<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Critical Legal Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="https://criticallegalthinking.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://criticallegalthinking.com/</link>
	<description>Law and the Political</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 06:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16005102</site>	<item>
		<title>New Translation of Pashukanis: The Right of Asylum and the Practice of Bourgeois Governments</title>
		<link>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/14/new-translation-of-pashukanis-the-right-of-asylum-and-the-practice-of-bourgeois-governments/</link>
					<comments>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/14/new-translation-of-pashukanis-the-right-of-asylum-and-the-practice-of-bourgeois-governments/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 06:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Translation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://criticallegalthinking.com/?p=41999</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Introductory Note by Igor Shoikhedbrod E.B. Pashukanis (1891-1937) is best known for his&#160;General Theory of Law and Marxism&#160;(1924), where he offered an original account of the genesis of the legal form under generalized conditions of capitalist commodity exchange and explained the reasons for its necessary disappearance under fully developed communism. Until recently,[1]&#160;Pashukanis’ reputation as the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/14/new-translation-of-pashukanis-the-right-of-asylum-and-the-practice-of-bourgeois-governments/">New Translation of Pashukanis: The Right of Asylum and the Practice of Bourgeois Governments</a> appeared first on <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com">Critical Legal Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/14/new-translation-of-pashukanis-the-right-of-asylum-and-the-practice-of-bourgeois-governments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">41999</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Call for Expressions of Interest: The Future of Good Decisions &#8211; Live Action Role Play</title>
		<link>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/13/call-for-expressions-of-interest-the-future-of-good-decisions-live-action-role-play/</link>
					<comments>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/13/call-for-expressions-of-interest-the-future-of-good-decisions-live-action-role-play/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connal Parsley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 07:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://criticallegalthinking.com/?p=42003</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Deadline for Expression of Interest: 24th April 2026 The Future of Good Decisions project is seeking expressions of interest for participation in a live action role play (LARP). A LARP is a form of game where participants play characters and interact to pursue goals within a fictional setting. There are no lines to learn, and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/13/call-for-expressions-of-interest-the-future-of-good-decisions-live-action-role-play/">Call for Expressions of Interest: The Future of Good Decisions &#8211; Live Action Role Play</a> appeared first on <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com">Critical Legal Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/13/call-for-expressions-of-interest-the-future-of-good-decisions-live-action-role-play/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">42003</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crimmigration and the Ontology of Guilt: On Subjectivity and the Negation of Law</title>
		<link>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/13/crimmigration-and-the-ontology-of-guilt-on-subjectivity-and-the-negation-of-law/</link>
					<comments>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/13/crimmigration-and-the-ontology-of-guilt-on-subjectivity-and-the-negation-of-law/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Viki Mladenova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 06:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://criticallegalthinking.com/?p=41994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The contemporary figure of the foreigner is not judged for what they do, but for the fact of who they are. In regimes of crimmigration, guilt no longer follows the act—it precedes it. It attaches to presence, to mobility, to the mere fact of inhabiting without prior authorization. What emerges is not simply a transformation [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/13/crimmigration-and-the-ontology-of-guilt-on-subjectivity-and-the-negation-of-law/">Crimmigration and the Ontology of Guilt: On Subjectivity and the Negation of Law</a> appeared first on <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com">Critical Legal Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/13/crimmigration-and-the-ontology-of-guilt-on-subjectivity-and-the-negation-of-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">41994</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The abuse of UK anti-terror laws to proscribe direct action protest: The case of Palestine Action </title>
		<link>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/10/the-abuse-of-uk-anti-terror-laws-to-proscribe-direct-action-protest-the-case-of-palestine-action/</link>
					<comments>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/10/the-abuse-of-uk-anti-terror-laws-to-proscribe-direct-action-protest-the-case-of-palestine-action/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Victor Kattan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 09:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://criticallegalthinking.com/?p=41989</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The 13 February 2026 decision of the High Court inHuda Ammori v Secretary of State for the Home Department&#160;that the&#160;Home Secretary’s decision&#160;to proscribe Palestine Action was unlawful, provides a fascinating insight into the abuse of UK counterterrorism laws by public authorities to stifle legitimate dissent in the longstanding struggle to end international crimes in Palestine. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/10/the-abuse-of-uk-anti-terror-laws-to-proscribe-direct-action-protest-the-case-of-palestine-action/">The abuse of UK anti-terror laws to proscribe direct action protest: The case of Palestine Action </a> appeared first on <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com">Critical Legal Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/10/the-abuse-of-uk-anti-terror-laws-to-proscribe-direct-action-protest-the-case-of-palestine-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">41989</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defending Animal Rescue as a Moral Injury to a Relational Self</title>
		<link>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/08/defending-animal-rescue-as-a-moral-injury-to-a-relational-self/</link>
					<comments>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/08/defending-animal-rescue-as-a-moral-injury-to-a-relational-self/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brianne Donaldson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 08:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://criticallegalthinking.com/?p=41981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As individuals participating in the open rescue of animals increasingly adopt strategies of civil disobedience and “voluntary prosecution,” courts are pressed to adjudicate the definition of intent itself within an anthropocentric legal structure that excludes animals from moral and juridical standing. These cases reveal the limits of existing legal categories including an animal’s right not [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/08/defending-animal-rescue-as-a-moral-injury-to-a-relational-self/">Defending Animal Rescue as a Moral Injury to a Relational Self</a> appeared first on <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com">Critical Legal Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/04/08/defending-animal-rescue-as-a-moral-injury-to-a-relational-self/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">41981</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Learning to be Surprised (Symposium)</title>
		<link>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/31/learning-to-be-surprised-symposium/</link>
					<comments>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/31/learning-to-be-surprised-symposium/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tarik Kochi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 06:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wrong of Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://criticallegalthinking.com/?p=41953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Val was a proper old-school scholar, interested in ideas for their own sake and driven to understand and respond to the injustices of the world. As a serious intellectual she was not interested in academic trends or popularity, but in working through a set of questions and problems – often with cigarette in hand. As [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/31/learning-to-be-surprised-symposium/">Learning to be Surprised (Symposium)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com">Critical Legal Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/31/learning-to-be-surprised-symposium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">41953</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Wrong of Law and Marx’s Second Secret (Symposium)</title>
		<link>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/30/the-wrong-of-law-and-marxs-second-secret-symposium/</link>
					<comments>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/30/the-wrong-of-law-and-marxs-second-secret-symposium/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iaan Reynolds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wrong of Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://criticallegalthinking.com/?p=41949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I feel honored to have been invited to comment on Valerie Kerruish’s&#160;The Wrong of Law, a book bringing a great range of methodological approaches to bear on a problematic of great interest to me. The book’s focal point is the self-seriousness of legal discourse. It is a constitutive feature of law that it ‘thinks itself [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/30/the-wrong-of-law-and-marxs-second-secret-symposium/">The Wrong of Law and Marx’s Second Secret (Symposium)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com">Critical Legal Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/30/the-wrong-of-law-and-marxs-second-secret-symposium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">41949</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surprising Law (Symposium)</title>
		<link>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/27/surprising-law/</link>
					<comments>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/27/surprising-law/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bert van Roermund]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 07:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wrong of Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://criticallegalthinking.com/?p=41944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In one of the moving tributes to Valerie Kerruish posted on&#160;Critical Legal Thinking[1]&#160;shortly after her passing away, Emilios Christidoulidis wrote that “(h)er magnum opus&#160;The Wrong of Law,&#160;which she spent the last two decades of her life writing, remains devastatingly unfinished.” Its publication[2], with so much love and care&#160;besorgt&#160;by Uwe Petersen, will not change this, except [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/27/surprising-law/">Surprising Law (Symposium)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com">Critical Legal Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/27/surprising-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">41944</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Foundational Wrong of Law (Symposium)</title>
		<link>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/26/symposium-the-wrong-of-law/</link>
					<comments>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/26/symposium-the-wrong-of-law/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 07:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wrong of Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://criticallegalthinking.com/?p=41929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Connelly There is an implicit assumption in jurisprudential reasoning that this reason, as form, is without inconsistency. Error is procedural: it results either from misrecognition of the ‘true’ law, from ignorance of the true facts, or from misapplication of the law to the facts. The practical syllogism is itself unassailable; what is wrong&#160;in&#160;the law [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/26/symposium-the-wrong-of-law/">The Foundational Wrong of Law (Symposium)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com">Critical Legal Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/26/symposium-the-wrong-of-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">41929</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Vertigo of Self-Grounding (Symposium)</title>
		<link>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/25/the-vertigo-of-self-grounding-symposium/</link>
					<comments>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/25/the-vertigo-of-self-grounding-symposium/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Esther Edelmann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 07:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wrong of Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://criticallegalthinking.com/?p=41940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There is an image by M.C. Escher in which a staircase rises in perfect geometrical order, each step aligned, each angle exact — yet the ascent loops back upon itself. The movement is continuous, coherent, even rigorous; what unsettles is not disorder but correspondence. One climbs, and finds oneself where one began. In&#160;The Wrong of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/25/the-vertigo-of-self-grounding-symposium/">The Vertigo of Self-Grounding (Symposium)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://criticallegalthinking.com">Critical Legal Thinking</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://criticallegalthinking.com/2026/03/25/the-vertigo-of-self-grounding-symposium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">41940</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
