<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>FedSmith.com - LER</title>
<link>http://www.fedsmith.com/articles</link>
<description>The Federal Government is one of the most highly unionized sectors of American society. Moreover, various third parties provide a continuing stream of litigation that can impact all employees. FedSmith.com provides up-to-date articles on labor and employee relations issues to help you stay informed about these events and how they may impact your career.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 FedSmith.com</copyright>



<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/fedsmith/news/ler" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title><![CDATA[Honest Herman - GM Salesman and  Union Steward...]]></title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/fedsmith/news/ler/~3/MyNFlqxO700/</link>
<description>General Motors, the symbol of American capitalism, is now being run by a combination of the same managers who ran it into bankruptcy and the United Auto Workers union. Perhaps the "new GM" will be like the "labor-management partnership" days under the Clinton-Gore administration where the union sometimes became involved in making management decisions.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/g2AtYzrwHioqhVi30NjC7Spfq6Y/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/g2AtYzrwHioqhVi30NjC7Spfq6Y/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/g2AtYzrwHioqhVi30NjC7Spfq6Y/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/g2AtYzrwHioqhVi30NjC7Spfq6Y/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=MyNFlqxO700:XMI5kInK7Vs:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=MyNFlqxO700:XMI5kInK7Vs:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?i=MyNFlqxO700:XMI5kInK7Vs:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=MyNFlqxO700:XMI5kInK7Vs:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=MyNFlqxO700:XMI5kInK7Vs:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/comment/2043/</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2043@http://www.fedsmith.com/articles</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Jul 2009 07:16:39 CST</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/2043/</feedburner:origLink></item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[HR'S Station Stop Called "Disapproval"]]></title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/fedsmith/news/ler/~3/Kc3tBhCSJRg/</link>
<description>The author contends that Agency heads should either not exercise their review in favor of challenging clauses in a negotiated collective bargaining agreement when their enforcement is an actual issue for management or they should delegate the power to the managers at the bargaining table. He says, "they need to get off the tracks so that agencies can bargain for immediate implementation of mid-term agreements upon execution, not upon approval."
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1XtscXxGcRIUw-khGrGPqPDw5Lw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1XtscXxGcRIUw-khGrGPqPDw5Lw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1XtscXxGcRIUw-khGrGPqPDw5Lw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1XtscXxGcRIUw-khGrGPqPDw5Lw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=Kc3tBhCSJRg:9q6opDU-98U:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=Kc3tBhCSJRg:9q6opDU-98U:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?i=Kc3tBhCSJRg:9q6opDU-98U:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=Kc3tBhCSJRg:9q6opDU-98U:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=Kc3tBhCSJRg:9q6opDU-98U:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/comment/2042/</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2042@http://www.fedsmith.com/articles</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Jul 2009 06:39:21 CST</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/2042/</feedburner:origLink></item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Proposed Federal Benefit That Won't Die]]></title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/fedsmith/news/ler/~3/wRD1haiwyks/</link>
<description>A proposal to allow federal employees under the FERS system to get credit for unused sick leave did not get through the legislative process last year and was recently eliminated in new legislation during the legislative process. The proposal is back again though in a bill that has an assortment of new, improved benefits for portions of the federal workforce.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mshfQ40WNCNJpvcb2Roq9Y8WTB8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mshfQ40WNCNJpvcb2Roq9Y8WTB8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mshfQ40WNCNJpvcb2Roq9Y8WTB8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mshfQ40WNCNJpvcb2Roq9Y8WTB8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=wRD1haiwyks:rBzc6vKuH-w:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=wRD1haiwyks:rBzc6vKuH-w:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?i=wRD1haiwyks:rBzc6vKuH-w:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=wRD1haiwyks:rBzc6vKuH-w:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=wRD1haiwyks:rBzc6vKuH-w:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/comment/2036/</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2036@http://www.fedsmith.com/articles</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:45:33 CST</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/2036/</feedburner:origLink></item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[Renewed Call for Partnership:  Will It Result in an Old Horse Beating or a New Opportunity?]]></title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/fedsmith/news/ler/~3/W2FvqQ5amUA/</link>
<description>Federal unions and some congressmen are asking for an executive order reestablishing the partnerships of the Clinton 90s.  The author asks if we'd be better served by a stakeholder discussion before leaping into a repeat of a program that had very limited results.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VJoCj27m0F5TT9i0gICff_DHeK4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VJoCj27m0F5TT9i0gICff_DHeK4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VJoCj27m0F5TT9i0gICff_DHeK4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VJoCj27m0F5TT9i0gICff_DHeK4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=W2FvqQ5amUA:yMhZOukRqug:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=W2FvqQ5amUA:yMhZOukRqug:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?i=W2FvqQ5amUA:yMhZOukRqug:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=W2FvqQ5amUA:yMhZOukRqug:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=W2FvqQ5amUA:yMhZOukRqug:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/comment/2034/</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2034@http://www.fedsmith.com/articles</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:52:50 CST</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/2034/</feedburner:origLink></item>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[A Dispute That Could Only Arise Between Public Employees and a Governmental Agency]]></title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/fedsmith/news/ler/~3/QFmI3Xv-XsY/</link>
<description>Federal agencies and federal employee unions have their own agendas with the result being disputes going on for years that seem to defy logic. The appeals court calls this case the "sort of dispute that could only arise between public employees and a governmental agency."
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uKmyq8Wl9qKvBdZxcbR3-AtLsZA/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uKmyq8Wl9qKvBdZxcbR3-AtLsZA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uKmyq8Wl9qKvBdZxcbR3-AtLsZA/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uKmyq8Wl9qKvBdZxcbR3-AtLsZA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=QFmI3Xv-XsY:cGK4HSl2P3E:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=QFmI3Xv-XsY:cGK4HSl2P3E:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?i=QFmI3Xv-XsY:cGK4HSl2P3E:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=QFmI3Xv-XsY:cGK4HSl2P3E:7Q72WNTAKBA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?a=QFmI3Xv-XsY:cGK4HSl2P3E:l6gmwiTKsz0"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/fedsmith/news/ler?d=l6gmwiTKsz0" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
<comments>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/comment/2021/</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2021@http://www.fedsmith.com/articles</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:49:56 CST</pubDate>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.fedsmith.com/article/2021/</feedburner:origLink></item>


</channel>
</rss>
