<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>The Ethicurean: Chew the right thing. » Digest</title>
	
	<link>http://www.ethicurean.com</link>
	<description>A group blog about the quest for tasty things that are also sustainable, organic, local, and/or ethical — SOLE food, for short. Regular news roundups of food politics, along with rants, recipes, and reviews.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ethicurean/digest" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Scientists monitor tuna by measuring toxins</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ethicurean/digest/~3/hz1KrTNAdyE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/13/monitoring-tuna/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethicurean</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digest]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fish]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bluefin tuna]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tuna]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicurean.com/?p=6173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toxins tell tuna&#8217;s tale:  The Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) population is split into two groups, with the 45 degree meridian acting as a rough dividing line. Some fish swim across the line to feed or spawn, and scientists and fishery managers would like to know how many fish make the ocean crossing. Naomi Lubick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Toxins tell tuna&#8217;s tale</strong>:  The Atlantic bluefin tuna (<em>Thunnus thynnus</em>) population is split into two groups, with the 45 degree meridian acting as a rough dividing line. Some fish swim across the line to feed or spawn, and scientists and fishery managers would like to know how many fish make the ocean crossing. Naomi Lubick reports on a new research paper that uses two potent classes of pollutants — polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and chlordanes — as a geographical tracers. By looking at the ratio of the various chemicals, the scientists can tell where the fish have been. Chlordanes are especially good because they are banned in the European Union, so if chlordane residue appears in a tuna caught in the Mediterranean, the fish must have spent time in the western Atlantic. The initial data show that more eastern Atlantic fish visit the western Atlantic than was previously assumed.  (<a href="http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es903057g">Environmental Science and Technology</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/13/monitoring-tuna/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/13/monitoring-tuna/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Urban farmers confront zoning regulations in, around Kansas City</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ethicurean/digest/~3/zAytmrDxyGg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/09/kansas-urban-farmers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethicurean</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digest]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Urban Farming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicurean.com/?p=6143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plowing up zoning restrictions: As urban farming grows, so do conflicts between city zoning laws and farmers. The Kansas City, Mo., City Council is looking to ease some restrictions, while other cities in the area stand firm. The issues — involving where these farmers can farm and sell produce, as well as all manner of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Plowing up zoning restrictions:</strong> As urban farming grows, so do conflicts between city zoning laws and farmers. The Kansas City, Mo., City Council is looking to ease some restrictions, while other cities in the area stand firm. The issues — involving where these farmers can farm and sell produce, as well as all manner of livestock questions — tend to pit neighborhood ambiance against the interests of farmers and their customers. (<a href="http://www.kansascity.com/105/story/1554140.html">Kansas City Star</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/09/kansas-urban-farmers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/09/kansas-urban-farmers/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Out of conservation, back to production</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ethicurean/digest/~3/B9sdgWPEdu8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/07/conservation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethicurean</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digest]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicurean.com/?p=6133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good soil deed about to be uprooted: Millions of acres of environmentally sensitive lands are being pushed out of the federal Conservation Reserve Program and, most likely, back into production. The program was created to stabilize commodity prices while saving topsoil, improving water quality and creating wildlife habit. But the always short-sighted Farm Bill&#8217;s latest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Good soil deed about to be uprooted</strong>: Millions of acres of environmentally sensitive lands are being pushed out of the federal Conservation Reserve Program and, most likely, back into production. The program was created to stabilize commodity prices while saving topsoil, improving water quality and creating wildlife habit. But the always short-sighted Farm Bill&#8217;s latest version reduced allowable acreage for the program. Good-bye, reestablished prairie and clearer-flowing streams; hello, combine and erosion. (<a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gBCPjsIhjO0RjXoKHG0S5CMdyuRAD9BOJU2G1">Associated Press</a>) Maybe a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/05/opinion/05berry.html">50-year Farm Bill</a> is a good idea after all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/07/conservation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/07/conservation/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Genetically modified corn growers not obeying rules designed to maintain pest resistance</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ethicurean/digest/~3/onQxqryJHiQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/05/gm-corn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethicurean</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digest]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GMOs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/05/gm-corn/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stop bugging me: As many as 25% of the American farmers growing genetically engineered corn are no longer complying with federal rules intended to maintain the resistance of the crops to damage from insects, according to a Center for Science in the Public Interest report released Thursday based on EPA records. (CSPI does not oppose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stop bugging me:</strong> As many as 25% of the American farmers growing genetically engineered corn are no longer complying with federal rules intended to maintain the resistance of the crops to damage from insects, according to a Center for Science in the Public Interest report released Thursday based on EPA records. (CSPI does not oppose GE crops, but does favor stricter regulation.) The crops in question, called BT corn, have bacterial genes spliced into their DNA that cause the plants to make toxins that kill certain insects when they feed on the crop. The EPA requires farmers in the Corn Belt to plant 20% of their fields with non-BT corn to serve as a refuge for insects and hopefully promote cross breeding between resistant and nonresistant bugs, but farmers have stopped complying. The seed companies ahve been trying to encourage them to do so, with postcards and billboards, but higher corn prices seem to exert more immediate sway than fear of super-bugs. (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/06/business/06corn.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business">New York Times</a>) This reminds us of certain software companies that depend on users to download and install cumbersome patches to address their operating system&#8217;s security holes — and when they don&#8217;t, the entire network (or ecosystem) is left vulnerable instead.&nbsp; &nbsp; </p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=6a2c4ab0-3e8c-8a5c-a18b-f258855656cf" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/05/gm-corn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/05/gm-corn/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Oakland has 1,200 acres of public land</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ethicurean/digest/~3/GwS1WjHxsJ8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/02/oakland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethicurean</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digest]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Eat local]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Urban Farming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/02/oakland/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ready, set, grow!: A new report released today  by UrbanFood.org, with support from the HOPE Collaborative and City Slicker Farms, has identified 1,200 acres of vacant and underutilized public land in Oakland, California, that could potentially be used for food production. If only half of it were cultivated, then it could supply 5% of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ready, set, grow!:</strong> A new report released today  by UrbanFood.org, with support from the HOPE Collaborative and City Slicker Farms, has identified 1,200 acres of vacant and underutilized public land in Oakland, California, that could potentially be used for food production. If only half of it were cultivated, then it could supply 5% of Oakland&#8217;s vegetable needs, the reports says. (<a href="http://oaklandlocal.com/article/community-news-new-report-reveals-potential-food-production-oakland%E2%80%99s-public-land">Oakland Local</a>) The Ethicurean&#8217;s editor, an Oakland resident, observes that all soil would need to be tested for heavy metals and contaminants first, of course, but that turning these blighted vacant lots into food gardens could create jobs and neighborhood pride in a city sorely lacking both. Why not turn some into community gardens, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/12/AR2009051201455.html">as they do in Britain</a>?</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=7412bb48-9671-8844-baee-765a9fb43826" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/02/oakland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/02/oakland/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Report scrutinizes ties between Big Food, health organizations</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ethicurean/digest/~3/PKw_qCRMuBg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/02/big-food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Janet</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digest]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicurean.com/?p=6121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Ignore the man behind the curtain: Reporters Rick Montgomery and Alan Bavley examine the “marriages of convenience” between unhealthy food producers and organizations aimed at promoting health, such as the newly announced alliance between Coca Cola and the American Academy of Family Physicians. (Kansas City Star) So depressing that these supposed health groups are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> Ignore the man behind the curtain</strong>: Reporters Rick Montgomery and Alan Bavley examine the “marriages of convenience” between unhealthy food producers and organizations aimed at promoting health, such as the newly announced alliance between Coca Cola and the American Academy of Family Physicians. (<a href="http://www.kansascity.com/healthyquestions/story/1541885.html">Kansas City Star</a>) So depressing that these supposed health groups are so willing to sell their names to companies whose success lies in adding pounds of flesh to their customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/02/big-food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/11/02/big-food/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Special Digest: Have a raw milk shake, “he said/she said” style</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ethicurean/digest/~3/99v0NvRI01Y/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/10/30/raw-milk-shake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethicurean</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digest]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Raw milk]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Alternet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Amanda Rose]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bill Marler]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[David Gumpert]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethicurean]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jill Richardson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mark McAfee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Organic Pastures]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[outsourcing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Raw Milk Revolution]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ted Beals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[WAPF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicurean.com/?p=6095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are frothy days for the debate over access to unpasteurized milk. Business-reporter-turned-raw-milk-blogger David Gumpert has a new book out, &#8220;The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America&#8217;s Emerging Battle Over Food Rights&#8220;; Ethicurean review coming soon. And friends o&#8217;Ethicurean Jill Richardson and Amanda Rose have each been engaging in raw-milk battles this month.
Round One: Jill Richardson [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are frothy days for the debate over access to unpasteurized milk. Business-reporter-turned-raw-milk-blogger David Gumpert has a new book out, &#8220;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1603582193?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=theethi-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=1603582193">The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America&#8217;s Emerging Battle Over Food Rights</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=theethi-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1603582193" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" />&#8220;; Ethicurean review coming soon. And friends o&#8217;Ethicurean Jill Richardson and Amanda Rose have each been engaging in raw-milk battles this month.</p>
<p><strong>Round One: Jill Richardson v. Mark Mcafee<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Richardson, who blogs indefatigably at <a href="http://www.lavidalocavore.org/">La Vida Locavore</a>, offers a provocative <a href="http://www.alternet.org/healthwellness/143572/the_battle_over_raw_milk%3A_let%27s_ditch_the_hysterics_and_give_people_a_choice" target="_blank">article</a> this week on Alternet arguing that we “ditch the hysterics” over raw milk and work with regulators to form some sort of regulatory compromise whereby consumers can access raw milk more easily if they choose. As an example of difficulty in regulation, Richardson points to the large California raw milk operation <a href="http://organicpastures.com/" target="_blank">Organic Pastures</a>, which has drawn regulatory fire in the past. Among Organic Pastures&#8217; offenses, Richardson writes, have been relying on other producers but not disclosing this practice:  “He outsources some of his production as his demand outstrips his supply. However, that means that he does not have direct control over all of the dairy products sold under his label, and it also means that his customers have relatively little information about where their raw dairy products come from,” she writes.</p>
<p>“Organic Pastures Dairy has never ever bottled one ounce of another dairies raw milk&#8230;not one drop. This is a blatant lie and an untruth spoken to try and hurt OPDC and mislead our consumers. I ask you to print a retraction or face a letter from our attorney,” shot backdairy owner Mark McAfee in the comments section.</p>
<p>Ethicurean contributor Amanda Rose has written here and elsewhere that Organic Pastures has admitted to outsourcing for <a href="http://www.thecompletepatient.com/journal/2007/9/12/will-the-real-mark-mcafee-please-stand-up-the-downside-of-hi.html" target="_blank">cream</a>, <a href="http://www.organicpastures.com/sj-merc-response.html" target="_blank">colostrum</a>, <a href="http://www.thecompletepatient.com/journal/2009/10/22/watch-ga-raw-milk-victims-complete-the-humiliation-of-punish.html" target="_blank">cheese</a>, and butter products [<a href="http://www.organicpastures.com/pdfs/cream_recall_info.pdf" target="_blank">PDF</a>], as late as <a href="http://www.rebuild-from-depression.com/blog/2008/04/the_elephant_in_the_raw_milk_r.html" target="_blank">March of 2009</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Round Two: Amanda Rose v. Ted Beals<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Rose’s scrap began this summer in her Ethicurean post &#8220;<a href="http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/07/20/raw-milk-2/">Memo to raw milk advocates: Improve information, or get sued</a>,&#8221; which remains the most-commented post for this blog. In it, she describes how food injury attorney Bill Marler had threatened to sue the natural-foods advocacy group the Weston A. Price Foundation over inaccurate information. For an example of this, she cited the idea of competitive exclusion – the advocates&#8217; claim that raw milk has components that kill pathogens thereby rendering raw milk “uniquely safe.” The scientific research behind the claim is poor and offers consumers no guarantee of safe milk, she argued in a <a href="http://rawmilkwhitepapers.com/" target="_blank">white paper</a> she wrote on the topic.</p>
<p>Within weeks of Rose’s paper, WAPF self-styled raw-milk expert and retired physician Ted Beals wrote a response to Rose in the fall issue of the WAPF journal Wise Traditions [<a href="http://realmilk.com/documents/PathogensinRawMilk.pdf" target="_blank">PDF</a>], posted prominently on the RealMilk.com <a href="http://realmilk.com/" target="_blank">homepage</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;One of the basic myths of the anti-raw milk folks is that it doesn’t make any difference how few pathogens get into the milk…even one bacterium will rapidly multiply until everything is overwhelmed with bad bugs. All of the publications Amanda Rose selected demonstrate this scare tactic. Pathogens do not rapidly multiply in milk that is fresh and unpasteurized, they do not grow, in fact they die off.&#8221; [p 102]</p>
<p>In a detailed <a href="http://www.rebuild-from-depression.com/blog/2009/10/does_raw_milk_kill_pathogens_a.html" target="_blank">response</a> Rose wrote on her other blog, Rose noted that Beals provides no data to support the claim of raw milk’s unique safety and responded that “raw milk, like all other food on the planet, offers no safety guarantees. It might kill pathogens; it might not kill pathogens…. Each pathogen…behaves differently in raw milk: some populations die-off over time, some grow for awhile then die off, some show no growth or death when put in raw milk. Temperature is also important; most pathogens will grow in raw milk left out on the counter at room temperature; Listeria may die.&#8221;</p>
<p>And what do we think? That ALL food carries risk, whether pasteurized or unpasteurized, organically grown or industrially grown. Raw milk can be provided, sold, and consumed as safely as hamburger — many would argue <em>more</em> safely. However, groups like the WAPF do no one a service by minimizing the very real risks. Consumers who want to be able to buy raw milk should be able to do so, just as they can choose to cook their farm-raised, grass-fed hamburger bloody if they like. (For now: many would like to see our entire meat supply irradiated in the name of consumer safety.)</p>
<p>With all of the threats of lawsuits flying around, we asked Rose if she has secured representation. “It’s really too soon for that. However, we do have a club, Raw Milk Sue-age,&#8221; she joked. &#8220;The way this is going, we may offer t-shirts on Café Press.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/10/30/raw-milk-shake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/10/30/raw-milk-shake/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The “hourglass” problem of getting small-farm Vermont meat to Vermont consumers</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ethicurean/digest/~3/6ep3aR0Ay9E/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/10/30/vermont-meat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethicurean</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digest]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Meat & poultry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/10/30/vermont-meat/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Freedom and Unity&#8221; for sustainable meat!: Kudos to reporter Kathryn Flagg and the Addison Independent for their two-part series on slaughterhouses in Vermont. Part II looks at the growing market for local meats, the challenges facing small meat producers, and the ways farmers are trying to make meat production more profitable. Money quote, in light [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;Freedom and Unity&#8221; for sustainable meat!:</strong> Kudos to reporter Kathryn Flagg and the Addison Independent for their two-part series on slaughterhouses in Vermont. Part II looks at the growing market for local meats, the challenges facing small meat producers, and the ways farmers are trying to make meat production more profitable. Money quote, in light of <a href="http://www.hsus.org/farm/news/ournews/veal_investigation_103009.html">HSUS exposé</a> on Vermont veal slaughterhouse abuse: one local butcher &#8220;thinks on-farm slaughter is best for the animals. He said he can see a difference in the color of the meat that comes from an animal slaughtered on the farm, something he chalks up to the lack of adrenaline in animals slaughtered in the normal surroundings.&#8221; A movement is under way to relax restrictions on on-farm slaughter and retail sales.  (<a href="http://addisonindependent.com/200910fingers-bone-demand-local-meat-grows-processors-feel-crunch">Addison County Independent</a>)</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=ec0cf5ba-e418-8b74-ac04-bc02dc3663d0" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/10/30/vermont-meat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/10/30/vermont-meat/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill and Nicolette Hahn Niman on why they mourn a dead cow</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ethicurean/digest/~3/bsQJpALmbI0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/10/30/niman-cow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethicurean</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digest]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Meat & poultry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/10/30/niman-cow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All about Eve: Moving piece by sustainable meat&#8217;s power couple on why they cried when they found the daughter of one of their favorite cows unexpectedly dead. &#8220;After all, this cow was being raised for meat. How could we feel a genuine attachment for her?&#8221; they ask. &#8220;We can only say that we did. And [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>All about Eve:</strong> Moving piece by sustainable meat&#8217;s power couple on why they cried when they found the daughter of one of their favorite cows unexpectedly dead. &#8220;After all, this cow was being raised for meat. How could we feel a genuine attachment for her?&#8221; they ask. &#8220;We can only say that we did. And that we think the world would be a better place if all farm animals were cared for by people who feel true sorrow when one dies prematurely. The way we felt for Eve is similar to the way many family farmers we know regard their animals. On just about every traditional farm or ranch we&#8217;ve visited there&#8217;s an old steer or cow or an aging sow or an ancient turkey tom, animals that are long past their good breeding years. They&#8217;re still there because something about them set them apart and the farmers just can&#8217;t bring themselves to send them to the slaughterhouse.&#8221; (<a href="http://food.theatlantic.com/on-the-farm/life-and-death-on-the-ranch.php">The Atlantic Food Channel</a>)</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=83a859ca-5f67-898b-81fe-296e0e8baaac" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/10/30/niman-cow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/10/30/niman-cow/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Why slaughterhouses should be open to the public</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ethicurean/digest/~3/lTNnTGLg1N8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/10/30/veal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ethicurean</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digest]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Slaughter]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[veal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/10/30/veal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why slaughterhouses should be open to the public: USDA and the Vermont Agency of Agriculture have suspended operations at the Bushway Packing plant in Grand Isle, VT, a facility that processes veal calves, pending a continuing investigation based on abuses uncovered by the Humane Society. Videotape from HSUS&#8217;s undercover investigation showed workers kicking, slapping, shocking, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why slaughterhouses should be open to the public:</strong> USDA and the Vermont Agency of Agriculture have suspended operations at the Bushway Packing plant in Grand Isle, VT, a facility that processes veal calves, pending a continuing investigation based on abuses uncovered by the Humane Society. Videotape from HSUS&#8217;s undercover investigation showed workers kicking, slapping, shocking, and in one case skinning alive veal calves only a few days old, many of whom were unable to stand or walk on their own.  (<a href="http://www.hsus.org/farm/news/ournews/veal_investigation_103009.html">HSUS</a>) <i>Opinionating:</i> Many otherwise dedicated carnivores refuse to eat veal for its inhumane practices. However, veal is an inescapable byproduct of the dairy industry: male calves not eaten for meat are ground up for pet food. All those who eat meat and dairy — yes, pipe down, you vegans waiting to pounce in the comments section — have an obligation to see that these young animals too get to enjoy a humane if short life and die with dignity and minimal suffering. And the more squeamish we are about refusing to even look at what goes on in these painful areas of the meat industry, the more cover we give to horrible abuses like the ones at Bushway.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=fce6f107-d856-83f2-ac2a-9010b86d8d24" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/10/30/veal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/10/30/veal/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
