<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>eyetag's weblog project</title>
	
	<link>http://blog.eyetag.de</link>
	<description>tagging your eyes, um, occassionally ;)</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/eyetagsweblogproject" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="eyetagsweblogproject" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/</creativeCommons:license><item>
		<title>IPTV Benchmark the 3rd: The Future of Broadband Video</title>
		<link>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/iptv-benchmark-the-3rd-the-future-of-broadband-video/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/iptv-benchmark-the-3rd-the-future-of-broadband-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikolaus Reinelt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Motionpicture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/134/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This years edition of IPTV Benchmark Study: The Future of Broadband Video is about to be published.

Congrats to the colleagues of thebrainbehind. It&#8217;s an comprehensive update to IPTV Benchmark Study. This years edition was again published in cooperation with Nokia Siemens networks and is assesing relevant IPTV rollouts around the globe as well as a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">This years edition of <a href="http://www.thebrainbehind.de/research/studies/global-iptv-benchmarks-the-future-of-broadband-video.html" target="_blank"><span class="internal-link">IPTV Benchmark Study: The Future of Broadband Video</span></a> is about to be published.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.eyetag.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/study3_cover.jpg" target="_self"><img class="size-full wp-image-183 aligncenter" title="study3_cover_small" src="http://blog.eyetag.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/study3_cover_small.jpg" alt="" width="106" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>Congrats to the colleagues of thebrainbehind. It&#8217;s an comprehensive update to <a href="http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/grassroots-thrive-on-digital-platforms/" target="top">IPTV Benchmark Study</a>. This years edition was again published in cooperation with Nokia Siemens networks and is assesing relevant IPTV rollouts around the globe as well as a number of the most interesting video streaming websites. In both cases business models have been analysed in terms of product offer, ease of use and the range of content that is available as well as the usability of the services.</p>
<p>The following chapters have been contributed by eyetag media engineers network</p>
<ul>
<li>WebTV: Reassessing Potential for Value Creation</li>
<li>Top-tier type of content:<br />
Positioning in a platform driven environment</li>
<li>Second-tier type of content:<br />
Growing maturity for business designs</li>
<li>Independent, Niche and Prosumer content:<br />
Platforms coming of age</li>
</ul>
<p>Following up some snippets out of it:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">WebTV: Reassessing Potential for Value Creation</span></p>
<p>It took no longer than a bat of an eyelid to change the arena of web entertainment forever. Yet, despite all large and small moves by industry majors, there is still a staggering amount of trial and error going on. But with content owners embracing the opportunities arising from a growing focus on relationship-driven business, a number of underlying strategic trends can be observed.<br />
Again, this year saw transactions from investors towards online video services and software companies of $461m in the pioneering market for the industry, the US (Dow Jones VentureSource). In web video, growth is expected to triple by 2011, as can be seen in the diagram below.</p>
<p>[chart removed]<br />
Despite video ads being a relatively new form of advertising, they generated revenues of about $1bn last year in the US alone. It will increase to $2.9 billion by 2011 at an average annual growth rate of 48%, according to Strategy Analytics. As such it will be the growth factor No 1 for the segment. Worldwide and for all online video business models researcher InStat predicts a growth from $1.2 billion in 2007 to $4.5 billion in 2012 (CAGR at 39%).</p>
<p>In the meantime social web, still a major factor for internet usage of geek dimensions (and WebTV’s ‘structural complementor’), will capture some $3.8billion until 2011 in advertising.</p>
<p>The tremendous uptake of pull media is also shown in that more than a third of all US TV households are forecast to subscribe to or regularly use VoD on various platforms by 2011 (Informa), generating revenues of more than $11.4 billion.<br />
But besides all this progress being made on networked media, one should not forget that DVD usage is a well embedded habit. DVDs have been used by consumers for years. And to most the format is just perfect. This behaviour will only change gradually, usecase by usecase. Plus, despite the raw numbers of growth and usage, social networks are still trying to come up with successful ad models. It will certainly remain a key question in coming years how profits can be made from the massive amount of users’ time spent on MySpace, Facebook and Co.<br />
As the following ranking of online properties in the US suggests, traditional media is still lagging behind the internet world’s incumbents.</p>
<p>Another aspect, the widespread fear of converting analog dollars into digital pennies, has some considerable truth in it. As Will Richnond of the TDG Group stated recently as an example, NBC would earn a loss in value of up to 80% for one episode of ‘Heroes’ placed on hulu.com, instead of pouring it out via their network outlets. This might even be higher, if sales fail to harvest a double CPM for the piece.</p>
<p>On the other hand such assumptions only become reality if conversion from push to pull media would evidently cause linear loss on traditional outlets. Except for younger audiences, which may never have been as connected as the old measurement model was suggesting, the decay remains yet hard to prove. And of course broadcasters here are great in proving the strength and vitality of connectedness with their audiences. Efforts to establish an integrated measurement system for the multi-screen landscape suggest that many players are hoping for more transparency on such questions soon.<br />
Summarising trends, it can be noted that an increasingly mature pull media is now a cornerstone in strategic decision-making. Video works as driving force behind the internet’s popularity and, accordingly, for advertising revenue growth and migration.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p><!--[if !mso]> <mce :style>< !<br />
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}<br />
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}<br />
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}<br />
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}<br />
--> <!--[endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w :WordDocument> </w><w :View>Normal</w> <w :Zoom>0</w> <w :TrackMoves /> <w :TrackFormatting /> <w :HyphenationZone>21</w> <w :PunctuationKerning /> <w :ValidateAgainstSchemas /> <w :SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w> <w :IgnoreMixedContent>false</w> <w :AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w> <w :DoNotPromoteQF /> <w :LidThemeOther>DE</w> <w :LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w> <w :LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w> <w :Compatibility> <w :BreakWrappedTables /> <w :SnapToGridInCell /> <w :WrapTextWithPunct /> <w :UseAsianBreakRules /> <w :DontGrowAutofit /> <w :SplitPgBreakAndParaMark /> <w :DontVertAlignCellWithSp /> <w :DontBreakConstrainedForcedTables /> <w :DontVertAlignInTxbx /> <w :Word11KerningPairs /> <w :CachedColBalance /> </w> <w :BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w> <m :mathPr> <m :mathFont m:val="Cambria Math" /> <m :brkBin m:val="before" /> <m :brkBinSub m:val="&#45;-" /> <m :smallFrac m:val="off" /> <m :dispDef /> <m :lMargin m:val="0" /> <m :rMargin m:val="0" /> <m :defJc m:val="centerGroup" /> <m :wrapIndent m:val="1440" /> <m :intLim m:val="subSup" /> <m :naryLim m:val="undOvr" /> </m> </xml>< ![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w :LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true"   DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"   LatentStyleCount="267"> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography" /> <w :LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading" /> </w> </xml>< ![endif]--><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Independent, Niche and Prosumer content:<br />
Platforms coming of age</span></p>
<p>This class still counts for the largest amount of content deployed throughout the web.<br />
It is these new platforms that are putting enormous disruptive pressure on traditional content owners. In an ongoing “tsunami of self expression” (New York Times), people are looking for ways to share their life and to draw attention to themselves. One of the most striking figures is without doubt the 10 hours of video being uploaded to Youtube every minute.<br />
The following chart underlines the stellar advance of Youtube in this domain.</p>
<div id="attachment_186" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 460px"><a href="http://blog.eyetag.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/chart5.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-186" title="chart5_top10sites" src="http://blog.eyetag.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/chart5.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="340" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Top 10 Video and Multimedia Websites (US), Source: Hitwise marketingcharts.com</p></div>
<p style="text-align: left;">Myspace is expected to generate $1bn this fiscal year (ending June 2009). WebTV platform provider Brightcove has closed deals with hundreds of independent content owners and is reaching out to attain a global presence with their increasingly mature SaaS services.<br />
Mainstream media’s alignment to aggregation platforms is of course a primary measure for meeting fragmentation tendencies. As content opportunities proliferate, capabilities in connecting audiences with highly relevant contents will become a source of growth, even if this leads users outside the former product’s boundaries. The task must be to absorb the consumer’s involvement and to create complementary assets around it. Mashups of user generated content are one way of achieving this. Hulu, for example, lets users compile their own rough edits of episodes of their favourite shows. In addition, Youtube has just recently launched an annotation tool where users can add notes and comments to videos. Not long ago, these features could only be found on specialised platforms features list - another indicator for the growing maturity of the segment.<br />
By introducing more and more of such features, prosumer communities and independent fan bases are changing not only entertainment from bottom-up, but brand communication as a whole. Whereas top-tier contents are attracting users in the first place and second-tier contents are setting the pace for community engagement, prosumer and other highly vertical platforms will continue to drive buzz and lead to a real pervasiveness of the magic of a video enhanced web 2.0.
</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p></mce></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/iptv-benchmark-the-3rd-the-future-of-broadband-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web 2.0 Expo Europe</title>
		<link>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/interactive/web-2-expo-europe/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/interactive/web-2-expo-europe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikolaus Reinelt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Generation: X]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/web-2-expo-europe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web 2.0 Expo European Edition has just ended. See here for a stash of some interesting presentations. Some very interesting ones there, as insights to SaaS/cloud computing of salesforce.com. I wouldn&#8217;t had estimated that time for setting up a comparable webservice on SaaS has a factor of 40 between a promotion platform set up on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.oreilly.com/webexberlin2008/" target="_blank">Web 2.0 Expo European Edition</a> has just ended. See here for a <a href="http://en.oreilly.com/webexberlin2008/public/schedule/proceedings" target="_blank">stash of some interesting presentations</a>. Some very interesting ones there, as insights to SaaS/cloud computing of salesforce.com. I wouldn&#8217;t had estimated that time for setting up a comparable webservice on SaaS has a factor of 40 between a promotion platform set up on .net. Another great piece of Alan Patrick is analyzing web economics and the limitations of ad-based business design.</p>
<div id="__ss_673638" style="width: 425px; text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="355" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=broadsight-oreilly-expo-1224534307551097-8&amp;stripped_title=broadsight-o-reilly-expo-presentation" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" src="http://static.slideshare.net/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=broadsight-oreilly-expo-1224534307551097-8&amp;stripped_title=broadsight-o-reilly-expo-presentation" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<div style="font-size: 11px; font-family: tahoma,arial; height: 26px">View SlideShare <a style="text-decoration:underline;" title="View Web 2.0 Expo Berlin 2008 - Limiits to FreeConomics on SlideShare" href="http://www.slideshare.net/Broadsight/broadsight-o-reilly-expo-presentation?type=powerpoint">presentation</a> or <a style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/upload?type=powerpoint">Upload</a> your own. (tags: <a style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://slideshare.net/tag/web2expoeu08">web2expoeu08</a> <a style="text-decoration:underline;" href="http://slideshare.net/tag/web2expoeu09">web2expoeu09</a>)</div>
<p>Marcel of netzwertig.com has a <a href="http://netzwertig.com/2008/10/23/web-20-expo-ueber-die-grenzen-von-freeconomics/" target="_blank">detailed discussion</a> of the speech.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/interactive/web-2-expo-europe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Context anyone?</title>
		<link>http://blog.eyetag.de/knowledge/context-anyone/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eyetag.de/knowledge/context-anyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikolaus Reinelt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Generation: X]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/context/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big shouts out to everyone!
As the cold days come by, eyetag is back on the blog. There are a few things coming up soon. First and foremost the blog will need some overdue frontend polishing and a major wordpress upgrade. I&#8217;m still figuring out to what extend i will re-design the project. But one thing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big shouts out to everyone!</p>
<p>As the cold days come by, eyetag is back on the blog. There are a few things coming up soon. First and foremost the blog will need some overdue frontend polishing and a major wordpress upgrade. I&#8217;m still figuring out to what extend i will re-design the project. But one thing is for sure: There&#8217;s enough fuel to fill the pipes. Certainly we will have some more re-blogging over here in future. Eventually one major benefit of micro media brands and blogs is this very simple function of being a repository for all kind of chunks. From information to irrigation. And sometimes you make it to create valuable context (read also <a target="_blank" href="http://bubblegeneration.com/resources/usergeneratedcontext.pdf">Umair&#8217;s noteworhy read</a> on the issue). Um, the role of context and it&#8217;s valuation/exploitation in a micro media environment. Maybe I should put up a dedicated section for this one..? Let me think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eyetag.de/knowledge/context-anyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Software als Segment</title>
		<link>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/motionpicture/social-software-als-segment/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/motionpicture/social-software-als-segment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikolaus Reinelt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Motionpicture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/social-software-als-segment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Das große Interesse an sozialen Netzwerken und Video im Internet bestätigt das hohe Potential, dass das soziale Web mit sich bringt. Andererseits lenkt es jedoch ab von dem Möglichkeiten, das in sozialen Anwendungen für den Bereich der Unternehmensprozesse und Unternehmenskommunikation steckt. So merkte bereits 2006 Ray Lane von Oracle an
&#8220;All these things that are thought [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Das große Interesse an sozialen Netzwerken und Video im Internet bestätigt das hohe Potential, dass das soziale Web mit sich bringt. Andererseits lenkt es jedoch ab von dem Möglichkeiten, das in sozialen Anwendungen für den Bereich der Unternehmensprozesse und Unternehmenskommunikation steckt. So merkte bereits 2006 Ray Lane von Oracle an<br />
<em>&#8220;All these things that are thought to be consumer services are coming into the enterprise&#8221;.</em></p>
<p>In den USA vollziehen Unternehmen bereits diesen Schritt. Laut dem Dartmouth Center for Marketing Research, MA, weist Inc. 500 Index der schnellst wachsenden Unternehmen weißt dort einen Anteil von 39% Unternehmensblogs (2007: 19%) aus. Selbst wenn ein dort zu beobachtendes Wachstum um 20% beim Einsatz von Video innerhalb der Unternehmensabläufe auf 45% dieser Unternehmen nicht direkt übertragbar auf hiesige Marktverhältnisse sein muss, sehen wir zumindest einen deutlichen Indikator für das Gesamtpotential. So prognostiziert Forrester zb. für das Jahr 2013 einen Weltmarkt von 4.6 Mrd US$ für Unternehmensanwendungen basierend auf Web 2.0 Technologien.<br />
Der <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype-Zyklus">Hype-Zyklus</a> neuer Technologien</p>
<p>Gartner beschäftigt sich in einer Studie mit dem Hype-Zyklus neuer Technologien. Hier heisst es, die Einführung von Web 2.0-Anwendungen ist nicht gleichzustellen mit der Zufriedenheit.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.eyetag.de/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/gartnerhype220084.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-147 aligncenter" title="gartner_hypecycle" src="http://blog.eyetag.de/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/gartnerhype220084.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="349" /></a></p>
<p>Das Papier sagt <a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=739613">27 Technolgietrends</a> voraus, die sich mittelfristig in Unternehmen etablieren werden. Acht davon sollen sich besonders stark auf Unternehmen auswirken. Dazu gehören vor allem: Green IT, Web 2.0, Soziale Netzwerke, Cloud Computing, Virtuelle Welten, Videoconferencing und Microblogging.</p>
<p>Viele der Technologien müssen allerdings erst von den Endkonsumenten erlernt werden, bevor sie im Unternehmen angewendet werden. Firmen sammeln Erfahrung im Einsatz der Technologien, spüren den Erfolg und die kulturellen Auswirkungen spüren werden. Jackie Fenn von Gartner meint:</p>
<p><em> Later &#8212; in between two and five years &#8212; cloud computing and service-oriented architecture (SOA), which is moving up the Slope of Enlightenment, will deliver transformation in terms of driving deep changes in the role and capabilities of IT. Finally, public virtual worlds, which are suffering from disillusionment after their peak of hype in 2007, will in the long term represent an important media channel to support and build broader communities of interest.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/motionpicture/social-software-als-segment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strategical Options for Webvideo</title>
		<link>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/strategical-options-for-webvideo-preview/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/strategical-options-for-webvideo-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikolaus Reinelt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Motionpicture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/strategical-options-for-webvideo-preview/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THe following comes in cooperation with Bertram of gugelproductions. It is adapted to our findings in the IPTV Benchmarking Study &#8220;IPTV vs. WebTV&#8221;.
Today, producers of motionpicture and TV contents can choose from an array of platforms to provide their work to a broader audience. Conversely, platform providers in most cases can pick from a multitude [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THe following comes in cooperation <a target="_blank" href="http://www.gugelproductions.de/blog/2007/strategische-optionen-fuer-plattformbetreiber-und-produzenten.html">with Bertram</a> of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.gugelproductions.de/blog/">gugelproductions</a>. It is adapted to our findings in the IPTV Benchmarking Study <a target="_blank" href="http://www.thebrainbehind.com/studies/2007_iptv/index_engl.php">&#8220;IPTV vs. WebTV&#8221;</a>.<br />
Today, producers of motionpicture and TV contents can choose from an array of platforms to provide their work to a broader audience. Conversely, platform providers in most cases can pick from a multitude of contents to offer. In times of announcements of new video sites coming in almost by the hour, VoD or streaming offers both have to stay focussed in order to asses arising opportunities. Increasingly, a seperation between Internet TV as &#8220;Over-the-top&#8221; distribution and telco IPTV as a new &#8220;institutionalized&#8221; mean of distribution becomes hard to make.<br />
To provide a basic methodic famework for producers and platform owners, we assembled the following matrix, showing options for both sides.</p>
<div style="text-align: center"><img id="image125" alt="Distribution_Matrix" src="http://blog.eyetag.de/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/distributionmatrix1.jpg" /></div>
<div align="left" style="text-align: center">
<div align="left">
<div align="left">To segment platforms we then used three criteria:</div>
<div align="left">
<ul>
<li><strong>Linearity of program and on demand availability</strong></li>
<li><strong>Channel Control</strong></li>
<li><strong>Programming Control</strong></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="left">By differentiating on these criteria, one can distinguish between the following delivery mechanisms:</p>
<div align="left">
<ul>
<li><strong>TV:</strong> Regardless of which transmission technology used - cable, terrestrial, satelite or closed, IP-based networks - programing pursued by TV always is being characterised by linearity. This delivery mechanism commands a high level of control by excluding all other forms of usage and signal only can be received and decoded by standardized end-devices. Access to this form of program supply is even being regulated by the government due to limited capacity fro transmission. TV alltogther is the most closed system.</li>
<li><strong>Broadband Offerings:</strong> They are determined by an on demand provisioning of contents. However, channel control is still very present on this delivery type. In this case it is not being excerted by dedicated network structures, but by specific technologies as DRM or special types of application, which exclusively are being able to receive and display these proprietary signals. Access to Broadband Offerings is not being subject to authoreties regulation. Neverthenless platform owners issue certain requirements and rules for incorporating contents to their platforms. Examples: Joost, Babelgum, German Telekom&#8217;s T-Onlinevision, iTMS.</li>
<li><strong>Web TV:</strong> Web TV contents are being deployed on Demand, but always embody a highly serial character. Providers in this segment are clearly commanding formatting and type of contents over here, in order to not diminish the serial qualities of the program. Often, producers become platform owners in this class. In opposite to Broadband Offerings, control on the conduit is being controlled less tight. Contents are available free on the net and can be spreaded in many cases without constraints. Examples: Rocketboom, Ask a Ninja, mobuzz.tv</li>
<li><strong>Videoclips:</strong> On the bottom end videoclips or webclips make up for the most free abailable form of video content. In this class neither control of contents nor of their distribution exist. Producers and consumers enjoy both maximum freedom of choice. This leads to consumers becoming producers. Of course on demand accesibility is fully prevalent in this case. Examples are: YouTube, myVideo, Metacafe.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="left">Looking on the horizointal axis, contents can also be divided into four categories:<br />
Top-Tier and Second-Tier contents, Indy- and Niche contents and Prosumer- or User-Generated-Content.</p>
<div align="left">
<ul>
<li><strong>Top-tier:</strong> Expensive, valuable assets that carry the maximum possible returns . These Blockbuster-type of assets are being produced and exploited on enormous financial expenses.</li>
<li><strong>Second-Tier:</strong> Library titles and older shows, in most cases passed already all stages of the value chain.</li>
<li><strong>Indy- and Niche Contents:</strong> Include a broad array, reaching from semi-prodessional amateur movies all the way up to professionaly produced contents originating from many sources outside big, network media entities</li>
<li><strong>User-Generated-Content (UGC):</strong> All type of material produced by consumers or prosumers</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="left">This classification resulted into 16 combinations of which platform owners and producers can choose from.</p>
<div align="left">In a next step stress on particular combinations of distribution and type of contents and describe related strategies. But first we look at the overall recouping opportunity of production costs via webvideo.</div>
<div style="text-align: center"><img alt="Production_Costs_Web_Revenue" id="image126" src="http://blog.eyetag.de/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/productioncosts1.jpg" /></div>
<div align="left">
<div align="left">This figure illustrates production costs and obtainable returns from distributing video or film on the internet.</div>
<div align="left">
<div align="left">The curve progressions in this illustration are ideal an rely on an educated guess. The curves shape there is depending significantly on factors quality/relevance, community, and succesfull management/marketing power on producers site. Following the occurence of those factors revenues can be siginficantly higher or lower.</div>
<div align="left">Next we selected four major generic strategies, the other 12 product/market combinations will be listed in short form only.</div>
<div align="left">
<div align="left">
<div align="left">
<div style="text-align: center"><img alt="Selected_Offerings" id="image127" src="http://blog.eyetag.de/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/selectedofferings1.jpg" /></div>
<div align="left">
<ul>
<li>Top-Tier Contents are increasingly offered as microchunked webclips. Perhaps the most known example in this field is &#8220;Saturday Night Live&#8221;. In the meantime there are not many premiers of shows or films left that haven&#8217;t been promoted on video platforms beforehands. Primary goal behind a Top-Tier videoclips strategy should always be to generate and increase demand on complementary platforms.</li>
<li>We have witnessed various efforts to merge UGC and regular TV progaming before. Discussion on a YouTube TV channel are still going on and by its Ziddio portal Comcast setup a site aiming to move UGC videos straight onto the TV screen. Even ABC announced such a show recently with the i-Cought show, planned to be based completely on UGC.</li>
<li>Rocketboom is the poster child of another combination. They are positioned around a sweet spot, being made up by a high fit to typical demand and the internets very own characteristics of a match between Indy- and Prosumer contents.</li>
<li>Broadband Offerings combined with Second-Tier contents have gone large latest since movie download offerings appeared. Second-Tier is repeatedly being used for trialing platforms and asses opportunities. Joost is one example here, although they are (as many others in this lively market) a hybrid between Indy and Second-Tier distribution.</li>
</ul>
<p>Lastly, here are the other strategic options at a glance:</p>
<ul>
<li>TV+Top-Tier: Focus on exclusivity- and quality</li>
<li>TV+Second-Tier: Windowing, Exploitation of Evergreens</li>
<li>TV+Indycontent: Aggregation und Formatting</li>
<li>Broadband Offering+Top-Tier: Premium Strategy</li>
<li>Broadband Offering+Indy Content: Specialinterest- und Niche Strategies</li>
<li>Broadband Offering+User Generated Content: Aggregation and Packaging</li>
<li>Web TV+Top-Tier: Promotion, Communitybuilding and Premium Advertising</li>
<li>Web TV+Second-Tier: Formatting and Windowing, Adaption</li>
<li>Web TV+UGC: Packaging</li>
<li>Videoclips+Second-Tier: Platform Business</li>
<li>Videoclips+Indy Content: Enabler</li>
<li>Videoclips+UGC: Aggregator, Destinationsite</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/strategical-options-for-webvideo-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Study &#x201c;IPTV vs. Web TV&#x201d; published</title>
		<link>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/new-study-iptv-vs-web-tv-published/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/new-study-iptv-vs-web-tv-published/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 13:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikolaus Reinelt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/new-study-iptv-vs-web-tv-published/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just the other day we completed an upgrade to last years IPTV Benchmark Study. This years edition was published in cooperation with Nokia Siemens networks and is focussing in particular on the gradually growing competition between open and managed IP platforms. 
The following chapters were contributed by eyetag media engineers network:
- Web TV: Vertical disruption [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just the other day <a href="http://www.thebrainbehind.com" target="top">w</a><a href="http://www.eyetag.de" target="top">e</a> completed an upgrade to last years <a href="http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/grassroots-thrive-on-digital-platforms/" target="top">IPTV Benchmark Study</a>. This years edition was published in cooperation with Nokia Siemens networks and is focussing in particular on the gradually growing competition between open and managed IP platforms. </p>
<p>The following chapters were contributed by eyetag media engineers network:<br />
- Web TV: Vertical disruption in times of Web 2.0<br />
- Top-tier type of contents: Struggle over channel and platform control (including reference case &#8220;Anti-Tube&#8221;)<br />
- Second-tier type of contents: Finding a viable business model<br />
- Independent and prosumer content: Absorbing the trend and leveraging assets on the edge<br />
plus snapshot chapters on Joost and Babelgum, Brightcove and Youtube.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thebrainbehind.com/studies/2007_iptv/index_engl.php" target="top">Order your copy now</a>. And buy one for your little sister, too..!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/new-study-iptv-vs-web-tv-published/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Show on lawsuit against Google/Youtube</title>
		<link>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/daily-show-viacom-reports-on-the-lawsuit-against-googleyoutube/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/daily-show-viacom-reports-on-the-lawsuit-against-googleyoutube/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikolaus Reinelt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Generation: X]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/daily-show-viacom-reports-on-the-lawsuit-against-googleyoutube/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; short and sweet - couldn&#8217;t get around it, just to good;!


UPDATE: unsuprisingly the video has been removed from motherload as well as from youtube. here is a copy, case you haven&#8217;t seen it yet&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; short and sweet - couldn&#8217;t get around it, just to good;!<br />
<center><embed FlashVars='config=http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/xml/data_synd.jhtml?vid=84159%26myspace=false' src='http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/syndicated_player/index.jhtml' quality='high' bgcolor='#006699' width='340' height='325' name='comedy_player' align='middle' allowScriptAccess='always' allownetworking='external' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' pluginspage='http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer'></embed></center><br />
</p>
<p>UPDATE: unsuprisingly the video has been removed from motherload as well as from youtube. <a href="http://www.devilducky.com/media/59565/">here</a> is a copy, case you haven&#8217;t seen it yet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/daily-show-viacom-reports-on-the-lawsuit-against-googleyoutube/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changing the Paradigm of TV&#x2019;s Value Prop</title>
		<link>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/changing-the-paradigm-of-tvs-value-prop/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/changing-the-paradigm-of-tvs-value-prop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 09:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikolaus Reinelt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Motionpicture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/changing-the-paradigm-of-tvs-value-prop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the title of my most recent study project, over which I just graduated to MBA in Media Management. Below I want to give a little impression of what the paper was about.

The paradigmatic changes of consumers&#8217; value prop - all of which are regular subject to this blog and thus shall not be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the title of my most recent study project, over which I just graduated to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dermedienmba.de">MBA in Media Management</a>. Below I want to give a little impression of what the paper was about.</p>
<div style="text-align: center"><a href="http://blog.eyetag.de/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/MT_ChangingParadigm_cover.pdf"><img alt="MT_ChangingParadigm_cover" id="image114" src="http://blog.eyetag.de/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/MT_ChangingParadigm.jpg" /></a></div>
<p>The paradigmatic changes of consumers&#8217; value prop - all of which are regular subject to this blog and thus shall not be repeated here - affect a number of related industries and throw up a plethora of questions on the future distribution of filmed entertainment.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;We are searching for the new platform or the new channel that will drive the profits in the future, but there are so many unknowns . . . What we do know is that the entire model is up for grabs.&#8221;,</em></p></blockquote>
<p><em> </em>said Kevin Tsujihara, president of Warner Bros. Home Entertainment Group already in 2005, marking a change in executives&#8217; mindsets that is almost common sense among industry leaders today.<br />
The thesis focuses on processes, operations and questions of a strategic innovation management resulting from the tectonic shift filmed entertainment is undergoing these days. Extracts of data from all important segments are being collected, agnostic of platform or delivery method, since market segmentation in IP’s advent to TV needs to embrace a new scope of competition. Underlying core belief is that markets are substantially driven by customers’ sets of needs and attached value propositions and hence products can only be developed by careful exploration of those needs. Ratio of argumentation is that by building up excellence in meeting those needs, traces for exploiting customer base and benefit from such engagement can be found.</p>
<p>Core interest of the paper was to discover differentiation options by leveraging open network services and their multicast and participation capabilities in comparison to linear broadcast service offerings of the past. What drives users of mass market numbers now to the Internet and its myriads of communities and social networks?<br />
What can managed network operators and content providers learn from this migration? How can they incorporate success factors into their own environments and drive market evolvement actively?</p>
<p>In order to reach to those findings, the opening chapter of the paper is concerned with a basic description of the platforms competition, their respective service propositions and fundamentals about the essence of value add.<br />
Basic usage patterns and distinct user types in the fragmenting media landscape where examined in the next chapter. Seven key trends in digital individualization helped in the later course of the research at determining success factors and framing disruption to industry incumbents. Following up background information on changing motives and value capture within networked media was provided.</p>
<p>Chapter 3, Service Analysis, added more insights to the industry. It investigated more of the specific structure of each market and general industry independencies by analyzing value chains and business webs, generic payment models and exemplified offerings of digital TV (“Best of Breed”), IPTV (“The Pioneers”) and Broadband TV (“The Trials”). Basic assumptions for pre-requisites to success at on-demand content provision where drawn and lead to three key success factors. <em>Content range, value add by functionality</em> and <em>achieving convenient media experiences</em>. Broadband TV brings strong complementary capabilities to the area of broadcast, so in a summary to the service analysis chapter the evolutionary effects of broadband video to the industry where illustrated.<br />
In Chapter 4 resource-based perspective was added to the examination. Variables for a successful differentiation where collected in here.<br />
But what path towards achieving innovation advantage can be chosen? The essence of paradigmatic changes examined was subsumed in the last part and the findings are attached to three types of new aggregation services (Microplatforms, Aggregators and Reconstructors, following <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bubblegeneration.com">Umair&#8217;s</a> classification).<br />
Network effects occurring out of distributed economies of scale waited to be explored. Absorbing of users’ value propositions and inviting them to participatory engagement turns out to be a likely way to go. Analyzing incorporation potential requires to look distinctly to<br />
barriers of technical, economical or other structural and cultural origin. Although broadcast and pay TV still yields by far the largest share of exploitation of TV contents, signs are for change. TV companies should use their strengths in building up relationships because of their high competence in creating emotion and involvement. In the course of the thesis its being demonstrated that they are lacking capabilities to develop thoroughly and sustainable better relationships to their audience. It is being recommended for them to increasingly acquire resources that are not only asset driven, but aim to support engagement in the relationship business element of networked media of the future. By improving customer relationship, the degree of control enforcement will loose its exclusive importance.<br />
Arguable approaches are shown in the following depict.</p>
<div style="text-align: center"><img alt="Business Model Paradigm in Networked TV Entertainment" id="image115" src="http://blog.eyetag.de/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/business%20modell%20paradigm.jpg" /></div>
<div align="center"><em> Business Model Paradigm in Networked TV Entertainment,<br />
source: eyetag media engineers</em></div>
<p align="left">This assessment frames two central dimensions of change being discovered in the thesis. Competency in relationship engagement with audiences on the y-axis and channel control or degree of customer ownership on x-axis. Those two dimensions shape basic occurrences of business approaches and draw the line between the traditional media model and the new, networked media environment. The arrow describes the evolvement of the business models and indicates market lifecycles from maturity (broadcast) to introduction (broadband TV).<br />
In the paper it is suggested for media companies to incorporate “three pillars of the paradigm shift” (Business logics, Service Types and Business models) to their strategic agendas and thus to their innovation processes.
</p>
<p align="left">For mastering the manifold challenges of a networked, heavily Micromedia influenced and thus hyper competitive TV landscape, they will clearly need to perform better on the variables that determine industry disruption.</p>
<div align="left">
<p align="left">More information on the topic and the paper - as always - <a href="http://blog.eyetag.de/contact">on request</a>.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/changing-the-paradigm-of-tvs-value-prop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want to get &#x2018;Joost&#x2019;?</title>
		<link>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/want-to-get-joost/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/want-to-get-joost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikolaus Reinelt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Generation: X]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Motionpicture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/anyone-wants-to-get-joost/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You want to jump into for the beta test of the next generation TV aggregating service? 2 more available&#8230;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want to jump into for the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.joost.com/betatest">beta test</a> of the next generation TV aggregating service? 2 more available&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/want-to-get-joost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Big Mashup by Sun Microsystems</title>
		<link>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/the-big-mashup-by-sun-microsystems/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/the-big-mashup-by-sun-microsystems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 10:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikolaus Reinelt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Generation: X]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Interactive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/the-big-mashup-by-sun-microsystems/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Experts discuss how the net is changing entertainment and news gathering in the Participation Age. Nice visionary summary with statements from Andrew and other drivers of particapatory culture. Check it out!


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Experts discuss how the net is changing entertainment and news gathering in the Participation Age. Nice visionary summary with statements from Andrew and other drivers of particapatory culture. Check it out!</p>
<div align="center"><sorry , piece gone><br />
</sorry></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.eyetag.de/industries/broadcast/the-big-mashup-by-sun-microsystems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
