<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EconomicGreenfield</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.economicgreenfield.com/</link>
	<description>America&#039;s Economic Future - A Discussion By Ted Kavadas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 20:07:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7941319</site>	<item>
		<title>Trends Of S&#038;P500 Earnings Forecasts</title>
		<link>https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/14/trends-of-sp500-earnings-forecasts-160/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Kavadas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 20:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Investor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P500 Earnings]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.economicgreenfield.com/?p=35399</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>S&#38;P500 earnings trends and estimates&#160;are a notably important topic, for a variety of reasons, at this point in time. FactSet&#160;publishes a report titled “Earnings Insight” that contains a variety of information including the trends and expectations of S&#38;P500 earnings. For reference purposes, here are two charts as seen in the “Earnings Insight” report of June ... </p>
<p class="read-more-container"><a title="Trends Of S&#38;P500 Earnings Forecasts" class="read-more button" href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/14/trends-of-sp500-earnings-forecasts-160/#more-35399" aria-label="Read more about Trends Of S&#38;P500 Earnings Forecasts">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/14/trends-of-sp500-earnings-forecasts-160/">Trends Of S&amp;P500 Earnings Forecasts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/tag/sp500-earnings/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">S&amp;P500 earnings trends and estimates</a>&nbsp;are a notably important topic, for a variety of reasons, at this point in time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="http://www.factset.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">FactSet</a>&nbsp;publishes a report titled “Earnings Insight” that contains a variety of information including the trends and expectations of S&amp;P500 earnings.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For reference purposes, here are two charts as seen in the “Earnings Insight” report of June 12, 2026:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">from page 30:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>(click on charts to enlarge images)</em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/FactSet-Earnings-Insight-6-12-26-CY-2026-CY-2027.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="665" height="381" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/FactSet-Earnings-Insight-6-12-26-CY-2026-CY-2027.png" alt="S&amp;P500 EPS" class="wp-image-35400" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/FactSet-Earnings-Insight-6-12-26-CY-2026-CY-2027.png 665w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/FactSet-Earnings-Insight-6-12-26-CY-2026-CY-2027-300x172.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 665px) 100vw, 665px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">from page 31:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/FactSet-Earnings-Insight-6-12-26-CY2016-CY2027.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="670" height="379" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/FactSet-Earnings-Insight-6-12-26-CY2016-CY2027.png" alt="S&amp;P500 EPS 2016-2027" class="wp-image-35401" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/FactSet-Earnings-Insight-6-12-26-CY2016-CY2027.png 670w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/FactSet-Earnings-Insight-6-12-26-CY2016-CY2027-300x170.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 670px) 100vw, 670px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">_____</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I post various economic forecasts because I believe they should be carefully monitored.&nbsp; However, as those familiar with this site are aware, I do not agree with many of the consensus estimates and much of the commentary in these forecast surveys.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">_____</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/a-special-note-on-our-economic-situation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Special Note</a>&nbsp;summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>SPX at 7431.46 as this post is written</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/14/trends-of-sp500-earnings-forecasts-160/">Trends Of S&amp;P500 Earnings Forecasts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">35399</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>S&#038;P500 EPS Forecasts For 2026-2028 As Of June 12, 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/14/sp500-eps-forecasts-for-2026-2028-as-of-june-12-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Kavadas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 19:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Investor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P500 Earnings]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.economicgreenfield.com/?p=35396</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As many are aware, Refinitiv&#160;publishes earnings estimates for the S&#38;P500. &#160;(My other posts concerning S&#38;P earnings estimates can be found under the&#160;S&#38;P500 Earnings&#160;tag) The following estimates are from Exhibit 24 of the “S&#38;P500 Earnings Scorecard” (pdf) of June 12, 2026, and represent an aggregation of individual S&#38;P500 component “bottom up” analyst forecasts.  For reference, the Year ... </p>
<p class="read-more-container"><a title="S&#38;P500 EPS Forecasts For 2026-2028 As Of June 12, 2026" class="read-more button" href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/14/sp500-eps-forecasts-for-2026-2028-as-of-june-12-2026/#more-35396" aria-label="Read more about S&#38;P500 EPS Forecasts For 2026-2028 As Of June 12, 2026">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/14/sp500-eps-forecasts-for-2026-2028-as-of-june-12-2026/">S&amp;P500 EPS Forecasts For 2026-2028 As Of June 12, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As many are aware, Refinitiv&nbsp;publishes earnings estimates for the S&amp;P500. &nbsp;(My other posts concerning S&amp;P earnings estimates can be found under the&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/tag/sp500-earnings/" target="_blank">S&amp;P500 Earnings</a>&nbsp;tag)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The following estimates are from Exhibit 24 of the “<a href="https://lipperalpha.refinitiv.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/TRPR_82201_20260612.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">S&amp;P500 Earnings Scorecard</a>” (pdf) of June 12, 2026, and represent an aggregation of individual S&amp;P500 component “bottom up” analyst forecasts.  For reference, the Year 2014 value is $118.78/share; the Year 2015 value is $117.46/share; the Year 2016 value is $118.10/share; the Year 2017 value is $132.00/share; the Year 2018 value is $161.93/share; the Year 2019 value is $162.93/share; the Year 2020 value is $139.72/share; the year 2021 value is $208.12/share; the year 2022 value is $218.09/share; the year 2023 value is $221.36/share; the year 2024 value is $242.73/share; and the year 2025 value is $271.29/share:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Year 2026 estimate:</span></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">$340.39/share</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Year 2027 estimate:</span></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">$397.87/share</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Year 2028 estimate:</span></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">$446.60/share</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">_____</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I post various economic forecasts because I believe they should be carefully monitored.&nbsp; However, as those familiar with this site are aware, I do not agree with many of the consensus estimates and much of the commentary in these forecast surveys.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">_____</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>The&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/a-special-note-on-our-economic-situation/" target="_blank">Special Note</a>&nbsp;summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>SPX at 7431.46 as this post is written</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/14/sp500-eps-forecasts-for-2026-2028-as-of-june-12-2026/">S&amp;P500 EPS Forecasts For 2026-2028 As Of June 12, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">35396</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Total Household Net Worth As Of 1Q 2026 – Two Long-Term Charts</title>
		<link>https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/12/total-household-net-worth-as-of-1q-2026-two-long-term-charts/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Kavadas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 19:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[household net worth]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.economicgreenfield.com/?p=35389</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>For reference purposes, here is Total Household Net Worth from a long-term perspective (from 1945:Q4 through 2026:Q1).  The last value (as of the June 11, 2026 update) is $182.979889 Trillion: (click on each chart to enlarge image) – Also of interest is the same metric presented on a “Percent Change from a Year Ago” basis, ... </p>
<p class="read-more-container"><a title="Total Household Net Worth As Of 1Q 2026 – Two Long-Term Charts" class="read-more button" href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/12/total-household-net-worth-as-of-1q-2026-two-long-term-charts/#more-35389" aria-label="Read more about Total Household Net Worth As Of 1Q 2026 – Two Long-Term Charts">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/12/total-household-net-worth-as-of-1q-2026-two-long-term-charts/">Total Household Net Worth As Of 1Q 2026 – Two Long-Term Charts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For reference purposes, here is Total Household Net Worth from a long-term perspective (from 1945:Q4 through 2026:Q1).  The last value (as of the June 11, 2026 update) is $182.979889 Trillion:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>(click on each chart to enlarge image)</em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/TNWBSHNO_6-11-26-182979889.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="895" height="601" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/TNWBSHNO_6-11-26-182979889.png" alt="TNWBSHNO" class="wp-image-35391" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/TNWBSHNO_6-11-26-182979889.png 895w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/TNWBSHNO_6-11-26-182979889-300x201.png 300w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/TNWBSHNO_6-11-26-182979889-768x516.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 895px) 100vw, 895px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">–</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Also of interest is the same metric presented on a “Percent Change from a Year Ago” basis, with a current value of 7.9%:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/TNWBSHNO_6-11-26-182979889-7.9-Percent-Change-From-Year-Ago.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="895" height="601" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/TNWBSHNO_6-11-26-182979889-7.9-Percent-Change-From-Year-Ago.png" alt="TNWBSHNO Percent Change From Year Ago" class="wp-image-35393" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/TNWBSHNO_6-11-26-182979889-7.9-Percent-Change-From-Year-Ago.png 895w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/TNWBSHNO_6-11-26-182979889-7.9-Percent-Change-From-Year-Ago-300x201.png 300w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/TNWBSHNO_6-11-26-182979889-7.9-Percent-Change-From-Year-Ago-768x516.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 895px) 100vw, 895px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; accessed June 12, 2026; <br><a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/TNWBSHNO" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/TNWBSHNO</a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">_____</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/a-special-note-on-our-economic-situation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Special Note</a>&nbsp;summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>SPX at 7419.63 as this post is written</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/12/total-household-net-worth-as-of-1q-2026-two-long-term-charts/">Total Household Net Worth As Of 1Q 2026 – Two Long-Term Charts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">35389</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFIB Small Business Optimism – May 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/09/nfib-small-business-optimism-may-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Kavadas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 20:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.economicgreenfield.com/?p=35386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The May 2026 NFIB Small Business Optimism report was released today, June 9, 2026. The Index of Small Business Optimism decreased by .6 points to 95.3. Here is an excerpt that I find particularly notable (but don’t necessarily agree with): The NFIB Small Business Optimism Index fell 0.6 points in May to 95.3, remaining below its 52-year ... </p>
<p class="read-more-container"><a title="NFIB Small Business Optimism – May 2026" class="read-more button" href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/09/nfib-small-business-optimism-may-2026/#more-35386" aria-label="Read more about NFIB Small Business Optimism – May 2026">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/09/nfib-small-business-optimism-may-2026/">NFIB Small Business Optimism – May 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The May 2026 NFIB Small Business Optimism report was released today, June 9, 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Index of Small Business Optimism decreased by .6 points to 95.3.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is an excerpt that I find particularly notable (but don’t necessarily agree with):</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The NFIB Small Business Optimism Index fell 0.6 points in May to 95.3, remaining below its 52-year average of 98.0. The Uncertainty Index rose 3 points from April to 91, remaining well above its historical average of 68.</p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Below is a chart of the NFIB Small Business Optimism chart, as seen in the <a href="https://www.nfib.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/NFIB-SBET-Report-May-2026.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">May 2026 NFIB Small Business Economic Trends</a><a href="https://strgnfibcom.blob.core.windows.net/nfibcom/SBET-May-2024.pdf"> (</a>pdf) report:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/NFIB-6-9-26-NFIB-Small-Business-Optimism-Index-95.3.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="522" height="320" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/NFIB-6-9-26-NFIB-Small-Business-Optimism-Index-95.3.png" alt="NFIB Small Business Optimism Index 95.3" class="wp-image-35387" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/NFIB-6-9-26-NFIB-Small-Business-Optimism-Index-95.3.png 522w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/NFIB-6-9-26-NFIB-Small-Business-Optimism-Index-95.3-300x184.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 522px) 100vw, 522px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">_____</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/a-special-note-on-our-economic-situation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Special Note</a>&nbsp;summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>SPX at 7386.65 as this post is written</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/09/nfib-small-business-optimism-may-2026/">NFIB Small Business Optimism – May 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">35386</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Building Financial Danger – June 8, 2026 Update</title>
		<link>https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/08/building-financial-danger-june-8-2026-update/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Kavadas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 20:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Investor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building financial danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&P500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock market crash]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.economicgreenfield.com/?p=35383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>My overall analysis indicates a continuing elevated and growing level of financial danger&#160;which contains many worldwide and U.S.-specific “stresses” of a very complex nature. I have written numerous posts on this site concerning both ongoing and recent “negative developments.” &#160;These developments, as well as other exceedingly problematical conditions, have presented a highly perilous economic environment ... </p>
<p class="read-more-container"><a title="Building Financial Danger – June 8, 2026 Update" class="read-more button" href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/08/building-financial-danger-june-8-2026-update/#more-35383" aria-label="Read more about Building Financial Danger – June 8, 2026 Update">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/08/building-financial-danger-june-8-2026-update/">Building Financial Danger – June 8, 2026 Update</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">My overall analysis indicates a continuing elevated and growing level of financial danger&nbsp;which contains many worldwide and U.S.-specific “stresses” of a very complex nature. I have written numerous posts on this site concerning both ongoing and recent “negative developments.” &nbsp;These developments, as well as other exceedingly problematical conditions, have presented a highly perilous economic environment that endangers the overall financial system.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Also of ongoing immense importance is the existence of various immensely large&nbsp;<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/category/bubbles-asset/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">asset bubbles</a>, a subject of which I have extensively written. &nbsp;While all of these asset bubbles are wildly pernicious and will have profound adverse future implications, hazards presented by the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/tag/bond-bubble/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">bond market bubble</a>&nbsp;are especially notable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Predicting the specific timing and extent of a stock market crash is always difficult, and the immense complexity of today’s economic situation makes such a prediction even more challenging. With that being said, my analyses continue to indicate that a near-term exceedingly large (from an ultra long-term perspective) stock market crash – that would also involve (as seen in 2008) various other markets – will occur. [note: the “next crash” and its aftermath has paramount significance and implications, as discussed in the post of January 6, 2012 titled “<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2012/01/06/the-next-crash-and-its-signficance/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Next Crash And Its Significance</a>“ and various subsequent posts in the “<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/category/depression/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Economic&nbsp;Depression</a>” category]</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As reference, below is a daily chart since 2008 of the S&amp;P500 (through June 8, 2026 with a last price of 7405.73), depicted on a LOG scale, indicating both the 50dma and 200dma as well as price labels:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<em>click on chart to enlarge image</em>)<em>(chart courtesy of StockCharts.com; chart creation and annotation by the author</em>)</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/EconomicGreenfield-6-8-26-SP500-since-2008-7405.73.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="900" height="396" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/EconomicGreenfield-6-8-26-SP500-since-2008-7405.73.png" alt="S&amp;P500 since 2008" class="wp-image-35384" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/EconomicGreenfield-6-8-26-SP500-since-2008-7405.73.png 900w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/EconomicGreenfield-6-8-26-SP500-since-2008-7405.73-300x132.png 300w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/EconomicGreenfield-6-8-26-SP500-since-2008-7405.73-768x338.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">_____</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/a-special-note-on-our-economic-situation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Special Note</a>&nbsp;summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>SPX at 7405.73 as this post is written</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/08/building-financial-danger-june-8-2026-update/">Building Financial Danger – June 8, 2026 Update</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">35383</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recession Probability Models – June 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/06/recession-probability-models-june-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Kavadas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 14:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Forecasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic indicators]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.economicgreenfield.com/?p=35377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There are a variety of economic models that are supposed to predict the probabilities of recession. While I don’t agree with the methodologies employed or probabilities of impending economic weakness as depicted by the following two models, I think the results of these models should be monitored. Please note that each of these models is ... </p>
<p class="read-more-container"><a title="Recession Probability Models – June 2026" class="read-more button" href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/06/recession-probability-models-june-2026/#more-35377" aria-label="Read more about Recession Probability Models – June 2026">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/06/recession-probability-models-june-2026/">Recession Probability Models – June 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are a variety of economic models that are supposed to predict the probabilities of recession.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While I don’t agree with the methodologies employed or probabilities of impending economic weakness as depicted by the following two models, I think the results of these models should be monitored.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Please note that each of these models is updated regularly, and the results of these – as well as other recession models – can fluctuate significantly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first is the “<a href="http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/capital_markets/ycfaq.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Yield Curve as a Leading Indicator</a>” from the New York Federal Reserve. &nbsp;I wrote a post concerning this measure on March 1, 2010, titled “<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2010/03/01/the-yield-curve-as-a-leading-indicator/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Yield Curve as a Leading Indicator</a>.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Currently (last updated June 4, 2026 using data through May 2026) this “Yield Curve” model shows a 14.9758% probability of a recession in the United States twelve months ahead. &nbsp;For comparison purposes, it showed a 17.6275% probability through April 2026, and a chart going back to 1960 is seen at the “<a href="https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/capital_markets/Prob_Rec.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Probability Of U.S. Recession Predicted by Treasury Spread</a>.” (pdf)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The second model is from&nbsp;Marcelle Chauvet and Jeremy Piger. &nbsp;This model is described on the&nbsp;<a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/RECPROUSM156N?cid=33120" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">St. Louis Federal Reserve site (FRED)</a>&nbsp;as follows:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Smoothed recession probabilities for the United States are obtained from a dynamic-factor markov-switching model applied to four monthly coincident variables: non-farm payroll employment, the index of industrial production, real personal income excluding transfer payments, and real manufacturing and trade sales. This model was originally developed in Chauvet, M., “An Economic Characterization of Business Cycle Dynamics with Factor Structure and Regime Switching,” International Economic Review, 1998, 39, 969-996. (<a href="http://faculty.ucr.edu/~chauvet/ier.pdf">http://faculty.ucr.edu/~chauvet/ier.pdf</a>)</p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Additional details and explanations can be seen on the “<a href="http://pages.uoregon.edu/jpiger/us_recession_probs.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">U.S. Recession Probabilities</a>” page.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This model, last updated on June 1, 2026 currently shows a .44% probability using data through April 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is the FRED chart:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/RECPROUSM156N_6-1-26-.44.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="895" height="601" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/RECPROUSM156N_6-1-26-.44.png" alt="Smoothed U.S. Recession Probabilities" class="wp-image-35379" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/RECPROUSM156N_6-1-26-.44.png 895w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/RECPROUSM156N_6-1-26-.44-300x201.png 300w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/RECPROUSM156N_6-1-26-.44-768x516.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 895px) 100vw, 895px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data Source: &nbsp;Piger, Jeremy Max and Chauvet, Marcelle, Smoothed U.S. Recession Probabilities [RECPROUSM156N], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, accessed June 5, 2026:&nbsp;&nbsp;http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/RECPROUSM156N</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">–</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The two models featured above can be compared against measures seen in recent posts.  For instance, as seen in the April 12, 2026 post titled “<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/04/12/the-april-2026-wall-street-journal-economic-forecast-survey/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The April 2026 Wall Street Journal Economic Forecast Survey</a><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2025/07/13/the-july-2025-wall-street-journal-economic-forecast-survey/">“</a> economists surveyed averaged a 33% probability of a U.S. recession within the next 12 months.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">_____</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/a-special-note-on-our-economic-situation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Special Note</a>&nbsp;summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>SPX at 7383.74 as this post is written</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/06/recession-probability-models-june-2026/">Recession Probability Models – June 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">35377</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Not In Labor Force” Statistic – As Of June 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/not-in-labor-force-statistic-as-of-june-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Kavadas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 22:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.economicgreenfield.com/?p=35374</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the November 13, 2013 post (“Not In Labor Force Statistic“) I featured editorial commentary from the Wall Street Journal, as well as an accompanying long-term chart, with regard to the number of people not working. Also, on February 9, 2015 I wrote another post titled “Unemployment And The ‘Not In Labor Force’ Statistic,” in ... </p>
<p class="read-more-container"><a title="“Not In Labor Force” Statistic – As Of June 2026" class="read-more button" href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/not-in-labor-force-statistic-as-of-june-2026/#more-35374" aria-label="Read more about “Not In Labor Force” Statistic – As Of June 2026">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/not-in-labor-force-statistic-as-of-june-2026/">“Not In Labor Force” Statistic – As Of June 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the November 13, 2013 post (“<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2013/11/13/unemployment-not-in-labor-force-statistic/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Not In Labor Force Statistic</a>“) I featured editorial commentary from the Wall Street Journal, as well as an accompanying long-term chart, with regard to the number of people not working.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Also, on February 9, 2015 I wrote another post titled “<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2015/02/09/unemployment-and-the-not-in-labor-force-statistic/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Unemployment And The ‘Not In Labor Force’ Statistic</a>,” in which I discussed various facets of this measure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Below is an updated chart regarding this statistic.  The current figure, last updated on June 5, 2026 depicting data through May 2026, is 105.253 Million people (Not Seasonally Adjusted):</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/LNU05000000_6-5-26-105253.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="895" height="601" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/LNU05000000_6-5-26-105253.png" alt="LNU05000000" class="wp-image-35375" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/LNU05000000_6-5-26-105253.png 895w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/LNU05000000_6-5-26-105253-300x201.png 300w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/LNU05000000_6-5-26-105253-768x516.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 895px) 100vw, 895px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Not in Labor Force [LNU05000000], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; accessed June 5, 2026: <br><a href="https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNU05000000" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNU05000000</a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">_____</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/a-special-note-on-our-economic-situation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Special Note</a>&nbsp;summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>SPX at 7383.74 as this post is written</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/not-in-labor-force-statistic-as-of-june-2026/">“Not In Labor Force” Statistic – As Of June 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">35374</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Average Hourly Earnings Trends</title>
		<link>https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/average-hourly-earnings-trends-158/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Kavadas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 16:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Household Income]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.economicgreenfield.com/?p=35364</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I have written many blog posts concerning the worrisome&#160;trends in income and earnings. Along these lines, one of the measures showing disconcerting trends is that of hourly earnings. While the concept of hourly earnings can be defined and measured in a variety of ways, below are a few charts that I believe broadly illustrate problematic ... </p>
<p class="read-more-container"><a title="Average Hourly Earnings Trends" class="read-more button" href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/average-hourly-earnings-trends-158/#more-35364" aria-label="Read more about Average Hourly Earnings Trends">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/average-hourly-earnings-trends-158/">Average Hourly Earnings Trends</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have written many blog posts concerning the worrisome&nbsp;<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/tag/household-income/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">trends in income and earnings</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Along these lines, one of the measures showing disconcerting trends is that of hourly earnings.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While the concept of hourly earnings can be defined and measured in a variety of ways, below are a few charts that I believe broadly illustrate problematic trends.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first chart depicts Average Hourly Earnings Of All Employees: Total Private (FRED series CES0500000003)(current value = $37.53):</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<em>click on chart to enlarge image</em>)(<em>chart last updated 6-5-</em>26)</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/CES0500000003_6-5-26-37.53.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="895" height="601" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/CES0500000003_6-5-26-37.53.png" alt="CES0500000003" class="wp-image-35371" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/CES0500000003_6-5-26-37.53.png 895w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/CES0500000003_6-5-26-37.53-300x201.png 300w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/CES0500000003_6-5-26-37.53-768x516.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 895px) 100vw, 895px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: Average Hourly Earnings of All Employees:  Total Private [CES0500000003] ; U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics; accessed June 5, 2026: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/CES0500000003</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">–</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This next chart depicts this same measure on a “Percentage Change From A Year Ago” basis. &nbsp;&nbsp;While not totally surprising, I find the decline from 2009 and subsequent trend to be disconcerting:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<em>click on chart to enlarge image</em>)(<em>chart last updated 6-5-26</em>)</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/CES0500000003_6-5-26-37.53-3.4-Percent-Change-From-Year-Ago-2.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="895" height="601" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/CES0500000003_6-5-26-37.53-3.4-Percent-Change-From-Year-Ago-2.png" alt="CES0500000003 Percent Change From Year Ago" class="wp-image-35372" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/CES0500000003_6-5-26-37.53-3.4-Percent-Change-From-Year-Ago-2.png 895w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/CES0500000003_6-5-26-37.53-3.4-Percent-Change-From-Year-Ago-2-300x201.png 300w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/CES0500000003_6-5-26-37.53-3.4-Percent-Change-From-Year-Ago-2-768x516.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 895px) 100vw, 895px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">–</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are slightly different measures available from a longer-term perspective. Pictured below is another measure, the Average Hourly Earnings of Production and Nonsupervisory Employees – Total Private (FRED series AHETPI)(current value = $32.31):</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(click on chart to enlarge image)(chart last updated 6-5-26)</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/AHETPI_6-5-26-32.31.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="895" height="601" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/AHETPI_6-5-26-32.31.png" alt="AHETPI" class="wp-image-35367" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/AHETPI_6-5-26-32.31.png 895w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/AHETPI_6-5-26-32.31-300x201.png 300w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/AHETPI_6-5-26-32.31-768x516.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 895px) 100vw, 895px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: Average Hourly Earnings of Production and Nonsupervisory Employees: Total Private [AHETPI] ; U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics; accessed June 5, 2026:<br>http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/AHETPI</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">–</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Pictured below is this AHETPI measure on a “Percentage Change From A Year Ago” basis. While not totally surprising, I find the decline from 2009 and subsequent trend to be disconcerting:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(click on chart to enlarge image)(chart last updated 6-5-26)</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/AHETPI_6-5-26-32.31-3.6-Percent-Change-From-Year-Ago.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="895" height="601" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/AHETPI_6-5-26-32.31-3.6-Percent-Change-From-Year-Ago.png" alt="AHETPI Percent Change From Year Ago" class="wp-image-35368" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/AHETPI_6-5-26-32.31-3.6-Percent-Change-From-Year-Ago.png 895w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/AHETPI_6-5-26-32.31-3.6-Percent-Change-From-Year-Ago-300x201.png 300w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/AHETPI_6-5-26-32.31-3.6-Percent-Change-From-Year-Ago-768x516.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 895px) 100vw, 895px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I will continue to actively monitor these trends, especially given the post-2009 dynamics.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">_________</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I post various economic indicators and indices because I believe they should be carefully monitored.&nbsp; However, as those familiar with this site are aware, I do not necessarily agree with what they depict or imply.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">_____</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/a-special-note-on-our-economic-situation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Special Note</a>&nbsp;summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>SPX at 7453.12 as this post is written</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/average-hourly-earnings-trends-158/">Average Hourly Earnings Trends</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">35364</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>U-3 And U-6 Unemployment Rate Long-Term Charts As Of June 5, 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/u-3-and-u-6-unemployment-rate-long-term-charts-as-of-june-5-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Kavadas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 15:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment rate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.economicgreenfield.com/?p=35359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Shortly after each monthly employment report I have been posting a continual series titled “3 Critical Unemployment Charts.” Of course, there are many other employment charts that can be displayed as well. For reference purposes, below are the U-3 and U-6 Unemployment Rate charts from a long-term historical perspective. &#160;Both charts are from the St. ... </p>
<p class="read-more-container"><a title="U-3 And U-6 Unemployment Rate Long-Term Charts As Of June 5, 2026" class="read-more button" href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/u-3-and-u-6-unemployment-rate-long-term-charts-as-of-june-5-2026/#more-35359" aria-label="Read more about U-3 And U-6 Unemployment Rate Long-Term Charts As Of June 5, 2026">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/u-3-and-u-6-unemployment-rate-long-term-charts-as-of-june-5-2026/">U-3 And U-6 Unemployment Rate Long-Term Charts As Of June 5, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Shortly after each monthly employment report I have been posting a continual series titled “<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/tag/median-duration-of-unemployment/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">3 Critical Unemployment Charts</a>.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Of course, there are many other employment charts that can be displayed as well.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For reference purposes, below are the U-3 and U-6 Unemployment Rate charts from a long-term historical perspective. &nbsp;Both charts are from the St. Louis Fed site. &nbsp;The U-3 measure is what is commonly referred to as the official unemployment rate; whereas the U-6 rate is officially (<a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">per Bureau of Labor Statistics</a>) defined as:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force</p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Of note, many economic observers use the U-6 rate as a (closer) proxy of the actual unemployment rate rather than that depicted by the U-3 measure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is the U-3 chart, currently showing a 4.3% unemployment rate:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/UNRATE_6-5-26-4.3-Percent.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="895" height="601" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/UNRATE_6-5-26-4.3-Percent.png" alt="UNRATE" class="wp-image-35360" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/UNRATE_6-5-26-4.3-Percent.png 895w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/UNRATE_6-5-26-4.3-Percent-300x201.png 300w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/UNRATE_6-5-26-4.3-Percent-768x516.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 895px) 100vw, 895px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: Civilian Unemployment Rate [UNRATE] ; U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics; accessed June 5, 2026: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UNRATE</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">–</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is the U-6 chart, currently showing a 8.1% unemployment rate:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/U6RATE_6-5-26-8.1-Percent.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="895" height="601" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/U6RATE_6-5-26-8.1-Percent.png" alt="U6RATE" class="wp-image-35361" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/U6RATE_6-5-26-8.1-Percent.png 895w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/U6RATE_6-5-26-8.1-Percent-300x201.png 300w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/U6RATE_6-5-26-8.1-Percent-768x516.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 895px) 100vw, 895px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: Total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers plus total employed part time for economic reasons  [U6RATE] ; U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics; accessed June 5, 2026:  http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/U6RATE</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">_____</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/a-special-note-on-our-economic-situation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Special Note</a>&nbsp;summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>SPX at 7490.50 as this post is written</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/u-3-and-u-6-unemployment-rate-long-term-charts-as-of-june-5-2026/">U-3 And U-6 Unemployment Rate Long-Term Charts As Of June 5, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">35359</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 Critical Unemployment Charts – June 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/3-critical-unemployment-charts-june-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Kavadas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 14:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[median duration of unemployment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.economicgreenfield.com/?p=35353</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As I have commented previously, as in the&#160;October 6, 2009 post (“A Note About Unemployment Statistics”), in my opinion the official methodologies used to measure the various job loss and unemployment statistics do not provide an accurate depiction; they serve to understate the severity of unemployment. However, even if one chooses to look at the ... </p>
<p class="read-more-container"><a title="3 Critical Unemployment Charts – June 2026" class="read-more button" href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/3-critical-unemployment-charts-june-2026/#more-35353" aria-label="Read more about 3 Critical Unemployment Charts – June 2026">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/3-critical-unemployment-charts-june-2026/">3 Critical Unemployment Charts – June 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As I have commented previously, as in the&nbsp;October 6, 2009 post (<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2009/10/06/a-note-about-unemployment-statistics/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">“A Note About Unemployment Statistics”</a>), in my opinion the official methodologies used to measure the various job loss and unemployment statistics do not provide an accurate depiction; they serve to understate the severity of unemployment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, even if one chooses to look at the official statistics, the following charts provide an interesting (and disconcerting) long-term perspective of certain aspects of the officially-stated unemployment (and, in the third chart, employment) situation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The three charts below are from the St. Louis Fed site.  Here is the Median Duration of Unemployment (current value = 11.6 weeks):</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<em>click on charts to enlarge images</em>)(charts updated as of 6-5-26)</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/UEMPMED_6-5-26-11.6-weeks.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="895" height="601" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/UEMPMED_6-5-26-11.6-weeks.png" alt="UEMPMED" class="wp-image-35355" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/UEMPMED_6-5-26-11.6-weeks.png 895w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/UEMPMED_6-5-26-11.6-weeks-300x201.png 300w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/UEMPMED_6-5-26-11.6-weeks-768x516.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 895px) 100vw, 895px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: Median Duration of Unemployment [UEMPMED] ; U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics; accessed June 5, 2026:  http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UEMPMED</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">–</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is the chart for Unemployed 27 Weeks and Over (current value = 1.988 million):</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/UEMP27OV_6-5-26-1988-1.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="895" height="601" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/UEMP27OV_6-5-26-1988-1.png" alt="UEMP27OV" class="wp-image-35356" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/UEMP27OV_6-5-26-1988-1.png 895w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/UEMP27OV_6-5-26-1988-1-300x201.png 300w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/UEMP27OV_6-5-26-1988-1-768x516.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 895px) 100vw, 895px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: Civilians Unemployed for 27 Weeks and Over [UEMP27OV] ; U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics; accessed June 5, 2026: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/UEMP27OV</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">–</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is the chart for Total Nonfarm Payroll (current value = 159.001 million):</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/PAYEMS_6-5-26-159001.png" target="_blank" rel=" noreferrer noopener"><img decoding="async" width="895" height="601" src="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/PAYEMS_6-5-26-159001.png" alt="PAYEMS" class="wp-image-35357" srcset="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/PAYEMS_6-5-26-159001.png 895w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/PAYEMS_6-5-26-159001-300x201.png 300w, https://www.economicgreenfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/PAYEMS_6-5-26-159001-768x516.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 895px) 100vw, 895px" /></a></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data Source: FRED, Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: All Employees: Total Nonfarm [PAYEMS] ; U.S. Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics; accessed June 5, 2026:  https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/PAYEMS</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">–</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Our unemployment problem is severe. &nbsp;The underlying dynamics of the current – and especially future – unemployment situation remain exceedingly worrisome. &nbsp;These dynamics are numerous and complex, and greatly lack recognition and understanding.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">My commentary regarding unemployment is generally found in the “<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/category/unemployment/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Unemployment</a>” category. &nbsp;This commentary includes the page titled&nbsp;“<a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/u-s-unemployment-trends/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">U.S. Unemployment Trends</a>,” which discusses various problematical issues concerning the present and future employment situation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">_____</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>The&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/a-special-note-on-our-economic-situation/" target="_blank">Special Note</a>&nbsp;summarizes my overall thoughts about our economic situation</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>SPX at 7519.23 as this post is written</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com/2026/06/05/3-critical-unemployment-charts-june-2026/">3 Critical Unemployment Charts – June 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.economicgreenfield.com">EconomicGreenfield</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">35353</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
