<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LSE Impact</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences</link>
	<description>Understanding impact and practice in academic research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 11:00:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">64384046</site>	<item>
		<title>Information literacy needs to be more than fact checking</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/01/information-literacy-needs-to-be-more-than-fact-checking/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/01/information-literacy-needs-to-be-more-than-fact-checking/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 11:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experts and Expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libraries]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56215</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Modern societies rely on models, optimisation systems, and institutional frameworks to interpret complex problems. But how can you tell when technically rigorous systems present an overly narrow interpretation of the &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/01/information-literacy-needs-to-be-more-than-fact-checking/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/01/information-literacy-needs-to-be-more-than-fact-checking/">Information literacy needs to be more than fact checking</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/07/01/information-literacy-needs-to-be-more-than-fact-checking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56215</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you want to publish papers in your own language, look to Diamond OA</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/30/if-you-want-to-publish-papers-in-your-own-language-look-to-diamond-oa/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/30/if-you-want-to-publish-papers-in-your-own-language-look-to-diamond-oa/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equity Diversity and Inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bibliodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diamond oa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language of science]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The English language has long sat at the top of a prestige hierarchy in academic publishing. Exploring the diversity of multilingual and non-English diamond open access publications, Johan Rooryck and &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/30/if-you-want-to-publish-papers-in-your-own-language-look-to-diamond-oa/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/30/if-you-want-to-publish-papers-in-your-own-language-look-to-diamond-oa/">If you want to publish papers in your own language, look to Diamond OA</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/30/if-you-want-to-publish-papers-in-your-own-language-look-to-diamond-oa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56201</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Brexit repositioned UK global science</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/25/brexit-10-how-brexit-repositioned-uk-global-science/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/25/brexit-10-how-brexit-repositioned-uk-global-science/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 10:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brexit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Collaborations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56193</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Brexit not only took the UK out of the political orbit of Europe, it also disrupted close research ties that existed with the continent. Using Brexit as a natural experiment, &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/25/brexit-10-how-brexit-repositioned-uk-global-science/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/25/brexit-10-how-brexit-repositioned-uk-global-science/">How Brexit repositioned UK global science</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/25/brexit-10-how-brexit-repositioned-uk-global-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56193</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI promised to democratise academic publishing &#8211; the evidence says otherwise</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/23/ai-promised-to-democratise-academic-publishing-the-evidence-says-otherwise/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/23/ai-promised-to-democratise-academic-publishing-the-evidence-says-otherwise/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 10:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Data and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equity Diversity and Inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI translation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bibliodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language Barriers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56181</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Generative AI has been widely embraced as a tool that could level the playing field in academic publishing, giving non-native English speakers and researchers in under-resourced settings a fairer chance. &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/23/ai-promised-to-democratise-academic-publishing-the-evidence-says-otherwise/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/23/ai-promised-to-democratise-academic-publishing-the-evidence-says-otherwise/">AI promised to democratise academic publishing – the evidence says otherwise</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/23/ai-promised-to-democratise-academic-publishing-the-evidence-says-otherwise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56181</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The UN is advocating for a GDP alternative – can social science provide one?</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/22/the-un-is-advocating-for-a-gdp-alternative-can-social-science-provide-one/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/22/the-un-is-advocating-for-a-gdp-alternative-can-social-science-provide-one/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 11:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SHAPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternatives to GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellbeing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The UN is considering the future of GDP. Could a new metric encompass a far wider range of social scientific indicators?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/22/the-un-is-advocating-for-a-gdp-alternative-can-social-science-provide-one/">The UN is advocating for a GDP alternative – can social science provide one?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/22/the-un-is-advocating-for-a-gdp-alternative-can-social-science-provide-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56164</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a cartoon fox became a research method</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/19/how-a-cartoon-fox-became-a-research-method/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/19/how-a-cartoon-fox-became-a-research-method/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 10:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participatory research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research methods]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56146</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>After spending three years with two Mixtec Indigenous communities in Oaxaca, Mexico, Mariana Hernández-Montilla created an animation of a fox as a way of thanking them. What began as an &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/19/how-a-cartoon-fox-became-a-research-method/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/19/how-a-cartoon-fox-became-a-research-method/">How a cartoon fox became a research method</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/19/how-a-cartoon-fox-became-a-research-method/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56146</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rejection in academia is structural not personal</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/17/rejection-in-academia-is-structural-not-personal/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/17/rejection-in-academia-is-structural-not-personal/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Early career researchers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejection]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>From student assessments, peer review reports to funding and job applications, rejection is an increasingly common feature of academic life. Tara-Lyn Camilleri and Ed Ivimey-Cook argue that unlike other high-profile &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/17/rejection-in-academia-is-structural-not-personal/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/17/rejection-in-academia-is-structural-not-personal/">Rejection in academia is structural not personal</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/17/rejection-in-academia-is-structural-not-personal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56135</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why knowing who studies social science and humanities matters</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/16/why-knowing-who-studies-social-science-and-humanities-matters/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/16/why-knowing-who-studies-social-science-and-humanities-matters/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 10:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Equity Diversity and Inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SHAPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social sciences]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56125</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In an increasingly financially constrained higher education system social science and humanities disciplines find themselves under increasing pressure. Discussing the British Academy’s new Who studies SHAPE dashboard, Almendra Guzman Rivas &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/16/why-knowing-who-studies-social-science-and-humanities-matters/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/16/why-knowing-who-studies-social-science-and-humanities-matters/">Why knowing who studies social science and humanities matters</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/16/why-knowing-who-studies-social-science-and-humanities-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56125</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New rules for federal research grants will limit their reach and leave US research isolated</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/15/new-rules-for-federal-research-grants-will-limit-their-reach-and-leave-us-research-isolated/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/15/new-rules-for-federal-research-grants-will-limit-their-reach-and-leave-us-research-isolated/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 11:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Experts and Expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Research Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sci Comm]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56116</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A proposed overhaul of US federal grant rules has been debated mainly as a fight over political control of science. But, Rob Johnson argues, it would also reshape how publicly &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/15/new-rules-for-federal-research-grants-will-limit-their-reach-and-leave-us-research-isolated/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/15/new-rules-for-federal-research-grants-will-limit-their-reach-and-leave-us-research-isolated/">New rules for federal research grants will limit their reach and leave US research isolated</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/15/new-rules-for-federal-research-grants-will-limit-their-reach-and-leave-us-research-isolated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56116</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gendered AI design reflects and reinforces society’s biases</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/12/gendered-ai-design-reflects-and-reinforces-societys-biases/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/12/gendered-ai-design-reflects-and-reinforces-societys-biases/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Data and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equity Diversity and Inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research methods]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56105</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When AI tools are designed with a gender, they don't just encode gendered values they also encourage users to engage with them in biased ways.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/12/gendered-ai-design-reflects-and-reinforces-societys-biases/">Gendered AI design reflects and reinforces society’s biases</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/06/12/gendered-ai-design-reflects-and-reinforces-societys-biases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56105</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
