<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Election Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://electionlawblog.org/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://electionlawblog.org/</link>
	<description>The law of politics and the politics of law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 22:21:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>&#8220;South Dakota Democrat exits Senate race, clears way for independent&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157787</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 22:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ballot access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third parties]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157787</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/04/south-dakota-democrat-julian-beaudion-withdraws-01024746" id="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/04/south-dakota-democrat-julian-beaudion-withdraws-01024746">Politico</a>:</p>
<p>South Dakota Democratic Senate nominee Julian Beaudion dropped out of the race Tuesday, a move that comes following heightened pressure from within the party to clear the way for a stronger independent candidate, according <a href="https://vip.sdsos.gov/candidatelist.aspx?eid=774">to paperwork filed with </a>&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157787" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157787">&#8220;South Dakota Democrat exits Senate race, clears way for independent&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Wisconsin judge rules that paper absentee ballots violate rights of certain disabled people&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157785</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 22:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[absentee ballots]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://apnews.com/article/disabled-voters-wisconsin-electronic-election-c847246796ff0ae8382b2c2a332a59bf" id="https://apnews.com/article/disabled-voters-wisconsin-electronic-election-c847246796ff0ae8382b2c2a332a59bf">Scott Bauer at the Associated Press</a>:</p>
<p>Absentee voting in Wisconsin discriminates against disabled voters, a judge ruled Tuesday, siding with groups that are <a href="https://apnews.com/article/disabled-voters-wisconsin-electronic-election-1fac5af2fc4c08f354c1b3ba3ede8f46">seeking to force</a> election officials to allow for electronic casting of ballots.</p>
<p>But Dane County Circuit&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157785" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157785">&#8220;Wisconsin judge rules that paper absentee ballots violate rights of certain disabled people&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Missouri election chief rejects bid to hold public vote on Trump-backed congressional districts&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157783</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 22:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[redistricting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157783</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://apnews.com/article/redistricting-congress-missouri-trump-petition-vote-election-5cfa5294a987388f38e0960e3368d320" id="https://apnews.com/article/redistricting-congress-missouri-trump-petition-vote-election-5cfa5294a987388f38e0960e3368d320">AP</a>:</p>
<p>Missouri’s top election official has rejected a citizens’ petition seeking a statewide referendum on new congressional districts backed by President Donald Trump.</p>
<p>Supporters of the referendum had submitted hundreds of thousands of petition signatures in a bid to&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157783" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157783">&#8220;Missouri election chief rejects bid to hold public vote on Trump-backed congressional districts&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Judge rules Florida property tax ballot language misleading&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157771</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[voter initiatives]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/state/2026/08/04/florida-property-tax-ballot-language-ruled-misleading/91162417007/" id="https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/state/2026/08/04/florida-property-tax-ballot-language-ruled-misleading/91162417007/">Tallahassee Democrat</a>:</p>
<p>A Tallahassee judge said the title and summary for the November ballot initiative to reduce homeowners&#8217; property tax, originally proposed by Gov. Ron DeSantis, is &#8220;clearly and conclusively defective&#8221; and ordered it rewritten.</p>
<p>The proposed state constitutional&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157771" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157771">&#8220;Judge rules Florida property tax ballot language misleading&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Danny Ford II going back on GOP US Senate ballot after judge overrules disqualification by state party&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157769</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ballot access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primaries]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.postandcourier.com/politics/danny-ford-scgop-republican-us-senate/article_da778039-65f2-4d88-8ce2-705e09025c66.html" id="https://www.postandcourier.com/politics/danny-ford-scgop-republican-us-senate/article_da778039-65f2-4d88-8ce2-705e09025c66.html">Post &#38; Courier</a>:</p>
<p>A Richland County judge has ordered the S.C. Republican Party to put disqualified U.S. Senate candidate Danny Lee Ford II on the ballot to replace late Sen. Lindsey Graham after striking him from contention under a&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157769" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157769">&#8220;Danny Ford II going back on GOP US Senate ballot after judge overrules disqualification by state party&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;How Politicians Living and Dead Play the Stock Market With Campaign Cash&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157765</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.notus.org/money/stock-market-congress-campaigns-investments" id="https://www.notus.org/money/stock-market-congress-campaigns-investments">NOTUS</a>:</p>
<p>Former Speaker of the House Tom Foley <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1994/11/10/us/1994-elections-leaders-speaker-foley-defending-congress-last-concedes-election.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">lost</a> his final bid for reelection in 1994 after three decades in office.</p>
<p>In 2013, Foley <a href="https://apnews.com/united-states-congress-general-news-united-states-government-eb11011e59a44e11b901a53ecc6007e2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">died</a>.</p>
<p>But the “Committee to Reelect Tom Foley” — his still-technically active campaign committee&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157765" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157765">&#8220;How Politicians Living and Dead Play the Stock Market With Campaign Cash&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;AIPAC, One of the Biggest Spenders on U.S. Elections, Faces Its Biggest Test&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157767</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaigns]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157767</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/08/04/us/politics/aipac-israel-funds-spending.html" id="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/08/04/us/politics/aipac-israel-funds-spending.html">New York Times</a>:</p>
<p>In less than five years, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee has become one of the biggest spenders in American elections, flooding the airwaves in congressional races across the country.</p>
<p>Since its first involvement in elections,&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157767" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157767">&#8220;AIPAC, One of the Biggest Spenders on U.S. Elections, Faces Its Biggest Test&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;A Democracy Funder&#8217;s Confession: We May Be Making Things Worse&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157757</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 21:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election administration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157757</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Rachel Pritzker has this piece at the <a href="http://www.philanthropy.com/opinion/a-democracy-funders-confession-we-may-be-making-things-worse/" id="http://www.philanthropy.com/opinion/a-democracy-funders-confession-we-may-be-making-things-worse/">Council of Philanthropy</a>:</p>
<p>Over the past 10 years, American philanthropy has mobilized to defend the nation’s democracy. After the 2016 election, sensing that democracy was under threat, donors dramatically increased their support&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157757" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157757">&#8220;A Democracy Funder&#8217;s Confession: We May Be Making Things Worse&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;For Trump, the Year Is Always 2020&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157763</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 20:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[fraudulent fraud squad]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157763</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Katie Rogers at the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/03/us/politics/trump-2020-covid-fauci-election.html" id="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/03/us/politics/trump-2020-covid-fauci-election.html">New York Times</a>:</p>
<p>What year is it again?</p>
<p>Over the past few days, President Trump has been living in the year 2020, claiming that he defied his advisers to reopen the country during the coronavirus&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157763" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157763">&#8220;For Trump, the Year Is Always 2020&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>California files its brief in USPS absentee ballot dispute</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157759</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[absentee ballots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157759</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The deadline set by Justice Jackson was 4 pm ET today, and <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/26/26A124/417976/20260803142451298_Consolidated%20Opposition%20to%20Applications.pdf" id="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/26/26A124/417976/20260803142451298_Consolidated%20Opposition%20to%20Applications.pdf">California&#8217;s brief is in</a>. There are a number of amicus briefs you can review <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/26a124.html" id="https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/26a124.html">here</a>. A decision from the Court could come at any time.</p>
<p>There&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157759" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157759">California files its brief in USPS absentee ballot dispute</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Silicon Valley Donors Pour $194 Million into California Politics. Now Comes the Wealth Tax Fight&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157755</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 18:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plutocrats United]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.mercurynews.com/2026/07/30/silicon-valley-donors-california-politics-wealth-tax/">San Jose Mercury News:</a></p>
<p>A Bay Area News Group analysis of campaign finance data found that 34 Silicon Valley executives and investors, along with 14 of their spouses, poured $194 million into state elections over the past 1 1/2 years.&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157755" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157755">&#8220;Silicon Valley Donors Pour $194 Million into California Politics. Now Comes the Wealth Tax Fight&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Spoke to Leah Litman and Kate Shaw for &#8220;Strict Scrutiny&#8221; about the Supreme Court&#8217;s Review of the Trump Mail-Balloting Order</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157753</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 18:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>You can <a href="https://crooked.com/podcast/will-trump-succeed-in-rigging-the-midterms/">download </a>it as a podcast or <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWw5drRBfv0">watch here:</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157753">I Spoke to Leah Litman and Kate Shaw for &#8220;Strict Scrutiny&#8221; about the Supreme Court&#8217;s Review of the Trump Mail-Balloting Order</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;California could require voter ID. Both sides say voters are being misled&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157751</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[voter id]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter initiatives]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157751</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.mercurynews.com/2026/08/03/california-voter-id-prop-39-both-sides-sue/" id="https://www.mercurynews.com/2026/08/03/california-voter-id-prop-39-both-sides-sue/">Mercury News</a>:</p>
<p>A fight is heating up over a California ballot initiative to implement voter ID&#160;as it heads to the courts,&#160;pitting advocates who say it will ensure election integrity in the vote-by-mail era against critics who say it would&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157751" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157751">&#8220;California could require voter ID. Both sides say voters are being misled&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Election Certification Processes and Guardrails&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157749</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election administration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157749</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/election-certification-processes-and-guardrails" id="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/election-certification-processes-and-guardrails">Updated report</a> from the Brennan Center.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157749">&#8220;Election Certification Processes and Guardrails&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Kansas Supreme Court declines to take emergency appeal of election law&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157747</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 15:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[absentee ballots]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://kansasreflector.com/2026/07/31/kansas-supreme-court-declines-to-take-emergency-appeal-of-election-law/" id="https://kansasreflector.com/2026/07/31/kansas-supreme-court-declines-to-take-emergency-appeal-of-election-law/">Kansas Reflector</a>:</p>
<p>The Kansas Supreme Court chose not to authorize an expedited review of lower court decisions temporarily blocking enforcement of a new state law repealing the three-day grace period for mail-in advance ballots.</p>
<p>On Thursday, a majority of&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157747" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157747">&#8220;Kansas Supreme Court declines to take emergency appeal of election law&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Trump’s mail voting appeal tests Supreme Court&#8217;s anti-chaos election rule&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157745</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 12:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[absentee ballots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>John Fritze at <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/03/politics/trump-mail-voting-supreme-court-appeal" id="https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/03/politics/trump-mail-voting-supreme-court-appeal">CNN</a>:</p>
<p>President Donald Trump’s emergency appeal aimed at <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/27/politics/trump-supreme-court-mail-voting-executive-order">limiting the use of mail ballots</a> is poised to test a controversial, 20-year-old Supreme Court principle that was intended to avoid chaos before elections.</p>
<p>The “Purcell principle,” rooted&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157745" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157745">&#8220;Trump’s mail voting appeal tests Supreme Court&#8217;s anti-chaos election rule&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;NJ GOP sees momentum for voter ID law after governor&#8217;s comments in favor&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157743</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 12:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter id]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157743</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://newjerseymonitor.com/2026/08/03/nj-republicans-voter-id-governor-comments/" id="https://newjerseymonitor.com/2026/08/03/nj-republicans-voter-id-governor-comments/">New Jersey Monitor</a>. The devils is always in the details, and the competing Republican proposals in the story are an idea about where the dispute will go. (I assume the more lenient bill is the one that can attract&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157743" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157743">&#8220;NJ GOP sees momentum for voter ID law after governor&#8217;s comments in favor&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Struggle of Being a No-Corporate-PAC-Money Democrat&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157740</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 12:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaigns]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157740</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.notus.org/democrats/no-corporate-pac-money-democrat-struggle-elections-fundraising" id="https://www.notus.org/democrats/no-corporate-pac-money-democrat-struggle-elections-fundraising">NOTUS</a>:</p>
<p>An increasing number of Democratic candidates are pledging to reject donations from business-linked political action committees in 2026 — a promise House Democrats say is easier said than done.</p>
<p>“I am deciding whether I’m going to committee or&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157740" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157740">&#8220;The Struggle of Being a No-Corporate-PAC-Money Democrat&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Democrats’ Biggest Donors Have Gone on Strike&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157737</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaigns]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157737</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/democrat-fundraising-midterm-elections-57f3d73c">WSJ:</a></p>
<p>George Soros&#160;and his son Alex donated more than $400,000 to the Democratic National Committee during the 2018 midterms. They gave more than $1 million during the 2022 midterm election cycle, campaign finance records show.</p>
<p>This year, they have yet&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157737" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157737">&#8220;The Democrats’ Biggest Donors Have Gone on Strike&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Trump says he will ‘push hard’ for payout fund, keep Blanche as acting AG&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157735</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 16:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157735</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/08/01/trump-says-he-will-push-hard-payout-fund-keep-blanche-acting-ag/">WaPo:</a></p>
<p>President Donald Trump threatened on Saturday to revive his controversial plan for&#160;<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/07/31/why-blanches-assurance-that-payout-fund-is-dead-has-not-swayed-senators/">federal payouts</a>&#160;to people he says were “badly treated” by the Obama and Biden administrations, telling senators that he would “push hard” for legislation to fund the&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157735" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=157735">&#8220;Trump says he will ‘push hard’ for payout fund, keep Blanche as acting AG&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
