<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LSE Impact</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences</link>
	<description>Understanding impact and practice in academic research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 10:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.11</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">64384046</site>	<item>
		<title>Better teaching can alleviate mathematics anxiety</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/11/03/better-teaching-can-alleviate-mathematics-anxiety/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/11/03/better-teaching-can-alleviate-mathematics-anxiety/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 10:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSE comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maths anxiety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantitative methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Being anxious about mathematics is a common feeling in higher education. Can addressing emotional and affective responses to mathematics improve teaching?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/11/03/better-teaching-can-alleviate-mathematics-anxiety/">Better teaching can alleviate mathematics anxiety</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/11/03/better-teaching-can-alleviate-mathematics-anxiety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56825</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What editorial mutinies reveal about the architecture of academic prestige</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/11/02/what-editorial-mutinies-reveal-about-the-architecture-of-academic-prestige/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/11/02/what-editorial-mutinies-reveal-about-the-architecture-of-academic-prestige/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academic Prestige]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial mutinies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research assessment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56816</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Several major editorial boards have left journals to found competitors. A comparative analysis shows how journal value is tied to &#038; separable from these titles.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/11/02/what-editorial-mutinies-reveal-about-the-architecture-of-academic-prestige/">What editorial mutinies reveal about the architecture of academic prestige</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/11/02/what-editorial-mutinies-reveal-about-the-architecture-of-academic-prestige/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56816</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conflict of interest notices do not protect scientific writing from corporate interests</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/30/conflict-of-interest-notices-do-not-protect-scientific-writing-from-corporate-interests/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/30/conflict-of-interest-notices-do-not-protect-scientific-writing-from-corporate-interests/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 11:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflicts of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghostwriting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56806</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Researchers are increasingly required to demonstrate the societal relevance of their work, often through collaboration with industry. Conflict of interest statements are meant to highlight corporate interests in research. The release of an archive of a US court case offers a unique peek into how one company influenced a paper to promote opioid use. Maud &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/30/conflict-of-interest-notices-do-not-protect-scientific-writing-from-corporate-interests/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/30/conflict-of-interest-notices-do-not-protect-scientific-writing-from-corporate-interests/">Conflict of interest notices do not protect scientific writing from corporate interests</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/30/conflict-of-interest-notices-do-not-protect-scientific-writing-from-corporate-interests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56806</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What 4,200 data points reveal about US government interference in research</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/28/what-4200-data-points-reveal-about-us-government-interference-in-research/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/28/what-4200-data-points-reveal-about-us-government-interference-in-research/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 11:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trump]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56799</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>US federal actions affecting research can look like isolated administrative decisions. A new report shows how they form a consistent and concerted pattern.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/28/what-4200-data-points-reveal-about-us-government-interference-in-research/">What 4,200 data points reveal about US government interference in research</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/28/what-4200-data-points-reveal-about-us-government-interference-in-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56799</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Afterlives, endy moments and entangled temporalities – How to end participatory research projects better</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/27/afterlives-endy-moments-and-entangled-temporalities-how-to-end-participatory-research-projects-better/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/27/afterlives-endy-moments-and-entangled-temporalities-how-to-end-participatory-research-projects-better/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 10:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Experts and Expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSE comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participatory research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualitative research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56788</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>By their nature, participatory research projects rarely just come to an end. Are there ways in which all in involved can find closure?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/27/afterlives-endy-moments-and-entangled-temporalities-how-to-end-participatory-research-projects-better/">Afterlives, endy moments and entangled temporalities – How to end participatory research projects better</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/27/afterlives-endy-moments-and-entangled-temporalities-how-to-end-participatory-research-projects-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56788</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clique or journal community &#8211; Where does accountability lie in editorial decision making?</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/26/clique-or-journal-community-where-does-accountability-lie-in-editorial-decision-making/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/26/clique-or-journal-community-where-does-accountability-lie-in-editorial-decision-making/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 11:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflicts of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial Boards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Academic journals comprise close communities of scholars working on related subjects. This presents many potential conflicts of interest - can they be resolved?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/26/clique-or-journal-community-where-does-accountability-lie-in-editorial-decision-making/">Clique or journal community – Where does accountability lie in editorial decision making?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/26/clique-or-journal-community-where-does-accountability-lie-in-editorial-decision-making/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56779</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How one writer&#8217;s dilemma led to an international movement</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/23/how-one-writers-dilemma-led-to-an-international-movement/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/23/how-one-writers-dilemma-led-to-an-international-movement/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 10:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shut up and write]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing Accountability Groups]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Writing groups modelled on the Shut up and write format have had a big impact on universities and have been carefully studied. However their wider development and impact is less well understood. Jason Murphy and Tyler Shores present a new project aimed at exploring and sharing the many benefits of writing together.&#160; &#160; It’s 2007. &#8230; <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/23/how-one-writers-dilemma-led-to-an-international-movement/">Continued</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/23/how-one-writers-dilemma-led-to-an-international-movement/">How one writer’s dilemma led to an international movement</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/23/how-one-writers-dilemma-led-to-an-international-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56771</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will a M-index to measure academic mentorship create more problems than it solves?</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/22/will-a-m-index-to-measure-academic-mentorship-create-more-problems-than-it-solves/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/22/will-a-m-index-to-measure-academic-mentorship-create-more-problems-than-it-solves/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 10:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Early career researchers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measuring Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M-Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mentorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Environments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56761</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Can academic mentorship be measured? Or will efforts, like a proposed M-Index, lead to further gamification of teaching and learning in postgraduate education?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/22/will-a-m-index-to-measure-academic-mentorship-create-more-problems-than-it-solves/">Will a M-index to measure academic mentorship create more problems than it solves?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/22/will-a-m-index-to-measure-academic-mentorship-create-more-problems-than-it-solves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56761</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>From print to digital and back again – Why the cost of academic books keeps changing</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/21/from-print-to-digital-and-back-again-why-the-cost-of-academic-books-keeps-changing/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/21/from-print-to-digital-and-back-again-why-the-cost-of-academic-books-keeps-changing/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 10:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSE comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSE Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OA books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open research]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The cost of academic books has changed in recent years and asks. Is it possible for long-form academic books to be sustainable and affordable?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/21/from-print-to-digital-and-back-again-why-the-cost-of-academic-books-keeps-changing/">From print to digital and back again – Why the cost of academic books keeps changing</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/21/from-print-to-digital-and-back-again-why-the-cost-of-academic-books-keeps-changing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56753</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Causal overclaiming is common, rising over time, and difficult to avoid</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/20/causal-overclaiming-is-common-rising-over-time-and-difficult-to-avoid/</link>
					<comments>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/20/causal-overclaiming-is-common-rising-over-time-and-difficult-to-avoid/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 10:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Causal claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantitative research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/?p=56739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Academic scholarship is meant to proportion claims to evidence, yet scholars can and do oversell their findings. Is it possible for authors and journals change?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/20/causal-overclaiming-is-common-rising-over-time-and-difficult-to-avoid/">Causal overclaiming is common, rising over time, and difficult to avoid</a> first appeared on <a href="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences">LSE Impact</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/10/20/causal-overclaiming-is-common-rising-over-time-and-difficult-to-avoid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56739</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
