<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Flex and Flash Developer - Jesse Warden dot Kizz-ohm</title>
	
	<link>http://jessewarden.com</link>
	<description>A blog on software development, technology, games &amp; movies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:52:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/comments-jessewarden" /><feedburner:info uri="comments-jessewarden" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe, Please Bring Flash Builder Up To Par by Juwal Bose</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/comments-jessewarden/~3/G7mOkGS9-Js/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Juwal Bose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=2442#comment-241975</guid>
		<description>At the end of the day Flash builder needs to be one step ahead of Flash Develop, atleast. Flash develop being free and so light weight proves that things can be achieved perfectly and among all people Adobe should be able to pull it off more perfectly.
All these are valid points. Lets see if things change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the day Flash builder needs to be one step ahead of Flash Develop, atleast. Flash develop being free and so light weight proves that things can be achieved perfectly and among all people Adobe should be able to pull it off more perfectly.<br />
All these are valid points. Lets see if things change.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/comments-jessewarden/~4/G7mOkGS9-Js" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://jessewarden.com/2010/09/adobe-please-bring-flash-builder-up-to-par.html/comment-page-1#comment-241975</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe, Please Bring Flash Builder Up To Par by Jason Langdon</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/comments-jessewarden/~3/4kYsOOujUoY/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Langdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=2442#comment-241974</guid>
		<description>I've been doing a bit of refactoring lately, and Automatic Class Importing would've helped streamline the process. My only other real gripe is the inability to change the getter/setter template that Flash Builder uses. Resorting to Eclipse Monkey for this sort of functionality is ok, but it would be nice if it was integrated directly into the software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been doing a bit of refactoring lately, and Automatic Class Importing would&#8217;ve helped streamline the process. My only other real gripe is the inability to change the getter/setter template that Flash Builder uses. Resorting to Eclipse Monkey for this sort of functionality is ok, but it would be nice if it was integrated directly into the software.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/comments-jessewarden/~4/4kYsOOujUoY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://jessewarden.com/2010/09/adobe-please-bring-flash-builder-up-to-par.html/comment-page-1#comment-241974</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe, Please Bring Flash Builder Up To Par by Mike Britton</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/comments-jessewarden/~3/3BXJvj-RdX0/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Britton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=2442#comment-241973</guid>
		<description>I agree, and have published my own personal list of things that could be improved.  The main thing is code completion.  I want FlashDevelop's code completion in Flash Builder.  It saves me hours, literally, hours of time over the course of a week.  Also, like you I don't want Flex SDK in pure AS3 projects at all.  Solid recommendations here, Jesse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, and have published my own personal list of things that could be improved.  The main thing is code completion.  I want FlashDevelop&#8217;s code completion in Flash Builder.  It saves me hours, literally, hours of time over the course of a week.  Also, like you I don&#8217;t want Flex SDK in pure AS3 projects at all.  Solid recommendations here, Jesse.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/comments-jessewarden/~4/3BXJvj-RdX0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://jessewarden.com/2010/09/adobe-please-bring-flash-builder-up-to-par.html/comment-page-1#comment-241973</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe, Please Bring Flash Builder Up To Par by Darren</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/comments-jessewarden/~3/V5jyGQ5YPMQ/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=2442#comment-241972</guid>
		<description>There's a Flex plugin for Visual Studio so no need to switch to Silverlight ;)

It's called Amethys Professional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a Flex plugin for Visual Studio so no need to switch to Silverlight <img src='http://jessewarden.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s called Amethys Professional.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/comments-jessewarden/~4/V5jyGQ5YPMQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://jessewarden.com/2010/09/adobe-please-bring-flash-builder-up-to-par.html/comment-page-1#comment-241972</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adobe, Please Bring Flash Builder Up To Par by Chris</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/comments-jessewarden/~3/7w8lOJsWi4Y/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessewarden.com/?p=2442#comment-241971</guid>
		<description>As a few folks have already mentioned, please check out  &lt;a href="http://www.elementriver.com/sourcemate" rel="nofollow"&gt;SourceMate&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href="http://www.elementriver.com/sourcemate" rel="nofollow"&gt;SourceMate&lt;/a&gt; adds a tremendous amount of features to Flash Builder.  It doesn't solve every concern on this list but our users tell us they'd never go back to just plain Flash Builder again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a few folks have already mentioned, please check out  <a href="http://www.elementriver.com/sourcemate" rel="nofollow">SourceMate</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.elementriver.com/sourcemate" rel="nofollow">SourceMate</a> adds a tremendous amount of features to Flash Builder.  It doesn&#8217;t solve every concern on this list but our users tell us they&#8217;d never go back to just plain Flash Builder again.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/comments-jessewarden/~4/7w8lOJsWi4Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://jessewarden.com/2010/09/adobe-please-bring-flash-builder-up-to-par.html/comment-page-1#comment-241971</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
