An adviser to the commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force says Iran’s supply chain for the production of weapons and missiles remains fully intact.

In remarks on Saturday, Brigadier General Ali Balali said Iran has no concerns in any sector required for its defense production.

He added that all facilities and components required for missile production are manufactured domestically and are also exportable.

The senior IRGC commander emphasized that Iran has also drawn on its experience to make advances in air defense, drone production, and the space sector.

Balali further noted that the United States had copied Iran’s Shahed-136 drone, demonstrating that Washington had been unable to develop a similar platform despite its extensive research centers and think tanks.

“We can continue the fight for as long as necessary,” he said.

He noted that Iran relies on indigenous capabilities and a clear understanding of operational requirements to drive innovation in missile development, adding that the country has reached a level of maturity in the field that no longer requires foreign assistance.

“Since we are both the developers and manufacturers of these systems and also understand operational requirements, we continuously pursue innovation,” Balali said.

Balali’s remarks come as Iran’s transformation from dependence on foreign arms to a largely self-reliant military power—with advanced capabilities in missiles, drones, and other defense technologies—stands as a remarkable example of strategic adaptation under unjust sanctions.

On Friday, IRGC’s second-in-command Major General Mostafa Izadi said the country’s armed forces have made major advances in various technological fields and have “surprises” in store for their enemies.

He added that the Iranian armed forces have made major strides in the ground, air, air defense, and naval fields.

Source 

sraeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir claimed that all three administrative areas of the occupied West Bank “belong to Israel,” contradicting arrangements established under the Oslo Accords between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization.

Under the 1995 Oslo II Accord, the West Bank was divided into Areas A, B and C. Area A is under full Palestinian control, Area B is under Palestinian civilian and Israeli security control. Area C, which accounts for around 60% of the territory, is under full Israeli control.

“There is no difference between Areas A, B and C. The entire land is ours. This is our country,” Ben-Gvir told Israel’s right-wing Channel 14 on Thursday.

Ben-Gvir also threatened to dismantle the Palestinian Authority, and push for the displacement of Palestinians from West Bank and the Gaza Strip if he becomes the defense minister.

He claimed that 60% of Palestinians want to “emigrate,” despite reports to the contrary. “I will dedicate time to this, and I will manage the process continuously. Every week, I will hold a discussion involving all relevant parties,” he said.

Asked how Israel could provide additional forces for West Bank and Gaza, Ben-Gvir said: “It is very simple: The more you allow soldiers to shoot and use force, the less manpower you need.”

“I will remove the restrictions on our soldiers. Today, the police rules of engagement are much more lenient than those of the army,” he added, pointing to police use of gunfire against Palestinians.

Although Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has spoken about Palestinian displacement on several occasions, Ben-Gvir claimed the premier “did not want it enough” and blamed him for failing to advance such a policy.

The remarks come amid campaigning for Israel’s Oct. 27 Knesset election, as opinion polls indicate declining support for the governing coalition and gains for the opposition.

Ben-Gvir recently intensified threats against Palestinians amid heightened competition among Israeli parties, while also making repeated visits to Al-Aqsa Mosque in occupied East Jerusalem and performing Talmudic rituals at the Western Wall.

Source 

The crew of the hijacked flydubai plane shockingly clashed with heroic Israeli passengers who subdued the ax-wielding co-pilot after he attacked the pilot — demanding he be freed, two men who helped secure the terror suspect told The Post in exclusive interviews.

“They were asking us to untie the terrorist — we had no idea why,” said banking executive Tzvika Manes, one of the three civilians who took down the would-be hijacker.

“They were saying to free the terrorist — we got instantly suspicious of them,” said real estate professional Daniel Schlichter, who was sitting in the second row, close to the cockpit.

Manes, 40, was traveling with his wife and three daughters aged 11, 7, and 6, after a family vacation in Japan, when the co-pilot, identified by The Wall Street Journal as an Omani national Hamam al-Hammami, began hacking at the Indian pilot, Capt. Smit Machchhar, with a crash ax.

The seriously injured Machchhar managed to open the cockpit door. Manes, along with plumber Yaniv Hayoun and Asaf Rajuan, rushed to confront the attacker and overpowered him.

Hayoun, a plumber, then managed to stabilize the nosediving plane using techniques he learned from the TV show “Air Disasters.”

But after the three Israelis subdued the pilot and restrained him face-down with his hands tied behind his back — first with zip ties, then using headphone wires that Schlicter gathered from passengers.

As he was subdued, Hayoun heard the terrorist cry, “Kill me, kill me” — apparently because he failed in his Jihadist mission, Manes said.

Yet some crew members began demanding that he be freed.

An argument ensued and the Israeli trio shot back that under no circumstances would the suspected terrorist be released.

“They said, ‘You are not God, you are not going to kill him,’” Manes recalled. “We didn’t want to kill him, we just wanted him not to kill us.”

Continues …

PA News Agency – Oct 3, 2026

A sixth man who was arrested in connection with a suspected terror plot at RAF Fairford has been released on bail, Counter Terrorism Policing (CTP) said.

The 25-year-old man, a dual UK-Iranian national, was arrested on suspicion of preparation of terrorist acts under Section 5 of the Terrorism Act 2006.

He was arrested on Thursday in the Borough of Westminster, London, where searches of two properties have now concluded.

The investigation into the incident is ongoing, CTP added.

It comes after five British nationals, all in their mid-20s, were arrested on suspicion of explosives offences and terrorism and then bailed.

Three suspicious vans were spotted near the military site in Gloucestershire last weekend.

Senior CTP national co-ordinator Vicki Evans previously said the investigation is “hugely complex”, adding specialist teams are “interrogating multiple lines of inquiry”.

She added: “As we’ve made clear, we’re looking at all possible angles – including possible foreign state involvement.”

Prime Minister Andy Burnham has said there were “strong indications” Iran played a part in the incident near the Gloucestershire military base.

RAF Fairford has been used in recent months by US bombers after former prime minister Sir Keir Starmer granted the US permission to use British bases for “defensive” strikes against Tehran during the Middle East war.

Counter-terror police have said a quantity of petrol but no explosive devices were found in the vans that sparked the security alert near the airbase.

On Thursday, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed Israel handed Britain intelligence about the suspected terror plot.

Mr Netanyahu said his country warned UK authorities about the “Iranian-sponsored attack” shortly before Britain’s announcement of a ban on trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Earlier in the week, US president Donald Trump said he was “disappointed” after the five men were released on bail.

He told reporters: “We were involved in (the investigation), but as you know, your fellow countrymen let them go.

“Well, they didn’t let them go. They put them out on bail. I assume they haven’t watched closely… they should not have done that.”

Source

Martin Jay – Strategic Review Oct 3, 2026

The false flag attacks are coming in fast and furious in an attempt to keep both Donald Trump and Bibi Netanyahu in office beyond their normal expiry date. What they really reveal, though, is the extent of how Western media is now a dirty tool of intelligence agencies.

With both leaders of the U.S. and Israel facing an unprecedented challenge to their office, is it not reasonable to assume that both will use their power to indulge in skulduggery and dirty tricks to survive? For Trump, he knows he is facing impeachment if he loses both houses, and I have speculated in earlier articles that he will be looking at unprecedented ways of either calling off the midterm elections or refusing to acknowledge their results – using a pretext of war with Iran. For something, in legal terms, like that to be pulled off, the circumstances would have to be on a scale of Pearl Harbour or 9/11. America would have not only to be at war, but under attack on its own soil for Trump to attempt such a stunt, which many argue isn’t possible in the constitution. But Trump is always breaking rules and pushing the boundaries of what he can do in office, and so it would not be uncharacteristic for him and his legal team to be burning the midnight oil plotting something which is so huge and so significant.

The same story plays out for Benjamin Netanyahu, who is facing seven counts of corruption if his case ever gets heard in Israel. A surefire way of making sure it doesn’t is to keep Israel in a permanent state of war with Iran and to raise the stakes to the point where it appears that this tiny country is under attack.

And so, at the risk of being called a conspiracy theorist, many will assume a false flag attack – or even a series of them – might be coming our way soon, both in Israel and in the West – for the justification of war. Trump’s claims that the U.S. will resume bombing after the midterm elections may well have been a masterly move, when all along he is planning an attack sooner against Iran. To go ahead earlier with a large-scale attack is of course very risky, as, if gas prices go even higher or we see U.S. casualties, this could be a final suicide pill that Trump takes even before Americans go to the polls. But this is a U.S. president who believes he is significantly more intelligent than he really is, and who has fired all the advisers around him who can give him sound advice which would probably not chime with his childish, moronic ideas about what America’s military capability is in the Middle East. Yet it would seem that the plan is to not allow Iran the possibility of a pre-emptive strike.

How else could any cynical analyst interpret two key “attacks” on both Israel and the West recently brought to us dutifully by Western mainstream media? The so-called terror attack on the Dubai flight heading towards Israel is very suspicious, not least of all because Iran issued a warning just a few hours before it happened that a false flag attack was going to take place on a plane, framing Iran. A scuffle in the cockpit which involved a stabbing certainly happened, but the plane spiralling out of control for it to be rescued at the last moment by Israeli pilots who just so happened to be aboard and were able to apprehend the pilot sounds like a really bad Hollywood movie script with B-class actors. The timing is questionable, as is how fast Netanyahu and media were ready to present it to the world as a terror attack.

Just a few days earlier we saw a similar fanciful story in the UK at an RAF airbase where men were arrested under terrorism laws, with Andy Burnham reacting quickly to blame Iran. But where is the evidence? Was Burnham asked to go ahead with a false flag attack by Trump when they met earlier in the month at the UN assembly in New York? The men, although arrested and charged under terrorism laws, were remarkably allowed to walk free on bail. And nothing in their vans, which were parked in woods, has been found which would suggest they were planning any attacks. Were these men set up? Were they paid to do a certain job late at night knowing they were certain to be intercepted? If Iran were behind such fun and games, surely there would not be this level of amateur dramatics.

A more sober take on both the Israeli hostage flight and the UK airbase being a target of terrorism is that they were both staged by the desperate leaders of both the U.S. and Israel in a bid to prepare the Western public for an imminent war which, clearly, the UK will play a considerable role in – despite the window dressing of its foreign minister’s statements about bringing Israel into line on its Gaza genocide (which was also probably a PR ruse).

In many ways this was inevitable, made even more so by the temptation of using Western press as willing partners in crime in a massive, gross misrepresentation of facts to serve a bigger agenda of the elites who own legacy media. A war with Iran is coming on a scale which is certainly going to be greater than the previous “incursions”. The only real question is who blinks first and kicks it off. But the old rules always apply for those who want to seek the truth. In Western media, never believe those who are presented as the culprits, as these usual suspects are nearly always not those who have the finger on the trigger. And in any case, ask yourself: why would Iran need to plan such attacks? What would it gain? The only winners are those who have presented themselves as victims to justify what they are about to do. The lies in the past which we have been presented by both the U.S./UK and of course Israel (which is really the grand master of packing fake news, in particular video) are too great, too exhaustive to ignore. And as long as Western media is happy to play its role, what we are witnessing is what their real role is required to be – given that nearly all of them are loss-making ventures.

Source 

We are living in an extremely dangerous moment in history. We are also living in an extremely irrational time, at least when it comes to evaluating the mentality, conduct, and words of Western politicians and media in the face of disaster.

On the one hand, Western leaders, pundits, and military commanders clamor with predictions of war with Russia as being imminent. Yet on the other hand, there is an astounding dereliction to avert it. Diplomacy and understanding are boorishly shunned. Indeed, there is an absolutely irrational choice of escalation towards war, especially among European politicians.

Underlying this, of course, is an ideological supremacist belief, a contempt for Russia and other officially designated enemies (China, Iran, and so on), whereby the Western political class sees itself as superior, not as equals. That mentality makes for war and precludes diplomatic engagement and dialogue.

In any objective reading of the situation, there is little doubt that the danger of all-out world war is upon us. Incredibly, for the third time in just over a century, the planet is facing the specter of a massive international conflict. But on this occasion, the outcome would be nuclear conflagration with the extinction of life as we know it. This repeated destruction is a damning indictment of the Western system, its capitalist and imperialist engines for violence, domination and, inevitably, conflict. Surely, such a system should be abolished.

The Doomsday Clock, overseen by the independent Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, is at its closest point to midnight in all of 80 years of existence. The clock was inaugurated following the U.S. atomic horror attacks on Japan in 1945. It was meant to serve as a warning of the increasing risk of nuclear war. It is truly a frightening spectacle that today’s danger of global disaster surpasses the many perils that were encountered during the Cold War decades. Today’s tensions surpass even those of the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis when the United States and the Soviet Union edged towards a nuclear war.

Many Western scholars, legal experts, analysts, and seasoned diplomats have increasingly added their voices warning of the ultimate disaster. We pay respect to the sane voices of people like Alfred de Zayas, Jeffrey Sachs, Larry Johnson, and Scott Ritter, voices in the West that, unlike their political class, are passionately warning of the path to perdition the world is on and needs to urgently get off.

The warning words are flashing like a red light, yet Western leaders keep making decisions and issuing belligerent statements that are driving the world to the precipice.

This week, European politicians have again openly advocated attacking the Russian Federation by blockading Kaliningrad, the Russian exclave between Poland and Lithuania. Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski and NATO chief Mark Rutte (former Dutch premier) have echoed calls from other European politicians to effectively attack Kaliningrad, that is, to attack the Russian Federation. Russia’s nuclear doctrine explicitly states that such an assault compels it to use nuclear weapons in response.

So, why do NATO leaders keep pushing provocation? Such moves are merely an extension of the NATO proxy war in Ukraine. Their war is a failure. But the Western pro-war politicians cannot admit they are wrong. They are willing to incite a wider war rather than admit defeat and face the political repercussions from their own citizens.

Russia this week issued a grave warning, saying that any attack on Kaliningrad would result in Russian retaliation with nuclear weapons.

Instead of coming to their senses and sobering up, European politicians haughtily dismiss Russia’s warnings as a “bluff” or accuse Moscow of nuclear saber-rattling.

In a plenary address to the Valdai forum in Moscow on Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin underlined the infernal precariousness.

“If it comes to a direct attack on the Russian Federation – in this case, Kaliningrad, although it could potentially involve other territories as well – the question of Russia using all the weapons at its disposal would inevitably and immediately arise. That is inevitable,” said Putin.

In an ominous assessment of the reckless direction, he noted:

“We must realise that the moment when nothing can be changed any longer may come very quickly and unexpectedly for everyone. The logic of escalating, increasingly harsh retaliatory measures leads to a fatal point of no return.”

The Russian leader is saying that the West’s relentless escalation in words and deeds is leading to an abyss. Incredibly, the Western politicians refuse to restrain themselves. “At the heart of this escalation lie arrogance and overconfidence… The spiral is tightening, and the devastating consequences are growing.”

This appalling dynamic is redolent of the prelude to the First and Second World Wars, when Western political establishments were insouciant about the impending doom.

But a Third World War is truly a point of no return.

“All the more so today, when the arsenals of the world’s leading powers contain weapons capable of destroying all life or, at the very least, reducing the Earth to a catastrophic state,” Putin said.

What is deplorable is the total propagandizing of public discussion in the West. Anyone who dares to speak about the objective historical causes that have given rise to the current tensions is censored or pilloried as a Russian stooge.

There are eminent voices of sanity in the West, as noted above. But they are systematically excluded from public discourse by the mainstream media and academia. The public has to rely on alternative media sources for information. That has, thankfully, energized critical views among citizens in ever greater numbers, who are questioning the whole warmongering policy of inordinate military spending and weapons for Ukraine to fight a futile war against Russia. Notably, this week German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and NATO’s Mark Rutte were heckled and booed when they appeared in public in Muenster, Germany.

Increasing numbers of people understand that we have been pushed to an existential crisis by Western governments (regimes) who took undemocratic, secret decisions to wage war against Russia years ago.

As former British diplomat Ian Proud pointed out in an excellent podcast this week while attending the Sochi forum, the rulers in London made a conscious decision to go to war with Russia as far back as 2014, when the West sponsored the fascist coup in Kiev.

Other Western figures, like former U.S. state planner Victoria Nuland and former NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg, have also admitted in their own words that NATO deliberately weaponized Ukraine after 2014 for the purpose of confronting Russia. This was before the hostilities erupted in Ukraine in February 2o22.

Thus, the world has been pushed to a nuclear “extinction event” all because of Western policy to pursue confrontation with Russia, using Ukraine as a proxy.

War is highly probable, but it is not inevitable. Western politicians and media, through their arrogance and Russophobia, are certainly doing their worst to make it inevitable. But these criminal elements may not prevail.

There are international structures and laws; there is still diplomacy, albeit abused and trashed; perhaps more importantly, there is mass public opinion against the odious warmongers; and there is a burgeoning social and political uprising against the evidently bankrupt Western political system.

The political elite in the West who are pimping for war may seem dominant, owing to apparently dominant media narratives. But their power is vastly overrated against the huge public opposition to their criminal agenda.

History may rhyme, as with lead-ups to previous infamous wars. This time, however, a crucial difference is that there may be sufficient public awareness so as not to fall for the warmonger ruse of bailing out the rotten system.

We are on the eve of destruction, but there is every sound hope that rather than war, the destruction tomorrow could be that of the Western imperialist system, thereby giving way to a truly better, more just and peaceful world.

Source 

Or view here: https://www.realjewnews.com/?p=2568

More Vids!

+BN Vids Archive HERE!

Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation?

Br Nathanael Fnd is Tax Exempt/EIN 27-2983459

DONATE

Or send your contribution to:

The Brother Nathanael Foundation, POB 547, Priest River, ID 83856

Source 

Russia has issued a new call for diplomats and foreigners to leave Kyiv, warning the Ukrainian capital of “massive” strikes, in a statement by its foreign ministry.

Moscow has been pummelling Ukraine with drone and missile barrages throughout its offensive and in the past weeks has stepped up the strikes against Kyiv, targeting key infrastructure.

In a statement, the Russian foreign ministry said it “had previously urged foreign nationals and diplomats in Kyiv to leave the city and refrain from visiting Ukraine.”

“We note with concern that not everyone has heeded these warnings, and that individuals are knowingly exposing themselves to mortal danger,” the ministry said.

“The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will continue to deliver massive retaliatory strikes,” it warned.

It also stated that “responsibility for any potential negative consequences rests entirely with those who ignore this warning.”

A Russian strike targeted a major bridge in Kyiv, its mayor said this morning, in another attack on Ukrainian infrastructure that has brought traffic chaos to the capital.

The attack on the Northern Bridge, which followed a drone alert, came a day after the Southern Bridge was hit in a wave of strikes that city officials say is “tearing Kyiv apart”.

“Northern Bridge has been hit,” Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said on Telegram. “Emergency services are heading to the scene.”

In another update, mR Klitschko said the attack had damaged the road surface and trolleybus wires on the bridge.

“Traffic across the bridge from the left bank to the right bank is currently blocked,” he said.

The latest strike follows multiple attacks on crossings over the Dnipro river that link the eastern and western parts of the capital.

Yesterday, authorities shut the Southern Bridge – one of Kyiv’s main bridges – and restricted movement on another after a wave of strikes by fast-moving, jet-powered drones, causing severe traffic congestion across the capital.

Long lines of stationary cars and buses clogged major roads as commuters sought alternate routes, with some forced to continue their journeys on foot.

The Southern Bridge is one of eight crossings connecting the two sides of Kyiv.

The cable-stayed structure had already been hit several times since Thursday, according to city officials.
Mr Klitschko warned yesterday that the capital should now be on a war footing.

President Volodymyr Zelensky accused his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, of ripping up the rulebook of armed conflict by sanctioning massive attacks on civilian areas, an accusation the Kremlin has rejected.

In Odesa, Russia attacked a Liberian-flagged cargo ⁠ship in one of Ukraine’s Black Sea ports, killing one person and injuring three, the Ukrainian ‌sea ⁠ports administration said on Saturday.

It said in a statement on the Telegram app that 13 ‌other crew members were evacuated to safety.

Separately, one ⁠person was killed and two more were injured ⁠in a Ukrainian attack on Russia’s Belgorod region, which ‌borders ⁠Ukraine, ‌the TASS state news ⁠agency reported.

Source 

Images of burning schools, buses, and vicious assaults, along with a report of attempted murder, have once again hit France this morning, Oct. 1, as high school blockades mark their second week across France. What began as protests demanding better conditions for students and teachers has devolved into violence at dozens of locations, concentrated at schools with large immigrant populations

This morning, Oct. 1, further clashes, burning buses, and arson attacks have been reported. French news outlet BFMTV is even speaking of murder attempts being carried out by certain students in one incident where the leadership team of one school in Marseille was doused in gasoline. In response, French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu is convening an interministerial emergency meeting at 1 p.m. to contain the crisis.

In Marseille, the regional government said an “unacceptable line” had been crossed at Victor Hugo High School, where “the principal, the deputy principal, the general secretary and the team leader were assaulted and doused with gasoline,” according to the Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur region, cited by BFMTV.

BFMTV also reported that a naval firefighters’ vehicle was looted and set on fire in the city. Viral videos also show a bus on fire with numerous Black and Arab youths pelting the bus with stones and dancing on its roof. The Marseille transport authority, RTM, said several of its buses “were targeted near high schools in the north and east of Marseille,” that “drivers had to leave their vehicles in a hurry, and one of them was assaulted.”

The transit authority condemned “these irresponsible acts.” ICI reported that two buses caught fire in northern Marseille and that two buses were damaged near Floride High School in the 14th arrondissement. A dumpster was also set alight outside Victor Hugo High School. Authorities said 40 high schools in the Bouches-du-Rhône department were affected Thursday, and 18 of them were fully blocked.

The regional authority said the violence was no longer a protest.

“Mortar fire at staff, vehicle fires, gates torn down, stoning and intolerable intrusions: this is not contestation, it is delinquency,” it said, according to ICI. “Those who burn our high schools are attacking the Republic.”

In Nantes, the hall of Nelson-Mandela High School was destroyed by what deputy principal Gaëlle Cordier called a “deliberate” fire that spread to the façade before firefighters brought it under control, RTL and Ouest-France reported. The school was expected to stay closed for days, and RTL said the administration expected a closure of several weeks.

The Nelson Mandela High School of Nantes actually just had a major “eco-friendly inclusive” renovation. The building cost €77 million in taxpayer money. However, the all-wooden design, with the interior reportedly designed for “positive energy,” has now gone up in flames. It could cost tens of millions to rebuild.

Despite the threat to life and property, the far-left pro-migration party France Unbowed (LFI) has tried to bolster the student movement, which is now spiraling out of control.

A fire at the private Talensac High School in the city center destroyed the entrance doors.

“The same wreckers everywhere. The same violence everywhere. The same political exploitation everywhere,” Christelle Morançais, president of the Pays de la Loire region, wrote. “No demand to satisfy, just the will to sow chaos and destroy everything. This is not the youth of France.”

Staff have also been repeatedly attacked in other schools by migrant students hunting in packs.

Elsewhere Thursday, the prefecture said the façade of Lumière High School in Lyon’s 8th arrondissement was set on fire, Actu Lyon reported. In Annecy, fires were set outside the Berthollet, Baudelaire and Sommeiller high schools. Firefighters said they were working to keep the flames from reaching the buildings.

The unrest built through the week. On Wednesday, Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez said 356 high schools were disrupted, 625 people were arrested and 83 police officers and gendarmes were injured, in a tally he described as not yet final, Europe 1 reported. Education Minister Édouard Geffray said 119 students and staff had been injured since the blockades began, including 34 staff members. “That is unprecedented in the national education system,” he said.

In addition, the following cases have been reported:

In Wattrelos, in the Nord, a car was driven against the gates of the Émile-Zola middle-and-high school and set on fire Wednesday. The school was closed, and prosecutors opened an inquiry for arson, Le Figaro reported.

In Montpellier on Tuesday, a fire destroyed the caretaker’s lodge at a side entrance of Jean-Mermoz High School and the school was evacuated.

In Bordeaux on Wednesday, a bin fire outside Gustave-Eiffel High School spread to the façades of two houses across the street, and firework mortars were fired toward the school, ICI reported. Ten people were arrested in the Gironde for arson, damage and throwing projectiles.

At Paul-Éluard High School in Saint-Denis, outside Paris, a fire damaged the main gate. Île-de-France region president Valérie Pécresse said replacement, security and cleaning up would cost about €100,000, and put total damage at regional high schools near €1 million, including about 10 gates out of service.

Geffray also cited a teacher beaten in the Nord, a head teacher injured by a firework mortar in the Hauts-de-Seine, and another threatened with death in the Essonne.

As Remix News reported yesterday, Geffray said: “This violence is unspeakable.” However, despite his threats to launch legal proceedings against rioters, the violence has only grown far worse today, Oct. 1.

Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu has called any escalation “irresponsible.” Nuñez has described some of the violence as closer to urban rioting than to a labor protest.

Source 

France24.com – Oct 1, 2026

French students set fire to bins and erected blockades outside schools in several cities, protesting against overcrowded classrooms, teacher shortages and crumbling facilities.

Several school principals were injured, harassed or assaulted during blockades at high schools on Thursday, according to reports from regional education authorities, prefectures and union representatives.

Riot police have lined up against the students, and the force has launched internal probes after accusations of brutality against three pupils, said Interior Minister Laurent Nunez.

Police have already detained hundreds of protesters at the lycées, which students aged 15 to 18 attend for their final three years of secondary education in France.

In ​the Parisian suburb of Saint-Denis, crowds of young people massed in front of a line of police. One student ​held up a sign that read: “Can we explain ourselves without being teargassed?”

The interior ministry said police and gendarmes had made 1,949 arrests on Thursday, while 305 officers had been injured. Nunez condemned what he described as “unbridled violence”.

Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu convened a crisis meeting in the afternoon, asking his ministers to cancel their travel plans over the coming days due to the blockades led by high school students in order to let prefects handle the situation, his entourage reported.

The government said the demonstrations had become “urban violence” and cited the intelligence service to justify claims that it had been organised by the radical left.

Manuel Bompard, a leading figure in the left-wing France Unbowed party (LFI), quickly dismissed the claim, accusing the government of “sinking into conspiratorial thinking”.

“LFI has always advocated non-violent demonstrations,” LFI lawmaker Louis Boyard told BFM TV after a readout of the crisis meeting was shared with reporters.

“The government, by turning it into a political battle, has added fuel to the fire by insulting and repressing high school students,” he added.

“This sense of frustration will not be dealt with through batons; it will be dealt with by showing ‌consideration for these young people,” he said.

This latest wave of social unrest comes with tensions already running high over inflation, particularly soaring fuel prices – and just seven months away from France’s presidential election, where opinion polls suggest far-right leader Marine Le Pen is the frontrunner.

A security source said there had been 900 blockades or related incidents across the country on Thursday.

More than 160 schools were shut down, and university students joined the protests in Paris, Marseille and other cities.

And the authorities in the Paris region said around 50 schools had been “the scene of violence, clashes and damage”.

‘It’s unbearable’

Since last week, pupils have staged protests outside schools over a range of grievances. They range from timetables, class sizes and a shortage of teachers to overheated classrooms during this year’s heatwaves.

The protests have spread across the country from the Paris suburbs.

University students also joined in Thursday, blocking access to around 30 campuses, a student union said.

Among reports of school staff being targeted was one incident in the southern port city of Marseille when a school principal and his deputy were inadvertently splashed with petrol as protesters were trying to fill containers.

In the northwestern city of Nantes, firefighters had to intervene to extinguish a fire in the entrance of a high school “following a gathering marked by violence towards staff”, the regional education board said.

Authorities reported violence near high schools, mainly in Nantes, blaming “violent individuals” who “join the students to carry out acts of vandalism”.

In the northeastern city of Strasbourg, trams were ordered to halt to “restrict the movements of rioters and demonstrators”, the regional prefect said.

Raphael, a 17-year-old who did not give his surname for fear of reprisals, was among the protesters outside a school in Strasbourg, where some used barriers to obstruct the nearby tramway tracks.

“There are 35 of us per classroom. With 35°C in summer, it’s unbearable. There aren’t enough toilets, and there are water leaks in some rooms,” Raphael said.

“The building is falling apart, the cafeteria is too small. There’s zero budget, zero resources, not enough supervisors,” he said.

Nearby, students took photos of themselves in front of burning rubbish bins, holding up the sign with their school’s name ripped off the tram stop.

Most pupils did not take part in any vandalism, instead breaking into a sprint down an avenue when the police fired tear gas.

In the southern city of Toulouse, hundreds of young people flooded the tram tracks, some toppling trash cans and starting fires, hurling projectiles or smashing bus shelters, AFP journalists said.

In the northern city of Lille, AFP reporters saw young people wearing black hoodies destroy the glass of a bus stop. Firefighters intervened to put out the flames on upturned dustbins set on fire.

The government has accused the left-wing LFI of encouraging the protests.

But LFI’s candidate for the 2027 presidential election, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, said on Wednesday that his party “called for non-violent methods of struggle”.

In neighbouring Belgium, there were protests and damage at a handful of schools in the eastern city of Liège, police said.

Source 

My worst suspicions have now been confirmed. TIME and several other news organizations are reporting today that Trump consulted the AI chatbot Grok before making the decision to invade Venezuela and kidnap its president in January.

Given Trump’s outsized support for all things AI, including the construction of thousands of AI data-collection centers and his recent rebranding of artificial intelligence as “super intelligence,” we now know for a fact that he has a personal relationship with this technology and is at least partially dependent upon it for performing the duties of his office.

The AI watchdog organization OECD.ai reports as follows:

In December 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump consulted Grok, an AI chatbot developed by Elon Musk’s company, about Venezuelan public reaction to the potential capture of President Nicolás Maduro. The AI’s analysis influenced the decision-making process preceding a U.S. military operation that led to Maduro’s capture, causing significant political disruption in Venezuela.

The AI system (Grok) was explicitly used in the decision-making process preceding a military operation that resulted in the capture of a head of state and political upheaval. This operation caused direct harm and disruption, and the AI’s analysis was a contributing factor in the decision. Hence, the event meets the criteria for an AI Incident as the AI system’s use directly or indirectly led to harm and disruption.

Who knows if Grok might even have a system tailored specifically for Donald Trump and his personality type.

AI chatbots are well known to have a tendency to tell the person consulting them what they want to hear. AI experts have openly acknowledged this as a problem and even have a name for it. They call it “AI sycophancy.” Back in May, I posted an article on a Stanford University study verifying the dangers of AI sycophancy.

In other words, AI can be a narcissist’s best friend. No need to consult with human advisers who might disagree or offer advice that cuts through the narcissist’s strongly held biases. This is a recipe for disaster, and you can bet this story of Trump’s growing addiction to AI to perform his duties as president will fly under the radar with little press coverage. The coverage it does receive will not dive into all of the negative ramifications of having a president who relies on AI to make his decisions.

In a way, this is no different than the previous president, who reportedly relied on others to run his presidency and didn’t engage a mind of his own. When it came to foreign policy, Biden handed his brain over to Jake Sullivan. Donald Trump has turned his over to AI. I’m not sure which is worse, but both are examples of a president who is not really in charge of anything.

What’s to stop Grok, owned by arch technocrat Elon Musk, to create and train an AI designed to nudge Trump in the direction of technocracy. Musk is a champion of technocracy and is the maternal grandson of one of technocracy’s founding fathers, the Canadian Joshua Haldeman. Musk now has a potential stooge as president who is consulting his AI chatbot for a sort of divine guidance. Oh, think of the possibilities for creating a truly Manchurian Candidate!

Below is an excerpt from an article in the tech journal Techlicious regarding Trump’s use of AI:

It’s an unusual example of a president consulting a consumer AI chatbot about a consequential foreign policy question. And while there’s no evidence that Grok directly influenced the military operation, the account raises important questions about the growing role of artificial intelligence in government decision-making.

According to TIME, Trump met privately with Musk in the Oval Office in December 2025. During the meeting, he spent hours asking Grok questions about his presidency and legacy, according to an official who was present, including the one about how Venezuelans would respond to the capture of Maduro. When the U.S. military captured Maduro on January 3, and celebrations followed, Trump reportedly came away impressed by Grok’s apparent accuracy.

But an AI chatbot getting a prediction right doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a reliable source of information for decisions with potentially far-reaching consequences.

Generative AI systems are designed to produce responses based on patterns learned during training and information available to them. They can provide useful analysis and synthesize large amounts of information, but they can also generate inaccurate information, omit important context, and express unwarranted confidence in their conclusions. As OpenAI has acknowledged, even sophisticated language models are susceptible to hallucinations, producing plausible answers that aren’t supported by the facts.

I think it would be naive to believe that if Trump consulted Grok before launching his invasion of Venezuela and got the answer he was looking for, that he wouldn’t have also sought advice from Grok before attacking Iran. We will probably read about that story six months to a year from now.

As noted by Futurism, the Stanford study “adds to a growing consensus about the dangers of chatbot sycophancy as a design feature of the tech, as well as new research about the willingness of users to readily — and uncritically — trust AI outputs.”

“By default, AI advice does not tell people that they’re wrong nor give them ‘tough love,’” Myra Cheng, the study’s lead author said in a statement. “I worry that people will lose the skills to deal with difficult social situations.”

From a spiritual standpoint, isn’t that exactly how Satan works, zeroing in on our weaknesses and vulnerabilities, and then telling us what we want to believe, rather than what is true?

Upgrade to paid

Source 

Iran is preparing a broader and more forceful response if the United States launches major military strikes include again, possible attacks on facilities in countries in addition to US operations and on beyond the Middle East, Reuters reported, citing unnamed sources.

Tehran is actually pursuing diplomatic efforts, although Iranian officials believe the prospect of those initiatives successful are very low, according to the report.

Three senior Iranian officials and a person familiar with the discussion said Iran’s top military commanders were reviewing plans to expand the list of potential targets. The planning would be directly linked to the United States and consider sites in the United States and consider sites in countries supporting US military operations, as well as possible outside the Middle East.

Iranian military commanders and senior officials have intensified discussions over the nature and of a response time if the United States attacks again President since Masoud Peshkian returned from New York Week.

There is no final decision that has been taken, the source said. Military planning has intensified as no side appears willing to move towards a settlement.

Hamidreza Azizi, a senior Iran analyst at the International Crisis Group, said Tehran remains uncertain whether the president Donald Trump would launch another major military operation or take more limited action, such as on nuclear facilities.

“They don’t appear to respond to symbolically to symbolic actions,” Azizi said. “Rather, they seem to want to want to regret in the restoration of deterrence.”

Tehran is also considering the political risks for a prolonged conflict. Polls show that the war is unpopular among Americans, while high energy prices have become an additional concern ahead of the midterm elections.

Two Iranian officials said allied groups in Lebanon, Yemen and Iraq have been instructed to prepare to assist Iran if the United States launches another major attack.

The instructions were to prepare for a coordinated response that could extend “From the Strait of Hormuz to the region and US interests beyond the Middle East”, the officials said. Iran’s Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to Reuters request for comment.

Tehran has kept the path for negotiations and open preparing for a war. A major concern for Iranian leaders if the country’s economy can withstand a prolonged conflict under US sanctions.

U.S. sanctions have stalled Iran’s oil exports, a major source of government revenue. Years of sanctions and a deepening economic crisis already placed pressure on ordinary Iranians.

During the last week’s United Nations General Assembly session in New York, Tehran sent a proposal to Washington through Qatari mediators. Iran has said that acceptance of the proposal could reopen the Strait of Hormuz and the halt hostilities across the region within seven days.

Iranian authorities said the proposal was called for an end to the war, the lifting of the US blockade Iranian ports, the release of at least $12 billion in frozen Iranian funds, and the removal or the lifting of oil against sanctions in Iran.

Trump said on Saturday that he had rejected the Iran’s proposal. Iranian state media later reported that Tehran received a US response through Qatar on Tuesday and was reviewing it.

Iranian sources say Washington wants Iran’s nuclear program to be included in negotiations. Tehran’s position is that nuclear talks can only begin after itsspecific “seven conditions” are met.

“Even if Iran does not directly reject the US response and indirect talks continue, the possibility of an agreement between the two sides is very low,” said an Iranian official.

Alex Vatanka, director of the Iranian program at the Middle East Institute in Washington, said prospects for a diplomatic resolution limited.

“Iran cannot afford to sustain such US sanctions for long,” Vatanka said. “This could have brought about a major change, effectively taking oxygen out of the government’s lungs. At this stage further, escalation is likely.”

The conflict has seen temporary pauses followed by renewed attacks since hostilities began. Thousands of civilians have been killed, Iran’s military capabilities have been damaged, and the country’s already weak economy has suffered more.

For the United States, the war has failed to achieve Trump’s changing objectives while reducing the Pentagon’s missile stockpiles, the report said. Iran and its allies have sought to raise the cost of war for Washington spreading the conflict across the region.

Iran and allied groups have disrupted oil transport through the Streit of Hormuz, increasing risks in global markets. Iran has launched drone and missile attacks against US allies in the Gulf, while the Iran-backed Houtthis in Yemen has targeted facilities in Saudi Arabia.

The Houthis’s movement towards the Bab El-Mandeb Strait has created a second pressure point on global energy shipping routes, the Iranian giving-backed group an opportunity to exert influence the southern to the Red Sea.

A person close to the decision-making process said the combined impact of military pressure and economic sanctions was increasingly being difficult for Iran’s religious leadership to sustain.

The pressure has also been intensified among concerns in Iran over domestic stability. A former senior Iranian reformist official has said fear a repeat of nationwide protests in January, which is the spread amid worsening economic conditions.

Iranian authorities finally suppressed the protesting, which several demonstrators were killed, the official said.

“When taking the place of the country inside the country while the state is under US pressure and bombardment, it can pose an extremely serious challenge to the legiti legimacy of the ruling system,” the official said.

Iranian authorities have tightened control as the anniversary of the January protests. Authorities are also seeking to keep the public mobilised and loyal encouraging government supporters to return to nighttime rallies.

Human rights organizations said the Iranian government intensified its campaign against dissent during the war.

Source 

Source 

God Poet Transmitting…….

Whenever they are hammering every portal of Crass Media, all of which is Ash Can Nazi-owned, you have to assume that it is a staged event, but there’s plenty more detail (and questions) here.

Perhaps you now see the means by which East Indians are being inserted into the West with far greater permissions and ease than any other demographic. Perhaps you see the intention as well. It is because the israelis intend to use them as agencies for all kinds of things in the future, and… China just has not been that forthcoming. There’s a little too much Sassooniphobia in the air.

Why do we battle with The World? It isn’t real… the appearances we contend against are not real. We only contend with them because our astrological influencers hammer on us to do so… according to the programming of our stars… which we should be riding as a conveyance, and not as something we are leashed to and which is being DRIVEN forward by a hard taskmaster.

Why tilt at imaginary creatures like Quixote? What you are seeing is not what you are seeing. It is all subjective impressions of what you were told you are seeing. Some habits are meant to be broken.

All of what you think you are and all of what you think you want is created by Materialism to serve the marketplace, by generating attractions between images seen in a mirror of projected self. The advertising arm sells you the product and then sells you the accouterments that make up the fantasy built in your head.

The girl with the luscious figure slouched on the car hood with a drink in her hand is not actually waiting there for you because you are such a catch. We are trained to dislike ourselves (there’s more money in it) so that we can be encouraged to fall in love with a different image of ourselves that is seen in someone else, and shaped by the cosmetic industry, and all the other cartoon illustrators.

The whole point of The World is to manipulate us for profit, and those whose interests lie in that direction do just that. They create the varieties of sexual attraction because diversity creates a larger and wider market. Sexual energy is THE energy. For those who can moderate and control its direction in you, there lies the promise of running The World. That also is a fairy tale. Someone is already running The World through a suite of laws created for that purpose.

In the beginning we see God in one another. The World changes that. Prior to puberty, we are in a mindset of unity. Puberty opens the door to a mortal dynamic in which we chase a lost unity for the rest of our temporary visit here. Some may find it; most will not, and no one will find it outside themselves because… it… doesn’t… work… that… way.

You have to find out how… it… works… because it already works a certain way, and that is the way that is best for you. That is NOT the way that The World works it for you. You are just a commodity as far as The World is concerned. You are packaged goods with an imaginary shelf life.

When Materialism gets the upper hand, a certain demographic gains significant power over the other demographics by the manipulation of appearances for the purpose of commerce and profit. Never fear, it’s all designed this way for the drama it provides.

God The Creator… God, your author, likes a good show. He wants to be amused, and you would do exceptionally well if you should discover what it is that he likes to see, and perform it for his/her/its pleasure.

The ancient symbols of the prophets turning a serpent into a staff are all about the control of this sexual force, which is one thing when it is crawling around in the grass, and something else when it is raised up to a state of vision. The World Teacher who is… in some ways already here… will be teaching humanity about this very thing… again… when he makes his appearance.

At present, certain collective interests are presenting various distorted impressions of life, in order to make a profit through your feeding these impressions with your energy. These are systems of control in which you play the role of a milk cow.

If you could see the invisible world, a great deal that is now a mystery to you would no longer be mysterious. Those DRIVEN to sell you shiny shit are possessed by forms of directed energy that serve infernal interests. It is their job to snag your attention and pull… you… down… through the efforts of those so possessed to do so.

On the other hand, there is another source of directed energy whose intention is your liberation and acquisition of God-like powers that operate THROUGH you when you can get out of the way of them, and not try to ride them off into a personal direction because… it is at that time… that they turn into a bucking bronco… because you are operating at cross purposes with The Will of Heaven.

Why do you think that Jesus said, I do nothing of myself, but it is my Father who does the work in me? Almost everyone is running around trying to play God by controlling their life (and the lives of others) according to their own schematic of how they think it should be. That is how and why The World is the way it is.

God likes the entertainment, and believe me… everything is for God’s entertainment. You need to simply accept that and adapt to it, because fighting it… heh heh… is not an option. You can’t win that way. That is what stupid and vain people do because they don’t know any better.

Someone is already in charge of everything, and it gets screwed up… like you presently see it… when large numbers of people follow bad advice and run around doing whatever they please. That’s how it gets ugly out here, NOT BECAUSE OF GOD’S interference or indifference, BUT… because everyone has decided to go their own way… or persist in their folly, instead of harmonizing with The Divine Intent.

There is a big difference in the outcome of life as an Amish farmer and life as a banker. Every lifestyle choice comes with its benefits and its deficits. In some cases… in most cases… one of these outweighs the other, and… in these times… most of the time… the deficits outweigh the benefits.

We… humanity… went off course. We were misguided, this is true, but… we also didn’t have to conform to the herding tactics of those driving us to market. Yes… they can hurt you on occasion when you go off the reservation, but they cannot keep you on the reservation; I know this personally, since I have proven it out, or had it proven out in me, by The Great Proveroutter.

Yes, this means you don’t get to compete in the marketplace because you are not cooperating with the people who are trying to enslave and kill you, HOWEVER… when your time comes to shine, there is NOTHING they can do about it, and that time will come, so… why not first get good at what it is you are so passionate about doing… before you run out on stage without the goods. That’s embarrassing, although far too many of us… these days… are immune to an awareness of it.

The whole secret of life is getting into harmony with Divine Agency. There is a flow… a sort of current… that moves through life, and you can come into contact with it by giving way before it. Many forms of discipline are based on this method of ceasing to resist the natural passage of Divine Force moving through you, and the natural residence of Divine Force within you.

The World goes one way, and God goes the other. Try to learn the differences between these two. It can be difficult when… yes, precious. It can be difficult with we wants it, and so long as you wants whatever The Hell it is, you will be going the wrong way. Cease off with wanting. It is a prison sentence. Wanting builds a cage that takes your liberty and clips the wings of your freedom.

You can either have a lot of shit, or you can be free of it. People gravitate in one direction or the other… all the time… and the one choice always leads to increased suffering because your NATURAL state is Freedom! You’re just not right unless you are free. However, the truth is that you can’t be free in every sense, but you can choose the right master.

That master is only there to show you the way. That master is not there to bully and intimidate you; that is The Other Guy who does that. Serve The One, and you won’t have to worry about The Other. Serve The One, and you won’t have to worry about The Other. Yeah?

People on short chains who bark at you like dogs have chosen The Other Guy to be indentured to, and they are not happy when they see the servants of The One moving freely through time and space. You have to take this all in stride. People who do not know how to enjoy themselves always get angry at the people who do know how to enjoy themselves.

This is one of the costs that come with showing others a better way to go. You have to take a certain ration of abuse for a while. Then you don’t even notice it anymore, and…

…One Last Thing…….

Today’s Original Song is=

♫I Love You♫

Discourse #9 from The First Church of The Presence of God is at this location.

The entire audiobook of The Dark Splendor is at this location here.

SOME PATHETIC FEW LINKS IS WHAT I GOT=

The rash of events similar to this that are happening across the country are being engineered by The Deep State using israeli tech=

https://nypost.com/2026/09/29/us-news/psycho-south-carolina-mom-stabs-her-two-kids-over-50-times-in-unhinged-attack-that-leaves-one-facing-amputation/?utm_campaign=nypost&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social

I think the panic is the point, and this article is way too long for me to read it all=

https://insighttoincite.substack.com/p/report-chatbots-secretly-creating

Old news for me, but maybe not for you=

https://www.dailymail.com/sciencetech/article-15654471/cia-weather-control-files-exposed.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailus

Source 

It’s been a busy week for things not happening.

On Sunday, we were treated to a “terrorist bomb plot” that didn’t actually happen. In the US, the media is in full witch-hunt mode over an alleged gang-rape that, increasingly, looks like it didn’t happen.

And just yesterday, there was an “attempted hijacking”…that probably didn’t happen.

That’s the golden rule for big media stories:

1. It probably didn’t happen.
2. If it did happen, it didn’t happen the way they say it happened.

The story of the attempted hijacking is quite fascinating, not least because it took so long for anyone to officially declare what actually happened.

First it was an accident, then a fist fight between the pilots (whose nationality kept changing), and then it was an attempted hijacking by the co-pilot, bravely prevented when the passengers stormed the cockpit.

Now, I was under the impression you couldn’t “storm” a cockpit on most jet airliners these days, and hadn’t been able to basically since 9/11, but apparently I was wrong…you can just kick those doors in when you need to.

Or maybe the hero pilot opened the door after being stabbed with a knife and/or hit with an axe. Nobody is quite sure yet.

One of the “heroes”, an Israeli plumber who supposedly flew the plane to prevent it crashing, sat down with Bibi for a chat yesterday, still in his blood-stained clothes, as you do:

When all is said in done the whole story is either a lie, a false flag, or a mixture of both. It’s not especially interesting to me.

What’s interesting to me is this headline, from the Independent:

Only Netanyahu gains from the FlyDubai hijacking attempt

Huh. They’re blaming – or at least sort-of, potentially blaming – Benjamin Netanyahu.

This is interesting for a couple of reasons.

Firstly, because it shows the media does actually understand the basic idea of cui bono – who benefits? – and all the rest of the time they simply pretend not to.

But secondly, and most importantly, because the press NEVER blames Israel – or Israeli politicians – for false flags, not even ones they clearly and obviously did. Now, of course this Independent article doesn’t go so far as to actually call it a false flag and directly blame Netanyahu, but even the vaguest of implications is  possibly worth noting.

With the Israeli election looming – and his political opponents already condemning his “exploiting” of the hijacking story – this is yet another sign that Bibi might not be long for this political world.

(Oh, but now,  in the hour since I started writing this, they have changed that headline. It now reads “How the FlyDubai hijacking could help Netanyahu stay in power”. Somewhat softening  the original implication, which may also be significant.)

Last month, we covered how Israel was apparently becoming increasingly “isolated” on the world stage, and that Bibi maybe on the way out. Things have not improved for him since then.

In other negative Netanyahu news, Haaretz is reporting that he tried to cover up the fact he received warnings from the UAE prior to October 7th, and “pressured” UAE leaders to lie for him in a “secret visit”.

He was “pressed” on violence in the occupied West Bank by CNN reporters during an interview a couple of days ago.

In a different interview, this time with Fox, he claimed that Israel warned the British government about “Iran-backed” terror plots prior to the RAF Fairford “incident”. But given the farcical nature of that rapidly unravelling narrative, it would seem unwise to associate oneself with it.

A short video of Netanyahu claiming Israel can hack every smart phone to plant information that “makes you look like a monster” is suddenly all over social media. This is a clip from an interview that’s six months old…so why is it now going viral?

All in all, it’s not looking great for Bibi right now.

Whether or not he himself  is a willing participant in this I couldn’t say. Is he taking a dive? Or does he think he can rely on media glazing and fake terror attacks to save his career, as they have done so many times before?

Who knows, maybe it still can.

Support Off-Guardian

Source 

Support Me: Buy Me a Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/dialogueworks

See Full Interview: https://youtube.com/live/VO2YMP8jZf8?…

Source 

A well-informed source familiar with the matter has revealed new details about the incident related to an Emirati aircraft, saying Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plan to win the upcoming election is to drag US President Donald Trump into a new quagmire against Iran. 

Speaking to Press TV, the regional source said the “absurd scenario” involving the hijacking of an Emirati aircraft bound for the occupied territories from the UAE, followed by its landing in Saudi Arabia, was carried out on Wednesday, three days after Netanyahu travelled to the United Arab Emirates accompanied by several senior military and intelligence officials.

The project, the informed source said, was discussed and finalized during the visit.

According to the source, during that visit, in addition to the UAE being tasked with playing a role in the Israeli regime’s regional projects, multilateral talks were held with officials from several other Arab countries to devise a false-flag operation and attribute it to Iran.

The source said the objective of the operation is to force Trump into a new quagmire and trigger a new round of war against Iran.

Netanyahu, the source said, is deeply concerned that if Knesset elections are held under the current circumstances, his coalition will be unable to secure a majority and form a ruling coalition.

“In that case, after being removed from the premiership, he would have to spend the rest of his political life behind bars,” the source said.

The source further said the criminal prime minister of the Israeli regime hopes that, through the influence he wields over the White House and Trump personally, he can once again drag him into a full-scale war against the Islamic Republic.

The source said Netanyahu also seeks to continue using “America’s weapons, economy, and declining credibility” to repair his own “dire political situation.”

Meanwhile, in Iran, all enemy movements by the United States and the Zionist regime are being closely monitored, according to the source.

“Preparations are in place for the possibility of another act of folly under the pretext of Netanyahu’s absurd, pre-planned aircraft hijacking scheme,” the source noted.

Iran, he said, is prepared to deliver “harsh and devastating blows” to the Israeli regime and the United States in the event of any hostile action “that they will regret their false-flag operation and fabricated game.”

False-flag plot comes after Netanyahu’s UAE visit 

The plot comes days after Netanyahu travelled to the UAE and held closed-door talks with Emirati President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Mohsen Rezaei stated on Wednesday, the day of the aircraft incident.

In an Arabic-language message, he said that just as hosting US military bases had not brought the UAE security, hosting the “Butcher of Gaza” would not have favorable consequences either.

Rezaei urged Abu Dhabi to “learn from the last war, stop igniting wars,” and cease baseless claims over the Iranian islands of Abu Musa, Greater Tunb and Lesser Tunb.

In a statement issued ahead of the Emirati aircraft incident, Iran’s Foreign Ministry strongly condemned the “provocative presence” of the “child-killing and warmongering prime minister of the Zionist regime” in the region.

The ministry warned of the “extremely dangerous consequences” of the occupying regime’s presence at a time when West Asia is passing through one of its most fragile periods, citing the Israeli regime’s aggression against Iran and its escalation of occupation and genocide in Palestine and Lebanon.

“All countries in the region must remain vigilant regarding the consequences and repercussions of such a presence, which threatens regional peace and collective security,” the Foreign Ministry said.

Iranian officials have repeatedly cautioned Persian Gulf states that collusion with the Israeli regime, including the use of their territory for hostile projects against the Islamic Republic, carries serious consequences and will not be forgiven.

Source 

Let’s begin with the official story. In today’s AI-addled world, it’s easy to get concise summaries of official stories: Just ask AI. So Gemini: Did an Israeli plumber really pull an Emirati plane out of a suicide nosedive?

Gemini:

Yes, an off-duty Israeli plumber named Yaniv Hayun helped pull a Flydubai passenger flight out of a sharp dive after a mid-air cockpit attack. [1, 2]

What Happened

• The Incident: During a Flydubai flight traveling from Dubai to Tel Aviv, an in-flight altercation broke out in the cockpit. Officials stated that a pilot allegedly attacked the captain (identified as Smit Machchhar) with a knife, causing the aircraft to plunge rapidly thousands of feet. [1, 2, 3]
• The Intervention: The wounded captain managed to open the cockpit door and call for help. Yaniv Hayun, an Israeli passenger and plumber, rushed forward, put the attacker in a chokehold, and pulled him away from the controls. [1, 2, 3, 4]
• Pulling Up: Finding the cockpit momentarily vacant of functional control, Hayun grabbed the yoke and pulled back to help level the plane, later stating that watching aviation safety shows like Air Crash Investigation gave him a basic idea of what to do. [1, 2]
• The Resolution: Other passengers and off-duty pilots on board quickly stepped in to fully restrain the attacker and take over the aircraft. The flight safely diverted and made an emergency landing in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Wow. So it wasn’t just an Israeli plumber. It was an off-duty Israeli plumber! Good thing he was off-duty. Had he been hard at work unclogging the plane’s toilet, which he would have needed to do had it been as full of shit as this story, he would never have had the chance to heroically save the lives of 174 passengers by doing the unprecedented and near-impossible: Pulling the plane out of a suicide dive induced by a disgruntled pilot. (But at least he could have saved the toilet, and the passengers’ noses—as well as the noses of most of the world’s population, which are being tightly and unrelentingly squeezed to ward off the reek of this stinking story.)

Here is the plumber recounting his heroics to Bibi, who needs to work on his acting skills.

In the whole history of commercial aviation, there have been at least ten cases in which suicidal-homicidal pilots plunged their planes into steep high-speed nosedives. In all ten of those cases, the planes went splat and everyone died. Not once, before yesterday, had any commercial flight that had been put into a steep high-speed nosedive by a demented pilot EVER survived. Not once. The success rate for rescue efforts, even by other experienced pilots, is exactly 0%. Or was. After today, it is pushing 10%. The obvious lesson: In the name of aviation safety, every airline should offer a free first-class seat to a plumber who watches TV, just in case a knife-wielding suicidal pilot needs to be subdued after putting the plane into a steep nosedive, and the plane needs to be righted—a feat that pilots can’t accomplish, but TV-watching plumbers apparently can.

Even Donald Trump, who peddles the most atrociously ridiculous tall tales on a daily basis, had a hard time swallowing this one.

Here is Israeli TV footage of the passengers walking around the aisles during the steep high-speed nosedive:

Jackson Hinckle’s summary of the context has drawn two million views on X:

And the rest of X is melting down in helpless laughter.

There are still a great many questions swirling around this…er, questionable incident. But one question has been definitively answered:

Source 

Source 

• Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said his country is ready for a “doomsday” war with the U.S., but that he is leaving diplomacy on the table.
• Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps claimed it captured a U.S. Remus 600 unmanned underwater vehicle.
• U.S. President Donald Trump has rejected Iran’s most recent proposal and told aides he views renewed U.S. bombing after the midterm elections as likely, The Wall Street Journal reported.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Sunday that his country is ready for a “doomsday” war with the U.S., but that he is leaving diplomacy on the table so as not to “miss any chance for peace.”

Araghchi made the comments during an appearance on NBC News’ “Meet the Press” following last week’s United Nations General Assembly. The U.S. and Iran have been locked in an on-again, off-again war since Feb. 28, which has caused a global oil shock that has spiked gas prices and fanned the flames of inflation.

“If you ask us, there is no reason why we should go back to diplomacy, but I am still trying diplomacy because I think we shouldn’t miss any chance for peace,” Araghchi said. “We are ready to negotiate as much as we are ready to face any challenge … We stand firm in the face of any aggression against us, even if it comes to a doomsday war.”

Araghchi on Friday had proposed reopening the strait and resuming nuclear talks with the U.S. within seven days if the Trump administration accepts its conditions.

U.S. President Donald Trump recently rejected Iran’s proposal, which could have opened the critical chokepoint, the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has severely disrupted the strait during the conflict, restricting oil and gas exports out of the Persian Gulf. The Wall Street Journal reported that in addition to rejecting the deal, Trump said he expected to resume bombing Tehran after the U.S. midterm elections in November.

In a separate interview on NBC News, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Michael Waltz said that Iran’s most recent offer was a “cynical attempt to put something on the table that they knew was unacceptable.”

“The president will leave all options on the table to ensure the world is safe from Iran holding the world hostage with a nuclear weapon,” Waltz said.

Iran is sticking to its position that it would only reopen the crucial Hormuz strait if its conditions are met, despite a rebuke from Trump, while a senior Iranian military leader stressed his country’s readiness to continue fighting.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on Sunday claimed that it seized an autonomous U.S. submarine.

“Our conditions are clear; any progress toward the opening of the Strait of Hormuz is contingent upon the fulfillment of these conditions, and we will not back down from them,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a post on his Telegram channel translated by Google.

“During our meetings with mediators, these conditions were fully conveyed, explained, and elaborated upon, and the mediators, in turn, relayed them to the American side,” he said on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

In his latest statement, Araghchi said intermediaries between the U.S. and Iran have yet to relay a formal response from Trump to Tehran. “Only a negotiated solution can break this deadlock,” he said.

Tehran’s conditions include a halt to what it calls U.S. “acts of aggression,” an end to the naval blockade and economic warfare, and the release of Iranian assets, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said last week.

Iranian military leaders continued to underline their readiness to continue the war, which began on Feb. 28 with U.S. and Israeli air strikes on the country.

“The war is not over,” the Iranian Student News Agency quoted Iran’s army commander-in-chief, Amir Hatami, as saying. “We have won, but we must consolidate this victory, and the aggressor enemy, who has suffered heavy blows, must continue to be prepared to receive heavy blows from the soldiers of our beloved Iran,” he said.

Underwater drone

Continues …

Also see:

‘Not just a catch, an intelligence prize’: IRGC spox hails seizure of second US underwater drone

Iran to begin reverse-engineering captured US underwater drone: IRGC