<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Dickinson Mackaman Tyler &amp; Hagen PC » Iowa Employer Law Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com</link>
	<description>Des Moines, Iowa Law Firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 17:33:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.1.1" -->

	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/dickinson-law-iowa-employer-law-blog" /><feedburner:info uri="dickinson-law-iowa-employer-law-blog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>Bridget Penick named secretary of the Polk County Bar Association</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Dickinson attorney Bridget Penick appointed secretary of the Polk County Bar Association]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2012/05/bridget-penick-elected-secretary-of-the-polk-county-bar-association/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>New EEOC enforcement guidance on arrests and convictions in employment decisions: Targeted Screens and Individualized Assessments</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Targeted Screens and Individualized Assessments represent one of the methods employers can use to rebut evidence that may arise out of the use of arrest and conviction records—and the most likely method employers will use. 
]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2012/05/new-eeoc-enforcement-guidance-on-arrests-and-convictions-in-employment-decisions-targeted-screens-and-individualized-assessments/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Analysis of the new EEOC enforcement guidance on the use of arrests and convictions in employment decisions</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The EEOC has a long-standing interest under Title VII in preventing both disparate treatment and disparate impact discrimination.  Here's why you need to turn your system for handling criminal records inside-out.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2012/05/analysis-of-the-new-eeoc-enforcement-guidance-on-the-use-of-arrests-and-convictions-in-employment-decisions/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>New EEOC enforcement guidance: A to-do list for revamping the handling of arrests, convictions, and criminal background checks</title>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 25, 2012, the EEOC issued an updated Enforcement Guidance (EG) titled “Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions Under Title VII.”  The new EG focuses on preventing employment discrimination based on race and national origin.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2012/05/new-eeoc-enforcement-guidance-a-to-do-list-for-revamping-the-handling-of-arrests-convictions-and-criminal-background-checks/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Federal court sides with employer on OSHA statute of limitations issue</title>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recently decided case, AKM LLC, d.b.a Volks Constructors v. Secretary of Labor, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sided with the employer on the issue of whether OSHA’s record keeping requirement and five year regulatory retention period allows OSHA to disregard the Act’s six month statute of limitations period.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2012/04/federal-court-sides-with-employer-on-osha-statute-of-limitations-issue/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Employer’s award of attorney fees reversed by Eighth Circuit in Iowa sexual harassment case</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The Eighth Circuit reversed a decision by a federal judge in the Northern District of Iowa to award attorney fees and costs to the defendant-employer in EEOC v. CRST Van Expedited, Inc. following a series of rulings which effectively dismissed sexual harassment claims brought by the EEOC on behalf of 270 women. ]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2012/03/employers-award-of-attorney-fees-reversed-by-eighth-circuit-in-iowa-sexual-harassment-case/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Finding commonality: The lessons of Dukes for class litigation</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes, “one of the most expansive class actions ever,” is important to examine because it represents a comprehensive analysis of the “commonality” and “predominance” standards in Rule 23 and because arbitration rules incorporate both the “commonality” and “predominance” standards found in Rule 23.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2012/03/finding-commonality-the-lessons-of-dukes-for-class-litigation/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Court upholds NLRB poster rule, finds some enforcement rules invalid, and rejects attempts to add a challenge to recess appointments</title>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal district court judge in Washington, D.C., ruled today that the NLRB acted within the scope of its authority under the National Labor Relations Act in promulgating “Subpart A” of a Final Rule entitled “Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act.” ]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2012/03/court-upholds-nlrb-poster-rule/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Employer claims “gross misconduct” exception after being sued for failure to send proper COBRA notices</title>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the definition of “gross misconduct” that would justify not providing a soon-to-be-fired individual with the right to continue to participate at his or her own cost in an employer’s group health insurance plans through COBRA?  ]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2012/02/case-involving-denial-of-cobra-continuation-due-to-gross-misconduct-offers-lessons-for-iowa-employers/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Short extension to comment on proposed affirmative action requirements for disabled workers</title>
		<description><![CDATA[On the day that comments were due on proposed regulations beefing up affirmative action requirements for disabled workers, the Office of Federal Contracts Compliance Programs of the U.S. Department of Labor announced a short extension of the deadline.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2012/02/short-extension-to-comment-period-for-proposed-affirmative-action-requirements-for-disabled-workers/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

