ITP itself is an innovative graduate program with a 30 year history, and I’m excited to visit their space and meet some of its faculty and students. It’s awesome that they’re opening their doors for the month of June to let people like myself get a taste of what ITP is all about, so I jumped on the opportunity. One of many things that the program does *right* is that it empowers students to run with creative ideas for applied work and provide them with the skills necessary to realize their projects. A brief glance over their projects page reveals diverse areas of focus, ranging from video & performance, mobile computing, wearable technologies, and algorithmic art. For more insight, listen to the great segment that NPR did on ITP two weeks ago, including an interview with professor Clay Shirky.

I’m not sure what will unfold in June, but that is part of the event’s fun. I look forward to a lot of hacking, meeting new people, finally spending some time in New York, and eating delicious pizza.

I began heavily blogging not long after starting at CHNM in May 2007, and with that came many posts about my role with Omeka as well as THATCamp. In my job transition I’ve passed the baton on both projects, but I’m pleased that over the last several months they have continued to flourish. Individuals can now sign-up for Omeka.net, a hosted-version of the software which creates an installation of the software without requiring separate website hosting. Earlier this week it was also announced that THATCamp has received funding from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, which will provide significant support for the event and its regional events which are spreading everywhere. Related to the big THATCamp announcement is the hiring of Amanda French as Regional THATCamp Coordinator. Congratulations, Amanda!

So what have I been up to? Life has been a great mix of code, travel, concerts, and friends. At UMD I’m managing several grant-funded projects including software development on the Our Americas Archive Partnership with Rice University, and integration of MITH’s AXE annotation tool into Zotero to offer compatibility with the Open Annotation Collaboration. I’ll be presenting the latter development at CNI next month. I’ve also been having a great time working with Alex Quinn of the UMD Human-Computer Interaction Lab (HCIL) on a project to develop a Microsoft Surface application for a museum, which I’ll be excited to share more about in a future post.

AwesomeCamp
I’ll go ahead and declare that THATCamp 2009 was a success! Judge for yourself though, and poke around Flickr, over 3,000 tweets, the wiki, or schedule. Several campers blogged their thoughts on the event. Over the course of the upcoming year, we’ll experiment with smaller regional THATCamp unconferences, and I’m excited to see where this all goes moving forward.  I hope to see many of you back at GMU for THATCamp 2010!

As a result of the feedback we received from interested campers, Jeremy and I are planning to write an article about unconferences as a new model for academic conferences.  We’d encourage you to join our Unconferences and Academia Zotero group and crowdsource some materials that may be useful.

A Blogging Resolution
One reoccurring thought that I had during THATCamp was “I have an idea related to that” or, “I started to write a blog post on that.. but never published it.” I hope to be more transparent with my thought process, and start writing again to share ideas for feedback.  I’m not sure if it’s Twitter or my schedule that have cut into my blogging time, but I’m setting aside times to update this more often.  If you don’t already subscribe to my blog, you may want to.

Digital Humanities Caucus
Susan Garfinkel from the Library of Congress and I have started a Digital Humanities Caucus within the American Studies Association. If you’re an ASA member and interested, I encourage you to visit our caucus page and join. We’ll be sharing more details about our plans soon, but we’ll plan on a meetup or meeting during the annual ASA meeting (which will be in DC this year) in November. If you’d like to help organize, let me know..

Getting physical (computing)
I recently bought an Arduino, and although I’m not building my own robot *yet*, I have some plans to explore the use of physical computing in representing and sharing historical information.  My summer tinkering is related to the Humanist Makers reading group, which is inspired by the work of William Turkel. If anyone reading this uses arduino, let me know! I’d love to pitch around some ideas for its use.

Getting my GeoFunk on
I haven’t blogged about this yet.. in fact, Cameron blogged and mentioned my own project before I did. So here’s the short version: for the last 18 months I’ve been in love. Yes, love. With maps.  The walls of my apartment have slowly become covered with maps, and I’ve realized that this interest is going to stick.  Not only do I think there’s a lot of room for geospatial innovation for historians, but in terms of how everyday people understand and experience the past. Landscapes and place have become a serious research trajectory that I’ve been exploring (and, for whatever reason, not blogged about). Once I begin to explain where I’m coming from, it may make more sense. I promise to write a ton about this in the coming months.

Related to mapping, there are two local developments: HistoryPlot, and Mapping DC. I threw up some slides about HistoryPlot in a separate post, but I’m in the process of drafting several new posts that explain the project in greater detail. There’s also a Mapping DC meetup at 7pm this upcoming Thursday night, July 23rd 2009 at HacDC that you should come to if you’re in the area.

Summer
Did I mention that it’s summer? I’ve already taken a trip out to San Francisco for MakerFaire and Wordcamp, and I’m planning an August road trip to the Midwest to see my cute nephew.

clioweb: Teaching grant writing to #audigitalhistory class tonight. Any suggestions, or words of wisdom, from the crowd? [4:18 PM Jun 22nd] View Tweet

briancroxall: @clioweb It’s obvious, but specifics matter. The best grants I get are when I’m mostly done w/project as I can then talk specifically @ it. [4:21 PM Jun 22nd] View Tweet

nowviskie: @clioweb Assessment is more important than you think! Humanists aren’t trained for it, so get help. Also, Lisa Spiro has a good blog post. [4:33 PM Jun 22nd] View Tweet

rebel129: @clioweb Same as pitching movie/book. Need to boil down what the project is and who the audience in in the first para. Think: HIGH CONCEPT [4:35 PM Jun 22nd] View Tweet

georgeonline: @clioweb 1 Find out what most recent grant-winning projects were. 2 Ask agency if they’ll discuss your app ahead of time. #audigitalhistory [5:10 PM Jun 22nd] View Tweet

sramsay: @clioweb Follow the requested format precisely — even if it seems highly redundant. #audigitalhistory [5:17 PM Jun 22nd] View Tweet

sramsay: @clioweb It’s designed that way to facilitate the review process, and missing pieces make you look careless. #audigitalhistory [5:18 PM Jun 22nd] View Tweet

georgeonline: @clioweb 3 Much of the language you write for one grant app can be used again for others but be mindful of audience diff’s #audigitalhistory [5:27 PM Jun 22nd] View Tweet

williamjturkel: @clioweb Every bullet point in grant description should be matched by section title in your narrative [5:32 PM Jun 22nd] View Tweet

williamjturkel: @clioweb Find out what percentage granting agency wants to give for student support and budget that up front [5:33 PM Jun 22nd] View Tweet

parezcoydigo: @clioweb revise x 12, pass around to as many smart people as you can. Pay super close attention to grant description/instructions. [5:38 PM Jun 22nd] View Tweet

paregorios: @clioweb @williamjturkel is right in my experience about verbatim bullet points; clear some reviewers use a checklist approach [6:03 PM Jun 22nd] View Tweet

The day’s schedule offered a mix of traditional presentations, as well as opportunities for participants to choose their own paths. I’m a big fan of the unconference model, and I think this helped customize the event for many people there. We began with a presentation given by Jane Wells of Automattic who gave an overview of where WordPress is moving in the future. Next, I gave a presentation on ScholarPress, and Zoe Sheehan-Saldana presented on how she is using WordPress with her art and photography students. During lunch we hopped from room-to-room to hear about how WordPress is being used at CUNY, and I think the highlight of the day was Jim Groom‘s keynote in the early afternoon. Michael Cripps blogged a great overview of the day focusing on Jim’s keynote, and I was able to record video of the keynote if you’d like to watch it.

The problems and questions around tools for teaching and learning were similar to many of the other universities I’ve interacted with, but the enthusiasm at CUNY is unparalleled. Mikhail noted that this event may be a turning point for WordPress at CUNY, while Cripps notes in his blog post that given the “abysmal performance of Blackboard 8 across CUNY in Spring 2009, an open source e-portfolio platform looks a lot more viable at CUNY than it did even 4 months ago.” Beyond those problems, there are some distinct highlights at CUNY. Blogs@Baruch is a terrific example of how WordPress Multi-User can be used as a platform to provide blogging to faculty and students. At Macaulay Honors College they’re using WordPress to build E-Portfolios for students, and the latest development is the CUNY Academic Commons. The academic commons is really interesting, because they’re using BuddyPress and WordPress Multi-User to create a social network that exists across all CUNY colleges. It has the potential to radically change how the university and colleges understand their own identities.

For me, the event demonstrated that there is a distinct need for ScholarPress, and also that the WordPress Education movement is growing. It’s hard to believe that this marked the fourth WordCampEd event since November. There are really exciting things happening at CUNY, and I hope that moving forward we can grow a collaborative relationship that makes open source a viable option for universities, faculty, and students.

What will the group do?
Each week we’ll have assigned readings to discuss.  We may decide to have someone leading the discussion, or to come up with a series of questions that we’ll respond to. These details are up for grabs, and the group will decide them once we get going.

Otherwise, it’s my hope that we’ll not only be reading, but also building at the same time. What will we build? Let’s find out! Do you have to build? Certainly not, but the whole idea is to create a lower barrier of entry for those who want to give it a try — we can help each other through the learning process.  Building and reading should provide to be synergetic, and many of the readings themselves have to how to build.

When does the group meet and for how long?
The group will officially start the third week of June, and last for 8 weeks.  At this point, everything is online. People have signed up across the country, but we may organize some physical meet up, especially for the builders among us.

What will the group’s outcome be?
That is yet to be seen. I’m viewing this as a summer experiment — thinking about new ways of organizing like-minded individuals by using the web to share information. I planned to read many of these texts over the summer on my own, so the ability to share ideas with others who are also reading should prove helpful.

How can I join?
There’s currently a Google Group that everyone has joined. We’ve started out by introducing ourselves, and we’ll soon begin discussing the reading list. If you want to follow-along but not participate, that’s OK. If you’re going on vacation and can only participate for a few weeks, that’s fine as well. I’m hoping that this can be a flexible and fun way to share ideas, so don’t hesitate to join in the fun.

For updates on my progress, follow HistoryPlot on Twitter. Below are the slides I presented at the American Association for History & Computing Conference, with audio recorded this afternoon to supplement the slides.

There’s one feature of the scene that stands out in my memories — the self-described online “street teams” of local bands that would go around town hanging up posters, telling their friends about shows, and proudly wearing pins. While street teams existed before, their activities were in some ways amplified and more visible on the net. It gave fans a role in the promotion of the band, and a mutual feeling of involvement/dedication to the music. Leveraging the power of simple online tools, they were able to coordinate and promote shows, as well as create a stronger sense of community among members. The street team community grew through its online presence and promotion, and in many ways acted as a social hub for us while we were in college.

So I wonder, can you take the best features of those online street teams of the past, and apply their approaches to digital history? You already have the history enthusiasts, and the Internet isn’t going anywhere. What else do you need? What could a DIY digital history street team look like? I understand two purposes of the street teams I knew growing up: to promote the activities of the band, and to also develop a cohesive physical community. Likewise, engagement and building community are critical in public and digital history, so perhaps this is an analogy worth exploring further. In the least, it provides a point of entry for discussing grassroots and community-based, highly collaborative, DIY digital history. I get excited just thinking about it.

How can we organize digital history street teams, whose passion and local interest drives them to explore our personal pasts and share with others? What are ways that we can leverage today’s technologies to both promote and define that digital history community? While bands have a very specific purpose (to perform music), what are activities of these history enthusiasts? Can we engage casual history enthusiasts in local communities by using simple digital tools? How can these street teams grow organically?

I have some distinct ideas for how we can go about this, but before I get ahead of myself — what do you think about this idea? What are examples that you can share of activities that may already fit this vision?

National Council on Public History (Providence, RI  4/1-4/2)
I’m facilitating an Omeka workshop in Providence that introduces the software, shows examples of different types of websites created with Omeka, and discusses ways of customizing your site using plugins and themes. There’s also a CHNM sponsored workshop in June that has space for both end-users and developers/designers, so please sign up to attend.
American Association for History & Computing (Washington, DC  4/3-4/4)
I’ll be unveiling a new project that I’ve been working on called HistoryPlot. I’m really excited by the possibilities of this project, and expect to share a lot of ideas in upcoming posts.
WordCamp 2009 (San Francisco, CA  5/29-6/2)
I was fortunate to attend last year’s WordCamp 2008 in San Francisco, and after having a great time, learning a lot, and bumping into great people, I’ve decided to fly out to SF once again. Any other higher ed, history buff, omeka-using digital humanists attending? Let me know — I’ll be in the area for several days while to take a break as well as test out HistoryPlot on the west coast.
Innovations in E-Learning Symposium (Fairfax, VA 6/4-6/5)
I’ll be co-presenting with Trevor Owens on “Open Source, Extensible Platforms for Creating Collaborative Learning Communities,” which will cover Zotero, Omeka, as well as ScholarPress. I’m excited to hear Vint Cerf give the keynote.
Digital Humanities 2009 (College Park, Maryland  6/22-6/25)
I’ll be joining other CHNMers with a poster session, as well as attending sessions throughout the week. If you’re in town for this, let me know. I’m expecting this to be a pretty intense week, considering how many DH folks are in town.
The Humanities and Technology Camp (Fairfax, VA  6/26-6/27)
I’m once again co-organizing our digital humanities unconference with Jeremy Boggs and hosted at the Center for History & New Media at George Mason University. If you haven’t already applied, you have until April 1st!
National Educational Computing Conference (Washington, DC 6/28-7/1)
I’ll have a poster session with Jeremy and Trevor, and also be running a “birds of a feather” unconference-ish session on using WordPress in schools. I’ll share more details about the latter when I find them out, but I would love some help organizing the session if others are interested and available.

Now that my data is out there (as if it never was in the first place), I’d like to see my colleagues and the greater blogging community join me and release their content under Creative Commons. I’m hardly the first person to go CC, but I was surprised to find out which of my favorite blogs are licensed. It’s easy to do: you specify the types of uses of your content on CC’s License Your Work page, and you’re provided the appropriate code to embed the CC badge on your website.

I challenge you to release your blog’s content under CC, or at least justify your reason for not doing so to add to a larger discussion about licensing academic blogging content. Feel free to leave comments here, or use the #ccchallenge hash-tag on Twitter. Here’s the start of a list of bloggers whose content I’d like to see under Creative Commons: Timothy Burke, Rob MacDougall, Jeremy Boggs, Dan Cohen, Matt Gold, Mark Rice, Sterling Fluharty, and Tom Scheinfeldt. This is just the beginning of the list, really..

Props to many individuals who are way ahead of me on Creative Commons, including Stuart Geiger, Siva Vaidhyanathan, Amanda French, Jim Groom, Citizen of Somewhere Else, Dave Parry, Richard Urban, and Matt Kirschenbaum.

I hope the rest of us can catch up, soon.