<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0"><channel><title>ENGLISH EDUCATION</title><description></description><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Mehar Bhagat)</managingEditor><pubDate>Wed, 4 Jun 2025 03:29:51 -0700</pubDate><generator>Blogger http://www.blogger.com</generator><openSearch:totalResults xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/">9</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/">1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/">25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><link>http://englisheducationwithme.blogspot.com/</link><language>en-us</language><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle/><itunes:owner><itunes:email>noreply@blogger.com</itunes:email></itunes:owner><item><title>SUBJECTS AND PREDICATES</title><link>http://englisheducationwithme.blogspot.com/2009/04/subjects-and-predicates.html</link><category>education</category><category>english</category><category>grammer</category><category>predicates</category><category>subject</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mehar Bhagat)</author><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:34:00 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8918686592519073920.post-6127553548171260085</guid><description>&lt;div style="text-align: justify;"&gt;Although sentences can be infinitely rich and complex, they are based on nouns&lt;br /&gt;and verbs. Nearly everything else provides information about the nouns and&lt;br /&gt;verbs in some way.&lt;br /&gt;we can say that nouns tend to be the names of things, whereas verbs tend&lt;br /&gt;to be words that describe actions and states of being. On this basis, we can see&lt;br /&gt;that sentences generally express two types of relations: (a) an agent performing&lt;br /&gt;an action; (b) existence. Sentences 1 and 2 illustrate the two types.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Dogs bark.&lt;br /&gt;2. The tree was tall.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The word dogs is the agent of sentence 1. It performs the action conveyed in&lt;br /&gt;the word bark. We also can say that dogs is the subject of the sentence. Thus,&lt;br /&gt;subject is our first function category. The word bark supplies information about&lt;br /&gt;dogs, stating or describing what they do.Words that state an action of this sort&lt;br /&gt;and that supply information about the nature of subjects or what they are doing&lt;br /&gt;are referred to as predicates. Thus, predicate is our second function category.A&lt;br /&gt;predicate consists of the main verb of a sentence and all the words associated&lt;br /&gt;with it. Although in sentence 2 the tree is not an agent, the sentence expresses a&lt;br /&gt;fact about the tree’s existence—it was tall. The tree, therefore, is the subject,&lt;br /&gt;and was tall is the predicate. Understanding subject and predicate is important&lt;br /&gt;because these are the two central functional parts of all sentences. If one is&lt;br /&gt;missing, we don’t have a sentence. Functionally, everything else in a sentence&lt;br /&gt;is related to its subject and predicate in some way.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></item><item><title>Clauses</title><link>http://englisheducationwithme.blogspot.com/2009/04/clauses.html</link><category>clauses</category><category>education</category><category>english</category><category>grammer</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Mehar Bhagat)</author><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:31:00 -0700</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8918686592519073920.post-5431394815469390936</guid><description>All sentences in English can be divided into the two constituents of subject and predicate, even when, as sometimes occurs, the subject isn’t an explicit part of a given sentence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Almost everything else that one may see in a sentence will be part of either the subject or the predicate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In addition, a subject/predicate combination constitutes what is referred to as a clause.&lt;br /&gt;This means that every sentence is a clause.</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></item><item><title>PRONOUNS</title><link>http://englisheducationwithme.blogspot.com/2009/02/pronouns.html</link><category>education</category><category>english</category><category>grammer</category><category>nouns</category><category>pronouns</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:45:00 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8918686592519073920.post-5999643143398152148</guid><description>English, like other languages, resists the duplication of nouns in sentences, so it replaces duplicated nouns with what are called pronouns. (No one is sure why languages resist such duplication.) The nouns that get replaced are called antecedents.&lt;br /&gt;  Consider sentence 1:&lt;br /&gt;1. Rahul liked Divya, so Rahul took Divya to a movie.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The duplication of the proper nouns Rahul and Divya just does not sound right to most people because English generally does not allow it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The duplicated nouns are replaced, as in sentence 1a:&lt;br /&gt;1a. Rahul liked Divya, so he took her to a movie.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Notice that sentence 1b also is acceptable:&lt;br /&gt;1b. He liked her, so Rahul took Divya to a movie.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this instance, however, sentence 1b is not quite as appropriate as 1a because the sentence lacks a context. Real sentences, as opposed to those that appear in books like this one, are part of a context that includes the complexities of human relationships; prior knowledge related to past, present, and future events; and, of course, prior conversations. The pronouns in sentence 1b suggest that Rahul and Divya already have been identified or are known. This suggestion is contrary to fact. In sentence 1a, on the other hand, Rahul and Divya appear in the first part of the sentence, so the pronouns are linked to these antecedents without any doubt or confusion about which nouns the pronouns have replaced. At work is an important principle for pronouns: They should appear as close to their antecedents as possible to avoid potential confusion.</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></item><item><title>Common Nouns, Proper Nouns, and Mass Nouns</title><link>http://englisheducationwithme.blogspot.com/2009/02/common-nouns-proper-nouns-and-mass.html</link><category>education</category><category>english</category><category>grammer</category><category>nouns</category><category>pronouns</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:41:00 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8918686592519073920.post-6038029362076852723</guid><description>There are three major types of nouns.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Common nouns&lt;/span&gt;, as the name suggests, are the largest variety. Common nouns signify a general class of words used in naming and include such words as those in the following list: car, shoe, computer, baby, disk, pad,etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Proper nouns&lt;/span&gt;, on the other hand, are specific names, such as Mr. smith.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Mass nouns&lt;/span&gt; are a special category of common nouns. What makes them distinct is that, unlike simple common nouns, they cannot be counted. Below is a short list of mass nouns: deer, air, mud, research, meat,etc.</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></item><item><title>NOUNS</title><link>http://englisheducationwithme.blogspot.com/2009/02/nouns.html</link><category>education</category><category>english</category><category>grammer</category><category>nouns</category><category>pronouns</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:51:00 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8918686592519073920.post-1427924277069463522</guid><description>As noted earlier, subjects and predicates are related to nouns and verbs. Traditional grammar defines a noun as a person, place, or thing. However, this definition is not the best because it isn’t sufficiently inclusive. The word Monday, for example, is a noun, but it is not a thing, nor is freedom or any number of other words. For this reason, it is tempting to define a noun in terms of function:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;A noun is any word that can function as a subject&lt;/span&gt;.</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></item><item><title>Phrases</title><link>http://englisheducationwithme.blogspot.com/2009/02/phrases.html</link><category>education</category><category>english</category><category>grammer</category><category>nouns</category><category>pronouns</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:42:00 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8918686592519073920.post-3717017059524960999</guid><description>Although nouns and verbs provide an adequate classification system for very simple grammatical analyzes, they do not sufficiently account for the fact that sentences are made up of groups of words (and not just subjects and predicates) that function together. Subjects, for example, are not always composed of a single noun; more often than not they are made up of a noun and one or more other words working in conjunction with the noun. For this reason, the discussions that follow use the term phrase regularly. A phrase can be defined as one or more words functioning together as a unit that does not constitute a clause. On this account, the subject and predicate of Dogs bark are made up of a noun phrase (NP) and a verb phrase (VP), respectively, and in The tree was tall, the subject, The tree, also is a noun phrase.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We generally identify a phrase on the basis of a key word at its beginning, such as a noun or a verb. Consider these examples:&lt;br /&gt;• flowers in her hair&lt;br /&gt;• running with the bulls&lt;br /&gt;In the first case, the phrase begins with flowers, which is a noun. In the second case, the phrase begins with running, which is a verb.We also refer to these words as head words because they are at the head of the phrase and the other words in the phrase are attached to them.</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></item><item><title>Independent and Dependent Clauses</title><link>http://englisheducationwithme.blogspot.com/2009/02/independent-and-dependent-clauses.html</link><category>education</category><category>english</category><category>grammer</category><category>nouns</category><category>pronouns</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:39:00 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8918686592519073920.post-1191411429572297058</guid><description>There are two major types of clauses: Independent and dependent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One way to differentiate the two types is to understand that dependent clauses always supply information to an independent clause. That is, they function as modifiers. Another way is to understand that dependent clauses begin with a word (sometimes two words) that links them to an independent clause. A clause that begins with one of these words cannot function as a sentence. Only independent clauses can function as sentences. Listed in the following table are some of these words: because, if, as, until, since, whereas, although, though, while.</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></item><item><title>FORM AND FUNCTION IN GRAMMAR</title><link>http://englisheducationwithme.blogspot.com/2009/02/form-and-function-in-grammar.html</link><category>education</category><category>english</category><category>grammer</category><category>nouns</category><category>pronouns</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:41:00 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8918686592519073920.post-1356320394701358338</guid><description>&lt;div style="text-align: left;"&gt;Grammar deals with the structure and analysis of sentences. Any discussion of grammar, therefore, must address language on two levels, which we may think of as form and function. Sentences are made up of individual words, and these words fall into certain grammatical categories. This is their form. A word like Macarena, for example, is a noun—this is its form. A word like jump is a verb, a word like red is an adjective, and so on.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The form of a word is generally independent of a sentence. Dictionaries are an exploration not only of meaning but also of form because they describe the grammatical category or categories of each entry. But language exists primarily as sentences, not individual words, and as soon as we put words into sentences they work together in various ways—this is function. For example, nouns can function as subjects, adjectives modify (supply information to) nouns, and verbs establish predicates.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Form and function are related in several ways. For example, on a simple level, the terms we use to describe grammatical form and function come from the Greco-Roman tradition. Noun comes from the Latin word, nomen, for name; verb comes from the Latin verbum, for word; predicate comes from the Latin word, praedicare, to proclaim. On a deeper level, the form of a given&lt;br /&gt;word often determines its function in a sentence—and vice versa.&lt;/div&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></item><item><title>Grammar History</title><link>http://englisheducationwithme.blogspot.com/2009/02/grammar-history.html</link><category>education</category><category>english</category><category>grammer</category><category>nouns</category><category>pronouns</category><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:05:00 -0800</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8918686592519073920.post-8421692267205570672</guid><description>Grammar is a term used to mean many different things.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many years ago, &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Hartwell (1985)&lt;/span&gt; organized some of these different&lt;br /&gt;meanings in an attempt to clarify our understanding of grammar by offering&lt;br /&gt;five different definitions, summarized here:&lt;br /&gt;1. A set of formal patterns in which the words of a language are arranged to convey&lt;br /&gt;a larger meaning.&lt;br /&gt;2. The branch of linguistics concerned with the description, analysis, and formulation&lt;br /&gt;of formal language patterns.&lt;br /&gt;3. Linguistic etiquette.&lt;br /&gt;4. School grammar, or the names of the parts of speech.&lt;br /&gt;5. Grammatical terms used in the interest of teaching writing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;definition of grammar&lt;/span&gt; that is concise but that is&lt;br /&gt;sufficiently broad to include a wide range of language features and forms:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(51, 0, 0);"&gt;Grammar is the formal study of the structure of a language and describes&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; color: rgb(51, 0, 0);"&gt;how words fit together in meaningful constructions.&lt;/span&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>