<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
<channel><generator>David Emery</generator>
<title>David Emery Online</title>
<link>http://de-online.co.uk/</link>

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/DavidEmeryOnline" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="davidemeryonline" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><title>Jack White at the Forum</title>
<description>&lt;div class="centre"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidemery/6962872280/" title="Jack White at the Forum by David Emery, on Flickr"&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7237/6962872280_c36eb4f0c3_z.jpg" width="640" height="427" alt="Jack White at the Forum"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;More photos on &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidemery/sets/72157629524480856/"&gt;Flickr here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DavidEmeryOnline/~4/Ugd6AKGoFbg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<link>http://de-online.co.uk/2012/04/25/jack-white-at-the-forum</link>
<dc:creator>David Emery</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:49:05 +0100</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://de-online.co.uk/2012/04/25/jack-white-at-the-forum</guid>
</item><item><title>Retina iPad vs The Web</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Many words have already been spilled about the sheer beauty of the screen on the new iPad; whilst they seem hyperbolic, they are pretty spot on: it&amp;#8217;s amazing. The best screen I&amp;#8217;ve ever seen, easily.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;In fact, it&amp;#8217;s &lt;em&gt;too&lt;/em&gt; good.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;When the iPhone 4 came out I &amp;#8211; and many others &amp;#8211; started shunning any apps that hadn&amp;#8217;t been &amp;#8220;retina-ized&amp;#8221;, as they looked pretty rubbish in comparison with everything else on the device. The web got away ok on this front, as the screen was pretty small and most sites were being scaled down anyway (in fact, the retina display really helped with the readability of scaled down sites).&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Now, however, in comes the retina iPad and it doesn&amp;#8217;t have that luxury of scaling down sites; it has a big enough display to show sites at full resolution, and in fact the web is one of the primary uses of the device.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;And now, all of a sudden, it looks &lt;em&gt;rubbish.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Text is fine, as is anything using CSS3 properties like &lt;code&gt;border-radius&lt;/code&gt;, but any and all graphics look pretty horrible and stand out like a sore thumb in their near 8bit pixel-y glory.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Fortunately it&amp;#8217;s pretty easy to send retina-display devices (currently only iPads, iPods and iPhones, as there are no Android pixel-double devices I&amp;#8217;m aware of) different graphics using a &lt;span class="caps"&gt;CSS&lt;/span&gt; media query thusly:&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;&lt;code&gt;
@media screen and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2) {
// styles go here
}
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Combined with the &lt;code&gt;background-size&lt;/code&gt; (to scale the images by half) and some double size graphics it&amp;#8217;s not to hard, if a little bit of a pain if you&amp;#8217;ve got a graphics heavy site. There&amp;#8217;s also the obvious downside that you&amp;#8217;ve got to send double size graphics, which will mean they take up a lot more bandwidth but that can&amp;#8217;t really be helped.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;For inline images &amp;#8211; rather then &lt;span class="caps"&gt;CSS&lt;/span&gt; based graphics &amp;#8211; it&amp;#8217;s slightly trickier; you could just serve everyone double size graphics and scale them down to the right size, but that would have pretty significant bandwidth implications (although has the plus side of being easy to implement). Alternatively, you could use a bit of JS to switch graphics resources on the fly in a similar way to this &lt;a href="https://github.com/filamentgroup/Responsive-Images"&gt;Responsive Images&lt;/a&gt; script does.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;In a similar fashion I&amp;#8217;m hoping that the retina iPad is finally the kick up the backside that eMagazine creators need to switch away from packaging up a series of images as a &amp;#8220;magazine&amp;#8221;; they&amp;#8217;re already &lt;em&gt;huge&lt;/em&gt; and doubling them in size to make them retina compatible will drive most over the 1GB/issue mark, which would be ridiculous. Here&amp;#8217;s hoping they switch to something &lt;span class="caps"&gt;HTML&lt;/span&gt; based so the file sizes get significantly smaller, not even bigger&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DavidEmeryOnline/~4/5iQVMPmex-s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<link>http://de-online.co.uk/2012/03/18/retina-ipad-vs-the-web</link>
<dc:creator>David Emery</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://de-online.co.uk/2012/03/18/retina-ipad-vs-the-web</guid>
</item><item><title>Alabama Shakes at the Boston Arms</title>
<description>&lt;div class="centre"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidemery/6922781535/" title="Alabama Shakes at the Boston Arms by David Emery, on Flickr"&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7193/6922781535_aef53ed94f_z.jpg" width="640" height="427" alt="Alabama Shakes at the Boston Arms"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;More photos &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidemery/sets/72157629070680836/"&gt;on Flickr&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DavidEmeryOnline/~4/XU8CBsdXzVw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<link>http://de-online.co.uk/2012/03/06/alabama-shakes-at-the-boston-arms</link>
<dc:creator>David Emery</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://de-online.co.uk/2012/03/06/alabama-shakes-at-the-boston-arms</guid>
</item><item><title>[Link] Music apps – beyond the hype</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;From: &lt;a href="http://www.theappside.com/events-2/"&gt;http://www.theappside.com/events-2/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘Music apps – beyond the hype’ takes an in-depth look at the business realities of producing, marketing and monetising music related apps. The event features an overview of the music apps market, practical advice on how best to market your apps, instructive lessons from a variety of artist apps case studies, and a variety of speakers from across the music apps value chain.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;	&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ll be talking about the Adele mobile app at this tonight &amp;#8211; hopefully should be a pretty interesting event.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a rel="bookmark" href="http://de-online.co.uk/2012/03/06/music-apps-beyond-the-hype"&gt;&amp;bull;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DavidEmeryOnline/~4/vPimmx1Kw1k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<link>http://de-online.co.uk/2012/03/06/music-apps-beyond-the-hype</link>
<dc:creator>David Emery</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://de-online.co.uk/2012/03/06/music-apps-beyond-the-hype</guid>
</item><item><title>Grimes at White Heat</title>
<description>&lt;div class="centre"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidemery/6840351935/" title="Grimes at White Heat by David Emery, on Flickr"&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7173/6840351935_69ce9301fc_z.jpg" width="640" height="427" alt="Grimes at White Heat"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;More photos &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidemery/sets/72157629229087039/"&gt;here on Flickr&lt;/a&gt;, and if you haven&amp;#8217;t heard of Grimes listen to/download &amp;#8216;Genesis&amp;#8217; below, as she&amp;#8217;s awesome:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;&lt;iframe src="http://widgets.beggarspromo.com/genesis/widget.php" style="margin: 0; padding: 0;" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="100%" height="180" data-audio-widget-jspf="http://widgets.beggarspromo.com/genesis/jspf"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DavidEmeryOnline/~4/PDrqt_fq1e4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<link>http://de-online.co.uk/2012/02/08/grimes-at-white-heat</link>
<dc:creator>David Emery</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://de-online.co.uk/2012/02/08/grimes-at-white-heat</guid>
</item><item><title>[Link] Jack White - Love Interruption</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;From: &lt;a href="http://www.jackwhiteiii.com/"&gt;http://www.jackwhiteiii.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Love Interruption" is the first taste of Jack White's  debut album, Blunderbuss, out April 23 on Third Man Records/XL Recordings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;	&lt;p&gt;Firstly: new Jack White solo record! I am a massive White Stripes fan, so this is a Very Good Thing. Also, we made a widget for it that spins at 45rpm:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="centre"&gt;&lt;iframe src="http://widgets.beggarspromo.com/loveinterruption/widget.php" style="margin: 0; padding: 0;" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="335" height="375" data-audio-widget-jspf="http://widgets.beggarspromo.com/loveinterruption/jspf"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m not sure if I&amp;#8217;ve really mentioned the widgets we&amp;#8217;ve developed and have been using since last August &amp;#8211; they&amp;#8217;re quite nifty, if I do say so myself. They&amp;#8217;re HTML5-based and work on iPhones, iPads and other mobile devices; they get detected by the lovely &lt;a href="http://hypem.com"&gt;HypeMachine&lt;/a&gt; so they show up when bloggers post about them; they&amp;#8217;re completely fluid (using both media queries and a dab of JS) so they should work at any size; and lastly you can use them as little iOS web apps (if you have a data connection) &amp;#8211; try saving &lt;a href="http://widgets.beggarspromo.com/loveinterruption/"&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt; to your home screen for example.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a rel="bookmark" href="http://de-online.co.uk/2012/01/31/jack-white-love-interruption"&gt;&amp;bull;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DavidEmeryOnline/~4/8ebCAOShKmk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<link>http://de-online.co.uk/2012/01/31/jack-white-love-interruption</link>
<dc:creator>David Emery</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://de-online.co.uk/2012/01/31/jack-white-love-interruption</guid>
</item><item><title>[Link] Google Fuses Google+ Into Search</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;From: &lt;a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/01/10/google-fuses-google-into-search-and-there-are-bigger-changes-afoot/"&gt;http://techcrunch.com/2012/01/10/google-fuses-google-into-search-and-there-are-bigger-changes-afoot/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The short version is that Google search results are going to be automatically personalized (to a greater degree than they were already) for each user, with signals drawn from your Google+ Circles being used to highlight things your friends — or you, yourself — have shared. Any of these personalized matches will appear alongside ‘normal’ search results. And Google will also pull in photos shared on Picasa or Google+ (they’ll even show up if you’ve marked them private, but they’ll still only be visible to you).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;	&lt;p&gt;It seems like there&amp;#8217;s an ever growing opportunity for someone to come in and do search much better then Google does it, stripping it back to basics and focusing on the quality of results (which are appalling for so many search types &amp;#8211; anything product focused just leads to page upon page of retailer sites, for example).&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I think the attempt to (badly) add social features to all of their platforms could be the undoing of Google.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a rel="bookmark" href="http://de-online.co.uk/2012/01/11/google-fuses-google-into-search"&gt;&amp;bull;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DavidEmeryOnline/~4/aJJq-KuFo4c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<link>http://de-online.co.uk/2012/01/11/google-fuses-google-into-search</link>
<dc:creator>David Emery</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://de-online.co.uk/2012/01/11/google-fuses-google-into-search</guid>
</item><item><title>[Link] Willis Earl Beal - Evening's Kiss</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;From: &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;amp;v=U3xpSYTdxlA&amp;amp;gl=GB"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;amp;v=U3xpSYTdxlA&amp;amp;gl=GB&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Taken from the album Acousmatic Sorcery out in 2012 on Hot Charity/XL Recordings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;	&lt;p&gt;I love this really quite a lot. Reminds me in a strange way of early White Stripes; obviously not in terms of the music, but in terms of &lt;em&gt;atmosphere.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="videoembed"&gt;&lt;iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/U3xpSYTdxlA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;a rel="bookmark" href="http://de-online.co.uk/2012/01/11/willis-earl-beal-evening-s-kiss"&gt;&amp;bull;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DavidEmeryOnline/~4/Tz1XWSJhYU8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<link>http://de-online.co.uk/2012/01/11/willis-earl-beal-evening-s-kiss</link>
<dc:creator>David Emery</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://de-online.co.uk/2012/01/11/willis-earl-beal-evening-s-kiss</guid>
</item><item><title>2011</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;So, I think we can all agree that 2011 was quite the year, right?&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;A lot, err, &lt;em&gt;happened.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;From a personal perspective it was pretty good. Being part of the whole Adele thing was undeniably fun (if not a little bit surreal at several points), as was working another Radiohead record (although the record itself was really only a component in a larger whole). It&amp;#8217;s fair to say work dominated 2011 for me, which is both good and bad. More non-work things in 2012 would be sensible, although I think I think that every year.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;It seemed as though 2011 in general was less good for albums, and much better for single tracks. There was no great album of 2012, in my opinion. A good year for music, then, but not a great year for the long player format. I don&amp;#8217;t think that&amp;#8217;s any result of a grand &amp;#8220;the world is changing&amp;#8221; shift away from albums, more just that by pure coincidence and bad luck no one happened to make a collection of tracks that was &amp;#8220;right&amp;#8221; this year.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;So, to that end rather then do a best albums of 2011 list that probably shouldn&amp;#8217;t have a #1, I&amp;#8217;ve compiled a list of my favourite 40 tracks of the year. 40, because it turned out that&amp;#8217;s about how many I liked. It ranges about a bit genre-wise, which I think illustrates potentially illustrates a wider trend of the Internet enabling people to easily try stuff out that&amp;#8217;s not traditionally in their comfort zone.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Spotify is the reason Rihanna is on this list, basically.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;h3&gt;Best tracks of 2011&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;ul class="besttracks"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;40.&lt;/em&gt; Baby Missiles &amp;#8211; The War On Drugs&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;39.&lt;/em&gt; Georgie Ray &amp;#8211; British Sea Power&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;38.&lt;/em&gt; 212 &amp;#8211; Azealia Banks&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;37.&lt;/em&gt; A Chore &amp;#8211; Tom Vek&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;36.&lt;/em&gt; Terra Incognita &amp;#8211; Atlas Sound&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;35.&lt;/em&gt; Surgeon &amp;#8211; St. Vincent&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;34.&lt;/em&gt; Countdown &amp;#8211; Beyonce&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;33.&lt;/em&gt; The Words That Maketh Murder &amp;#8211; PJ Harvey&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;32.&lt;/em&gt; Calgary &amp;#8211; Bon Iver&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;31.&lt;/em&gt; Under Cover of Darkness &amp;#8211; The Strokes&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;30.&lt;/em&gt; New Brigade &amp;#8211; Iceage&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;29.&lt;/em&gt; Villains of the Moon &amp;#8211; Cold Cave&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;28.&lt;/em&gt; Otis &amp;#8211; Watch The Throne&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;27.&lt;/em&gt; Queen of Hearts &amp;#8211; Fucked Up&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;26.&lt;/em&gt; Jesus Fever &amp;#8211; Kurt Vile&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;25.&lt;/em&gt; Don&amp;#8217;t Sit Down &amp;#8216;Cause I&amp;#8217;ve Moved Your Chair &amp;#8211; Arctic Monkeys&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;24.&lt;/em&gt; California &amp;#8211; &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EMA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;23.&lt;/em&gt; Beat of My Drum &amp;#8211; Nicola Roberts&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;22.&lt;/em&gt; Hold On &amp;#8211; &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SBTRKT&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;21.&lt;/em&gt; Someone Like You &amp;#8211; Adele&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;20.&lt;/em&gt; Everything Goes My Way &amp;#8211; Metronomy&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;19.&lt;/em&gt; White Limo &amp;#8211; Foo Fighters&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;18.&lt;/em&gt; Headlines &amp;#8211; Drake&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;17.&lt;/em&gt; Scarlet &amp;#8211; 2:54&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;16.&lt;/em&gt; Endless Blue &amp;#8211; The Horrors&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;15.&lt;/em&gt; She &amp;#8211; Tyler, The Creator&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;14.&lt;/em&gt; Diamond Way &amp;#8211; Jeff The Brotherhood&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;13.&lt;/em&gt; Codex &amp;#8211; Radiohead&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;12.&lt;/em&gt; NY is Killing Me &amp;#8211; Gil Scott-Heron and Jamie xx&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;11.&lt;/em&gt; Dirt &amp;#8211; WU &lt;span class="caps"&gt;LYF&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;10.&lt;/em&gt; We Found Love &amp;#8211; Rihanna&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;9.&lt;/em&gt; The Wilhelm Scream &amp;#8211; James Blake&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;8.&lt;/em&gt; Rolling In The Deep (Jamie xx shuffle) &amp;#8211; Adele&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;7.&lt;/em&gt; Goshen &amp;#8211; Beirut&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;6.&lt;/em&gt; The Look &amp;#8211; Metronomy&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;5.&lt;/em&gt; Powa &amp;#8211; Tune-Yards&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;4.&lt;/em&gt; Video Games &amp;#8211; Lana Del Ray&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;3.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;span class="caps"&gt;BTSTU&lt;/span&gt; &amp;#8211; Jai Paul&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;2.&lt;/em&gt; Mozaik &amp;#8211; Zomby&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;em&gt;1.&lt;/em&gt; The Daily Mail &amp;#8211; Radiohead&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;You can listen to these tracks as a &lt;a href="http://open.spotify.com/user/davidemery/playlist/4NDTLKjqKlJi3wsSQ1uvWU"&gt;playlist on Spotify&lt;/a&gt; (if they&amp;#8217;re on there).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DavidEmeryOnline/~4/5Oxb77XUc7c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<link>http://de-online.co.uk/2012/01/03/2011</link>
<dc:creator>David Emery</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://de-online.co.uk/2012/01/03/2011</guid>
</item><item><title>[Link] How does a Pitchfork review affect an album's popularity?</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;From: &lt;a href="http://ethicsgirls.com/pitchforkeffect/"&gt;http://ethicsgirls.com/pitchforkeffect/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pitchfork is a popular-as-hell indie music blog. It's got a hipster-snobby reputation and the reviews are best summarised as "When Adjectives Attack," but their recommendations tend to be on the money and I've found a lot of good music thanks to their Best New Music category.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Pitchfork's also got a reputation of being a real tastemaker, anointing new albums &amp; artists to the big leagues. But is this backed up by the data? I decided to find out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;	&lt;p&gt;In short: they don&amp;#8217;t (although you need more data for a less flippant conclusion). Also: yay for graphs!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a rel="bookmark" href="http://de-online.co.uk/2011/12/08/how-does-a-pitchfork-review-affect-an-album-s-popularity"&gt;&amp;bull;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DavidEmeryOnline/~4/fupeofAcv30" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<link>http://de-online.co.uk/2011/12/08/how-does-a-pitchfork-review-affect-an-album-s-popularity</link>
<dc:creator>David Emery</dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://de-online.co.uk/2011/12/08/how-does-a-pitchfork-review-affect-an-album-s-popularity</guid>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

