<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Election Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://electionlawblog.org/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://electionlawblog.org/</link>
	<description>The law of politics and the politics of law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 01:02:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Breaking: Supreme Court Over the Dissent of At Least Justice Jackson, Breaks Its Usual Procedural Rules to Allow Louisiana to Minimize Black Voting Rights in the Middle of an Ongoing Election</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155898</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155898</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Talk about adding <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a1197_097c.pdf">insult </a>to <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/callais.pdf">injury.</a> After the Supreme Court&#8217;s disastrous <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/callais.pdf">ruling </a>in the Callais case last week effectively killing off a key part of the Voting Rights Act protecting minority voters, there was a question about whether the ruling&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155898" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155898">Breaking: Supreme Court Over the Dissent of At Least Justice Jackson, Breaks Its Usual Procedural Rules to Allow Louisiana to Minimize Black Voting Rights in the Middle of an Ongoing Election</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump Again &#8220;Jokes&#8221; About Staying in Office Beyond the End of His Second Term</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155896</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 20:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[authoritarian threats in US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>One purpose of this talk about staying in office another another &#8220;eight or nine years&#8221; is of course to<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3ml2hewgyjb23"> inflame liberals. </a>The response is always that liberals cannot take a joke, at least when the joke is about violating the&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155896" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155896">Trump Again &#8220;Jokes&#8221; About Staying in Office Beyond the End of His Second Term</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;DeSantis signs Florida&#8217;s new GOP-friendly congressional map into law — but lawsuits likely loom&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155894</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[redistricting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155894</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/04/florida-desantis-map-sign-redistricting-00905256?nid=0000015a-dd3e-d536-a37b-dd7fd8af0000&#38;nname=playbook-pm&#38;nrid=6cac24ff-810e-41c2-a6d3-5e08fa810a53">Politico:</a></p>
<p>The new map was&#160;<a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/29/florida-legislature-redistricting-map-desantis-gop-00898457" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">approved just days ago by the GOP-controlled Legislature</a>&#160;and was put into place one week after the governor’s office delivered it to state legislators. Democrats have repeatedly called the map “illegal” and a power grab&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155894" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155894">&#8220;DeSantis signs Florida&#8217;s new GOP-friendly congressional map into law — but lawsuits likely loom&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Trump keeps saying the quiet part out loud on changes to the 2026 election&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155892</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[authoritarian threats in US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155892</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/04/politics/trump-gerrymandering-2026-midterm-elections">Aaron Blake</a> for CNN:</p>
<p>“The Republicans should say — we should take over the voting in at least 15 places,” Trump said. “The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting.” His comments came less than a week after the FBI had&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155892" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155892">&#8220;Trump keeps saying the quiet part out loud on changes to the 2026 election&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Callais&#8217;s &#8220;Wrecking Ball&#8221; Makes It to SNL</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155888</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 17:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election law "humor"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155888</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-under-roberts-takes-wrecking-ball-voting-rights-act-2026-04-30/">told </a>John Kruzel of Reuters: &#8220;&#8221;The metaphor is a wrecking ball, . . .There are still parts of the VRA that are operative, but the two main pillars are now virtually dead letters.&#8221;</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBJ_H-r7Kns">Michael Che</a> on SNL&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155888" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155888">Callais&#8217;s &#8220;Wrecking Ball&#8221; Makes It to SNL</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats Don&#8217;t Face a Tragic Choice</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155864</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 14:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.ms.now/opinion/supreme-court-redistricting-voting-rights-act-democrats">Rick H.</a> and others have suggested that Democrats in blue states face a tragic choice in the wake of Callais. Either they must keep their current congressional maps &#8212; thereby failing to offset new red state gerrymanders that dismantle minority-opportunity&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155864" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155864">Democrats Don&#8217;t Face a Tragic Choice</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Supreme Court keeps overturning precedent. It swears that it’s not&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155883</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Pildes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 14:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>From John Fritze at<a href=""> CNN:</a></p>
<p>Still bruising from anger on the left over the court’s monumental decision three years earlier to <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/24/politics/dobbs-mississippi-supreme-court-abortion-roe-wade">overturn Roe v. Wade</a>, Roberts rattled off a series of stats underscoring that his court — the Roberts&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155883" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155883">&#8220;The Supreme Court keeps overturning precedent. It swears that it’s not&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Inside Democratic Fundraiser ActBlue’s Big Spending and Internal Drama&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155881</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 14:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicanery]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/inside-democratic-fundraiser-actblues-big-spending-and-internal-drama-1ae5d0b5?mod=politics_lead_pos3">WSJ:</a></p>
<p>Following Democrats’ bruising losses in the 2024 election, the chief executive of ActBlue, the platform that had helped Democrats raise $4 billion for that year’s contests, gathered staff for a four-day retreat.</p>
<p>One of the first topics of the&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155881" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155881">&#8220;Inside Democratic Fundraiser ActBlue’s Big Spending and Internal Drama&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nick Bagley, at NYU Democracy Project, With a Critique of Public-Sector Unions</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155879</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Pildes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 14:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Nick Bagley is the Thomas G. Long Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School.  in 2020 and 2022, he served as special counsel and then chief legal counsel to Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.  Here&#8217;s an excerpt from&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155879" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155879">Nick Bagley, at NYU Democracy Project, With a Critique of Public-Sector Unions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Norm Ornstein: &#8220;SCOTUS&#8217;s Brazen Power Grab Guts Voting Rights&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155877</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 14:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155877</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.contrariannews.org/p/scotuss-brazen-power-grab-guts-voting?r=154j9&#38;utm_medium=ios&#38;triedRedirect=true">Norm</a> at The Contrarian:</p>
<p>Now to Article III. The Framers did not expect that the judiciary would usurp the powers of the first branch. They created a Supreme Court and gave Congress power to establish lower courts as well. They&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155877" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155877">Norm Ornstein: &#8220;SCOTUS&#8217;s Brazen Power Grab Guts Voting Rights&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latner, Charles, and Fuentes-Rohwer: &#8220;The best response to the Supreme Court’s Callais ruling: proportional representation&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155875</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 14:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative voting systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155875</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Michael Latner, Guy Chalres, and Luis Fuentes-Rohwer at <a href="https://www.ms.now/opinion/supreme-court-callais-voting-rights-act-reform-proportional-representation">MS NOW</a> Opinion:</p>
<p>The day after the Supreme Court&#160;<a href="https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/supreme-court-louisiana-redistricting-map-callais">gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act</a>&#160;in&#160;<a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-109_21o3.pdf">Louisiana v. Callais</a>, Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry&#160;<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/04/29/louisiana-house-primaries-suspend-jeff-landry/">issued an executive order</a>&#160;purporting to&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155875" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155875">Latner, Charles, and Fuentes-Rohwer: &#8220;The best response to the Supreme Court’s Callais ruling: proportional representation&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Redistricting war accelerates winner-take-all political combat that’s straining American democracy&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155873</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 14:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[political polarization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redistricting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155873</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-supreme-court-redistricting-democracy-d8fcd9fd2dd60cb2233e8003fadc6300">Nick Riccardi f</a>or AP:</p>
<p>Willie Simon stood outside the Memphis motel where Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated in 1968, now a museum dedicated to the Civil Rights Movement.</p>
<p>Days after the U.S. Supreme Court&#160;<a href="https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-voting-rights-act-louisiana-alabama-4e3225083caccda5ec73a98533a79add">gutted a key </a>&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155873" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155873">&#8220;Redistricting war accelerates winner-take-all political combat that’s straining American democracy&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Breaking down the redistricting arms race following the Supreme Court&#8217;s VRA ruling&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155871</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 14:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/04/breaking-down-the-redistricting-arms-race-00904113?nname=playbook&#38;nid=0000014f-1646-d88f-a1cf-5f46b7bd0000&#38;nrid=0000014e-f109-dd93-ad7f-f90d0def0000">Politico</a> reports.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155871">&#8220;Breaking down the redistricting arms race following the Supreme Court&#8217;s VRA ruling&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Alito Claims to &#8216;Update&#8217; Voting Rights Act Law. Kagan Says He Destroyed It.&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155869</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155869</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.law.com/2026/05/01/alito-claims-to-update-voting-rights-act-law-kagan-says-he-destroyed-it/?kw=Alito+Claims+to+%27Update%27+Voting+Rights+Act+Law.+Kagan+Says+He+Destroyed+It.&#38;utm_source=email&#38;utm_medium=enl&#38;utm_campaign=newsroomupdate&#38;utm_content=20260504&#38;utm_term=law&#38;oly_enc_id=5456C5900423I9Y&#38;user_id=636dbf2701e379a7d108a2dd&#38;slreturn=20260504095959">Jimmy Hoover </a>for Law.com:</p>
<p>Justice Samuel Alito Jr. insisted in Wednesday&#8217;s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that he was not overruling the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s Voting Rights Act precedents, but critics say it leaves the landmark 1965 law a dried&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155869" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155869">&#8220;Alito Claims to &#8216;Update&#8217; Voting Rights Act Law. Kagan Says He Destroyed It.&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;He spent 60 years building Black political power. He sees a wipeout coming.&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155862</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 22:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155862</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/05/03/voting-rights-act-louisiana-black-candidates/">WaPo:</a></p>
<p>Press Robinson had to show he could read, before he was allowed to become the first member of his family to vote in the 1950s. In the 1970s, he filed a trailblazing lawsuit that cleared the way for him&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155862" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155862">&#8220;He spent 60 years building Black political power. He sees a wipeout coming.&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Behind Voting Rights Case, a Clash Over the Reality of Racism&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155860</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 22:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155860</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/03/us/politics/supreme-court-voting-rights-act.html">NYT:</a></p>
<p>In 1965, the year Congress passed the Voting Rights Act, it did not take much detective work to discover how some of the South’s most powerful white politicians felt about their Black neighbors.</p>
<p>Senator James Eastland, a Democrat from&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155860" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155860">&#8220;Behind Voting Rights Case, a Clash Over the Reality of Racism&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;‘Lines are going to change’: Trump DOJ confirms it will target minority voters nationwide after Supreme Court ruling&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155854</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 19:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155854</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/trump-doj-confirms-it-will-target-minority-voters-nationwide-after-supreme-court-ruling/">Democracy Docket</a>:</p>
<p>The Trump administration&#160;<a href="https://x.com/AAGDhillon/status/2050320100675190927?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">confirmed</a>&#160;Friday it will target Black and Latino-majority voting districts across the country — using the Supreme Court’s recent decision&#160;<a href="https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/scotus-smothers-voting-rights-act-greenlighting-racial-discrimination-and-a-rash-of-gop-gerrymanders/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">gutting</a>&#160;the Voting Rights Act as a legal weapon.</p>
<p>In a new interview, Assistant&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155854" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155854">&#8220;‘Lines are going to change’: Trump DOJ confirms it will target minority voters nationwide after Supreme Court ruling&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Trump flouts lower court rulings in unprecedented display of executive power&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155852</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 19:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[authoritarian threats in US]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155852</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://apnews.com/article/trump-courts-contempt-defiance-7b94b24901d42961afe323d02e352733">AP:</a></p>
<p>In the second Trump administration’s first 15 months in office, district court judges ruled it was violating an order in at least 31 lawsuits over a wide range of issues, including mass layoffs, deportations, spending cuts and immigration practices,&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155852" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155852">&#8220;Trump flouts lower court rulings in unprecedented display of executive power&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Alabama seeks to draw new congressional map ahead of midterms&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155850</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 19:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155850</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/01/alabama-congressional-map-redistricting-midterms-00902991">Politico:</a></p>
<p>Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey took her state a step closer to redrawing its congressional lines on Friday, following the Supreme Court’s decision earlier this week to limit enforcement of the Voting Rights Act.</p>
<p>Ivey called a special legislative session&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155850" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155850">&#8220;Alabama seeks to draw new congressional map ahead of midterms&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Who Will Stand Up to the Supreme Court Justices?&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155848</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 19:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155848</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Nikolas Bowie &#38; Daphna Renan NYT <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/02/opinion/supreme-court-voting-rights-act.html">oped</a>:</p>
<p>With its&#160;<a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-109_21o3.pdf" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">decision</a>&#160;this week in Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court gutted a core part of the Voting Rights Act, Congress’s landmark prohibition on voting rules that have the effect of&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155848" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155848">&#8220;Who Will Stand Up to the Supreme Court Justices?&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
