<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>eXponential Trader</title>
	<link>http://www.exponentialtrader.com</link>
	<description>Not another market blog. Offering concise, helplful, strategic info.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/exponentialtrader/rss" /><feedburner:info uri="exponentialtrader/rss" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>exponentialtrader/rss</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Superbowl XLII Bets</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/exponentialtrader/rss/~3/I60mFr-oGik/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2008020340/superbowl-xlii-bets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Czaszynski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2008020340/superbowl-xlii-bets/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heres my bet for the Superbowl.

The trend for the playoffs has been that the spread usually was covered by the underdog, and thats what my previous bets have capitalized on. I&#8217;ve been 5 for 5 recently. To make it 6 for 6 I&#8217;m changing it up a little. I&#8217;m picking the favourite, and also predicting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heres my bet for the Superbowl.<br />
<a href="http://www.exponentialtrader.com/tradeimages/Superbowl_42.JPG"><img width="100%" src="http://www.exponentialtrader.com/tradeimages/Superbowl_42.JPG"></a></p>
<p>The trend for the playoffs has been that the spread usually was covered by the underdog, and thats what my previous bets have capitalized on. I&#8217;ve been 5 for 5 recently. To make it 6 for 6 I&#8217;m changing it up a little. I&#8217;m picking the favourite, and also predicting a high scoring game. </p>
<p>Some interesting stats</p>
<p><b> Patriots average point total from 2007 NFL Season and playoffs: 35.6 </b></p>
<p><b> Average points Patriots won by from 2007 Season and playoffs: 18.6 </b></p>
<p><b> Week 17 Game New England Vs. Giants point total: 73 </b></p>
<p>On top of that superbowl games tend to have higher scores since everyone goes the extra mile and since the pressure is on, so more reason to think the spread will be covered.</p>
<p>Screenshot of my playoff history<br />
<img width="100%" src="http://www.exponentialtrader.com/tradeimages/previous_bets.JPG"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2008020340/superbowl-xlii-bets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2008020340/superbowl-xlii-bets/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Picks for the Weekend</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/exponentialtrader/rss/~3/Ecc0r-GFFz0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007110338/picks-for-the-weekend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Czaszynski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007110338/picks-for-the-weekend/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s see how this one will work out. This is test #3, the other two times we did this we made a profit. 
0==== Parlay: 71 &#124; UNKNOWN RESULT
Winning Combo: &#8212;- &#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;- Parlay Result: 0
80 V &#124;2007-11-03 13:15:00: LVP @ BLA - Visitor - 2.00
73 T &#124;2007-11-03 11:00:00: BIR @ EVN - Tie - [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see how this one will work out. This is test #3, the other two times we did this we made a profit. </p>
<p>0==== Parlay: 71 | UNKNOWN RESULT<br />
Winning Combo: &#8212;- &#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;- Parlay Result: 0<br />
80 V |2007-11-03 13:15:00: LVP @ BLA - Visitor - 2.00<br />
73 T |2007-11-03 11:00:00: BIR @ EVN - Tie - 3.60<br />
20 H |2007-11-03 12:00:00: NCST @ MMFL - Home - 1.20<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-Parlays Correct 2.22222222222&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;Real Odd winner: 8.954&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;Average Winning Odds: 17.0740469529&#8212;&#8212; Parlayis: 20H,73T,80V<br />
Total Odds = 8.64 </p>
<p>0==== Parlay: 33 | UNKNOWN RESULT<br />
Winning Combo: &#8212;- &#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;- Parlay Result: 0<br />
23 T |2007-11-03 12:00:00: WKFR @ VIRG - Tie - 2.80<br />
80 V |2007-11-03 13:15:00: LVP @ BLA - Visitor - 2.00<br />
85 H |2007-11-03 15:00:00: LORI @ MAR - Home - 1.65<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-Parlays Correct 0&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;Real Odd winner: 45.144&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;Average Winning Odds: 27.1284022587&#8212;&#8212; Parlayis: 23T,80V,85H<br />
Total Odds = 9.24 </p>
<p>0==== Parlay: 91 | UNKNOWN RESULT<br />
Winning Combo: &#8212;- &#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;- Parlay Result: 0<br />
18 H |2007-11-03 14:30:00: NAVY @ NTDM - Home - 1.90<br />
19 T |2007-11-03 12:00:00: IOWA @ NRWN - Tie - 2.80<br />
83 H |2007-11-03 15:00:00: SOCH @ NICE - Home - 1.80<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-Parlays Correct 3.44827586207&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;Real Odd winner: 4.455&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;Average Winning Odds: 16.0701180877&#8212;&#8212; Parlayis: 18H,19T,83H<br />
Total Odds = 9.576 </p>
<p>==== Parlay: 3 | UNKNOWN RESULT<br />
Winning Combo: &#8212;- &#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;- Parlay Result: 0<br />
19 V |2007-11-03 15:30:00: MCHG @ MCST - Visitor - 1.80<br />
29 V |2007-11-03 15:30:00: TEX @ OKST - Visitor - 1.90<br />
89 T |2007-11-03 17:00:00: RMAD @ FCSE - Tie - 2.80<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-Parlays Correct 0&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;Real Odd winner: 5.984&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;Average Winning Odds: 5.984&#8212;&#8212; Parlayis: 19V,29V,89T<br />
Total Odds = 9.576 </p>
<p>0==== Parlay: 54 | UNKNOWN RESULT<br />
Winning Combo: &#8212;- &#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;- Parlay Result: 0<br />
57 V |2007-11-03 19:00:00: JOKI @ ESTA - Visitor - 2.20<br />
34 H |2007-11-03 18:30:00: MSRI @ COL - Home - 3.00<br />
21 V |2007-11-03 17:00:00: LSU @ ALAB - Visitor - 1.40<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-Parlays Correct 12.1951219512&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;Real Odd winner: 7.48&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;Average Winning Odds: 13.034022176&#8212;&#8212; Parlayis: 21V,34H,57V<br />
Total Odds = 9.24 </p>
<p>0==== Parlay: 4 | UNKNOWN RESULT<br />
Winning Combo: &#8212;- &#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;- Parlay Result: 0<br />
33 V |2007-11-03 18:30:00: WAS @ STFD - Visitor - 1.90<br />
58 H |2007-11-03 19:30:00: ATL @ TB - Home - 1.30<br />
38 V |2007-11-03 20:00:00: FLST @ BSTC - Visitor - 4.00<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-Parlays Correct 0&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;Real Odd winner: 9.504&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;Average Winning Odds: 9&#8212;&#8212; Parlayis: 33V,38V,58H<br />
Total Odds = 9.88 </p>
<p>0==== Parlay: 88 | UNKNOWN RESULT<br />
Winning Combo: &#8212;- &#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;- Parlay Result: 0<br />
59 H |2007-11-03 19:30:00: KVCH @ LECA - Home - 1.80<br />
17 V |2007-11-03 19:00:00: EDM @ HAM - Visitor - 2.30<br />
64 H |2007-11-03 22:00:00: ANA @ PHX - Home - 2.10<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-Parlays Correct 3.50877192982&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;Real Odd winner: 26.88&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;Average Winning Odds: 16.2955489496&#8212;&#8212; Parlayis: 17V,59H,64H<br />
Total Odds = 8.694 </p>
<p>0==== Parlay: 58 | UNKNOWN RESULT<br />
Winning Combo: &#8212;- &#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;- Parlay Result: 0<br />
94 H |2007-11-04 09:00:00: SIE @ PAR - Home - 1.85<br />
4 H |2007-11-04 12:00:00: CAR @ TEN - Home - 1.80<br />
3 V |2007-11-04 12:00:00: ARZ @ TB - Visitor - 2.80<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-Parlays Correct 7.89473684211&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;Real Odd winner: 16.632&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;Average Winning Odds: 13.7941097148&#8212;&#8212; Parlayis: 3V,4H,94H<br />
Total Odds = 9.324</p>
<p>0==== Parlay: 45 | UNKNOWN RESULT<br />
Winning Combo: &#8212;- &#8212;&#8211; &#8212;&#8212;- Parlay Result: 0<br />
97 H |2007-11-04 11:00:00: BLT @ WHU - Home - 1.60<br />
2 T |2007-11-04 12:00:00: GB @ KC - Tie - 2.80<br />
7 H |2007-11-04 12:00:00: DEN @ DET - Home - 1.90<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-Parlays Correct 10&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;Average Winning Odds: 13.1361281305&#8212;&#8212; Parlayis: 2T,7H,97H<br />
Total Odds = 8.512</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007110338/picks-for-the-weekend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007110338/picks-for-the-weekend/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Data Analysis of many parlays</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/exponentialtrader/rss/~3/jQzVXnGu6XA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007110337/data-analysis-of-many-parlays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 08:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Czaszynski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007110337/data-analysis-of-many-parlays/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;m still working on my script that takes a list of sports action games and makes parlays. Heres an example..
Click here to see the output
After running through hundreds of parlays&#8230;For parlays of 3 games with 1/13 odds
Average Winning Odds: 12.57
# Parlays Correct with 1/13 odds: 5.16% (as compared to 100%/13 = 7.69%)
When running same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m still working on my script that takes a list of sports action games and makes parlays. Heres an example..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.exponentialtrader.com/scraper_script.htm">Click here to see the output</a></p>
<p>After running through hundreds of parlays&#8230;For parlays of 3 games with 1/13 odds</p>
<p><b>Average Winning Odds</b>: 12.57<br />
<b># Parlays Correct with 1/13 odds</b>: 5.16% (as compared to 100%/13 = 7.69%)</p>
<p>When running same script with 1/9 odds<br />
<b> Average Winning Odds </b>: 12.19 (same as before and makes sense why)<br />
<b># Parlays Correct with 1/9 odds</b>: 4.92%, 5.83% (as compared to 100%/9 = 11.11%) </p>
<p>So there is a range that maximizes your odds of winning, still needing to find it more precisely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007110337/data-analysis-of-many-parlays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007110337/data-analysis-of-many-parlays/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>My Method Worked Again</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/exponentialtrader/rss/~3/TTySxi8zrF8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007102135/my-method-worked-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 10:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Czaszynski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007102135/my-method-worked-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fourth parlay used:
New Mexico v San Diego State - Straight up New Mexico 1.267
Minnesota Wild v St Louis Blues - Minesota Wild -1.5 - 3.2
Colorado State v UNLV - Colorado State straight up 2.25
Results
16:30 	Oct 20, 2007 	New Mexico 	20 	 - 	17 	San Diego State
16:35 	Oct 20, 2007 	Minnesota Wild 	3 	 - [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fourth parlay used:</p>
<p>New Mexico v San Diego State - Straight up New Mexico 1.267<br />
Minnesota Wild v St Louis Blues - Minesota Wild -1.5 - 3.2<br />
Colorado State v UNLV - Colorado State straight up 2.25</p>
<p>Results<br />
16:30 	Oct 20, 2007 	New Mexico 	20 	 - 	17 	San Diego State<br />
16:35 	Oct 20, 2007 	Minnesota Wild 	3 	 - 	1 	St Louis Blues<br />
17:00 	Oct 20, 2007 	Colorado State 	48 	 - 	23 	UNLV</p>
<p>So again the method worked! </p>
<p>Say you would of bet $100 on each parlay, it would of taken you 4 parlays</p>
<p>- 4 x $100 Parlays<br />
+ 1 win of $100 x 9.12 = $912<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
+$512 profit</p>
<p>Thats a 128% profit&#8230; Too bad I didn&#8217;t bet cause of the stupid credit card.</p>
<p>Ok so I just showed you guys a highly profitable method, 2 weeks in a row so far. Should I be giving out this for free?? I&#8217;m also happy that these worked on a different type of system other than standard oddset I&#8217;ve been using before.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m working on some new method, that if I&#8217;m correct will be unbelievable results&#8230; Really excited about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007102135/my-method-worked-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007102135/my-method-worked-again/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Testing out the Czasz Method real life</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/exponentialtrader/rss/~3/4e13fV1A_qA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007102034/testing-out-the-czasz-method-real-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Czaszynski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007102034/testing-out-the-czasz-method-real-life/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got my wisdom teeth pulled out yesterday, one of the worst experiences in my life. So I&#8217;m in bed bored and wanting to finally use my method this time. Instead of doing it at the local BCLC retailer I&#8217;ll be use Intertops, an online sportsbook.
So here are my random picks, all that will have 1/9 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got my wisdom teeth pulled out yesterday, one of the worst experiences in my life. So I&#8217;m in bed bored and wanting to finally use my method this time. Instead of doing it at the local BCLC retailer I&#8217;ll be use Intertops, an online sportsbook.</p>
<p>So here are my random picks, all that will have 1/9 +10% odds and none overlap, and all happen at different times.</p>
<p>Before: 12:00<br />
Wake Forest Vs. Navy - Straight Up Navy 2.3<br />
Wyomig Vs. Air Froce - Straight up Wyomig<br />
Texas A&#038;M Vs. Nebraska - Straight up Nebraska 1.769</p>
<p>Before 14:00<br />
South Africa v England  South Africa -8.5<br />
Toronto Argonauts v Montreal Alouettes - Montreal Alhoutes 1 - 1.909<br />
Texas Tech v <a href="http://www.carinsurancerates.com">Missouri</a> - Straight up Texas Tech</p>
<p>Before 16:30<br />
Chicago Blackhawks v Toronto Maple Leafs - Blackhawks +1.5 - 1.625<br />
Kansas State v Oklahoma State - Kansas State Straight up 2.15<br />
Kansas v Colorado - Straight up Colorado 2.45<br />
Florida Intl v UL Monroe - Un Monroe Straight up 1.154</p>
<p>Before 19:30<br />
New Mexico v San Diego State - Straight up New Mexico 1.267<br />
Minnesota Wild v St Louis Blues - Minesota Wild -1.5 - 3.2<br />
Colorado State v UNLV - Colorado State straight up 2.25</p>
<p>Before Sunday at 12:00<br />
Atlanta Falcons v New Orleans Saints - Straight up New Orleans Saints 1.22<br />
Baltimore Ravens v Buffalo Bills - Straight up Baltimore Ravens 1.606<br />
San Francisco 49ers v New York Giants - Straight up New York Giants 1.2<br />
Tampa Bay Buccaneers v Detroit Lions - Game Total under 44.5 1.909<br />
Tampa Bay Buccaneers v Detroit Lions - Straight up Tamba Bay Bucaneers</p>
<p>Before 15:00<br />
Minnesota Vikings v Dallas Cowboys - Dallas cowboys -9.5 - 1.952<br />
New York Jets v Cincinnati Bengals - Straight up New York Jets 3.4<br />
Chicago Bears v Philadelphia Eagles - Straight up Phily 1.4</p>
<p>Before 18:00<br />
Pittsburgh Steelers v Denver Broncos - Pittsburgh Steelers -3.5 - 1.87<br />
Indianapolis Colts v Jacksonville Jaguars - Game total over 44.5- 1.909<br />
Indianapolis Colts v Jacksonville Jaguars -  Straight up Jacksonville Jags</p>
<p>Thats 7 parlays, will post next 2 when available.</p>
<p>BAHHH - Tried actually doing this in real life but I just activated my credit card, and I couldn&#8217;t insert funds online for some reason&#8230; I&#8217;ll have to sort that out and I&#8217;ll just run this one as a test and see what happens. Probably better that we do a trial run anways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007102034/testing-out-the-czasz-method-real-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007102034/testing-out-the-czasz-method-real-life/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Sonic</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/exponentialtrader/rss/~3/IP_L1fR4SS0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/trades/2007101533/sonic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Czaszynski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Trades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exponentialtrader.com/trades/2007101533/sonic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
First bought it at 24.72 but it had it&#8217;s stop order triggered 24.53. Feeling confident in it and unhappy about the loss I got in again at 24.65 and sold at 25.00 
Overall I didn&#8217;t gain any or loose anything because of cost per couple trades.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.exponentialtrader.com/tradeimages/Sonic.JPG" alt="sonic burgers"><br />
First bought it at 24.72 but it had it&#8217;s stop order triggered 24.53. Feeling confident in it and unhappy about the loss I got in again at 24.65 and sold at 25.00 </p>
<p>Overall I didn&#8217;t gain any or loose anything because of cost per couple trades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/trades/2007101533/sonic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/trades/2007101533/sonic/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Results are official - Other ramblings</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/exponentialtrader/rss/~3/JyVIKq1lovk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/other/2007101432/results-are-official-other-ramblings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Czaszynski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exponentialtrader.com/other/2007101432/results-are-official-other-ramblings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can check out the official results from the experiment here, menu 1244 https://playnow.bclc.com/BCCF/forwardResultsODST.do
I found this SNL skit that aired this weekend really funny.




 Can&#8217;t get the music out of my head.
Other than that I got a review copy of Timothy Sykes book; An American Hedge Fund straight from the man himself. Around 250 pages [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can check out the official results from the experiment here, menu 1244 <a href="https://playnow.bclc.com/BCCF/forwardResultsODST.do">https://playnow.bclc.com/BCCF/forwardResultsODST.do</a></p>
<p>I found this SNL skit that aired this weekend really funny.<br />
<object width="425" height="350">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WxIEjZUw8yg"></param>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WxIEjZUw8yg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<p> Can&#8217;t get the music out of my head.</p>
<p>Other than that I got a review copy of <b>Timothy Sykes book; An American Hedge Fund</b> straight from the man himself. Around 250 pages so I should be done it fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/other/2007101432/results-are-official-other-ramblings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/other/2007101432/results-are-official-other-ramblings/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Unofficial results - This time it’s a great success! 107.5% PROFIT in 1 day</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/exponentialtrader/rss/~3/PtYjKNvNPSs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007101431/unofficial-results-this-time-its-a-great-success-1075-profit-in-1-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Czaszynski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007101431/unofficial-results-this-time-its-a-great-success-1075-profit-in-1-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Correct Parlays 
90 T CORRECT, 92 V CORRECT, 99V CORRECT  Odds 1/8.30
94 V CORRECT, 95 H CORRECT, 97 H CORRECT Odds 1/8.78
Two of the parlays won. And neither one of them were the 9th trial. It was the 4th and 6th parlay (just like expected it&#8217;d be near middle)
So time for some math. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b> Correct Parlays </b><br />
90 T CORRECT, 92 V CORRECT, 99V CORRECT  Odds 1/8.30<br />
94 V CORRECT, 95 H CORRECT, 97 H CORRECT Odds 1/8.78</p>
<p>Two of the parlays won. And neither one of them were the 9th trial. It was the 4th and 6th parlay (just like expected it&#8217;d be near middle)</p>
<p>So time for some math. </p>
<p>Assuming you did $10 on each parlay ticket, you would of spent $40 and made $83.00 for a net profit of $43. (107.5% profit)<br />
Then if you spent $60 you would of made $83.00 + $87.80 = $171  minus $60 = $111 (+185% profit)</p>
<p>This is huge. I picked every parlay RANDOMLY with no intuition, I just made sure the odds add up to my desired number. With the stock market you can make 1-5% on average lets say a day. Here you made 107% profit with this experiment.</p>
<p>Time to check it&#8217;s reproducibility over the next few trials so we don&#8217;t get too happy too fast <img src='http://www.exponentialtrader.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007101431/unofficial-results-this-time-its-a-great-success-1075-profit-in-1-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007101431/unofficial-results-this-time-its-a-great-success-1075-profit-in-1-day/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Experiment Round 2 - changing the approach a little</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/exponentialtrader/rss/~3/Jj7LEsiu82A/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007101330/experiment-round-2-changing-the-approach-a-little/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 05:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Czaszynski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007101330/experiment-round-2-changing-the-approach-a-little/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is in follow up to my previous post found here.
Ok so it&#8217;s Week 6 of the NFL and time for me to do another experiment. By using last week&#8217;s results where none of the 10, 1-to-10 odd parlays won, I&#8217;ll try to figure out reasons why it didn&#8217;t work.
The best reason I can think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in follow up to my previous post <a href="http://www.exponentialtrader.com/mad-money/2007100625/czasz-method-examining-a-gambling-method-to-reap-in-profits-or-break-even/">found here</a>.</p>
<p>Ok so it&#8217;s Week 6 of the NFL and time for me to do another experiment. By using last week&#8217;s results where none of the 10, 1-to-10 odd parlays won, I&#8217;ll try to figure out reasons why it didn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>The best reason I can think of it not working is a little hard to explain. The parlay odds all were 1/10, but the average odds were 1/2.157 per winning game pick. So using the parlays that had 3 games, it would equal exactly 1 in 10.04 odd just like I picked for the week (and it should have REALLY WORKED). But looking at the week before that (week 4) the average odds were 1/2.67 which with three games would give an overall 1/19.0 odds. 19.0 is just (2.67)^3. So this average odd per game changes by a considerable amount each week and can&#8217;t be predicted ahead of time for any advantage.</p>
<p>I thought about point spread as the approach, but the house really takes over since if you pick two games each with 1/2 odds you&#8217;ll only get 1/2 overall instead of 1/4. Then on 3 games you get 1/4, 4=> 1/8, 5=> 1/15, 6=>1/25 and so on.. </p>
<p>So it lead me to thinking how the parlays all shared games with other ones. It meant 1 loosing game affects 1 to about 4 parlays. This is a real problem. So for this week, the parlays will not rely on each other (just last 2 since not enough games to pick on this Sunday and I had to include other sporting events outside than NFL). </p>
<p><img src="http://www.exponentialtrader.com/tradeimages/week6.JPG" alt="week 6 sporting picks"><br />
Taken from <a href="https://playnow.bclc.com/BCCF/forwardODST.do">https://playnow.bclc.com/BCCF/forwardODST.do</a></p>
<p><b>Using 1/9 odds with +- 10% </b><br />
84 T, 85 V  <u>Odds 1/9</u><br />
86 H, 87 T, 89 H  <u>Odds 1/9.49</u><br />
88 V, 91 H   <u>Odds 1/9</u><br />
90 T, 92 V, 99V  <u>Odds 1/8.30</u><br />
93 T, 98 H <u>Odds 1/8.20</u><br />
94 V, 95 H, 97 H <u>Odds 1/8.78</u><br />
96 H, 100 T <u>Odds 1/9</u><br />
91 H, 97 H, 100 H, 101 V <u>Odds 1/9.30</u> (shared games)<br />
Control Group: 88 H, 90 V, 96T <u>Odds 1/8.87</u> (shared games) </p>
<p>I won&#8217;t actually wager this time around. Also pretend we&#8217;re doing each parlay 1 week at a time (just like explained in the post where once you win you take your winnings and walk away and not do the rest of the parlays since it&#8217;s unconventional)</p>
<p>Will follow up on this once results are out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007101330/experiment-round-2-changing-the-approach-a-little/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/gambling/2007101330/experiment-round-2-changing-the-approach-a-little/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Timothy Sykes - turned 12k into 2mill</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/exponentialtrader/rss/~3/ulpHORVDzak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/books/2007101129/timothy-sykes-turned-12k-into-2mill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Czaszynski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exponentialtrader.com/mad-money/2007101129/timothy-sykes-turned-12k-into-2mill/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

There&#8217;s a lot of talk going around blogs about Timothy Sykes new book &#8220;An American Hedge Fund: How I Made $2 Million as a Stock Operator &#038; Created a Hedge Fund&#8221;
This guy is just like me, started off with same amount of money but only turned it into 2 million by the time he was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tr>
<td>There&#8217;s a lot of talk going around blogs about Timothy Sykes new book &#8220;<b>An American Hedge Fund: How I Made $2 Million as a Stock Operator &#038; Created a Hedge Fund</b>&#8221;</p>
<p>This guy is just like me, started off with same amount of money but only turned it into 2 million by the time he was 22 <img src='http://www.exponentialtrader.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Going to give this one a read. </td>
<td><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=christmasgi07-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as1&#038;asins=0979549701&#038;fc1=000000&#038;IS2=1&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;lc1=0000FF&#038;bc1=FFFFFF&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe></td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/books/2007101129/timothy-sykes-turned-12k-into-2mill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.exponentialtrader.com/books/2007101129/timothy-sykes-turned-12k-into-2mill/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
