<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Dickinson Mackaman Tyler &amp; Hagen PC » Iowa Banking Law Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com</link>
	<description>Des Moines, Iowa Law Firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:54:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.1.1" -->

	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/dickinson-law-iowa-banking-law-blog" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="dickinson-law-iowa-banking-law-blog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">dickinson-law-iowa-banking-law-blog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Significantly insignificant: The United States Supreme Court decides agencies decide what agencies can decide</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Arlington v. FCC thus represents an important test of how far courts are willing to extend deference to agencies.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2013/05/significantly-insignificant-the-united-states-supreme-court-decides-agencies-decide-what-agencies-can-decide/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Supreme Court and the CFPB: A test of executive power</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice is asking the Supreme Court to decide a case that will have important ramifications for the validity of CFPB rules. ]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2013/05/the-supreme-court-and-the-cfpb-a-test-of-executive-power/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Foreclosing banks and attorneys beware!</title>
		<description><![CDATA[all real estate lending institutions in the state of Iowa should take particular note of the recent Court of Appeals case of First Iowa State Bank vs. Ronnie L. Hammond.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2013/05/foreclosing-banks-and-attorneys-beware/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>“Enough is enough”</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Courts will uphold agency interpretations of agency rules even if it is not the best understanding of the rule. The agency interpretation only needs to be plausible. At least one Supreme Court Justice is ready to change this deference.
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2013/04/enough-is-enough/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Against this background . . .</title>
		<description><![CDATA[In recent months, we’ve noticed a substantial increase in the number of Section 19 waiver actions on the FDIC’s monthly enforcement actions.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2013/04/against-this-background/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>BYOD (“Bring Your Own Device”) – What Is It and Why Employers Should Care</title>
		<description><![CDATA[We all have one – at least almost everybody.  Learn how to best protect your company's confidential and proprietary information.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2013/04/byod-bring-your-own-device-what-is-it-and-why-employers-should-care/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Cybersecurity Executive Order Signed By President</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The long-awaited Cybersecurity Executive Order was signed by President Obama.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2013/02/cybersecurity-executive-order-signed-by-president/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Not so fast CFPB: Federal Court ruling calls President’s recess appointment of Richard Cordray into question</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today, a unanimous panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that President Obama’s recess appointment of three Members of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) is invalid. The basis of the ruling is that the United States Senate, which must give its “advice and consent” to certain nominees, was not [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2013/01/not-so-fast-cfpb-federal-court-ruling-calls-presidents-recess-appointment-of-richard-cordray-into-question/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Make sure your wire transfer agreements are wired properly</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Banks can be held responsible for fraudulent wire transfers if they do not comply with the UCC.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2013/01/make-sure-your-wire-transfer-agreements-are-wired-properly/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>What’s in a name? Banks need to pay close attention to the names they list on UCC financing statements</title>
		<description><![CDATA[In order for a bank to ensure that it has a properly filed a UCC financing statement, it needs to include the exact full legal name of the debtor.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2013/01/whats-in-a-name-banks-need-to-pay-close-attention-to-the-names-they-list-on-ucc-financing-statements/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
