<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>eLetters</title><link>http://skirocky.typepad.com/eletters/</link><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/eletters" /><description>Fostering discourse; engaging with others; pausing for breath between sentences</description><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:20:10 PST</lastBuildDate><generator>http://www.typepad.com/</generator><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/eletters" /><feedburner:info uri="eletters" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>eletters</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item><title>Getting Stuck in Anger -- And How We Can Do Better</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/eletters/~3/LYy_5oS_Z5M/getting-stuck-in-anger-and-how-we-can-do-better.html</link><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Townsend</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:20:10 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://skirocky.typepad.com/eletters/2008/11/getting-stuck-in-anger-and-how-we-can-do-better.html</guid><description>I didn't expect to become exceedingly angry when I woke up this morning. but that's how it turned out. The trigger: Thomas Friedman's latest column in the New York Times, "All Fall Down." In the column, Mr. Friedman himself is...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eletters?a=LYy_5oS_Z5M:cLnX2210k7s:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eletters?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://skirocky.typepad.com/eletters/2008/11/getting-stuck-in-anger-and-how-we-can-do-better.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Hidden Risks of US "Energy Independence"</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/eletters/~3/y9JAyY_Fd4w/the-hidden-risks-of-us-energy-independence.html</link><category>energy independence</category><category>geopolitics</category><category>global economics</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Townsend</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:58:57 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://skirocky.typepad.com/eletters/2008/09/the-hidden-risks-of-us-energy-independence.html</guid><description>A colleague of mine from Jupiter Research (now merged with Forrester) recently authored a blog post about whether the US could actually declare "energy independence" in the foreseeable future. The post comtained some interesting comments about geopolitics, which I'd like...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eletters?a=y9JAyY_Fd4w:287dhEG5Fts:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eletters?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://skirocky.typepad.com/eletters/2008/09/the-hidden-risks-of-us-energy-independence.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Trouble With Armchairs</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/eletters/~3/ByD84m9Vvng/what-you-can-do-about-the-credit-crisis.html</link><category>credit crisis</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Townsend</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 05:51:13 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://skirocky.typepad.com/eletters/2008/09/what-you-can-do-about-the-credit-crisis.html</guid><description>Have you noticed? Armchairs have proliferated across America. These armchairs seem to be entrenched in every city, town, and village -- perhaps every living room. Since the collapse of Lehman Bros., our country has been a haven for armchair economists,...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eletters?a=ByD84m9Vvng:FuDwMZpAFlc:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eletters?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://skirocky.typepad.com/eletters/2008/09/what-you-can-do-about-the-credit-crisis.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>What Chrome reveals about Google's long-term strategy</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/eletters/~3/7CgdGsPl6yk/what-chrome-reveals-about.html</link><category>business strategy</category><category>Google</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Townsend</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:56:29 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://skirocky.typepad.com/eletters/2008/09/what-chrome-reveals-about.html</guid><description>This post outlines my sense of Google's long-term market strategy, in light of its Chrome release. As a pithy slogan, I would call Google's strategy "1 + 1 + 1 = 1." Or maybe "Three Pillars Make An Institution." Please...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eletters?a=7CgdGsPl6yk:ueolosipFlo:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eletters?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://skirocky.typepad.com/eletters/2008/09/what-chrome-reveals-about.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Seminar on China's foreign policy -- hosted by a Tsinghua scholar</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/eletters/~3/_NXy9LqeqxY/seminar-on-chin.html</link><category>China</category><category>Current Affairs</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Townsend</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:31:17 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://skirocky.typepad.com/eletters/2008/08/seminar-on-chin.html</guid><description>Today I went to a seminar given by Prof. Yan Xuetong of Tsinghua University (which, to a very rough approximation, is China’s equivalent of MIT). Prof. Yan is a foreign policy scholar who came to give a lecture on “Chinese...&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eletters?a=_NXy9LqeqxY:y4eRJjJ2BiI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eletters?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://skirocky.typepad.com/eletters/2008/08/seminar-on-chin.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>

