<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>echovar - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-f06d4976" type="application/json" /><link>http://echovar.disqus.com/</link><description>Cliff Gerrish on Economies, Language, Culture and the Network</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:43:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/echovar/MZUE" /><feedburner:info uri="echovar/mzue" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><title>Re: Poindexter, Jonas and The Birth of Real-Time Dot Connecting</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/gxoZeFxkWnM/</link><description>The interesting bit is that everyone has the same problem, it's cheap and easy to collect dots-- but it's expensive and hard to connect them. If the pattern holds, we should expect that technology to come from DARPA or In-Q-Tel rather than the Silicon Valley.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:43:28 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3271#comment-75752594</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Poindexter, Jonas and The Birth of Real-Time Dot Connecting</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/J78p_c-RhCQ/</link><description>Remarkable article; not surprising at all, considering the time and the man. Real time tracking for the intelligence community has had to be a long time dream and the ability for a full aggregate of "Everything" the best way to tailor results. Strangely, it also seems like the best way to misdirect information as we've found out early in the social media days; how many times have the guns been jumped without checking a second source in the twitter age? I always felt that besides the obvious technical difficulties of managing the firehose that certain elements wouldn't want "citizens" to have access to such information.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aronski</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:00:47 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3271#comment-75744467</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Gluttony: Total Information Awareness, Personal Edition</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/AaiisN0c9bo/</link><description>I'll definitely take a look.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:41:51 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3231#comment-70953776</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Gluttony: Total Information Awareness, Personal Edition</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/FvDoEh3Yavg/</link><description>Hi Cliff,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;  Nice write-up. You should check out &lt;a href="http://feeltiptop.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://feeltiptop.com&lt;/a&gt;/   a new way of absorbing information. The current product is more of a prototype but you can I think see the potential of the engine. Let me know what you think, would love discuss if you have time. This is my latest project :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers&lt;br&gt;Shampa</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter-12301392</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:09:26 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3231#comment-70897838</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Gluttony: Total Information Awareness, Personal Edition</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/WBw6B0uOCM8/</link><description>Seems like contextual information is the *only* possible thing. It's how language works.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:05:42 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3231#comment-70655784</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Gluttony: Total Information Awareness, Personal Edition</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/SEdPzvpF03I/</link><description>I'd wait to see if you hear about these concepts from a few other people. The post itself is only a container for the ideas.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:04:37 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3231#comment-70655698</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Gluttony: Total Information Awareness, Personal Edition</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/H7GGs_y2cZ8/</link><description>HAMM:&lt;br&gt;I love the old questions.&lt;br&gt;(With fervour.)&lt;br&gt;Ah the old questions, the old answers, there's nothing like them!&lt;br&gt;(Pause.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.samuel-beckett.net/endgame.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.samuel-beckett.net/endgame.html&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:02:26 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3231#comment-70655502</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Gluttony: Total Information Awareness, Personal Edition</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/VuFR7MeVrRA/</link><description>"Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." --Pablo Picasso</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter-7766852</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:57:02 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3231#comment-70654945</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Gluttony: Total Information Awareness, Personal Edition</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/FsPG3wfF7Ik/</link><description>Not sure I agree about the filter since then question behind the question research or info seeking is then ignored....well maybe not. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If used as a meta filter, hearing about Afganistan three time or misinformation three times, then I understand. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Certainly we are overwhelmed with info. I find there are dimensions, questions and information behind the original topic, that pull me but also add to the overload. Contextual information is almost impossible.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter-15087391</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 15:59:38 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3231#comment-70634787</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Gluttony: Total Information Awareness, Personal Edition</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/LGdpxd1ubKs/</link><description>Very interesting, but not sure about letting any attention rest on it . I heard about this post from one person I know, @Karoli... but is following someone on Twitter for two years really knowing...? Blasted Internet, raising more questions than answers as usual.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paprikapink</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 15:51:28 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3231#comment-70633707</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Electronic Yellow Sticky Routing Slips: Tweets As Pointers</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/_AoIX6UR82Y/</link><description>Excellent! Especially the idea that twitter ist not a version of something else.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">heinz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 03:55:40 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3155#comment-65820119</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Electronic Yellow Sticky Routing Slips: Tweets As Pointers</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/4ps1AZPt6v4/</link><description>Very concise thoughts, I fully concur.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, besides from Flipboard I also like &lt;a href="http://Paper.li" rel="nofollow"&gt;Paper.li&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;E.g. 'my' news on web 2.0 are called &lt;a href="http://paper.li/qualterio" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://paper.li/qualterio&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gualterio</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 03:12:30 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3155#comment-65817892</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Permanent Markers: Memory And Forgiveness</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/48dRc8rLhcI/</link><description>Mutation is one of the ways language works. Lera Boroditsky has done some interesting work on how language shapes thought: &lt;a href="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/boroditsky09/boroditsky09_index.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/boroditsky09/boroditsky09_index.html&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:10:06 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3135#comment-64750326</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Permanent Markers: Memory And Forgiveness</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/wrfRZ2g2UbE/</link><description>Excellent points to ponder.  An added twist is that mutation of word meanings can radically alter the apparant meaning of your past writings.  This is quite likely as historical criticism as an approach to "understanding" what people meant in the past is quite widespread.  
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;"Words Have Meaning": Don't mutate meaning for cleverness or "branding" -&lt;a href="http://wp.me/pVUDj-7J" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://wp.me/pVUDj-7J&lt;/a&gt; explores this a bit at "RenaissanceRules"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randy Bosch</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:23:05 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3135#comment-64743732</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: As Machines May Think&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/r4dXug60tYE/</link><description>'Machines that think' or 'machines who think.' The difference in those two phrases encapsulates the problem.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:28:21 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3069#comment-62983208</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: As Machines May Think&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/u8W0wM8J0yM/</link><description>Awesome. You have touched on the soul. Thinker and thought can't be separate. And memories ARE alternative realities, or witnesses would be more reliable.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hardaway</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:22:50 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3069#comment-62982868</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: As Machines May Think&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/0lTaPQl6kgs/</link><description>Perhaps we should call it 'intelligent design.'</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:51:46 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3069#comment-62450432</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: As Machines May Think&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/iDVCsUY0IyU/</link><description>I dont even know why people call it artificial intelligence, its programmed by us there is nothing artificial about it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">LarryM</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:38:53 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3069#comment-62449108</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: As Machines May Think&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/8qElzgGppHY/</link><description>I'd prefer to leave out the words "artificial" and "intelligence." Can't we just say that "better" is better than worse?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:57:01 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3069#comment-62420032</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: As Machines May Think&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/m_wcCwjWlk4/</link><description>Two comments on AI: (1) Artificial Intelligence is better than none, and, (2) No amount of Artificial Intelligence can overcome Real Stupidity</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter-16276025</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:51:51 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3069#comment-62419199</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Banks, Walled Gardens And Metaphors of Place</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/Mxzq47v39lU/</link><description>Banks don't stop at national borders, although their regulation does. Financial instruments, excessive and otherwise, have an international circulation. But I'll grant you that American banks do have an excess of creativity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:01:02 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3044#comment-61944780</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Banks, Walled Gardens And Metaphors of Place</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/0mMNIMbNeKQ/</link><description>Actually one could argue (as I often do) that American Banks were simply to competitive with each other which spurred the creation of excessive financial instruments. Take a look at how stable Canadian banks were during the crisis.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charlesbo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:18:06 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=3044#comment-61938499</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Real-Time Networks, Man-In-The-Middle, And The Misappropriation Of &amp;#8216;Hot News&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/F2H5pdO9AUE/</link><description>The borders at the edges of organizations are always permeable membranes. Rolling Stone publishes every 2 weeks, generally it's not going to matter if a Lady Gaga tell all leaks out early. The issue here is that the story for the paper edition connected with a bigger ongoing story about COIN. The two stories coming into contact ignited. Rolling Stone will do okay, everyone is talking about them and that's bound to sell some magazines.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cgerrish</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:39:25 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=2995#comment-58345218</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Real-Time Networks, Man-In-The-Middle, And The Misappropriation Of &amp;#8216;Hot News&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/hBnATDvKecg/</link><description>I was amazed that Rolling Stone allowed the details to leak without being ready to publish the story somewhere other than paper. Amazed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:36:30 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=2995#comment-58337233</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: The End of the PC: 3 Screens and a Cloud</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/echovar/MZUE/~3/h-QcDcpfyKk/</link><description>Great and informative article.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nicetalk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 04:34:21 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.echovar.com/?p=2622#comment-57214601</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
