talk Islam's excellent coverage of our hapless halfwit Abdulmuttalab's history and path to radicalization.

City of Brass

airline "security" after Detroit flight 253

Rotten in the state of Denmark: Chindia at Copenhagen

the view from Cuffe Parade

Democracy or Else: voting compulsory in Gujarat state

a satirical rickshaw

Echoes of the Raj

breakfast in Mumbai

my passage to India

Raudat Tahera at night

Welcome to Marol!

Saifee Masjid, Marol (Mumbai)

Muharram - Headed to Marol, Mumbai for Ashara

Discussing "homegrown muslim extremism" on NPR today

The Geminid Meteor Shower peaks tonight

word cloud and transcript: Obama's Nobel speech