<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Dickinson Mackaman Tyler &amp; Hagen PC » Iowa Real Estate &amp; Land Use Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com</link>
	<description>Des Moines, Iowa Law Firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:27:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.1.1" -->

	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/dickinson-law-iowa-real-estate-blog" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="dickinson-law-iowa-real-estate-blog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">dickinson-law-iowa-real-estate-blog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Digging the gold out of family farm corporations</title>
		<description><![CDATA[During the 1970s, many farm operations were incorporated for succession planning purposes. Today, the number of corporations that own Iowa farmland has soared.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2012/07/digging-the-gold-out-of-family-farm-corporations/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>No respite from RESPA? Why banks may face increased civil litigation</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Lost in Thursday’s coverage of the United States Supreme Court’s decision regarding the Affordable Care Act was the Court’s action regarding another important constitutional issue. The Court dismissed, without a decision or opinion, the case First American Corp. v. Edwards. ]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2012/06/no-respite-from-respa-why-banks-may-face-increased-civil-ligitigation/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>“RESPA” doesn’t prohibit the collection of unearned settlement fees, Supreme Court says</title>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court determines that "RESPA" does not prohibit the collection of unearned settlement fees, but merely prohibits any splitting of said fees.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2012/06/respa-doesnt-prohibit-the-collection-of-unearned-settlement-fees-supreme-court-says/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Court upholds twenty-one year limit on restrictive covenants; denies homeowners’ association the right to levy assessment</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The Iowa Court of Appeals recently denied a homeowners' association the right to levy assessments for common area maintenance and repair because the covenants creating the right to do so were over twenty-one years old. ]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2012/03/court-upholds-twenty-one-year-limit-on-restrictive-covenants-denies-homeowners-association-the-right-to-levy-assessment/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>In Sackett v. EPA, the U.S. Supreme Court hears case involving property owners’ rights</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Sackett v. EPA, which in its simplest form pits individual residential landowners against the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) in a battle over some Idaho dirt. The battle involves a complicated statutory scheme of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) which protects wetlands from development.]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2012/01/u-s-supreme-court-hears-case-involving-rights-of-property-owners/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The sale-leaseback scenario</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The “sale-leaseback” concept is not a new one, but it is one that is being utilized more and more in today’s economic climate as the financial and tax benefits can be numerous for both parties.  In its simplest form, a sale-leaseback is a transaction in which the owner of property sells the property and simultaneously leases it back from the purchaser. ]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2011/08/the-sale-leaseback-scenario/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The un-neighborly neighbor: A recent private condemnation case</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Green v. Wilderness Ridge, LLC, a recent Iowa Court of Appeals case, involved a private condemnation action brought under Iowa Code Section 6A.4(2). Said code section provides for a private right of condemnation where property is not otherwise accessible by a public roadway, but requires the selection of the “nearest feasible route” in doing so. ]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2011/06/the-un-neighborly-neighbor-a-recent-private-condemnation-case/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>An unwanted “benefit” and bill: A recent special assessment case</title>
		<description><![CDATA[In Gray v. City of Indianola (May 6, 2011), the Iowa Supreme Court examined the fairness of special assessments levied upon certain property owners.  The district court had found that the property owners had been assessed in excess of the special benefits received from the project and reduced the assessments. ]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2011/06/an-unwanted-benefit-and-bill-a-recent-special-assessment-case/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Builders beware: Home construction contracts are afforded consumer fraud protections</title>
		<description><![CDATA[In Scenic Builders vs. Peiffer and Peiffer, the Iowa Court of Appeals recently was presented with the issue of whether contracts for the construction of personal residences are deemed “consumer merchandise” as contemplated under Iowa’s consumer fraud act. ]]></description>
		<link>http://www.dickinsonlaw.com/2011/05/builders-beware-home-construction-contracts-are-afforded-consumer-fraud-protections/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
