<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>FedSmith.com - Current Events</title>
<link>http://www.fedsmith.com/articles</link>
<description>The Federal Government is changing rapidly and constantly. FedSmith.com provides readers with a wide variety of articles on these current events that can impact your career, your workplace and your agency.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 FedSmith.com</copyright>



<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/fedsmith/news/current" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title><![CDATA[5.7% for Retirees in 2009? It May Still Go Higher]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/fedsmith/news/current/~3/338036185/</link>
<description>Here is a reality check for readers. Inflation is alive and well. Federal retirees are on track for an increase of 5.7% next year--with another three months to go before the final figure is known. Federal employees may get an average of 3.9%--or there may be a continuing resolution that would delay finalizing the budget until 2009.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=mC4phJ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=mC4phJ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=WeJaEJ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=WeJaEJ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=TseOfj"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=TseOfj" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=xcGxRJ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=xcGxRJ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/comment/1655/</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1655@http://www.fedsmith.com/articles</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:57:29 CST</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/1655/</feedburner:origLink></item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[Computing Your 2009 Pay Rate]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/fedsmith/news/current/~3/335106417/</link>
<description>What will your paycheck look like in 2009? It looks like the 3.9% average pay raise for federal GS employees may eventually be approved. &lt;a href="http://www.fedsmith.com/pay_rates/index_estimated.php" target="_new"&gt;Here is a new table&lt;/a&gt;  that will give you an idea of what your check might look like next year.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=HPMWdJ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=HPMWdJ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=iq5zFJ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=iq5zFJ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=UH8E3j"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=UH8E3j" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=vvEkoJ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=vvEkoJ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/comment/1649/</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1649@http://www.fedsmith.com/articles</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:38:19 CST</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/1649/</feedburner:origLink></item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[Power of Government, Gas and Speed Limits]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/fedsmith/news/current/~3/328849622/</link>
<description>Should the federal government mandate a nationwide speed limit of 55 MPH in an effort to cut the consumption of gas? One Senator has raised the possibility of again limiting speed on the nation's highways to 55.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=CErvSJ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=CErvSJ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=GJDQ8J"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=GJDQ8J" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=3Zoqtj"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=3Zoqtj" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=iGZZuJ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=iGZZuJ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/comment/1644/</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1644@http://www.fedsmith.com/articles</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jul 2008 07:47:58 CST</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/1644/</feedburner:origLink></item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mileage Reimbursement Rate Headed Up?]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/fedsmith/news/current/~3/318876441/</link>
<description>The Internal Revenue Service is raising the mileage reimbursement rate because of the increasing cost of filling up a car with gas. How will this decision impact federal employees?&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=XM6JRI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=XM6JRI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=YPB4XI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=YPB4XI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=KDtbEi"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=KDtbEi" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=IKaMVI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=IKaMVI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/comment/1636/</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1636@http://www.fedsmith.com/articles</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:57:20 CST</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/1636/</feedburner:origLink></item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[Paid Parental Leave for Feds: Good Idea or Election Year Pandering?]]></title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/fedsmith/news/current/~3/316202778/</link>
<description>A bill approving four weeks of paid parental leave (with more available with OPM approval) has been passed by the House. Is this expansion of federal employee benefits a good idea or just election year pandering by politicians? Vote in this survey and send in your opinion.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=r1PutI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=r1PutI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=Yv9tsI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=Yv9tsI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=XrdCqi"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=XrdCqi" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?a=LTPOYI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/fedsmith/news/current?i=LTPOYI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/comment/1631/</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1631@http://www.fedsmith.com/articles</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:14:58 CST</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/1631/</feedburner:origLink></item>


</channel>
</rss>
