<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LSE Impact</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences</link>
	<description>Understanding impact and practice in academic research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 15:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">64384046</site>	<item>
		<title>By linking national scholarly infrastructures we can better understand the impact of global research</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/04/01/by-linking-national-scholarly-infrastructures-we-can-better-understand-the-impact-of-global-research/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/04/01/by-linking-national-scholarly-infrastructures-we-can-better-understand-the-impact-of-global-research/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 15:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bibliodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scholarly Infrastructures]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55461</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Global scholarly information systems provide poor coverage for social science and humanities research taking place outside of the anglophone world and in languages other than English. Paul Donner, Stephan Stahlschmidt, &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/04/01/by-linking-national-scholarly-infrastructures-we-can-better-understand-the-impact-of-global-research/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/04/01/by-linking-national-scholarly-infrastructures-we-can-better-understand-the-impact-of-global-research/">By linking national scholarly infrastructures we can better understand the impact of global research</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/04/01/by-linking-national-scholarly-infrastructures-we-can-better-understand-the-impact-of-global-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55461</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>More evidence doesn’t mean more justice &#8211; The limits of visual technologies in human rights cases</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/31/more-evidence-doesnt-mean-more-justice-the-limits-of-visual-technologies-in-human-rights-cases/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/31/more-evidence-doesnt-mean-more-justice-the-limits-of-visual-technologies-in-human-rights-cases/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 15:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Data and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence for Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experts and Expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidentiary standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual data]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55451</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Digital technologies have democratised the collection of visual evidence. However, as Kamari Maxine Clarke, Jennifer Burrell and Sara Kendall show, how this evidence is translated into evidentiary standards through the &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/31/more-evidence-doesnt-mean-more-justice-the-limits-of-visual-technologies-in-human-rights-cases/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/31/more-evidence-doesnt-mean-more-justice-the-limits-of-visual-technologies-in-human-rights-cases/">More evidence doesn’t mean more justice – The limits of visual technologies in human rights cases</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/31/more-evidence-doesnt-mean-more-justice-the-limits-of-visual-technologies-in-human-rights-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55451</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real threat to trust in science isn’t outright fraud, but the pervasive tweaking of research designs and models</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/30/the-real-threat-to-trust-in-science-isnt-outright-fraud-but-the-pervasive-tweaking-of-research-designs-and-models/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/30/the-real-threat-to-trust-in-science-isnt-outright-fraud-but-the-pervasive-tweaking-of-research-designs-and-models/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 10:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSE comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tweaking]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55441</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Spectacular cases of data fabrication and manipulation unearthed by dedicated “sleuths” are often seen as evidence of a crisis in science. However, discussing their new book, Thomas Plümper and Eric &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/30/the-real-threat-to-trust-in-science-isnt-outright-fraud-but-the-pervasive-tweaking-of-research-designs-and-models/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/30/the-real-threat-to-trust-in-science-isnt-outright-fraud-but-the-pervasive-tweaking-of-research-designs-and-models/">The real threat to trust in science isn’t outright fraud, but the pervasive tweaking of research designs and models</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/30/the-real-threat-to-trust-in-science-isnt-outright-fraud-but-the-pervasive-tweaking-of-research-designs-and-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55441</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three red flags for “evidenced-based” EdTech</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/27/three-red-flags-for-evidenced-based-edtech/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/27/three-red-flags-for-evidenced-based-edtech/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 11:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Data and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence for Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edtech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Based Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Consulting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55432</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Given the sector they are targeting, it is perhaps unsurprising that new EdTech tools often claim to be evidence-based. However, as Natalia Kucirkova outlines, these claims can sometimes be difficult &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/27/three-red-flags-for-evidenced-based-edtech/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/27/three-red-flags-for-evidenced-based-edtech/">Three red flags for “evidenced-based” EdTech</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/27/three-red-flags-for-evidenced-based-edtech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55432</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>For open research to work, research institutions and publishers need to collaborate</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/26/for-open-research-to-work-research-institutions-and-publishers-need-to-collaborate/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/26/for-open-research-to-work-research-institutions-and-publishers-need-to-collaborate/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 11:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarly communication]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55416</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The growth in global and open research has fuelled structural change in scholarly communications and at the same time created significant challenges in ensuring research integrity. Heidi Ormstad, Rebecca Lawrence, &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/26/for-open-research-to-work-research-institutions-and-publishers-need-to-collaborate/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/26/for-open-research-to-work-research-institutions-and-publishers-need-to-collaborate/">For open research to work, research institutions and publishers need to collaborate</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/26/for-open-research-to-work-research-institutions-and-publishers-need-to-collaborate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55416</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predatory university rankings jeopardise the value of Webometrics</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/25/predatory-university-rankings-jeopardise-the-value-of-webometrics/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/25/predatory-university-rankings-jeopardise-the-value-of-webometrics/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 16:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Data and Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measuring Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source Bibliometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predatory Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webometrics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55408</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Webometrics ranking of universities provides a valuable and more comprehensive open data alternative to traditional university rankings. However, as Vladimir M. Moskovkin shows mirror sites and an emergent market &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/25/predatory-university-rankings-jeopardise-the-value-of-webometrics/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/25/predatory-university-rankings-jeopardise-the-value-of-webometrics/">Predatory university rankings jeopardise the value of Webometrics</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/25/predatory-university-rankings-jeopardise-the-value-of-webometrics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55408</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>US social media is getting smaller, angrier, and more Republican</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/24/us-social-media-is-getting-smaller-angrier-and-more-republican/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/24/us-social-media-is-getting-smaller-angrier-and-more-republican/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 11:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Research communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polarization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55392</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Using data from the American National Election Studies, Petter Törnberg shows how social media use in the USA has changed in the period 2020 – 2024 creating a smaller more &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/24/us-social-media-is-getting-smaller-angrier-and-more-republican/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/24/us-social-media-is-getting-smaller-angrier-and-more-republican/">US social media is getting smaller, angrier, and more Republican</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/24/us-social-media-is-getting-smaller-angrier-and-more-republican/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55392</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>We should focus less on research impact and more on research value</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/23/we-should-focus-less-on-research-impact-and-more-on-research-value/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/23/we-should-focus-less-on-research-impact-and-more-on-research-value/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 11:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research evaluation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Can ‘research impact’ be transformed into a paradigm that genuinely nurtures research for societal benefit? This question prompted a recent Australian study by Ruth O’Connor, Sejul Malde, Wendy Russell, Maya &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/23/we-should-focus-less-on-research-impact-and-more-on-research-value/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/23/we-should-focus-less-on-research-impact-and-more-on-research-value/">We should focus less on research impact and more on research value</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/23/we-should-focus-less-on-research-impact-and-more-on-research-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55379</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public writing has become a benchmark of the PhD journey</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/20/public-writing-has-become-a-benchmark-of-the-phd-journey/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/20/public-writing-has-become-a-benchmark-of-the-phd-journey/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 11:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early career researchers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AcWri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhD writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55375</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Writing for public audiences in a variety of media has become a common feature of PhD research. Reflecting on how ORCID and Linkedin have become key platforms for monitoring public &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/20/public-writing-has-become-a-benchmark-of-the-phd-journey/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/20/public-writing-has-become-a-benchmark-of-the-phd-journey/">Public writing has become a benchmark of the PhD journey</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/20/public-writing-has-become-a-benchmark-of-the-phd-journey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55375</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social scientists bring their faith into research – And it shows up in their results</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/18/social-scientists-bring-their-faith-into-research-and-it-shows-up-in-their-results/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/18/social-scientists-bring-their-faith-into-research-and-it-shows-up-in-their-results/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 11:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measuring Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secularization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=55344</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Why do studies on whether religion is disappearing totally contradict each other? Valeria Rainero, Jörg Stolz and Ruud Luijkx discuss their recent research on how faith (or lack of it) &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/18/social-scientists-bring-their-faith-into-research-and-it-shows-up-in-their-results/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/18/social-scientists-bring-their-faith-into-research-and-it-shows-up-in-their-results/">Social scientists bring their faith into research – And it shows up in their results</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/03/18/social-scientists-bring-their-faith-into-research-and-it-shows-up-in-their-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55344</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
