e-channel search | Blog

Everything’s Rosie for e-channel search this Valentine’s Day

Mr Impossible — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:05:06 +0000

Search marketing executive Silvi Tiivas recieved a lovely gift box containing 2 dozen red roses. The roses came from Silvi’s client 1300 flowers.

1300 flowers are a national florist for whom e-channel, Silvi, have been managing PPC campaigns for with great success.

The flowers were to thank Silvi for her excellent PPC strategy recommendations and implementation for the lead up to and including Valentines Day.

Share This (Digg it, Furl it, e-mail it, etc)

Google Ad parameters (previously Live Ads)

Little Miss Curious — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:40:40 +0000

On the 24^th of November 2009 Google announced a new feature in its v2009API, called Ad parameters. Ad parameters enables you to change numeric information such as prices, discount percentages, inventory level, etc. within an text ad in real time, while keeping the history and statistics associated with the ad.

Before Google launched Ad parameters Adwords users had to delete the old ad and write a new one every time they wanted to update information such as price or quantity in their ads, resulting in the ads losing their Quality Score and performance history.

The announcement of the launch of Ad parameters was no surprise to e-channel search. In fact, we have been working with Ad parameters (previously known as Live Ads) for several months while it was in beta test. We are absolutely thrilled to see it graduate from beta.

Ad parameters is now an included feature in our propitiatory campaign management software, Dynamic Creative^TM, enabling the software to automatically build and update dynamic ads.

Below is an example of the type of ads we can create with Dynamic Creative^TM:

Hong Kong Flights

Fly from Sydney to Hong Kong for $521,

Act Now, Only 5 Seats Left.

www.flyflyfly.com

The results speaks for themselves, by including Ad parameters in the ads the CPA for one of our largest clients active in the travel industry has decreased by 69% at the same time as the CTR has increased by 600%.

Share This (Digg it, Furl it, e-mail it, etc)

e-channel search ranked number 43 in Deloitte Technology Fast 50

Little Miss Curious — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:33:27 +0000

e-channel search has been ranked number 43 in Deloitte’s prestigious Technology Fast 50 Australia 2009. Deloitte Technology Fast 50 is a program that recognises and profiles fast growing technology companies. The program, which has been running in Australia for 9 years now, ranks the 50 fastest growing public or private technology companies, based on percentage revenue growth over three years (2007 to 2009).

Read the full report here: http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-Australia/Local%20Assets/Documents/news-research/Press%20releases/Tech%20Fast%2050/Technology_Fast_50_Australia_2009.pdf

Share This (Digg it, Furl it, e-mail it, etc)

Search Advertising is the Most Cost Effective

Mr Stubborn — Sun, 07 Jun 2009 12:38:05 +0000

Marketers and advertisers, ever wonder where you should be investing your marketing or advertising dollars? Search advertising is definitely one that you should put it into your marketing mix and invest heavily as search advertising has been proven to be the most cost effective method of advertising (Piper Jaffray Study). The study shows that the cost per lead from the search engines is a fraction of the cost of email marketing, direct mail, online banners or yellow pages.

Share This (Digg it, Furl it, e-mail it, etc)

PR drives up to 80pc of content: The Australian

Little Miss Sunshine — Sun, 03 May 2009 21:46:42 +0000

A University of Sydney study reported in The Australian’s media section this morning says it’s a myth that journos don’t use PR and press release content to generate their stories - instead, 30-80% of content comes from PR efforts.
The article also reports it’s a myth that PR people don’t spin - or to put it another way, it’s true that PR people spin, when directed to do so by their clients. (You always hope that readers are smart enough to see that, equally, journalists work under the instruction of their editors. They have to espouse the party line they don’t always share and sometimes put a negative spin on stories just to increase their newsworthiness.)
The study’s author, Jim Macnamara, says: “PR is a fact of life. Journalists should recognise it as an important communication channel and not deny it. And if there is PR material being used, it should be open and transparent.” Couldn’t agree more - the more quality PR, the better the relationship with the journalist, the better you become as reliable and trusted a source as any other. Bloggers themselves have become both a source of news and a publishing vehicle for PR - there’s another debate in the making.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,25422943-7582,00.html?from=public_rss

Share This (Digg it, Furl it, e-mail it, etc)

Swine Flue impact on Search

e-channel — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:16:22 +0000

Lesson’s from SARS show that Swine Flu needs to be watched carefully by businesses. Reduced international air travel should result in advertisers rethinking marketing and advertising strategies. In Australia tourism operators will focus more on intrastate & interstate sales as consumers rethink overseas travel arrangements. Also history shows that after events like this the market rebounds so a long term view is best.

We will all deal with this latest outbreak and if contained its impact will be short term, but there is and will be impact. For travel, tourism and hospitality businesses in particular, realigning advertising strategies early can soften the commercial impact of such event. Stopping a PPC campaign is not the answer, rethinking your advertising strategy will serve you better and retain market share as many businesses make poor decision during times of uncertain events. Those businesses that put a strategic marketing response in place and continue advertising will rebound faster when it ends. Continuing you PPC campaign will be your best value advertising option. Your brand will remain strong in the market place which will allow you to gain market share against competitors that get it wrong.

My advise is learn the lesson from SARS, be aware, research before reacting and if your business is being affected adjust your advertising strategies and KPI’s. Search agencies that have experienced events like SARS will be better able to recommend PPC options to suit your particular circumstances.

Share This (Digg it, Furl it, e-mail it, etc)

Why I’d rather pay for news than some devious premium text message I didn’t ask for

Little Miss Sunshine — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:47:24 +0000

Google and other companies that aggregate content without paying a fee have been likened to “parasites… in the intestines of the internet” by Wall Street Journal editor Robert Thomson. Talking of parasites, I recently got a phone bill for $50 of ‘premium messages’ that I tracked back to a quiz I answered on Facebook. So I have paid $5 a throw for some total crap I didn’t want. These two might appear unconnected, but I want to draw attention to the irony that we consumers are willing to pay millions and millions of dollars for mobile texts while refusing to pay a few cents for professionally produced online news.
It has always struck me as unfair that media companies pay their journalists to produce content while the aggregators simply swipe it, stick a few ads round it, and reap the rewards. Journalism at its best exposes injustice and produces in depth analysis, but think about the cost, say, of sending journalists into Afghanistan or Timor. Finely crafted writing doesn’t come cheap. But is anyone out there willing to pay for it?
I agree with Google CEO Eric Schmidt that newspapers need to innovate more to turn their news-making machines into profit centres. He suggests mobile as one path, and I’m guessing that means on-phone subscriptions for web-based content. If the price was right and I had the right device (which I don’t because I’m still paying for my last phone, and my kids’ phones), and it was easy to view on the screen, yes, I probably would pay to consume high-quality news on my mobile.
But I don’t want to pay through the nose for spurious, uninvited text messages….. I’d much rather pay News Ltd for some decent reporting than some smutty text-messaging company who hijacked my details through some fineprint on Facebook….

Share This (Digg it, Furl it, e-mail it, etc)

Trial by social media: Hanson et al

Little Miss Sunshine — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 03:41:22 +0000

In response to the call last month by Victorian police to stop internet blogging about the alleged Victorian bushfire arsonist:

When the alleged Victorian bushfire arsonist was outed with his photograph published on Facebook and numerous blog posts, did the social network and possibly the self-publishers breach a court order that prevents media discussing the case? Should social networks be subject to the same conditions as other media publishers and broadcasters?

By revealing the accused’s identity, the Facebook posts could jeopardise his right to a fair hearing. The reason the law binds traditional media is that prejudice could result in a guilty man walking free, or an innocent being found guilty.

Some social network operators claim speaking freely is the right of their members and equate it to catching up with a mate in the street. The reality is that social networks are as public as your local newspaper.

Take another recent high-profile case: when purported pictures of Pauline Hanson turned out to be fakes, people asked, ‘have the media gone too far?’ This highlighted two issues:
1. The individual’s moral right to privacy: were these tacky 30-year-old images in the public interest?
2. What are Pauline’s legal rights? If the pictures were published on a social network, what would be her legal rights then?

These two cases open us all to the possibility of being victimised for a crime we did not commit, or being subjected to embarrassment or harassment if inaccurate or sensitive information is published, either online or offline. Proving false accusers are wrong in court is costly and, sadly, even if you win, mud sticks.

Without regulation, social networks can become a great playground for bullies - and they already are to a degree. Just ask Jodie Melbourne of CQR Consulting, a white hat hacker who is crusading against cyber-bullying.

Even if you lead a pristine existence, would you want your entire private live opened up for all to see, from birth to grave, whether by writing, image, video or sound, without your permission? The whole issue of privacy, online and offline, reminds me of the Ben Elton book Blind Faith, which paints an ugly picture of a world where it’s illegal NOT to expose every moment of your life publicly.

Whereas smaller social forums have tended to be self-policed by their members, the mega-networks have much bigger challenges. I believe that if they can’t control malicious or illicit content, they will eventually implode. There will be more and more cases of inaccurate opinions and indiscreet pictures taken in private circumstances — leading to legal challenges and a mass turnoff by people who want to keep their private lives private. The Twitter network has some precedents - there already are laws governing harassment by text message.

The “Wild West” feel of social networks is exhilarating; suddenly we don’t need to rely on third party media channeling our opinions. But both advocates and owners of social networks who feel they have a right to freedom of speech at any cost are heading down a slippery slope.

Share This (Digg it, Furl it, e-mail it, etc)

Spreading sunshine with search-engine friendly PR

Little Miss Sunshine — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:15:26 +0000

Hi - I’m new to e-Channel’s blog so first a bit about me: I’m a journalist with a background that covers everything from Australian Women’s Weekly to The Australian newspaper’s Tuesday IT section, Vacations Magazine (travel writing - those were the days:-)) to Cosmopolitan to the Toronto Star. I founded a service called NewsMaker last year to help marketers and PR dudes give their clients added value with every PR campaign - Google News Indexing, SEO, social media as well as traditional media distribution services. Here are my favourite tips to help you get started in maximising every word in every press release while increasing your Google quality ranking:

Top Ten Tips for Successful Online Publicity

The following tips for writing online press releases will help generate buzz about your products and services across the web, driving traffic back to your website and creating a direct channel to journalists, media outlets and customers.

Use major keywords in your heading and first paragraph - these are often all that will be picked up by Google and other News Indexing services
Proactively share your news using the share and RSS buttons on press release websites
Don’t use “you” and “your” or “I”, “we” or “our”, unless it’s within a quote - your press release should be written in the third person so it doesn’t sound like an advertisement
Make your headline meaningful to media and search engines - don’t be too clever
Keep it short - Google will not index news item that are too long
Make your press release relevant to news or trends - get the message across succintly in headline and first par
Make sure you have good landing pages on your website relevant to your press release - otherwise you are missing an opportunity
Proofread your release and make sure it’s of a press-ready standard; your release could end up anywhere and you don’t want to spread an unprofessional image of your company (or yourself)
Use free online press release services tagged with relevant keywords to make it easy for people looking for your products/services to find them - this is the cheapest, easiest free publicity you will find
If you’re new to online press releases, post older material first then work your way up to the present so you have a good history online, driving incremental (long tail) traffic back to your website.

Cheers,

Little Miss Sunshine

Share This (Digg it, Furl it, e-mail it, etc)

SEM and SEO: Agency Vs In-House

Mr Grumpy — Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:44:32 +0000

In almost 10 years of working in advertising and marketing there is only one aspect that has caused the most arguments in the industry and that is the trade off between In-House and Agency for SEM and SEO. Every company has their own thoughts on the subject and all of them can hold forth with a reasonable argument for their choice. However no matter how effective their reasoning is all of them boil down to four simple points: Time, Cost, Results and Control.

Most companies feel that these four key points will determine the direction that they go when it comes to how they manage SEM and SEO and it is quite obvious why. Combined they will decide how effective the campaigns are and what the bottom line return will be at the end of the day.

More often than not a business that decides to manage their SEM or SEO themselves will have a simple reason for doing so and it will use a combination of all of the above points or the ones that are most important to them. But if you look into them a little deeper it simply does not make financial or rational sense to attempt to self manage an effective SEM campaign In-House if the business has a large number of keywords active in their campaigns.

Aside from the obvious fact that all Agency fees are a tax deduction as a Marketing Expense we need to look at the hidden costs of doing SEM and SEO In-House. Firstly you need to find an expert who is willing to manage it on your behalf and these do not come cheap, if you decide to manage the campaigns without a specialist in SEM or SEO then the person assigned to manage the campaign will have no time to do anything but monitor the campaigns therefore there is a loss of productivity from 1 staff member who is in effect learning on the job. Following on from this is the fact that an active campaign needs to be constantly checked, modified and updated to ensure that there is no wastage and that you are achieving the best possible results. Lastly if you are running a campaign with any number of Keywords over a thousand you need to maintain your quality score through effective Landing Page Management and multiple Creative’s for each keyword as consumers want to be hooked to click on the link rather than just see the same generic Creative for every search term.

When you add all of the above aspects together then it seems obvious that of the four key points highlighted at the start there is only one that stands up as to why a company would manage their SEM and SEO In-House, and that is Control. There is a demonstrated loss of staff time as they try to manage campaigns while doing their core role, results suffer as the Quality Score for the campaign will not be at an optimal level and the costs (both of the campaign and the staff costs) spiral as there is not going to be an effective system of management on what keywords are working and how to alter the Creatives to enhance Click Through Rates.

A good SEM and SEO Agency will manage all of the above on your behalf and consult with the client to ensure that they maintain complete control and understanding of what is going on, once a company has found the best Agency for them then the upfront cost of setting up the campaign and the ongoing Agency fees are actually going to save them money in the long term as a result of better campaign management, higher traffic levels, greater conversion rates and a better understanding of what is working for them now and will work for them in the future.

In short if you are running campaigns with more than a couple of thousand keywords then you are costing yourself money by attempting to manage your SEM and SEO campaigns In-House.

Share This (Digg it, Furl it, e-mail it, etc)