<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Energy Legal Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://www.energylegalblog.com</link>
	<description>Powered by the attorneys of Bracewell &amp; Giuliani, Energy Legal Blog is your resource for updates and analysis on national and regional energy issues.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/EnergyLegalBlog" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>EnergyLegalBlog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/EnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FEnergyLegalBlog" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>PUCT Denies Kelson’s Unconventional Bid to Interconnect SERC and ERCOT</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/-qknAI-T56U/2015</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/29/2015#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Frazier</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Energy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Transmission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=2015</guid>
		<description>The Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) on June 10, 2009, issued its final order denying Kelson Transmission Company, LLC&amp;#8217;s (Kelson) application for a certificate of convenience and necessity to construct and operate a 95-mile 345 Kilovolt open-access transmission line, for which Kelson initially sought certification in August of 2007.  The transmission line was planned [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/-qknAI-T56U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/29/2015/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/29/2015</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Resuscitated FutureGen Key to International Progress on Climate Change</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/SPas3NlxTr0/2012</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/25/2012#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wolf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Air Quality/Emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=2012</guid>
		<description>The Department of Energy announced June 12 the resumption of work on &amp;#8220;FutureGen,&amp;#8221; a public-private initiative directed at reducing the environmental impact of coal-powered electricity generation.  The concept of FutureGen is attractive to coal-dependent economies domestically and internationally.  It contemplates construction of a coal-fired power plant that produces hydrogen in addition to electricity, utilizing carbon [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/SPas3NlxTr0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/25/2012/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/25/2012</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>FERC Appoints Former Prosecutor as Head of Enforcement Office</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/J9J6URsQLEw/2010</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/24/2010#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Davis</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=2010</guid>
		<description>FERC last week announced the appointment of Norman C. Bay to head its Office of Enforcement.  Professor Bay is a former U.S. Attorney who focused on criminal matters and is currently an associate professor at the University of New Mexico School of Law. The message sent by the appointment of former criminal prosecutor Bay as [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/J9J6URsQLEw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/24/2010/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/24/2010</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Connecticut Attorney General Seeks Disgorgement and Penalties from ISO-NE, Capacity Importers</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/ztnx6AlQ-78/2004</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/24/2004#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Rizzo</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Organized Markets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Regional Energy Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=2004</guid>
		<description>The Attorney General of the State of Connecticut (CT AG), Richard Blumenthal, filed a Complaint requesting Investigation, Hearing, Disgorgement and other penalties against ISO-New England, Inc. (ISO-NE) and Certain Unidentified Market Participant Importer(s) of Installed Capacity on April 20, 2009 based in part on ISO-NE&amp;#8217;s statements that such sellers with contracts over the Northern New [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/ztnx6AlQ-78" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/24/2004/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/24/2004</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Different Takes on Taxing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Allowances</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/mWDJKho2CXk/1981</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/18/1981#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wolf</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Air Quality/Emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=1981</guid>
		<description>The US Senate Committee on Finance entertained divergent views on the Federal income tax implications of proposed cap-and-trade legislation to reduce carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions during a June 15 hearing.  Among the issue aired was whether emission allowances under the program should be treated as ordinary for tax purposes and, if so, then [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/mWDJKho2CXk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/18/1981/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/18/1981</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>California AG Levels New Claims Against Sellers for 2000-2001 Energy Debacle</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/rlw25EtjztE/1989</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/17/1989#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Rizzo</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Regional Energy Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=1989</guid>
		<description>California Attorney General Jerry Brown filed a complaint on May 22 against 18 named sellers who made sales to the California Energy Resources Scheduling (CERS) Division of the California Department of Water Resources eight years ago from January 18 to June 20, 2001.   The complaint alleges, among other things, that the named respondent sellers:  (1) possessed [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/rlw25EtjztE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/17/1989/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/17/1989</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress Proposes New Enforcement Authority for FERC</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/mLyfIORtqBs/1946</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/15/1946#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Frazier</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FERC Actions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas/LNG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=1946</guid>
		<description>The American Clean Energy And Security Act of 2009 (&amp;#8221;ACES&amp;#8221;), or H.R. 2454,  is a comprehensive energy bill that was introduced on May 15, 2009.  ACES contains new enforcement provisions that would significantly increase the authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (&amp;#8221;FERC&amp;#8221; or &amp;#8220;Commission&amp;#8221;) by empowering FERC to require jurisdictional entities to terminate behavior [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/mLyfIORtqBs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/15/1946/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/15/1946</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Better All the Time:  FERC-State Cooperation Offshore</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/mIq4zbajebE/1943</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/12/1943#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew McLain</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Offshore]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Regional Energy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=1943</guid>
		<description> 
On June 4, FERC inked a memorandum of understanding (MOU)  with the state of Washington to coordinate reviews of hydrokinetic projects located offshore in state waters.  The MOU with Washington comes on the heels of an anticipated agreement between FERC and MMS, which memorialized a truce between the two agencies as to which possessed primary [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/mIq4zbajebE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/12/1943/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/12/1943</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>FERC Seeks Input on Smart Grid Rate Recovery</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/ebWaStXXpp0/1931</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/08/1931#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Frazier</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Transmission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=1931</guid>
		<description>On May 21, 2009, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (&amp;#8221;FERC&amp;#8221;) solicited supplemental comments in the Smart Grid Policy docket specifically related to how it should address requests for rate recovery from public utilities to install Smart Grid facilities that are not paid for through U.S. Department of Energy (&amp;#8221;DOE&amp;#8221;) funds, such as those authorized under [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/ebWaStXXpp0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/08/1931/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/08/1931</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>FERC Approves Funding Plan for Major International Transmission Line Over Protests</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~3/qiASyOEHgpY/1924</link>
		<comments>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/05/1924#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Davis</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[National Energy Law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Transmission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energylegalblog.com/?p=1924</guid>
		<description>In a May 21 order, FERC approved a cost-based, participant-funded proposal by Northeast Utilities Service Co. and NSTAR Electric Co. to develop a new transmission project linking ISO New England with Hydro-Québec. The project, a 1200-MW, high-voltage direct-current transmission line, will cross the US-Canadian border and connect Hydro- Québec's system with a point in southern New Hampshire. The line will bring large amounts of hydropower from Québec into ISO New England, displacing some of the existing gas-fired generation in New England. FERC Commissioners hailed the project as a way to get substantial amounts of low-cost, clean energy into ISO New England.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyLegalBlog/~4/qiASyOEHgpY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/05/1924/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.energylegalblog.com/archives/2009/06/05/1924</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
