<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Election Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://electionlawblog.org/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://electionlawblog.org/</link>
	<description>The law of politics and the politics of law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 22:33:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>After 7 Years of Work, “Restatement of the Law Third, Torts: Remedies Is Approved”</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156244</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 22:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Remedies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156244</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Very happy to be at this <a href="https://www.ali.org/news/articles/restatement-law-third-torts-remedies-approved">stage</a> of the process:</p>
<p>At its 2026 Annual Meeting, members of The American Law Institute approved Restatement of the Law Third, Torts: Remedies, marking the completion of the drafting phase of a major component&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156244" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156244">After 7 Years of Work, “Restatement of the Law Third, Torts: Remedies Is Approved”</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two thoughts on today&#8217;s Section 2 remands from SCOTUS</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156237</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Muller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 18:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156237</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156223" id="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156223">Rick H. blogged</a> about the remands in a pair of Section 2 cases. I find myself inclined toward the view that remand was appropriate, for two reasons.</p>
<p>First, both cases had district courts that found an underlying Section 2 violation.&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156237" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156237">Two thoughts on today&#8217;s Section 2 remands from SCOTUS</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donald Trump Colludes with Government that He Sued to Set Up $1.7 Billion Trust Fund to Reward Insurrectionists and Other Political Cronies</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156233</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 16:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[authoritarian threats in US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/18/us/trump-irs-lawsuit.html?smid=url-share">The Orwellian named Anti-Weaponization fund </a>in fact rewards those who tried to overthrow the legitimate government of the United States on January 6, 2021 and creates incentives and gives resources should they wish to try again.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156233">Donald Trump Colludes with Government that He Sued to Set Up $1.7 Billion Trust Fund to Reward Insurrectionists and Other Political Cronies</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>“G.O.P. to Begin Debating Voting Maps in This State. Not Everyone Approves.“</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156231</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 15:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/18/us/south-carolina-redistricting-republicans-clyburn.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share">NYT</a>:</p>
<p>This week, South Carolina’s legislature will begin debating whether to redraw congressional districts to help Republicans win all seven of the state’s House seats and displace its only Democratic House member.</p>
<p>For Republican lawmakers, the answer isn’t an&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156231" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156231">“G.O.P. to Begin Debating Voting Maps in This State. Not Everyone Approves.“</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Structural modeling of campaign finance decisions in the U.S. House of Representatives”</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156229</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 15:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a>Yidan Sun</a> and <a>Mayank Kejriwal</a> have written this article for <a href="https://journals.plos.org/complexsystems/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcsy.0000104">PLOS Complex Systems</a>. Here is the abstract:</p>
<p>Computational modeling and quantifying the drivers of modern political campaign finance is an emerging area of interest among researchers, policymakers, and the&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156229" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156229">“Structural modeling of campaign finance decisions in the U.S. House of Representatives”</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>“The Freedom to Give: Philanthropy, Civil Society, and the Limits of State Power”</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156227</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 15:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[tax law and election law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156227</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Cato event <a href="https://www.cato.org/events/freedom-give-philanthropy-civil-society-limits-state-power">video</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156227">“The Freedom to Give: Philanthropy, Civil Society, and the Limits of State Power”</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Why the Supreme Court&#8217;s voting rights ruling could play a big role at the local level”</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156225</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 15:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156225</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Hansi Lo Wang for <a href="https://www.npr.org/2026/05/18/nx-s1-5812837/supreme-court-voting-rights-act-state-local-redistricting">NPR</a>:</p>
<p>While Republican-led Southern states race to redo their congressional maps after the U.S. Supreme Court<a href="https://www.npr.org/2026/04/29/nx-s1-5754657/supreme-court-louisiana-redistricting" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">&#160;weakened the Voting Rights Act&#8217;s</a>&#160;protections against racial discrimination, the decision&#8217;s effects may be felt most notably on the&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156225" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156225">“Why the Supreme Court&#8217;s voting rights ruling could play a big role at the local level”</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Sends Back to 8th Circuit the Question Whether Private Parties Have the Right to Sue to Enforce Section 2 of Voting Rights Act in Light of Callais Case</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156223</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 14:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156223</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Justice Jackson dissented from <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051826zor_h315.pdf">the order,</a> on the sensible grounds that Callais did not consider the right to sue question. Of course the stakes are much lower now that Section 2 is essentially dead no matter who sues.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156223">Supreme Court Sends Back to 8th Circuit the Question Whether Private Parties Have the Right to Sue to Enforce Section 2 of Voting Rights Act in Light of Callais Case</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ELB Book Corner: Albert and La Raja: &#8220;Small Donors Aren’t Who You Think They Are&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156115</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ELB Book Corner]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156115</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I am pleased to welcome <a href="https://scholarworks.brandeis.edu/esploro/profile/zachary_albert/overview">Zachary Albert </a>and <a href="https://www.umass.edu/political-science/about/directory/ray-la-raja">Ray La Raja</a> to ELB Book Corner. They are the authors of the new book, <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo267055830.html">Small Donors in US Politics: Myth and Reality</a>. (ELB readers can get a 30 percent discount&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156115" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156115">ELB Book Corner: Albert and La Raja: &#8220;Small Donors Aren’t Who You Think They Are&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>“With Timing of Voting Rights Decision, Supreme Court Chose a Political Scramble”</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156221</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 11:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156221</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Abbie <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/18/us/politics/supreme-court-voting-rights-act-timing.html">VanSickle</a> for the NYT:</p>
<p>If the Supreme Court had announced its decision to narrow the Voting Rights Act a few weeks earlier, states could have prepared, rolling out new maps before candidates were registered and votes were cast.</p>
<p>If&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156221" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156221">“With Timing of Voting Rights Decision, Supreme Court Chose a Political Scramble”</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>“7 Republicans Voted to Convict Trump. Most Are No Longer in Office.”</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156219</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 23:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[election subversion risk]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/16/us/politics/republicans-trump-cassidy-conviction-impeachment.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share">NYT:</a></p>
<p>Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, one of seven Senate Republicans who voted to convict Donald J. Trump&#160;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/14/us/politics/republican-senators-impeachment-trump.html">of inciting an insurrection</a>&#160;in 2021, will depart Congress next year, after losing a Republican primary in which Mr. Trump lined up&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156219" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156219">“7 Republicans Voted to Convict Trump. Most Are No Longer in Office.”</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Trump Tightens Grasp on G.O.P. as Cassidy Loss Shows Cost of Defiance”</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156217</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 23:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156217</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/17/us/politics/trump-cassidy-midterms-louisiana-primary.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share">NYT</a>:</p>
<p>President Trump’s&#160;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/02/us/politics/trump-republican-primaries-candidates.html">push</a>&#160;to oust Republican lawmakers who have crossed him claimed its most prominent name yet in&#160;Louisiana this weekend, reinforcing Mr. Trump’s dominance in the party, even as the G.O.P. braces for a potential backlash to his&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156217" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156217">“Trump Tightens Grasp on G.O.P. as Cassidy Loss Shows Cost of Defiance”</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>“A Noncitizen Says She Was Told She Could Vote. Then Customs Detained Her at the Airport and Threatened to Deport Her.”</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156215</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 23:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156215</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Jen Fifield for <a href="https://www.propublica.org/article/noncitizen-voter-detained-airport-customs?utm_campaign=propublica-sprout&#38;utm_content=1779042603&#38;utm_medium=social&#38;utm_source=bluesky">ProPublica</a>:</p>
<p>Estelle, who’s long held permanent resident status in the U.S., is a veteran at navigating the reentry process when she returns from visiting relatives in her native France.</p>
<p>But on her most recent trip through&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156215" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156215">“A Noncitizen Says She Was Told She Could Vote. Then Customs Detained Her at the Airport and Threatened to Deport Her.”</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>“‘The entire South is on fire’: Black Southern Democrats warn that minority-majority legislative districts are at risk”</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156213</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 23:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/16/black-democrats-local-redistricting-war-00921648?nname=playbook&#38;nid=0000014f-1646-d88f-a1cf-5f46b7bd0000&#38;nrid=0000014e-f109-dd93-ad7f-f90d0def0000">Politico</a>:</p>
<p>As Republicans across the South race to redraw congressional lines ahead of the midterms, Black Democrats warn that another sweeping challenge to Black political power is on the horizon: the erosion of representation at the local level.</p>
<p>Last&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156213" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156213">“‘The entire South is on fire’: Black Southern Democrats warn that minority-majority legislative districts are at risk”</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Effects of Race-Blind Redistricting</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156204</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Stephanopoulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 15:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156204</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Nate Cohn and Eve Washington wrote this New York Times <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/17/upshot/redistricting-race-court-gerrymanders-elections.html">piece</a> arguing that race-blind (and party-blind) redistricting in the South would produce about as many minority-opportunity districts as existed before Callais. However, the ALARM district map ensembles on which Cohn&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156204" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156204">The Effects of Race-Blind Redistricting</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shifting to Proportional Representation is Not Necessary to Ensure Black Representation in the South</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156198</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Pildes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 13:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156198</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Both before and after Callais, a number of commentators have suggested Congress should enact some form of proportional representation to ensure continued black representation in the South.  This important new NYT <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/17/upshot/redistricting-race-court-gerrymanders-elections.html">piece</a> by Nate Cohn demonstrates that such a radical&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156198" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156198">Shifting to Proportional Representation is Not Necessary to Ensure Black Representation in the South</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;ActBlue C.E.O. Agrees to Testify Before Congress About Foreign Donor Vetting&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156196</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 19:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicanery]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156196</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/16/us/politics/actblue-testify-congress-donors.html">NYT:</a></p>
<p>The chief executive of the liberal fund-raising platform ActBlue has agreed to House Republicans’ request for her testimony next month to answer questions about how the group vets overseas donors, according to Walt Smoloski, a spokesman for the House&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156196" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156196">&#8220;ActBlue C.E.O. Agrees to Testify Before Congress About Foreign Donor Vetting&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adam Liptak: &#8220;At Supreme Court, Virginia Democrats Pressed Legal Theory Embraced by Trump&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156193</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 19:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[legislation and legislatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statutory interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156193</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/16/us/at-supreme-court-virginia-democrats-pressed-legal-theory-embraced-by-trump.html">Liptak news analysis </a>in the NYT:</p>
<p>Virginia Democrats suffered a stinging loss in their state Supreme Court this month. Its justices, by a 4 to 3 vote,&#160;<a href="https://www.vacourts.gov/static/opinions/opnscvwp/1260127.pdf" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">rejected a voting map</a>&#160;that would probably have flipped four seats in the&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156193" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156193">Adam Liptak: &#8220;At Supreme Court, Virginia Democrats Pressed Legal Theory Embraced by Trump&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Political Money Is Flowing to Influencers. But From Whom?&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156191</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Hasen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 19:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaigns]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156191</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="NYT:">NYT:</a></p>
<p>Last month, Carlos Eduardo Espina, a progressive influencer, revealed a surprising endorsement to his 14.5 million followers on TikTok: He would support Tom Steyer, the billionaire running for California governor as a Democrat.</p>
<p>“I really believe Tom Steyer is&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156191" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156191">&#8220;Political Money Is Flowing to Influencers. But From Whom?&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Attitudes Toward Electoral System Reform and Party System Change in the U.S.&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156189</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Pildes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 13:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156189</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>From a new<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/attitudes-toward-electoral-system-reform-and-party-system-change-in-the-us/D6C0974F51E699AE8BD4802D1F5A79E5"> paper</a> at APSR by Quinton Mayne and Shane P. Singh.  An interesting study that shows the high value Americans put on governability, in evaluating electoral systems and political reform:</p>
<p>We find that Americans are strongly averse to&#8230; <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156189" class="read-more">Continue reading </a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://electionlawblog.org/?p=156189">&#8220;Attitudes Toward Electoral System Reform and Party System Change in the U.S.&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://electionlawblog.org">Election Law Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
