<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel><generator>http://textpattern.com/?v=4.0.5</generator>
<title>E-Team | Commentaries</title>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/</link>
<description>Providing Accurate Information on Energy &amp; Environment Issues</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:35:07 GMT</pubDate>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://eteam.ncpa.org/commentary.xml" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly>This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader, subject to copyright and fair use.</feedburner:browserFriendly><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item><title>Time for Inaction on Global Warming</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Congress should consider the costs before passing &amp;#8220;cap and trade.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?a=NOX5zoW-29A:mbU9pkuLacc:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/commentaries/time-for-inaction-on-global-warming</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:24:58 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Reid</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:environment.ncpa.org,2009-10-20:f872cff4320616338ea6db788c51b570/624d9aba47507203c2f55402ca822f95</guid>
</item>
<item><title>Solar Sticker Shock Hits Washington County</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Kittitas County, Washington is experiencing sticker shock as the true cost of solar power is coming in at more than three times the promised price.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;In less than one month&amp;#8217;s time, the cost estimate for a proposed 75 megawatt solar power plant has soared by more than 200 percent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?a=42bIppzmEHE:94eCPSJLk8I:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/commentaries/solar-sticker-shock-hits-washington-county</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:05:08 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Danny Foreman</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:environment.ncpa.org,2009-10-15:f872cff4320616338ea6db788c51b570/d119625c1d710046308ffe712a50aebd</guid>
</item>
<item><title>New North Dakota Oil Find Could Be a Gusher</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Dozens of very productive new wells near North Dakota&amp;#8217;s Bakken oil field have state officials believing another massive new oil find may be at hand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?a=3VAvni40V-4:w-s8iOZ1ST8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/commentaries/new-north-dakota-oil-find-could-be-a-gusher</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:06:19 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>wgoriola</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:environment.ncpa.org,2009-09-08:f872cff4320616338ea6db788c51b570/ed53cbc8a3d4c206a3e08d2cd6f6ae45</guid>
</item>
<item><title>Carbon Offsets: Scam, Not Salvation</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;In the battle against climate change, most media attention has been paid to &amp;#8220;cap-and-trade&amp;#8221; schemes, under which countries set upper limits (&amp;#8220;caps&amp;#8221;) on greenhouse gas (&lt;span class="caps"&gt;GHG&lt;/span&gt;) emissions and allow companies to sell (&amp;#8220;trade&amp;#8221;) unused emissions rights to other firms. However, there is a second path to global warming salvation: Carbon offsets.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?a=yIWhIvI8onM:9QaAGAYfRy4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/commentaries/carbon-offsets-scam-not-salvation</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 14:59:26 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Reid</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:environment.ncpa.org,2009-08-03:f872cff4320616338ea6db788c51b570/4816ac51d4b98e5ff07c363fe33fc76a</guid>
</item>
<item><title>H. Sterling Burnett: Developing shale oil may solve our energy crisis</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Politicians lament the fact that the United States imports about 66 percent of its oil &amp;#8212; about 9,000 barrels every minute. Yet Congress has done little to remedy the situation. Instead, it has all too often erected barriers to domestic energy production.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?a=e5sXrk76XGQ:gkyanlqnjck:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/commentaries/h-sterling-burnett-developing-shale-oil-may-solve-our-energy-crisis</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Reid</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:environment.ncpa.org,2009-07-29:f872cff4320616338ea6db788c51b570/5135738283e96292b788aed01064cdd2</guid>
</item>
<item><title>Waxman-Markey Deserves to Die</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The fresh news about Washington&amp;#8212;the White House and Congress&amp;#8212;is that things are not going very well. A new president in full command of public-policy matters is having problems, from health care to taxes to massive federal spending and now to the Waxman-Markey bill, one of the oddest and most far-reaching pieces of legislation advocated by the new administration. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?a=zRHHNr6j3o0:9jKTMiAFdG4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/commentaries/waxman-markey-deserves-to-die</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:35:29 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Reid</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:environment.ncpa.org,2009-07-30:f872cff4320616338ea6db788c51b570/7fb17a2548c5b87cd2dc9419405c2fec</guid>
</item>
<item><title>Waxman-Markey Bill Would Raise Electricity Prices $846 Billion</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The Waxman-Markey bill to restrict carbon dioxide emissions would cost $846 billion in the next decade alone, in the form of required payments for emissions allowances, according to a June 5 report from the Congressional Budget Office.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?a=7pUHZawe4iY:-YgWKAylO_I:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/commentaries/waxman-markey-bill-would-raise-electricity-prices-846-billion</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:03:16 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Reid</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:environment.ncpa.org,2009-07-15:f872cff4320616338ea6db788c51b570/915da287176e643b6ade5b92bca6fe11</guid>
</item>
<item><title>The Big Chill</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Congress shouldn&amp;#8217;t fight global warming by freezing the economy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?a=Gz321U0DpnU:5ILRZe8ZBQc:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/commentaries/the-big-chill2</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:20:10 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Reid</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:environment.ncpa.org,2009-06-19:f872cff4320616338ea6db788c51b570/5665b367b566bc41168493772e5f2f48</guid>
</item>
<item><title>Climate bill seems pretty dim</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s been called a highly regressive tax, imposing relatively higher costs on the poor. Another agrees that it would impose a larger burden, relative to income, on low-income households than on high-income households. And these are just its advocates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?a=nnL_FEbM6JI:TDBSmtr6fIw:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/commentaries/climate-bill-seems-pretty-dim</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:18:15 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Reid</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:environment.ncpa.org,2009-06-19:f872cff4320616338ea6db788c51b570/1b367c234b95a7572bceb8a802e40b90</guid>
</item>
<item><title>Removing the Political Shortage of Water</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;About 82 percent of Americans receive drinking water via publicly owned water systems, according to the federal Environmental Protection Agency (&lt;span class="caps"&gt;EPA&lt;/span&gt;). Many of these municipal and regional systems operate at a loss, meaning users’ fees don’t cover the cost of treating and delivering the water.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?a=RnttbzoJhBo:8Zj9GI9uOYY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/commentaries/removing-the-political-shortage-of-water</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:22:57 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Reid</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:environment.ncpa.org,2009-06-12:f872cff4320616338ea6db788c51b570/05cad1dc8465ef3dfe59acf08769c81a</guid>
</item>
<item><title>Sapping America's Energy</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;If Americans don&amp;#8217;t start paying attention to what Congress is up to, our nation&amp;#8217;s energy policy may seriously change for the worse. A bill styled the American Clean Energy and Security Act, sponsored by Democrats Henry Waxman of California and Edward Markey of Massachusetts, soon goes before the House. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?a=4UmjYJsGEjA:FzKC3UD2Txs:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/commentaries/sapping-americas-energy</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:14:24 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Reid</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:environment.ncpa.org,2009-04-17:f872cff4320616338ea6db788c51b570/ea846bba05fe384935a7e7a722535d2b</guid>
</item>
<item><title>Los Angeles Voters Reject Solar Initiative</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;In a surprising blow to environmental activists and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers union, Los Angeles voters rejected a ballot initiative that would have required the city to install 400 megawatts of solar panels by 2014.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?a=7o9Yi5akwDA:rSagQCWkm3c:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/commentaries/los-angeles-voters-reject-solar-initiative</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:58:52 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Reid</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:environment.ncpa.org,2009-04-15:f872cff4320616338ea6db788c51b570/aaa93e03030e5e350afb57e0b81a6f02</guid>
</item>
<item><title>EPA Considers California Greenhouse Gas Waiver</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The National Center for Policy Analysis appreciates the opportunity to comment on the President&amp;#8217;s request to the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EPA&lt;/span&gt; to reconsider its previous denial of California&amp;#8217;s 2005 Waiver of Federal Preemption under Section 209(b) of the Clean Air Act. We would like to take this opportunity to caution &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EPA&lt;/span&gt; Administrator Jackson against reversing the denial of the request made by former &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EPA&lt;/span&gt; Administrator Johnson in 2008. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?a=6IsJ0jS02tg:rDXm49yB5Pg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/commentaries/Burnett_Commentary_04102009</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:53:15 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Reid</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:environment.ncpa.org,2009-04-13:f872cff4320616338ea6db788c51b570/e42fd7fa3e5c0986dcc7195ce31bb0f3</guid>
</item>
<item><title>Carbon offsets scam</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;While much media attention has been paid to &amp;#8220;cap-and-trade&amp;#8221; schemes as a way to prevent global warming, there is a second path to global warming salvation &amp;#8211; carbon offsets. Indeed, the House Energy and Environment Subcommittee hosted hearings recently on how to use carbon offsets to reduce the costs of reducing greenhouse gas emissions &amp;#8211; it promises to be more smoke and mirrors. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?a=97Ll3LgHyWE:6qdLWILhuO0:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/commentaries/carbon-offsets-scam</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 13:35:03 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Reid</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:environment.ncpa.org,2009-03-09:f872cff4320616338ea6db788c51b570/f930b87a69cbb932ced6840990465579</guid>
</item>
<item><title>The Sky Is Falling?</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Imagine it is 1979 &amp;#8212; nine years before &lt;span class="caps"&gt;NASA&lt;/span&gt;&amp;#8217;s James Hansen first stoked fears of human-caused global warming in testimony before a Senate committee chaired by then Sen. Al Gore. Few people in the mid- to late-970s were thinking about the terrors of global warming; science journals, major newspapers, and newsmagazines instead were focused on a 20-year cooling trend that some claimed was a possible harbinger of a coming ice age.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?a=VtpLGQjgbc8:CiKDJM3gtDk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/eteam/commentaries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<link>http://environment.ncpa.org/commentaries/the-sky-is-falling</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:33:57 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Reid</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:environment.ncpa.org,2009-01-13:f872cff4320616338ea6db788c51b570/a02ce7c39bcaef8ff0bed1b6cd12899f</guid>
</item></channel>
</rss>
