<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Election Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://electionlawblog.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://electionlawblog.org/</link>
	<description>The law of politics and the politics of law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:39:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Fourth Circuit Panel, on 2-1 Party Line Vote, Holds That Political Parties and Joint Fundraising Committees are Not Entitled under FCC Rules to Get the Cheapest TV Ad Rates that Must Be Offered to Candidates; Next Stop SCOTUS</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/fourth-circuit-panel-on-2-1-party-line-vote-holds-that-political-parties-and-joint-fundraising-committees-are-not-entitled-under-fcc-rules-to-get-the-cheapest-tv-ad-rates-that-must-be-offered-to-can/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political parties]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158221</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/261785.P.pdf">The majority and dissent </a>disagree both over whether the court properly has jurisdiction over this matter and whether on the merits these cheap ad rates must be made available to parties or JFCs coordinating with candidates.</p>
<p>This case went up&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/fourth-circuit-panel-on-2-1-party-line-vote-holds-that-political-parties-and-joint-fundraising-committees-are-not-entitled-under-fcc-rules-to-get-the-cheapest-tv-ad-rates-that-must-be-offered-to-can/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/fourth-circuit-panel-on-2-1-party-line-vote-holds-that-political-parties-and-joint-fundraising-committees-are-not-entitled-under-fcc-rules-to-get-the-cheapest-tv-ad-rates-that-must-be-offered-to-can/">Fourth Circuit Panel, on 2-1 Party Line Vote, Holds That Political Parties and Joint Fundraising Committees are Not Entitled under FCC Rules to Get the Cheapest TV Ad Rates that Must Be Offered to Candidates; Next Stop SCOTUS</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MUST READ: &#8220;Can the Midterms Be &#8216;Stolen&#8217; On Jan. 3? It&#8217;s Complicated.&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/must-read-can-the-midterms-be-stolen-on-jan-3-its-complicated/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ned Foley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/can-the-midterms-be-%27stolen%27-on-jan.-3--it%27s-complicated">Molly Roberts for Lawfare</a> has written the best&#8211;most comprehensive and nuanced&#8211;analysis that I&#8217;ve read so far on how to think about the risk that something could go awry on January 3, when the House endeavors to organize itself based on&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/must-read-can-the-midterms-be-stolen-on-jan-3-its-complicated/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/must-read-can-the-midterms-be-stolen-on-jan-3-its-complicated/">MUST READ: &#8220;Can the Midterms Be &#8216;Stolen&#8217; On Jan. 3? It&#8217;s Complicated.&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona: &#8220;&#8216;With 1,000% certainty&#8217;: Voters say candidates faked their donations to get public campaign cash&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/arizona-with-1000-certainty-voters-say-candidates-faked-their-donations-to-get-public-campaign-cash/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 22:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[chicanery]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://azmirror.com/2026/08/25/with-1000-certainty-voters-say-candidates-faked-their-donations-to-get-public-campaign-cash/">Arizona Mirror:</a></p>
<p>At least six Arizona residents say three statewide candidates falsely used their names to qualify for more than $4.7 million in public campaign funding.</p>
<p>“I can tell you right now, with 1,000% certainty, that I did not make&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/arizona-with-1000-certainty-voters-say-candidates-faked-their-donations-to-get-public-campaign-cash/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/arizona-with-1000-certainty-voters-say-candidates-faked-their-donations-to-get-public-campaign-cash/">Arizona: &#8220;&#8216;With 1,000% certainty&#8217;: Voters say candidates faked their donations to get public campaign cash&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;How State Laws May Constrain Law Enforcement Seizures of Election Materials&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/how-state-laws-may-constrain-law-enforcement-seizures-of-election-materials/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 22:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158214</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Derek Clinger has written <a href="https://statedemocracy.law.wisc.edu/our-work/how-state-laws-may-constrain-law-enforcement-seizures-of-election-materials">this report</a> for the State Democracy Research Initiative.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/how-state-laws-may-constrain-law-enforcement-seizures-of-election-materials/">&#8220;How State Laws May Constrain Law Enforcement Seizures of Election Materials&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Trump is having trouble changing how Americans vote&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/trump-is-having-trouble-changing-how-americans-vote/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 21:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/08/25/trump-is-having-trouble-changing-how-americans-vote/">WaPo:</a></p>
<p>For much of his second term, President Donald Trump has been trying to dramatically change how people vote. He’s pushed to limit (or ban) mail voting, create strict voter ID laws, require verification of citizenship, and even once said&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/trump-is-having-trouble-changing-how-americans-vote/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/trump-is-having-trouble-changing-how-americans-vote/">&#8220;Trump is having trouble changing how Americans vote&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Court halts Ohio proof-of-citizenship requirement at motor vehicle offices</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/court-halts-ohio-proof-of-citizenship-requirement-at-motor-vehicle-offices/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 21:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158209</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/08/25/court-halts-ohio-proof-of-citizenship-requirement-motor-vehicle-offices/">WaPo:</a></p>
<p>&#160;federal judge temporarily blocked Ohio from requiring proof of citizenship when registering to vote at motor vehicle offices, a setback for conservative efforts to tighten voter registration rules ahead of the November midterms.</p>
<p>Ohio’s law requiring proof of citizenship&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/court-halts-ohio-proof-of-citizenship-requirement-at-motor-vehicle-offices/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/court-halts-ohio-proof-of-citizenship-requirement-at-motor-vehicle-offices/">&#8220;Court halts Ohio proof-of-citizenship requirement at motor vehicle offices</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin: &#8220;La Crosse County DA will not charge Elon Musk, saying he doesn’t think he could get a conviction&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/wisconsin-la-crosse-county-da-will-not-charge-elon-musk-saying-he-doesnt-think-he-could-get-a-conviction/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 20:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158206</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.wpr.org/news/la-crosse-county-da-elon-musk-election-bribery-social-media-supreme-court">WPR:</a></p>
<p>Billionaire Elon Musk will not face criminal charges related to a social media post he made offering $1 million to people who voted in the 2025 state Supreme Court race, the La Crosse County District Attorney’s Office&#160;<a href="https://www.wpr.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/General-Letter_1-Musk-Elon.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">announced Tuesday</a>&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/wisconsin-la-crosse-county-da-will-not-charge-elon-musk-saying-he-doesnt-think-he-could-get-a-conviction/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/wisconsin-la-crosse-county-da-will-not-charge-elon-musk-saying-he-doesnt-think-he-could-get-a-conviction/">Wisconsin: &#8220;La Crosse County DA will not charge Elon Musk, saying he doesn’t think he could get a conviction&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal District Court Finds that U.S. Government Violated Its Order When USPS Issued Its Final Rule on Mail Ballots; Judge Imposes No Remedy as New Injunctions are in the Pipeline</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/federal-district-court-finds-that-u-s-government-violated-its-order-when-usps-issued-its-final-rule-on-mail-ballots-judge-imposes-no-remedy-as-new-injunctions-are-in-the-pipeline/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 19:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158204</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mad.298449/gov.uscourts.mad.298449.201.0_1.pdf">Judge Talwani&#8217;s order</a> chides the Administration for issuing the final rule in violation of her order but concludes that &#8220;The relief requested by the Plaintiffs will not remedy the past violation and agrees with Defendants that Plaintiffs’ proposed further order&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/federal-district-court-finds-that-u-s-government-violated-its-order-when-usps-issued-its-final-rule-on-mail-ballots-judge-imposes-no-remedy-as-new-injunctions-are-in-the-pipeline/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/federal-district-court-finds-that-u-s-government-violated-its-order-when-usps-issued-its-final-rule-on-mail-ballots-judge-imposes-no-remedy-as-new-injunctions-are-in-the-pipeline/">Federal District Court Finds that U.S. Government Violated Its Order When USPS Issued Its Final Rule on Mail Ballots; Judge Imposes No Remedy as New Injunctions are in the Pipeline</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A quick prediction on the USPS / mail ballot nonsense</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/a-quick-prediction-on-the-usps-mail-ballot-nonsense/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Levitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 17:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[absentee ballots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Justin here.&#160; I don’t usually do predictions: I prefer analysis instead.&#160; But all of the headlines generated by the Supreme Court’s <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/26a124_hgci.pdf">decision yesterday</a> in the mail ballots case speak to the potential for chaos, and so I thought it might&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/a-quick-prediction-on-the-usps-mail-ballot-nonsense/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/a-quick-prediction-on-the-usps-mail-ballot-nonsense/">A quick prediction on the USPS / mail ballot nonsense</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;California justices seem skeptical of Sheriff Chad Bianco’s defense in ballot seizure case&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/california-justices-seem-skeptical-of-sheriff-chad-biancos-defense-in-ballot-seizure-case/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 16:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://calmatters.org/politics/2026/08/riverside-county-ballot-seizure-supreme-court/">Cal Matters:</a></p>
<p>California’s Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical on Monday that Riverside Sheriff Chad Bianco was acting within his legal rights when he seized&#160;<a href="https://calmatters.org/politics/2026/03/chad-bianco-ballots-seized-riverside/">more than 650,000 ballots</a>&#160;from that county’s top election administrator in March.</p>
<p>In back-to-back hearings in&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/california-justices-seem-skeptical-of-sheriff-chad-biancos-defense-in-ballot-seizure-case/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/california-justices-seem-skeptical-of-sheriff-chad-biancos-defense-in-ballot-seizure-case/">&#8220;California justices seem skeptical of Sheriff Chad Bianco’s defense in ballot seizure case&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Nothing changes yet with the Supreme Court’s order on elections. But it could open door to ‘chaos’&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/nothing-changes-yet-with-the-supreme-courts-order-on-elections-but-it-could-open-door-to-chaos/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://apnews.com/article/elections-mail-voting-supreme-court-midterms-3780d57190a317e63fd19583c8ebb143">AP:</a></p>
<p><a href="https://apnews.com/article/trump-mail-voting-supreme-court-157afc3c195ce0a62c522da5ce904b04">The Supreme Court’s decision</a>&#160;giving preliminary approval for President Donald Trump’s&#160;<a href="https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-mail-voting-elections-47cc334b1fb7742244a9c4f176b355cd">order restricting mail voting</a>&#160;may not lead to a single election procedure changing during the November midterms, but it has already thrown into uncertainty the method that nearly&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/nothing-changes-yet-with-the-supreme-courts-order-on-elections-but-it-could-open-door-to-chaos/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/nothing-changes-yet-with-the-supreme-courts-order-on-elections-but-it-could-open-door-to-chaos/">&#8220;Nothing changes yet with the Supreme Court’s order on elections. But it could open door to ‘chaos’&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Trump Quietly Asserts Control Over Postal Service Amid Plans to Overhaul Voting&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/trump-quietly-asserts-control-over-postal-service-amid-plans-to-overhaul-voting/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 15:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158195</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/24/us/politics/mail-voting-supreme-court-postal-service-trump.html">NYT:</a></p>
<p>Four weeks before President Trump signed an executive order seeking to restrict mail voting, he filed four nominations for vacancies on the Board of Governors of the U.S. Postal Service.</p>
<p>All four were Republicans. Three have expressed doubts about&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/trump-quietly-asserts-control-over-postal-service-amid-plans-to-overhaul-voting/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/trump-quietly-asserts-control-over-postal-service-amid-plans-to-overhaul-voting/">&#8220;Trump Quietly Asserts Control Over Postal Service Amid Plans to Overhaul Voting&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cameron Kistler: &#8220;Hog Barns and Ballot Boxes: The Disenfranchisement Tort the 8th Circuit Missed in Minnesota Voters Alliance&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/cameron-kistler-hog-barns-and-ballot-boxes-the-disenfranchisement-tort-the-8th-circuit-missed-in-minnesota-voters-alliance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 14:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[campaigns]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158193</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The following is a guest post by Cameron Kistler of Protect Democracy United:</p>
<p>The Eighth Circuit has held that a state may criminalize lies used to gain access to a hog barn, because the First Amendment does not protect falsehoods&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/cameron-kistler-hog-barns-and-ballot-boxes-the-disenfranchisement-tort-the-8th-circuit-missed-in-minnesota-voters-alliance/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/cameron-kistler-hog-barns-and-ballot-boxes-the-disenfranchisement-tort-the-8th-circuit-missed-in-minnesota-voters-alliance/">Cameron Kistler: &#8220;Hog Barns and Ballot Boxes: The Disenfranchisement Tort the 8th Circuit Missed in Minnesota Voters Alliance&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;My team fed chatbots election lies. Here’s what happened&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/my-team-fed-chatbots-election-lies-heres-what-happened/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 14:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[cheap speech]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Larry Norden WaPo <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/08/25/ai-chatbots-may-be-next-voter-guide-election-denialism-beware/">oped:</a></p>
<p>When we supplied chatbots — including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok — with election falsehoods often peddled on social media, they were mostly truth-tellers. Though the bots frequently mixed up facts, they resisted election misinformation in&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/my-team-fed-chatbots-election-lies-heres-what-happened/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/my-team-fed-chatbots-election-lies-heres-what-happened/">&#8220;My team fed chatbots election lies. Here’s what happened&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Supreme Court Reaffirms Its Embrace of Political Disclosure&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/the-supreme-court-reaffirms-its-embrace-of-political-disclosure/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 14:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158189</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/2026/08/21/the-supreme-court-reaffirms-its-embrace-of-political-disclosure/">Sandstrom and Freed:</a></p>
<p>Widely overlooked in the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark campaign finance decision this term is a surprising and robust affirmation of disclosure for combating corruption. With this principle reinforced, we expect many states to strengthen and expand their&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/the-supreme-court-reaffirms-its-embrace-of-political-disclosure/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/the-supreme-court-reaffirms-its-embrace-of-political-disclosure/">&#8220;The Supreme Court Reaffirms Its Embrace of Political Disclosure&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>My New One at Slate: &#8220;KBJ Warns of &#8216;Kafkaesque Nightmare&#8217; After Pro-Trump Supreme Court Ruling on Mail Voting. We’ll Know Soon Enough.&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/my-new-one-at-slate-kbj-warns-of-kafkaesque-nightmare-after-pro-trump-supreme-court-ruling-on-mail-voting-well-know-soon-enough/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 23:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I have written <a href="https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/08/trump-supreme-court-mail-voting-kbj-warning.html?gift_token=bB5ytKLITUa4A-y2F54woA">this piece </a>for Slate. It begins:</p>
<p>Last March, Donald Trump <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/04/03/2026-06601/ensuring-citizenship-verification-and-integrity-in-federal-elections">issued another one</a> of his executive orders trying to assert control over how the United States conducts its elections. On Monday, after a long delay, the Supreme&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/my-new-one-at-slate-kbj-warns-of-kafkaesque-nightmare-after-pro-trump-supreme-court-ruling-on-mail-voting-well-know-soon-enough/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/my-new-one-at-slate-kbj-warns-of-kafkaesque-nightmare-after-pro-trump-supreme-court-ruling-on-mail-voting-well-know-soon-enough/">My New One at Slate: &#8220;KBJ Warns of &#8216;Kafkaesque Nightmare&#8217; After Pro-Trump Supreme Court Ruling on Mail Voting. We’ll Know Soon Enough.&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>[Now Updated] Breaking: The Supreme Court, Over the Dissents of Democratic-Appointed Justices Stays the District Court Preliminary Injunction in Trump Mail-In Voting Case; But Another Injunction Against It Remains in Place for Now</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/breaking-the-supreme-court-over-the-dissents-of-democratic-appointed-justices-stays-the-district-court-preliminary-injunction-in-trump-mail-in-voting-case-but-another-injunction-against-it-remains/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 20:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158177</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>You can find the opinions <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/26a124_hgci.pdf">here.</a></p>
<p>The six Republican-appointed Justices over the dissents of the three Democratic-appointed Justices sided with the government in the Trump mail-in ballot case. But the Court&#8217;s ruling was  narrow and technical. The Court makes it&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/breaking-the-supreme-court-over-the-dissents-of-democratic-appointed-justices-stays-the-district-court-preliminary-injunction-in-trump-mail-in-voting-case-but-another-injunction-against-it-remains/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/breaking-the-supreme-court-over-the-dissents-of-democratic-appointed-justices-stays-the-district-court-preliminary-injunction-in-trump-mail-in-voting-case-but-another-injunction-against-it-remains/">[Now Updated] Breaking: The Supreme Court, Over the Dissents of Democratic-Appointed Justices Stays the District Court Preliminary Injunction in Trump Mail-In Voting Case; But Another Injunction Against It Remains in Place for Now</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s next for Trump v. California?</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/whats-next-for-trump-v-california/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 16:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[absentee ballots]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158175</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE: <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/26a124_hgci.pdf" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/26a124_hgci.pdf">Of course, hours after this post</a>, the Court issued a decision, without any reference to the pending final rule&#8211;so, apparently the work product was not lit on fire.</p>
<p>Back on August 7, I posited some reasons for the&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/whats-next-for-trump-v-california/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/whats-next-for-trump-v-california/">What&#8217;s next for Trump v. California?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rich Bernstein: &#8220;Congress Has Precluded Seizure of Ballots or Voting Machines During the Counting and Certification Process&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/rich-bernstein-congress-has-precluded-seizure-of-ballots-or-voting-machines-during-the-counting-and-certification-process/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 14:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The following is a guest post from Richard Bernstein:</p>
<p>As detailed in the <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/berstein-seizure.pdf">linked article, </a> Congress has precluded DOJ from obtaining a warrant to seize ballots, voting machines, or other original election materials until after state officials complete the counting&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/rich-bernstein-congress-has-precluded-seizure-of-ballots-or-voting-machines-during-the-counting-and-certification-process/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/rich-bernstein-congress-has-precluded-seizure-of-ballots-or-voting-machines-during-the-counting-and-certification-process/">Rich Bernstein: &#8220;Congress Has Precluded Seizure of Ballots or Voting Machines During the Counting and Certification Process&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Government Report That Made Me Stop Trusting Our Statistical Agencies&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/2026/the-government-report-that-made-me-stop-trusting-our-statistical-agencies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 14:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=158168</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://econjared.substack.com/p/the-government-report-that-made-me?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&#38;utm_medium=web">Jared Bernstein:</a></p>
<p>I’m often asked whether, in the age of Trump, we can trust government data. My answer has always been that we can because our statistical agencies have layers of insulation from such interference. To be clear, that doesn’t&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/the-government-report-that-made-me-stop-trusting-our-statistical-agencies/" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/2026/the-government-report-that-made-me-stop-trusting-our-statistical-agencies/">&#8220;The Government Report That Made Me Stop Trusting Our Statistical Agencies&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
