<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>The Rights Of Man </title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-546588</id>
    <updated>2013-05-19T22:19:52+01:00</updated>
    <subtitle>The UK's leading website for raising issues about gender discrimination and sexual discrimination against men </subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/co/eFCe" /><feedburner:info uri="co/efce" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry>
        <title>BREAKTHROUGH WEEK IN THE FIGHT FOR EQUALITY FOR MEN AND BOYS</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/co/eFCe/~3/b4-Evpb3Asw/breakthroughweekequality.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/breakthroughweekequality.html" thr:count="12" thr:updated="2013-05-23T17:01:28+01:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341d03e253ef0192aa199d9f970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-19T22:19:52+01:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-19T22:22:42+01:00</updated>
        <summary>When we look back in some year’s time when it is fully recognised that equality applies to men too, I think all of us involved in the quest for equality for men will look at this week as being pivotal....</summary>
        <author>
            <name>About This Weblog</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs/Political" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Education" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Family Law" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="International Men's Day" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Justice System" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>When we look back in some year’s time when it is fully recognised that equality applies to men too, I think all of us involved in the quest for equality for men will look at this week as being<br />pivotal.</p>
<p>There are a number for reasons for this – men were talked about, it opened the door, and men are walking through it by taking matters in their own hands.</p>
<p><strong>Labour Party</strong></p>
<p>Firstly, there has been the fact that a mainstream party (Labour) are starting to talk about a men’s narrative, even though it is Labour (the party of Harriett Harman, Vera Baird, Yvette Cooper, Margaret Moran, Angela/Maria Eagle, Caroline Flint and others who actively hate men) who have brought in anti-male legislation (encouragement to Cafcass to be biased against fathers) and practices (Minister for Women but no Minister for Men – 16 years and counting...). </p>
<p>The Conservatives dabble but then skulk away (<a href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2011/01/more-on-dominic-raab-mp.html" target="_self">Dominic Raab </a>and <a href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/01/instutionaldiscrimaintioneducation.html" target="_self">David Willetts</a>) and the Lib Dems and in particular Cable wants to stop meritocracy in the boardroom. </p>
<p>So this week, the fact that both Jon Cruddas MP (Labour: Barking and Dagenham) <a href="http://www.joncruddas.org.uk/sites/joncruddas.org.uk/files/A%20childhood.pdf">spoke</a> at the IPPR think tank’s meeting in Manchester about Childhood and Family Issues. A key part of Labour’s policy work is to “Valuing a father's family role as highly as his working role; helping men play a larger part in looking after the home and the upbringing of their children”</p>
<p>“The Conservatives have dominated debate about the family with their stereotype of a  feckless underclass of absent fathers. They've concentrated on demonising a small minority and ignored the majority. Many fathers have two basic priorities; their family, and work to improve the lives of their children. And many feel that the Conservatives have failed them on both counts. No support<br />for fathers, and no jobs.”</p>
<p>Don’t anyone ever forget what Cameron <a href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2011/06/cameron-would-never-attack-mothers-on-mothers-day-but-happy-to-attack-fathers-on-fathers-day.html" target="_self">said</a> about Fathers on Father’s Day.</p>
<p>Then on Thursday, Dianne Abbott MP, a Labour MP who certainly has not been a friend<br />of men, <a href="http://www.demos.co.uk/files/DianeAbbottspeech16May2013.pdf">talks</a> about men and the cause of masculinity. Albeit her speech was terribly flawed and stereotypical (a male identity Fight Club masculinity crisis fuelled by Viagra and Jack<br />Daniels which was statistically demolished by <a href="http://freethoughtblogs.com/hetpat/2013/05/17/dear-diane-about-this-crisis/">Ally Fogg</a>)</p>
<p>Some quotes were:</p>
<p>“I believe we need to say loudly and clearly, that there is a powerful role for fathers. The truth is that just as loving fathers are a benefit to children, so loving families are a benefit to men. And that the ‘left’ must reclaim the debate about families.</p>
<p> “Our men have little movement politics to speak of. Many British men have no authentic<br />voice.”  </p>
<p>While it was welcome that she spoke about these issues it was through the wrong lens.<br />In that, it was based on that men are the problem and that the problems they face have not been down to (radical) feminism or the fact the government policy (so often an expression of anti-male feminism) has purposely ignored problems that affect men.</p>
<p>It is no good for Abbott and others to complain about falling educational attainment when this and previous governments have chosen to ignore it – the same on suicide, depression, unemployment, men’s health etc. She identifies the problem but is unwilling to look at what causes them or why there have been deliberate attempts (either overt or covert – discrimination by omission) not to do anything about them. All of the problems she highlighted that affected men, were framed as if they were caused by men – a feminist outlook rather than a neutral outlook. It was still based on the age-old premise that men are the problem. </p>
<p>But at least men are being talked about...</p>
<p>Media Coverage - <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/may/14/male-identity-crisis-machismo-abbott">Guardian</a>, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22530184">BBC 1</a>, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22556628">BBC 2</a></p>
<p><strong>Opening the Door</strong></p>
<p>As ever, it takes someone to open the door to allow an initial chink of light, and then there are people ready to step in.</p>
<p>Leading writers in the men’s equality movement, Glen Poole and Ally Fogg, took that opportunity.<br />Gen had two articles published (one in the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/15/why-crisis-masculinity-feminism">Guardian</a> and another in the <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2013/05/tories-feckless-dads-crisis-masculinity-can-labour-go-father">News Statesman</a>) and Ally was featured on the <a href="http://freethoughtblogs.com/hetpat/2013/05/17/dear-diane-about-this-crisis/">free thought</a> website, both talking about the issues raised this week and also Glen talking about the barriers (including the problem there is for feminism) men face. </p>
<p>In addition to the open challenges made by Glen and Ally, a range of other commentators jumped in to support Glen and Ally’s premise or to argue against Abbot’s stereotypes.</p>
<p>Other commentators include <a href="http://conservativehome.blogs.com/platform/2013/05/from-maxwindcowie.html">Max Wind-Cowie</a>, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/17/masculinity-fathers-generation-better-men">Ian Jack</a>, <a href="http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/comment/articles/2013-05/15/diane-abbott-mp-crisis-in-masculinity">Tony Parsons</a>, <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jakewallissimons/100217446/diane-abbotts-confused-attack-on-men/">Jake Wallis Simons</a> (Abbot gave a “has given a horrendously matronising and ham-fisted speech entitled "Britain's crisis<br />of masculinity.”), <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/welcome-to-diane-abbotts-viagra-and-jack-daniels-themed-crisis-in-masculinity-8618617.html">Amol Rajan</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/05/15/diane-abbot-masculinity-crisis_n_3277154.html">The Huffington Post</a>, <a href="http://www.metamute.org/community/your-posts/what-masculinity-crisis">Heartfield</a>, <a href="http://www.cps.org.uk/blog/q/date/2013/05/19/men-need-families/">Belinda Brown</a>, <a href="http://afternyne.com/2013/05/15/diane-abbott-viagra-jack-daniels-culture-creating-a-crisis-of-masculinity/" target="_self">After Nyne </a>and <a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tony-parsons-crisis-masculinity-golden-1895551">Tony<br />Parsons</a> again.  </p>
<p>Of course no one was naive enough to think it would be all one way, and the more people start to talk about male inequality, the more likely anti-male feminists (male and female) will fight back – they have careers in male-bashing to hang onto, remmeber. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/16/masculinity-crisis-men">Laurie Penney</a> (who said Glen Poole’s article was based on the tackling the evils of feminism – probably the most laughable and desperate comment ever published in the Guardian), <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/15/angry-men-wont-discuss-rape-abuse">Suzanne Moore</a> and <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/if-men-are-in-crisis-the-answer-is-feminism-8621335.html">Matt Hill</a> who believes feminism is the answer.</p>
<p><strong>Walking through it</strong></p>
<p>Glen Poole sent an email around this week outlining a number of events where the growing men and boys sector are “doing it for themselves”.</p>
<p>There is no point complaining about the need for equality for men or ending discrimination against them or that people ignore the problems men and boys face nelss people are doing something positive and practical about it. The email is set out at the end.</p>
<p>In addition, Mike Buchanan held his <a href="http://j4mb.wordpress.com/2013/05/14/j4mb-first-public-meeting-bedford-saturday-18-may/" target="_self">first meeting </a>for his Justice for Men and Boys (and the women who love them) political party in Bedford. </p>
<p>Again, rather than being passive, it is about being active and controlling the agenda and changing society’s views and providing solutions.</p>
<p>Labour have raised the issued, starting the debate – others have taken it forward and given it a wider airing – but more importantly others are providing solutions. A pivotal week - a week to remember</p>
<p><em>Posted by Skimmington</em></p>
<p> </p>
<h4>Notice for people helping men and boys....</h4>
This is a short email update to make sure you know about three events for people like you who are committed to improving the lives of men and boys in the UK:<br /><br />This year’s <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Third National Conference for Men and Boys</span></strong><strong> </strong>is taking place in September over five days covering issues like health, mental health, fatherhood, education, male mentoring, criminal justice, social care, religion, personal development, building the men and boys sector  and much, much<br />more…..<br /><br />To find out about the UK’s T<strong>hird National Conference for Men and Boys </strong>in September and book<br />your early bird tickets <a href="http://mensconferenceuk.wordpress.com/day-by-day/" target="_self"><strong>click here now</strong></a><br /><br />This year’s <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Men’s Health Week</span></strong> takes place during June and <strong>Helping Men</strong> will be marking the week by hosting its <strong>Helping Men Get Help</strong> workshop in Brighton on Wednesday 12th June. This one-day course is designed for people like you who may want to develop their ability to help more men and boys to<br />access or engage with the services and projects you run <br /><br />To find out how you can come and take part in the <a href="http://helpingmenblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/helping-men-get-help-course_18.html" target="_self"><strong>Helping Men Get Help</strong> <strong>workshop</strong></a> in June and buy a half-price ticket today <a href="http://helpingmenblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/helping-men-get-help-course_18.html" target="_self"><strong>click here now</strong></a><br /><br />Finally a reminder that <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">International Men’s Day</span></strong> takes place on Tuesday 19<sup>th</sup> November and is a great platform who you to promote the work you do with men and boys, or to help you connect more men<br />and boys to your work <br /><br />The theme of this year’s <strong>International Men’s Day</strong> is Keeping Men and Boys Safe and you can use the<br />day to promote any theme you want as long as it’s helping to improve the lives of men and boys in the UK.To find out more about<strong> International Men’s Day </strong>in November <a href="http://helpingmenblog.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/international-mens-day-2013-theme.html" target="_self"><strong>click here now</strong></a><br /><br /><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/co/eFCe/~4/b4-Evpb3Asw" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/breakthroughweekequality.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>NEWS UPDATE</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/co/eFCe/~3/mIbkmoWE4qU/news-update-1.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/news-update-1.html" thr:count="14" thr:updated="2013-05-21T14:00:00+01:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341d03e253ef01901c19620e970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-13T20:32:00+01:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-12T21:00:31+01:00</updated>
        <summary>A few in the last few days - thanks to those who forward them Men's Matters - The latest from James Williams, now on YouTube Bedford Today - Leader of new party to stand in Bedford Daily Mail - We...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>About This Weblog</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs/Political" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News Update" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>A few in the last few days - thanks to those who forward them</p>
<p>Men's Matters - The latest from James Williams, now on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWK2DICrWwg" target="_self">YouTube</a></p>
<p>Bedford Today - <a href="http://www.bedfordtoday.co.uk/news/local/exclusive-new-party-leader-to-stand-in-bedford-1-5073757" target="_self">Leader of new party to stand in Bedford</a></p>
<p>Daily Mail - <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2321531/We-fought-equality-So-greedy-wives-sponge-ex-husbands.html" target="_self">We fought for equality so we why do greedy wives sponge off of ex-husbands </a>(Liz Hodgkinson)</p>
<p>Huffington Post - <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/clairelouise-meadows/womens-issues-mens-issues_b_3228655.html" target="_self">Interview with Peter Lloyd (</a>Claire-Louise Meadows)</p>
<p>A Voice for Men radio - <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/avoiceformen/2013/05/11/domestic-violence-revelations-with-erin-pizzey-episode-1" target="_self">Erin Pizzey</a></p>
<p>BBC Men's Hour - <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00t32zg" target="_self">Mental health</a> (12 May 2013 episode)</p>
<p>The Guardian - <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2013/may/08/lad-culture-student-feminism" target="_self">Is university lad culture causing a rise in feminist societies </a>(Emily Hilton) - <em>Emily is obvioulsy a wannabe rising star of "telling untruths enough times they turn to facts". Get this: "Frustrated by sexism and misogyny on campus, increasing numbers of students are setting up feminist groups at their universities.". What misogyny? For every seven people who go to univeristy these days, four are women and three are men.</em></p>
<p>Posted by Skimmington </p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/co/eFCe/~4/mIbkmoWE4qU" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/news-update-1.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>PARISH NOTICE - J4MB PUBLIC MEETING</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/co/eFCe/~3/gV-E45tk_Jo/parish-notice-j4mb-public-meeting.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/parish-notice-j4mb-public-meeting.html" thr:count="26" thr:updated="2013-05-17T14:19:32+01:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341d03e253ef0191020f5a03970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-12T20:25:42+01:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-12T20:25:42+01:00</updated>
        <summary>As you may know, I lead the recently-registered political party Justice for men &amp; boys (and the women who love them) - henceforth 'J4MB'. We plan to change the face of British politics. Our blog's here http://j4mb.wordpress.com. We intend to...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>About This Weblog</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs/Political" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">As you may know, I lead the recently-registered political party <strong>Justice for men &amp; <br />boys (and the women who love them) </strong>- henceforth 'J4MB'. We plan to change the face of British politics. Our blog's here <a href="http://j4mb.wordpress.com">http://j4mb.wordpress.com</a>. <br /><br />We intend to contest the top 30 Conservative marginal seats at the 2015  general election, and recently announced that Ray Barry, the leader of another political party - The Equal Parenting Alliance <a href="http://equalparentingalliance.org">http://equalparentingalliance.org</a> - is  going to contest the Wolverhampton South West seat for our party in 2015. <br /><br />Two days ago the influential American men's human rights website 'A Voice for Men' published an article in which I revealed for the first time that I'll be contesting the Bedford &amp; Kempston seat in 2015. The article revealed more about our strategy than we've previously revealed: <br /><br /> <a href="http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-governance-feminism/j4mb-buchanan-moving-forward/">http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-governance-feminism/j4mb-buchanan-moving-forward/</a>     <br /><br />I should like to invite you to the first public meeting of our party, to be held 15:00 - 17:00 on 18 May (doors open 14:45). The venue is the Harpur Suite bar, in the centre of Bedford. I intend to start with a presentation of around 30 minutes' duration, followed by 90 minutes of Q&amp;A, discussions etc. We're<br />charging £5.00 admission to cover costs, any surplus will be added to the party's funds. Nobody associated with J4MB draws any income from party funds. To reserve a place - there are only 25 places available - please make a minimum donation of £5.00 through the link below. Thank you.<br /><br /> <a href="http://j4mb.wordpress.com/donate/">http://j4mb.wordpress.com/donate/</a><br /><br />We're doing all we can to make the future brighter for men and boys, and the women who love them.<br /><br /> Best wishes,<br /><br /> <br /><br />Mike Buchanan<br /><br /><br /><br /><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/co/eFCe/~4/gV-E45tk_Jo" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/parish-notice-j4mb-public-meeting.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>NEWS UPDATE</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/co/eFCe/~3/-0M2RpBdkEs/news-update.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/news-update.html" thr:count="6" thr:updated="2013-05-12T08:25:22+01:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341d03e253ef01901be0e9e3970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-09T07:03:00+01:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-06T19:52:47+01:00</updated>
        <summary>As ever, here are a few below but keep checking the Fighting Feminism and Helping Men websites for UK based stories. The Guardian - The other gender divide (Mona Chalabi) Very welcome piece but framed from a feminist perspective bizarrely...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>About This Weblog</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Domestic Violence" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Health" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="News Update" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>As ever, here are a few below but keep checking the <a href="http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com/2013/05/" target="_self">Fighting Feminism and</a> <a href="http://helpingmenblog.blogspot.co.uk/" target="_self">Helping </a>Men websites for UK based stories.</p>
<p>The Guardian - <a href="http://m.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2013/may/07/men-gender-divide-feminism" target="_self">The other gender divide </a>(Mona Chalabi) <em>Very welcome piece but framed from a feminist perspective bizarrely ('It's difficult to deny that women suffer more than men as a result of their gender') - it is almost like an apology has to be written before the Guardian will accept anything about men.</em></p>
<p> </p>
<p> The Independent - <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/need-knows-no-gender-8599208.html" target="_self">Need knows no gender </a>(Ally Fogg) <em>Brilliant piece from Ally including coverage of Earl Silverman - a male equality hero. </em>Plus Barbara kay<a href="http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2013/04/29/barbara-kay-male-victims-of-domestic-abuse-continue-to-suffer-in-solitude/" target="_self"> article</a>.</p>
<p>Men's Heath Forum - <a href="http://www.menshealthforum.org.uk/mhw" target="_self">Men's Health Week</a></p>
<p>News Statesman - <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/2013/05/uncomfortable-truth-why-do-more-men-women-commit-suicide" target="_self">The uncomfortable truth about male suicide </a>(Holly Baxter)</p>
<p>Voice for Men - <a href="http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/karen-straughan-at-ny-libertarian-convention/" target="_self">Karen Straughan presentation</a> <em>brilliant presentation should be compulsory on any gender studies course</em></p>
<p>Karen Ingala-Smith - <a href="http://kareningalasmith.wordpress.com/2013/04/29/this-thing-about-male-victims/" target="_self">This thing about male victims</a> <em>proof beyond doubt that some people don't want to recognise male victims exist!</em></p>
<p>Hiromi Uehara - <a href="http://oliversin.eu/drawings/hiromi-uehara-piano-woman" target="_self">Piano Woman</a></p>
<p>MRA LOndon - <a href="http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/1738600-Radfem-2013-and-the-MRAs?pg=7" target="_self">Mumsnet discussion</a></p>
<p> Newsletter - <a href="http://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/regional/justice-chief-warns-against-positive-discrimination-1-5051333" target="_self">Ulster judge warns against positive discrimination</a></p>
<p>The Guardian - <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/02/feminism-trashing-shulamith-firestone" target="_self">Feminism is not strong enough </a>(Jill Filipovic)</p>
<p><em>Posted by Skimmington</em></p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/co/eFCe/~4/-0M2RpBdkEs" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/news-update.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>MOTHERS ARE OVERSEAS CHILD ABDUCTORS IN THREE IN FOUR CASES - WHY IS IT A SECRET?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/co/eFCe/~3/8VWnUSfyVks/femalechildabductorsyisitasecret.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/femalechildabductorsyisitasecret.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-05-10T16:08:58+01:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341d03e253ef017eeade1e34970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-09T06:07:00+01:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-06T18:48:49+01:00</updated>
        <summary>When Reunite International published its figures earlier this year that showed that 70% of parents who abduct their children and take them abroad are mothers, many of us in with an interest in this were not surprised. You only have...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>About This Weblog</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs/Political" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Family Law" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Women-only" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>When Reunite International<a href="http://www.reunite.org/news/reunite_sees_a_sharp_increase_in_the_number_of_children_parentally_abducted.asp" target="_self"> published its figures </a>earlier this year that showed that 70% of parents who abduct their children and take them abroad are mothers, many of us in with an interest in this were not surprised. You only have to be aware of the problems faced by fathers who call organisations like Reunite or <a href="http://www.fnf.org.uk/law-and-information/abduction" target="_self">Families Need Fathers</a> to know about this.</p>
<p>The Guardian covered the story with <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2013/apr/13/my-daughter-was-abducted" target="_self">two examples </a> also this poor chap talks about it on BBC Men's Hour about his abducted <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01s9h1h" target="_self">daughter</a> (and not the son - radical feminists are rejoicing) who is now living in Tunisia.</p>
<p>Back in December, the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20683202" target="_self">BBC published </a>a story that  according to the<a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/parental-child-abduction-is-a-worldwide-problem" target="_self"> FCO research</a>, "74% of people thought fathers were most likely to abduct their children but statistics from Reunite International suggest 70% of their cases concern mothers taking the child." </p>
<p>The number of <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22358741" target="_self">litigation and disputes is also on the increase</a>.</p>
<p>What is staggering though is that firstly the lack of awareness that mothers are the main abductors in three of four cases where the children are taken abroad. Such is the anti-male society we live in and the way that society (pushed by radical feminists) have demonised men that anything negative to do with children and parents is automatically assumed to be down to fathers and men. </p>
<p>This is of course not helped when the litigation results came out this month and there was much discussion about them but no one wanted to make the connection to mothers - it was like some sort of dirty secret. Nothing on Mumsnet?</p>
<p>Why is it a secret? If the statistics showed it was three in four men - it would be front pages news. </p>
<p><em>Posted by Skimmington</em></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/co/eFCe/~4/8VWnUSfyVks" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/femalechildabductorsyisitasecret.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>O2 AND SYMANTEC ADMIT THAT FATHERS RIGHTS AREN'T HATEFUL</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/co/eFCe/~3/48yLSR78vIs/o2-and-symantec-admit-that-fathers-rights-arent-hateful.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/o2-and-symantec-admit-that-fathers-rights-arent-hateful.html" thr:count="3" thr:updated="2013-05-09T21:32:43+01:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341d03e253ef019101ea775c970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-09T03:36:30+01:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-09T03:36:30+01:00</updated>
        <summary>I haven't heard any updates from O2 and Symantec recently over their defamation and censorship of men's human rights sites, so I decided to reexamine the list of sites (it now stands at almost 90). It seems to have been...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Kimble</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs/Political" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Education" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="False Accusations" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">I haven't heard any updates from O2 and Symantec recently over their defamation and censorship of men's human rights sites, so I decided to reexamine the list of sites (it now stands at almost 90). It seems to have been worth my while and there is a least a little good news.<br /><br />Previously, following my complaints, Glenn Sacks of Fathers and Families had <a href="http://www.hisside.com" target="_self">his site</a> unblocked, similalrly <a href="http://www.daddy.typepad.com%20" target="_self">the other unblocked site</a> also pertained to fathers' issues. O2 <a href="https://twitter.com/O2/status/332075080744067072" target="_self">appeared to be standing by</a> their hate smears, indicating as such on Twitter just yesterday and have not mentioned any more sites being unblocked. In reality, my testing shows a number of additional father related sites have been unblocked and are no longer suffering this vile defamation. These include:<br />
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.angrydad.blogspot.com" target="_self">http://www.angrydad.blogspot.com</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.framedfathers.blogspot.com" target="_self">http://www.framedfathers.blogspot.com</a></li>
</ul>
This now leaves father-related sites as quite a small minority on the "hate" list, and suggests that Symantec and O2 are slowly coming round to the idea of equality for fathers being a legitimate issue. Of course it goes without saying that they are still firmly against any other men's issues being addressed such as rape, abuse, false imprisonment and domestic violence. The only other possible scenario is that they just have absolutely no idea what they're doing.<br /><br />In total O2 and Symantec have now reclassified eight sites since I started this exercise, others include the following:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.gabnet.com/lit/demoh10.htm" target="_self">http://www.gabnet.com/lit/demoh10.htm</a><br /><a href="http://www.barnoz.wordpress.com" target="_self">http://www.barnoz.wordpress.com</a><br /><a href="http://www.rulymob.com" target="_self">http://www.rulymob.com</a><br /><a href="http://www.womenagainstvawa.org" target="_self">http://www.womenagainstvawa.org</a> (wasn't actually smeared as hate, but wrongly censored due to being given a "pornography" classification)<br /><br />I've no idea if Symantec and O2 have apologised to the owners of those sites, though given that they haven't even publicised the unblocking, I doubt there has been any communication never mind a much needed apology. Perhaps site owners can confirm this? Anyway, just another 80 to go….<br /><br /><em>by John Kimble</em><br /><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/co/eFCe/~4/48yLSR78vIs" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/o2-and-symantec-admit-that-fathers-rights-arent-hateful.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>SEVEN MORE MEN'S HUMAN RIGHTS SITES SMEARED AND CENSORED BY SYMANTEC</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/co/eFCe/~3/lNiRQtLx5qw/seven-more-mens-human-rights-sites-smeared-and-censored-by-symantec.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/seven-more-mens-human-rights-sites-smeared-and-censored-by-symantec.html" thr:count="3" thr:updated="2013-05-08T22:02:08+01:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341d03e253ef019101df621f970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-08T00:01:00+01:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-08T07:11:23+01:00</updated>
        <summary>Given the renewed interest in the topic of censorship of mens' human rights sites, I decided to test a few more sites. The censorship problem is worsening and I've discovered more excellent resources being blocked such as the brilliant false...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>John Kimble</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs/Political" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="False Accusations" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Justice System" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Given the renewed interest in the topic of censorship of mens' human rights sites, I decided to test a few more sites.<br /><br />The censorship problem is worsening and I've discovered more excellent resources being blocked such as the brilliant false rape society blog. Perhaps my personal favourite from this new batch is Daddyjustice.com, the site of Ben Vonderheide, a truly dedicated and hugely successful activist committed to tackling injustice and corruption. Be sure to pay the site a visit to counter these attempts attempt to deny him traffic. Here's  Daddy Justice in action, lets hope O2 and Symantec watch it and see exactly who are the truely hateful and violent ones:<br /><br /><iframe frameborder="0" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nGRCJU9NyAY?feature=oembed" width="459" /> <br /><br />Sites Symantec/O2now classes as "hateful" include:<br /><br />
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.dadsandthings.com" target="_self">dadsandthings.com</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.daddyjustice.com" target="_self">daddyjustice.com</a></li>
<li><a href="http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com" target="_self">falserapesociety.blogspot.com</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.feministcritics.org" target="_self">feministcritics.org</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.judgybitch.com" target="_self">judgybitch.com</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.menaregood.com" target="_self">menaregood.com</a></li>
<li><a href="http://sonsofperseus.blogspot.com" target="_self">sonsofperseus.blogspot.com</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.the-spearhead.com" target="_self">the-spearhead.com</a></li>
</ul>
<p>
<br />As you can see, Symantec's misnadry is now so extreme that even suggesting "men are good" appears to result in the "hate site" tag. I'll shortly be adding hte seven sites above to the <a href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/02/the-48-mens-human-rights-sites-feminists-seek-to-censor.html" target="_self">main list showing all the wrongly blocked and defamed sites</a>.<br /><br />On the plus side of things, I've now put so much work into this and tested so many sites, that I appear to have inadvertently created an impressive directory of high quality men's human rights sites, so once again the feminist censorship backfires. Readers are more than welcome to take my list and create a men's rights directory.<br /><br /><em>by John Kimble</em></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Update - just found a couple more sites that are being blocked and defmamed:</p>
<p><a href="http://eternalbachelor.wordpress.com/" target="_self">http://eternalbachelor.wordpress.com/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://triggeralert.blogspot.com/" target="_self">http://triggeralert.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p><em><br /></em></p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/co/eFCe/~4/lNiRQtLx5qw" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/seven-more-mens-human-rights-sites-smeared-and-censored-by-symantec.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>THE HYPOCRISY OF POLLY NEATE AND WOMEN'S AID</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/co/eFCe/~3/UEs8nX4RS8g/the-hypocrisy-of-polly-neate-and-womens-aid.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/the-hypocrisy-of-polly-neate-and-womens-aid.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341d03e253ef019101e002f9970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-07T23:06:02+01:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-07T23:06:02+01:00</updated>
        <summary>Two weeks ago, this site wrote about the issue where Women's Aid desperately did not want to allow an article in The Independent about male victims of domestic abuse to not take into account female victims. So today, Women's Hour...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>About This Weblog</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Domestic Violence" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Two weeks ago, this site <a href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/04/womensaidandrefuge.html" target="_self">wrote</a> about the issue where Women's Aid desperately did not want to allow an article in The Independent about male victims of domestic abuse to not take into account female victims.</p>
<p>So today, Women's Hour had a <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p018pwlm" target="_self">section</a> about the financial aspects of domestic abuse. So did Polly Neate, the CEO of Women's Aid mention both female and male victims of this sinister side of domestic abuse? Of course not - the hypocrisy is both overwhelming yet not surprising.</p>
<p><em> Posted by Skimmington</em></p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/co/eFCe/~4/UEs8nX4RS8g" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/the-hypocrisy-of-polly-neate-and-womens-aid.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>WANTED: UK'S WORST ANTI-MALE ADVERTS</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/co/eFCe/~3/izwc4hkZwW0/wanted-uks-worst-anti-male-adverts.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/wanted-uks-worst-anti-male-adverts.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2013-05-14T23:01:31+01:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341d03e253ef017eeade6a6b970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-07T18:49:00+01:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-07T18:49:00+01:00</updated>
        <summary>Yesterday, I published the story about Hyundai and thought it would be good to publish a montage of Britain's worst anti-male ads. If you have a link to the ad on Youtube or just want to mention it (and we...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>About This Weblog</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><a href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/howinnoceaneuropecanseekpenance.html" target="_self">Yesterday</a>, I published the story about Hyundai and thought it would be good to publish a montage of Britain's worst anti-male ads.</p>
<p>If you have a link to the ad on Youtube or just want to mention it (and we can try and track it down) please list in the comments section.</p>
<p><em>Posted by Skimmington</em></p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/co/eFCe/~4/izwc4hkZwW0" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/wanted-uks-worst-anti-male-adverts.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>THE BANK NOTE PETITION AND FEMINIST MCCARTHYISM - WHY DO THEY HATE MEN SO MUCH?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/co/eFCe/~3/0jk3MMnJO68/banknotepetitionandfeministmccarthyism.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/banknotepetitionandfeministmccarthyism.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2013-05-07T17:12:52+01:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341d03e253ef019101d631a7970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-07T05:09:00+01:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-06T17:39:54+01:00</updated>
        <summary>Feminist McCarthyism is poisonous strand of modern radical feminism that believes that every man is a secret women-hater and that every decision that is not pro-female is due to a cabal of men making decisions in smoke-field rooms to keep...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>About This Weblog</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs/Political" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Women-only" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Feminist <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism" target="_self">McCarthyism</a> is poisonous strand of modern radical feminism that believes that every man is a secret women-hater and that every decision that is not pro-female is due to a cabal of men making decisions in smoke-field rooms to keep women in the kitchen. </p>
<p>It is a particularly noxious brand of feminist which is not pro-equality and is espoused by the Guardian, Fawcett Society, many in the government (Government Equalities Department especially) and a whole bunch of radical feminists who see conspiracies and women-haters everywhere.</p>
<p>The campaign and petition to ensure that a woman is on a British banknote has reached absurd levels of feminist McCarthyism. There must be some conspiracy behind the decision to replace Elizabeth Fry with Winston Churchill?</p>
<p>There is even now a <a href="http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/bank-of-england-keep-a-woman-on-english-banknotes" target="_self">petition</a> and the metropolitan elites and other outlets (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/the-womens-blog-with-jane-martinson/poll/2013/may/01/poll-which-woman-on-banknotes" target="_self">Guardian,</a> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/05/02/bank-of-england-petition-elizabeth-fry-winston-churchill_n_3199333.html?utm_hp_ref=uk" target="_self">Huffington<br />Post</a>) have got behind it. The Chancellor's Aide <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amber_Rudd" target="_self">Amber Rudd MP </a>as well...as reported in the <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/with-churchill-set-fair-for-the-five-pound-note-what-price-equality-show-me-the-money-women-8591836.html" target="_self">Independent</a> and <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/news/article-2317766/Petition-woman-English-banknotes-gains-momentum-13-500-sign-Bank-reveals-Churchill-replace-Elizabeth-Fry.html" target="_self">Daily Mail</a>.</p>
<p>The petition states "An all-male line-up on our banknotes sends out the damaging message that no woman has done anything important enough to appear." No proof anywhere of that at all!</p>
<p>The petition even tries to say the Queen does not count because she is hereditary.</p>
<p>But surely only a few can say that the Queen does not do a good job and also that means women as well. What McCarthyist feminists like those mentioned and  especially Caroline Criado-Perez of the <a href="http://www.thewomensroom.org.uk/" target="_self">Women's Room</a> are really saying is that the Queen was not chosen by them so that doesn't count.</p>
<p>What the petition does is show is the absurdity of McCarthyite Feminism, how anti-male it is by seeking to place every decision that they do not agree with as being part of some patriachal conspiracy effectively portraying us all as women-haters. </p>
<p>And it also shows how out of touch they are with normal women (and normal men). How many of the UK's 30 million women are going to sign this - hardly any - and the reason is simple - they do not see the sexism that the Mccarthyite's see because it is not there. The Empresses have no clothes</p>
<p><em> Posted by Skimmington </em></p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/co/eFCe/~4/0jk3MMnJO68" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>



    <feedburner:origLink>http://therightsofman.typepad.co.uk/the_rights_of_man/2013/05/banknotepetitionandfeministmccarthyism.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 -->
