<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>blog.ecorrado.us</title>
	
	<link>http://blog.ecorrado.us</link>
	<description>Ramblings about library technology, open source software, and other adventures!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:22:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ecorradorss2" /><feedburner:info uri="ecorradorss2" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Top 11 College rankings</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ecorradorss2/~3/JfbMKnQxE3U/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2012/10/14/top-11-college-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ecorrado</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[top10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ecorrado.us/?p=1116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are my first rankings for the 2012 college football season. I normally do the top 10, but since there are 11 undefeated teams that are eligible for the bowl games, I&#8217;ll include all of them. Ohio State is 7-0 but they do not get a slot in my pole based on there ineligibility status. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are my first rankings for the 2012 college football season. I normally do the top 10, but since there are 11 undefeated teams that are eligible for the bowl games, I&#8217;ll include all of them. Ohio State is 7-0 but they do not get a slot in my pole based on there ineligibility status. I&#8217;m not sure where they would go in my rankings, but they would be in the bottom half of the 12 undefeated teams. As per past year, I look at out-of-conference games (which teams can control more then in-conference) a lot more favorable than some others and rank more on results then potential. For example, if you look like you have a great team, but thus far have played a weak schedule, you&#8217;ll probably be lower then a team that doesn&#8217;t &#8220;look&#8221; as good. This does mean, however, as the season moves on, my top 10 won&#8217;t be static since it isn&#8217;t based on predictions.</p>
<ol>
<li>Notre Dame (6-0): I know many are not believers yet, but they have three wins over teams that were in the AP top 20 at the time (including one on the road). They have two really tough road games coming up though. At Oklahoma (Oct 27) and at USC (Nov 24).</li>
<li>Oregon State: Two wins over top 20 AP teams including a win out-of-conference against then AP #13 Wisconsin. That win puts them above in-state rival Oregon in my pole.</li>
<li>Florida (6-0): Another cream puff schedule from an “elite” SEC team. They will have one tough out of conference game though, but that isn&#8217;t until November 24 against Florida State. Good wins on the road against Texas A&#038;M and LSU puts them ahead of Alabama.</li>
<li>Kansas State (6-0): They blew out Miami in an out-of-conference game and beat (then #6) Oklahoma on the road. The Miami win would be better of the U was better this season, but still at least they were willing to schedule them.</li>
<li>Rutgers (6-0): Rutgers gets the top ranking of the Big East undefeated based on there out-of-conference road win at Arkansas. Next week they are at Temple which is an underrated team but Rutgers should still be able to beat them. If they do, they have a good chance of going into their November 17 road game against Cincinnati with a 9-0 record</li>
<li>Cincinnati (6-0). I considered putting them above Rutgers with there 27-24 win in D.C. Against Virginia Tech, but decided that overall Rutgers has had the tougher schedule thus far. A win ar Louisville next week may have them jump the Scarlet Knights, however. </li>
<li>Alabama (6-0): I know the pundits love them, but they haven&#8217;t had any real tough away games yet. Actually, they only have one all season (LSU) although Arkansas should have been better early on (I think Arkansas has talent, but we will see as the season moves on if the ship can be righted). Still, &#8216;Bama gets credit for the win on a neutral site over Michigan and because they haven&#8217;t let anyone come even close to beating them. They will move up in my rankings if they keep winning though as they have some tougher games like the aforementioned one at LSU latter in the season<./li>
<li>Louisville (6-0) Good out-of-conference wins against Kentucky and North Carolina but both games were at home. In two weeks Cincinnati comes in for a visit. That should be a great game.</li>
<li>Ohio (7-0): The only 7 win team in my rankings gets into the top 10 with season-opening a road victory at Penn State.</li>
<li>Oregon (6-0): Arkansas State, Fresno State, Tennessee Tech? I guess they don&#8217;t like to be challenged out of conference. Only one road game at 2-5 Washington State so far. Really need to see more from them but their schedule is back-heavy so they have a chance to move up.</li>
<li>Mississippi State (6-0): Best win so far was at Kentucky or maybe home against Tennessee. Out of conference games include Jackson State, Troy, South Alabama, and Middle Tennessee. Consider me unimpressed. We won&#8217;t have a clue on how good they are until Oct 27 when the go on the road against Alabama.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2012/10/14/top-11-college-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2012/10/14/top-11-college-rankings/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Closed Stacks</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ecorradorss2/~3/VPZ1N6K51aM/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2012/02/19/closed-stacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 15:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ecorrado</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[libraries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ecorrado.us/?p=1110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an interesting post on the Oxford University Press&#8217;s blog by Michael Levine-Clark, &#8220;An academic librarian without a library.&#8221; In truth, Michael does have a library, but it is being renovated and what he means is he doesn&#8217;t currently have a library with open stacks. In Europe, closed stacks are a more common occurrence [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an interesting post on the Oxford University Press&#8217;s blog by Michael Levine-Clark, &#8220;<a href="http://blog.oup.com/2012/02/academic-librarian-without-library/">An academic librarian without a library.</a>&#8221; In truth, Michael does have a library, but it is being renovated and what he means is he doesn&#8217;t currently have a library with open stacks. In Europe, closed stacks are a more common occurrence then in the United States. In the U.S. people have become accustomed to being able to browse open stacks and many faculty, students and librarians think going to closed stacks would be a loss. However, with many academic librarians being on prime campus real estate and the needs for the library to serve other uses, such as being an Information Commons, moving a portion of the physical collections off-site is becoming more and more common. It is a trend I don&#8217;t see going the other way anytime soon.</p>
<p>At the University of Denver where Michael Levine-Clark as Collections Librarian and Professor, the library is closed for renovations. Originally up to <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_18004670">80% of the psychical collections was to remain off-site</a> but after an uproar from students and faculty <a href="http://www.du.edu/ascend/news-half-of-penrose-collection-to-return-to-library.html">50% of the collection is set to return after renovations</a>. Michael&#8217;s blog post details how &#8220;every comment I’ve heard from faculty and students about the temporary dislocation [of stacks] has been positive&#8221; and &#8220;raises the question of what exactly a library is.&#8221;</p>
<p>While browsing may not be, as Michael says, &#8220;an ideal way&#8221; of finding books no one single way is and no amount of technology will change that. The serendipity of finding something you are not looking for is far less likely in online environments and I think that is a big loss. I wonder if the lack of access to the physical collection via browsing is not getting as much negative reaction because faculty and students know that the library is being renovated and that it is a temporary inconvenience and when the renovations are done half of the collections will return to open stacks? Browsing stacks might not be the best way to find ALL books on the topic you can get, but it is probably the most efficient way to find and access SOME physical books on a topic. Depending on the users&#8217; needs at the time, that is often just what they want. It certainly works for the cook book and travel sections at my local Barnes and Noble and unless they typical undergrad is different then i was in college (which they may very well be the case but I&#8217;m skeptical) it serves there purpose most of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2012/02/19/closed-stacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2012/02/19/closed-stacks/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Symlinking MySQL data files</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ecorradorss2/~3/Psx6T05OMmM/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2012/01/19/symlinking-mysql-data-files/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ecorrado</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ecorrado.us/?p=1106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to space issues, I had to move my MySQL data files (/var/lib/mysql) on a Ubuntu box to another file system. I did that and created a symlink, but MySQL would not start. It turns out to be an easy fix. I found a post on MySQL Forums from someone who had a similar problem, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to space issues, I had to move my MySQL data files (/var/lib/mysql) on a Ubuntu box to another file system. I did that and created a symlink, but MySQL would not start. It turns out to be an easy fix. I found a post on MySQL Forums from someone who had a similar problem, and someone named Richard Guy posted my solution:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Did you fix the apparmor config file for mysqld and restart apparmor?</p>
<p>first you need to edit /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld and add the new fully qualified (ie, no symbolic link) path(s). [you may want to leave the original /var/lib/mysql entries intact <img src='http://blog.ecorrado.us/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ]</p>
<p>then &#8220;restart&#8221; apparmor:</p>
<p>sudo invoke-rc.d apparmor reload</p>
<p>for more info, see<a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AppArmor"> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AppArmor</a> </p></blockquote>
<p>I edited the file as appropriate, and MySQL started fine and now I don&#8217;t have to worry about my disk space filling up again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2012/01/19/symlinking-mysql-data-files/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2012/01/19/symlinking-mysql-data-files/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Is that annonymous e-mail annonymous?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ecorradorss2/~3/t6ekPyVJLgM/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2012/01/17/is-that-annonymous-e-mail-annonymous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 02:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ecorrado</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ecorrado.us/?p=1101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A friend on facebook posted a link the other day to an article about University of Illinois President Michael Hogan&#8217;s chief of staff resigning after an anonymous e-mail was sent to the University Senates Conference from a Yahoo! e-mail account. I don&#8217;t know much about what is happening at the University of Illinois but I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend on facebook posted a link the other day to an article about University of Illinois President Michael Hogan&#8217;s chief of staff resigning after an anonymous e-mail was sent to the University Senates Conference from a Yahoo! e-mail account. I don&#8217;t know much about what is happening at the University of Illinois but I was intrigued about the attempt at anonymous e-mail. </p>
<p>The article stated that a computer science professor, <a href="http://cs.illinois.edu/people/faculty/roy-campbell">Roy Campbell</a>, was able to determine that the emails may have been sent by someone in the president&#8217;s office. The initial article I read didn&#8217;t say how the computer science professor figured that out so I thought he might have looked at the e-mail headers. I did some checking with e-mails sent to my personal e-mail account from people with Yahoo! addresses and found that, indeed, Yahoo! e-mail does include the senders ip address in the header (actual IP replaced by XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX):</p>
<blockquote><p>Received: from [XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX] by web112906.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:11:28 PST</p></blockquote>
<p>However, I came across another article that had a little more information and while I don&#8217;t know that Dr. Campbell didn&#8217;t look at the headers (I imagine he did), he also found some clues as to where the e-mail was sent from because the person who sent them composed the e-mail using Microsoft Word and then pasted the content into the Yahoo! Mail. A Chicago Tribune article noted Dr. Campbell as saying &#8220;<a href="ttp://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-01-08/news/ct-met-u-of-i-investigation-0108-20120108_1_emails-professor-faculty-member">One should also be careful writing anonymous email using (Microsoft) Word <img src='http://blog.ecorrado.us/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</a>&#8221; </p>
<p>I did some testing with cut and pasting from Microsoft Word and I wasn&#8217;t able to find any personally identifying information in the mark-up that comes across when you don&#8217;t send the e-mail as plain text via Yahoo! but I am sure that depending on your configuration and version of Word it could happen.</p>
<p>I think the take-away from this story in regards to e-mail is that you should never assume any e-mail you send is truly anonymous. It is true that you can make it &#8220;more anonymous&#8221; and harder to figure out depending on how you sent it and what tools you used, but unless you really take great lengths and know what you are doing, given enough resources if someone wants to enough where an e-mail came from thy can probably can figure it out or come close enough. Maybe not enough for a court of law, but enough that you&#8217;ll probably wish you didn&#8217;t send it. While it was a computer science professor that first figured out the e-mail was probably not from someone on the committee, it really wouldn&#8217;t have taken a computer genius in this case to figure out where it may have come from. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2012/01/17/is-that-annonymous-e-mail-annonymous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2012/01/17/is-that-annonymous-e-mail-annonymous/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Worldcat record use policy causes National Library of Sweden to end negotiatons with OCLC</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ecorradorss2/~3/YBIoMe4husg/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/12/22/sweden-oclc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ecorrado</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ecorrado.us/?p=1098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Library of Sweden has decided to end negotiations with OCLC about uploading their union catalog, Libris, into WorldCat as well as using WorldCat as a source of records in Libris. According to the announcement, Libris is and needs to remain an open database and OCLC&#8217;s WorldCat Rights and Responsibilities for the OCLC Cooperative [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.kb.se/english/about/news/No-deal-with-OCLC/">National Library of Sweden has decided to end negotiations with OCLC</a> about uploading their union catalog, <a href="http://libris.kb.se/">Libris</a>, into WorldCat as well as using WorldCat as a source of records in Libris. According to the announcement, Libris is and needs to remain an open database and OCLC&#8217;s <a href="http://www.oclc.org/worldcat/recorduse/policy/default.htm">WorldCat Rights and Responsibilities for the OCLC Cooperative</a> does not make that possible. The National Library also believes that the record use terms would make it impossible to contribute biographical data to Europeana and the European Library. As Karen Coyle mentions in her <a href="http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2011/12/national-library-of-sweden-and-oclc.html">blog post about this decision</a>,  open data (or the lack of it) is not just an idealogical stance: it &#8220;has real practical applications.&#8221; Whatever good the WorldCat record use policy has had, this is a real-world example of how it can (and in this case, has) also harm libraries &#8211; including OCLC member libraries who will not be able to access Libris records via WorldCat. </p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.libraryjournal.com/lj/home/893131-264/national_library_of_sweden_no.html.csp">Library Journal</a></em> contacted OCLC about the announcement, but they did not immediately respond to LJ&#8217;s request for comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/12/22/sweden-oclc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/12/22/sweden-oclc/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>MITx</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ecorradorss2/~3/bqzeZPwcjts/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/12/20/mitx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 21:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ecorrado</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ecorrado.us/?p=1094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of you probably have seen MIT&#8217;s announcement of MITx on December 19. Basically, “MITx will offer a portfolio of MIT courses through an online interactive learning platform.” It will “operate on an open-source, scalable software infrastructure” and offer many features that current learning Management Systems offer as well as some other unique features. While [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of you probably have seen MIT&#8217;s <a href="http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2011/mitx-education-initiative-1219.html">announcement of <em>MITx</em></a> on December 19. Basically, “<em>MITx</em> will offer a portfolio of MIT courses through an online interactive learning platform.” It will “operate on an open-source, scalable software infrastructure” and offer many features that current learning Management Systems offer as well as some other unique features. While the technology sounds interesting, I am most interested in the program itself, in particular the credentialing. MIT has been a leader in the open education with its <a href="http://ocw.mit.edu/index.htm">OpenCourseWare</a> project, but adding a level of credentialing is a huge step. There isn&#8217;t  a lot of information available yet, but basically if you want to learn, you can do that for fee. If you want some form of credential, there will be a fee for that. The credential will be a certificate of completion that will be offered buy a not-for-profit body within the Institute created to do such a thing. The body offering the credentials will be distinctly named to avoid confusion that MIT “proper” awarded the credential and costs are yet to be determined.</p>
<p><em>MITx</em> has yet to announce what classes will be available but they plan to start offering classes in Spring 2012. More information can be found on the <a href="http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2011/mitx-faq-1219"><em>MITx</em> announcement FAQ</a>.  If they have something I am interested in and it fits my schedule, I may try to take a class and, if I do, I&#8217;ll probably pay for the credential. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/12/20/mitx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/12/20/mitx/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>First Top 10 of the 2011 College Football Season</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ecorradorss2/~3/m3nOg49wb_g/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/10/10/first-top-10-of-the-2011-college-football-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 03:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ecorrado</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[top10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ecorrado.us/?p=1089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is my top 10. As a reminder, my top 10 is based on performance not &#8220;predictions&#8221; of the future. This is why I don&#8217;t start the pole until October. I also add weight for the portion of schedule the school can control (out of conference). Scheduling cupcakes is not looked on favorably in my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my top 10. As a reminder, my top 10 is based on performance not &#8220;predictions&#8221; of the future. This is why I don&#8217;t start the pole until October. I also add weight for the portion of schedule the school can control (out of conference). Scheduling cupcakes is not looked on favorably in my pole.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>LSU</strong> (6-0). Normally I ping the SEC teams for their out of conference schedules. Well, LSU stepped it up and played Oregon (neutral field, but more home than away) and West Virginia, so kudos for them. They get the #1 vote for the first week of my standings this year. </li>
<li><strong>Boise State</strong> (5-0). Once again Boise State opens on the road against a “big time team” and shows it can play with anyone. Boise State haters, why don’t you schedule a game up in Idaho against them in November and prove they can’t beat you?</li>
<li><strong>Oklahoma</strong> (5-0). They had a few out of conference cupcakes but going on the road to play what many thought was a top 5 Florida State team shows me something. The impressive Texas win counter-acts the Missouri game where I don’t think they looked as good.</li>
<li><strong>Clemson</strong> (6-0). Nice road win at Auburn out of conference followed by good in-conference wins against Florida State and Virginia Tech puts Clemson in my top 5.</li>
<li><strong>Kansas State</strong> (5-0). I now the Florida schools haven’t been impressive these year, but K-State gets credit for an out of conference win at Miami (FL) and good conference wins at home against Baylor and Missouri. </li>
<li><strong>Alabama</strong> (6-0). Beating Penn State at Penn State is a good win even if Penn State isn’t that good. The other out of conference games were against cream puffs though. Good in conference wins against Florida and Arkansas help them a bit in my rankings.</li>
<li><strong>Illinois</strong> (6-0). Didn’t really know where to put the Illini. The victory against Arizona State who is 3-0 in the PAC-10 was impressive but the rest of the schedule is lacking. Once they play a few of the better Big-10 teams they will probably fall out of my top 10, but my picks are based on what they did so far, not based on my predictions of the future.</li>
<li><strong>Oklahoma State</strong> (5-0). Despite putting up 70 against conference foe Kansas, I am not sold on the Cowboys. Toughest out of conference game was Arizona who is 1-5. A few props to the victory over Tulsa though as at least it is an in-state match-up.</li>
<li><strong>Michigan</strong> (6-0). Nice out of conference win against Notre Dame. Notre Dame might not be the most impressive team but they only have one other loss (to South Florida). Rest of out of conference schedule could use some work. </li>
<li><strong>Georgia Tech</strong> (6-0). Only out of conference game even worth speaking about was at Kansas. Beating Kansas in a basketball game is impressive, in football not so much. Still, at least they went on the road once against another BCS school out of conference. Should be interesting if they remain undefeated going onto the Oct 29 matchup with Clemson.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/10/10/first-top-10-of-the-2011-college-football-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/10/10/first-top-10-of-the-2011-college-football-season/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>What I did on my September Vacation</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ecorradorss2/~3/WxKV8e5Js4Q/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/10/05/what-i-did-on-my-september-vacation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 21:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ecorrado</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ecorrado.us/?p=1085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I took off from work for some vacation, but I didn&#8217;t leave the library world behind. In fact, I co-presented a Webinar, &#8220;Cloud computing and libraries: The view from 10,000 feet, with Dr. Heather Lea Moulaison that was put on by Education Institute (Canada) and the Neal-Schuman Professional Education Network (USA), talked to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week I took off from work for some vacation, but I didn&#8217;t leave the library world behind. In fact, I co-presented a Webinar, &#8220;<a href="http://www.thepartnership.ca/partnership/bins/calendar_page.asp?cid=2488-2321-4277">Cloud computing and libraries: The view from 10,000 feet</a>, with <a href="http://moulaison.net/">Dr. Heather Lea Moulaison</a> that was put on by Education Institute (Canada) and the Neal-Schuman Professional Education Network (USA), talked to an LIS class at the University of Missouri (incidentally, I was very impressed by the students), and attended and co-presented a session with Dr. Moulaison at the LITA National Forum. </p>
<p>I skipped the last couple of LITAs National Forums as in the past I have not found them as useful for me as some other conferences I go to. With limited travel budgets, you need to look for value. LITA does not appear to be highly subsidized by sponsors and isn&#8217;t a cheap conference compared to other library conferences and the content has been a little weak in my areas. However when an opportunity to present with my co-editor, Heather Lea Moulaison, of <a href="http://www.neal-schuman.com/gscc">Getting Started with Cloud Computing: A LITA Guide</a> in her home state emerged, I figure, hey, why not? What else am I going to do with these vacation days? If I don&#8217;t use some, I&#8217;ll lose them, so I might as well hang out with some library peeps. </p>
<p>I am not going to review the whole conference but I was happy to see what seemed like an increase in sessions that were more advanced (technology-wise). It isn&#8217;t that past Forums were bad, I just wasn&#8217;t the proper audience. Kudos to this year&#8217;s program planners. I&#8217;d like to see less long breaks and it seemed odd that the posters were at the end of the day Saturday with no food or refreshment, but oh well. While I am on it, this isn&#8217;t just a LITA thing, but I think at most conferences sessions are too long. I&#8217;d much rather see two 25 minute presentations then one fifty minute one. I think this is were <a href="http://code4lib.org/conference">Code4Lib</a> with it&#8217;s 20 minute time slots does a real good job. Library Journal has a <a href="http://www.libraryjournal.com/lj/home/892285-264/lita_national_forum_2011_practically.html.csp">good review of the 2011 LITA National Forum</a> (and I&#8217;m not just saying that because they liked our presentation, although I&#8217;m pleased that they did.</p>
<p>The slides from our LITA presentation, <a href="http://codabox.org/89/">Practical Approaches to Cloud Computing at YOUR Library</a>, are available on <a href="http://codabox.org/">CodaBox</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/10/05/what-i-did-on-my-september-vacation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/10/05/what-i-did-on-my-september-vacation/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Webinar on Digital Preservation tommorow</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ecorradorss2/~3/BtdtUQz-IB4/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/09/19/webinar-on-digital-preservation-tommorow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ecorrado</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ecorrado.us/?p=1081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow (Tuesday, September 20, 2011) I will be one of two people presenting a Library Journal Webinar called Low Maintenance, High Value: How Binghamton University Libraries Used Digital Preservation to Increase its Value on Campus. My Co-presenter is Ido Peled, Rosetta Product Manager, Ex Libris Group. Ex Libris is also a cosponsor. The abstract of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow (Tuesday, September 20, 2011) I will be one of two people presenting a Library Journal Webinar called L<a href="http://www.libraryjournal.com/lj/tools/webcast/891796-388/low_maintenance_high_value_how.html.csp">ow Maintenance, High Value: How Binghamton University Libraries Used Digital Preservation to Increase its Value on Campus</a>. My Co-presenter is Ido Peled, Rosetta Product Manager, <a href="http://exlibrisgroup.com/">Ex Libris Group</a>. Ex Libris is also a cosponsor.  The abstract of our talk is:</p>
<blockquote><p>Is end-to-end Digital Preservation here today? Does it require an army of staff to manage? Is it a library function or a central IT function? Answer these questions and more while hearing Edward Corrado tell the story of turning the Binghamton University Libraries into the university&#8217;s identity and heritage storehouse.</p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently you can register now and they will send you a link to the webcast is archived for your viewing pleasure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/09/19/webinar-on-digital-preservation-tommorow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/09/19/webinar-on-digital-preservation-tommorow/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Major College athletic conference reallignment</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ecorradorss2/~3/ZWcsvpdupPk/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/09/17/major-college-athletic-conference-reallignment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 21:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ecorrado</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[top10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ecorrado.us/?p=1078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Syracuse and Pitt most likely headed to the ACC and the Big 12 falling apart, I think a few more teams will leave the Big East. I don&#8217;t think any of them will go to the ACC though, or they would be going with Syracuse &#038; Pitt. I predict Rutgers will be one of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/18/sports/big-east-exit-is-said-to-begin-for-syracuse-and-pittsburgh.html">Syracuse and Pitt most likely headed to the ACC</a> and the <a href="http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/6927204/pac-16-oklahoma-sooners-texas-longhorns-being-discussed-source-says">Big 12 falling apart</a>, I think a few more teams will leave the Big East. I don&#8217;t think any of them will go to the ACC though, or they would be going with Syracuse &#038; Pitt. I predict Rutgers will be one of the teams that leaves and they will go to the Big 10. Possibly with UCONN and 2 Big 12 teams (Missouri? Kansas? Iowa State?) to make the Big 10 have 16 teams.</p>
<p>West Virginia will end up in the SEC with Texas A&#038;M and maybe another Big 12 team (Missouri?)</p>
<p>I think Kansas and K-State may both end up in the ACC with Syracuse and Pitt &#8212; assuming Kansas doesn&#8217;t end up in the Big 10. K-State will probably not go to the ACC unless they are brought in with Kansas. Texas is also a possibility if the ACC lets them keep their <a href="http://espn.go.com/longhornnetwork/">Longhorn Network</a>.</p>
<p>Texas, Texas Tech, OK, OK-State all to the PAC-16.</p>
<p>The Big East will pick up the best teams left and will still be in good shape. Big 12 will be history.</p>
<p>Still don&#8217;t see Notre Dame joining a conference in football. BYU would fit in the PAC-12, but the PAC-12  won&#8217;t take them because of the religious affiliation.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see anyone from the ACC, PAC-12, SEC, or Big 10 swapping conference &#8211; although if Florida State or someone else from the ACC jumps to the SEC I wouldn&#8217;t be shocked. Likewise, Maryland to the Big10 wouldn&#8217;t total shock me but it will cost each of those teams $20m to bail out so I doubt it will happen. But really, who knows.</p>
<p>The real moral of this story is the Big 12 really messed up by not adding teams when Colorado and Nebraska left. Sticking with 10 left them ripe for picking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/09/17/major-college-athletic-conference-reallignment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.ecorrado.us/2011/09/17/major-college-athletic-conference-reallignment/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
