<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Completetosh.com, by Neil McIntosh</title>
	
	<link>http://www.completetosh.com</link>
	<description />
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 09:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/completetoshcomment" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<title>Comment on links for 2009-07-03 by REG CROWDER</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/completetoshcomment/~3/m3k9S2m1W1s/</link>
		<dc:creator>REG CROWDER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 09:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/07/03/links-for-2009-07-03/#comment-120044</guid>
		<description>On the whole I agree.

Meanwhile, if anybody is in the mood for a little plain talk on the subject of distressed debt -- and the world is full of distressed debt today -- I can offer, at no cost, "Distressed Debt Investing," as published in "Campden FB," (a magazine for millionaires and billionaires.)

The URL:

www.campdenfb.com/default.asp?title=Distresseddebtinvesting&amp;page=article.display&amp;article.id=16459

The website may ask you to register and give them your e-mail address, before it allows you to read the whole story. Go ahead and give it them. These are perfectly fine people. They won't do anything to annoy you. Their readers are mostly millionaires and billionaires, and the magazine, Campden FB, knows better than to annoy rich people.

-- REG CROWDER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the whole I agree.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, if anybody is in the mood for a little plain talk on the subject of distressed debt &#8212; and the world is full of distressed debt today &#8212; I can offer, at no cost, &#8220;Distressed Debt Investing,&#8221; as published in &#8220;Campden FB,&#8221; (a magazine for millionaires and billionaires.)</p>
<p>The URL:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.campdenfb.com/default.asp?title=Distresseddebtinvesting&amp;page=article.display&amp;article.id=16459" rel="nofollow">http://www.campdenfb.com/defau.....e.id=16459</a></p>
<p>The website may ask you to register and give them your e-mail address, before it allows you to read the whole story. Go ahead and give it them. These are perfectly fine people. They won&#8217;t do anything to annoy you. Their readers are mostly millionaires and billionaires, and the magazine, Campden FB, knows better than to annoy rich people.</p>
<p>&#8211; REG CROWDER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/07/03/links-for-2009-07-03/comment-page-1/#comment-120044</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anyone fancy a game of fantasy football? by sam</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/completetoshcomment/~3/6LH4iLAinpE/</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/?p=709#comment-119511</guid>
		<description>Here is a new fantasy game for 09/10 that incorporates video. looks pretty good!http://fantasyfootball.virginmedia.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a new fantasy game for 09/10 that incorporates video. looks pretty good!http://fantasyfootball.virginmedia.com/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2008/07/22/anyone-fancy-a-game-of-fantasy-football/comment-page-1/#comment-119511</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on links for 2007-12-18 by my blog</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/completetoshcomment/~3/UGiCyGqCWkE/</link>
		<dc:creator>my blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2007/12/18/links-for-2007-12-18/#comment-119496</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;check this out...&lt;/strong&gt;

this is mine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>check this out&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>this is mine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2007/12/18/links-for-2007-12-18/comment-page-1/#comment-119496</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on links for 2008-04-24 by TooxiaTiz</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/completetoshcomment/~3/5aTqUPONFoQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>TooxiaTiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 08:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2008/04/24/links-for-2008-04-24/#comment-117782</guid>
		<description>??,???????? ? ??????????? ???????????? 
????? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>??,???????? ? ??????????? ????????????<br />
????? <img src='http://www.completetosh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2008/04/24/links-for-2008-04-24/comment-page-1/#comment-117782</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on links for 2009-05-01 by REG CROWDER</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/completetoshcomment/~3/8v_wryWrkuQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>REG CROWDER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 13:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/05/01/links-for-2009-05-01/#comment-108451</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I get it.

Thoughtful literary cricism can be wonderful. I think I'm reasonably literate but I don't think I am required to be an expert on EVERYTHING. But I find myself reading less literary criticism because too much of it seems to be an exercise in demonstrating how clever the critic is.

I don't need that.

It just seems to me that a critic in any field, writing, creative arts, performing arts, etc., should start out wanting the creator to succeed. So, maybe one is disappointed a lot. But I think that is where it should begin.

I'm afraid it is true that in most writing, extreme histrionics can be quite entertaining.  But I wish the people who write these things would save the sharpest blades in the knife drawer for things that REALLY ARE awful. It's not as if there is a shortage of them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I get it.</p>
<p>Thoughtful literary cricism can be wonderful. I think I&#8217;m reasonably literate but I don&#8217;t think I am required to be an expert on EVERYTHING. But I find myself reading less literary criticism because too much of it seems to be an exercise in demonstrating how clever the critic is.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t need that.</p>
<p>It just seems to me that a critic in any field, writing, creative arts, performing arts, etc., should start out wanting the creator to succeed. So, maybe one is disappointed a lot. But I think that is where it should begin.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid it is true that in most writing, extreme histrionics can be quite entertaining.  But I wish the people who write these things would save the sharpest blades in the knife drawer for things that REALLY ARE awful. It&#8217;s not as if there is a shortage of them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/05/01/links-for-2009-05-01/comment-page-1/#comment-108451</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on links for 2009-04-20 by REG CROWDER</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/completetoshcomment/~3/LeLdpH_UNS4/</link>
		<dc:creator>REG CROWDER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/04/20/links-for-2009-04-20/#comment-106641</guid>
		<description>There are realistic options for funding high-quality news content that are profoundly superior to going to the government and begging for money.  I'd like to make sure the world knows there are some very real alternatives to Peter Preston's idea of an internet license fee.

Communities are key in building websites' advertiser support
By Robert Niles
Posted: 2009-04-21

http://www.ojr.org/ojr/people/robert/200904/1700/

Do we really need large organizations to do good journalism?
By Robert Niles
Posted: 2009-04-24

http://www.ojr.org/ojr/people/robert/200904/1703/

New grassroots life for investigative reporting?
By David Westphal
Posted: 2009-04-09

http://www.ojr.org/ojr/people/davidwestphal/200904/1693/

And for more, a good place to start would be the Home Page for the Knight Digital Media center, at this URL:

http://www.knightdigitalmediacenter.org/

Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are realistic options for funding high-quality news content that are profoundly superior to going to the government and begging for money.  I&#8217;d like to make sure the world knows there are some very real alternatives to Peter Preston&#8217;s idea of an internet license fee.</p>
<p>Communities are key in building websites&#8217; advertiser support<br />
By Robert Niles<br />
Posted: 2009-04-21</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ojr.org/ojr/people/robert/200904/1700/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ojr.org/ojr/people/robert/200904/1700/</a></p>
<p>Do we really need large organizations to do good journalism?<br />
By Robert Niles<br />
Posted: 2009-04-24</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ojr.org/ojr/people/robert/200904/1703/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ojr.org/ojr/people/robert/200904/1703/</a></p>
<p>New grassroots life for investigative reporting?<br />
By David Westphal<br />
Posted: 2009-04-09</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ojr.org/ojr/people/davidwestphal/200904/1693/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ojr.org/ojr/people/.....0904/1693/</a></p>
<p>And for more, a good place to start would be the Home Page for the Knight Digital Media center, at this URL:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.knightdigitalmediacenter.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.knightdigitalmediacenter.org/</a></p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/04/20/links-for-2009-04-20/comment-page-1/#comment-106641</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on links for 2009-04-20 by REG CROWDER</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/completetoshcomment/~3/41CqrKIfQ0c/</link>
		<dc:creator>REG CROWDER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/04/20/links-for-2009-04-20/#comment-105395</guid>
		<description>For me, the idea of an internet license fee is a non-starter. I have nothing against the BBC continuing to get its money. I think their shockingly Orwellian announcements warning that if you don't pay, they will hunt you down like dog, are utterly suicidal for the BBC. It just shows you how destructive it is to one's own ethical values to get money from the people by using government power. That's THEIR problem, not mine.

But I digress.

Funding news through a government tax would simply further isolate the news business from its audience. However, the concept is so out of touch with reality that I am confident it will disappear without a trace, in the blink of an eye. So, I'm not even going to bother arguing any further against it.

However, there are serious people in this world giving this whole thing some serious thought.  I recommend: "J-Schools Play Catchup" by Brian Stelter, The New York Times, April 14, 2009.

This is the URL:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/education/edlife/journ-t.html?_r=5&amp;pagewanted=all

Don't be discouraged if The New York Times asks you for a little information, before they let you read it. They're just trying to make a living. Fill out their little form, if they insist, and you can read it for free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, the idea of an internet license fee is a non-starter. I have nothing against the BBC continuing to get its money. I think their shockingly Orwellian announcements warning that if you don&#8217;t pay, they will hunt you down like dog, are utterly suicidal for the BBC. It just shows you how destructive it is to one&#8217;s own ethical values to get money from the people by using government power. That&#8217;s THEIR problem, not mine.</p>
<p>But I digress.</p>
<p>Funding news through a government tax would simply further isolate the news business from its audience. However, the concept is so out of touch with reality that I am confident it will disappear without a trace, in the blink of an eye. So, I&#8217;m not even going to bother arguing any further against it.</p>
<p>However, there are serious people in this world giving this whole thing some serious thought.  I recommend: &#8220;J-Schools Play Catchup&#8221; by Brian Stelter, The New York Times, April 14, 2009.</p>
<p>This is the URL:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/education/edlife/journ-t.html?_r=5&amp;pagewanted=all" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04.....wanted=all</a></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be discouraged if The New York Times asks you for a little information, before they let you read it. They&#8217;re just trying to make a living. Fill out their little form, if they insist, and you can read it for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/04/20/links-for-2009-04-20/comment-page-1/#comment-105395</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on links for 2009-04-20 by Armin</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/completetoshcomment/~3/nJ9nipFCO3E/</link>
		<dc:creator>Armin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/04/20/links-for-2009-04-20/#comment-104921</guid>
		<description>So who defines what is "serious, factual stuff"?

Does that exclude some of the tabloids because a lot of what they report isn't serious and even less factual? What about all the opinion pages in the papers, will they be covered?

And what about bloggers who actually do write about actual events and report about them? Do they get a slice of the cake? I regularly write about factual topics and "report" some of the things happening on Islay, does that mean I qualify even though I'm "only a blogger"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who defines what is &#8220;serious, factual stuff&#8221;?</p>
<p>Does that exclude some of the tabloids because a lot of what they report isn&#8217;t serious and even less factual? What about all the opinion pages in the papers, will they be covered?</p>
<p>And what about bloggers who actually do write about actual events and report about them? Do they get a slice of the cake? I regularly write about factual topics and &#8220;report&#8221; some of the things happening on Islay, does that mean I qualify even though I&#8217;m &#8220;only a blogger&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/04/20/links-for-2009-04-20/comment-page-1/#comment-104921</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on links for 2009-04-20 by Daily News About Celebrity : Best links of Monday, 20 April 2009 about Celebrity</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/completetoshcomment/~3/JQLb7HOzXqc/</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily News About Celebrity : Best links of Monday, 20 April 2009 about Celebrity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/04/20/links-for-2009-04-20/#comment-104903</guid>
		<description>[...] links for 2009-04-20 | Completetosh.com, by Neil McIntosh [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] links for 2009-04-20 | Completetosh.com, by Neil McIntosh [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/04/20/links-for-2009-04-20/comment-page-1/#comment-104903</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on links for 2009-04-17 by Mrs Tosh</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/completetoshcomment/~3/NduNeO0vZ1k/</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs Tosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/04/18/links-for-2009-04-17/#comment-104618</guid>
		<description>Bring back CREAMOLA FOAM.  We could feed it to baby Tosh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring back CREAMOLA FOAM.  We could feed it to baby Tosh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.completetosh.com/weblog/2009/04/18/links-for-2009-04-17/comment-page-1/#comment-104618</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
