Romney and Obama are as one

Obama and Romney sitting in a tree k-i-s-s-i-n-g.

I’m just curious why we don’t hear feminist groups cry out about the abuse against innocent daughters.

h/t to act for australia

CAIR tweeted this morning that there is “No Contradictions Between the Koran and the US Constitution!” Really?  Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf last year attempted to convince an audience that the United States is a Sharia compliant state. These two statements baffled me for two reasons:

1. If America was a Shari’a compliant state then why don’t Islamic controlled governments in the Middle East have a republic like the United States?
2. If the Koran and the US Constitution are similar in rights and freedoms then why don’t  Islamic controlled governments preserve religious freedom so that a grown and expanding Christian church can exist down the block from a Mosque in Pakistan?

First here is the video I created from mam Feisal Abdul Rauf talk about Sharia and compliant America. CAUTION: It’s a little graphic!

The Fiqh Council of North America, or FCNA ”stated that the religion of Islam and the American Constitution share no inherent contradictions.” The objective of the show ”The All-American Muslim” was to show “several Muslim families living their lives as Muslim and as Americans, struggling to reconcile their faith’s commandments with the constraints of temporal demands. Americans have been diagnosed by FCNA as Islamophobic because they think  ”that Muslims’ loyalty to their faith makes them untrustworthy Americans.”

Let’s address these statements.

No difference between Koran and US Constitution:

In the simplest terms the US Constitution reflects what a normal person thinks of himself. That is the right to live his life as he sees fit and not to be burdened by another’s life. Rights such as Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression, Trials that are Fair and Just, Freedom from Slavery, and the elimination of Poll taxes. All of these basic rights that are guaranteed in the United States simply do not exist in a country run by Muslims. If there is please name one.

If you are a Christian in a Muslim Country then you are labeled under Dhimmitude which means that if you are not a Muslim then you are second class. In addition taxes are used to hinder anyone who’s not a Muslim. Also, Islam is a religion that you are born into and to leave it is worthy of death in Islamic countries. You may become a Christian but you’re going to have to pay for it. Also, Christians cannot openly evangelize in Muslim Countries? Where is the freedom to express your own religion that is protected in the US Constitution? There isn’t. In fact, I can guarantee that if I fly over and build a Christian Church that looks like a Mosque in Pakistan I won’t be coming back.

In addition, the US Constitution insures that men and women are equal in the sight of the law. This is just not the case under an Islamic government. Women are seen as property. They can’t vote and they can’t express themselves as they see fit. They are not viewed as credible witnesses in the eyes of the law during trial.

I would love for a Muslim to present line by line case where the Koran protects the rights of individuals as does the US Constitution. This isn’t going to happen because the end goal of Islamic teaching is for all governments of the world be under the hand of Islam.

Reconcile Islamic faith and temporal demands:

It’s strange that they even bring this up. If the Koran, the basis of Islamic faith, is similar to the rights of the US then why would there be a struggle between Islamic faith and temporal demands? What temporal demands are they speaking about? Is it sex? Well every other teenager of every religion and creed struggles with this. What temporal demand are “Muslim” families struggling with that is unique to only them? Are Muslims a deficient class of people that have special struggles that no one else in America deal with?

What is it then? Well, maybe its the fact that the Koran teaches that society must be forced to bow to Islam. Why do I say forced? It’s because the Koran says in Sura 61:9:

It is He Who has sent His Messenger forth with the guidance and the religion of truth, to make it triumph over every religion, even though the idolaters may be averse. (An Interpretation of the Quran, New York: NYUP, 2004)

Moving on:

First a phobia is a “persistent fear of an object or situation in which the sufferer commits to great lengths in avoiding, typically disproportional to the actual danger posed, often being recognized as irrational. Question: How many American go out of their way to avoid Muslims? How many American think that every Muslim is a suicide bomber? How many Americans really think that Muslim fathers are going to kill their daughters for being more Western? The questions can go on and on.

Most Americans are not scared of Muslims. However, If someone says they are a Muslim and the goal of Islam is world domination then what is the normal person to think?

What are your thoughts?

It’s official the Hijab is the quickest way for Muslim women to get cash and not work in America. That’s right. Interview for an American job and if you’re not hired then scream:

“It’s because of the Hijab!”

Well that’s what happened to Abercrombie & Fitch. It’s claimed that Abercrombie “discriminated against an observant Muslim woman because she wore a hijab.(1) ” WAIT A MINUTE! You mean to tell me that an “observant Muslim” who thought it would be respectful to Islam to work for a company that got busted by the media because their catalogues were equated to soft porn in 2003? But that is beside the point because the law doesn’t care how devoted someone is to “their faith.”

Abercrombie said that the Hijab wasn’t in accordance to their look of their Brand. Their brand is what makes them money. In a sense the brand of Abercrombie is their business. The teenagers and those early twenty year olds want to look good naked and they feel that they will look good naked if they wear Abercrombie clothes. How does a Hijab help the Abercrombie brand? Do women feel they will look good naked if they wear a Hijab? In fact it doesn’t. If it helped the brand then various styles and colors of Hijabs would be sold to the Abercrombie consumer. But they’re not.

Well the court determined that there was a $20,000 loss of income to this lady because Abercrombie did not show “significant undue hardship if it had made an accommodation” for her.  Well, I have a question. What if I had a religious adversity to taking a bath and as a result customers didn’t want to buy from me and as a result there was a lose of profit to the store. I was able to do my “job” without reservation and I abided by all the rules, regulations, and requirements of the job. Should I not be fired if I don’t do something about my body odor?

So what does this mean? It mean that “muslim” women can go for job interviews wearing their hijab and when they are not employed for legitimate reason they can scream foul play and get a check. In fact, they might as well go to multiple job interviews and cash in the American dream.

I couldn’t figure the best title for this post so here are a few. If you think of any put them in the comments

1. The Hijab, Free Income For Muslim Women Who Don’t Want To Work
2. The Hijab Steals 20,000 From Abercrombie & Fitch
3. The Hijab The New American Dream To Fast Cash

BTY this message may or may not be approved by CAIR say hello to them on twitter at @CAIRNAtional

CAIR’s tweet: Religious attire at work: Abercrombie faces hijab discrimination lawsuits… http://t.co/zVw3JIt7

Who didn’t listen to Metallica in the 1090′s? They rocked like few do and they have the record sells to prove it. They told a generation to not give into the man and that if the government didn’t like what you had to say then they would shut you up. In fact their famous song Eye of the Beholder said it all,”You Can Do it Your Own Way, If It’s Done Just How I Say.”  Maybe they weren’t talking about the American Government but Islam? If someone speaks out against Muhammad, profanes Islamic text or even…..draws the (No peace in him) Muhammad then you, your friends and family could get seriously killed in a government that embraces Islam.

Here is an explanation of what happens if a Muslim freely chooses to leave the faith:

But from a religious perspective, the act of abandoning one’s religion is a sin punishable by God on the Day of Judgment. If the case in question is one of merely rejecting faith, then there is no worldly punishment. If, however, the crime of undermining the foundations of the society is added to the sin of apostasy, then the case must be referred to a judicial system whose role is to protect the integrity of the society.

Question 1: What happens if a women decides to leave the faith. Can she freely decide to not wear the Hijab? Can she decide that won’t teach her children Islam? What can she freely do that wouldn’t “undermining the foundations of the society” in the mind of the judicial system? What about the Husband? Can he freely leave the faith and determine that his household will no longer adhere to Islamic teachings? I think the answer is a very loud “no” on all parts.

Question 2: If Islam taught freedom of religion then why are all people who are not Muslims classified as Dhimmis?

Throughout Islamic history, we find that Muslims have blatantly violated religious freedoms. Many churches have been converted into mosques, among which the Umayyad Mosque in Damascus. Most of the religious symbols like crosses and statues were destroyed. One of the most serious violations is the fact that Jews and Christians were systematically categorized as Dhimmis; in other words as second-class citizens, who had to pay extra taxes. Excerpt from Talk Morocco 

In America we called that view Jim Crow. That was outlawed because it made Blacks in America second class citizens. Am I wrong here?

What this sounds like is that true Muslims would have a hard time with the US Constitution that gives everyone the freedom to choose a life that they want to live. So it doesn’t make any sense to me why the US with Obama in the lead acquiesce to Muslims decry of “equality” when they are free to worship as they see fit. Oh wait. Islamic teaching holds that all governments and societies should be under Islam rule. What say you?

I don’t understand the problem here and in fact because the government hasn’t confronted these Muslims in a “salt the earth” attitude they will continue to attempt to eradicate Christians. Just as a normal person has the right to defend themselves against harm so should the Nigerian Christians protect themselves. What do you think?

While Boko Haram has been carrying out increasingly deadly attacks for months, including an August suicide bombing of UN headquarters in Abuja that left 25 dead, the Christmas violence sparked intense fear and outrage.

It also led to warnings from Christian leaders that they would defend themselves if such attacks continued, raising deep concern in a country roughly divided between a mainly Muslim north and predominately Christian south.

“Consequently, I have… declared a state of emergency in the following parts of the federation,” Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan said, listing parts of the states of Borno, where Boko Haram traditionally has its base, as well as Yobe, Niger and Plateau.

Earlier Saturday, he visited the church where the bloodiest Christmas attack occurred and branded Boko Haram a “cancerous” group bent on destroying Nigeria while vowing it would be crushed.

Jonathan said in a nationwide broadcast that “it has become imperative to take some decisive measures necessary to restore normalcy in the country especially within the affected communities.”

“Consequently, I have… declared a state of emergency in the following parts of the federation,” he said, listing parts of the states of Borno, where Boko Haram traditionally has its base, as well as Yobe, Niger and Plateau.

Excerpt from: Nigeria in a state of emergency

If we need to live like Muhammad then pitty the daughter whose dad will sell her off!

Murfreesboro was put on the map concerning Islam with this video about the dangers of Sharia Law. Tennessee has now created a bill that would make it “felony to follow some versions of the Islamic code known as Shariah.”  There is no question that dhimmitude is against the law in every state of the Union. In addition, killing and harming those who don’t believe as you do is against the law. So it does be the question. Does a bill like this need to even exist?

Here’s the story:

Tennessee is considering making it a felony to follow some versions of the Islamic code known as Shariah, the most severe measure yet put forth by a national movement whose members believe extremist Muslims want Shariah to supersede the Constitution.

The bill – drawn up by conservatives with ties to opponents of a planned Islamic center two blocks from New York City’s ground zero and efforts to expand a mosque 30 miles southeast of Nashville – would face steep constitutional hurdles if enacted.

Nevertheless, it represents the boldest legislative attempt yet to limit how Muslims worship.

Muslim groups fear the measure would outlaw central tenets of Islam, such as praying five times a day toward Mecca, abstaining from alcohol or fasting for Ramadan.

Read More Here

Remember these girls who were killed by their father because of their “dishonorable” acts?Aparently Finland is having a problem with honor killings and honor violence of daughters from muslim homes. Of all the countries you could think of Finland is the last one I would think had a problem with honor killings. But in fact they do. Take a read of this.

Here’s the story:

The Child Welfare Act obliges an official to submit a report if a child or adolescent is in danger.

Helsingin Sanomat reported on Sunday that according to the Mannerheim League for Child Welfare, thousands of girls particularly in immigrant families with a Muslim background are afraid of their immediate relatives, while being subjected to physical or mental violence.

The reason for the control is the fact that the Muslim family honour is equated with the virginity of their daughters.

Continued . . .

”As a rule, the first person to know about what is going on is the girl’s teacher. At that point, one should intervene in the situation, but due to the concealment rules, the teacher in question cannot speak about it in the student welfare group”, says manager Marja Repo, from the immigrant training department of the Vantaa Adult Education Centre.

According to Repo, the parents of the student concerned should give their permission before the welfare group could handle the issue. However, asking for permission is not an option, if the person who threatens the girl is one of her family members.

”It is possible that the person who is posing the threat understands that something is going on, and an intervention could lead to sad consequences.”

Continued . . .

”In addition to extreme cases, there are many families exhibiting mental violence. Even sons can be tasked with guarding daughters. That, too, is violence”, Lounatvuori adds.

Lounatvuori feels that honour-related violence is ”a major issue and certainly an increasing problem”.

It has been estimated that by 2030, one in four children in Helsinki will live in a multicultural family.

The lack of standards for response is a consequence of the fact that honour-related violence does not belong to any one particular ministry but is a question of broad cooperation, says Vilpas.

”It is not clear which decision-making body is responsible for drafting national guidelines”, notes Vilpas.

Minister of Immigration Astrid Thors (Swedish People’s Party) admits that training and the creating of standards of activity would not require huge sums of money. She compares the attitudes of other ministries with a fire extinguishing system.

”Even sprinklers are not installed before there has been a fire and some victims. Too often results are achieved only after a crisis”, Thors argues.

Read Complete Story Here:

Does anyone ever wonder why most families don’t willingly move into homes where their neighbors have a history of violence? Uh, No. It doesn’t happen because of the high chance that violence is going to spill over and a family member is going to get hurt. For some reason Obama and the like think the complete opposite about the Muslim Brotherhood. The Brotherhood has a history of violence and they are vocal about it. They want everyone who doesn’t believe like they do to suffer the consequences. So why is Israel the only country that concerned about them?

A senior Israeli official is suggesting the Muslim Brotherhood should be banned from standing in Egyptian elections because it is an extremist organization.

Deputy foreign minister Danny Ayalon said Monday Israel would object to the Brotherhood being part of a future government “on the merit of their agenda … and their policies.”

Read more: Egypt could ban Muslim Brotherhood: Israel – The Times of India http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/Egypt-could-ban-Muslim-Brotherhood-Israel/articleshow/7597119.cms#ixzz1FMBEhrXU