<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Election Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://electionlawblog.org/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://electionlawblog.org/</link>
	<description>The law of politics and the politics of law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 21:25:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Trump Administration says Callais&#8217;s Logic Applies to Title VII&#8217;s Disparate Impact Provisions</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156693</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis Crum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 21:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156693</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The collateral damage of Louisiana v. Callais is spreading to employment discrimination. Relying on Callais, the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) has issued a memo declaring unconstitutional the EEOC’s interpretive rules and guidance documents governing Title VII’s disparate-impact provisions. You&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156693" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156693">Trump Administration says Callais&#8217;s Logic Applies to Title VII&#8217;s Disparate Impact Provisions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;ActBlue C.E.O. Invokes Fifth Amendment Repeatedly in Testimony to Congress&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156690</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156690</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/10/us/politics/actblue-fifth-amendment-congress.html">NYT:</a></p>
<p>The chief executive of ActBlue, whose lawyers warned her that she might have misled Congress about how the Democratic fund-raising organization vetted its foreign donations, invoked her Fifth Amendment rights and declined to answer questions from a Republican-led House&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156690" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156690">&#8220;ActBlue C.E.O. Invokes Fifth Amendment Repeatedly in Testimony to Congress&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The AP&#8217;s Mark Sherman Retiring from the Supreme Court Beat at the End of June</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156676</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election law biz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156676</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court reporters are a special bunch: they must possess general legal and political knowledge and have the ability to assimilate dense Supreme Court opinions quickly and accurately. The caliber of the journalists covering the Court tis quite high, and&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156676" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156676">The AP&#8217;s Mark Sherman Retiring from the Supreme Court Beat at the End of June</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Postal Service won’t deliver mail ballots for states that don’t hand over voter lists, under plan for Trump directive&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156674</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156674</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/10/politics/postal-service-deliver-mail-in-ballots">CNN</a> with the latest on the Postal Service&#8217;s interference with mail-in voting:</p>
<p>State election officials could soon face a stark choice: Hand over voter lists to the Trump administration or risk losing Postal Service delivery for mail-in ballots.</p>
<p>That dilemma&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156674" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156674">&#8220;Postal Service won’t deliver mail ballots for states that don’t hand over voter lists, under plan for Trump directive&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;A Statutory Right to Vote&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156672</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156672</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Michael Mitchell, a Climenko Fellow at Harvard Law School, has published this <a href="https://journals.law.harvard.edu/jol/2026/06/07/a-statutory-right-to-vote/">article</a> on Congress&#8217;s power to codify the right to vote in the Harvard Journal on Legislation. Here&#8217;s the abstract:</p>
<p>The constitutional right to vote is in jeopardy. In&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156672" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156672">&#8220;A Statutory Right to Vote&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Homeland Security retreats on plan to get data on mail-in voters&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156670</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156670</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://michiganadvance.com/2026/06/09/repub/homeland-security-retreats-on-plan-to-get-data-on-mail-in-voters/">Michigan Advance</a> on DHS apparently retreating from its plans to gather data on mail-in voters:</p>
<p>The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is walking back, for now, a plan to sweep up data on millions of Americans who vote by mail&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156670" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156670">&#8220;Homeland Security retreats on plan to get data on mail-in voters&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;California&#8217;s slow vote count faces changes as Supreme Court decision on late ballots looms&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156668</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156668</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/californias-slow-vote-count-faces-changes-as-supreme-court-decision-on-late-ballots-looms/ar-AA25divt?ocid=BingNewsVerp">MSN</a> on how Watson may change vote counting in California:</p>
<p>California’s slow vote counting process — still underway and <a href="https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-06-07/president-trump-storms-off-meet-the-press" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">causing friction</a> after last week’s primary — may be forced to change before November’s midterm elections, as the <a href="https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2026-03-23/californians-may-need-to-mail-ballots-early-as-supreme-court-signals-support-for-new-election-day-deadline" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">U.S. Supreme Court </a>&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156668" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156668">&#8220;California&#8217;s slow vote count faces changes as Supreme Court decision on late ballots looms&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Equity and judicial orders close in time to an election</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156139</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 21:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156139</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Over the last several weeks, there have been Supreme Court election orders that ultimately affect the rules governing the 2026 election, including the Court&#8217;s most recent decision in Allen III, reversing the trial court&#8217;s decision and allowing Alabama&#8217;s new maps&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156139" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156139">Equity and judicial orders close in time to an election</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;‘All Sorts of Excesses, Like the Worst, Most Brazen Lying’&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156665</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 19:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156665</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/09/opinion/campaign-tactics-lies-misinformation.html">Thomas Edsall</a> in the NYT on deceptive campaign practices, past and present:</p>
<p>In the nearly 60 years since that 1967 election, the tools to manipulate outcomes have become technologically more sophisticated, more secretive and ever better at communicating false information&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156665" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156665">&#8220;‘All Sorts of Excesses, Like the Worst, Most Brazen Lying’&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;A Better Balance for Campaign Finance Disclosure&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156662</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 15:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156662</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>New Brennan Center <a href="https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/better-balance-campaign-finance-disclosure">report</a> on campaign finance disclosure:</p>
<p>Congress should enact commonsense solutions to ensure that the campaign finance system achieves the key benefits of disclosure without needless privacy risks that could discourage Americans’ political participation. Reforming the system should&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156662" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156662">&#8220;A Better Balance for Campaign Finance Disclosure&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Trump Previews Fall Strategy With Baseless Claims of California Vote Fraud&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156660</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 15:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156660</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/08/us/politics/trump-election-fraud-strategy-california.html">NYT</a> on Trump&#8217;s evergreen strategy of claiming fraud when he doesn&#8217;t like election results:</p>
<p>For President Trump, any Democratic election victory is suspicious on its face. Even, apparently, in one of the most liberal cities in America.</p>
<p>“Not possible for&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156660" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156660">&#8220;Trump Previews Fall Strategy With Baseless Claims of California Vote Fraud&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;FBI’s Fulton County 2020 investigation fails to deliver, so far&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156658</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 15:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156658</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.ajc.com/politics/2026/06/fbis-fulton-county-2020-investigation-fails-to-deliver-so-far/?gift_article_code=cl9kZlJtbGhpdmJtNXhtbG0tbHo3YzZ2OWJKZWxQWVB0bktZbUMtNDVHdzoxNzgzNjA1OTc4OjgzMTAxYTgwODA3YzM3OGQ&#38;utm_campaign=articlegifting">AJC</a> on the unsurprising news that the FBI has failed to find fraud in Fulton County in the 2020 election:</p>
<p>President Donald Trump said “<a href="https://www.ajc.com/politics/2026/02/trump-fulton-fbi-raid-will-show-2020-election-was-stolen/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">some interesting things</a>” would result from January’s Fulton County ballot seizure. FBI Director Kash&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156658" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156658">&#8220;FBI’s Fulton County 2020 investigation fails to deliver, so far&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Exclusive: Democrats Set in Motion Plan to Redraw Congressional Maps in as Many as 13 States&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156656</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 14:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156656</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://time.com/article/2026/06/08/exclusive-democrats-set-in-motion-plan-to-redraw-house-districts-in-as-many-as-13-states/?link_id=9&#38;can_id=a8f3a3af8b68602be523156ebb4acd93&#38;source=email-target-race-tally-dlcc-surpasses-100-target-races-in-key-battleground-states-at-historic-pace-2&#38;email_referrer=email_3273248&#38;email_subject=on-the-airwaves-dlccs-national-strategy-to-counter-gop-gerrymandering&#38;&#38;">Time </a>on the Democrats&#8217; ambitious plan to redraw congressional districts before the 2028 election.</p>
<p>Democrats are setting the stage to pursue <a href="https://time.com/article/2026/05/05/republicans-redistricting-supreme-court-voting-rights-act-louisiana-alabama-tennessee/">redistricting</a> efforts in as many as 13 states before 2028, redrawing congressional lines to secure potentially dozens of additional&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156656" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156656">&#8220;Exclusive: Democrats Set in Motion Plan to Redraw Congressional Maps in as Many as 13 States&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Delaware Entity Voting Should Sound Alarm Over Corporate Power&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156652</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 13:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156652</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Haan in <a href="https://news.bloomberglaw.com/legal-exchange-insights-and-commentary/delaware-entity-voting-should-sound-alarm-over-corporate-power">Bloomberg</a>:</p>
<p>Now,&#160;<a href="https://news.bloomberglaw.com/esg/science-fiction-come-to-life-delaware-judge-lets-companies-vote">entity voting</a>&#160;has survived its first legal test.&#160;<a href="https://aboutblaw.com/blQg">ACLU of Del. v. Town of Fenwick Island</a>&#160;sustained Delaware’s principle of “one person, one entity, one vote.” The new precedent has potential relevance to states&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156652" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156652">&#8220;Delaware Entity Voting Should Sound Alarm Over Corporate Power&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Justice Department Hasn’t Taken Its Usual Steps to Protect the 2026 Election&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156650</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 13:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.notus.org/2026-election/public-integrity-unit-doj-election-safeguards">NOTUS</a> on the DOJ&#8217;s activities (or lack thereof) before the 2026 election:</p>
<p>[F]ive months out from the midterm elections that will determine control of Congress, his Justice Department has canceled election-integrity training sessions for prosecutors and FBI agents, deleted a&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156650" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156650">&#8220;The Justice Department Hasn’t Taken Its Usual Steps to Protect the 2026 Election&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>My New One at MS NOW: &#8220;Trump’s latest ‘voter fraud’ claims may backfire on him in the fall&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156647</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[chicanery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraudulent fraud squad]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156647</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I have written<a href="https://www.ms.now/opinion/california-election-trump-fraud-la-mayor-pratt"> this piece </a>for MS NOW. It begins:</p>
<p>During normal times, the president of the United States would not routinely claim, without evidence, an epidemic of “voter fraud.” But Donald Trump is <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156626">on another tirade</a> about supposed fraud&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156647" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156647">My New One at MS NOW: &#8220;Trump’s latest ‘voter fraud’ claims may backfire on him in the fall&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Response to Michael Latner on PR and the Political Fragmentation of European Democracies</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156645</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Pildes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 21:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156645</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Now that I have a moment, I want to respond to Michael Latner’s <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156552">post</a> last week in favor of fragmenting the US House into a five, or six, or more party system.  I’ll make just a few brief points because&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156645" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156645">A Response to Michael Latner on PR and the Political Fragmentation of European Democracies</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SSRN: Not Quite Dead</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156640</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 18:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156640</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Following up on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156577">this post,</a> here&#8217;s a new post from SSRN, <a href="https://blog.ssrn.com/2026/06/04/ssrns-ongoing-commitment-to-legal-scholarship/">clarifying</a> what will and won&#8217;t be changing. </p>
<p>It remains to be seen if the <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/topten/topTenResults.cfm?groupingId=4860224&#38;netorjrnl=jrnl">recent Election Law scholarship</a> page will ever get updated.</p>
<p>Stay tuned.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156640">SSRN: Not Quite Dead</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Trump administration’s multiple investigations of the 2020 election may have more to do with 2026&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156637</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 14:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156637</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.votebeat.org/national/2026/06/08/fbi-investigation-2020-election-trump-milwaukee-fulton-maricopa/">VoteBeat</a>:</p>
<p>While investigators seem mainly focused on the 2020 vote, some elections experts believe the Trump administration’s wide-ranging probe is actually designed to create more doubts among Americans about future elections, as Republicans face strong political headwinds that could&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156637" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156637">&#8220;The Trump administration’s multiple investigations of the 2020 election may have more to do with 2026&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;American Democracy Wasn&#8217;t Designed for This&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156634</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 13:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156634</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey Rosen in the <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/06/founding-fathers-ai-constitution/687441/">Atlantic</a> on democracy  in our modern information environment:</p>
<p>Today, those advantages have disappeared, thanks to a technological revolution the Founders could never have imagined. The internet has turned everyone into a potential publisher, able to instantly&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156634" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156634">&#8220;American Democracy Wasn&#8217;t Designed for This&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
