<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:blogger='http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875</id><updated>2014-10-07T01:33:51.330-04:00</updated><category term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category term="sports"/><category term="Ethicist"/><category term="music"/><category term="movies"/><category term="contests"/><category term="linguistics"/><category term="politics"/><category term="Top 10 lists"/><category term="Debatables"/><category term="Top 5 lists"/><category term="racism"/><category term="television"/><category term="football"/><category term="history"/><category term="Bill Simmons"/><category term="NFL"/><category term="Mount Rushmore"/><category term="Mr. M"/><category term="United States"/><category term="animals"/><category term="books"/><category term="children"/><category term="entertainment"/><category term="friends"/><category term="reading"/><category term="soccer"/><category term="Barack Obama"/><category term="NBA"/><category term="anniversary"/><category term="beer"/><category term="blogs"/><category term="complainers"/><category term="fandom"/><category term="grizzly bears"/><category term="ignoring scientific realities"/><category term="science"/><category term="technology"/><category term="$"/><category term="Barguments"/><category term="God"/><category term="Halloween"/><category term="Wisconsin"/><category term="academics"/><category term="basketball"/><category term="cancer"/><category term="college"/><category term="drunkenness"/><category term="election"/><category term="existential dilemmas"/><category term="fighting for your life"/><category term="gambling"/><category term="holidays"/><category term="magic"/><category term="marriage"/><category term="news"/><category term="old people"/><category term="our crowd"/><category term="parents"/><category term="patriotism"/><category term="philosophy"/><category term="privacy freaks"/><category term="prizes"/><category term="sociology"/><category term="tipping"/><category term="British"/><category term="Europe"/><category term="Oscars"/><category term="Poochie"/><category term="Schroeder"/><category term="Super Bowl"/><category term="The New York Times"/><category term="White House"/><category term="Womyn&#39;s Studies"/><category term="accents"/><category term="advertising"/><category term="alcohol"/><category term="atheism"/><category term="awards"/><category term="bars"/><category term="capitalism"/><category term="cats"/><category term="charity"/><category term="cliches"/><category term="confusion"/><category term="conjoined twins"/><category term="covers"/><category term="deviant sex acts"/><category term="dogfighting"/><category term="drug use"/><category term="e-mail etiquette"/><category term="feats of strength"/><category term="fighting"/><category term="former lovers"/><category term="heartthrobs"/><category term="infidelity"/><category term="injury"/><category term="justice"/><category term="language pricks"/><category term="misanthropy"/><category term="names"/><category term="overrated"/><category term="pop culture"/><category term="pretzels"/><category term="quotes"/><category term="romantic philosophy"/><category term="skulls"/><category term="sleep"/><category term="soul mate"/><category term="the future"/><category term="the moon"/><category term="umpires"/><category term="underrated"/><category term="violence"/><category term="&quot;I Just Farted&quot; facial expressions"/><category term="$20"/><category term="007"/><category term="Adam Duritz"/><category term="Adolf Hitler"/><category term="Alaska"/><category term="Albert Einstein"/><category term="Alice in Chains"/><category term="Amnesty International"/><category term="Big Ten"/><category term="Brett Favre"/><category term="Bright Eyes"/><category term="CFL"/><category term="Cadbury Egg"/><category term="Charles Dickens"/><category term="Charlie Brown&#39;s rain cloud"/><category term="Chuck Norris"/><category term="Clydesdale horses"/><category term="Colbert"/><category term="Creedence Clearwater Revival"/><category term="Crescent wrench"/><category term="David Lee&#39;s chance to be Jordan-like"/><category term="Earth"/><category term="Extras"/><category term="Facebook"/><category term="Fahrenheit"/><category term="Faustian bargain"/><category term="Garfield"/><category term="George Lucas"/><category term="George W. Bush"/><category term="Golden Rule"/><category term="Green Bay Packers"/><category term="Gypsies"/><category term="HDTV"/><category term="Haiti"/><category term="Hawkinstone"/><category term="Hibel"/><category term="Ivy League"/><category term="James Bond"/><category term="Jesus"/><category term="John Ritter"/><category term="Justin Bieber"/><category term="Ken Burns"/><category term="Kenya"/><category term="Kip Pardue"/><category term="Kwanzaa"/><category term="Lindner"/><category term="Loch Ness Monster"/><category term="MLB"/><category term="Margot Kidder"/><category term="Mission Impossible"/><category term="Monica Lewinsky"/><category term="My Morning Jacket"/><category term="NHL"/><category term="Nazis"/><category term="New York City"/><category term="Noah&#39;s ark"/><category term="Occupy"/><category term="Oswald Tower"/><category term="Penn State"/><category term="Peyton Manning"/><category term="Philly"/><category term="Poochy"/><category term="President Obama"/><category term="Reddit"/><category term="Santa"/><category term="Sasquatch"/><category term="Seabass"/><category term="Star Wars"/><category term="Superman"/><category term="Supreme Court"/><category term="The Dark Ages"/><category term="The Holocaust"/><category term="The Karate Kid"/><category term="Tiger Woods"/><category term="Tivo"/><category term="Tom Brady"/><category term="Tony Romo"/><category term="Trump casinos"/><category term="VCR"/><category term="Van Morrison"/><category term="Walden gone wrong"/><category term="Woody Allen"/><category term="abortion"/><category term="action heroes"/><category term="aging soccer stars in strange sex scandals"/><category term="airlines"/><category term="algebra"/><category term="alien abuctions"/><category term="alliteration"/><category term="almost certain death"/><category term="amnesia"/><category term="anal probing"/><category term="annoying"/><category term="attractiveness"/><category term="babies"/><category term="bachelor party"/><category term="banquets"/><category term="baseball"/><category term="beards"/><category term="bench press"/><category term="best Washington Post coverage ever"/><category term="bets"/><category term="biographies"/><category term="bionic"/><category term="board games"/><category term="boring events"/><category term="bowties"/><category term="boycotts"/><category term="brain activity"/><category term="bull sharks"/><category term="bummers"/><category term="bunnies"/><category term="burning"/><category term="candy"/><category term="car crashes"/><category term="caveman lawyer"/><category term="celebrities"/><category term="centipedes"/><category term="central nervous system"/><category term="challenges"/><category term="cheating"/><category term="cities"/><category term="class warfare"/><category term="coaches"/><category term="concerts"/><category term="concession speeches"/><category term="constitutional amendment"/><category term="consumerism"/><category term="coolness"/><category term="costumes"/><category term="crazy relatives"/><category term="cufflinks"/><category term="cynicism"/><category term="debuts"/><category term="demented old aunts"/><category term="dementia"/><category term="demographer&#39;s brawl"/><category term="doctors"/><category term="dolphins"/><category term="donations"/><category term="dopplegangers"/><category term="douchiness"/><category term="dreams"/><category term="drinking"/><category term="duels"/><category term="elaborate men&#39;s hairstyles"/><category term="elves"/><category term="embodiments"/><category term="emergency vehicles"/><category term="end of times"/><category term="escaped convicts"/><category term="ethnic slurs"/><category term="euphemisms"/><category term="expertise"/><category term="fashion"/><category term="fathers"/><category term="fathers-in-law"/><category term="feuds"/><category term="food"/><category term="forced labor"/><category term="funerals"/><category term="futile attempts to increase CD sales"/><category term="genies"/><category term="genius"/><category term="global marketplace of tomorrow"/><category term="good samaritans"/><category term="guilty pleasures"/><category term="gunshots"/><category term="hangovers"/><category term="happiness"/><category term="hell"/><category term="hiding out"/><category term="home"/><category term="homosexuality"/><category term="horrific high school flashbacks"/><category term="humans"/><category term="humidity"/><category term="iPods"/><category term="if Dwyane Wade says &quot;aggressive&quot; one more time during a halftime interview I&#39;m going to lose my shit"/><category term="inanimate objects"/><category term="ingestibles"/><category term="inheritance"/><category term="innovations"/><category term="insults"/><category term="intelligence"/><category term="jazz"/><category term="jerseys"/><category term="jobs"/><category term="judges"/><category term="kids"/><category term="kids say the darndest things"/><category term="kissing"/><category term="knowledge"/><category term="legal suits"/><category term="leprechauns"/><category term="liberal tears"/><category term="libertarians"/><category term="life skills"/><category term="limbs"/><category term="limits of human endurance"/><category term="lions"/><category term="little league"/><category term="lobotomy"/><category term="lust for fat women"/><category term="major purchases"/><category term="malpractice"/><category term="manhunts"/><category term="mascots"/><category term="massage"/><category term="masturbation"/><category term="mathematics"/><category term="measurement"/><category term="mediocrity"/><category term="memories"/><category term="moose"/><category term="morality"/><category term="morbidity"/><category term="motivations"/><category term="murder"/><category term="mustaches"/><category term="mysterious friends"/><category term="national parks"/><category term="natural disasters"/><category term="newly endowed powers"/><category term="nicknames"/><category term="non-human persons"/><category term="nosy neighbors"/><category term="not being useless"/><category term="nudity"/><category term="nursing homes"/><category term="odds"/><category term="old school debatables"/><category term="opera"/><category term="ownership"/><category term="parachutes"/><category term="participatory democracies"/><category term="people who use hundred dollar words"/><category term="perception"/><category term="philosophers"/><category term="pitch dark"/><category term="plastic"/><category term="pleasures"/><category term="political prisoners"/><category term="pop music"/><category term="prison"/><category term="protests"/><category term="pumpkins"/><category term="qualitative methods"/><category term="race"/><category term="race wars"/><category term="rain"/><category term="rationality"/><category term="real estate"/><category term="referees"/><category term="refunds"/><category term="religious fanatics"/><category term="ruffled shirts"/><category term="rumors"/><category term="scandals"/><category term="scenarios potentially ending in being shot"/><category term="scholarships"/><category term="screaming children"/><category term="selling out"/><category term="sentimentality"/><category term="sheer terror"/><category term="singers"/><category term="skyscrapers"/><category term="social etiquette"/><category term="socialism"/><category term="society"/><category term="solicitations"/><category term="soul-crushing defeat"/><category term="spam"/><category term="speech"/><category term="states"/><category term="steel"/><category term="steel-toed boots"/><category term="strategery"/><category term="street urchins"/><category term="students"/><category term="stupidity"/><category term="subway"/><category term="suicide"/><category term="summer"/><category term="super gorilla"/><category term="super powers"/><category term="supergroups"/><category term="tall people"/><category term="tedious"/><category term="telephony"/><category term="teleportation"/><category term="temperature"/><category term="terrifying scenarios"/><category term="texting"/><category term="the Internet"/><category term="the National Mall"/><category term="the decline of western civilization"/><category term="the finer things"/><category term="the summer olympics"/><category term="things Jacob will have a strong opinion regarding"/><category term="time travel"/><category term="toilet seats"/><category term="tourism"/><category term="trust"/><category term="turtles"/><category term="twist endings"/><category term="undergarments"/><category term="unexpected attacks"/><category term="unfulfilled dreams"/><category term="vegans"/><category term="video games"/><category term="virginity"/><category term="voting"/><category term="white people"/><category term="wills"/><category term="word clouds"/><category term="word lust"/><category term="world suffering"/><category term="worn-out welcomes"/><category term="yard sales"/><category term="yard signs"/><title type='text'>Debatables</title><subtitle type='html'>23+ Questions About Nothing</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default?redirect=false'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>303</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-2716416433459854443</id><published>2014-03-31T07:43:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2014-03-31T21:01:36.744-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="academics"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Academia</title><content type='html'>An academic twofer this week:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;I am a public-school teacher with a limited budget for supplies. &amp;nbsp;Is it unethical to illegally download copyrighted instructional materials for use in my class?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;I am a graduate student at a state university. &amp;nbsp;One of four required texts for a course was written by the professor, and the subject matter of the text is also the content of his lectures. &amp;nbsp;A significant portion of my grade is based on a &quot;review&quot; I write of his text. &amp;nbsp;Is it ethical to require students to buy a book that you wrote? &amp;nbsp;Aren&#39;t I already paying tuition for this professor&#39;s expertise and knowledge?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 3/30/14&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/2716416433459854443/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=2716416433459854443' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/2716416433459854443'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/2716416433459854443'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2014/03/the-ethicist-academia.html' title='The Ethicist: Academia'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-1571131288621970465</id><published>2014-03-24T19:09:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2014-03-24T19:09:34.426-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="animals"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Wild Horses</title><content type='html'>&quot;Despite their romantic appeal, horses are an invasive species on this continent with few natural predators.&amp;nbsp; In the United States, it&#39;s illegal to kill a wild horse on public lands.&amp;nbsp; Yet wild horses can have destructive grazing behavior, and indigenous grazers and browsers (deer, for example) presumably have to compete with them for land.&amp;nbsp; Advocates for wild horses like to compare the ecological impact of horses with that of cattle, but that&#39;s sort of like saying we should protect the Asian long-horned beetle because it kills fewer trees than lumber mills do.&amp;nbsp; Is it unethical to protect wild horses?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 3/23/14&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/1571131288621970465/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=1571131288621970465' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/1571131288621970465'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/1571131288621970465'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2014/03/the-ethicist-wild-horses.html' title='The Ethicist: Wild Horses'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-6115738268345495126</id><published>2014-03-17T18:12:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2014-03-17T18:12:05.298-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="boycotts"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Woody Allen"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Woody</title><content type='html'>&quot;I was discussing with a friend whether it is permissible to boycott Woody Allen&#39;s films in the wake of the sexual-abuse allegations.&amp;nbsp; We both thought it would be wrong to further empower someone who may have sexually abused a child.&amp;nbsp; But our legal system is built on the principle that the accused are innocent until proved guilty, and preserving that value is important whether or not you believe the allegations.&amp;nbsp; Is it permissible in this case to boycott, or should we presume innocence?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 3/16/14&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/6115738268345495126/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=6115738268345495126' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/6115738268345495126'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/6115738268345495126'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2014/03/the-ethicist-woody.html' title='The Ethicist: Woody'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-2988154156267757348</id><published>2014-03-11T18:15:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2014-03-11T18:47:23.787-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tipping"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Tipping</title><content type='html'>&quot;My daughter works with other teenagers in the coat-check room at a recreation center.&amp;nbsp; The owner of the facility will sometimes empty their tip jar and distribute a portion of the earnings among the rest of the staff, including the kitchen.&amp;nbsp; My daughter feels as if she&#39;s being used as &#39;tip-bait.&#39;&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 3/9/14&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/2988154156267757348/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=2988154156267757348' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/2988154156267757348'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/2988154156267757348'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2014/03/the-ethicist-tipping.html' title='The Ethicist: Tipping'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-3365944748163091786</id><published>2014-03-02T21:15:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2014-03-02T21:15:01.569-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="dementia"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="nursing homes"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: In the Home</title><content type='html'>&quot;I am an advocate for nursing-home residents.&amp;nbsp; A new technique to control the wandering of dementia patients involves placing black floor mates in front of unsafe areas, such as outside exists.&amp;nbsp; Due to a fear of falling, persons with dementia will not walk on dark spaces on the floor (they tend to see them as holes).&amp;nbsp; This is an alternative to antipsychotic drugs and lockdown units.&amp;nbsp; Since this technique uses fear and a disability to guide behavior, but with the intent of safety, is it ethical?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 3/2/14&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/3365944748163091786/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=3365944748163091786' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/3365944748163091786'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/3365944748163091786'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2014/03/the-ethicist-in-home.html' title='The Ethicist: In the Home'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-6870793286558593783</id><published>2014-02-24T18:51:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2014-02-24T18:51:50.270-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Reddit"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Online Activity</title><content type='html'>&quot;I recently realized a colleague posts several times a day to the website Reddit.&amp;nbsp; If the opinions he shares on this site are about his boss or his work environment (or even reveal his political leanings), he could potentially lose his current contract and have a hard time getting a new position in our insular field.&amp;nbsp; I find this colleague to be immature and ill suited for our profession -- he seems to spend most of the day posting on Reddit -- and some of his posts have made his identity obvious to me.&amp;nbsp; Do I have an ethical obligation to tell him that this behavior could hurt his career?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 2/23/14&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/6870793286558593783/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=6870793286558593783' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/6870793286558593783'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/6870793286558593783'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-ethicist-online-activity.html' title='The Ethicist: Online Activity'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-5763638452974999605</id><published>2014-02-17T15:05:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2014-02-17T15:05:41.730-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="doctors"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="gunshots"/><title type='text'>The Ethicists: Shootout in the ER Corral</title><content type='html'>&quot;My emergency unit handled a man who had been shot in the leg in the early hours of the morning.&amp;nbsp; The trauma surgeons refused to have him transferred to the ward for wound management because they believed the victim would be pursued by his assailants, thereby posing a safety risk to staff members and patients.&amp;nbsp; The police in the E.R. declined to pat down the injured man for weapons, as they were not legally empowered to do so.&amp;nbsp; The man as retained in emergency for 12 hours.&amp;nbsp; The emergency unit, which has an open-door policy for all comers 24/7, would most likely be the first place that assailants would look for an injured man.&amp;nbsp; Are there ethical ramifications with the transfer of violent risk?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 2/16/14 </content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/5763638452974999605/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=5763638452974999605' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/5763638452974999605'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/5763638452974999605'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-ethicists-shootout-in-er-corral.html' title='The Ethicists: Shootout in the ER Corral'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-8692949782442513445</id><published>2014-02-10T15:27:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2014-02-10T15:27:52.947-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="airlines"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tipping"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: A Tip for You</title><content type='html'>&quot;When an airline loses my luggage and then locates it several days later and has someone deliver it to my home and hour and a half from the airport, am I expected to tip the delivery driver?&amp;nbsp; On the one hand, I feel as if the bag getting lost was not the delivery driver&#39;s fault and he should therefore not be punished for the airline&#39;s mistake -- but on the other hand, I am furious at the airline for the massive inconvenience caused by their mistake and don&#39;t feel that I owe anything more to anyone.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 2/9/14 &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/8692949782442513445/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=8692949782442513445' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/8692949782442513445'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/8692949782442513445'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-ethicist-tip-for-you.html' title='The Ethicist: A Tip for You'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-1194994384635784567</id><published>2014-02-03T19:05:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2014-02-03T19:05:44.473-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="advertising"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Advertising</title><content type='html'>&quot;Our subconscious beliefs, which we cannot easily understand or change, motivate many of the decisions we make.&amp;nbsp; Some companies use manipulative branding techniques that create untrue associations between their products and some deep human desires -- like sex or social status -- with the goal of having the viewer establish this connection unconsciously.&amp;nbsp; The desired result, presumably, is that the consumer will then buy the product with the misguided intent of fulfilling said advice.&amp;nbsp; Is this practice unethical?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 2/2/14&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/1194994384635784567/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=1194994384635784567' title='5 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/1194994384635784567'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/1194994384635784567'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-ethicist-advertising.html' title='The Ethicist: Advertising'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>5</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-5575578773563312457</id><published>2014-01-27T18:13:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2014-01-27T18:13:41.377-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="demented old aunts"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="wills"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: The Will</title><content type='html'>&quot;Recently, my aunt died and quite unexpectedly willed my sisters a substantial amount of money.&amp;nbsp; I received nothing (and no explanation why).&amp;nbsp; My sisters chalk it up to our aunt&#39;s dementia.&amp;nbsp; I believe that it goes much deeper.&amp;nbsp; But all of that is speculation.&amp;nbsp; Both sisters readily acknowledge that I did not deserve the snub, but they&#39;ve made no offer to share.&amp;nbsp; Should they share any of their inheritance with me?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 1/26/14&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/5575578773563312457/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=5575578773563312457' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/5575578773563312457'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/5575578773563312457'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2014/01/the-ethicist-will.html' title='The Ethicist: The Will'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-6525605541954798586</id><published>2014-01-20T21:07:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2014-01-20T21:07:54.456-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="funerals"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="infidelity"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Your Cheatin&#39; Funeral</title><content type='html'>&quot;My good friend just died.&amp;nbsp; In the last weeks of his lucidity, he told me he absolutely wanted his mistress of many years to attend his memorial service.&amp;nbsp; He relayed a few messages through me to her, as he lay dying.&amp;nbsp; His wife did well in her role as caregiver, running an in-house hospice for him.&amp;nbsp; But their marriage was -- by his account and all available evidence -- in shambles for years.&amp;nbsp; His wife knew the mistress existed, and only in the waning months of his life did my friend sever the extramarital relationship (in order to die with less complexity at home).&amp;nbsp; There will be a funeral, hosted by his family.&amp;nbsp; The dilemma: Enact the expressed will of my friend and ensure the mistress is present or -- given the wife&#39;s emotional fragility and proneness to angry outbursts -- enact my friend&#39;s constant goal of peace and simplicity for his child?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 1/19/14&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/6525605541954798586/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=6525605541954798586' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/6525605541954798586'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/6525605541954798586'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2014/01/the-ethicist-your-cheatin-funeral.html' title='The Ethicist: Your Cheatin&#39; Funeral'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-4331760495676645897</id><published>2014-01-06T18:33:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2014-01-06T18:33:36.253-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ignoring scientific realities"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="knowledge"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Nazis"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="science"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Knowledge</title><content type='html'>&quot;Some knowledge about hypothermia comes from brutal Nazi medical experiments conducted on prisoners of war.&amp;nbsp; Considering the data came from the destruction of others&#39; lives, are there ethical issues when modern-day scientists use it?&amp;nbsp; Could it be considered a form of collaboration with the Nazis?&amp;nbsp; Or does the origin of the data matter if the data is useful?&amp;nbsp; Declaring the data off-limits could lead to preventable deaths, while using the data seems cold-heartedly clinical.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 1/5/14&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/4331760495676645897/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=4331760495676645897' title='5 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/4331760495676645897'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/4331760495676645897'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2014/01/the-ethicist-knowledge.html' title='The Ethicist: Knowledge'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>5</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-6133588542555962110</id><published>2013-12-16T21:16:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2013-12-16T21:16:39.370-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ignoring scientific realities"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="science"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Activism</title><content type='html'>&quot;For my daughter&#39;s high-school biology class, the students are required to take a public action addressing climate change.&amp;nbsp; They have a wide range of options of what they can do: write a letter to a public official, design a website, develop a public-service announcement or organize a flash mob.&amp;nbsp; They are required to submit proof that they presented their work publicly -- that is, that they mailed the letter, launched the website, etc.&amp;nbsp; Is it ethical for the school to require the students to speak publicly on a specific issue?&amp;nbsp; Or even to give extra credit for doing so? Does the students&#39; right to free speech also give them not to speak publicly on this topic?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 12/15/13&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/6133588542555962110/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=6133588542555962110' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/6133588542555962110'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/6133588542555962110'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-ethicist-activism.html' title='The Ethicist: Activism'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-142186015550388408</id><published>2013-12-03T15:40:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2013-12-03T15:40:48.015-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="friends"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="politics"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: The Running Man</title><content type='html'>&quot;My friend is running for political office.&amp;nbsp; He is soliciting donations personally from friends and has asked me to contribute.&amp;nbsp; I want to support him as a friend, but I don&#39;t believe in his platform.&amp;nbsp; If I didn&#39;t know him, I wouldn&#39;t vote for him.&amp;nbsp; How do I support my friend without supporting policies I don&#39;t believe in?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 12/1/13&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/142186015550388408/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=142186015550388408' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/142186015550388408'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/142186015550388408'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-ethicist-running-man.html' title='The Ethicist: The Running Man'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-5086827786985589877</id><published>2013-11-25T17:43:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2013-11-25T17:43:19.547-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="political prisoners"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="suicide"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Feed Me, Seymour</title><content type='html'>&quot;I believe medical professionals should act ethically.&amp;nbsp; However, I&#39;m not sure it&#39;s unethical to force-feed prisoners on hunger strike.&amp;nbsp; Setting aside the issues associated with incarceration (and Guantanamo Bay in particular), is it ethical to allow a prisoner to die of starvation, even if that is his/her choice?&amp;nbsp; Or is it more ethical to force-feed them?&amp;nbsp; Most suicides are, at least in part, caused by depression or other mental-health issues.&amp;nbsp; I also realize that prisoners choosing starvation may be making a political statement, and it might be unethical to squelch their political speech.&amp;nbsp; What do you think?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 11/24/13&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/5086827786985589877/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=5086827786985589877' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/5086827786985589877'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/5086827786985589877'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-ethicist-feed-me-seymour.html' title='The Ethicist: Feed Me, Seymour'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-9009498139391806464</id><published>2013-11-18T17:47:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2013-11-18T17:47:02.808-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="sports"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Pay to Play</title><content type='html'>&quot;My granddaughter is being asked to pay more than $2,000 to be on a traveling sports team.&amp;nbsp; The coach of her high school team, who also coaches the unaffiliated traveling team, is asking for the payment as a condition of my granddaughter&#39;s participation on the regular high school squad.&amp;nbsp; Is this unethical behavior by the coach?&amp;nbsp; Is it proper for the person paying the fee (me) to bring this issue to the attention of the school system?&amp;nbsp; How do I avoid retribution by the coach against my granddaughter?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 11/17/13&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/9009498139391806464/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=9009498139391806464' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/9009498139391806464'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/9009498139391806464'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-ethicist-pay-to-play.html' title='The Ethicist: Pay to Play'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-8547260135779150167</id><published>2013-11-11T11:05:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2013-11-11T11:05:51.742-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="infidelity"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: The End of the Affair</title><content type='html'>&quot;I manage a boutique retail shop and buy my products from various local distributors.&amp;nbsp; I have never felt it wrong to steer business away from sales reps who serviced our account poorly or were too pushy or rude.&amp;nbsp; Is it wrong, however, to steer business away from a rep who has always done a very good job, and who was actually a very good friend, but who has done something that I find reprehensible?&amp;nbsp; The offense being that he cheated on his wife.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 11/10/13&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/8547260135779150167/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=8547260135779150167' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/8547260135779150167'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/8547260135779150167'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2013/11/ethicist-end-of-affair.html' title='The Ethicist: The End of the Affair'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-8365842404009578320</id><published>2013-11-07T19:45:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2013-11-07T19:45:23.393-05:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="books"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="burning"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: It Was a Pleasure to Burn</title><content type='html'>&quot;I help run a college TV network that recently held a promotional  event where we destroyed a large number of VHS tapes to celebrate an  upgrade. The tapes were all either ours (and already digitized) or  donated explicitly for the purpose of destroying them. Some people were  upset, even publicly comparing it to a book burning. Does it make sense  to see a book burning as wrong but a tape smashing as acceptable? Is  there a moral component to destroying one’s own property?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 11/1/13 &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/8365842404009578320/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=8365842404009578320' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/8365842404009578320'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/8365842404009578320'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-ethicist-it-was-pleasure-to-burn.html' title='The Ethicist: It Was a Pleasure to Burn'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-6072385675159374936</id><published>2013-10-27T22:09:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2013-10-27T22:09:14.418-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Golden Rule"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Golden Rule</title><content type='html'>&quot;The Golden Rule (usually defined as &#39;One should treat others as one would like to be treated&#39;) is attractive to people as a guiding principle for ethical conduct.&amp;nbsp; However, I feel that in our diverse, modern world, it is less than ideal.&amp;nbsp; By assuming other people should be treated the way I want to be treated, it imposes my preferences and values on those around me.&amp;nbsp; Wouldn&#39;t a better rule be &#39;One should treat others as they want to be treated&#39;?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- The Ethicist, 10/27/13&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/6072385675159374936/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=6072385675159374936' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/6072385675159374936'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/6072385675159374936'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-ethicist-golden-rule.html' title='The Ethicist: Golden Rule'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-5768004623127543238</id><published>2013-10-21T17:42:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2013-10-21T17:42:06.546-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="sleep"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="subway"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Riding the Train</title><content type='html'>&quot;Is it unethical to not rouse someone who is sleeping on the subway, and may therefore miss his or her stop?&amp;nbsp; It seems like the proper thing to do, but the person may not want to be woken up.&amp;nbsp; It could incite an altercation.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 10/20/13&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/5768004623127543238/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=5768004623127543238' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/5768004623127543238'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/5768004623127543238'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-ethicist-riding-train.html' title='The Ethicist: Riding the Train'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-8104167409961352879</id><published>2013-10-16T16:37:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2013-10-16T16:37:58.640-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="academics"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="scholarships"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Scholarships</title><content type='html'>&quot;I am applying for various graduate programs and have been looking at a merit-based scholarship for people born with severe hearing loss.&amp;nbsp; I come from a wealthy family, and my parents have assured me that they will pay for my graduate degree.&amp;nbsp; I also have very high-functioning hearing thanks to my access to expensive hearing aids and speech therapy.&amp;nbsp; Is it unethical to apply for merit-based aid, specifically one centered on a disability, when I have the means to pay for my education already?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 10/13/13&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/8104167409961352879/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=8104167409961352879' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/8104167409961352879'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/8104167409961352879'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-ethicist-scholarships.html' title='The Ethicist: Scholarships'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-4009107567495426012</id><published>2013-10-07T10:44:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2013-10-07T10:44:32.475-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cancer"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="inheritance"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Wills and Parents</title><content type='html'>I thought both of this week&#39;s questions were interesting. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;A family member died last winter and named me and my sister the heirs to his estate. In a letter accompanying the will (but not part of it), he asked us to donate several thousand dollars to certain organizations. Some of these are extremely right-wing groups, which we feel border on the fringe: paranoiac with no objectivity, with ties to militant political organizations. We feel conflicted about this - we want to honor our relative&#39;s wishes but really take offense to some of these groups.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;I was diagnosed with prostate cancer three years ago and chose not to tell my parents. I was concerned that my mother&#39;s reaction would interfere with my healing and her own well-being. Now that the cancer is gone, I finally told my parents - but instead of being happy I&#39;m alive, they were miffed that I kept it a secret. Was I wrong?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 10/6/13 &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/4009107567495426012/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=4009107567495426012' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/4009107567495426012'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/4009107567495426012'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2013/10/ethicist-wills-and-parents.html' title='The Ethicist: Wills and Parents'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-1740178579852788569</id><published>2013-09-29T17:51:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2013-09-29T17:51:04.631-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ignoring scientific realities"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="science"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Science</title><content type='html'>&quot;I frequently encounter scientific evidence misused and misinterpreted to advance ideological viewpoints. As a scientist, what is my ethical obligation to confront pseudoscience and anti-science attitudes? Is there a difference in how I should engage relatives, co-workers, or the Internet community?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 9/29/13&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/1740178579852788569/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=1740178579852788569' title='4 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/1740178579852788569'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/1740178579852788569'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-ethicist-science.html' title='The Ethicist: Science'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>4</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-4781786268862188202</id><published>2013-09-24T19:01:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2013-09-24T19:01:15.549-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="yard sales"/><title type='text'>The Ethicist: Yard Sales</title><content type='html'>&quot;Is it ethical to buy something at a yard sale or a flea market at the seller&#39;s asking price if you know the value of the item to be significantly higher than what is being asked?&amp;nbsp; Let&#39;s say, for example, someone is selling an old comic book worth thousands of dollars but asks for only a quarter because he or she does not know the true value.&amp;nbsp; Is it incumbent on the seller to do his or her research?&amp;nbsp; Is the seller does not, is it fair game?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 9/22/13&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/4781786268862188202/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=4781786268862188202' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/4781786268862188202'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/4781786268862188202'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-ethicist-yard-sales.html' title='The Ethicist: Yard Sales'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4084717284980504875.post-7416444835598956088</id><published>2013-09-15T19:07:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2013-09-15T19:07:54.198-04:00</updated><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="charity"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Chuck Klosterman"/><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ethicist"/><title type='text'>Ethicist: Paint Your Wagon</title><content type='html'>&quot;A local charity frequently leaves a flier on my door advising that a crew will be in my neighborhood painting house numbers on the curb.&amp;nbsp; The fliers stress that this can help emergency services find my house.&amp;nbsp; It also states that the painters are &quot;licensed by the city,&quot; suggesting some official sanction to their work.&amp;nbsp; It requests that if I do not want the paint job, it is my responsibility to tape a notice to the curb.&amp;nbsp; What obligation do I have to pay if I don&#39;t opt out and the curb is painted anyway?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: xx-small;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;-- From The Ethicist, 9/15/13&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/feeds/7416444835598956088/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4084717284980504875&amp;postID=7416444835598956088' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/7416444835598956088'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4084717284980504875/posts/default/7416444835598956088'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://debatables.blogspot.com/2013/09/ethicist-paint-your-wagon.html' title='Ethicist: Paint Your Wagon'/><author><name>Marls</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry></feed>