<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Overlawyered</title>
	
	<link>http://overlawyered.com</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 18:30:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/CommentsForOverlawyered" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="commentsforoverlawyered" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on May 18 roundup by May 29 roundup - Overlawyered</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/may-18-roundup-3/comment-page-1/#comment-159928</link>
		<dc:creator>May 29 roundup - Overlawyered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 18:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=29654#comment-159928</guid>
		<description>[...] “I could have been killed for blogging.” [Patterico, Scott Greenfield] Latest blogger “swatting” (bogus police call) hits RedState’s Erick Erickson [same] Incivility is a hazard for bloggers, but fear for families’ physical safety shouldn’t be [Jonathan Adler, Amy Alkon] Dear authorities in Montgomery County, Md. and elsewhere: you should know it’s not every day Radley Balko calls for tougher law enforcement. Earlier here and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;I could have been killed for blogging.&#8221; [Patterico, Scott Greenfield] Latest blogger &#8220;swatting&#8221; (bogus police call) hits RedState&#8217;s Erick Erickson [same] Incivility is a hazard for bloggers, but fear for families&#8217; physical safety shouldn&#8217;t be [Jonathan Adler, Amy Alkon] Dear authorities in Montgomery County, Md. and elsewhere: you should know it&#8217;s not every day Radley Balko calls for tougher law enforcement. Earlier here and here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on “Texas honor student jailed for missing too much school” by Bumper</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/texas-honor-student-jailed-for-missing-too-much-school/comment-page-1/#comment-159927</link>
		<dc:creator>Bumper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 17:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=30027#comment-159927</guid>
		<description>First, this young lady may not have to work for quite a while:
       http://www.helpdianetran.com/
Second, I hope the voters of Texas recall Judge Moriarty.
Third, I hope the Republican Party throws him out.
Fourth, I hope the Texas legislature changes the law....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, this young lady may not have to work for quite a while:<br />
       <a href="http://www.helpdianetran.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.helpdianetran.com/</a><br />
Second, I hope the voters of Texas recall Judge Moriarty.<br />
Third, I hope the Republican Party throws him out.<br />
Fourth, I hope the Texas legislature changes the law&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Environment roundup by Anonymous Attorney</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/environment-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-159920</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Attorney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 16:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=30005#comment-159920</guid>
		<description>I like the jury's approach and I'm relieved they rejected the "spraying hydraulic fluid" fabrication.  I agree a non-party could never be made liable by a jury, but that's easy enough to work with:  just sustain the verdict and award the apportioned amount left over from named parties.

Sadly, the craziness of someone like Dr. Dahlgren just isn't known to the average juror, because that's not a household name.  Jurors probably assume anyone who's an "expert" doctor, approved by the court, is sound.  But it's a fun addition to the list of cross-examination questions for defense counsel on his next appearance...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the jury&#8217;s approach and I&#8217;m relieved they rejected the &#8220;spraying hydraulic fluid&#8221; fabrication.  I agree a non-party could never be made liable by a jury, but that&#8217;s easy enough to work with:  just sustain the verdict and award the apportioned amount left over from named parties.</p>
<p>Sadly, the craziness of someone like Dr. Dahlgren just isn&#8217;t known to the average juror, because that&#8217;s not a household name.  Jurors probably assume anyone who&#8217;s an &#8220;expert&#8221; doctor, approved by the court, is sound.  But it&#8217;s a fun addition to the list of cross-examination questions for defense counsel on his next appearance&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on “A trap for small business”: Welcome Baltimore Sun readers by Black Death</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/a-trap-for-small-business-welcome-baltimore-sun-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-159914</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Death</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 15:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=30116#comment-159914</guid>
		<description>Structuring laws are for the "little people."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Structuring laws are for the &#8220;little people.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple: a company with little use for Washington, D.C…. by KDP</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/apple-a-company-with-little-use-for-washington-d-c/comment-page-1/#comment-159907</link>
		<dc:creator>KDP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 14:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=30104#comment-159907</guid>
		<description>"Nice company you have there. Too bad if anything happened to it."

I have this vision of organized crime running the government. Would it be much different if we just let "actual" organized crime families run the country?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nice company you have there. Too bad if anything happened to it.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have this vision of organized crime running the government. Would it be much different if we just let &#8220;actual&#8221; organized crime families run the country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Environment roundup by Walter Olson</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/environment-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-159879</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 09:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=30005#comment-159879</guid>
		<description>BP&gt;As I read the Forbes hydraulic fluid elevator story, the jury did not presume to turn the treating doctor into a defendant and slap an award on him, it just assessed that the primary responsibility for his patient's injuries lay with a non-party to a case, and indicated through the handwritten note that they meant him. When the appeals court reviewed the verdict it disapproved the handwritten notation as tantamount to a charge of medical malpractice which should not be turned into an official finding of California courts without more due process than the doctor had been accorded as a non-party. I don't know whether the notation by itself could have gotten the doctor in some sort of disciplinary trouble with state authorities, or served as evidence in some later suit against him by the patient. My guess is that since the jury did not need to add the handwritten notation to give effect to its overall finding, the court felt it could be stricken without affecting the verdict as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BP>As I read the Forbes hydraulic fluid elevator story, the jury did not presume to turn the treating doctor into a defendant and slap an award on him, it just assessed that the primary responsibility for his patient&#8217;s injuries lay with a non-party to a case, and indicated through the handwritten note that they meant him. When the appeals court reviewed the verdict it disapproved the handwritten notation as tantamount to a charge of medical malpractice which should not be turned into an official finding of California courts without more due process than the doctor had been accorded as a non-party. I don&#8217;t know whether the notation by itself could have gotten the doctor in some sort of disciplinary trouble with state authorities, or served as evidence in some later suit against him by the patient. My guess is that since the jury did not need to add the handwritten notation to give effect to its overall finding, the court felt it could be stricken without affecting the verdict as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Environment roundup by Bill Poser</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/environment-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-159865</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Poser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 07:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=30005#comment-159865</guid>
		<description>I'm having a very hard time believing the story about the hydraulic fluid case. Surely a jury cannot award damages against a non-party - that would have to be a gross violation of due process. Does California law actually permit this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having a very hard time believing the story about the hydraulic fluid case. Surely a jury cannot award damages against a non-party &#8211; that would have to be a gross violation of due process. Does California law actually permit this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The trouble with Nicholas Kristof, cont’d by Environment roundup - Overlawyered</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/the-trouble-with-nicholas-kristof-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-159842</link>
		<dc:creator>Environment roundup - Overlawyered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 04:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=29900#comment-159842</guid>
		<description>[...] Distinguishing the areas of clear vision from the blind spots in Chicago Tribune’s flameproofing series [Coyote, earlier] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Distinguishing the areas of clear vision from the blind spots in Chicago Tribune&#8217;s flameproofing series [Coyote, earlier] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free speech roundup by Hugo S. Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/free-speech-roundup-4/comment-page-1/#comment-159824</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugo S. Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 02:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=29959#comment-159824</guid>
		<description>@gitarcarver:
Hans Bader is right that secession was about slavery.  You don't have to take his or my word for it.  Read the official explanations by seceding States themselves, starting with South Carolina:
http://sunsite.utk.edu/civil-war/reasons.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@gitarcarver:<br />
Hans Bader is right that secession was about slavery.  You don&#8217;t have to take his or my word for it.  Read the official explanations by seceding States themselves, starting with South Carolina:<br />
<a href="http://sunsite.utk.edu/civil-war/reasons.html" rel="nofollow">http://sunsite.utk.edu/civil-war/reasons.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on “Texas honor student jailed for missing too much school” by Richard Nieporent</title>
		<link>http://overlawyered.com/2012/05/texas-honor-student-jailed-for-missing-too-much-school/comment-page-1/#comment-159811</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Nieporent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=30027#comment-159811</guid>
		<description>Sorry DD, but that is just not correct. Except in the case of mandatory minimum sentences, a judge has complete discretion as to the penalty. The issue was not whether she was guilty of truancy, she was, but what the penalty would be.  There was absolutely no reason that he had to sentence her to a day in jail. In fact, he was being deliberately harsh for no other reason than he is an a**hole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry DD, but that is just not correct. Except in the case of mandatory minimum sentences, a judge has complete discretion as to the penalty. The issue was not whether she was guilty of truancy, she was, but what the penalty would be.  There was absolutely no reason that he had to sentence her to a day in jail. In fact, he was being deliberately harsh for no other reason than he is an a**hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.180 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-30 15:09:50 --><!-- Compression = gzip -->

