<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Election Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://electionlawblog.org/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://electionlawblog.org/</link>
	<description>The law of politics and the politics of law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 22:34:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>&#8220;Trump takes aim at US election system, which experts call ‘fundamentally secure’&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157431</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Tokaji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 22:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent fraud squad]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://san.com/cc/trump-takes-aim-at-us-election-system-which-experts-call-fundamentally-secure/">Straight Arrow News</a>, in anticipation of tonight&#8217;s address: </p>
<p>President Donald Trump will deliver a prime-time address Thursday night on election security, promising “really big news” as his administration reportedly prepares to release newly declassified intelligence related to the 2020&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157431" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157431">&#8220;Trump takes aim at US election system, which experts call ‘fundamentally secure’&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Georgia’s Senators Ridicule Trump’s Election Fraud Claims&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157429</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Tokaji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 21:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent fraud squad]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157429</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/16/us/politics/georgia-senators-ossoff-warnock-trump-election-fraud.html">NYT</a> on Senators Warnock&#8217;s and Ossoff&#8217;s efforts to get out ahead of the President&#8217;s <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157389">primetime speech</a> this evening:  &#8220;The two senators and their Democratic allies have ridiculed the president’s fixation on his loss in 2020 and the accompanying Democratic victories&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157429" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157429">&#8220;Georgia’s Senators Ridicule Trump’s Election Fraud Claims&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;White House teleprompter operator made more than $100K betting on Trump&#8217;s speeches: Sources&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157427</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Tokaji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 21:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[chicanery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict of interest laws]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://abcnews.com/US/white-house-teleprompter-operator-made-100k-betting-trumps/story?id=134764573">ABC News</a>:</p>
<p>President Donald Trump&#8217;s longtime teleprompter operator is believed to have made tens of thousands of dollars by placing bets on more than a dozen of Trump&#8217;s speeches on the&#160;<a href="https://abcnews.com/US/prediction-market-kalshi-suspends-3-congressional-candidates-betting/story?id=132284917">prediction market Kalshi</a>, federal investigators with the&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157427" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157427">&#8220;White House teleprompter operator made more than $100K betting on Trump&#8217;s speeches: Sources&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Institute for Responsive Government on Likely Impact of SAVE America Act</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157425</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Tokaji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[voter id]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>IRG offers <a href="https://responsivegov.org/research/voter-id-changes-required-under-the-save-america/">this analysis</a> of the state-by-state impact the bill could have on voter ID, if it were to become law:</p>
<p>Currently, not a single state meets the restrictive ID criteria in the bill, though Ohio comes close. Meeting these&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157425" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157425">Institute for Responsive Government on Likely Impact of SAVE America Act</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Race and Registration Roadblocks&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157422</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Tokaji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[voter registration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Rebekah Herrick, Joshua M. Jansa, Matthew P. Motta and Abida Sultana <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/15331296261465307#tab-contributors">in Election Law Journal</a>. Here&#8217;s the abstract: </p>
<p>We consider equity in pathways to democratic participation in the United States by examining the effects of voter registration laws on&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157422" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157422">&#8220;Race and Registration Roadblocks&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Supreme Court cert denials of interest</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157419</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157419</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>While it&#8217;s news from last month, I didn&#8217;t want to pass over a couple of notable cert denials from the Court.</p>
<p>The first was <a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/la-union-del-pueblo-entero-v-paxton/" id="https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/la-union-del-pueblo-entero-v-paxton/">La Union del Pueblo Entero v. Paxton</a>. The Fifth Circuit reversed the district court and&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157419" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157419">Two Supreme Court cert denials of interest</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Election denial activists briefed at White House ahead of Trump’s primetime speech&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157418</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Tokaji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent fraud squad]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157418</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.ms.now/news/election-denial-activists-briefed-at-white-house-ahead-of-trumps-prime-time-speech">MS Now</a>:  </p>
<p>The White House hosted about two dozen Trump-aligned activists this week ahead of President Donald Trump’s primetime address on the 2020 election. The session was convened by conservative lawyer Cleta Mitchell and attended by figures who have&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157418" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157418">&#8220;Election denial activists briefed at White House ahead of Trump’s primetime speech&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Survivor&#8221;-style voting</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157385</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ned Foley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 16:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157385</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Two days ago, <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157349">Dan linked </a>to <a href="https://democracysos.substack.com/p/game-of-survivor-in-maine-democrats">Steven Hill&#8217;s Substack piece</a> lamenting that the procedure that Maine Democrats have adopted for choosing a Senate nominee after Graham Platner&#8217;s withdrawal is similar to the method of eliminating contestants in the TV show&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157385" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157385">&#8220;Survivor&#8221;-style voting</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump Spokesperson Flubs the Name of the National Voter Registration Act in White House Statement</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157413</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157413</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/16/inside-trumps-remaking-american-elections-00999693">Politico</a>: </p>
<p>White House spokesperson&#160;Abigail Jackson&#160;said in a statement that&#160;Trump&#160;is “committed to ensuring that Americans have full confidence in the administration of elections,” noting that this includes ensuring that non-citizens cannot vote and that voter rolls are up to date.&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157413" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157413">Trump Spokesperson Flubs the Name of the National Voter Registration Act in White House Statement</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to Expect, When You are Expecting the President to Lie (Again, About Elections)</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157403</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent fraud squad]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157403</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Like others in this space, I will be listening to the President&#8217;s speech tonight, which is reportedly going to make claims about foreign (perhaps <a href="https://x.com/JenniferJJacobs/status/2077521637763641824?s=20&#38;mc_cid=9eaa14ed7a&#38;mc_eid=5737cbb051">Chinese</a>) election interference in 2020 and <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/16/republicans-brace-trump-speech-election-fraud-00999640">supposedly argue</a> that passage of the SAVE America Act&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157403" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157403">What to Expect, When You are Expecting the President to Lie (Again, About Elections)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Highlights from Day 1 of Blanche Confirmation Hearing</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157404</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Tokaji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>WaPo offers <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/07/16/5-new-things-we-learned-blanches-ag-confirmation-hearing/">this summary</a> of key moments from yesterday&#8217;s proceedings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is considering Todd Blanche&#8217;s nomination to serve as U.S. Attorney General.  Election-related highlights:  </p>
<p>&#8220;Blanche repeatedly sidestepped questions about whether he supports Trump’s <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2025/01/20/trump-pardons-jan-6-defendants/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">decision to </a>&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157404" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157404">Highlights from Day 1 of Blanche Confirmation Hearing</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;‘Death by a thousand cuts’: Inside Trump’s remaking of American elections&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157395</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Tokaji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[authoritarian threats in US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent fraud squad]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157395</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/16/inside-trumps-remaking-american-elections-00999693">Politico</a>: </p>
<p>President Donald Trump seemingly has a plan for the nation’s election apparatus: Dismantle the existing system with a series of cuts, firings and threats, rather than a sledgehammer blow&#8230;.</p>
<p>And now,&#160;Trump&#160;is set to deliver a speech Thursday evening&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157395" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157395">&#8220;‘Death by a thousand cuts’: Inside Trump’s remaking of American elections&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CDT FAQ:  &#8220;Voting System Vulnerabilities and How They Can Be Weaponized&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157391</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Tokaji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent fraud squad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157391</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://cdt.org/insights/faq-voting-system-vulnerabilities-and-how-they-can-be-weaponized/">Geoff Hale of the Center for Democracy and Technology</a>, helping us distinguish what&#8217;s real from what&#8217;s not in preparation for <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157389">tonight&#8217;s presidential address</a>:  </p>
<p>Vulnerabilities in voting systems are real and worth fixing. At the same time, the manner&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157391" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157391">CDT FAQ:  &#8220;Voting System Vulnerabilities and How They Can Be Weaponized&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;‘Scared s–tless’: Republicans brace for Trump’s primetime speech&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157389</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Tokaji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent fraud squad]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157389</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/16/republicans-brace-trump-speech-election-fraud-00999640">Politico</a> on GOP reaction to Trump&#8217;s planned address on elections this evening: </p>
<p>President&#160;Donald Trump&#160;is promising to reveal “really big news” on election security. Many Republicans wish he wouldn’t.</p>
<p>The president’s speech, expected to be delivered in prime time Thursday from&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157389" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157389">&#8220;‘Scared s–tless’: Republicans brace for Trump’s primetime speech&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Mystery Money Powering Trump&#8217;s Second Term&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157387</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Tokaji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[bribery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict of interest laws]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-fundraising-groups-financial-disclosures-8d5f5c35?mod=hp_lead_pos7">WSJ</a> on the almost $782 million that Trump-linked groups have received since the 2024 election:</p>
<p>Presidents have always raised money from private donors—to run for office, throw inaugural balls and build presidential libraries.&#160;</p>
<p>But&#160;<a href="https://www.wsj.com/topics/person/donald-trump" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Donald Trump</a>&#160;has turned his second&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157387" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157387">&#8220;The Mystery Money Powering Trump&#8217;s Second Term&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Ranked Choice Voting, Campaign Spending, and Independent Expenditures: An Exploratory Comparative Analysis&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157382</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Tokaji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[alternative voting systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157382</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6963439">Kevin Clelland and Jeanne Clelland on SSRN</a>.  From the abstract:</p>
<p>This study examines the relationship between campaign expenditures and electoral performance in single-winner instant runoff voting (IRV) elections compared to plurality elections. Using data from competitive primary elections in&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157382" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157382">&#8220;Ranked Choice Voting, Campaign Spending, and Independent Expenditures: An Exploratory Comparative Analysis&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Jay Clayton Faces Tough Questions in Hearing Over 2020 Election&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157380</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Tokaji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 21:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157380</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/15/us/politics/jay-clayton-confirmation-hearing-director-national-intelligence.html?smid=url-share">NYT</a>: </p>
<p>Democrats on Wednesday repeatedly questioned Jay Clayton, President Trump’s nominee to lead the nation’s intelligence community, about his refusal to answer the question of who won the 2020 election.</p>
<p>Mr. Clayton’s response — that Joseph R. Biden Jr.&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157380" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157380">&#8220;Jay Clayton Faces Tough Questions in Hearing Over 2020 Election&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Blanche Faces Crucial Hurdle After Rocky Hearing&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157375</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Tokaji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 21:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157375</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/15/us/politics/todd-blanche-attorney-general-confirmation.html">NYT</a>: </p>
<p>The fate of Todd Blanche’s nomination as attorney general remained uncertain on Wednesday after a rocky confirmation hearing in which a Republican senator raised serious questions about his role in creating a $1.8 billion fund for purported victims&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157375" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157375">&#8220;Blanche Faces Crucial Hurdle After Rocky Hearing&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;FBI Has Looked at Using Questionable AI Tech to Review Signatures on Seized Mail-In Ballots&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157373</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Tokaji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 21:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[absentee ballots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent fraud squad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting technology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157373</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-2020-election-georgia-fulton-artificial-intelligence-fbi">Pro Publica</a>: </p>
<p>The FBI has explored using artificial intelligence to assess the validity of signatures on tens of thousands of mail-in ballot envelopes seized from Fulton County, Georgia, the latest push in the Trump administration’s unprecedented reinvestigation of the&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157373" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157373">&#8220;FBI Has Looked at Using Questionable AI Tech to Review Signatures on Seized Mail-In Ballots&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Trump in His Thursday Speech on &#8220;Free and Fair Elections&#8221; Going to Try to Order the (Commissioner-Less) EAC to Decertify Dominion Voting Machines used in 11 States?</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157371</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election Assistance Commission]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157371</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://michaelmcdonald.substack.com/p/what-trump-may-say-during-his-thursday?r=jy0hz&#38;utm_medium=ios&#38;triedRedirect=true">Plausible theory</a> from Michael McDonald.</p>
<p>As with many things that Trump is trying to do with elections, I expect such actions to be challenged in court and for challengers being likely to prevail.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157371">Is Trump in His Thursday Speech on &#8220;Free and Fair Elections&#8221; Going to Try to Order the (Commissioner-Less) EAC to Decertify Dominion Voting Machines used in 11 States?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
