<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Balance Junkie</title>
	
	<link>http://balancejunkie.com</link>
	<description>In search of a better balance in money ... and in life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:29:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForBalanceJunkie" /><feedburner:info uri="commentsforbalancejunkie" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on Balance Junkie Joins Seeking Alpha by larry macdonald</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~3/bn9s3eNkcwE/</link>
		<dc:creator>larry macdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6807#comment-3661</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on joining SA. Be prepared for the comments to be a little more rough and tumble. And of course you can't screen or edit them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on joining SA. Be prepared for the comments to be a little more rough and tumble. And of course you can&#8217;t screen or edit them.<br />
<span class="cluv">larry macdonald´s last blog ..<a href="http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/warming-up-to-foreign-diversification/">Warming up to foreign diversification</a><span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip -1" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://balancejunkie.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~4/bn9s3eNkcwE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/31/balance-junkie-joins-seeking-alpha/comment-page-1/#comment-3661</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cash: Is It Trash or King? by 2 Cents</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~3/xoHI45Xb0IU/</link>
		<dc:creator>2 Cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-3657</guid>
		<description>You make some good points regarding Treasuries, but I still prefer cash for its simplicity and liquidity. You can get in or out of cash at any time, whereas you may need to hold short term debt instruments to maturity to avoid capital losses. Many CDs (GICs in Canada) or even high interest savings accounts pay as much or more than short term debt instruments without the fees and hassles of buying individual bonds. 

TIPS do provide great inflation protection, but the yield on some of them actually went negative yesterday due to the current deflationary fears. Again, I would rather have cash.

I do think that there is a place for bonds in every portfolio, but for safety, simplicity and liquidity, you just can't beat cash. Thanks for stopping by!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some good points regarding Treasuries, but I still prefer cash for its simplicity and liquidity. You can get in or out of cash at any time, whereas you may need to hold short term debt instruments to maturity to avoid capital losses. Many CDs (GICs in Canada) or even high interest savings accounts pay as much or more than short term debt instruments without the fees and hassles of buying individual bonds. </p>
<p>TIPS do provide great inflation protection, but the yield on some of them actually went negative yesterday due to the current deflationary fears. Again, I would rather have cash.</p>
<p>I do think that there is a place for bonds in every portfolio, but for safety, simplicity and liquidity, you just can&#8217;t beat cash. Thanks for stopping by!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~4/xoHI45Xb0IU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-3657</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cash: Is It Trash or King? by Ethan</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~3/BesV6R5pqyY/</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-3654</guid>
		<description>1. "Cash is the safest investment...FDIC...[etc.]" In the ultimate sense of the the word "safe" - that is, risk of total loss - Treasuries have the same level of backing. Of course they can temporarily lose value between purchase and maturity, but you are paid for that risk. And you have the option of full inflation protection, which you can never get with cash or any cash equivalent.

2. "If deflation is the order of the day, cash is the place to be." Treasuries aren't significantly different. Obviously they can fluctuate in value, but that is true compared to cash in all environments - it's not something that comes about because of deflation anymore than because of inflation. Owning high-quality, fixed-rate debt during deflationary periods is great. The slowdown doesn't hurt it because it's high-quality, and the fixed rate is effectively increased by the deflation.

3. "Economic slowdowns and volatility can lead investors to reduce risk by selling other asset classes, thereby driving their prices down significantly. Cash doesn’t usually experience these big swings." Ditto for high-quality, short-term debt. In fact it will often get driven up under these circumstances. Check out the Vanguard Treasury funds during the recent slowdown and volatility.

4. "If you don’t hold a decent amount of cash, you won’t be ready to buy when other asset classes get hit." Unless you were holding high-quality debt, which wouldn't get hit with those other asset classes, as above.

At a macro level it is obvious why this would be the case. If you are holding short-term, nominal Treasuries you are earning just a bit of return but your principle is going to behave nearly identically to cash. You'll still be liquid because it's not going to vary much from the equivalent cash position. If you are holding long-term, nominal Treasuries then you win when reality holds more deflation than they were priced for, and lose if it holds more inflation. If you are holding TIPS then your *real* returns will mimic the stability of the short-term nominals (low but steady real return), thought you may experience significant value fluctuations between purchase and maturity.

Any of those choices might make more sense based on the investor's situation, but short-term, nominal Treasuries are going to have a small return in virtually every environment, including deflation. Unless you can match that return in CD's, the bonds are preferable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. &#8220;Cash is the safest investment&#8230;FDIC&#8230;[etc.]&#8221; In the ultimate sense of the the word &#8220;safe&#8221; &#8211; that is, risk of total loss &#8211; Treasuries have the same level of backing. Of course they can temporarily lose value between purchase and maturity, but you are paid for that risk. And you have the option of full inflation protection, which you can never get with cash or any cash equivalent.</p>
<p>2. &#8220;If deflation is the order of the day, cash is the place to be.&#8221; Treasuries aren&#8217;t significantly different. Obviously they can fluctuate in value, but that is true compared to cash in all environments &#8211; it&#8217;s not something that comes about because of deflation anymore than because of inflation. Owning high-quality, fixed-rate debt during deflationary periods is great. The slowdown doesn&#8217;t hurt it because it&#8217;s high-quality, and the fixed rate is effectively increased by the deflation.</p>
<p>3. &#8220;Economic slowdowns and volatility can lead investors to reduce risk by selling other asset classes, thereby driving their prices down significantly. Cash doesn’t usually experience these big swings.&#8221; Ditto for high-quality, short-term debt. In fact it will often get driven up under these circumstances. Check out the Vanguard Treasury funds during the recent slowdown and volatility.</p>
<p>4. &#8220;If you don’t hold a decent amount of cash, you won’t be ready to buy when other asset classes get hit.&#8221; Unless you were holding high-quality debt, which wouldn&#8217;t get hit with those other asset classes, as above.</p>
<p>At a macro level it is obvious why this would be the case. If you are holding short-term, nominal Treasuries you are earning just a bit of return but your principle is going to behave nearly identically to cash. You&#8217;ll still be liquid because it&#8217;s not going to vary much from the equivalent cash position. If you are holding long-term, nominal Treasuries then you win when reality holds more deflation than they were priced for, and lose if it holds more inflation. If you are holding TIPS then your *real* returns will mimic the stability of the short-term nominals (low but steady real return), thought you may experience significant value fluctuations between purchase and maturity.</p>
<p>Any of those choices might make more sense based on the investor&#8217;s situation, but short-term, nominal Treasuries are going to have a small return in virtually every environment, including deflation. Unless you can match that return in CD&#8217;s, the bonds are preferable.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~4/BesV6R5pqyY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-3654</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cash: Is It Trash or King? by 2 Cents</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~3/uBzLyF--EIk/</link>
		<dc:creator>2 Cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-3645</guid>
		<description>Yeah. There's definitely no "one size fits all" strategy here, but I think we sometimes forget that reducing risk can be as easy as raising cash. Thanks Shawn! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. There&#8217;s definitely no &#8220;one size fits all&#8221; strategy here, but I think we sometimes forget that reducing risk can be as easy as raising cash. Thanks Shawn! <img src='http://balancejunkie.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~4/uBzLyF--EIk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-3645</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cash: Is It Trash or King? by Roshawn @ Watson Inc</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~3/qN5IYOd0JSs/</link>
		<dc:creator>Roshawn @ Watson Inc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-3643</guid>
		<description>Very thoughtful analysis of the merits of keeping cash in your portfolio. One's risk tolerance does seem to vary based on age and level of wealth... Good stuff 2cents!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very thoughtful analysis of the merits of keeping cash in your portfolio. One&#8217;s risk tolerance does seem to vary based on age and level of wealth&#8230; Good stuff 2cents!<br />
<span class="cluv">Roshawn @ Watson Inc´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WatsonInc/~3/VBQL-Fwdkm8/hey-broke-people-stop-overpaying-for.html">Hey Broke People- Stop Overpaying For College!</a><span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip -1" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://balancejunkie.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~4/qN5IYOd0JSs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-3643</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cash: Is It Trash or King? by Tweets that mention Cash: Is It Trash or King? | Balance Junkie -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~3/bfAsDxXKQCI/</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Cash: Is It Trash or King? | Balance Junkie -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6763#comment-3641</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by 2 Cents, 2 Cents. 2 Cents said: Cash: Is It Trash or King? http://goo.gl/fb/V3Ukd [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by 2 Cents, 2 Cents. 2 Cents said: Cash: Is It Trash or King? <a href="http://goo.gl/fb/V3Ukd" rel="nofollow">http://goo.gl/fb/V3Ukd</a> [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~4/bfAsDxXKQCI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/30/cash-is-it-trash-or-king/comment-page-1/#comment-3641</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No Respite in Diversification by Cash: Is It Trash or King? | Balance Junkie</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~3/bVyuNfD7gHA/</link>
		<dc:creator>Cash: Is It Trash or King? | Balance Junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6667#comment-3639</guid>
		<description>[...] recently wrote that these markets currently offer no respite in diversification because of the increasing correlations within and between asset classes. That’s another [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently wrote that these markets currently offer no respite in diversification because of the increasing correlations within and between asset classes. That&#8217;s another [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~4/bVyuNfD7gHA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/23/no-respite-in-diversification/comment-page-1/#comment-3639</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Commodities and Real Estate: Pros and Cons by Cash: Is It Trash or King? | Balance Junkie</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~3/g26ivntDa6Y/</link>
		<dc:creator>Cash: Is It Trash or King? | Balance Junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6741#comment-3638</guid>
		<description>[...] we looked at the current pros and cons of investing in commodities and real estate, it became quite apparent that there are some pretty good arguments on both sides of the debate. We [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we looked at the current pros and cons of investing in commodities and real estate, it became quite apparent that there are some pretty good arguments on both sides of the debate. We [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~4/g26ivntDa6Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/28/commodities-and-real-estate-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-3638</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Commodities and Real Estate: Pros and Cons by Financial Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~3/8ig1o52x5Bg/</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6741#comment-3635</guid>
		<description>[...] more? 5.Commodities and real estate are usually considered hard assets. Balance Junkie discusses Commodities and Real Estate: Pros and Cons to help us understand more about these two. 6. I watch what I eat and exercise because I am [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more? 5.Commodities and real estate are usually considered hard assets. Balance Junkie discusses Commodities and Real Estate: Pros and Cons to help us understand more about these two. 6. I watch what I eat and exercise because I am [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~4/8ig1o52x5Bg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/28/commodities-and-real-estate-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-3635</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Commodities and Real Estate: Pros and Cons by 2 Cents</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~3/eelE6zKzz4s/</link>
		<dc:creator>2 Cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://balancejunkie.com/?p=6741#comment-3603</guid>
		<description>Our real estate market and banking system are quite a bit healthier than those in many other parts of the world, but we're not immune to the global macroeconomic climate, so I think it's important for us to remain vigilant and not get too complacent.

Thanks for your comment! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our real estate market and banking system are quite a bit healthier than those in many other parts of the world, but we&#8217;re not immune to the global macroeconomic climate, so I think it&#8217;s important for us to remain vigilant and not get too complacent.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment! <img src='http://balancejunkie.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CommentsForBalanceJunkie/~4/eelE6zKzz4s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://balancejunkie.com/2010/07/28/commodities-and-real-estate-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-3603</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.669 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-07-31 07:32:09 -->
