<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Collins, McDonald &amp; Gann Supplement Counsel</title>
	
	<link>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog</link>
	<description>Keeping Industry Ahead of the Curve</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:54:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel" /><feedburner:info uri="collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Hot Topic: New Dietary Ingredients</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~3/Af3UQTCVTiY/hot-topic-new-dietary-ingredients</link>
		<comments>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/hot-topic-new-dietary-ingredients#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dietary Supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dietary supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New dietary ingredient]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/?p=792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FDA’s new Draft Guidance on New Dietary Ingredients continues to be a hot topic for those in the dietary supplement industry.  Rick Collins recently presented his thoughts on the subject at Nutracon 2012, an annual industry conference held in Anaheim, California, in conjunction with Expo West.  Rick was joined by John Zenk and Elan Sudberg [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cmgesqblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/vitamins.jpg"><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px 6px;" title="vitamins" src="http://cmgesqblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/vitamins.jpg" alt="" width="56" height="65" /></a>FDA’s  new Draft Guidance on New Dietary Ingredients continues to be a hot  topic for those in the dietary supplement industry.  Rick Collins  recently presented his thoughts on the subject at Nutracon 2012, an  annual industry conference held in Anaheim, California, in conjunction  with Expo West.  Rick was joined by John Zenk and Elan Sudberg for the  session entitled “NDI: From a Legal, Medical &amp; Testing  Perspective.”  The session description was as follows:<span id="more-792"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>In this comprehensive session on NDI, our experts will  cover Medical, Legal and Identification issues. Dr. Zenk, the Chief  Medical Officer of Humanetics Corporation, will speak on his company’s  experience in filing six premarket notifications for new dietary  ingredients.  His discussion will include a description of the  ingredients, the filing content, the filing process and the outcomes of  the filings.  Understanding this process and identifying the importance  of obtaining the NDI designation offers long-term opportunities for  companies eventually marketing these ingredients.  In the second segment  Mr. Elan Sudberg, Chief Executive Officer of Alkemists Laboratories,  will discuss his company’s expertise in analytical  development/validation work and related challenges supporting proficient  fit-for-purpose testing of New Dietary Ingredients and related finished  products. His presentation will include critical decision making steps  considering costs and timing for new dietary ingredients/products with  respect to development and validation strategies, routine vs.  non-routine quality control testing, outsourcing best practices and  investigative approaches to solving labels claim discrepancies  throughout the supply chain. In the third segment Mr. Collins, a lawyer  with extensive experience in the field of nutritional supplements, will  speak on the changing legal landscape of new dietary ingredients  (NDI’s).  The controversial highlights of the FDA’s new Draft Guidance  on NDI’s will be explored, including an evaluation of the burdens placed  upon industry in the Notification process.  Also discussed will be the  FDA’s recent enforcement efforts involving supplement products which  contain substances that fail to meet the criteria for a dietary  ingredient, ranging from warning letters to criminal prosecutions  against companies and/or their principals. Finally there will be a panel  discussion and questions from the audience will be encouraged.  <a href="http://www.nutraconference.com/nutracon12/public/SessionDetails.aspx?SessionID=1006100">http://www.nutraconference.com/nutracon12/public/SessionDetails.aspx?SessionID=1006100</a></p></blockquote>
<p>The session was well-attended and was followed by question-and-answer interactions with the audience.</p>
<p>New Dietary Ingredients were also a hot topic in Washington this  month.  Members of the House of Representatives submitted a letter to  FDA threatening Congressional action if the agency fails to withdraw or  substantially revise its Draft Guidance on NDI’s.  Rep. Dan Burton and  16 other House members contacted FDA after efforts by Senators Orrin  Hatch and Tom Harkin were unsuccessful in getting FDA to reevaluate or  withdraw those provisions of the guidance deemed inconsistent with the  intent of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA).  The  House letter increases the pressure on FDA to rein back the more  objectionable provisions by warning that in the “unfortunate event that  FDA does not withdraw or reconsider this guidance as requested,  legislation to clarify (DSHEA) will be considered.”</p>
<p>Collins, McDonald &amp; Gann will keep a close eye on developments as  they unfold in Washington.  Those in industry who have questions about  the Draft Guidance should feel free to call us at 516-294-0300.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~4/Af3UQTCVTiY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/hot-topic-new-dietary-ingredients/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/hot-topic-new-dietary-ingredients?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=hot-topic-new-dietary-ingredients</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Collins Presents Five Time UFC Champion Randy Couture With Honorary Plaque from “Leap for Life”</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~3/zGXKa4Iwadc/rick-collins-presents-five-time-ufc-champion-randy-couture-with-honorary-plaque-from-%e2%80%9cleap-for-life%e2%80%9d</link>
		<comments>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/rick-collins-presents-five-time-ufc-champion-randy-couture-with-honorary-plaque-from-%e2%80%9cleap-for-life%e2%80%9d#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing and Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leap for Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randy Couture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Collins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/?p=787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honors MMA Superstar for Couture’s Lifetime Achievement and Role in Charitable Endeavors Rick Collins recently presented MMA superstar and actor Randy Couture with a special award to commemorate Couture’s contributions to the sports/fitness arena and his philanthropic work.  Collins, the founder of the worldwide fundraiser “The Global Leap for Life” (www.leapforlife.org) — a unique skydiving [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><strong>Honors MMA Superstar for Couture’s Lifetime Achievement and Role in Charitable Endeavors </strong></h4>
<p><a href="http://cmgesqblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Rick_Randy_Couture_2012_4.jpg"><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 10px;" title="Rick_Randy_Couture_2012_#4" src="http://cmgesqblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Rick_Randy_Couture_2012_4-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>Rick  Collins recently presented MMA superstar and actor Randy Couture with a  special award to commemorate Couture’s contributions to the  sports/fitness arena and his philanthropic work.  Collins, the founder  of the worldwide fundraiser “The Global Leap for Life” (<a href="http://www.leapforlife.org/">www.leapforlife.org</a>)  — a unique skydiving fundraising initiative that to-date has raised  nearly $100,000 for charity — presented Couture with a plaque on behalf  of Leap for Life at the recent Arnold Sports Festival held earlier this  month, in Columbus, Ohio, and attracting more than 175,000 sports and  fitness enthusiasts from across the country.   The plaque was presented  in honor of Couture’s longtime leadership both as one of the most  successful mixed martial arts fighters of all time, as well as the  important role he has played through his many charitable endeavors.<span id="more-787"></span></p>
<p>Presenting Couture with the award on the EXPO stage at the 2012  Arnold Sports Festival, Collins noted Couture’s many contributions not  only to MMA history but his groundbreaking work in founding and growing  his charity –The Xtreme Couture GI Foundation (<a href="http://www.xcgif.org/">www.xcgif.org</a>.)   The Xtreme Couture GI Foundation is a 501 (c) 3 non-profit corporation  founded by Couture to honor the veterans of America’s armed forces,  with the goal of raising money and awareness for those wounded in action  and their families.</p>
<p>“On behalf of Leap for Life, we wanted to recognize Randy for his  continuing contributions not only to the sports and fitness arena, but  to honor him for the tremendous work he is doing with the Xtreme Couture  GI Foundation,” said Collins, a partner at Collins, McDonald &amp; Gann  which celebrated its tenth year of sponsorship of the Arnold Amateur  competitions this year.  “In fact, we are so moved by the work being  done by Randy and his charity in helping our country’s veterans that we  are now in discussions to raise money for the Xtreme Couture GI  Foundation through the 2012 Global Leap for Life, scheduled to take  place in August.”</p>
<p>Further details about the 2012 Global Leap for Life will be  forthcoming, and Collins remains excited about moving forward to raise  awareness, and funds, to help the Xtreme Couture GI Foundation’s  mission.  Previously, Collins had encouraged hundreds of people across  the globe to “skydive for a cause” to raise money for cancer research,  and is looking forward to now also raising a significant amount of money  for this important cause, as well.</p>
<p>For more information about Rick Collins, including information about  the Global Leap for Life and links to last year’s event, visit <a href="http://www.rickcollins.com/">www.rickcollins.com</a>.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~4/zGXKa4Iwadc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/rick-collins-presents-five-time-ufc-champion-randy-couture-with-honorary-plaque-from-%e2%80%9cleap-for-life%e2%80%9d/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/rick-collins-presents-five-time-ufc-champion-randy-couture-with-honorary-plaque-from-%e2%80%9cleap-for-life%e2%80%9d?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rick-collins-presents-five-time-ufc-champion-randy-couture-with-honorary-plaque-from-%25e2%2580%259cleap-for-life%25e2%2580%259d</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Continuing Our Leadership Role in the Sports/Fitness Arena… As We Head To The Arnold Classic for Our 10th Year</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~3/gOKCaIJ2_Yk/continuing-our-leadership-role-in-the-sportsfitness-arena%e2%80%a6-as-we-head-to-the-arnold-classic-for-our-10th-year</link>
		<comments>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/continuing-our-leadership-role-in-the-sportsfitness-arena%e2%80%a6-as-we-head-to-the-arnold-classic-for-our-10th-year#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Collins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Sports Festival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sponsor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Arnold]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/?p=783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This coming weekend, CMG will once again have a major presence at the Arnold Sports Festival in Columbus, Ohio – as we continue our tradition of sponsorship for this event that has  become the largest multi-sport event in the nation.  For the tenth consecutive year, CMG will proudly be in attendance at “The Arnold”  (which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px 6px;" title="The Arnold" src="http://cmgesqblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Arnold-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" />This coming weekend, CMG will once again have a major presence at the  Arnold Sports Festival in Columbus, Ohio – as we continue our tradition  of sponsorship for this event that has  become the largest multi-sport  event in the nation.  For the tenth consecutive year, CMG will proudly  be in attendance at “The Arnold”  (which takes place from March 1<sup>st</sup> – 4<sup>th</sup> ) – where more than  175,000 fitness enthusiasts will gather to  experience thrilling moments of sports competition and fitness  entertainment.  In addition, attendees at this major event will also  have the chance to experience the 700-booth Arnold Fitness EXPO offering  the biggest names in health &amp; fitness who present the latest trends  in fitness apparel, supplements, and training equipment.</p>
<p>Once again, CMG will be a sponsor of the Arnold Amateur  competitions.  CMG partners Rick Collins and Marc Gann will be up on the  EXPO stage handing out trophies to the contest winners midday on  Saturday.  Also, this year we are particularly excited to announce that  Rick Collins is scheduled to present a special award to MMA superstar  Randy Couture.  Couture – three-time Heavyweight UFC Champion and  two-time Light Heavyweight Champion – remains one of the most successful  figures in MMA history.  He is also an actor who can be seen in <em>The Expendables </em>and <em>The Expendables 2</em> – working alongside major action stars including Sylvester Stallone,  Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jet Li, Eric Roberts, Steve Austin and Jason  Statham, among others.  Rick, the founder of the Leap for Life  fund-raiser (<a href="http://www.leapforlife.org/">www.leapforlife.org</a>),  will be presenting Randy with a Lifetime Achievement Award for his  outstanding career achievements and charitable endeavors on Friday at  11:45 AM on the EXPO stage — photos and more information on this will be  posted after the presentation! Be sure to stop by to say hello to Rick  and Marc, and also to CMG lawyers Alan Feldstein and Mike DiMaggio who,  along with Rick and Marc, will be at the EXPO on both Friday and  Saturday meeting with the many supplement company principals who are CMG  clients.<span id="more-783"></span></p>
<p>We are thrilled to be a part of this year’s Arnold Classic – and are  looking forward to talking to those in the industry about the latest  news, trends and innovations in the health and fitness arena.  As we  gather with nearly 200,000 fitness enthusiasts and industry  professionals, we remain pleased to not only have a role in bringing  this event to the public, but to have continued to offer our legal  services and counsel to those in the industry throughout the years.  A  lot of exciting developments in the health/sports/fitness arena have  occurred over the past decade since we became involved annually with The  Arnold … and we remain proud to not only be affiliated with this  prestigious event, but to continue our role as a leader this industry.</p>
<p>Be sure to check back on our website and Facebook page for our  updates (and photos) from the 2012 Arnold Classic.  In addition, as  always, we’ll continue to bring you the latest information about issues  that affect you – both from this coming weekend at The Arnold, as well  as through our work as attorneys in the sports/health and  fitness/nutritional supplement practice areas.</p>
<p>For more information about the 2012 Arnold Sports Festival, visit: <a href="http://www.arnoldsportsfestival.com/home/sports-and-events/amateur-bodybuilding.html">www.arnoldsportsfestival.com/home/sports-and-events/amateur-bodybuilding.html</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~4/gOKCaIJ2_Yk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/continuing-our-leadership-role-in-the-sportsfitness-arena%e2%80%a6-as-we-head-to-the-arnold-classic-for-our-10th-year/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/continuing-our-leadership-role-in-the-sportsfitness-arena%e2%80%a6-as-we-head-to-the-arnold-classic-for-our-10th-year?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=continuing-our-leadership-role-in-the-sportsfitness-arena%25e2%2580%25a6-as-we-head-to-the-arnold-classic-for-our-10th-year</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA Rejects Senators’ Request To Withdraw NDI Draft Guidance! What’s Next For Industry … And What Can We Do?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~3/mGpWWCz_ksA/fda-rejects-senators%e2%80%99-request-to-withdraw-ndi-draft-guidance-what%e2%80%99s-next-for-industry-%e2%80%a6-and-what-can-we-do</link>
		<comments>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/fda-rejects-senators%e2%80%99-request-to-withdraw-ndi-draft-guidance-what%e2%80%99s-next-for-industry-%e2%80%a6-and-what-can-we-do#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dietary Supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSHEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDI Draft Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Harkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Hatch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/?p=778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, in a move that has shocked many in the supplement industry, the FDA rejected the request of Senators Orrin Hatch and Tom Harkin asking the FDA to immediately withdraw the New Dietary Ingredients (NDI) Draft Guidance.  This move was more than surprising to many in the industry – especially considering that the Senators [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/fda-registered.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-648" style="margin: 6px;" title="fda-registered" src="http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/fda-registered.gif" alt="" width="98" height="67" /></a>Last week, in a move that has shocked many in the supplement industry, the FDA rejected the request of Senators Orrin Hatch and Tom Harkin asking the FDA to immediately withdraw the New Dietary Ingredients (NDI) Draft Guidance.  This move was more than surprising to many in the industry – especially considering that the Senators were the authors of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA)!  According to the Senators, the current Draft Guidance “serves to undermine DSHEA in a number of important aspects&#8221; and did not meet their intent when they wrote the law. The Senators had requested an in-person meeting with the FDA back in December to discuss the issue in the hopes that FDA would withdraw the controversial Draft Guidance and replace it with a new one that was consistent with the law and their intent.</p>
<p>The meeting between FDA‘s Dr. Daniel Fabricant and Sens. Hatch and Harkin ended with the FDA, as noted by some in the industry, “sticking to its guns on its interpretation of what the NDI section of DSHEA means, regardless of what the senators say they meant when they wrote the law.”  Sens. Hatch and Harkin’s request to withdraw the controversial Draft Guidance, therefore, was denied – leaving many in the industry to wonder where we go from here.  The FDA clearly seems to be committed to moving forward and using the NDI Draft Guidance process to inch things ever closer to a system approximating premarket approval (which was never the intent and was specifically excluded by DSHEA).<span id="more-778"></span></p>
<p>What can we do now, as members of industry who are upset by the FDA’s lack of consideration of the many problems with the current NDI Draft Guidance and the agency’s refusal to listen to the advice of the two leading authors of the law that literally governs the supplement industry?  Many are hoping that writing a new amendment to DSHEA on the topic of NDI’s might be possible – although, considering FDA’s strong position, this looks like it may be something either not in the foreseeable future or a “last ditch effort.”</p>
<p>For now, we can – and should – continue to voice our opposition to this controversial NDI Draft Guidance.  Write a letter to your local congressional representatives noting your strong concerns as a member of the industry. Conveying a stand on this issue to your elected officials, rather than to agency bureaucrats, may eventually bring pressure for the withdrawal of the current Draft Guidance.</p>
<p>There may still be hope, as noted by Loren Israelsen of the United Natural Products Alliance in this week’s <em>New Hope</em><em> 360°</em> – who has said that he believes that “the issue will rise to a level of significance that both senior FDA and likely HHS officials will take a view on this.”</p>
<p>Let’s hope so – and let’s hope that they’ll listen to the facts, and the voices of reason, when it comes to considering withdrawing this draft guidance … before damage is done to the entire industry. In the meantime, many of our clients have begun re-evaluating their products and ingredients, turning to us for advice as to whether they are in line with FDA’s Draft Guidance. If FDA maintains their interpretation of DSHEA, the next step will be enforcement of that interpretation, which may or may not begin before a final Guidance Document is issued. Responsible dietary supplement companies should be prepared to face future FDA enforcement of their interpretation of DSHEA or the result could be costly.</p>
<p>For more coverage of last week’s meeting and a discussion of the issue as reported in <em>New Hope</em><em> 360°</em>, <a href="http://newhope360.com/regulation-and-legislation/fda-rejects-hatch-harkins-request-dump-ndi-guidance?cid=nl_360_daily">click <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">here.</span></strong></a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~4/mGpWWCz_ksA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/fda-rejects-senators%e2%80%99-request-to-withdraw-ndi-draft-guidance-what%e2%80%99s-next-for-industry-%e2%80%a6-and-what-can-we-do/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/fda-rejects-senators%e2%80%99-request-to-withdraw-ndi-draft-guidance-what%e2%80%99s-next-for-industry-%e2%80%a6-and-what-can-we-do?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=fda-rejects-senators%25e2%2580%2599-request-to-withdraw-ndi-draft-guidance-what%25e2%2580%2599s-next-for-industry-%25e2%2580%25a6-and-what-can-we-do</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Senators Urge FDA to Withdraw NDI Draft Guidance: Encouraging News for the Supplement Industry</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~3/1wAVIugFDaQ/senators-urge-fda-to-withdraw-ndi-draft-guidance-encouraging-news-for-the-supplement-industry</link>
		<comments>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/senators-urge-fda-to-withdraw-ndi-draft-guidance-encouraging-news-for-the-supplement-industry#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Collins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dietary Supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Herbal Products Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dietary supplement industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSHEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDI Draft Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDIs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch (R-UT)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Harkin (D-Iowa)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what may be considered highly encouraging and promising news for the supplement industry, Senators Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) have asked FDA Commissioner Dr. Margaret Hamburg to withdraw the controversial NDI Draft Guidance &#8212; and replace it with a new draft that, according to the Senators, &#8220;will provide needed clarification on what constitutes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 6px;" title="AHPA" src="http://ih.constantcontact.com/fs031/1101334774265/img/219.gif" alt="" width="251" height="66" />In what may be considered highly encouraging and promising news for the supplement industry, Senators Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) have asked FDA Commissioner Dr. Margaret Hamburg to withdraw the controversial NDI Draft Guidance &#8212; and replace it with a new draft that, according to the Senators, &#8220;will provide needed clarification on what constitutes an NDI, but does not undermine the balance Congress struck in DSHEA to provide consumers with access to safe, affordable dietary supplement products.&#8221;</p>
<p>As reported in yesterday&#8217;s <em>American Herbal Products Association Update</em>, Senators Hatch and Harkin &#8212; who were the principal authors of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) and are in a unique position to comment on this controversial new draft guidance and whether it is consistent with DSHEA &#8212; wrote a letter to the FDA to formally ask them to withdraw the document.  In their letter, the Senators pointed out that the draft guidance &#8220;serves to undermine DSHEA in a number of important aspects&#8221; &#8212; and went on to note their many concerns with the draft guidance (which many experts in the supplement industry have been noting since this controversial draft guidance for NDIs was introduced.) <span id="more-773"></span></p>
<p>With the support of these two powerful Senators, who are both long-time supporters of the natural health industry, there may be a glimmer of hope that this highly contested NDI draft guidance document may not be finalized in its current state, if at all.  According to reports, a meeting will take place in early January to discuss the issue &#8212; and the many concerns with this draft guidance &#8212; in more detail.</p>
<p>Although nothing is set in stone yet and it&#8217;s not clear what the final draft guidance will look like, this recent development is certainly welcome news for the supplement industry &#8212; and is an important step in helping to illustrate to the FDA that there is a tremendous opposition to this draft guidance.  We&#8217;ll keep you posted as to further developments after the parties convene sometime over the next few weeks &#8212; and hopefully will bring you word of a new, &#8220;improved&#8221;  policy concerning NDIs that is far more acceptable to everyone involved in the supplement industry.</p>
<p>To read the AHPA Update report, click <a href="http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=zpawkwbab&amp;v=001ZxTRMtTNNkgFrGYm1GDA0o5M77hutQ7mpKDB8W93z9gtilfxcqGRSJIFx3gAirLcQjM_J2P4UQrTIJIFTI8WbhyXsn0ntPDBOYGFd0I9PG10xvqf6NUgxa6E4ndHGccQi4xmcYWRI7BgrgjwexY2_Ulw85K_2OMhYhHSeOH38BbvkXCbKK8w28GGhg7dHC85-ecNWh5ooJ4%3D"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">here.</span></strong></a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~4/1wAVIugFDaQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/senators-urge-fda-to-withdraw-ndi-draft-guidance-encouraging-news-for-the-supplement-industry/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/senators-urge-fda-to-withdraw-ndi-draft-guidance-encouraging-news-for-the-supplement-industry?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=senators-urge-fda-to-withdraw-ndi-draft-guidance-encouraging-news-for-the-supplement-industry</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking News: Drums of Ephedrine Alkaloids seized by U.S. Marshals</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~3/4m-7qHWUhGk/breaking-news-drums-of-ephedrine-alkaloids-seized-by-u-s-marshals</link>
		<comments>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/breaking-news-drums-of-ephedrine-alkaloids-seized-by-u-s-marshals#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike DiMaggio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dietary Supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cassia angustifolia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cissus quadrangularis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Marshals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/?p=763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FDA issued a News Release yesterday stating that 4,000 pounds of raw material – Cissus quadrangularis and Cassia angustifolia extracts – found to contain “ephedrine alkaloids” were seized by U.S. Marshals. The allegation that these alkaloids were found in those raw materials is troubling and manufacturers should be on alert. Read the full News Release [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FDA issued a News Release yesterday stating that 4,000 pounds of raw material – Cissus quadrangularis and Cassia angustifolia extracts – found to contain “ephedrine alkaloids” were seized by U.S. Marshals. The allegation that these alkaloids were found in those raw materials is troubling and manufacturers should be on alert.</p>
<p>Read the full News Release below:<span id="more-763"></span></p>
<blockquote>
<h3>FDA NEWS RELEASE</h3>
<p><strong>Consumer Inquiries: </strong>888-INFO-FDA<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>FDA: U.S. Marshals seize products containing banned ephedrine for dietary supplements </strong><strong><br />
</strong><em>Potentially dangerous products banned for use in supplements in 2004 </em></p>
<p><strong>For Immediate Release: </strong>December 6, 2011<br />
<strong>Media Inquiries:</strong> Pat El-Hinnawy 301-796-4763, <a href="mailto:patricia.el-hinnawy@fda.hhs.gov">patricia.el-hinnawy@fda.hhs.gov</a></p>
<p>At the request of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Marshals today seized raw materials imported by Infinity Marketing Group, Inc. containing ephedrine alkaloids, a large family of pharmacological compounds called sympathomimetics banned by FDA since 2004 for use in dietary supplements.</p>
<p>The seizure took place in Rancho Dominguez, Calif. Through this action, FDA removed more than $70,000 worth of these potentially dangerous dietary supplement ingredients from the market.</p>
<p>Judge Gary A. Feess of the Central District of California issued a warrant for the seizure of more than 4,000 pounds of raw material – Cissus quadrangularis and Cassia angustifolia extracts – containing the ephedrine alkaloids.</p>
<p>&#8220;Working in close coordination with our federal colleagues in U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Drug Enforcement Administration, the FDA helped identify and remove these potentially dangerous products from the marketplace,” said Dara A. Corrigan, associate commissioner for regulatory affairs. “We will continue to take enforcement action that prevents potentially harmful products from reaching consumers and endangering their health.”</p>
<p>Ephedrine alkaloids are adrenaline-like stimulants that can have potentially dangerous effects on the heart. Prior to 2004, dietary supplements containing ephedrine alkaloids had been extensively promoted for aiding weight control and boosting sports performance and energy. But available data showed little evidence of the compound’s effectiveness except for modest, short-term weight loss without any clear health benefit, while confirming that the substance raised blood pressure and otherwise stressed the circulatory system. These effects were linked to significant adverse health outcomes, including heart attack, stroke and death.</p>
<p>FDA’s chemical analysis confirmed the presence of these alkaloids in the shipment, but the shipping drums carried no labels indicating that the material contained the banned ephedrine alkaloids.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm282537.htm">http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm282537.htm</a></p></blockquote>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~4/4m-7qHWUhGk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/breaking-news-drums-of-ephedrine-alkaloids-seized-by-u-s-marshals/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/breaking-news-drums-of-ephedrine-alkaloids-seized-by-u-s-marshals?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=breaking-news-drums-of-ephedrine-alkaloids-seized-by-u-s-marshals</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court Dismisses $1.8 Million Suit Against Supplement Company</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~3/tjibeFd-MAU/federal-court-dismisses-1-8-million-suit-against-supplement-company</link>
		<comments>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/federal-court-dismisses-1-8-million-suit-against-supplement-company#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Feldstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dietary Supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Nutrition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/?p=758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been several occasions when an athlete has tested positive for a substance banned by their governing body.  Sometimes it is because of false positive, a few times it is because of a less than scrupulous manufacturer spiking their product.  Most of the time though it is because the athlete does not take the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/inj3dex.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-759" title="inj3dex" src="http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/inj3dex.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="225" /></a>There have been several occasions when an athlete has tested positive for a substance banned by their governing body.  Sometimes it is because of false positive, a few times it is because of a less than scrupulous manufacturer spiking their product.  Most of the time though it is because the athlete does not take the time to find out whether or not an ingredient is prohibited.  Such was the case of Maryland-based track athelete Phillipe H. DeRosier, Jr.</p>
<p>DeRosier tested positive for a stimulant called DMAA that is contained in a popular nutritional supplement, Jack3d made by USPlabs.  DeRosier was banned from competition and sued USP Labs.  A federal judge dismissed his $1.8 million lawsuit.  The judge ruled that testimony supporting his claim was &#8221;wholly speculative and conclusory.&#8221;</p>
<p>One of the main reasons for the dismissal was that the ingredient is listed on the product label.  The product is being sold on the open market.  And while some ingredients are openly being sold, they may be banned by sanctioning bodies.  That is why it is important for any athlete consuming dietary supplement products to read the label and check to be sure that there is nothing in there that would be prohibited by their sanctioning body.</p>
<p>It is also good practice for companies who have ingredients in their product that may be banned by sanctioning bodies or that can result in false positives to put warnings on their labels that though the ingredient is appropriate it may be banned by not only athletic bodies, but by law enforcement agencies and other employers who regularly test their employees.  This can be a further risk management endeavor to eliminate the risk of costly defending oneself from a suit such as this.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~4/tjibeFd-MAU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/federal-court-dismisses-1-8-million-suit-against-supplement-company/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/federal-court-dismisses-1-8-million-suit-against-supplement-company?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=federal-court-dismisses-1-8-million-suit-against-supplement-company</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>New NDI “Grandfathering” Bill</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~3/iP9rpKw5v-o/new-ndi-%e2%80%9cgrandfathering%e2%80%9d-bill</link>
		<comments>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/new-ndi-%e2%80%9cgrandfathering%e2%80%9d-bill#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike DiMaggio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dietary Supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adverse Event Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cGMP’s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H R 3380 - Burton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDIs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/?p=744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Congress exempt Pre-Jan. 2007 Dietary Supplements from New Dietary Ingredient (NDI) Regulations? Although we don’t yet know whether this legislation has any legs, on November 4th Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.) proposed the H R 3380 &#8211; Burton, a bill that would grandfather tens of thousands of dietary supplement ingredients that have been marketed since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Will Congress exempt Pre-Jan. 2007 Dietary Supplements from New Dietary Ingredient (NDI) Regulations?</h3>
<div id="attachment_753" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 116px"><a href="http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/danburton.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-753" title="danburton" src="http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/danburton.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="156" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Rep. Dan Burton</p></div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Although we don’t yet know whether this legislation has any legs, on November 4<sup>th</sup> Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.) proposed the <a href="http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/H-R-3380-Burton.pdf">H R  3380 &#8211; Burton</a>, a bill that would grandfather tens of thousands of dietary supplement ingredients that have been marketed since the passage of DSHEA (October 15, 1994) up to January 1, 2007, effectively “reclassifying” their NDI status.  Recognizing that industry practices, including the cGMP’s, Adverse Event Reporting, and voluntary product auditing and testing for quality and purity, have improved dietary supplement safety for consumers, the bill highlights that fact that corresponding FDA policy remained unchanged. The bill seeks to amend section 413(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDC Act”) to expand the definition of a new dietary ingredient, because the FDC Act “does not recognize the current safe market in supplements, nor how intensively supplements have been regulated over the 17 years since enactment of DSHEA to protect public health and safety, and should be updated to reflect this reality.” We will be following the progress of this legislation in hopes that it will gain momentum and support from industry, and ultimately, from Congress.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~4/iP9rpKw5v-o" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/new-ndi-%e2%80%9cgrandfathering%e2%80%9d-bill/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/new-ndi-%e2%80%9cgrandfathering%e2%80%9d-bill?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=new-ndi-%25e2%2580%259cgrandfathering%25e2%2580%259d-bill</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Botanical Adulterants Program (BAP), Intended to Detect Adulteration of Herbal Supplements, part of Industry’s Efforts to Self-Regulate</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~3/L6e-5-elIjI/botanical-adulterants-program-bap-intended-to-detect-adulteration-of-herbal-supplements-part-of-industry%e2%80%99s-efforts-to-self-regulate</link>
		<comments>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/botanical-adulterants-program-bap-intended-to-detect-adulteration-of-herbal-supplements-part-of-industry%e2%80%99s-efforts-to-self-regulate#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Collins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dietary Supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Botanical Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Herbal Pharmacopoeia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Botanical Adulterants Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Council for Responsible Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Products Alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Natural Products Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Mississippi's National Center for Natural Products Researc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/?p=739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On November 2nd, the American Botanical Council (ABC), the American Herbal Pharmacopoeia (AHP), and the University of Mississippi&#8217;s National Center for Natural Products Research (NCNPR) announced a collaborative effort to address “adulteration of botanical ingredients” and educate members of the dietary supplement industry on accidental as well as intentional adulteration through the Botanical Adulterants Program [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/herbal-vitamins.jpeg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-741" style="margin: 10px;" title="Alternative Medicine" src="http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/herbal-vitamins.jpeg" alt="" width="134" height="102" /></a>On November 2nd, the American Botanical Council (ABC), the American Herbal Pharmacopoeia (AHP), and the University of Mississippi&#8217;s National Center for Natural Products Research (NCNPR) announced a collaborative effort to address “adulteration of botanical ingredients” and educate members of the dietary supplement industry on accidental as well as intentional adulteration through the Botanical Adulterants Program (BAP). The program has received support from many industry members, retailers and trade associations.<span id="more-739"></span></p>
<blockquote style="text-align: justify;"><p>According to their press release, “The ABC-AHP-NCNPR Botanical Adulterants Program aims to help protect consumers and responsible members of the herb and dietary supplement industry, as well as other manufacturers, by producing a series of detailed white papers, which will serve as an authoritative source of information on botanical adulterants with references to published official and unofficial analytical methods for companies and/or third-party laboratories to utilize to help detect the presence (or absence) of known adulterants.”</p>
<p>“In addition to the series of white papers, The Adulterants Program will include contributions and consultations from some of the leading independent third-party laboratories with experience in quality control and botanical identification issues. The editorial committee, which will advise on all technical publications, includes expert scientists from various universities, government agencies, and third-party analytical laboratories with extensive knowledge of herbal quality control. The Program is also being supported by several leading trade associations in the dietary supplement industry: the Council for Responsible Nutrition, the Natural Products Association, and the United Natural Products Alliance.”</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">While efforts toward industry “self-regulation” as opposed to “federal regulation” should be looked upon favorably by industry, the question that may be raised by Congress and FDA is why the quality control measures and identity testing required by the cGMP’s does not prevent this kind of adulteration of botanical ingredients. If accidental adulteration cannot be prevented by these mechanisms, it will be interesting to see what measures the BAP will suggest for manufacturers and retailers of products that contain botanical ingredients.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~4/L6e-5-elIjI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/botanical-adulterants-program-bap-intended-to-detect-adulteration-of-herbal-supplements-part-of-industry%e2%80%99s-efforts-to-self-regulate/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/botanical-adulterants-program-bap-intended-to-detect-adulteration-of-herbal-supplements-part-of-industry%e2%80%99s-efforts-to-self-regulate?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=botanical-adulterants-program-bap-intended-to-detect-adulteration-of-herbal-supplements-part-of-industry%25e2%2580%2599s-efforts-to-self-regulate</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Making the List …and Making a Point</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~3/DJYUeCwagK4/making-the-list-%e2%80%a6and-making-a-point</link>
		<comments>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/making-the-list-%e2%80%a6and-making-a-point#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Steroids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anabolic steroids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[livestrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Collins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/?p=735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just recently, CMG partner Rick Collins was named to a high profile list of the country’s “Most Controversial Health Figures” – coming in at  #8 (just below  Dr. Oz, but above celebrities like Richard Simmons, Jamie Oliver and Kim Kardashian – see the whole list here: http://www.livestrong.com/slideshow/546327-most-controversial-health-figures/?utm_source=newsletter&#38;utm_medium=email&#38;utm_campaign=111011#slide-18 ).  Rick is one of the country’s leading [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/RickCollins.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-143" style="margin: 10px;" title="Rick Collins" src="http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/RickCollins.jpg" alt="" width="140" height="200" /></a>Just recently, CMG partner Rick Collins was named to a high profile list of the country’s “Most Controversial Health Figures” – coming in at  #8 (just below  Dr. Oz, but above celebrities like Richard Simmons, Jamie Oliver and Kim Kardashian – see the whole list here: <a href="http://www.livestrong.com/slideshow/546327-most-controversial-health-figures/?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=111011#slide-18" target="_blank">http://www.livestrong.com/slideshow/546327-most-controversial-health-figures/?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=111011#slide-18</a> ).  Rick is one of the country’s leading legal experts when it comes to anabolic steroids and has recommended a more practical and sensible approach to controlling their use – one that balances preserving fairness in sports, protecting adolescents from drug abuse, and enhancing adult liberties regarding personal health.  Given that steroids continue to be one of the most heatedly controversial topics today, his inclusion on this list of controversial health figures is not surprising.</p>
<p>Unlike many of the others who “made the list” due to their involvement in conflicts of interest, questionable promotions/endorsements, and/or unfounded health claims, Rick’s inclusion on this list has nothing to do with any of that.  He made the list by simply “telling the truth” as he sees it and speaking out vocally (and rationally) on a highly controversial subject – proving the notion that “controversy sells” and bringing more attention to this timely topic.<span id="more-735"></span></p>
<p>In his definitive book on the topic and in numerous articles, Rick has cited medical and scientific experts who believe that the body of evidence condemning anabolic steroids as too dangerous to be administered to healthy adults is lacking and note that these drugs have been utilized in the medical context for many decades (key points made in the documentary film “Bigger, Stronger, Faster*”, in which Rick appeared, and in a ground-breaking exposé on HBO’s “Real Sports”).  However, as is all too common in media reports, the “Most Controversial Health Figures” list write-up oversimplifies Rick’s position on this complex subject. He doesn’t advocate “legalizing” these drugs by removing them from the supervision of physicians.  On the contrary, he advocates a more practical control of them, through physicians and within the doctor-patient relationship, to reduce the black market and keep steroids out of the hands of cheating athletes or misguided teenagers. In today’s society – where government seems to be trying to play a greater role in health care by calling for such measures as a government-mandated smoking ban in public parks and other food and beverage regulations/mandates (including the much debated “sin tax” on sodas and other similarly unhealthy beverages), there’s a fine line that exists between having our health “protected” by the government and protecting our mature adult freedoms.  Mature adults are legally permitted to make their own health decisions (even including poor ones) on smoking, drinking, diet choices, risky cosmetic surgery options, and high-risk sports activities, so why is physician-supervised administration of anabolic steroids a crime?  When it comes to adult personal health choices, whose decision is it really?</p>
<p>The controversy over anabolic steroids won’t settle down soon, but where there’s controversy, there’s conversation. It’s vital to keep the conversation going when it comes to how we can find the proper balance between protecting our health and protecting our freedoms.</p>
<p>The debate continues … and, at CMG, so does our overriding commitment to helping people protect their rights in the criminal defense context generally, and regarding anabolic steroid crimes in particular.  For more information about our groundbreaking work in this area, and to see just why Rick Collins was named to this high profile list of some of the most recognizable names in health care today, visit <a href="http://www.steroidlaw.com/">www.steroidlaw.com</a> and <a href="../../">www.supplementcounsel.com</a>.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/collinsmcdonaldgannsupplementcounsel/~4/DJYUeCwagK4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/making-the-list-%e2%80%a6and-making-a-point/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.supplementcounsel.com/blog/making-the-list-%e2%80%a6and-making-a-point?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=making-the-list-%25e2%2580%25a6and-making-a-point</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

