<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Complexity Digest</title>
	<atom:link href="https://comdig.cssociety.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org</link>
	<description>Networking the complexity community since 1999</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 19:40:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">115478355</site><cloud domain='comdig.cssociety.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="https://comdig.cssociety.org/osd.xml" title="Complexity Digest" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='https://comdig.cssociety.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
	<item>
		<title>Community First Theory: How Collective Organization Generates Individual Diversity</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/30/community-first-theory-how-collective-organization-generates-individual-diversity/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 19:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62576</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<div class="profile-card-drop" aria-expanded="false">
 Takashi Ikegami, <span class="inlineblock "><a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-4844" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"></a></span>Hiroki Kojima, <span class="inlineblock ">and </span>Akiko Kashiwagi
</div>
<div class="profile-card-drop" aria-expanded="false">
 <em>Entropy</em><span> </span><b>2026</b><span>, </span><em>28</em><span>(5), 523</span>
</div>
<div class="profile-card-drop" aria-expanded="false">
 <span>Collective systems often exhibit emergent behaviors that cannot be reduced to the properties of individual components. A central question is whether individuality itself is a precondition for collective organization, or whether it arises <span class="html-italic">from</span> it. Here we develop and empirically test <span class="html-italic">Community First Theory</span>, which proposes that collective organization is the generative substrate from which individual dynamical identity emerges. To operationalize this claim, we introduce non-trivial information closure (NTIC), which quantifies whether an individual’s temporal predictability is self-determined or distributed across collective relations. Using high-resolution tracking of complete <span class="html-italic">Tetrahymena</span> populations across four generations, we show that information closure emerges transiently in the middle phase of the cell cycle, flanked by strong collective coupling. Cells in the information-closed regime show significantly greater divergence from parental phenotypes, demonstrating that community organization actively generates behavioral diversity. These results provide initial empirical support for Community First Theory in a single-model system and suggest that NTIC offers a substrate-independent tool for locating agency transitions in collective systems.</span>
</div>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/28/5/523" rel="noopener">www.mdpi.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="profile-card-drop" aria-expanded="false">
 Takashi Ikegami, <span class="inlineblock "><a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-4844" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"></a></span>Hiroki Kojima, <span class="inlineblock ">and </span>Akiko Kashiwagi
</div>
<div class="profile-card-drop" aria-expanded="false">
 <em>Entropy</em><span> </span><b>2026</b><span>, </span><em>28</em><span>(5), 523</span>
</div>
<div class="profile-card-drop" aria-expanded="false">
 <span>Collective systems often exhibit emergent behaviors that cannot be reduced to the properties of individual components. A central question is whether individuality itself is a precondition for collective organization, or whether it arises <span class="html-italic">from</span> it. Here we develop and empirically test <span class="html-italic">Community First Theory</span>, which proposes that collective organization is the generative substrate from which individual dynamical identity emerges. To operationalize this claim, we introduce non-trivial information closure (NTIC), which quantifies whether an individual’s temporal predictability is self-determined or distributed across collective relations. Using high-resolution tracking of complete <span class="html-italic">Tetrahymena</span> populations across four generations, we show that information closure emerges transiently in the middle phase of the cell cycle, flanked by strong collective coupling. Cells in the information-closed regime show significantly greater divergence from parental phenotypes, demonstrating that community organization actively generates behavioral diversity. These results provide initial empirical support for Community First Theory in a single-model system and suggest that NTIC offers a substrate-independent tool for locating agency transitions in collective systems.</span>
</div>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/28/5/523" rel="noopener">www.mdpi.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62576</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Directionality-Induced Jamming in Multiplex Networks</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/29/directionality-induced-jamming-in-multiplex-networks/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 00:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Mateo Bouchet, Alejandro Tejedor, Xiangrong Wang, and Yamir Moreno</p>
<p><span>Phys. Rev. Lett. </span><b>136</b><span>, 207401</span></p>
<p><span>We study diffusion on multiplex networks with directed interlayer couplings. We demonstrate both numerically and analytically that even with undirected layers, interlayer directionality alone reproduces superdiffusion and the prime regime. We further reveal a new phenomenon, the directionality-induced jamming, whereby directed interlayer links hinder diffusion, fragmenting the system into dynamically disconnected components and preventing convergence to the steady state of the diffusion process. Via an optimization process, we show that this new regime is attainable in both toy models and real-world topologies. These findings underscore the crucial role of interlayer link directionality in shaping the emergent behavior of multiplex systems, with potential implications for the design and control of such systems.</span></p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/f1nb-vgms" rel="noopener">journals.aps.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mateo Bouchet, Alejandro Tejedor, Xiangrong Wang, and Yamir Moreno</p>
<p><span>Phys. Rev. Lett. </span><b>136</b><span>, 207401</span></p>
<p><span>We study diffusion on multiplex networks with directed interlayer couplings. We demonstrate both numerically and analytically that even with undirected layers, interlayer directionality alone reproduces superdiffusion and the prime regime. We further reveal a new phenomenon, the directionality-induced jamming, whereby directed interlayer links hinder diffusion, fragmenting the system into dynamically disconnected components and preventing convergence to the steady state of the diffusion process. Via an optimization process, we show that this new regime is attainable in both toy models and real-world topologies. These findings underscore the crucial role of interlayer link directionality in shaping the emergent behavior of multiplex systems, with potential implications for the design and control of such systems.</span></p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/f1nb-vgms" rel="noopener">journals.aps.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62574</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evolution of spatial structure, passing network patterns, and gameplay intensity in elite women’s and men’s football (2020–2025) &#124; Scientific Reports</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/29/evolution-of-spatial-structure-passing-network-patterns-and-gameplay-intensity-in-elite-womens-and-mens-football-2020-2025-scientific-reports/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 19:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62572</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Rebecca Carstens, Raj Deshpande, Pau Esteve, Nicoló Fidelibus, Sara Linde Neven, Ramona Ottow, Lokamruth K.R., Paula Rodríguez-Sánchez, Luca Santagata, Javier M. Buldú, Brennan Klein &#38; Maddalena Torricelli <br>Scientific Reports (2026)</p>
<p>Elite football is believed to have evolved in recent years, yet systematic evidence for the pace and form of that change remains sparse. Drawing on event-level records for 13,018 matches across ten top-tier men’s and women’s leagues in England, Spain, Germany, Italy, and the United States (2020–2025), we quantify match dynamics through two complementary lenses: conventional performance statistics and pitch-passing networks that track ball movement across spatial regions of the field. Between 2020 and 2025, average passing volume, pass accuracy, and the proportion of passes made under pressure all increased, with the largest year-on-year changes occurring in women’s competitions. Network measures reveal that normalized outreach decreased, indicating teams increasingly concentrate ball circulation into shorter-range passing connections rather than wide spatial distribution. These trends are consistent across countries and tiers, yet persistent national differences indicate that stylistic diversity remains. Notably, women’s competitions exhibit stronger rates of change across most metrics, consistent with an accelerating professionalization, while the systematic decline in network outreach across all competitions is consistent with a sport-wide shift toward shorter, more concentrated passing structures.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-52701-6" rel="noopener">www.nature.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebecca Carstens, Raj Deshpande, Pau Esteve, Nicoló Fidelibus, Sara Linde Neven, Ramona Ottow, Lokamruth K.R., Paula Rodríguez-Sánchez, Luca Santagata, Javier M. Buldú, Brennan Klein &amp; Maddalena Torricelli <br />Scientific Reports (2026)</p>
<p>Elite football is believed to have evolved in recent years, yet systematic evidence for the pace and form of that change remains sparse. Drawing on event-level records for 13,018 matches across ten top-tier men’s and women’s leagues in England, Spain, Germany, Italy, and the United States (2020–2025), we quantify match dynamics through two complementary lenses: conventional performance statistics and pitch-passing networks that track ball movement across spatial regions of the field. Between 2020 and 2025, average passing volume, pass accuracy, and the proportion of passes made under pressure all increased, with the largest year-on-year changes occurring in women’s competitions. Network measures reveal that normalized outreach decreased, indicating teams increasingly concentrate ball circulation into shorter-range passing connections rather than wide spatial distribution. These trends are consistent across countries and tiers, yet persistent national differences indicate that stylistic diversity remains. Notably, women’s competitions exhibit stronger rates of change across most metrics, consistent with an accelerating professionalization, while the systematic decline in network outreach across all competitions is consistent with a sport-wide shift toward shorter, more concentrated passing structures.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-52701-6" rel="noopener">www.nature.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62572</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facilitating credit is the most important function of Money: A role for Bitcoin?</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/29/facilitating-credit-is-the-most-important-function-of-money-a-role-for-bitcoin/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 18:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62569</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Klaus Jaffe</span></p>
<p><span>Money serves several roles: a medium of exchange to buy and sell without bartering; a unit of account to price goods consistently; a store of value to save purchasing power over time; a means to defer payment of future obligations like credit or loans. An agent based computer simulation program determine quantitatively the relative importance of these services. The main results showed that money for credit was by far the feature that achieved the largest overall production of wealth in the simulated societies. A conclusion from this study suggests that fomenting the use of internationally tradable currencies such as Bitcoin seems to be most promising pathway for international economic growth in the near future.</span></p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6724880" rel="noopener">papers.ssrn.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Klaus Jaffe</span></p>
<p><span>Money serves several roles: a medium of exchange to buy and sell without bartering; a unit of account to price goods consistently; a store of value to save purchasing power over time; a means to defer payment of future obligations like credit or loans. An agent based computer simulation program determine quantitatively the relative importance of these services. The main results showed that money for credit was by far the feature that achieved the largest overall production of wealth in the simulated societies. A conclusion from this study suggests that fomenting the use of internationally tradable currencies such as Bitcoin seems to be most promising pathway for international economic growth in the near future.</span></p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6724880" rel="noopener">papers.ssrn.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62569</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FORESIGHTERS Doctoral Programme</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/29/foresighters-doctoral-programme/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 18:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/29/foresighters-doctoral-programme/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Queen’s University Belfast is delighted to launch the recruitment process for 20 Early-Stage Researchers (ESRs) as part of its <em>Foresighters</em> Doctoral Training Programme. This offers an exceptional opportunity for future research leaders to access an innovative programme of doctoral training&#160;</strong><strong>at one of the UK’s leading universities </strong><strong>and engage in high impact, inter-disciplinary research with a wide range of non-academic partners.</strong></p>
<p><em>FORESIGHTERS</em><strong> </strong>(<em><u>F</u>uture&#160;<u>OR</u>i<u>E</u>nted&#160;<u>S</u>kills,&#160;<u>I</u>nnovation for&#160;<u>G</u>overnance for&#160;<u>H</u>ealth, <u>T</u>echnology, <u>E</u>neRgy,&#160;<u>citieS&#160;</u>and creativity) </em>offers unique opportunities to build a future research career that tackles complex societal problems. While researchers will be based in academic units across the university, from engineering, humanities, social science and the arts, they will be working within one of 5 interdisciplinary research themes (<strong><a href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/foresighters/project-overview/foresighters-research-themes/Health/">Health</a>, <a href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/foresighters/project-overview/foresighters-research-themes/Technology/">Technology</a>, <a href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/foresighters/project-overview/foresighters-research-themes/Energy/">Energy</a>, <a href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/foresighters/project-overview/foresighters-research-themes/FutureCities/">Future Cities</a></strong>, and <strong><a href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/foresighters/project-overview/foresighters-research-themes/Creativity/">Creativity</a></strong>). The cohort of researchers will be bound by a common perspective and training in <em>Futures Thinking</em> and <em>Futures Literacy </em>and will<em> </em>develop the skills and capabilities to understand, imagine, and critically use different ideas about the future to better understand key challenges. In addition to advanced training offered by the <a href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/graduate-school/">Thomas Moran Graduate School</a>, <em>FORESIGHTERS</em>&#160;ESRs will be trained in skills for anticipating change and using multiple possible futures to stimulate reflection, creativity, resilience and focus for contemporary action. The training programme also has a strong emphasis on the development of sustainable, diverse, and equitable research environments.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">More at: </span><a target="_blank" href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/foresighters/" rel="noopener">www.qub.ac.uk</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Queen’s University Belfast is delighted to launch the recruitment process for 20 Early-Stage Researchers (ESRs) as part of its <em>Foresighters</em> Doctoral Training Programme. This offers an exceptional opportunity for future research leaders to access an innovative programme of doctoral training&nbsp;</strong><strong>at one of the UK’s leading universities </strong><strong>and engage in high impact, inter-disciplinary research with a wide range of non-academic partners.</strong></p>
<p><em>FORESIGHTERS</em><strong> </strong>(<em><u>F</u>uture&nbsp;<u>OR</u>i<u>E</u>nted&nbsp;<u>S</u>kills,&nbsp;<u>I</u>nnovation for&nbsp;<u>G</u>overnance for&nbsp;<u>H</u>ealth, <u>T</u>echnology, <u>E</u>neRgy,&nbsp;<u>citieS&nbsp;</u>and creativity) </em>offers unique opportunities to build a future research career that tackles complex societal problems. While researchers will be based in academic units across the university, from engineering, humanities, social science and the arts, they will be working within one of 5 interdisciplinary research themes (<strong><a href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/foresighters/project-overview/foresighters-research-themes/Health/">Health</a>, <a href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/foresighters/project-overview/foresighters-research-themes/Technology/">Technology</a>, <a href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/foresighters/project-overview/foresighters-research-themes/Energy/">Energy</a>, <a href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/foresighters/project-overview/foresighters-research-themes/FutureCities/">Future Cities</a></strong>, and <strong><a href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/foresighters/project-overview/foresighters-research-themes/Creativity/">Creativity</a></strong>). The cohort of researchers will be bound by a common perspective and training in <em>Futures Thinking</em> and <em>Futures Literacy </em>and will<em> </em>develop the skills and capabilities to understand, imagine, and critically use different ideas about the future to better understand key challenges. In addition to advanced training offered by the <a href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/graduate-school/">Thomas Moran Graduate School</a>, <em>FORESIGHTERS</em>&nbsp;ESRs will be trained in skills for anticipating change and using multiple possible futures to stimulate reflection, creativity, resilience and focus for contemporary action. The training programme also has a strong emphasis on the development of sustainable, diverse, and equitable research environments.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000">More at: </span><a target="_blank" href="https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/foresighters/" rel="noopener">www.qub.ac.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62568</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thermodynamic efficiency of self-organisation in nonequilibrium steady states</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/16/thermodynamic-efficiency-of-self-organisation-in-nonequilibrium-steady-states/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 14:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Qianyang Chen, Mikhail Prokopenko</p>
<p>Active matter generates order or patterns through nonequilibrium dynamics. An open research challenge is to determine how efficiently a nonequilibrium self-organising system can convert consumed energy into macroscopic order. We study an information-theoretic quantity that directly addresses this challenge by estimating the entropy reduction induced by a small control-parameter perturbation, relative to the generalised work required for the perturbation. This quantity has previously been considered mainly in an equilibrium or near-equilibrium context, and here we extend this framework and apply it to two nonequilibrium self-organising systems: persistent and active Ising models. We observe that the thermodynamic efficiency of nonequilibrium systems maximises at phase transitions, as in equilibrium systems. Furthermore, we compare thermodynamic efficiency and inferential efficiency across control parameters. While these two quantities are equal in equilibrium as a consequence of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, we report that they diverge out of equilibrium, and the gap reflects how far the system is from equilibrium.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04508" rel="noopener">arxiv.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qianyang Chen, Mikhail Prokopenko</p>
<p>Active matter generates order or patterns through nonequilibrium dynamics. An open research challenge is to determine how efficiently a nonequilibrium self-organising system can convert consumed energy into macroscopic order. We study an information-theoretic quantity that directly addresses this challenge by estimating the entropy reduction induced by a small control-parameter perturbation, relative to the generalised work required for the perturbation. This quantity has previously been considered mainly in an equilibrium or near-equilibrium context, and here we extend this framework and apply it to two nonequilibrium self-organising systems: persistent and active Ising models. We observe that the thermodynamic efficiency of nonequilibrium systems maximises at phase transitions, as in equilibrium systems. Furthermore, we compare thermodynamic efficiency and inferential efficiency across control parameters. While these two quantities are equal in equilibrium as a consequence of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, we report that they diverge out of equilibrium, and the gap reflects how far the system is from equilibrium.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04508" rel="noopener">arxiv.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62541</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why AI Isn’t Going to Become Conscious &#124; Anil Seth</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/14/why-ai-isnt-going-to-become-conscious-anil-seth/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 14:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Talks]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/14/why-ai-isnt-going-to-become-conscious-anil-seth/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[
 [youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJV-vdbZ388?enablejsapi=1&#038;w=100&#038;h=350]
 loadYouTubePlayer('yt_video_tJV_vdbZ388_YW@vRaqRFE4wrv5p');

<p>We see consciousness in AI the same way we see faces in clouds, says neuroscientist Anil Seth. He explores the all-too-human tendency to project inner life onto machines that are brilliant mimics, not sentient beings, and gives a definitive answer to the urgent question: Will AI ever gain consciousness?</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Watch at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJV-vdbZ388" rel="noopener">www.youtube.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <div class="jetpack-video-wrapper"><iframe class="youtube-player" width="100" height="350" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tJV-vdbZ388?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;fs=1&#038;hl=en&#038;autohide=2&#038;wmode=transparent" allowfullscreen="true" style="border:0;" sandbox="allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox"></iframe></div><br />
 loadYouTubePlayer(&#8216;yt_video_tJV_vdbZ388_YW@vRaqRFE4wrv5p&#8217;);</p>
<p>We see consciousness in AI the same way we see faces in clouds, says neuroscientist Anil Seth. He explores the all-too-human tendency to project inner life onto machines that are brilliant mimics, not sentient beings, and gives a definitive answer to the urgent question: Will AI ever gain consciousness?</p>
<p></p>
<p>Watch at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJV-vdbZ388" rel="noopener">www.youtube.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62538</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Computational Economic Complexity Model for Regional Economic Integration: Analysis of the EU, MERCOSUR, URUPABOL, and the AndeanCommunity</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/13/a-computational-economic-complexity-model-for-regional-economic-integration-analysis-of-the-eu-mercosur-urupabol-and-the-andeancommunity/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 14:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62534</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>C. Marchuk, L. Ríos, A. González, S. González, G. Pereira and C. von Lücken, "A Computational Economic Complexity Model for Regional Economic Integration: Analysis of the EU, MERCOSUR, URUPABOL, and the AndeanCommunity," 2025 IEEE CHILEAN Conference on Electrical, Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Technologies (CHILECON), Valparaíso, Chile, 2025, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/CHILECON66915.2025.11476476.</p>
<p>Regional Economic Integration is a process by which countries seek mutual benefits through the reduction of trade, social, and political barriers. This paper introduces a computational mathematical model grounded in Economic Complexity Theory to analyze economic blocs as unified entities. Four case studies are examined: the European Union, MERCOSUR, URUPABOL, and the Andean Community. Using real export data and complexity metrics, we identify the combined productive capacities of member countries. Results reveal that integration enhances product diversity and increases the ubiquity of exports within the bloc. The study demonstrates that regional integration boosts development and strengthens competitiveness in the global economy. The proposed methodological approach provides a novel tool for regional analysis and serves as a foundation for future strategies in economic cooperation and productive planning. This research contributes to understanding how collective capabilities can generate synergies that exceed individual national potentials, particularly in the context of Latin American regional development.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11476476" rel="noopener">ieeexplore.ieee.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C. Marchuk, L. Ríos, A. González, S. González, G. Pereira and C. von Lücken, &#8220;A Computational Economic Complexity Model for Regional Economic Integration: Analysis of the EU, MERCOSUR, URUPABOL, and the AndeanCommunity,&#8221; 2025 IEEE CHILEAN Conference on Electrical, Electronics Engineering, Information and Communication Technologies (CHILECON), Valparaíso, Chile, 2025, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/CHILECON66915.2025.11476476.</p>
<p>Regional Economic Integration is a process by which countries seek mutual benefits through the reduction of trade, social, and political barriers. This paper introduces a computational mathematical model grounded in Economic Complexity Theory to analyze economic blocs as unified entities. Four case studies are examined: the European Union, MERCOSUR, URUPABOL, and the Andean Community. Using real export data and complexity metrics, we identify the combined productive capacities of member countries. Results reveal that integration enhances product diversity and increases the ubiquity of exports within the bloc. The study demonstrates that regional integration boosts development and strengthens competitiveness in the global economy. The proposed methodological approach provides a novel tool for regional analysis and serves as a foundation for future strategies in economic cooperation and productive planning. This research contributes to understanding how collective capabilities can generate synergies that exceed individual national potentials, particularly in the context of Latin American regional development.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11476476" rel="noopener">ieeexplore.ieee.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62534</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spark: modular spiking neural networks</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/11/spark-modular-spiking-neural-networks/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 14:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62531</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Mario Franco &#38; Carlos Gershenson <br>Front. Artif. Intell., Volume 9 - 2026</p>
<p>Nowadays, neural networks act as a synonym for artificial intelligence. Present neural network models, although remarkably powerful, are inefficient both in terms of data and energy. Several alternative forms of neural networks have been proposed to address some of these problems. Specifically, spiking neural networks are suitable for efficient hardware implementations. However, effective learning algorithms for spiking networks remain elusive, although it is suspected that effective plasticity mechanisms could alleviate the problem of data efficiency. Here, we present a new framework for spiking neural networks—Spark (https://github.com/Nogarx/Spark)—built upon the idea of modular design, from simple components to entire models. The aim of this framework is to provide an efficient and streamlined pipeline for spiking neural networks. We showcase this framework by solving the sparse-reward cartpole problem with simple plasticity mechanisms. We hope that a framework compatible with traditional ML pipelines may accelerate research in the area, specifically for continuous and unbatched learning, akin to the one animals exhibit</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/artificial-intelligence/articles/10.3389/frai.2026.1817837/full" rel="noopener">www.frontiersin.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mario Franco &amp; Carlos Gershenson <br />Front. Artif. Intell., Volume 9 &#8211; 2026</p>
<p>Nowadays, neural networks act as a synonym for artificial intelligence. Present neural network models, although remarkably powerful, are inefficient both in terms of data and energy. Several alternative forms of neural networks have been proposed to address some of these problems. Specifically, spiking neural networks are suitable for efficient hardware implementations. However, effective learning algorithms for spiking networks remain elusive, although it is suspected that effective plasticity mechanisms could alleviate the problem of data efficiency. Here, we present a new framework for spiking neural networks—Spark (<a href="https://github.com/Nogarx/Spark" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/Nogarx/Spark</a>)—built upon the idea of modular design, from simple components to entire models. The aim of this framework is to provide an efficient and streamlined pipeline for spiking neural networks. We showcase this framework by solving the sparse-reward cartpole problem with simple plasticity mechanisms. We hope that a framework compatible with traditional ML pipelines may accelerate research in the area, specifically for continuous and unbatched learning, akin to the one animals exhibit</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/artificial-intelligence/articles/10.3389/frai.2026.1817837/full" rel="noopener">www.frontiersin.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62531</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Complexity in Economic and Social Systems &#124; BSE Summer School, July 6–10, 2026</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/11/complexity-in-economic-and-social-systems-bse-summer-school-july-6-10-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 14:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/11/complexity-in-economic-and-social-systems-bse-summer-school-july-6-10-2026/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Summer School in Complexity and Emergence in Economic and Social Systems is inspired by the pioneering approach of the Santa Fe Institute. This program introduces participants to the tools and ideas central to the study of complex adaptive systems.</p>
<p>Through a combination of lectures, hands-on coding sessions, and interdisciplinary discussions, participants will explore how emergent phenomena—such as financial crises, innovation diffusion, urban growth, and collective decision-making—arise from decentralized interactions among agents.</p>
<p>Many of today’s most pressing social and economic challenges exhibit emergent properties that traditional equilibrium-based methods struggle to explain.</p>
<p>This Summer School addresses that gap by equipping participants with state-of-the-art tools from complexity science, enabling them to analyze systems where collective behavior and adaptation drive outcomes.</p>
<p>Enroll at: <a target="_blank" href="https://bse.eu/summer-school/complexity-and-emergence-in-economic-and-social-systems" rel="noopener">bse.eu</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Summer School in Complexity and Emergence in Economic and Social Systems is inspired by the pioneering approach of the Santa Fe Institute. This program introduces participants to the tools and ideas central to the study of complex adaptive systems.</p>
<p>Through a combination of lectures, hands-on coding sessions, and interdisciplinary discussions, participants will explore how emergent phenomena—such as financial crises, innovation diffusion, urban growth, and collective decision-making—arise from decentralized interactions among agents.</p>
<p>Many of today’s most pressing social and economic challenges exhibit emergent properties that traditional equilibrium-based methods struggle to explain.</p>
<p>This Summer School addresses that gap by equipping participants with state-of-the-art tools from complexity science, enabling them to analyze systems where collective behavior and adaptation drive outcomes.</p>
<p>Enroll at: <a target="_blank" href="https://bse.eu/summer-school/complexity-and-emergence-in-economic-and-social-systems" rel="noopener">bse.eu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62529</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emergence Is Not Engineering</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/03/emergence-is-not-engineering/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://cxdig.files.wordpress.com/2026/05/98e19e0a-88e2-4d9a-a7e9-4ffee598b633-1.jpg" class="aligncenter" style="width: 100%"></p>
<p>The universe creatively sets the rules for its own becoming.</p>
<p><em>Stuart Kauffman is a theoretical biologist and leading complexity scientist who has argued that the self-organization of organisms is as influential in evolution as natural selection. His seminal book on the subject is “The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Natural Selection in Evolution” (1993). He spoke recently with Noema Editor-in-Chief Nathan Gardels.</em></p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.noemamag.com/emergence-is-not-engineering" rel="noopener">www.noemamag.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://comdig.cssociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/98e19e0a-88e2-4d9a-a7e9-4ffee598b633-1.jpg?w=1108" class="aligncenter" style="width: 100%"></p>
<p>The universe creatively sets the rules for its own becoming.</p>
<p><em>Stuart Kauffman is a theoretical biologist and leading complexity scientist who has argued that the self-organization of organisms is as influential in evolution as natural selection. His seminal book on the subject is “The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Natural Selection in Evolution” (1993). He spoke recently with Noema Editor-in-Chief Nathan Gardels.</em></p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.noemamag.com/emergence-is-not-engineering" rel="noopener">www.noemamag.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62514</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://comdig.cssociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/98e19e0a-88e2-4d9a-a7e9-4ffee598b633-1.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multilayer network science: theory, methods, and applications</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/02/multilayer-network-science-theory-methods-and-applications-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 14:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62506</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://cxdig.files.wordpress.com/2026/05/2d6a09f8-b092-4c5a-8d9e-8e6299278d81-1.jpg" class="aligncenter" style="width: 100%"></p>
<div class="wi-authors at-ArticleAuthors">
 <div class="al-authors-list">
  <div class="meta-authors--limited">
   <div class="al-author-name js-flyout-wrap">
    <a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001893" aria-expanded="false">Alberto Aleta</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, &#160;</span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001894" aria-expanded="false">Andreia Sofia Teixeira</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001895" aria-expanded="false">Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001896" aria-expanded="false">Andrea Baronchelli</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001897" aria-expanded="false">Alain Barrat</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001898" aria-expanded="false">János Kertész</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001899" aria-expanded="false">Albert Díaz-Guilera</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001900" aria-expanded="false">Oriol Artime</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001901" aria-expanded="false">Michele Starnini</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001902" aria-expanded="false">Giovanni Petri</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001903" aria-expanded="false">Márton Karsai</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001904" aria-expanded="false">Siddharth Patwardhan</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001905" aria-expanded="false">Kathryn Coronges</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001906" aria-expanded="false">Ann McCranie</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001907" aria-expanded="false">Alessandro Vespignani</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001908" aria-expanded="false">Yamir Moreno</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001909" aria-expanded="false">Santo Fortunato</a>
   </div>
  </div>
 </div>
</div>
<div class="pub-history-wrap clearfix js-history-dropdown-wrap">
 <div class="pub-history-row clearfix">
  <div class="ww-citation-primary">
   <em>Journal of Complex Networks</em>, Volume 14, Issue 2, April 2026, cnag007,
  </div>
  <div class="ww-citation-primary"></div>
 </div>
</div>
<p>Multilayer network science has emerged as a central framework for analysing interconnected and interdependent complex systems. Its relevance has grown substantially with the increasing availability of rich, heterogeneous data, which makes it possible to uncover and exploit the inherently multilayered organisation of many real-world networks. In this review, we summarise recent developments in the field. On the theoretical and methodological front, we outline core concepts and survey advances in community detection, dynamical processes, temporal networks, higher-order interactions, and machine-learning-based approaches. On the application side, we discuss progress across diverse domains, including interdependent infrastructures, spreading dynamics, computational social science, economic and financial systems, ecological and climate networks, science-of-science studies, network medicine, and network neuroscience. We conclude with a forward-looking perspective, emphasizing the need for standardised datasets and software, deeper integration of temporal and higher-order structures, and a transition toward genuinely predictive models of complex systems.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://academic.oup.com/comnet/article-abstract/14/2/cnag007/8660433" rel="noopener">academic.oup.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://comdig.cssociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2d6a09f8-b092-4c5a-8d9e-8e6299278d81-1.jpg?w=1108" class="aligncenter" style="width: 100%"></p>
<div class="wi-authors at-ArticleAuthors">
<div class="al-authors-list">
<div class="meta-authors--limited">
<div class="al-author-name js-flyout-wrap">
    <a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001893" aria-expanded="false">Alberto Aleta</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, &nbsp;</span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001894" aria-expanded="false">Andreia Sofia Teixeira</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001895" aria-expanded="false">Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001896" aria-expanded="false">Andrea Baronchelli</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001897" aria-expanded="false">Alain Barrat</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001898" aria-expanded="false">János Kertész</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001899" aria-expanded="false">Albert Díaz-Guilera</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001900" aria-expanded="false">Oriol Artime</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001901" aria-expanded="false">Michele Starnini</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001902" aria-expanded="false">Giovanni Petri</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001903" aria-expanded="false">Márton Karsai</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001904" aria-expanded="false">Siddharth Patwardhan</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001905" aria-expanded="false">Kathryn Coronges</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001906" aria-expanded="false">Ann McCranie</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001907" aria-expanded="false">Alessandro Vespignani</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001908" aria-expanded="false">Yamir Moreno</a><span class="delimiter-margin-left">, </span><a class="linked-name js-linked-name-trigger btn-as-link" aria-controls="author-flyout-49001909" aria-expanded="false">Santo Fortunato</a>
   </div>
</p></div>
</p></div>
</div>
<div class="pub-history-wrap clearfix js-history-dropdown-wrap">
<div class="pub-history-row clearfix">
<div class="ww-citation-primary">
   <em>Journal of Complex Networks</em>, Volume 14, Issue 2, April 2026, cnag007,
  </div>
<div class="ww-citation-primary"></div>
</p></div>
</div>
<p>Multilayer network science has emerged as a central framework for analysing interconnected and interdependent complex systems. Its relevance has grown substantially with the increasing availability of rich, heterogeneous data, which makes it possible to uncover and exploit the inherently multilayered organisation of many real-world networks. In this review, we summarise recent developments in the field. On the theoretical and methodological front, we outline core concepts and survey advances in community detection, dynamical processes, temporal networks, higher-order interactions, and machine-learning-based approaches. On the application side, we discuss progress across diverse domains, including interdependent infrastructures, spreading dynamics, computational social science, economic and financial systems, ecological and climate networks, science-of-science studies, network medicine, and network neuroscience. We conclude with a forward-looking perspective, emphasizing the need for standardised datasets and software, deeper integration of temporal and higher-order structures, and a transition toward genuinely predictive models of complex systems.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://academic.oup.com/comnet/article-abstract/14/2/cnag007/8660433" rel="noopener">academic.oup.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62506</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://comdig.cssociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2d6a09f8-b092-4c5a-8d9e-8e6299278d81-1.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Complexity in the Twenty-First Century: From the Limits of Growth to the Growth of Limits</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/01/complexity-in-the-twenty-first-century-from-the-limits-of-growth-to-the-growth-of-limits/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 19:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62500</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Reda Benkirane</p>
<p>Complex Systems, 34(4), 2026 pp. 387–400.</p>
<p>Complexity, a term that is both ambiguous and multifaceted, is used widely today. Various legitimate definitions can be proposed for it, as is the case with “ample” notions such as intelligence, consciousness or culture. The recurrent mention of this term can be attributed to the transformation of our societies and their artifacts, as well as the acceleration of time brought by the digital revolution—a technological upheaval comparable to the invention of writing and the printing press.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.complex-systems.com/abstracts/v34_i04_a02/" rel="noopener">www.complex-systems.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reda Benkirane</p>
<p>Complex Systems, 34(4), 2026 pp. 387–400.</p>
<p>Complexity, a term that is both ambiguous and multifaceted, is used widely today. Various legitimate definitions can be proposed for it, as is the case with “ample” notions such as intelligence, consciousness or culture. The recurrent mention of this term can be attributed to the transformation of our societies and their artifacts, as well as the acceleration of time brought by the digital revolution—a technological upheaval comparable to the invention of writing and the printing press.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.complex-systems.com/abstracts/v34_i04_a02/" rel="noopener">www.complex-systems.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62500</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mapping foundational contributions in complex systems and network science</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/01/mapping-foundational-contributions-in-complex-systems-and-network-science/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 17:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/01/mapping-foundational-contributions-in-complex-systems-and-network-science/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This initiative aims to identify and structure the foundational contributions that define complex systems, network science, and related domains, across theory, methods, and applications. The goal is to build a coherent, field-wide reference that reflects how the discipline is actually used and understood across different subdomains.<br><br>In recent years, large-scale models and automated systems have made it possible to synthesize vast amounts of scientific information. However, identifying what is foundational — what truly shapes the conceptual and methodological backbone of a field — still requires distributed expert judgment. This effort is designed to complement algorithmic approaches by leveraging collective intelligence: many independent perspectives, aggregated into a structured view.<br><br>The objective is not to produce a simple ranking of famous papers, but to build a structured map of the field’s foundations, including works that may be missing from keyword-based or citation-based approaches.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://manliodedomenico.com/complexity_map.php" rel="noopener">manliodedomenico.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This initiative aims to identify and structure the foundational contributions that define complex systems, network science, and related domains, across theory, methods, and applications. The goal is to build a coherent, field-wide reference that reflects how the discipline is actually used and understood across different subdomains.</p>
<p>In recent years, large-scale models and automated systems have made it possible to synthesize vast amounts of scientific information. However, identifying what is foundational — what truly shapes the conceptual and methodological backbone of a field — still requires distributed expert judgment. This effort is designed to complement algorithmic approaches by leveraging collective intelligence: many independent perspectives, aggregated into a structured view.</p>
<p>The objective is not to produce a simple ranking of famous papers, but to build a structured map of the field’s foundations, including works that may be missing from keyword-based or citation-based approaches.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://manliodedomenico.com/complexity_map.php" rel="noopener">manliodedomenico.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62499</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Integrated information theory: the good, the bad and the misunderstood</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/01/integrated-information-theory-the-good-the-bad-and-the-misunderstood/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62497</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Adam B. Barrett, Borjan Milinkovic, Pedro A. M. Mediano, Fernando E. Rosas, Daniel Bor, Lionel Barnett, Anil K. Seth</p>
<p>The integrated information theory of consciousness (IIT) is uniquely ambitious in proposing a mathematical formula, derived from apparently fundamental properties of conscious experience, to describe the quantity and quality of consciousness for any physical system that possesses it. IIT has generated considerable debate, which has engendered some misunderstandings and misrepresentations. Here we address and hope to remedy this. We begin by concisely summarising the essentials of IIT. Given IIT is supposed to apply universally, we do this with reference to an arbitrary patch of matter, as opposed to the usual system of discrete computational units. Then, after briefly summarising IIT's theoretical and empirical achievements, we focus on five points which we consider especially important for driving forward new theory and increasing understanding. First, a high value of the measure Φ is not synonymous with `more consciousness'. We describe how Φ might be replaced with a suite of quantities to obtain a multi-dimensional characterisation of states of consciousness. Second, we describe with nuance the distinct flavour of panpsychism implied by IIT -- whereby space (and time) are tiled with substrates of (proto-) consciousness -- and find this is not problematic for the theory. Third, Φ is not well-defined for real physical systems, and has not been computed on any real physical system. Fourth, so far only proxies for IIT measures have been computed, and not approximations. Fifth, for IIT to fit with current successful theories in fundamental physics, a reformulation in terms of continuous fields would be needed.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11482" rel="noopener">arxiv.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam B. Barrett, Borjan Milinkovic, Pedro A. M. Mediano, Fernando E. Rosas, Daniel Bor, Lionel Barnett, Anil K. Seth</p>
<p>The integrated information theory of consciousness (IIT) is uniquely ambitious in proposing a mathematical formula, derived from apparently fundamental properties of conscious experience, to describe the quantity and quality of consciousness for any physical system that possesses it. IIT has generated considerable debate, which has engendered some misunderstandings and misrepresentations. Here we address and hope to remedy this. We begin by concisely summarising the essentials of IIT. Given IIT is supposed to apply universally, we do this with reference to an arbitrary patch of matter, as opposed to the usual system of discrete computational units. Then, after briefly summarising IIT&#8217;s theoretical and empirical achievements, we focus on five points which we consider especially important for driving forward new theory and increasing understanding. First, a high value of the measure Φ is not synonymous with `more consciousness&#8217;. We describe how Φ might be replaced with a suite of quantities to obtain a multi-dimensional characterisation of states of consciousness. Second, we describe with nuance the distinct flavour of panpsychism implied by IIT &#8212; whereby space (and time) are tiled with substrates of (proto-) consciousness &#8212; and find this is not problematic for the theory. Third, Φ is not well-defined for real physical systems, and has not been computed on any real physical system. Fourth, so far only proxies for IIT measures have been computed, and not approximations. Fifth, for IIT to fit with current successful theories in fundamental physics, a reformulation in terms of continuous fields would be needed.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11482" rel="noopener">arxiv.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62497</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deadline extended: CCS 2026: The 2026 Conference on Complex Systems @ Binghamton, NY, USA</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/01/deadline-extended-ccs-2026-the-2026-conference-on-complex-systems-binghamton-ny-usa/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 13:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/05/01/deadline-extended-ccs-2026-the-2026-conference-on-complex-systems-binghamton-ny-usa/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract submission deadline extended until May 15th!</p>
<p>More at: <a target="_blank" href="https://ccs26.cssociety.org/" rel="noopener">ccs26.cssociety.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abstract submission deadline extended until May 15th!</p>
<p>More at: <a target="_blank" href="https://ccs26.cssociety.org/" rel="noopener">ccs26.cssociety.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62495</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Informal connections outweigh coauthorship ties in academic impact</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/30/informal-connections-outweigh-coauthorship-ties-in-academic-impact/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62491</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lluís Danús, William Dinneen, Carolina Torreblanca, Guy Grossman, and Sandra González-Bailón</p>
<p>PNAS 123 (18) e2511050123</p>
<p>The term “invisible college” refers to communication networks that help scientists exchange information and advance knowledge. These networks create social capital, granting access to resources like new ideas and support. Measuring those intangible exchanges is an empirical challenge. Here we approximate these ties through the analysis of the “thank you” notes appended to journal articles. Our findings show that scholars disconnected from this layer of academic social capital have lower publication impact. We also show that informal ties provide support not captured by coauthorship ties, which reflect a more rigid form of collaboration. Documenting how informal structures of support operate can help leverage collective resources in the pursuit of shared intellectual goals.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2511050123" rel="noopener">www.pnas.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lluís Danús, William Dinneen, Carolina Torreblanca, Guy Grossman, and Sandra González-Bailón</p>
<p>PNAS 123 (18) e2511050123</p>
<p>The term “invisible college” refers to communication networks that help scientists exchange information and advance knowledge. These networks create social capital, granting access to resources like new ideas and support. Measuring those intangible exchanges is an empirical challenge. Here we approximate these ties through the analysis of the “thank you” notes appended to journal articles. Our findings show that scholars disconnected from this layer of academic social capital have lower publication impact. We also show that informal ties provide support not captured by coauthorship ties, which reflect a more rigid form of collaboration. Documenting how informal structures of support operate can help leverage collective resources in the pursuit of shared intellectual goals.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2511050123" rel="noopener">www.pnas.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62491</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anna Guerrero &#124; How to Model Science as a Complex System</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/30/anna-guerrero-how-to-model-science-as-a-complex-system/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Talks]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/30/anna-guerrero-how-to-model-science-as-a-complex-system/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Tracing the historical dynamics of science can reveal how scientific knowledge emerges and evolves over time. Because scientific knowledge is embedded in increasingly complex systems, comprising shifting relationships among people, the organisms and matter they study, technology, data, publications, and the concepts they utilize, scholars are looking beyond traditional historiographical methods towards quantitative and computational tools. Big data, network analysis, and machine learning enhance the scale and speed of analysis, but these methods often ignore or erase the critical roles that context (like time period, geography, and discipline) and different types of data (like image and audio data) play in the development of new knowledge. In this talk, I present context- and data-sensitive computational methods that extend efforts to model the evolution of science as a complex system. These methods reveal when new knowledge emerges and how the features of old scientific information constrain features of new scientific knowledge.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.mivideo.it.umich.edu/playlist/dedicated/293581272/1_gz6diy1y/1_x3ig2lst" rel="noopener">www.mivideo.it.umich.edu</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tracing the historical dynamics of science can reveal how scientific knowledge emerges and evolves over time. Because scientific knowledge is embedded in increasingly complex systems, comprising shifting relationships among people, the organisms and matter they study, technology, data, publications, and the concepts they utilize, scholars are looking beyond traditional historiographical methods towards quantitative and computational tools. Big data, network analysis, and machine learning enhance the scale and speed of analysis, but these methods often ignore or erase the critical roles that context (like time period, geography, and discipline) and different types of data (like image and audio data) play in the development of new knowledge. In this talk, I present context- and data-sensitive computational methods that extend efforts to model the evolution of science as a complex system. These methods reveal when new knowledge emerges and how the features of old scientific information constrain features of new scientific knowledge.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.mivideo.it.umich.edu/playlist/dedicated/293581272/1_gz6diy1y/1_x3ig2lst" rel="noopener">www.mivideo.it.umich.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62490</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exploring Cultural Evolution Through Modular Dynamics in Temporal Hashtag Networks</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/29/exploring-cultural-evolution-through-modular-dynamics-in-temporal-hashtag-networks/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 18:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62486</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Yasuhiro Hashimoto, Hiroki Sato, and Takashi Ikegami</p>
<p>Entropy 2026, 28(4), 398</p>
<p><br>Social media platforms offer unprecedented opportunities to study cultural evolution by analyzing digital traces. This study presents a methodological framework for analyzing the temporal dynamics of cultural modules in hashtag co-occurrence networks. We address the inherent challenges of analyzing dense, skewed, and highly variable cultural networks by introducing a perturbation ensemble clustering approach that distinguishes stable from unstable structural elements. By applying the Leiden algorithm to a perturbed ensemble of hashtag networks, we identify robust core modules and their stable periphery, and distinguish them from floating elements with unstable associations. Analysis of four years of data from a major photo-sharing platform reveals complex patterns in the evolution of cultural modules, including both stable associations and dynamic reorganizations. Our findings demonstrate how ensemble clustering techniques can effectively capture the interplay between stability and change in evolving cultural systems.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/28/4/398" rel="noopener">www.mdpi.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yasuhiro Hashimoto, Hiroki Sato, and Takashi Ikegami</p>
<p>Entropy 2026, 28(4), 398</p>
<p>Social media platforms offer unprecedented opportunities to study cultural evolution by analyzing digital traces. This study presents a methodological framework for analyzing the temporal dynamics of cultural modules in hashtag co-occurrence networks. We address the inherent challenges of analyzing dense, skewed, and highly variable cultural networks by introducing a perturbation ensemble clustering approach that distinguishes stable from unstable structural elements. By applying the Leiden algorithm to a perturbed ensemble of hashtag networks, we identify robust core modules and their stable periphery, and distinguish them from floating elements with unstable associations. Analysis of four years of data from a major photo-sharing platform reveals complex patterns in the evolution of cultural modules, including both stable associations and dynamic reorganizations. Our findings demonstrate how ensemble clustering techniques can effectively capture the interplay between stability and change in evolving cultural systems.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/28/4/398" rel="noopener">www.mdpi.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62486</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking the code: Multi-level learning in the Eurovision Song Contest</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/29/breaking-the-code-multi-level-learning-in-the-eurovision-song-contest-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62484</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Luis A. Nunes Amaral; Arthur Capozzi; Dirk Helbing <br>R Soc Open Sci. (2026) 13 (4): 251727 .</p>
<p>Organizations learn from market, political and societal responses to their actions. While in some cases both the actions and responses take place in an open manner, in many others, some aspects may be hidden from external observers. The Eurovision Song Contest offers a mostly open-data case in which to study organizational level learning at the levels of organizers and participants. We present here evidence for changes in the rules of the Contest in response to undesired outcomes such as runaway winners. We also find strong evidence of participant learning in the characteristics of competing songs over the 70 years of the Contest. English has been adopted as the lingua franca of the competing songs and pop has become the standard genre. The number of words of lyrics has also grown in response to this collective learning. Remarkably, we find evidence that France, Italy, Portugal and Spain have chosen to ignore the ‘lesson’ that English lyrics increase winning probability, consistent with utility functions that award greater value to featuring national culture than to winning the Contest. These countries—but not Germany—appear to be less susceptible to Anglo-Saxon cultural influence than their peers, a resistance that may extend beyond cultural matters.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article/13/4/251727/481541/Breaking-the-code-Multi-level-learning-in-the" rel="noopener">royalsocietypublishing.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luis A. Nunes Amaral; Arthur Capozzi; Dirk Helbing <br />R Soc Open Sci. (2026) 13 (4): 251727 .</p>
<p>Organizations learn from market, political and societal responses to their actions. While in some cases both the actions and responses take place in an open manner, in many others, some aspects may be hidden from external observers. The Eurovision Song Contest offers a mostly open-data case in which to study organizational level learning at the levels of organizers and participants. We present here evidence for changes in the rules of the Contest in response to undesired outcomes such as runaway winners. We also find strong evidence of participant learning in the characteristics of competing songs over the 70 years of the Contest. English has been adopted as the lingua franca of the competing songs and pop has become the standard genre. The number of words of lyrics has also grown in response to this collective learning. Remarkably, we find evidence that France, Italy, Portugal and Spain have chosen to ignore the ‘lesson’ that English lyrics increase winning probability, consistent with utility functions that award greater value to featuring national culture than to winning the Contest. These countries—but not Germany—appear to be less susceptible to Anglo-Saxon cultural influence than their peers, a resistance that may extend beyond cultural matters.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsos/article/13/4/251727/481541/Breaking-the-code-Multi-level-learning-in-the" rel="noopener">royalsocietypublishing.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62484</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Probabilistic punishment proportional to the payoff difference solves the problem of antisocial punishment</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/29/probabilistic-punishment-proportional-to-the-payoff-difference-solves-the-problem-of-antisocial-punishment/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62481</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Tetsushi Ohdaira</p>
<p>Chaos, Solitons &#38; Fractals<br>Volume 208, Part 4, July 2026, 118382</p>
<p>This study modifies the model in the previous studies and considers three types of inter-individual relationships: regular, random, and scale-free ring lattices. Furthermore, we introduce defectors, who do not contribute to the public goods; cooperators, who contribute to the public goods; and loners, who do not participate in the public goods framework. We assume that each of these three types of individuals punishes other individuals with a probability proportional to the difference between their own payoff and their opponent's average payoff including them. Using this modified pool punishment model, this study shows the following. Firstly, the damage to the average payoff due to excessive punishment is kept significantly low. Secondly, antisocial punishment is not evolutionarily advantageous, and cooperators always become advantageous. Finally, the final average payoff is always higher than that of pool punishment in existing studies and roughly comparable to that of peer punishment in existing studies. The results of this study provide new insights that the claim of the existing study is not always correct; that is, even if antisocial punishment is possible, it does not have an evolutionary advantage, and cooperators always become advantageous, which in turn solves the problem of antisocial punishment. This study is being conducted as part of efforts to improve specialized education at Kanagawa Institute of Technology.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960077926005230" rel="noopener">www.sciencedirect.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tetsushi Ohdaira</p>
<p>Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals<br />Volume 208, Part 4, July 2026, 118382</p>
<p>This study modifies the model in the previous studies and considers three types of inter-individual relationships: regular, random, and scale-free ring lattices. Furthermore, we introduce defectors, who do not contribute to the public goods; cooperators, who contribute to the public goods; and loners, who do not participate in the public goods framework. We assume that each of these three types of individuals punishes other individuals with a probability proportional to the difference between their own payoff and their opponent&#8217;s average payoff including them. Using this modified pool punishment model, this study shows the following. Firstly, the damage to the average payoff due to excessive punishment is kept significantly low. Secondly, antisocial punishment is not evolutionarily advantageous, and cooperators always become advantageous. Finally, the final average payoff is always higher than that of pool punishment in existing studies and roughly comparable to that of peer punishment in existing studies. The results of this study provide new insights that the claim of the existing study is not always correct; that is, even if antisocial punishment is possible, it does not have an evolutionary advantage, and cooperators always become advantageous, which in turn solves the problem of antisocial punishment. This study is being conducted as part of efforts to improve specialized education at Kanagawa Institute of Technology.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960077926005230" rel="noopener">www.sciencedirect.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62481</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tipping Out of Trouble: How Societies Transformed and How We Can Do So Again, by Marten Scheffer</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/29/tipping-out-of-trouble-how-societies-transformed-and-how-we-can-do-so-again-by-marten-scheffer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/29/tipping-out-of-trouble-how-societies-transformed-and-how-we-can-do-so-again-by-marten-scheffer/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://cxdig.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/507c89a8-838a-47fc-95bb-ac999ef5741c-1.jpg" class="alignleft" style="width: 50%"></p>
<p>What kind of trouble lies ahead? How can we successfully transition towards a sustainable future? Drawing on a remarkably broad range of insights from complex systems and the functioning of the brain to the history of civilizations and the workings of modern societies, the distinguished scientist Marten Scheffer addresses these key questions of our times. He looks to the past to show how societies have tipped out of trouble before, the mechanisms that drive social transformations and the invisible hands holding us back. He traces how long-standing practices such as the slave trade and foot-binding were suddenly abandoned and how entire civilizations have collapsed to make way for something new. Could we be heading for a similarly dramatic change? Marten Scheffer argues that a dark future is plausible but not yet inevitable and he provides us instead with a hopeful roadmap to steer ourselves away from collapse-and toward renewal.</p>
<p>More at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/tipping-out-of-trouble/6F97E916EC54055BD22BB237FA5FFF87" rel="noopener">www.cambridge.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://comdig.cssociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/507c89a8-838a-47fc-95bb-ac999ef5741c-1.jpg" class="alignleft" style="width: 50%"></p>
<p>What kind of trouble lies ahead? How can we successfully transition towards a sustainable future? Drawing on a remarkably broad range of insights from complex systems and the functioning of the brain to the history of civilizations and the workings of modern societies, the distinguished scientist Marten Scheffer addresses these key questions of our times. He looks to the past to show how societies have tipped out of trouble before, the mechanisms that drive social transformations and the invisible hands holding us back. He traces how long-standing practices such as the slave trade and foot-binding were suddenly abandoned and how entire civilizations have collapsed to make way for something new. Could we be heading for a similarly dramatic change? Marten Scheffer argues that a dark future is plausible but not yet inevitable and he provides us instead with a hopeful roadmap to steer ourselves away from collapse-and toward renewal.</p>
<p>More at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/tipping-out-of-trouble/6F97E916EC54055BD22BB237FA5FFF87" rel="noopener">www.cambridge.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62480</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://comdig.cssociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/507c89a8-838a-47fc-95bb-ac999ef5741c-1.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wildlife trade drives animal-to-human pathogen transmission over 40 years</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/11/wildlife-trade-drives-animal-to-human-pathogen-transmission-over-40-years/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 15:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62456</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>JÉRÔME M. W. GIPPET, COLIN J. CARLSON, TRISTAN KLAFTENBERGER, MATTÉO SCHWEIZER, EVAN A. ESKEW, MEREDITH L. GORE, AND CLEO BERTELSMEIER</p>
<p>SCIENCE 9 Apr 2026 Vol 392, Issue 6794 pp. 178-182</p>
<p>The wildlife trade affects a quarter of terrestrial vertebrates and creates opportunities for cross-species pathogen transmission, but its precise role in shaping animal-human pathogen exchange remains unclear. In our analysis of 40 years of global wildlife trade data, we show that traded mammals are 1.5-fold as likely to share pathogens with humans as nontraded mammals, and that illegal and live-animal trade further exacerbate pathogen sharing. Time spent in trade predicts the number of zoonotic pathogens that a wildlife species hosts. On average, a species shares an additional pathogen with humans for every 10 years it is traded.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adw5518" rel="noopener">www.science.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JÉRÔME M. W. GIPPET, COLIN J. CARLSON, TRISTAN KLAFTENBERGER, MATTÉO SCHWEIZER, EVAN A. ESKEW, MEREDITH L. GORE, AND CLEO BERTELSMEIER</p>
<p>SCIENCE 9 Apr 2026 Vol 392, Issue 6794 pp. 178-182</p>
<p>The wildlife trade affects a quarter of terrestrial vertebrates and creates opportunities for cross-species pathogen transmission, but its precise role in shaping animal-human pathogen exchange remains unclear. In our analysis of 40 years of global wildlife trade data, we show that traded mammals are 1.5-fold as likely to share pathogens with humans as nontraded mammals, and that illegal and live-animal trade further exacerbate pathogen sharing. Time spent in trade predicts the number of zoonotic pathogens that a wildlife species hosts. On average, a species shares an additional pathogen with humans for every 10 years it is traded.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adw5518" rel="noopener">www.science.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62456</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Importance Sampling and Multilinear Extensions for Approximating Shapley Values with Applications to Explainable Artificial Intelligence</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/07/on-importance-sampling-and-multilinear-extensions-for-approximating-shapley-values-with-applications-to-explainable-artificial-intelligence/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 20:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62448</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Tim Pollmann and Jochen Staudacher</p>
<p>Complexities 2026, 2(1), 7</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Shapley values are the most widely used point-valued solution concept for cooperative games and have recently garnered attention for their applicability in explainable machine learning. Due to the complexity of Shapley value computation, users mostly resort to Monte Carlo approximations for large problems. We take a detailed look at an approximation method grounded in multilinear extensions proposed in 2021 under the name “Owen sampling”. We point out why Owen sampling is biased and propose unbiased alternatives based on combining multilinear extensions with stratified sampling and importance sampling. Finally, we discuss empirical results of the presented algorithms for various cooperative games, including real-world explainability scenarios.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6448/2/1/7" rel="noopener">www.mdpi.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Pollmann and Jochen Staudacher</p>
<p>Complexities 2026, 2(1), 7</p>
<p></p>
<p>Shapley values are the most widely used point-valued solution concept for cooperative games and have recently garnered attention for their applicability in explainable machine learning. Due to the complexity of Shapley value computation, users mostly resort to Monte Carlo approximations for large problems. We take a detailed look at an approximation method grounded in multilinear extensions proposed in 2021 under the name “Owen sampling”. We point out why Owen sampling is biased and propose unbiased alternatives based on combining multilinear extensions with stratified sampling and importance sampling. Finally, we discuss empirical results of the presented algorithms for various cooperative games, including real-world explainability scenarios.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.mdpi.com/3042-6448/2/1/7" rel="noopener">www.mdpi.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62448</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Human mobility in the metaverse mirrors patterns in the physical world</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/07/human-mobility-in-the-metaverse-mirrors-patterns-in-the-physical-world/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 16:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Kishore Vasan, Márton Karsai &#38; Albert-László Barabási <br>Scientific Reports</p>
<p>The metaverse is a virtual space enabling interactions beyond geographical boundaries, promising to transform how people engage with each other both in the digital and the physical worlds. The lack of geographical boundaries and travel costs in the metaverse prompts us to ask if the fundamental laws that govern human mobility in the physical world apply. We collected data on avatar movements from Decentraland, along with their network mobility extracted from NFT purchases on Ethereum and Polygon. We find that despite the absence of mobility costs, an individual’s inclination to visit new locations diminishes over time, limiting movement to a small fraction of the metaverse. We also find a lack of correlation between land prices and visitation, a deviation from the patterns characterizing the physical world. Finally, we identify the scaling laws that characterize meta mobility and show that we need to add preferential selection to the existing models to explain quantitative patterns of metaverse mobility. Our ability to predict the characteristics of the emerging meta mobility network implies that the laws governing human mobility are rooted in fundamental patterns of human dynamics, rather than the nature of space and cost of movement.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-45128-6" rel="noopener">www.nature.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kishore Vasan, Márton Karsai &amp; Albert-László Barabási <br />Scientific Reports</p>
<p>The metaverse is a virtual space enabling interactions beyond geographical boundaries, promising to transform how people engage with each other both in the digital and the physical worlds. The lack of geographical boundaries and travel costs in the metaverse prompts us to ask if the fundamental laws that govern human mobility in the physical world apply. We collected data on avatar movements from Decentraland, along with their network mobility extracted from NFT purchases on Ethereum and Polygon. We find that despite the absence of mobility costs, an individual’s inclination to visit new locations diminishes over time, limiting movement to a small fraction of the metaverse. We also find a lack of correlation between land prices and visitation, a deviation from the patterns characterizing the physical world. Finally, we identify the scaling laws that characterize meta mobility and show that we need to add preferential selection to the existing models to explain quantitative patterns of metaverse mobility. Our ability to predict the characteristics of the emerging meta mobility network implies that the laws governing human mobility are rooted in fundamental patterns of human dynamics, rather than the nature of space and cost of movement.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-45128-6" rel="noopener">www.nature.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62446</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twelfth International Conference on Guided Self-Organization (GSO-2026)</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/06/twelfth-international-conference-on-guided-self-organization-gso-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 21:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/06/twelfth-international-conference-on-guided-self-organization-gso-2026/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>​"Information Processing in Complex Systems"</strong></p>
<p>The 12th International Conference on Guided Self-Organization takes place during <strong>October 14-15, 2026 in Binghamton, NY</strong> (USA), during&#160;The 2026 Conference on Complex Systems (CCS 2026)&#160;. GSO-2026 is organized by The State University of New York at Binghamton&#160;and&#160;The International Association for Guided Self-Organization (TIA-GSO).<br><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Research Aims and Topics</strong></p>
<p>GSO&#160;"aims to regulate self-organization for specific purposes, so that a dynamical system may reach specific attractors or outcomes. The regulation constrains a self-organizing process within a complex system by restricting local interactions between the system components, rather than following an explicit control mechanism or a global design blueprint."&#160;<br><br>Information processing in complex self-organizing systems involves the storage, transfer, and modification of information through the interactions of components within the system. Unlike traditional computers, which process digital information in a centralized manner, complex systems like biological organisms or social networks process information in decentralized, distributed, and often analog ways. The study of information processing in complex systems seeks to define a set of universal properties that can describe the dynamics of diverse systems, from brain networks to financial markets, using a common language. Understanding information processing in complex systems is fundamental to designing self-organizing systems, engineering collective behavior and developing energetically efficient models of computation. Modern approaches use frameworks from fields such as information theory, dynamical systems, and machine learning to model how systems ranging from economies to ant colonies process information.<br><br>The&#160;GSO-2026 conference will bring together invited experts and researchers in unconventional computation, swarm intelligence, open-ended evolution, and complex adaptive systems. Special topics of interest include: synthetic and systems biology, agent-based modeling, evolutionary and adaptive computation, socio- and bio-inspired algorithms, swarm robotics, physics of self-organizing behavior, information-driven self-organization, and self-organizing cyber-physical systems.</p>
<p>More at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.guided-self.org/gso-2026.html" rel="noopener">www.guided-self.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>​&#8221;Information Processing in Complex Systems&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>The 12th International Conference on Guided Self-Organization takes place during <strong>October 14-15, 2026 in Binghamton, NY</strong> (USA), during&nbsp;The 2026 Conference on Complex Systems (CCS 2026)&nbsp;. GSO-2026 is organized by The State University of New York at Binghamton&nbsp;and&nbsp;The International Association for Guided Self-Organization (TIA-GSO).<br /><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Research Aims and Topics</strong></p>
<p>GSO&nbsp;&#8220;aims to regulate self-organization for specific purposes, so that a dynamical system may reach specific attractors or outcomes. The regulation constrains a self-organizing process within a complex system by restricting local interactions between the system components, rather than following an explicit control mechanism or a global design blueprint.&#8221;&nbsp;</p>
<p>Information processing in complex self-organizing systems involves the storage, transfer, and modification of information through the interactions of components within the system. Unlike traditional computers, which process digital information in a centralized manner, complex systems like biological organisms or social networks process information in decentralized, distributed, and often analog ways. The study of information processing in complex systems seeks to define a set of universal properties that can describe the dynamics of diverse systems, from brain networks to financial markets, using a common language. Understanding information processing in complex systems is fundamental to designing self-organizing systems, engineering collective behavior and developing energetically efficient models of computation. Modern approaches use frameworks from fields such as information theory, dynamical systems, and machine learning to model how systems ranging from economies to ant colonies process information.</p>
<p>The&nbsp;GSO-2026 conference will bring together invited experts and researchers in unconventional computation, swarm intelligence, open-ended evolution, and complex adaptive systems. Special topics of interest include: synthetic and systems biology, agent-based modeling, evolutionary and adaptive computation, socio- and bio-inspired algorithms, swarm robotics, physics of self-organizing behavior, information-driven self-organization, and self-organizing cyber-physical systems.</p>
<p>More at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.guided-self.org/gso-2026.html" rel="noopener">www.guided-self.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62442</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Call for Abstracts: CCS 2026: The 2026 Conference on Complex Systems @ Binghamton, NY, USA</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/06/call-for-abstracts-ccs-2026-the-2026-conference-on-complex-systems-binghamton-ny-usa/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 19:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/06/call-for-abstracts-ccs-2026-the-2026-conference-on-complex-systems-binghamton-ny-usa/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abstract submission deadline: &#160;<strong> <span class="Apple-tab-span"> </span>May 1, 2026</strong></p>
<p>We call for submissions of abstracts for oral and poster presentations on a wide variety of complex systems research. Relevant topics include (but are not limited to):</p>
<ul>
 <li>Theoretical foundations of complex systems</li>
 <li>Nonlinear dynamics and chaos</li>
 <li>Systems theory, information theory, and systems science</li>
 <li>Game theory, decision theory, and socio-economical applications</li>
 <li>Self-organization, pattern formation, and collective behavior</li>
 <li>Structure and dynamics of complex networks</li>
 <li>Sustainability and adaptability of complex systems</li>
 <li>Bio-inspired systems, machine learning, and evolutionary computation</li>
 <li>Data-driven approaches to complex systems</li>
 <li>Applications to the humanities, art, and literature</li>
 <li>Historical and philosophical aspects of complex systems</li>
 <li>Complex systems and education</li>
</ul>
<p>More at: <a target="_blank" href="https://ccs26.cssociety.org/" rel="noopener">ccs26.cssociety.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abstract submission deadline: &nbsp;<strong> <span class="Apple-tab-span"> </span>May 1, 2026</strong></p>
<p>We call for submissions of abstracts for oral and poster presentations on a wide variety of complex systems research. Relevant topics include (but are not limited to):</p>
<ul>
<li>Theoretical foundations of complex systems</li>
<li>Nonlinear dynamics and chaos</li>
<li>Systems theory, information theory, and systems science</li>
<li>Game theory, decision theory, and socio-economical applications</li>
<li>Self-organization, pattern formation, and collective behavior</li>
<li>Structure and dynamics of complex networks</li>
<li>Sustainability and adaptability of complex systems</li>
<li>Bio-inspired systems, machine learning, and evolutionary computation</li>
<li>Data-driven approaches to complex systems</li>
<li>Applications to the humanities, art, and literature</li>
<li>Historical and philosophical aspects of complex systems</li>
<li>Complex systems and education</li>
</ul>
<p>More at: <a target="_blank" href="https://ccs26.cssociety.org/" rel="noopener">ccs26.cssociety.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62441</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The degree of fine-tuning in our universe &#8211; and others</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/04/the-degree-of-fine-tuning-in-our-universe-and-others/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 22:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62436</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Adams, Fred C.<br>Both the fundamental constants that describe the laws of physics and the cosmological parameters that determine the properties of our universe must fall within a range of values in order for the cosmos to develop astrophysical structures and ultimately support life. This paper reviews the current constraints on these quantities. The discussion starts with an assessment of the parameters that are allowed to vary. The standard model of particle physics contains both coupling constants (α ,αs ,αw) and particle masses (mu ,md ,me) , and the allowed ranges of these parameters are discussed first. We then consider cosmological parameters, including the total energy density of the universe (Ω) , the contribution from vacuum energy (ρΛ) , the baryon-to-photon ratio (η) , the dark matter contribution (δ) , and the amplitude of primordial density fluctuations (Q) . These quantities are constrained by the requirements that the universe lives for a sufficiently long time, emerges from the epoch of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis with an acceptable chemical composition, and can successfully produce large scale structures such as galaxies. On smaller scales, stars and planets must be able to form and function. The stars must be sufficiently long-lived, have high enough surface temperatures, and have smaller masses than their host galaxies. The planets must be massive enough to hold onto an atmosphere, yet small enough to remain non-degenerate, and contain enough particles to support a biosphere of sufficient complexity. These requirements place constraints on the gravitational structure constant (αG) , the fine structure constant (α) , and composite parameters (C⋆) that specify nuclear reaction rates. We then consider specific instances of possible fine-tuning in stellar nucleosynthesis, including the triple alpha reaction that produces carbon, the case of unstable deuterium, and the possibility of stable diprotons. For all of the issues outlined above, viable universes exist over a range of parameter space, which is delineated herein. Finally, for universes with significantly different parameters, new types of astrophysical processes can generate energy and thereby support habitability.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="http://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PhR...807....1A/abstract" rel="noopener">ui.adsabs.harvard.edu</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adams, Fred C.<br />Both the fundamental constants that describe the laws of physics and the cosmological parameters that determine the properties of our universe must fall within a range of values in order for the cosmos to develop astrophysical structures and ultimately support life. This paper reviews the current constraints on these quantities. The discussion starts with an assessment of the parameters that are allowed to vary. The standard model of particle physics contains both coupling constants (α ,αs ,αw) and particle masses (mu ,md ,me) , and the allowed ranges of these parameters are discussed first. We then consider cosmological parameters, including the total energy density of the universe (Ω) , the contribution from vacuum energy (ρΛ) , the baryon-to-photon ratio (η) , the dark matter contribution (δ) , and the amplitude of primordial density fluctuations (Q) . These quantities are constrained by the requirements that the universe lives for a sufficiently long time, emerges from the epoch of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis with an acceptable chemical composition, and can successfully produce large scale structures such as galaxies. On smaller scales, stars and planets must be able to form and function. The stars must be sufficiently long-lived, have high enough surface temperatures, and have smaller masses than their host galaxies. The planets must be massive enough to hold onto an atmosphere, yet small enough to remain non-degenerate, and contain enough particles to support a biosphere of sufficient complexity. These requirements place constraints on the gravitational structure constant (αG) , the fine structure constant (α) , and composite parameters (C⋆) that specify nuclear reaction rates. We then consider specific instances of possible fine-tuning in stellar nucleosynthesis, including the triple alpha reaction that produces carbon, the case of unstable deuterium, and the possibility of stable diprotons. For all of the issues outlined above, viable universes exist over a range of parameter space, which is delineated herein. Finally, for universes with significantly different parameters, new types of astrophysical processes can generate energy and thereby support habitability.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="http://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PhR...807....1A/abstract" rel="noopener">ui.adsabs.harvard.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62436</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>3D Imaging of Honeybee Swarm Assembly and Disassembly</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/03/3d-imaging-of-honeybee-swarm-assembly-and-disassembly/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 22:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Danielle L. Chase, Daniel Zhu, Mahi Kathait, Henry Robertson, Jash Shah, Sully Harrer, Gary Nave, Nolan R. Bonnie, Orit Peleg</p>
<p>When honeybee colonies reproduce by fission, several thousand bees and their queen depart the parental nest and temporarily form a dense cluster on a tree branch or other surface while searching for a new nest site. Once the new nest site is selected, the swarm disassembles and flies toward it. How honeybees transition rapidly between dispersed flight and an aggregated cluster remains an open question. Here, we develop an experimental system and three-dimensional imaging pipeline to track individual flying bees together with the evolving morphology of the swarm during formation and dissolution. We report results from a representative swarming event. During assembly, swarms rapidly form low-density clusters before undergoing a slower contraction to a more dense steady state configuration. In contrast, disassembly occurs significantly faster than assembly and is characterized by strongly divergent flight, with bees departing the swarm in all directions. Overall, this method is able to demonstrate the coupled flight and morphological dynamics that underlie honeybee swarm assembly. Because the system is relatively low-cost and low-power, it is readily adaptable for three-dimensional imaging of other biological collectives in naturalistic environments.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.17.711698v1" rel="noopener">www.biorxiv.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danielle L. Chase, Daniel Zhu, Mahi Kathait, Henry Robertson, Jash Shah, Sully Harrer, Gary Nave, Nolan R. Bonnie, Orit Peleg</p>
<p>When honeybee colonies reproduce by fission, several thousand bees and their queen depart the parental nest and temporarily form a dense cluster on a tree branch or other surface while searching for a new nest site. Once the new nest site is selected, the swarm disassembles and flies toward it. How honeybees transition rapidly between dispersed flight and an aggregated cluster remains an open question. Here, we develop an experimental system and three-dimensional imaging pipeline to track individual flying bees together with the evolving morphology of the swarm during formation and dissolution. We report results from a representative swarming event. During assembly, swarms rapidly form low-density clusters before undergoing a slower contraction to a more dense steady state configuration. In contrast, disassembly occurs significantly faster than assembly and is characterized by strongly divergent flight, with bees departing the swarm in all directions. Overall, this method is able to demonstrate the coupled flight and morphological dynamics that underlie honeybee swarm assembly. Because the system is relatively low-cost and low-power, it is readily adaptable for three-dimensional imaging of other biological collectives in naturalistic environments.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.17.711698v1" rel="noopener">www.biorxiv.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62433</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinking—Fast, Slow, and Artificial: How AI is Reshaping Human Reasoning and the Rise of Cognitive Surrende</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/02/thinking-fast-slow-and-artificial-how-ai-is-reshaping-human-reasoning-and-the-rise-of-cognitive-surrende/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 23:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Steven D Shaw, Gideon Nave</p>
<p>People increasingly consult generative artificial intelligence (AI) while reasoning. As AI becomes embedded in daily thought, what becomes of human judgment? We introduce Tri-System Theory, extending dual-process accounts of reasoning by positing System 3: artificial cognition that operates outside the brain. System 3 can supplement or supplant internal processes, introducing novel cognitive pathways. A key prediction of the theory is "cognitive surrender"-adopting AI outputs with minimal scrutiny, overriding intuition (System 1) and deliberation (System 2). Across three preregistered experiments using an adapted Cognitive Reflection Test (N = 1,372; 9,593 trials), we randomized AI accuracy via hidden seed prompts. Participants chose to consult an AI assistant on a majority of trials (&#62;50%). Relative to baseline (no System 3 access), accuracy significantly rose when AI was accurate and fell when it erred (+25/-15 percentage points; Study 1), the behavioral signature of cognitive surrender (AI-Accurate vs. AI-Faulty contrast; Cohen's h = 0.81). Engaging System 3 also increased confidence, even following errors. Time pressure (Study 2) and per-item incentives and feedback (Study 3) shifted baseline performance but did not eliminate this pattern: when accurate, AI buffered time-pressure costs and amplified incentive gains; when faulty, it consistently reduced accuracy regardless of situational moderators. Across studies, participants with higher trust in AI and lower need for cognition and fluid intelligence showed greater surrender to System 3. Tri-System Theory thus characterizes a triadic cognitive ecology, revealing how System 3 reframes human reasoning and may reshape autonomy and accountability in the age of AI.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6097646" rel="noopener">papers.ssrn.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven D Shaw, Gideon Nave</p>
<p>People increasingly consult generative artificial intelligence (AI) while reasoning. As AI becomes embedded in daily thought, what becomes of human judgment? We introduce Tri-System Theory, extending dual-process accounts of reasoning by positing System 3: artificial cognition that operates outside the brain. System 3 can supplement or supplant internal processes, introducing novel cognitive pathways. A key prediction of the theory is &#8220;cognitive surrender&#8221;-adopting AI outputs with minimal scrutiny, overriding intuition (System 1) and deliberation (System 2). Across three preregistered experiments using an adapted Cognitive Reflection Test (N = 1,372; 9,593 trials), we randomized AI accuracy via hidden seed prompts. Participants chose to consult an AI assistant on a majority of trials (&gt;50%). Relative to baseline (no System 3 access), accuracy significantly rose when AI was accurate and fell when it erred (+25/-15 percentage points; Study 1), the behavioral signature of cognitive surrender (AI-Accurate vs. AI-Faulty contrast; Cohen&#8217;s h = 0.81). Engaging System 3 also increased confidence, even following errors. Time pressure (Study 2) and per-item incentives and feedback (Study 3) shifted baseline performance but did not eliminate this pattern: when accurate, AI buffered time-pressure costs and amplified incentive gains; when faulty, it consistently reduced accuracy regardless of situational moderators. Across studies, participants with higher trust in AI and lower need for cognition and fluid intelligence showed greater surrender to System 3. Tri-System Theory thus characterizes a triadic cognitive ecology, revealing how System 3 reframes human reasoning and may reshape autonomy and accountability in the age of AI.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6097646" rel="noopener">papers.ssrn.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62430</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Directional information transfer between interacting Brownian particles</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/04/02/directional-information-transfer-between-interacting-brownian-particles/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 20:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Tenta Tani<br>We theoretically investigate how information flows when two particles interact with each other. Understanding the physical mechanisms of directional information flow is crucial for advancing information thermodynamics and stochastic computing. However, the fundamental connection between mechanical motion and causal information transfer remains elusive. To focus only on essential effects of physical dynamics, we examine two interacting Brownian particles confined in a one-dimensional potential. By simulating their Langevin dynamics, we quantify the causal information exchange using transfer entropy. We demonstrate that a mass asymmetry inherently breaks the symmetry of information flow, inducing a net directional transfer from the heavier to the lighter particle. Physically, the heavier particle, possessing larger inertia and higher active information storage, retains the memory of its trajectory longer against thermal fluctuations, thereby acting as a source of information. We analytically clarify that this net transfer is governed by a competition between the difference in memory capacity and the predictability of the particle trajectories. Furthermore, we reveal that the net information flow scales logarithmically with the mass ratio. These findings provide essential insights into the physical significance of transfer entropy and the nature of information flow in general physical systems.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10475" rel="noopener">arxiv.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tenta Tani<br />We theoretically investigate how information flows when two particles interact with each other. Understanding the physical mechanisms of directional information flow is crucial for advancing information thermodynamics and stochastic computing. However, the fundamental connection between mechanical motion and causal information transfer remains elusive. To focus only on essential effects of physical dynamics, we examine two interacting Brownian particles confined in a one-dimensional potential. By simulating their Langevin dynamics, we quantify the causal information exchange using transfer entropy. We demonstrate that a mass asymmetry inherently breaks the symmetry of information flow, inducing a net directional transfer from the heavier to the lighter particle. Physically, the heavier particle, possessing larger inertia and higher active information storage, retains the memory of its trajectory longer against thermal fluctuations, thereby acting as a source of information. We analytically clarify that this net transfer is governed by a competition between the difference in memory capacity and the predictability of the particle trajectories. Furthermore, we reveal that the net information flow scales logarithmically with the mass ratio. These findings provide essential insights into the physical significance of transfer entropy and the nature of information flow in general physical systems.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10475" rel="noopener">arxiv.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62428</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Influence and the Logic of Collective Action, by Sergey Gavrilets</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/31/social-influence-and-the-logic-of-collective-action-by-sergey-gavrilets/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 20:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/31/social-influence-and-the-logic-of-collective-action-by-sergey-gavrilets/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://cxdig.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/3d7492ad-f437-4234-aaf8-82a4706611d1-1.jpg" class="aligncenter" style="width: 100%"></p>
<p>Collective action has been a fundamental aspect of human societies throughout history, from building irrigation systems and defenses in Neolithic times to coordinated disaster relief and scientific collaborations today. In this book, Sergey Gavrilets explains when and why groups of people cooperate, presenting a quantitative framework that unifies game theory with models of social influence, cognition, and individual and cultural variation. He shows how humans’ deep susceptibility to social influence—grounded in evolutionary need to cooperate and learn from peers, reinforced by deference to parents and elders, and extended to cultural, religious, and political leaders—shapes norms, beliefs, and collective outcomes.<br><br>Integrating previously separate literatures, Gavrilets introduces explicit dynamics for norms and beliefs, quantifies the effects of individual and cultural differences, and tests predictions across societies. Drawing on formal, data-based mathematical modeling supported by behavioral experiments and studies of online behavior, he concludes that successful collective action depends on six interacting forces: material payoffs, personal norms and attitudes, social influence, cognition, evolving social norms and beliefs about others, and individual and cultural differences. Lasting cultural change, he argues, depends on norms and institutions that shape behavior through persuasion, nudging, and enforcement. Gavrilets translates this theory into practical, testable strategies for policy and design, including targeted messaging, dynamic norms, and culturally sensitive approaches, and connects it to broader theories of behavior change.</p>
<p>More at: <a target="_blank" href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/ebook/9780691294834/social-influence-and-the-logic-of-collective-action" rel="noopener">press.princeton.edu</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://comdig.cssociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/3d7492ad-f437-4234-aaf8-82a4706611d1-1.jpg" class="aligncenter" style="width: 100%"></p>
<p>Collective action has been a fundamental aspect of human societies throughout history, from building irrigation systems and defenses in Neolithic times to coordinated disaster relief and scientific collaborations today. In this book, Sergey Gavrilets explains when and why groups of people cooperate, presenting a quantitative framework that unifies game theory with models of social influence, cognition, and individual and cultural variation. He shows how humans’ deep susceptibility to social influence—grounded in evolutionary need to cooperate and learn from peers, reinforced by deference to parents and elders, and extended to cultural, religious, and political leaders—shapes norms, beliefs, and collective outcomes.</p>
<p>Integrating previously separate literatures, Gavrilets introduces explicit dynamics for norms and beliefs, quantifies the effects of individual and cultural differences, and tests predictions across societies. Drawing on formal, data-based mathematical modeling supported by behavioral experiments and studies of online behavior, he concludes that successful collective action depends on six interacting forces: material payoffs, personal norms and attitudes, social influence, cognition, evolving social norms and beliefs about others, and individual and cultural differences. Lasting cultural change, he argues, depends on norms and institutions that shape behavior through persuasion, nudging, and enforcement. Gavrilets translates this theory into practical, testable strategies for policy and design, including targeted messaging, dynamic norms, and culturally sensitive approaches, and connects it to broader theories of behavior change.</p>
<p>More at: <a target="_blank" href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/ebook/9780691294834/social-influence-and-the-logic-of-collective-action" rel="noopener">press.princeton.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62426</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://comdig.cssociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/3d7492ad-f437-4234-aaf8-82a4706611d1-1.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>From description to design: Automated engineering of complex systems with desirable emergent properties</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/29/from-description-to-design-automated-engineering-of-complex-systems-with-desirable-emergent-properties/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 16:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62419</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Thomas F. Varley, Josh Bongard<br>The study of complex systems has produced a huge library of different descriptive statistics that scientists can use to describe the various emergent patterns that characterize complex systems. The problem of engineering systems to display those patterns from first principles is a much harder one, however, as a hallmark of complexity is that macro-scale emergent properties are often difficult to predict from micro-scale features. Here, we propose a general optimization-based pipeline to automate the difficult problem of engineering emergent features by re-purposing descriptive statistics as loss functions, and letting a gradient descent optimizer do the hard work of designing the relevant micro-scale features and interactions. Using Kuramoto systems of coupled oscillators as a test bed, we show that our approach can reliably produce systems with non-trivial global properties, including higher-order synergistic information, multi-attractor metastability, and meso-scale structures such as modules and integrated information. We further show that this pipeline can also account for and accommodate constraints on the system properties, such as the costs of connections, or topological restrictions. This work is a step forward on the path moving complex systems science from a field predicated largely on description and post-hoc storytelling towards one capable of engineering real-world systems with desirable emergent meso-scale and macro-scale properties.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15631" rel="noopener">arxiv.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas F. Varley, Josh Bongard<br />The study of complex systems has produced a huge library of different descriptive statistics that scientists can use to describe the various emergent patterns that characterize complex systems. The problem of engineering systems to display those patterns from first principles is a much harder one, however, as a hallmark of complexity is that macro-scale emergent properties are often difficult to predict from micro-scale features. Here, we propose a general optimization-based pipeline to automate the difficult problem of engineering emergent features by re-purposing descriptive statistics as loss functions, and letting a gradient descent optimizer do the hard work of designing the relevant micro-scale features and interactions. Using Kuramoto systems of coupled oscillators as a test bed, we show that our approach can reliably produce systems with non-trivial global properties, including higher-order synergistic information, multi-attractor metastability, and meso-scale structures such as modules and integrated information. We further show that this pipeline can also account for and accommodate constraints on the system properties, such as the costs of connections, or topological restrictions. This work is a step forward on the path moving complex systems science from a field predicated largely on description and post-hoc storytelling towards one capable of engineering real-world systems with desirable emergent meso-scale and macro-scale properties.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15631" rel="noopener">arxiv.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62419</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jordan Scharnhorst: Entropy, Coarse-graining, and the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/25/jordan-scharnhorst-entropy-coarse-graining-and-the-2nd-law-of-thermodynamics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Talks]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/25/jordan-scharnhorst-entropy-coarse-graining-and-the-2nd-law-of-thermodynamics/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[
 


 <span style="text-align: left">Binghamton Center of Complex Systems (CoCo) Extra Seminar March 24, 2026</span>

<p>Watch at: <a target="_blank" href="https://vimeo.com/1176730203" rel="noopener">vimeo.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <span style="text-align: left">Binghamton Center of Complex Systems (CoCo) Extra Seminar March 24, 2026</span></p>
<p>Watch at: <a target="_blank" href="https://vimeo.com/1176730203" rel="noopener">vimeo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62411</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antifragility: A Cross-Cutting Concept for Understanding Ecological Responses to Variability</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/25/antifragility-a-cross-cutting-concept-for-understanding-ecological-responses-to-variability/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 13:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62408</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Jonas Wickman, Christopher A. Klausmeier, and Elena Litchman</p>
<p>The American Naturalist</p>
<p>Environmental variability, in the form of either temporal fluctuations or intermittent perturbations, affects virtually all ecological systems. However, while temporal variability is widely recognized to play an important role across many ecological and evolutionary subdisciplines, there is no high-level cross-cutting concept that describes how species, communities, and ecosystems respond to variability. In this article we propose that “antifragility” could serve well as such a concept. Initially used in economics, antifragility denotes that a property or metric of performance increases with variability. To showcase the breadth of applicability and utility of the concept, we examine two mathematical models for antifragility in ecosystem services and competition. We also demonstrate some of the nuances and possible misapplications of the concept. Under global change, the variability of environmental conditions is expected to change. We believe that antifragility could serve as a useful concept in coordinating research efforts toward understanding the effects of these changes.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/740143" rel="noopener">www.journals.uchicago.edu</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonas Wickman, Christopher A. Klausmeier, and Elena Litchman</p>
<p>The American Naturalist</p>
<p>Environmental variability, in the form of either temporal fluctuations or intermittent perturbations, affects virtually all ecological systems. However, while temporal variability is widely recognized to play an important role across many ecological and evolutionary subdisciplines, there is no high-level cross-cutting concept that describes how species, communities, and ecosystems respond to variability. In this article we propose that “antifragility” could serve well as such a concept. Initially used in economics, antifragility denotes that a property or metric of performance increases with variability. To showcase the breadth of applicability and utility of the concept, we examine two mathematical models for antifragility in ecosystem services and competition. We also demonstrate some of the nuances and possible misapplications of the concept. Under global change, the variability of environmental conditions is expected to change. We believe that antifragility could serve as a useful concept in coordinating research efforts toward understanding the effects of these changes.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/740143" rel="noopener">www.journals.uchicago.edu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62408</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Call for Papers for the 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐋𝐢𝐟𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐒𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 special session at ALIFE Conference 2026</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/24/call-for-papers-for-the-%f0%9d%90%80%f0%9d%90%ab%f0%9d%90%ad%f0%9d%90%a2%f0%9d%90%9f%f0%9d%90%a2%f0%9d%90%9c%f0%9d%90%a2%f0%9d%90%9a%f0%9d%90%a5-%f0%9d%90%8b%f0%9d%90%a2%f0%9d%90%9f%f0%9d%90%9e/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 13:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/24/call-for-papers-for-the-%f0%9d%90%80%f0%9d%90%ab%f0%9d%90%ad%f0%9d%90%a2%f0%9d%90%9f%f0%9d%90%a2%f0%9d%90%9c%f0%9d%90%a2%f0%9d%90%9a%f0%9d%90%a5-%f0%9d%90%8b%f0%9d%90%a2%f0%9d%90%9f%f0%9d%90%9e/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>More information about the session and how to submit: <a href="https://alifeforscience.github.io" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://alifeforscience.github.io</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More information about the session and how to submit: <a href="https://alifeforscience.github.io" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://alifeforscience.github.io</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62406</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scaling laws for function diversity and specialization across socioeconomic and biological complex systems</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/15/scaling-laws-for-function-diversity-and-specialization-across-socioeconomic-and-biological-complex-systems/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 20:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62393</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Vicky Chuqiao Yang, James Holehouse, Hyejin Youn, José Ignacio Arroyo, Sidney Redner, Geoffrey B. West, and Christopher P. Kempes</p>
<p>PNAS 123 (7) e2509729123</p>
<p>Diversification and specialization are central to complex adaptive systems, yet overarching principles across domains remain elusive. We introduce a general theory that unifies diversity and specialization across disparate systems, including microbes, federal agencies, companies, universities, and cities, characterized by two key parameters. We show from extensive data that function diversity scales with system size as a sublinear power law-resembling Heaps’ law-in all but cities, where it is logarithmic. Our theory explains both behaviors and suggests that function creation depends on system goals and structure: federal agencies tend to ensure functional coverage; cities slow new function growth as old ones expand, and cells occupy an intermediate position. Once functions are introduced, their growth follows a remarkably universal pattern across all systems.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2509729123" rel="noopener">www.pnas.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vicky Chuqiao Yang, James Holehouse, Hyejin Youn, José Ignacio Arroyo, Sidney Redner, Geoffrey B. West, and Christopher P. Kempes</p>
<p>PNAS 123 (7) e2509729123</p>
<p>Diversification and specialization are central to complex adaptive systems, yet overarching principles across domains remain elusive. We introduce a general theory that unifies diversity and specialization across disparate systems, including microbes, federal agencies, companies, universities, and cities, characterized by two key parameters. We show from extensive data that function diversity scales with system size as a sublinear power law-resembling Heaps’ law-in all but cities, where it is logarithmic. Our theory explains both behaviors and suggests that function creation depends on system goals and structure: federal agencies tend to ensure functional coverage; cities slow new function growth as old ones expand, and cells occupy an intermediate position. Once functions are introduced, their growth follows a remarkably universal pattern across all systems.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2509729123" rel="noopener">www.pnas.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62393</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI agents are ‘aeroplanes for the mind’: five ways to ensure that scientists are responsible pilots</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/15/ai-agents-are-aeroplanes-for-the-mind-five-ways-to-ensure-that-scientists-are-responsible-pilots/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 18:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62391</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://cxdig.files.wordpress.com/2026/03/7d7ccadc-09d5-4c15-a351-c21483e1cbe1-1.jpg" class="alignleft" style="width: 50%"></p>
<p>Dashun Wang</p>
<p>As artificial-intelligence systems take on more of the scientific workflow, the central goal should not be complete automation, but designing platforms that preserve creativity, responsibility and surprise.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00665-y" rel="noopener">www.nature.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://comdig.cssociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/7d7ccadc-09d5-4c15-a351-c21483e1cbe1-1.jpg?w=1108" class="alignleft" style="width: 50%"></p>
<p>Dashun Wang</p>
<p>As artificial-intelligence systems take on more of the scientific workflow, the central goal should not be complete automation, but designing platforms that preserve creativity, responsibility and surprise.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00665-y" rel="noopener">www.nature.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62391</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://comdig.cssociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/7d7ccadc-09d5-4c15-a351-c21483e1cbe1-1.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is emergence, after all?</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/13/what-is-emergence-after-all/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 18:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62385</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abbas K Rizi</p>
<p>PNAS Nexus, Volume 5, Issue 2, February 2026, pgag010,</p>
<p>The term emergence is increasingly used across scientific disciplines to describe phenomena that arise from interactions among a system's components but cannot be readily inferred by examining those components in isolation. While often invoked to explain higher-level behaviors—such as flocking, synchronization, or collective intelligence—the term is frequently used without precision, sometimes giving rise to ambiguity or even mystique. In this perspective paper, I clarify the scientific meaning of emergence as a measurable and physically grounded phenomenon. Through concrete examples—such as temperature, magnetism, and herd immunity in social networks—I review how collective behavior can arise from local interactions that are constrained by global boundaries. By refining the concept of emergence, it is possible to gain a clearer and more grounded understanding of complex systems. My goal is to show that emergence, when properly framed, offers not mysticism, but rather insight.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/5/2/pgag010/8429832" rel="noopener">academic.oup.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abbas K Rizi</p>
<p>PNAS Nexus, Volume 5, Issue 2, February 2026, pgag010,</p>
<p>The term emergence is increasingly used across scientific disciplines to describe phenomena that arise from interactions among a system&#8217;s components but cannot be readily inferred by examining those components in isolation. While often invoked to explain higher-level behaviors—such as flocking, synchronization, or collective intelligence—the term is frequently used without precision, sometimes giving rise to ambiguity or even mystique. In this perspective paper, I clarify the scientific meaning of emergence as a measurable and physically grounded phenomenon. Through concrete examples—such as temperature, magnetism, and herd immunity in social networks—I review how collective behavior can arise from local interactions that are constrained by global boundaries. By refining the concept of emergence, it is possible to gain a clearer and more grounded understanding of complex systems. My goal is to show that emergence, when properly framed, offers not mysticism, but rather insight.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/5/2/pgag010/8429832" rel="noopener">academic.oup.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62385</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Economy as an Evolving Complex System IV</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/13/the-economy-as-an-evolving-complex-system-iv/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 18:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/13/the-economy-as-an-evolving-complex-system-iv/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://cxdig.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/c9ee8529-9c91-4924-9ce2-fb2115c4981e.jpg" class="aligncenter" style="width: 100%"></p>
<p>The contemporary global economy exhibits unprecedented structural complexity—characterized by nonlinear dynamics, adaptive behaviors, and emergent properties. Understanding these phenomena requires theoretical frameworks capable of addressing complexity, path dependence, and evolutionary processes.</p>
<p>Complexity economics has developed to address such intellectual challenges. Originating in a seminal 1987 Santa Fe Institute workshop and first described in The Economy as an Evolving Complex System (1988), this approach fundamentally reconceptualizes economic systems as complex adaptive systems. Subsequent volumes (1997, 2005) progressively developed this framework, offering new insights into finance, technological innovation, and social interactions.</p>
<p>Like each of its predecessors, this fourth volume is the product of an interdisciplinary workshop hosted at the Santa Fe Institute. It represents the latest synthesis, reflecting theoretical advances and methodological developments achieved over nearly four decades. Drawing on contributions from leading scholars worldwide, the chapters span foundational questions to policy applications—from agent-based modeling and network theory to macroeconomic dynamics, innovation systems, sustainability transitions, and inequality.</p>
<p>The result demonstrates complexity economics' capacity to generate novel insights into phenomena that remain puzzling within traditional frameworks: financial instability, technological disruption, climate economics, and institutional change. This volume positions complexity economics as an essential analytical framework for understanding twenty-first-century economic realities.</p>
<p>More at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sfipress.org/books/eecs-iv" rel="noopener">www.sfipress.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://comdig.cssociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/c9ee8529-9c91-4924-9ce2-fb2115c4981e.jpg" class="aligncenter" style="width: 100%"></p>
<p>The contemporary global economy exhibits unprecedented structural complexity—characterized by nonlinear dynamics, adaptive behaviors, and emergent properties. Understanding these phenomena requires theoretical frameworks capable of addressing complexity, path dependence, and evolutionary processes.</p>
<p>Complexity economics has developed to address such intellectual challenges. Originating in a seminal 1987 Santa Fe Institute workshop and first described in The Economy as an Evolving Complex System (1988), this approach fundamentally reconceptualizes economic systems as complex adaptive systems. Subsequent volumes (1997, 2005) progressively developed this framework, offering new insights into finance, technological innovation, and social interactions.</p>
<p>Like each of its predecessors, this fourth volume is the product of an interdisciplinary workshop hosted at the Santa Fe Institute. It represents the latest synthesis, reflecting theoretical advances and methodological developments achieved over nearly four decades. Drawing on contributions from leading scholars worldwide, the chapters span foundational questions to policy applications—from agent-based modeling and network theory to macroeconomic dynamics, innovation systems, sustainability transitions, and inequality.</p>
<p>The result demonstrates complexity economics&#8217; capacity to generate novel insights into phenomena that remain puzzling within traditional frameworks: financial instability, technological disruption, climate economics, and institutional change. This volume positions complexity economics as an essential analytical framework for understanding twenty-first-century economic realities.</p>
<p>More at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sfipress.org/books/eecs-iv" rel="noopener">www.sfipress.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62383</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://comdig.cssociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/c9ee8529-9c91-4924-9ce2-fb2115c4981e.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the equivalence between nonlinear graph-based dynamics and linear dynamics on higher-order networks</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/12/on-the-equivalence-between-nonlinear-graph-based-dynamics-and-linear-dynamics-on-higher-order-networks/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 18:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lucas Lacasa<br>In network science, collective dynamics of complex systems are typically modelled as (nonlinear, often including many-body) vertex-level update rules evolving over a graph interaction structure. In recent years, frameworks that explicitly model such higher-order interactions in the interaction backbone (i.e. hypergraphs) have been advanced, somehow shifting the imputation of the effective nonlinearity from the dynamics to the interaction structure. In this work we discuss such structural--dynamical representation duality, and investigate how and when a nonlinear dynamics defined on the vertex set of a graph allows an equivalent representation in terms of a linear dynamics defined on the state space of a sufficiently richer, higher-order interaction structure. Using Carleman linearisation arguments, we show that finite polynomial dynamics defined in the &#124;V&#124; vertices of a graph admit an exact representation as linear dynamics on the state space of an hb-graph of order &#124;V&#124;, a combinatorial structure that extends hypergraphs by allowing vertex multiplicity, where the specific shape of the nonlinearity indicates whether the hb-graph is either finite or infinite (in terms of the number of hb-edges). For more general analytic nonlinearities, exact linear representation always require an hb-graph of infinite size, and its finite-size truncation provides an approximate representation of the original nonlinear graph-based dynamics.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21727" rel="noopener">arxiv.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucas Lacasa<br />In network science, collective dynamics of complex systems are typically modelled as (nonlinear, often including many-body) vertex-level update rules evolving over a graph interaction structure. In recent years, frameworks that explicitly model such higher-order interactions in the interaction backbone (i.e. hypergraphs) have been advanced, somehow shifting the imputation of the effective nonlinearity from the dynamics to the interaction structure. In this work we discuss such structural&#8211;dynamical representation duality, and investigate how and when a nonlinear dynamics defined on the vertex set of a graph allows an equivalent representation in terms of a linear dynamics defined on the state space of a sufficiently richer, higher-order interaction structure. Using Carleman linearisation arguments, we show that finite polynomial dynamics defined in the |V| vertices of a graph admit an exact representation as linear dynamics on the state space of an hb-graph of order |V|, a combinatorial structure that extends hypergraphs by allowing vertex multiplicity, where the specific shape of the nonlinearity indicates whether the hb-graph is either finite or infinite (in terms of the number of hb-edges). For more general analytic nonlinearities, exact linear representation always require an hb-graph of infinite size, and its finite-size truncation provides an approximate representation of the original nonlinear graph-based dynamics.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21727" rel="noopener">arxiv.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62378</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Metrology of Complexity and Implications for the Study of the Emergence of Life</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/12/metrology-of-complexity-and-implications-for-the-study-of-the-emergence-of-life/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 13:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62375</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sara Imari Walker<br>One of the longest standing open problems in science is how life arises from non-living matter. If it is possible to measure this transition in the lab, then it might be possible to understand the physical mechanisms by which the emergence of life occurs, which so far have evaded scientific understanding. A significant hurdle is the lack of standards or a framework for cross comparison across different experimental contexts and planetary environments. In this essay, I review current challenges in experimental approaches to origin of life chemistry, focusing on those associated with quantifying experimental selectivity versus de novo generation of molecular complexity, and I highlight new methods using molecular assembly theory to measure molecular complexity. This metrology-centered approach can enable rigorous testing of hypotheses about the cascade of major transitions in molecular order marking the emergence of life, while potentially bridging traditional divides between metabolism-first and genetics-first scenarios. Grounding the study of life's origins in measurable complexity has significant implications for the search for life beyond Earth, suggesting paths toward theory-driven detection of biological complexity in diverse planetary contexts. As the field moves forward, standardized measurements of molecular complexity may help unify currently disparate approaches to understanding how matter transforms to life. Much remains to be done in this exciting frontier.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18203" rel="noopener">arxiv.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sara Imari Walker<br />One of the longest standing open problems in science is how life arises from non-living matter. If it is possible to measure this transition in the lab, then it might be possible to understand the physical mechanisms by which the emergence of life occurs, which so far have evaded scientific understanding. A significant hurdle is the lack of standards or a framework for cross comparison across different experimental contexts and planetary environments. In this essay, I review current challenges in experimental approaches to origin of life chemistry, focusing on those associated with quantifying experimental selectivity versus de novo generation of molecular complexity, and I highlight new methods using molecular assembly theory to measure molecular complexity. This metrology-centered approach can enable rigorous testing of hypotheses about the cascade of major transitions in molecular order marking the emergence of life, while potentially bridging traditional divides between metabolism-first and genetics-first scenarios. Grounding the study of life&#8217;s origins in measurable complexity has significant implications for the search for life beyond Earth, suggesting paths toward theory-driven detection of biological complexity in diverse planetary contexts. As the field moves forward, standardized measurements of molecular complexity may help unify currently disparate approaches to understanding how matter transforms to life. Much remains to be done in this exciting frontier.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18203" rel="noopener">arxiv.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62375</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>IS ALL THAT GLITTERS A NETWORK? SEARCHING FOR THE BOUNDARIES OF THE NETWORK APPROACH</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/11/is-all-that-glitters-a-network-searching-for-the-boundaries-of-the-network-approach/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 19:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ONERVA KORHONEN</p>
<p>Advances in Complex Systems Vol. 28, No. 08, 2530001 (2025)</p>
<p>Network analysis has become a powerful tool in various fields. However, the increasing popularity comes with potential problems. Unfamiliarity with the characteristics of the systems under investigation complicates network model construction and interpretation of analysis outcomes. While these issues require special attention in studies that apply the increasingly complex higher-order connectivity models, similar problems are associated with all, even the most simple, network models. Alongside technical issues, network scientists face a philosophical question: can the network approach discover the fundamental nature of a system, on the one hand, and produce useful information, on the other hand. In this perspective, I review the potential problems of the network approach and propose two solutions to address them: active evaluation of the potential and limitations of the network framework before applying a network model and a transition toward an interdisciplinary research practice to interpret analysis outcomes in their right context.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscinet/acs" rel="noopener">www.worldscientific.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ONERVA KORHONEN</p>
<p>Advances in Complex Systems Vol. 28, No. 08, 2530001 (2025)</p>
<p>Network analysis has become a powerful tool in various fields. However, the increasing popularity comes with potential problems. Unfamiliarity with the characteristics of the systems under investigation complicates network model construction and interpretation of analysis outcomes. While these issues require special attention in studies that apply the increasingly complex higher-order connectivity models, similar problems are associated with all, even the most simple, network models. Alongside technical issues, network scientists face a philosophical question: can the network approach discover the fundamental nature of a system, on the one hand, and produce useful information, on the other hand. In this perspective, I review the potential problems of the network approach and propose two solutions to address them: active evaluation of the potential and limitations of the network framework before applying a network model and a transition toward an interdisciplinary research practice to interpret analysis outcomes in their right context.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscinet/acs" rel="noopener">www.worldscientific.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62372</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>State-Expanding Systems: A Constraint-Limited Theory of Novelty Growth</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/11/state-expanding-systems-a-constraint-limited-theory-of-novelty-growth/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 18:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62370</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Costolo, Michael</p>
<p>This paper introduces a constraint-limited model of combinatorial growth that examines how feasibility scales with increasing system dimensionality. The framework analyzes the balance between expanding possibility spaces and constraint structures that prune feasible configurations. The model shows that when feasible configurations grow as c^n within a combinatorial space of size 2^n, the feasible fraction collapses for constant c &#60; 2. Sustained novelty generation therefore requires c(n) to approach the combinatorial base, producing a narrow “complexity corridor” between regimes of trivial repetition and combinatorial sparsity. The paper derives the analytic structure of this corridor and explores it through numerical simulations and visualizations. The results suggest a possible structural explanation for why complex systems may emerge only within a narrow range where combinatorial expansion and constraint relaxation operate at comparable scales. &#160;The manuscript includes the full mathematical derivation, simulation results, and discussion of implications for complex systems.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://zenodo.org/records/18873993" rel="noopener">zenodo.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Costolo, Michael</p>
<p>This paper introduces a constraint-limited model of combinatorial growth that examines how feasibility scales with increasing system dimensionality. The framework analyzes the balance between expanding possibility spaces and constraint structures that prune feasible configurations. The model shows that when feasible configurations grow as c^n within a combinatorial space of size 2^n, the feasible fraction collapses for constant c &lt; 2. Sustained novelty generation therefore requires c(n) to approach the combinatorial base, producing a narrow “complexity corridor” between regimes of trivial repetition and combinatorial sparsity. The paper derives the analytic structure of this corridor and explores it through numerical simulations and visualizations. The results suggest a possible structural explanation for why complex systems may emerge only within a narrow range where combinatorial expansion and constraint relaxation operate at comparable scales. &nbsp;The manuscript includes the full mathematical derivation, simulation results, and discussion of implications for complex systems.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://zenodo.org/records/18873993" rel="noopener">zenodo.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62370</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stochastic–dissipative least-action framework for self-organizing biological systems, Part I: Variational rationale and Lyapunov-type behavior</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/10/stochastic-dissipative-least-action-framework-for-self-organizing-biological-systems-part-i-variational-rationale-and-lyapunov-type-behavior/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 22:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How and why do complex chemical and biological systems self-organize into ordered states far from thermodynamic equilibrium? Despite advances in thermodynamics, kinetics, and information theory, a unifying principle that links organization and efficiency across scales has remained elusive. In open systems, productive-event trajectories are conditioned on starting at a source and ending at a sink. This work proposes a stochastic–dissipative least-action triad framework in which (i) a path-ensemble weighting biases trajectories by their action cost, (ii) feedback processes sharpen this distribution, and (iii) the ensemble evolves toward a least-average-action attractor, decreasing during self-organization and increasing during decay. A parametric cross-scale metric—Average Action Efficiency (AAE)—is defined, which is inversely proportional to the average action per productive event. Under reinforcing feedback, identities derived from the exponential-family path measure show that the average action decreases and AAE rises monotonically. In future extensions, this formulation could help bridge quantum, classical, and biological regimes while remaining computationally tractable, because its empirical version relies on aggregate energetic and timing data rather than enumerating individual trajectories. AAE reaches a local maximum at a non-equilibrium steady state under fixed operational context, consistent with the present formulation, and connections to thermodynamic and informational measures are made. A companion article (Part II) details empirical estimation strategies and applications (Georgiev, 2025a).</p>
<p>Georgi Yordanov Georgiev</p>
<p>BioSystems</p>
<p>Volume 262, April 2026, 105647</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303264725002576" rel="noopener">www.sciencedirect.com</a></p>
<p><br></p>
<p>See Also: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303264725002771?dgcid=author">Part II: Empirical estimation, Average Action Efficiency, and applications to ATP synthase</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How and why do complex chemical and biological systems self-organize into ordered states far from thermodynamic equilibrium? Despite advances in thermodynamics, kinetics, and information theory, a unifying principle that links organization and efficiency across scales has remained elusive. In open systems, productive-event trajectories are conditioned on starting at a source and ending at a sink. This work proposes a stochastic–dissipative least-action triad framework in which (i) a path-ensemble weighting biases trajectories by their action cost, (ii) feedback processes sharpen this distribution, and (iii) the ensemble evolves toward a least-average-action attractor, decreasing during self-organization and increasing during decay. A parametric cross-scale metric—Average Action Efficiency (AAE)—is defined, which is inversely proportional to the average action per productive event. Under reinforcing feedback, identities derived from the exponential-family path measure show that the average action decreases and AAE rises monotonically. In future extensions, this formulation could help bridge quantum, classical, and biological regimes while remaining computationally tractable, because its empirical version relies on aggregate energetic and timing data rather than enumerating individual trajectories. AAE reaches a local maximum at a non-equilibrium steady state under fixed operational context, consistent with the present formulation, and connections to thermodynamic and informational measures are made. A companion article (Part II) details empirical estimation strategies and applications (Georgiev, 2025a).</p>
<p>Georgi Yordanov Georgiev</p>
<p>BioSystems</p>
<p>Volume 262, April 2026, 105647</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303264725002576" rel="noopener">www.sciencedirect.com</a></p>
<p></p>
<p>See Also: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303264725002771?dgcid=author">Part II: Empirical estimation, Average Action Efficiency, and applications to ATP synthase</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62367</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>BeComplex 2026 &#8211; Belgrade School on Complex Systems</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/10/becomplex-2026-belgrade-school-on-complex-systems/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 20:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/10/becomplex-2026-belgrade-school-on-complex-systems/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>21-27 June 2026 at Petnica Science Center.</p>
<p>Most of the everyday phenomena we see around us can be categorized as "complex." Such systems consist of many strongly interacting parts and yet, despite this, they exhibit a certain emergent qualitative unity which endows them with a distinct being, separate, although not independent, from that of their constituent elements.<br>These complex systems thus possess a kind of "simplicity" as well, which makes them intelligible and allows them to be studied in their own right. The sheer diversity of complex phenomena—from magnets to climate to the economy to the human brain—prevents them from being investigated under a single theoretical framework. Still, studies such as those of Lorenz and Mandelbrot in the 1970s began to reveal a surprisingly large number of common motifs across these systems, including transitions to chaos, fractal structures, pattern formation, and more.<br>The search for common features of complex systems still remains open. However, most efforts today are focused on understanding particular phenomena. The "Belgrade School of Complex Systems," organized by the Faculty of Physics at the University of Belgrade (http://www.ff.bg.ac.rs/Engleski/index_eng.html), is an attempt to bring together experts from around the world working on various fields that fall under the broad category of complex systems in order to encourage the exchange of knowledge and promote collaboration between like-minded researchers that may be working in seemingly disparate fields.</p>
<p>More at: <a target="_blank" href="https://becomplex.net/" rel="noopener">becomplex.net</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>21-27 June 2026 at Petnica Science Center.</p>
<p>Most of the everyday phenomena we see around us can be categorized as &#8220;complex.&#8221; Such systems consist of many strongly interacting parts and yet, despite this, they exhibit a certain emergent qualitative unity which endows them with a distinct being, separate, although not independent, from that of their constituent elements.<br />These complex systems thus possess a kind of &#8220;simplicity&#8221; as well, which makes them intelligible and allows them to be studied in their own right. The sheer diversity of complex phenomena—from magnets to climate to the economy to the human brain—prevents them from being investigated under a single theoretical framework. Still, studies such as those of Lorenz and Mandelbrot in the 1970s began to reveal a surprisingly large number of common motifs across these systems, including transitions to chaos, fractal structures, pattern formation, and more.<br />The search for common features of complex systems still remains open. However, most efforts today are focused on understanding particular phenomena. The &#8220;Belgrade School of Complex Systems,&#8221; organized by the Faculty of Physics at the University of Belgrade (<a href="http://www.ff.bg.ac.rs/Engleski/index_eng.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ff.bg.ac.rs/Engleski/index_eng.html</a>), is an attempt to bring together experts from around the world working on various fields that fall under the broad category of complex systems in order to encourage the exchange of knowledge and promote collaboration between like-minded researchers that may be working in seemingly disparate fields.</p>
<p>More at: <a target="_blank" href="https://becomplex.net/" rel="noopener">becomplex.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62366</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evolving self-organisation workshop @ GECCO 2026</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/10/evolving-self-organisation-workshop-gecco-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 18:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/10/evolving-self-organisation-workshop-gecco-2026/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<div>
 We are thrilled to be returning to GECCO for a second edition of the<span>&#160;</span><b><a href="https://evolving-self-organisation-workshop.github.io/gecco-2026/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Evolving Self-organisation workshop</a></b><span>&#160;</span>and are now accepting submissions!&#160;<br><br>
 <div>
  <b>Website</b>:&#160;<a href="https://evolving-self-organisation-workshop.github.io/gecco-2026/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://evolving-self-organisation-workshop.github.io/gecco-2026/</a>
 </div>
 <div>
  <b>Submission deadline</b>: March 27<br><b>Where</b>:<span>&#160;</span><a href="https://gecco-2026.sigevo.org/HomePage" target="_blank" rel="noopener">GECCO 2026</a><span>&#160;</span>is a hybrid conference, with its physical venue located in San José, Costa Rica.<br><b>When:</b><span>&#160;</span>the conference dates are July 13-17, workshops traditionally happen during the first two days with exact date announced later<br><br>
  <div>
   <b>The organizing committee<br>-------------------------------------------------------------------<br></b>Alex Mordvintsev (Google Research, Zurich)
  </div>
  <div>
   Eleni Nisioti (IT University of Copenhagen)<br>Eyvind Niklasson (Google Research, Zurich)
  </div>
  <div>
   <div>
    Ettore Randazzo (Google Research, Zurich)
   </div>
  </div>
  <div>
   Mayalen Etcheverry (Google Research, Zurich)
  </div>
  <div>
   Marcello Barylli (IT University of Copenhagen)<br>Milton Montero (IT University of Copenhagen)
  </div>
  <div>
   Sebastian RIsi (IT University of Copenhagen)
  </div>
 </div>
</div>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
 We are thrilled to be returning to GECCO for a second edition of the<span>&nbsp;</span><b><a href="https://evolving-self-organisation-workshop.github.io/gecco-2026/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Evolving Self-organisation workshop</a></b><span>&nbsp;</span>and are now accepting submissions!&nbsp;</p>
<div>
  <b>Website</b>:&nbsp;<a href="https://evolving-self-organisation-workshop.github.io/gecco-2026/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://evolving-self-organisation-workshop.github.io/gecco-2026/</a>
 </div>
<div>
  <b>Submission deadline</b>: March 27<br /><b>Where</b>:<span>&nbsp;</span><a href="https://gecco-2026.sigevo.org/HomePage" target="_blank" rel="noopener">GECCO 2026</a><span>&nbsp;</span>is a hybrid conference, with its physical venue located in San José, Costa Rica.<br /><b>When:</b><span>&nbsp;</span>the conference dates are July 13-17, workshops traditionally happen during the first two days with exact date announced later</p>
<div>
   <b>The organizing committee<br />&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br /></b>Alex Mordvintsev (Google Research, Zurich)
  </div>
<div>
   Eleni Nisioti (IT University of Copenhagen)<br />Eyvind Niklasson (Google Research, Zurich)
  </div>
<div>
<div>
    Ettore Randazzo (Google Research, Zurich)
   </div>
</p></div>
<div>
   Mayalen Etcheverry (Google Research, Zurich)
  </div>
<div>
   Marcello Barylli (IT University of Copenhagen)<br />Milton Montero (IT University of Copenhagen)
  </div>
<div>
   Sebastian RIsi (IT University of Copenhagen)
  </div>
</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62365</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bacterial sensors poised at criticality &#124; Nature Physics</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/03/01/bacterial-sensors-poised-at-criticality-nature-physics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 15:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62356</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://cxdig.files.wordpress.com/2026/03/f528845d-edb5-440a-8139-bff4dd9fc00a-1.jpg" class="aligncenter" style="width: 100%"></p>
<p>Junhua Yuan&#160;<br>Nature Physics (2026)</p>
<p>Spontaneous switching between active and inactive states in bacterial chemosensory arrays is shown to operate near a critical point. Through biologically controlled disorder, cells balance high signal gain with fast response.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-025-03160-9" rel="noopener">www.nature.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://comdig.cssociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/f528845d-edb5-440a-8139-bff4dd9fc00a-1.jpg?w=1108" class="aligncenter" style="width: 100%"></p>
<p>Junhua Yuan&nbsp;<br />Nature Physics (2026)</p>
<p>Spontaneous switching between active and inactive states in bacterial chemosensory arrays is shown to operate near a critical point. Through biologically controlled disorder, cells balance high signal gain with fast response.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-025-03160-9" rel="noopener">www.nature.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62356</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="https://comdig.cssociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/f528845d-edb5-440a-8139-bff4dd9fc00a-1.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Optimizing economic complexity</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/02/28/optimizing-economic-complexity-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 16:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62350</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Viktor Stojkoski, César A. Hidalgo</p>
<p>Research Policy Volume 55, Issue 4, May 2026, 105454</p>
<p>Efforts to apply economic complexity to identify diversification opportunities often rely on diagrams comparing the relatedness and complexity of products, technologies, or industries. Yet, the use of these diagrams, is not based on empirical or theoretical evidence supporting some notion of optimality. Here, we introduce an optimization-based framework that identifies diversification opportunities by minimizing a cost function capturing the constraints imposed by an economy's pattern of specialization. We show that the resulting portfolios often differ from those implied by relatedness–complexity diagrams, providing a target-oriented optimization layer to the economic complexity toolkit.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048733326000454" rel="noopener">www.sciencedirect.com</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viktor Stojkoski, César A. Hidalgo</p>
<p>Research Policy Volume 55, Issue 4, May 2026, 105454</p>
<p>Efforts to apply economic complexity to identify diversification opportunities often rely on diagrams comparing the relatedness and complexity of products, technologies, or industries. Yet, the use of these diagrams, is not based on empirical or theoretical evidence supporting some notion of optimality. Here, we introduce an optimization-based framework that identifies diversification opportunities by minimizing a cost function capturing the constraints imposed by an economy&#8217;s pattern of specialization. We show that the resulting portfolios often differ from those implied by relatedness–complexity diagrams, providing a target-oriented optimization layer to the economic complexity toolkit.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048733326000454" rel="noopener">www.sciencedirect.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62350</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Disproof of Large Language Model Consciousness: The Necessity of Continual Learning for Consciousness</title>
		<link>https://comdig.cssociety.org/2026/02/28/a-disproof-of-large-language-model-consciousness-the-necessity-of-continual-learning-for-consciousness/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cxdig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 15:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Papers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comdig.unam.mx/?p=62348</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Erik Hoel<br>Scientific theories of consciousness should be falsifiable and non-trivial. Recent research has given us formal tools to analyze these requirements of falsifiability and non-triviality for theories of consciousness. Surprisingly, many contemporary theories of consciousness fail to pass this bar, including theories based on causal structure but also (as I demonstrate) theories based on function. Herein, I show these requirements of falsifiability and non-triviality especially constrain the potential consciousness of contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs) because of their proximity to systems that are equivalent to LLMs in terms of input/output function; yet, for these functionally equivalent systems, there cannot be any falsifiable and non-trivial theory of consciousness that judges them conscious. This forms the basis of a disproof of contemporary LLM consciousness. I then show a positive result, which is that theories of consciousness based on (or requiring) continual learning do satisfy the stringent formal constraints for a theory of consciousness in humans. Intriguingly, this work supports a hypothesis: If continual learning is linked to consciousness in humans, the current limitations of LLMs (which do not continually learn) are intimately tied to their lack of consciousness.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12802" rel="noopener">arxiv.org</a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erik Hoel<br />Scientific theories of consciousness should be falsifiable and non-trivial. Recent research has given us formal tools to analyze these requirements of falsifiability and non-triviality for theories of consciousness. Surprisingly, many contemporary theories of consciousness fail to pass this bar, including theories based on causal structure but also (as I demonstrate) theories based on function. Herein, I show these requirements of falsifiability and non-triviality especially constrain the potential consciousness of contemporary Large Language Models (LLMs) because of their proximity to systems that are equivalent to LLMs in terms of input/output function; yet, for these functionally equivalent systems, there cannot be any falsifiable and non-trivial theory of consciousness that judges them conscious. This forms the basis of a disproof of contemporary LLM consciousness. I then show a positive result, which is that theories of consciousness based on (or requiring) continual learning do satisfy the stringent formal constraints for a theory of consciousness in humans. Intriguingly, this work supports a hypothesis: If continual learning is linked to consciousness in humans, the current limitations of LLMs (which do not continually learn) are intimately tied to their lack of consciousness.</p>
<p>Read the full article at: <a target="_blank" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12802" rel="noopener">arxiv.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">62348</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6d7ee7f86bb1d072e409bc63122d7139fdec3a58089742de36ee282edc506b0b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">cxdig</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
