<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Food Politics by Marion Nestle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodpolitics.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.foodpolitics.com/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">106065139</site>	<item>
		<title>Guest post: A visit to my Manhattan terrace</title>
		<link>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/guest-post-a-visit-to-my-manhattan-terrace/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fruits-and-vegetables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant foods]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=28624</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Once again, I am breaking my rule about no guest posts, but this one is too much fun not to share.  Erin Winger interviewed me for her Substack, which she calls Going to Seed, and agreed to let me do a repost.  I thought this would be a great way to start the week.  Enjoy! [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/guest-post-a-visit-to-my-manhattan-terrace/">Guest post: A visit to my Manhattan terrace</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, I am breaking my rule about no guest posts, but this one is too much fun not to share.  Erin Winger <a href="https://erinweinger.substack.com/p/marion-nestle-garden-tour">interviewed me for her Substack</a>, which she calls <a class="button primary" href="https://erinweinger.substack.com/?utm_source=substack&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_content=share&amp;action=share">Going to Seed</a>, and agreed to let me do a repost.  I thought this would be a great way to start the week.  Enjoy!</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="pencraft pc-reset" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!YLwd!,w_40,h_40,c_fill,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F567345fe-ab34-49e9-944e-579e5702ada8_496x496.png" alt="Going to Seed" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></p>
<div id="main" class="main typography use-theme-bg">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-contents pc-reset pubTheme-yiXxQA">
<div class="main-menu" data-testid="navbar">
<div class="mainMenuContent-DME8DR">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-gap-12 pc-paddingLeft-20 pc-paddingRight-20 pc-paddingTop-0 pc-paddingBottom-0 pc-justifyContent-space-between pc-alignItems-center pc-reset border-bottom-detail-k1F6C4 topBar-pIF0J1">
<div class="logoTopCenterSlot-hss6WZ">
<div class="titleContainer-DJYq5v overflowVisible-joA5t0">
<h1 id="wordlogo" class="pencraft pc-reset font-pub-headings-FE5byy reset-IxiVJZ title-oOnUGd titleWithWordmark-GfqxEZ"><a class="pencraft pc-display-contents pc-reset" href="https://erinweinger.substack.com/"><img decoding="async" class="wordmark-WcDTTu" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!VP8a!,e_trim:10:white/e_trim:10:transparent/h_72,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ffb0150ce-18e9-4c59-b88d-ff07240f73f7_834x302.png" alt="Going to Seed" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></a></h1>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="single-post-container" role="main" aria-label="Post">
<div class="container">
<div class="single-post">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-contents pc-reset pubTheme-yiXxQA">
<article class="typography newsletter-post post">
<div class="post-header" role="region" aria-label="Post header">
<h1 class="post-title published title-X77sOw" dir="auto"><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f957.png" alt="🥗" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> A Visit to Nutritionist Marion Nestle’s NYC Terrace</h1>
<h3 class="subtitle subtitle-HEEcLo" dir="auto">What the food policy expert is growing in Greenwich Village.</h3>
<h3 class="subtitle subtitle-HEEcLo" dir="auto"><a class="pencraft pc-reset decoration-hover-underline-ClDVRM reset-IxiVJZ" style="font-size: 16px" href="https://substack.com/@erinweinger">Erin Weinger</a></h3>
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-flexDirection-column pc-paddingBottom-16 pc-reset" role="region" aria-label="Post UFI">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-paddingTop-16 pc-paddingBottom-16 pc-justifyContent-space-between pc-alignItems-center pc-reset">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-gap-12 pc-alignItems-center pc-reset byline-wrapper">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-flexDirection-column pc-reset">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-gap-4 pc-reset">
<div class="pencraft pc-reset color-pub-secondary-text-hGQ02T line-height-20-t4M0El font-meta-MWBumP size-11-NuY2Zx weight-medium-fw81nC transform-uppercase-yKDgcq reset-IxiVJZ meta-EgzBVA">Jun 13, 2026</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="dropCap-hcUVpW">
<div class="available-content">
<div class="body markup" dir="auto">
<div class="captioned-image-container">
<figure>
<div class="image2-inset">
<p><img decoding="async" class="sizing-normal" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!2tFt!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fdc472bcb-d0ae-4288-aab7-ee69c4e036e2_840x600.png" alt="" width="652" data-attrs='{"src":"https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/dc472bcb-d0ae-4288-aab7-ee69c4e036e2_840x600.png","srcNoWatermark":null,"fullscreen":null,"imageSize":null,"height":600,"width":840,"resizeWidth":652,"bytes":1127866,"alt":null,"title":null,"type":"image/png","href":null,"belowTheFold":false,"topImage":true,"internalRedirect":"https://erinweinger.substack.com/i/201710866?img=https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fdc472bcb-d0ae-4288-aab7-ee69c4e036e2_840x600.png","isProcessing":false,"align":null,"offset":false}' style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></p>
<div class="image-link-expand">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-gap-8 pc-reset"></div>
</div>
</div><figcaption class="image-caption"><strong>Green Thumb:</strong> Dr. Marion Nestle in her New York terrace garden on June 11, 2026 (all photos courtesy of the subject).</figcaption></figure>
</div>
<p>Welcome to this installment of <em><a href="https://erinweinger.substack.com/t/field-trip">Field Trip</a></em>, our series that goes inside gardens and farms across the globe and spotlights the interesting people who keep them alive. Today we’re talking to nutritionist and food policy expert Marion Nestle about her gorgeous Greenwich Village terrace garden.</p>
<div class="captioned-image-container">
<figure>
<div class="image2-inset">
<p><img decoding="async" class="sizing-normal" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!v8a7!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F3a76fb12-f383-42fd-adf3-81674d33f9b6_1010x186.png" alt="" width="558" data-attrs='{"src":"https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/3a76fb12-f383-42fd-adf3-81674d33f9b6_1010x186.png","srcNoWatermark":null,"fullscreen":null,"imageSize":null,"height":186,"width":1010,"resizeWidth":558,"bytes":36730,"alt":null,"title":null,"type":"image/png","href":null,"belowTheFold":false,"topImage":false,"internalRedirect":"https://erinweinger.substack.com/i/201710866?img=https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F3a76fb12-f383-42fd-adf3-81674d33f9b6_1010x186.png","isProcessing":false,"align":null,"offset":false}' style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></p>
<div></div>
</div>
</figure>
</div>
<p>When I emailed <a href="https://steinhardt.nyu.edu/people/marion-nestle">Marion Nestle</a>, I didn’t think she’d respond. After all, the 89 year-old nutritionist is arguably the nation’s foremost expert on food policy, has a <a href="https://www.ucpress.edu/books/sugar-coated/hardcover">new book</a> coming out in September (her 17th) and is readying to appear at the <a href="https://www.aspenideas.org/speakers/marion-nestle">Aspen Ideas Festival </a>on June 30, where she’ll speak on a “wellness” panel with Casey Means, RFK’s withdrawn pick for surgeon general (it’s fair to say that Nestle and Means have more than a few differing views). She’s been on advisory boards and committees for the FDA, USDA and American Cancer Society, to name a few. She’s a public health advocate and an outspoken critic against the corporate lobbying, regulatory loopholes and deceptive marketing practices that cause Americans — especially ones with fewer financial resources — to get and stay stuck in a cycle of poor health. She also updates her own website, <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/">Food Politics</a>, with articles and links to new research almost daily.</p>
<p>I first heard of Dr. Nestle back in 2004 when she appeared in <em>Super Size Me, </em>the documentary that followed filmmaker Morgan Spurlock as he exclusively ate McDonalds for 30 days. She was warm and funny and talked about nutrition and the fast food marketing machine in a clear, no bullshit way that let viewers know just how truly knowledgeable she was in her area of expertise. It resonated.</p>
<p>Around this time I was a chubby college kid eating late night cheesy bread slathered in packets of ranch and butter sauce (sometimes as both a late night, post-imbibement snack and again in the morning for breakfast, when it obviously tastes even better). So when I eventually started to prioritize actually feeling good in my body, Dr. Nestle’s philosophy on eating a wide variety of largely plant-based whole unprocessed foods felt incredibly simple and quite rational. Back then, eating “clean” — i.e. organic fruits and vegetables, lean protein, food containing ingredients you could recognize and pronounce — wasn’t a fad (fad diets, unsurprisingly, are not something Dr. Nestle has much patience for). Today, I have a copy of <em>What to Eat Now, </em>Dr. Nestle’s landmark 2006 book that was updated and re-released last fall, sitting on my bedside table.</p>
<figure class="gallery-Phxj1j" data-drag-handle="true" data-component-name="ImageGallery">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-flexDirection-column pc-gap-8 pc-reset">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-gap-8 pc-reset imageRow-_Y6x8T length-2-inHdHY"><img decoding="async" class="img-OACg1c image-IE_pDY medium-ZeIdEU zoom-YdDT6p pencraft pc-reset pressable-lg-kV7yq8 pencraft pc-reset" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!UOai!,w_720,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F65d0bc26-3d09-404c-81c0-f4c4d2c9654c_4032x3024.jpeg" alt="" width="720" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"><img decoding="async" class="img-OACg1c image-IE_pDY medium-ZeIdEU zoom-YdDT6p pencraft pc-reset pressable-lg-kV7yq8 pencraft pc-reset" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!qVlT!,w_720,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2b9ff211-69a5-4f1a-aacf-f90321270fd7_4032x3024.jpeg" alt="" width="720" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></div>
</div>
</figure>
<p> </p>
<p>So again, I didn’t think I’d hear back when I reached out to ask if Dr. Nestle would tell me more about the terrace garden she keeps in New York, which she’d mentioned in passing in a <em>Washington Post</em> <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/wellness/2025/11/05/marion-nestle-what-she-eats/">article</a> I read last year promoting her book. I’ve been thinking about her and her terrace ever since.</p>
<p>But she did respond. And she did so with the exact same gusto and warmth she seems to convey in her writing and her <a href="https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/maha-report-not-about-actions-food-policy-expert-says">media appearances</a>. “I would be delighted,” she wrote, before letting me know that work was soon starting on her Manhattan apartment building and that the garden photo shoot would have to happen right away. Pictures of Dr. Nestle radiating joy amid her terrace greenery followed almost immediately.</p>
<p>Below, Dr. Nestle dives into her gardening philosophy (“<em>effortless</em>”), how she’s created a productive plot of land in the middle of New York City, and the biggest thing she’s splurged on for her lush outdoor space.</p>
<div class="captioned-image-container">
<figure>
<div class="image2-inset">
<p><img decoding="async" class="sizing-normal" title="" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!v8a7!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F3a76fb12-f383-42fd-adf3-81674d33f9b6_1010x186.png" alt="" width="558" data-attrs='{"src":"https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/3a76fb12-f383-42fd-adf3-81674d33f9b6_1010x186.png","srcNoWatermark":null,"fullscreen":null,"imageSize":null,"height":186,"width":1010,"resizeWidth":558,"bytes":36730,"alt":"","title":null,"type":"image/png","href":null,"belowTheFold":true,"topImage":false,"internalRedirect":"https://erinweinger.substack.com/i/201710866?img=https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F3a76fb12-f383-42fd-adf3-81674d33f9b6_1010x186.png","isProcessing":false,"align":null,"offset":false}' style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></p>
<div></div>
</div>
</figure>
</div>
<p><strong>Your terrace is gorgeous — an oasis in the city! What part of Manhattan are you growing your garden in?</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>Marion Nestle:</strong> Greenwich Village on the edge of NoHo on the 12<sup>th</sup> floor of a landmarked building built in 1931. The apartment was <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/02/how-i-ended-up-living-in-ed-kochs-famous-greenwich-village-apartment/273078/">formerly occupied by Congressman and Mayor Ed Koch</a>. I moved in when he lost the election and moved to a tonier building.</em></p>
<p><strong>Tell me a little about what’s out there. I see <a href="https://erinweinger.substack.com/p/invasive-mint-is-ruining-my-life">herbs</a>, Sweet Williams, and a Japanese Maple among so many other plants. What are some of the other plants and flowers you have at the moment?</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>M.N.</strong> When I first moved in, I had a view up to 53<sup>rd</sup> street, but now I have a bunch of evergreens to block my current view of the building that blocked it. I try to grow as much food as possible, and have dwarf sour cherry and peach trees, blueberries, raspberries, strawberries, Cayuga White grapes, lettuce, tomatoes, <a href="https://erinweinger.substack.com/p/invasive-mint-is-ruining-my-life">basil, rosemary, cilantro, parsley, and oregano</a>. I’ve got daylilies, dianthus, and azaleas. I love <a href="https://www.massaudubon.org/nature-wildlife/invasive-plants-in-massachusetts/purple-loosestrife">loosestrife</a> and put some in and now I know why everyone is afraid of it; it has seeded practically every pot and is a big weeding chore. And then the vines: ivy growing up the walls for my neighbors to enjoy, and two kinds of honeysuckle. Several of the trees are volunteers—the hawthorn, for example, and the tall weedy ones. The ivy also makes prolific seeds that sprout everywhere.</em></p>
<figure class="gallery-Phxj1j" data-drag-handle="true" data-component-name="ImageGallery">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-flexDirection-column pc-gap-8 pc-reset">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-gap-8 pc-reset imageRow-_Y6x8T"><img decoding="async" class="img-OACg1c image-IE_pDY small-AA4Dt8 zoom-YdDT6p pencraft pc-reset pressable-lg-kV7yq8 pencraft pc-reset" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!cO4r!,w_474,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F26d5c13f-71d7-442e-b45a-81d88da4643f_4032x3024.jpeg" alt="" width="474" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"><img decoding="async" class="img-OACg1c image-IE_pDY small-AA4Dt8 zoom-YdDT6p pencraft pc-reset pressable-lg-kV7yq8 pencraft pc-reset" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!roFQ!,w_474,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd62e7ac9-8225-446a-b744-a46def41c161_4032x3024.jpeg" alt="" width="474" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"><img decoding="async" class="img-OACg1c image-IE_pDY small-AA4Dt8 zoom-YdDT6p pencraft pc-reset pressable-lg-kV7yq8 pencraft pc-reset" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!TnMl!,w_474,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F8afdbb26-5c3e-434f-ab3c-bc2cef6ceab9_4032x3024.jpeg" alt="" width="474" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></div>
</div>
</figure>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>I’d love to know a bit of the history and evolution of the garden. Did you have any help with the planning or did you do it yourself?</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>M.N.</strong> As should be obvious, I like messy, overgrown gardens. When I first moved in, the super said no plants on the terrace. At the time, it was covered with beautiful Mexican tiles. I wrote a lengthy petition and promised to keep all pots off the tiles, and that’s how it started. It’s evolved over the years, especially after the times the building has to be pointed; the city requires checking for loose bricks every 5-10 years. When that happens, everything goes off the terrace and the equipment goes on it, usually for months. When they are done, I start over.</em></p>
<p><strong>Is this your first garden?</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>M.N.</strong> I’ve always had gardens whenever I could. This dates back to a summer camp in Vermont that had a fabulous kitchen garden along with wild berries everywhere.</em></p>
<p><strong>What is upkeep like? How much time and maintenance does it require? I’d also love to know a little about your gardening routine — do you listen to music or podcasts when you garden?</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>M.N.</strong> None of the above. It’s effortless except for getting it going in the spring when I clean out the hanging boxes of mixed annuals and perennials. After that, everything is on its own. I just weed, <a href="https://erinweinger.substack.com/p/what-does-going-to-seed-mean">pinch</a>, and harvest. Everything is in pots. They stay out in the winter and either survive or not. Nothing comes in. They are on their own. There used to be two terrific plant stores within easy walking distance but both have closed so whatever <a href="https://erinweinger.substack.com/p/im-a-native-plant-gardener-now">plants I buy</a> come from the Union Square farmers market or from online stores.</em></p>
<p><em>I travel a lot and what makes this all possible is a fabulous computerized watering system managed by a really competent company. They turn the system on in the spring and off in the winter and check it all several times in the summer. I can leave anytime and not worry about it.</em></p>
<figure class="gallery-Phxj1j" data-drag-handle="true" data-component-name="ImageGallery">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-flexDirection-column pc-gap-8 pc-reset">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-gap-8 pc-reset imageRow-_Y6x8T"><img decoding="async" class="img-OACg1c image-IE_pDY small-AA4Dt8 zoom-YdDT6p pencraft pc-reset pressable-lg-kV7yq8 pencraft pc-reset" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!uOEQ!,w_474,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F3a621871-6827-46c7-a28b-b5b718f844fc_4032x3024.jpeg" alt="" width="474" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"><img decoding="async" class="img-OACg1c image-IE_pDY small-AA4Dt8 zoom-YdDT6p pencraft pc-reset pressable-lg-kV7yq8 pencraft pc-reset" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!e6ig!,w_474,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbb761bfa-d5f4-475c-86ce-708d5381144a_4032x3024.jpeg" alt="" width="474" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"><img decoding="async" class="img-OACg1c image-IE_pDY small-AA4Dt8 zoom-YdDT6p pencraft pc-reset pressable-lg-kV7yq8 pencraft pc-reset" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!OQXs!,w_474,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fca64cbc1-4573-4f6f-84a2-6757a63321ac_4032x3024.jpeg" alt="" width="474" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></div>
</div>
</figure>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>What got me most excited to talk to you — given your line of work, expertise, and areas of advocacy — are the edible portions of your garden. How do you use the edible things you grow, and how do those things contribute to you being able to eat the way you want? Personally, I started my first herb garden because I wanted to have chives, cilantro and <a href="https://erinweinger.substack.com/p/what-does-going-to-seed-mean">basil</a> on hand for my favorite white bean dish that I cook and I didn’t want to have to buy herbs in plastic clamshells. I’m curious if there’s any one meal, dish, etc. that inspired you to start growing your own food.</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>M.N.</strong> Let’s be real. My cherry tree produced three tiny jars of jam. I do go out and pick the berries for breakfast during the weeks they are in fruit, and I pick the lettuce for salads, but we are talking about food for one here.</em></p>
<p><strong>I just read the <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/food-safety-in-peril-a-post-from-bill-marler/">guest post</a> on your website about our current food safety crisis due to government cuts (I have been nervous more than once in the last year and a half to eat “triple washed” bagged organic spinach et al). What can we do at home, if anything, to help reduce our risk a bit? How can our gardens play a part in that solve?</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>M.N.</strong> Wash your veggies! Garden vegetables are much less likely to be contaminated with pathogens than industrially produced chopped salad mixes.</em></p>
<p><strong>I’m not sure how intense the pests are in New York City. But can you suggest any natural pest-control methods that a home gardener should use to ensure they’re not spraying or using pesticides on their crops?</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>M.N.</strong> As I said, my plants are on their own. I had a bad problem with lily bugs this year and didn’t get any regular lilies. The daylilies were OK. Sometimes I will bring in a tomato plant that comes with hornworms. They have to be picked off by hand. Another advantage of a 12<sup>th</sup> floor garden: I don’t have to worry about deer or rabbits.</em></p>
<figure class="gallery-Phxj1j" data-drag-handle="true" data-component-name="ImageGallery">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-flexDirection-column pc-gap-8 pc-reset">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-gap-8 pc-reset imageRow-_Y6x8T"><img decoding="async" class="img-OACg1c image-IE_pDY small-AA4Dt8 zoom-YdDT6p pencraft pc-reset pressable-lg-kV7yq8 pencraft pc-reset" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!kiNs!,w_474,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4d59418d-586f-40b9-8363-9dfda2e5561e_4032x3024.jpeg" alt="" width="474" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"><img decoding="async" class="img-OACg1c image-IE_pDY small-AA4Dt8 zoom-YdDT6p pencraft pc-reset pressable-lg-kV7yq8 pencraft pc-reset" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!zKVZ!,w_474,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0810c3ef-4d04-4f0d-acc9-3ad89f5132df_4032x3024.jpeg" alt="" width="474" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"><img decoding="async" class="img-OACg1c image-IE_pDY small-AA4Dt8 zoom-YdDT6p pencraft pc-reset pressable-lg-kV7yq8 pencraft pc-reset" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!p9W9!,w_474,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F69abf8a3-1e89-4a87-b749-795484a6baeb_4032x3024.jpeg" alt="" width="474" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></div>
</div>
</figure>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>From a nutrition perspective, are there any specific fruits and vegetables that you wish more people had on hand in their gardens? What are some powerhouses that we should all try to grow and grab to impact our day-to-day eating habits in a positive way?</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>M.N.</strong> I’m an omnivore. All fruits and vegetables have nutritional benefits. I vote for growing the ones you like best.</em></p>
<p><strong>I think people who have never before grown their own food are scared to do it if they don’t have “space.” But you’re proving that you don’t need a huge yard or farm to get started. What advice would you have for someone who may have a terrace or balcony? Where should they start?</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>M.N.</strong> Salads are easy. Put in a few lettuce plants. Radishes! I can only grow cherry tomatoes on my terrace; the big ones don’t work. Plants need soil, light, and water. Experiment!</em></p>
<div class="captioned-image-container">
<figure>
<div class="image2-inset">
<p><img decoding="async" class="sizing-normal" src="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!NJwO!,w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F8d3e94e0-d2ee-44e1-adc5-32ac94d62101_1096x1412.png" alt="" width="386" data-attrs='{"src":"https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/8d3e94e0-d2ee-44e1-adc5-32ac94d62101_1096x1412.png","srcNoWatermark":null,"fullscreen":null,"imageSize":null,"height":1412,"width":1096,"resizeWidth":386,"bytes":3862654,"alt":null,"title":null,"type":"image/png","href":null,"belowTheFold":true,"topImage":false,"internalRedirect":"https://erinweinger.substack.com/i/201710866?img=https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F8d3e94e0-d2ee-44e1-adc5-32ac94d62101_1096x1412.png","isProcessing":false,"align":null,"offset":false}' style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></p>
<div class="image-link-expand">
<div class="pencraft pc-display-flex pc-gap-8 pc-reset"></div>
</div>
</div>
</figure>
</div>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>What gardening wisdom do you wish you knew when you were just beginning?</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>M.N.</strong> I don’t consider myself a particularly wise gardener. I mostly let the plants do their thing and try to keep the weeds to a minimum. If I get the light right, they will grow. I like to start with small plants and see how they do. That tall elm tree was given to me as a small shoot; the azaleas were from supermarkets; I brought the white pine in a 4 inch pot from New Hampshire. I don’t spend much money on it, except for the watering system—my one gardening luxury.</em></p>
<p>Share this post with someone who loves plants. You know you want to. <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f331.png" alt="🌱" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /><button class="pencraft pc-reset pencraft rightButton primary subscribe-btn button-VFSdkv buttonBase-GK1x3M" type="submit"></button></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</article>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/guest-post-a-visit-to-my-manhattan-terrace/">Guest post: A visit to my Manhattan terrace</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28624</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekend reading: Flagstaff anti-hunger efforts</title>
		<link>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/weekend-reading-flagstaff-anti-hunger-efforts/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 13:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food-security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunger]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=28556</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In September 2025, I was invited by the Flagstaff Family Food Center to give a talk on “Anti-Hunger Politics 2025: Planting Seeds for Resilience.”  This is an organization in Northern Arizona doing outstanding anti-hunger work. The Center has just produced its 2025 Northern Arizona Food Equity Report.  The online copy is here.  It is well worth [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/weekend-reading-flagstaff-anti-hunger-efforts/">Weekend reading: Flagstaff anti-hunger efforts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In September 2025, I was invited by the <a href="https://hotfood.org/news/">Flagstaff Family Food Center</a> to give a talk on “Anti-Hunger Politics 2025: Planting Seeds for Resilience.”  This is an organization in Northern Arizona doing outstanding anti-hunger work.</p>
<p>The Center has just produced its <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/FFFC_2025_Food-Report_FINAL.pdf">2025 Northern Arizona Food Equity Report</a>.  The <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__hotfood.org_news_-23-5Ffood-2Dequity-2Dreport&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=9wlQNXe-kaL03Rz7FThY74uIt9ZuLQ8Y8-nSFvQCYelfEGeEqPkVQKDg2iFGfJZA&amp;s=RgQ3CeBaG1O4qIwTxGlgSmJRLnK5UhaMxkqCLjdgH0o&amp;e=">online copy is here.</a>  It is well worth a look.</p>
<p>The Center sent this to me with this message:</p>
<blockquote><p>We hope this resource can serve as a resource for multiple stakeholders across the food landscape, like you. Data and lived experience should always be the guiding light in this work, and we are proud to be part of a community that shares that sentiment and helps carry it out.</p></blockquote>
<p>I wrote the Foreword to the report (see page 4).  Here’s what I said—and I meant every word:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is my honor and privilege to introduce the impressive and utterly compelling<br>
2025 Northern Arizona Food Equity Report. The Flagstaff Family Food<br>
Center (FFFC) has done a superb job of collecting what must have been<br>
incredibly hard-to-get data on hunger and food insecurity in the rural and<br>
tribal communities it serves.</p>
<p>These data reveal a shocking truth: many people—even those working full- or<br>
part-time—lack sufficient resources to feed themselves and their families<br>
and require government and private food assistance to survive. Even working<br>
people cannot keep up with the rising costs of housing, rent, utilities, and food.</p>
<p>Today, government food assistance programs like SNAP and WIC are under<br>
siege and targeted for cuts, not increases. Private groups like FFFC do the<br>
best they can to fill the gaps and meet the ever-increasing demands for<br>
food assistance, especially from the most vulnerable members of society-<br>
-children, the disabled, and seniors.</p>
<p>This report presents the stark facts: too many Northern Arizona residents<br>
experience food insecurity, and their numbers are rising. It explains the<br>
reasons for food insecurity, particularly for these communities, and draws on<br>
the lived experience of community members to describe why this problem<br>
requires an immediate solution. It describes potential policy solutions, and<br>
the reality-based barriers to achieving them. And it presents this critically<br>
important information without ever losing sight of the cultural context in<br>
which food insecurity occurs in Northern Arizona.</p>
<p>These are tough times in America. Northern Arizona is fortunate to have a<br>
group like the FFFC doing the hard work and clear thinking needed to solve<br>
some of the most difficult problems facing our society today.</p></blockquote>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/weekend-reading-flagstaff-anti-hunger-efforts/">Weekend reading: Flagstaff anti-hunger efforts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28556</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do salmon really get high on cocaine? And will you if you eat it?</title>
		<link>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/28578/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=28578</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I was riveted to come across this item. Coked-Up Salmon Go Speeding Upstream: Have you ever wondered whether the cocaine you snort ends up giving Atlantic salmon the zoomies? It turns out it does—at least to a certain extent. Welcome to the Salmonopolis 500. No.  It never entered my mind. But now there is a study:  Cocaine [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/28578/">Do salmon really get high on cocaine? And will you if you eat it?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was riveted to come across this item.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="https://www.acsh.org/news/2026/05/05/coked-salmon-go-speeding-upstream-50083"><strong>Coked-Up Salmon Go Speeding Upstream</strong>: </a>Have you ever wondered whether the cocaine you snort ends up giving Atlantic salmon the zoomies? It turns out it does—at least to a certain extent. Welcome to the Salmonopolis 500.</p></blockquote>
<p>No.  It never entered my mind.</p>
<p>But now there is a study:  <a href="https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(26)00315-5">Cocaine pollution alters the movement and space use of Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>) in a large natural lake</a> [Current Biology, 36, 2018-2027.e4]</p>
<blockquote><p>Here, we combine slow-release chemical implants with acoustic telemetry tracking to reveal how environmentally realistic levels of cocaine and its main metabolite, benzoylecgonine, affect the movement of Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>) smolts in a large natural lake (Lake Vättern, Sweden). Benzoylecgonine exposure increased weekly movement rates of fish in the wild, with exposed fish swimming up to ∼1.9 times farther per week relative to controls. In addition, benzoylecgonine-exposed fish dispersed up to ∼12.3 km farther than control conspecifics.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh.  They put the cocaine into the fish.  Not a natural experiment.</p>
<p>But here’s another study, examining drugs in the natural environment: <a href="https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2113947119">Pharmaceutical pollution of the world’s rivers </a> [PNAS:119 (8) e2113947119. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113947119">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113947119]</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Here, we present the findings of a global reconnaissance of pharmaceutical pollution in rivers. The study monitored 1,052 sampling sites along 258 rivers in 104 countries of all continents, thus representing the pharmaceutical fingerprint of 471.4 million people. We show that the presence of these contaminants in surface water poses a threat to environmental and/or human health in more than a quarter of the studied locations globally.</p></blockquote>
<div class="doi"></div>
<p>Cocaine did not show up as a major contaminant in this study.  Tylenol does; it is #1.</p>
<blockquote><p>The contaminants with the highest concentrations were paracetamol, caffeine, metformin, fexofenadine, sulfamethoxazole (antimicrobial), metronidazole (antimicrobial), and gabapentin</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Comment</strong></p>
<p>We take a lot of Tylenol and drink a lot of coffee, explaining the two drugs most frequently found in this study.  Lots of people take metformin for type 2 diabetes.  The more drugs we take, the more we pee out, and the more gets into rivers.</p>
<p>The investigators found huge socioeconomic inequities in drug contamination.  There were drugs <em>everywhere</em> they sampled, even in Antarctica, but the highest levels were in low- and middle-income countries with unregulated pharmaceutical manufacturing plants, untreated sewage, and waste dumping.</p>
<p>Rivers with the lowest drug contamination were in remote areas with few people or those with access to modern medicine, were in places with effective wastewater treatment, or had so much flow that the drugs got diluted.</p>
<p>I’m not worried about cocaine in salmon.  And I live in New York City which has outstanding water treatment.</p>
<p>Otherwise?  Get a good filter.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/28578/">Do salmon really get high on cocaine? And will you if you eat it?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28578</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>A MAHA Win?  Trix without petroleum dyes</title>
		<link>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/a-maha-win-trix-without-petroleum-dyes/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Additives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cereals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food-colors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=28574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>My forthcoming (September 8) book with Lisa Sutherland, Sugar Coated: Unboxing the Hidden Forces Shaping America’s Favorite Breakfast Food, discusses Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) efforts to remove potentially harmful artificial colors from the food supply. I just bought the first cereal that dropped those colors and replaced them with vegetable dyes. The company did [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/a-maha-win-trix-without-petroleum-dyes/">A MAHA Win?  Trix without petroleum dyes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My forthcoming (September 8) book with Lisa Sutherland, <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/05/official-announcement-sugar-coated/">Sugar Coated: Unboxing the Hidden Forces Shaping America’s Favorite Breakfast Food, </a>discusses Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) efforts to remove potentially harmful artificial colors from the food supply.</p>
<p>I just bought the first cereal that dropped those colors and replaced them with vegetable dyes.</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-28575" src="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/Screenshot-2026-06-06-112257.png" alt="" width="277" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></p>
<p>The company did this quietly.  I had to look hard to find the green label in the upper right corner saying “colors from natural sources.”  Compare the colors of the cereal (pretty close to what it actually looks like) to the original Trix colors, still on the market.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignnone wp-image-28576" src="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/Screenshot-2026-06-06-112324.png" alt="" width="343" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></p>
<p>As for the cereals, both:</p>
<ul>
<li>Are ultra-processed</li>
<li>Have artificial flavors and other chemical additives</li>
<li>Contain 12 grams of sugars per serving</li>
<li>Contain only 1 gram of fiber</li>
</ul>
<h3><span style="color: #ff0000"><strong>Trix <span style="text-decoration: underline">without</span> artificial colors</strong></span></h3>
<blockquote><p>Whole Grain Corn, Sugar, Corn Meal, Corn Syrup, Maltodextrin, Rice Flour, Canola And/Or Sunflower Oil, Salt, Color (Vegetable And Fruit Juice, <span style="color: #ff0000"><strong>Annatto Extract, Turmeric Extract And Other Color Added</strong></span>), Natural And Artificial Flavor, Trisodium Phosphate, Citric Acid, Malic Acid, Rosemary Extract. Vitamins And Minerals</p></blockquote>
<h3><span style="color: #ff0000"><strong>Trix original, <span style="text-decoration: underline">with</span> artificial colors</strong></span></h3>
<div id="mobileTarget" class="mainContainer">
<div class="siteContainer">
<div id="content" class="contentContainer clearfix">
<div>
<div id="pdpPage" class="">
<div id="productInfo">
<div id="bottomContainer">
<div id="accordion">
<div class="pdpContainer">
<div class="rightSection">
<div id="NutritionIngredients" class="pdpSection">
<div class="pdpCard ingredientAllergenCard">
<div class="cardBody">
<blockquote>
<p class="cardText" data-bind="text: ingredientStatementTxt">Whole Grain Corn, Sugar, Rice Flour, Corn Syrup, Canola and/or Sunflower Oil, Salt, Trisodium Phosphate, Natural and Artificial Flavor, <span style="color: #ff0000"><strong>Red 40, Yellow 6, Blue 1 and Other Color Added</strong></span>, Citric Acid, Malic Acid, Rosemary Extract. Vitamins and Minerals</p>
</blockquote>
<p data-bind="text: ingredientStatementTxt"><strong>Comment</strong></p>
<p data-bind="text: ingredientStatementTxt">Removing the artificial dyes is a good idea, but does not convert Trix to a health food.  Alas.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/a-maha-win-trix-without-petroleum-dyes/">A MAHA Win?  Trix without petroleum dyes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28574</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Food safety in peril: a post from Bill Marler</title>
		<link>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/food-safety-in-peril-a-post-from-bill-marler/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 13:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill-Marler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food-safety]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=28579</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I don’t usually host guest posts here, but I read food safety lawyer Bill Marler’s blog and obtained his permission to reprint it.  It should be obvious why I thought you should read it. We’re Turning Off the Smoke Detectors on America’s Food Supply By Bill Marler on June 6, 2026 Posted in Case News The people who find [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/food-safety-in-peril-a-post-from-bill-marler/">Food safety in peril: a post from Bill Marler</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t usually host guest posts here, but I read food safety lawyer Bill Marler’s blog and obtained his permission to reprint it.  It should be obvious why I thought you should read it.</p>
<header class="lxb_af-post_header lxb_af-grid-parade" role="presentation">
<h1 class="lxb_af-template_tags-get_post_title"><a href="https://www.marlerblog.com/case-news/were-turning-off-the-smoke-detectors-on-americas-food-supply/">We’re Turning Off the Smoke Detectors on America’s Food Supply</a></h1>
<div class="lxb_af-post_header-meta">
<div class="lxb_af-post_header-meta-byline_cat_wrap">
<div class="lxb_af-template_tags-get_post_byline lxb_af-post_meta">By <span class="lxb_af-template_tags-get_authors lxb_af-template_tags-get_authors-get_linked_author_names lxb_af-template_tags-get_authors-get_linked_author_names-get_post_byline-authors"><a class="lxb_af-template_tags-get_author lxb_af-template_tags-get_author-get_authors-author" href="http://www.marlerclark.com/lawyers/view/william-marler" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Bill Marler</a></span> on <time class="lxb_af-template_tags-get_post_date lxb_af-template_tags-get_post_date-get_post_byline-date" datetime="2026-06-06 12:00">June 6, 2026</time></div>
<div class="lxb_af-template_tags-get_post_categories lxb_af-hide_from_print lxb_af-post_meta">Posted in <a class="lxb_af-template_tags-get_post_categories-link lxb_af-post_meta-link" href="https://www.marlerblog.com/articles/case-news/">Case News</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</header>
<div class="lxb_af-post_content lxb_af-clear">
<figure class="wp-block-image aligncenter size-large"><img decoding="async" class="wp-image-46047" src="https://www.marlerblog.com/files/2026/06/bmarler_Were_Turning_Off_the_Smoke_Detectors_on_Americas_Food_203bb8fd-32d5-44dc-a844-e4596414de22_1-640x482.png" alt="" width="640" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></figure>
<p><strong><em>The people who find foodborne outbreaks are being fired, defunded, and disbanded — and the bugs do not care.</em></strong></p>
<p>For more than thirty years I have represented the families on the other end of a foodborne outbreak — the parents of children on dialysis with hemolytic uremic syndrome, the survivors of a contaminated hamburger or a bag of spinach, the people left planning funerals. I built a career holding companies accountable when the food safety system failed. I never imagined the federal government itself would become one of the things that fails. Over the past year and a half, it has.</p>
<p>The cuts this administration has made to the FDA, the CDC, and the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service are not abstract budget lines. They are going to get people sick, and some of them are going to die. The cruelest part is that it is all being done under a banner that reads “Make America Healthy Again.”</p>
<p>Consider the FDA, which polices roughly 80 percent of our food. It lost nearly 3,900 employees in 2025 alone, part of an HHS purge of some 20,000 jobs. It began in February with what the agency’s own deputy commissioner for human foods called the “indiscriminate” firing of 89 people from the food program — after which he resigned, saying it was “fruitless” to continue. The administration fired so blindly that it had to scramble to rehire the official in charge of infant formula safety.</p>
<p>By March, HHS planned to cut a fifth of the FDA’s workforce, including more than 170 people from inspections and investigations. Understand what that means. In 2024 the FDA had all of 443 inspectors to cover more than 36,000 food facilities at home and abroad — against the roughly 1,500 it says it actually needs. We were already running on fumes. ProPublica found that foreign food inspections fell by nearly half in early 2025. We are importing more food than ever and looking at less of it.</p>
<p>Then there is the surveillance — the quiet, unglamorous detective work that is the entire ballgame in my world. By the time a family calls me, public health investigators have usually already connected a sick child in Ohio to a sick adult in Oregon and traced both to a single contaminated lot. On July 1, the CDC gutted that capacity, scaling its FoodNet surveillance network back from eight pathogens to two. It stopped actively tracking Campylobacter, Listeria, and four others. Listeria — the same pathogen that, in the Boar’s Head outbreak just last year, caused the deadliest listeriosis outbreak in over a decade. We are turning off the smoke detectors and telling ourselves the house won’t burn.</p>
<p>The USDA has done its part. Its inspection service shed hundreds of positions while line speeds at some slaughterhouses climb and inspectors step back — fewer people asked to catch more contamination moving faster. And in a move that should alarm anyone who believes in evidence, the department disbanded the two scientific advisory committees that had guided federal food safety policy for decades, one of them since 1971. Their combined cost was about $300,000 a year. One was, at the moment it was dissolved, reviewing how to keep Listeria out of deli meat. That work simply stopped. For good measure, FSIS withdrew its proposed rule to limit Salmonella in raw poultry — a pathogen that sickens more than a million Americans a year — after years of work.</p>
<p>I want to be fair. No one in Washington woke up wanting to poison a child, and the food safety system was underfunded long before this administration; I have said so under presidents of both parties. But you cannot fire the inspectors, blind the surveillance, suspend the lab testing, dismiss the scientists, and abandon the rule making all at once and still claim that food safety is a priority. Actions are what count, and these all point one direction.</p>
<p>Here is what three decades have taught me. Outbreaks do not announce themselves. They are found by people — inspectors who walk the plants, epidemiologists who connect the dots, technicians who confirm the strain. Take those people away and the outbreaks still come. We just find them later, after more children are on dialysis and more families are planning funerals instead of birthday parties. The bacteria do not care about budget cuts. They never have.</p>
<p>I have spent my life suing companies that put profit ahead of safety. If these cuts stand, I expect to be busier than ever. That is the worst thing I could possibly tell you.</p>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/food-safety-in-peril-a-post-from-bill-marler/">Food safety in peril: a post from Bill Marler</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28579</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The wonders of AI: a cubist portrait</title>
		<link>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/the-wonders-of-ai-a-portrait/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 13:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI--Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=28571</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week on my way home from the Washington, DC, launch of the ultra-processed papers from the American Journal of Public Health, I was corresponding with Richard McCarthy (Think Like Pirates) about our mutual sadness about the death of Slow Food founder, Carlo Petrini. Richard said our conversation inspired him to ask the free ChatGBT to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/the-wonders-of-ai-a-portrait/">The wonders of AI: a cubist portrait</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week on my way home from the <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/public-health-series-on-ultraprocessed-foods-my-editorial/">Washington, DC, launch</a> of the ultra-processed papers from the American Journal of Public Health, I was corresponding with Richard McCarthy (<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.thinklikepirates.com_&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=OaDVYEQE-ClD7yKyfU7J0Q-L6I9Z4PmHpzpX-2GFuPW6LYwYEWtV4v4ToJiCAySI&amp;s=A-teG7B41lg3EQ0LWbDNKljwYGBe-vPPzAVgMwerZ9M&amp;e=">Think Like Pirates) </a>about our mutual sadness about the <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/05/rip-carlo-petrini-a-huge-loss-to-the-food-world-and-to-humanity/">death of Slow Food founder, Carlo Petrini</a>.</p>
<p>Richard said our conversation inspired him to ask the free ChatGBT to produce this portrait.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-28573" src="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/AI-portrait-560x448.png" alt="" width="560" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></p>
<p>I absolutely love it and wish I looked like that.</p>
<p>I’m trying to figure out how to use it.  Suggestions welcome.</p>
<p>Thanks Richard (and AI)!</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/the-wonders-of-ai-a-portrait/">The wonders of AI: a cubist portrait</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28571</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekend reading: IPES-Food&#8217;s report on the New Geopolitics of Food</title>
		<link>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/weekend-reading-ipes-foods-report-on-the-new-geopolitics-of-food/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 13:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food-supply]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=28554</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems has released its latest report, The New Geopolitics of Food: Navigating policies for resilient self-reliance. The report focuses on how “how wars, trade disputes, aid cuts, climate shocks, and weakening international cooperation are pushing up food prices, deepening hunger, and reshaping global food security.” It draws on [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/weekend-reading-ipes-foods-report-on-the-new-geopolitics-of-food/">Weekend reading: IPES-Food&#8217;s report on the New Geopolitics of Food</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems has released its latest report,<a href="https://ipes-food.org/report/the-new-geopolitics-of-food" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong> The New Geopolitics of Food: Navigating policies for resilient self-reliance.</strong></a></div>
<p><a class="" title="" href="https://ipes-food.org/report/the-new-geopolitics-of-food" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img decoding="async" class="mcnImage" src="https://mcusercontent.com/a81ecceada55ac9f7a6344a39/images/940ac2e5-1c10-0cfd-2121-38be024cd603.jpg" alt="" width="564" align="center" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></a></p>
<div>
<p>The report focuses on how “<span style="font-family: source sans pro, helvetica neue, helvetica, arial, sans-serif">how wars, trade disputes, aid cuts, climate shocks, and weakening international cooperation are pushing up food prices, deepening hunger, and reshaping global food security.”</span></p>
<p>It draws on the experience of governments of many countries in attempting to stabilize prices, support farmers, and protect access to food.</p>
<p>The report argues: “<strong>governments must shift towards <em>resilient self-reliance</em>: strengthening domestic and regional food systems, reducing dependence on volatile global markets, and ensuring farmers and communities can weather future shocks</strong>.</p>
<p><span style="font-family: source sans pro, helvetica neue, helvetica, arial, sans-serif">As steps toward food self-reliance, it calls on governments to use the tools they have to stabilize and improve their food supply chains. </span></p>
<p>Good idea.</p>
<p><strong>Resources</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The full report <a href="https://ipes-food.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/NewGeopoliticsOfFood.pdf">is here</a>.</li>
<li>The report summary <a href="https://ipes-food.org/report-summary/the-new-geopolitics-of-food/">is here</a>.</li>
<li>Information about IPES-Food <a href="https://ipes-food.org/our-work/">is here</a>.</li>
<li>Other IPES-Food reports <a href="https://ipes-food.org/our-work/?type=report&amp;types_show=yes&amp;topics=&amp;post_categories=&amp;topics_show=no#our-work-results">are here.</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/weekend-reading-ipes-foods-report-on-the-new-geopolitics-of-food/">Weekend reading: IPES-Food&#8217;s report on the New Geopolitics of Food</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28554</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The eye-rolling protein craze: some thoughts</title>
		<link>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/the-eye-rolling-protein-craze-some-thoughts/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 13:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protein]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=28547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Nutritionists like me cannot understand why people think they need more protein, so much so that the food industry is putting protein into everything. Most Americans consume close to twice the amount of protein needed, and practically anyone who consumes enough calories gets plenty.  Protein is in lots of foods and it’s really hard not [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/the-eye-rolling-protein-craze-some-thoughts/">The eye-rolling protein craze: some thoughts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nutritionists like me cannot understand why people think they need more protein, so much so that the food industry is putting protein into everything.</p>
<p>Most Americans consume close to twice the amount of protein needed, and practically anyone who consumes enough calories gets plenty.  Protein is in lots of foods and it’s really hard not to get enough unless you aren’t eating much.</p>
<p>I’m endlessly entertained by protein in everything, and am tracking its effect on the food industry.</p>
<p>Guess what.  There’s a shortage.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__link.fooddive.com_click_45626825.5110_aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZm9vZGRpdmUuY29tL25ld3MvcHJvdGVpbi1wb3dkZXItc2hvcnRhZ2Utd2hleS1wcmljZXMvODE5NjI1Lw_5a74ced93f92a422b1112646Bd4df7aea&amp;d=DwMCaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=yPBfWdb4iXtMfq-NTKKkn5TLzajDjzyfCVHccbkNtggHuqpZSt3peHrbpfJoS-ZY&amp;s=ihIfx0vhfge90BFBeyjppRfExxUlU0tARkUmgNbPr_k&amp;e=">Protein powder shortage threatens America’s biggest food craze: </a></strong>Companies are now grappling with whether to raise prices at a time when consumers are already reeling from a prolonged period of inflation.</p></blockquote>
<p>The food industry views the protein craze as a growth opportunity.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__t.marketing1.william-2Dreed.com_r_-3Fid-3Dh37ec6ae5-2C49539ec7-2C42d23245-26e-3DY2lkPURNMTI2NTQ2MSZiaWQ9OTM4MjQwNzQx-26s-3D-2DnKaCchsy7tBQ7YflfP8LEWv6lznXrL25WcP7jsEO8U&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=0xSMJbzQLWcLO5fajWd6e2fsoizgu3xwSgc3Da04FRcMlQH-_LTmcrB7WshhAmF4&amp;s=szA9vx9Pikjs9AL4fa226Od8ts00Cglo5sKgpeG4S7A&amp;e="><strong>How protein is shaping active nutrition in 2026:  </strong></a>Sustained demand for protein continues to define the active and performance nutrition space. But where are the growth niches?… <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__t.marketing1.william-2Dreed.com_r_-3Fid-3Dh37ec6ae5-2C49539ec7-2C42d23246-26e-3DY2lkPURNMTI2NTQ2MSZiaWQ9OTM4MjQwNzQx-26s-3D88XVqsLcEDd-5F0rs4U1Fm2mLTZGeNIvaS8etr5yIfv70&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=0xSMJbzQLWcLO5fajWd6e2fsoizgu3xwSgc3Da04FRcMlQH-_LTmcrB7WshhAmF4&amp;s=JH57jU8E421_YGf2deJVnDa8UdNwVdydb5Gtpa0IjLk&amp;e=">Read more</a></p></blockquote>
<p>And it’s not just food.  Look what’s happening with drinks.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__t.marketing1.william-2Dreed.com_r_-3Fid-3Dh39fe72b7-2C497303a2-2C42d949d8-26e-3DY2lkPURNMTI3MjkyMyZiaWQ9OTcyOTc2ODIz-26s-3DaWl7b4SqWEnSr1-5FZW6uyInizWovWXwATmlshnTklp7g&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=8V9B2f-fDMh8Os-RNPKP8iRT3ePxv6-lL_BCkdn2wCXCrssvjGxYaf8-O6Vzx8C4&amp;s=R4NU9aZdL2l73PVhZYcWQeWS1HRmesF9ZC5BWlDRFl8&amp;e="><strong>From coffee to soda: How protein is making waves in beverage innovation:  </strong></a>Drinks are a new frontier for protein innovation… <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__t.marketing1.william-2Dreed.com_r_-3Fid-3Dh39fe72b7-2C497303a2-2C42d949d9-26e-3DY2lkPURNMTI3MjkyMyZiaWQ9OTcyOTc2ODIz-26s-3DOqxyuNR4Dq7qcxQL09QdihsB1NGZTwvy8NWgh3b6Dho&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=8V9B2f-fDMh8Os-RNPKP8iRT3ePxv6-lL_BCkdn2wCXCrssvjGxYaf8-O6Vzx8C4&amp;s=JYokZa-DI35IZWEarVCCkPZSvzppqUwqAZFavAgxyGc&amp;e=">Read more</a></p></blockquote>
<p>And just because a product contains protein, doesn’t necessarily mean its healthy.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__t.marketing1.william-2Dreed.com_r_-3Fid-3Dh37eb7730-2C49539a44-2C42d22e3a-26e-3DY2lkPURNMTI2NTQ0MSZiaWQ9OTM4MTc4MzUy-26s-3DOrS2-2DsCHZAAKFzHGSQ0FbiroWmjb-2DHXQy6-2DK7f9zPVk&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=DqqyF66V6-1HQN0QIl4zGDseZFY_qB-topkoDCNbs4W7XqhBigXLCEmyFH9B-NaP&amp;s=M62DulXKZaJfGKMUWH6v7YDyxdZVKXcWEugXU1b7hRs&amp;e="><strong>The new paradox: Protein vs processing:  </strong></a>Protein is the snack industry’s hottest claim but if the foods delivering it are still ultra-processed, the sector may be building its next health halo on shaky ground… <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__t.marketing1.william-2Dreed.com_r_-3Fid-3Dh37eb7730-2C49539a44-2C42d22e3b-26e-3DY2lkPURNMTI2NTQ0MSZiaWQ9OTM4MTc4MzUy-26s-3DyXqNNcXkzJVx1O4idhvZxaCzwGOMF4K3nv6oS3-2D7U3Y&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=DqqyF66V6-1HQN0QIl4zGDseZFY_qB-topkoDCNbs4W7XqhBigXLCEmyFH9B-NaP&amp;s=GpwQiNTlhRQp-gOAHUlhxUTAuLimJVNIi-sM5Egr1Vk&amp;e=">Read more </a></p></blockquote>
<p>Unusual sources of protein are not doing so well these days.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><a href="https://www.feedstrategy.com/animal-feed-additives-ingredients/article/15819767/insect-feed-from-hype-to-reality?oly_enc_id=9352C6972923C7S">Insect protein’s reality check</a>: </strong>High costs, failed ventures and slower-than-expected market growth temper early optimism.</p></blockquote>
<p>But peptides—smaller chains of amino acids—are another craze, despite lack of evidence for their benefits.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__t.marketing1.william-2Dreed.com_r_-3Fid-3Dh38b6197a-2C495f2d66-2C42d4c92b-26e-3DY2lkPURNMTI2ODA1OCZiaWQ9OTUxNDU4MTcw-26s-3DVCaGRFY8m5SEF9vlBQvcoYcCfC9jm9qyN-2DzBSRPvPhc&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=p2XYPBuNl6LV0sBsh3gePVLnbVrOil6syL3XZWvPrXn14GDrYec_SFnzd57GGxef&amp;s=CBYcz_MhyiC7mnvCo7FkpxyL75psyYWZbhFwOil3RMk&amp;e="><strong>Peptides Move From Fringe Biohacks to Functional Food Frontier:  </strong></a>As demand surges for targeted health solutions, Nuritas’ Nora Khaldi discusses how AI is transforming peptide discovery, and why food and beverage may be the industry’s next big play… <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__t.marketing1.william-2Dreed.com_r_-3Fid-3Dh38b6197a-2C495f2d66-2C42d4c92c-26e-3DY2lkPURNMTI2ODA1OCZiaWQ9OTUxNDU4MTcw-26s-3D-5FZYn7XXXBuwOw9gJaKEBeo3h6OomIGfiQ0v8QF-2D0pj8&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=p2XYPBuNl6LV0sBsh3gePVLnbVrOil6syL3XZWvPrXn14GDrYec_SFnzd57GGxef&amp;s=Xc0SklrLmJifJbGkaWw6pXlmFeQ6esIKCOr5VfOfXMo&amp;e=">Listen now</a></p></blockquote>
<p>As always, I’m for getting protein from foods, largely plant sources.  Yes plant proteins sometimes are low in essential amino acids but the low ones differ among plant sources, so variety takes care of gaps: rice, wheat, and corn with beans, peanut butter sandwiches.  Easy.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/the-eye-rolling-protein-craze-some-thoughts/">The eye-rolling protein craze: some thoughts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28547</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Journal of Public Health series on Ultraprocessed Foods: My Editorial</title>
		<link>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/public-health-series-on-ultraprocessed-foods-my-editorial/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 13:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dietary-Guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultraprocessed]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=28552</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The American Journal of Public Health has just published a series of papers on ultraprocessed foods to which I contributed this editorial.  These papers are released today as part of the launch of new initiative, FedUP! aimed at establishing policies to help reduce consumption of ultraprocessed foods and prevent their harm to health. Press releases [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/public-health-series-on-ultraprocessed-foods-my-editorial/">American Journal of Public Health series on Ultraprocessed Foods: My Editorial</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Journal of Public Health has just published a series of papers on ultraprocessed foods to which I contributed this editorial.  These papers are released today as part of the launch of new initiative, <strong><a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/Fed-UP-2-pager.pdf">FedUP!</a> </strong>aimed at establishing policies to help reduce consumption of ultraprocessed foods and prevent their harm to health.</p>
<p>Press releases for the series and campaign are <strong><a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/FOR-IMMEDIATE-RELEASE.pdf">here</a></strong> and <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/AJPH-Press-Release_FINAL.docx-3.pdf"><strong>here</strong> (</a>longer, more quotes<a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/AJPH-Press-Release_FINAL.docx-3.pdf">)</a><strong>.  </strong></p>
<p>The other papers are <strong><a href="https://ajph.aphapublications.org/ultraprocessedfoodssection">on the AJPH webpage dedicated to this series</a>;</strong> all are open access.</p>
<p>Here is the <strong><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ai4O2Ffesgg">recording of the press conference</a>.</strong></p>
<p>Press coverage <strong><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1ihJ0YoLbD7bQE-2D1RlaJVjVw0eiKJ-5FnetwupTMnD31vE_edit-3Ftab-3Dt.0&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=nYKCipski1j8Rh7E7d5yH2v92gdZwCm8H7cBOAKtx6RvR0MZQdNGNEX3PiE6z0z4&amp;s=xHiZpTLlfyI5N6kXeeJsMa-eqPTVf3jrV1LPy824D-Q&amp;e=">is here.</a></strong></p>
<p>And here is my editorial.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-28563" src="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/Screenshot-2026-06-03-071205-500x329.png" alt="" width="500" style="display:block;margin:10px auto;max-width:560px;max-width:100%;"></p>
<h2><span style="color: #3366ff;"><strong>The Politics of Ultraprocessed Foods: Dietary Guidelines for Americans</strong></span></h2>
<p><em>Marion</em><em> Nestle, PhD, MPH</em></p>
<p>On January 7, 2026, the Trump administration’s Departments of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Agriculture (USDA) jointly released the 2025–2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. For the first time since they were established in 1980, these called for “a dramatic reduction in highly processed foods laden with refined carbohydrates, added sugars, excess sodium, unhealthy fats, and chemical additives.” The actual guideline, one of eight, says “Limit highly processed foods, added sugars, &amp; refined carbohydrates.”<sup> 1</sup></p>
<p>Although these statements do not use the term “ultraprocessed,” that is clearly what they mean. The guidelines are based on a commissioned scientific foundation report that refers repeatedly to ultraprocessed foods and cites major studies of their health effects.<sup>2</sup> Those studies, largely observational, used the Nova classification system to divide foods into four categories based on their degree of processing: unprocessed or minimally processed (Nova 1), processed culinary ingredients (Nova 2), processed (Nova 3), and ultraprocessed (Nova 4).<sup>3</sup> The scientific foundation report notes three reasons for avoiding the Nova 4 term: no consensus definition of “ultraprocessed” exists, defining refined starches and sugars as Nova 2 underestimates dietary intake of Nova 4 foods, and the Nova system classifies some nutrient-dense foods as ultraprocessed. On this basis, the guidelines use “highly processed” as a euphemism.</p>
<p>Even so, the very mention of processing in the US dietary guidelines must be considered an important forward step. In advising limits on highly processed foods, HHS and USDA reversed the decision made by the Biden administration’s Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC). That committee judged the category of ultraprocessed to be too ambiguously defined, and the observational evidence for its harm to health too subject to error, to warrant an “eat less” recommendation.<sup>4</sup> I view this decision as overly cautious. Yes, observational studies can only demonstrate association, not causation, but of more than 100 studies of ultraprocessed diets and health, nearly all found such diets to increase risks for chronic disease and overall mortality.<sup>3</sup></p>
<p>Furthermore, the DGAC excluded consideration of the one exceptionally well-controlled randomized clinical trial available at the time. The participants in that study were housed in a metabolic ward—they could not lie or cheat about what they were eating—and given a diet of either minimally processed or nutritionally comparable ultraprocessed foods. The study results were unexpected and dramatic; the participants consumed an average of 500 calories a day more on the ultraprocessed diet, without realizing it.<sup>5</sup> The DGAC eliminated this trial from consideration because it had set criteria for inclusion that required studies to last longer and involve more participants.<sup>6</sup> I thought the DGAC should have made an exception for this trial; metabolic ward studies are enormously expensive and few human volunteers are willing to be locked in one for more than a few weeks.</p>
<p>At issue is the preponderance of research; scientists can interpret it differently. The Trump administration’s commissioned research review found “robust and consistent adverse associations between HPF [highly processed food] consumption and a broad range of chronic health outcomes, often in a dose–response fashion,” and concluded that “the current evidence base provides a strong rationale for immediate action at the individual, population, institutional, and policy levels.”<sup>7</sup> Many researchers and nutrition professionals, including me, agree with this assessment.<sup>8</sup></p>
<p>This guideline is new, but most of the other 2025 dietary guidelines are consistent with long-standing scientific consensus on the benefits of eating more vegetables, fruits, and whole grains, and limiting intake of added sugars, sodium, and alcohol, although they call for greater restriction of sugars and less precise (vague) restriction of alcohol. The guidelines sharply diverge from consensus in recommending a doubling of protein—a euphemism for meat—and in not emphasizing plant foods more strongly. They promote greater intake of meat along with full-fat dairy, butter, and beef tallow, but inconsistently limit saturated fat to 10% of calories.<sup>1</sup></p>
<p>The agencies’ fact sheet makes the politics explicit; it uses the word “evangelizing.” Its major point: previous governments have lied to you about dietary risks, and you need to take personal responsibility for what you eat. In doing so, the guidelines reject concerns about health equity—and, therefore, policies that might address social determinants of health—as deserving of consideration.<sup>9</sup> Despite promises that the guidelines would be free of conflicts of interest, four of the nine writers of the research reviews report financial ties to meat and dairy industry groups, and three more disclose ties to other food industries.<sup>3</sup> The conflicted interests and emphasis on animal-based foods make these guidelines appear to have been captured by the meat and dairy industries.<sup>10</sup></p>
<p>I cannot determine whether these guidelines were influenced more by corporate capture or by the personal ideologies of the agency secretaries; they, after all, selected the individuals who wrote the research reviews and are responsible for what the guidelines say. I also do not know how even “highly processed” made it into the guidelines in the face of what surely must have been intense food industry opposition. The food industry, joined by some nutrition scientists, much prefers guidelines based on nutrient content: sugar, salt, fat. Doing so permits the few frequently cited nutrient-dense Nova 4 products—some whole wheat breads, yogurts, and power bars, and plant-based meats—to be considered processed, not ultraprocessed.</p>
<p>Critics of the ultraprocessed concept endlessly invoke the same arguments: there is no scientific consensus on the meaning of the term, and the concept risks undermining “established, evidence-based nutrition strategies,” thereby shifting “the focus away from the most important thing about food which is the nutrition aspect.”<sup>11</sup> But thoughtful rebuttals to these arguments note that food misclassifications do not appear to change study conclusions; well-controlled clinical trials have now been repeated with similar, biologically plausible results; the mechanisms of action of ultraprocessed foods are under study; and even “healthy” ultraprocessed foods induce greater calorie consumption.<sup>2</sup></p>
<p>Behind food industry arguments is the enormous profitability of ultraprocessed products. Indeed, the very purpose of ultraprocessing is profit maximization—using low-cost ingredients to create irresistible and long-lasting products—so much so that this goal is built into its Nova definition.<sup>2</sup><sup>,9 </sup>The food industry’s objection to the inclusion of processing as a consideration in dietary guidelines comes down to this: eating less is bad for business.</p>
<p>The call for limits on ultraprocessed foods may be groundbreaking in US dietary guidelines, but in 2015, Brazil issued guidelines that included advice to “Make natural or minimally processed foods the basis of your diet.”<sup>12</sup> Unlike US guidelines. these were based on the idea that healthy diets should derive from socially and environmentally sustainable food systems. This is a major conceptual difference from the US approach, which emphasizes personal responsibility above all others.</p>
<p>When individuals are deemed entirely responsible for their own dietary intake, government policies need focus only on education. If objections to the guidelines from the food industry have been mild so far, it is surely because its leaders know that education is not enough to change dietary behavior. They much prefer education to policies aimed at regulating product contents and marketing. But to really help people reduce intake of ultraprocessed foods, we need a wide range of policy options—taxes, subsidies, marketing, procurement, product placement<sup>13</sup>—aimed at making healthier foods more available, accessible, and affordable.</p>
<p><strong>ABOUT THE AUTHOR</strong></p>
<p>Marion Nestle is with the Department of Nutrition and Food Studies, New York University, New York, NY.</p>
<p><strong>Correspondence </strong></p>
<p>Correspondence should be sent to Marion Nestle, Department of Nutrition and Food Studies, New York University, New York NY 10003 (e-mail: marion.nestle@nyu.edu). Reprints can be ordered at http://www.ajph.org by clicking the “Reprints” link.</p>
<p>DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2026.308530</p>
<p><strong>CONFLICTS OF INTEREST</strong></p>
<p>Marion Nestle earns honoraria from lectures and royalties from books about the politics of food.</p>
<p><strong>REFERENCES</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>US Dept of Health and Human Services and US Dept of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025-2030.  Available at: <a href="https://cdn.realfood.gov/DGA.pdf">https://cdn.realfood.gov/DGA.pdf</a>.  Accessed April 4, 2026.</li>
<li>US Dept of Health and Human Services and US Dept of Agriculture. The scientific foundation for the dietary guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030. Available at: https://cdn.realfood.gov/Scientific%20Report.pdf. Accessed March 4, 2026.</li>
<li>MonteiroCA, LouzadaML, Steele-MartinezE, et al. Ultra-processed foods and human health: the main thesis and the evidence. <em>Lancet</em>. 2025;406(10520):2667–2684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01565-X</li>
<li>US Dept of Health and Human Services and US Dept of Agriculture. <em>Scientific Report of the 2025 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee</em>. Dec 2024. Available at: <a href="https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/2025-advisory-committee-report">https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/2025-advisory-committee-report</a>. Accessed April 3, 2026.</li>
<li>HallKD, AyuketahA, BrychtaR, et al. Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain: an inpatient randomized controlled trial of ad libitum food intake. <em>Cell Metab</em>. 2019;30(1):67–77.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008</li>
<li>LaMotteS. They’re up to 70% of the American diet. But the US has no policy on ultraprocessed foods. <em>CNN Health</em>. November 22, 2024. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/22/health/ultraprocessed-food-us-dietary-guidelines-wellness. Accessed February 27, 2026.</li>
<li>GoranM. Appendix 4.1. In: U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services and U.S.Dept of Agriculture. Impact of highly processed foods on multiple health outcomes: umbrella review of prior meta-analysis.<em>The Scientific Foundation for the Dietary Guidelines for Americans: Appendices</em>. Jan 7, 2026. Available at: <a href="https://cdn.realfood.gov/Scientific%20Report%20Appendices.pdf">https://cdn.realfood.gov/Scientific%20Report%20Appendices.pdf</a>. Accessed April 3, 2026.</li>
<li>BakerP, SlaterS, WhiteM, et al. Towards unified global action on ultra-processed foods: understanding commercial determinants, countering corporate power, and mobilising a public health response. <em>Lancet</em>. 2025;406(10520):2703–2726. https://doi.org/<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01567-3">10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01567-3</a></li>
<li>US Dept of Health and Human Services and US Dept of Agriculture. Fact sheet: Trump administration resets US nutrition policy, puts real food back at the center of health. January 7, 2026. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/fact-sheet-historic-reset-federal-nutrition-policy.html. Accessed February 27, 2026.</li>
<li>NevesFS, NilsonEAF, MendesLL, et al. The 2025–2030 US Dietary Guidelines: an analysis of scientific integrity and global health governance. <em>Lancet Reg Health Am</em>. 2026;56:101402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2026.101402</li>
<li>Food Navigator—Europe. Industry takes aim at Lancet’s deadly UPF report. November 20, 2025. Available at: https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2025/11/20/lancet-upf-report-sparks-industry-pushback-over-policy-and-evidence-gaps/#:~:text=Most%20question%20the%20scientific%20basis,clarity%20instead%20of%20damning%20reports. Accessed February 27, 2026.</li>
<li>Brazil Ministry of Health. Dietary guidelines for the Brazilian population. 2015. Available at: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/dietary_guidelines_brazilian_population.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2026.</li>
<li>ScrinisG, PopkinBM, CorvalanC, et al. Policies to halt and reverse the rise in ultra-processed food production, marketing, and consumption. <em>Lancet</em>. 2025;406(10520):2685–2702. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01566-1</li>
</ol>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/public-health-series-on-ultraprocessed-foods-my-editorial/">American Journal of Public Health series on Ultraprocessed Foods: My Editorial</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28552</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Journal of Health Promotion: papers on misinformation: my latest</title>
		<link>https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/new-papers-on-misinformation-my-latest/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dietary-Guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultraprocessed]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.foodpolitics.com/?p=28549</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The True Health Initiative held its 2nd Annual Global Health Misinformation Symposium, in which I participated.  The papers from the symposium have just been published in the American Journal of Health Promotion.  They are available under the heading “Knowing Well, Being Well” on the journal’s site.  All are open access.  My contribution is here. Food [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/new-papers-on-misinformation-my-latest/">American Journal of Health Promotion: papers on misinformation: my latest</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="https://truehealthinitiative.org/">True Health Initiative</a> held its <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__truehealth.acemlnb.com_lt.php-3Fx-3D4lZy-7EGDEIFadE8-5FAyg-2D5heRw-7E3QoudL0kug4jqbHJISb5Xz8zUy7x.Nu1XSRzk-7Ew-5Fx6tXXPJMnKd6I382N1MUOF&amp;d=DwMFaQ&amp;c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&amp;r=Ot3cZ4eiuUPwiNJa6TEJ7HtofwOJH_f5Im9On8R25Ic&amp;m=wSW9GzjmOlz-szVXPoK6FiwVMklLhQt024lN_C_XuF2JXWFUg4m2Q5Mc0HN0EU3-&amp;s=PHHZypTMCGFd9g0F3SK2lXnXRo-jUsnvYIyKwesoCvU&amp;e="><u>2nd Annual Global Health Misinformation Symposium,</u></a> in which <a href="https://truehealthinitiative.org/2nd-annual-global-health-misinformation-symposium-2025-recording/">I participated</a>.  The papers from the symposium have just been published in the American Journal of Health Promotion.  They are available under the heading <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/AHP/0/0">“Knowing Well, Being Well” on the journal’s site.</a>  All are open access.  My contribution <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/AJHP_Misinformation_26.pdf">is here.</a></p>
<h2><a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171261447115">Food Politics in an Era of Misinformation</a></h2>
<p>Marion Nestle, PhD, MPH</p>
<section id="bodymatter" data-extent="bodymatter">
<div class="core-container">
<div role="paragraph">I write books about the politics of food, most recently <i>What to Eat Now.</i> When my first book on the topic, <i>Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health,</i> appeared in 2002, the first question everyone asked me was “What does food have to do with politics?” But since President Donald Trump appointed Robert F. Kennedy Jr as Secretary of Health and Human Services, I am no longer asked that question. Trump introduced Kennedy’s nomination with this statement: “For too long, Americans have been crushed by the industrial food complex and drug companies who have engaged in deception, misinformation, and disinformation when it comes to public health.”<sup><a id="core-bibr1-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr1-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr1-08901171261447115">1</a></sup> It is now more obvious than ever that just as food has cultural, religious, and socioeconomic dimensions, it also has political dimensions. Here, I present examples of how politics affects food choice in three areas especially vulnerable to misinformation: food and nutrition research, ultra-processed foods, and dietary guidelines.</div>
<section id="sec-1">
<h2>Food and Nutrition Research</h2>
<div role="paragraph">Food companies are not social service or public health agencies; their primary, first-priority job is to generate profits for shareholders. One way food companies express this priority is to sponsor research. But industry-funded studies tend to follow what Sheldon Krimsky termed the “funding effect”—industry-funded studies strongly tend to produce results favorable to the sponsor’s commercial interests.<sup><a id="core-bibr2-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr2-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr2-08901171261447115">2</a></sup> Such studies are not invariably biased in a corporate-friendly direction; they just are skewed in that direction more often than not. When researching my book on this topic, <i>Unsavory Truth,</i> I was only able to find 11 studies published on the funding effect in food and nutrition research (by 2018). These varied in methods, products, and health effects, but all reported benefits to sponsors’ interests. Recipients of industry funding often appear unaware of the influence of industry funding and deny it. They may conduct their studies according to high scientific standards, but investigations of funding effects demonstrate that the bias mainly shows up in the framing of the research question or in the interpretation of results (null results interpreted as positive, for example). It is one thing to call for open-ended research on diet and health, but quite another to request proposals for research to demonstrate benefits. Food companies are unlikely to sponsor research that might produce unfavorable results.<sup><a id="core-bibr3-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr3-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr3-08901171261447115">3</a></sup></div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph">Some scientists argue that concerns about funding effects represent ad hominem attacks on researchers. Career goals, scientific beliefs, dietary practices, and belief systems, they insist, are just as biasing as industry funding; disclosure is sufficient to deal with the problem.<sup><a id="core-bibr4-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr4-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr4-08901171261447115">4</a></sup> But not all influences in science pose conflicts of interest. All scientists have beliefs about the likely outcome of their research; they have hypotheses they are trying to prove. These beliefs differ among researchers, as do the outcomes of their studies. But with industry funding, the biases are the same; they tend to favor the sponsor’s interests.<sup><a id="core-bibr5-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr5-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr5-08901171261447115">5</a></sup> Companies fund studies to “prove” their products are superfoods, or health promoting, or at least not harmful. Industry-funded research is about marketing, not science.</div>
</section>
<section id="sec-2">
<h2>Ultra-Processed Foods</h2>
<div role="paragraph">In 2025, The Lancet released three comprehensive reports on the science,<sup><a id="core-bibr6-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr6-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr6-08901171261447115">6</a></sup> policy,<sup><a id="core-bibr7-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr7-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr7-08901171261447115">7</a></sup> and politics<sup><a id="core-bibr8-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr8-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr8-08901171261447115">8</a></sup> of ultra-processed foods (I am a co-author on the last two). The process for producing these reports was lengthy and difficult, not least because the journal’s editors were skeptical of the concept of ultra-processed foods and pushed the authors to clarify the concepts and strengthen the evidence. Eventually the editors were convinced; they introduced the reports with an editorial powerfully titled “Ultra-processed foods: time to put health before profit.”<sup><a id="core-bibr9-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr9-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr9-08901171261447115">9</a></sup></div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph">Ultra-processed foods were defined by Carlos Monteiro et al in 2009 according to what they called the Nova system, which divides foods into four categories based on their degree of processing: unprocessed or minimally processed (Nova 1), processed culinary ingredients (Nova 2), processed (Nova 3), and ultra-processed (Nova 4).<sup><a id="core-bibr6-08901171261447115-2" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr6-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr6-08901171261447115">6</a>,<a id="core-bibr10-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr10-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr10-08901171261447115">10</a></sup> Ultra-processed foods are industrially produced, do not resemble the foods from which they were produced, typically contain sugars, salt, and industrial chemicals, and are designed to be irresistible (if not addictive)–and highly profitable. Many studies link diets high in ultra-processed foods to poor health outcomes. Although most of these studies are observational and cannot prove causation, well controlled clinical trials demonstrate that ultra-processed diets induce people to greatly overconsume calories, without realizing it.<sup><a id="core-bibr11-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr11-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr11-08901171261447115">11</a></sup> This result alone is reason enough for advice to reduce consumption of ultra-processed foods.</div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph">Understandably, the food industry opposes this concept: eating less is bad for business. Food trade associations argue that all foods are processed, processing is necessary, and the concept of ultra-processed is poorly defined, especially because it excludes highly nutritious foods such as commercial whole wheat breads and yogurts. The food industry is joined in these criticisms by some nutrition scientists concerned about inaccuracies in observational studies and the short duration and limited number of subjects in the controlled clinical trials.<sup><a id="core-bibr12-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr12-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr12-08901171261447115">12</a></sup> These criticisms hold grains of truth, but the overwhelming preponderance of evidence argues in favor of advice to reduce intake of ultra-processed foods.</div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph">The food industry, however, is on the attack. It much prefers education focused on salt, sugar, and saturated fat (encouraging product reformulation) Business advisors call for strongly defending ultra-processed foods in two ways. The food industry should educate the public about the benefits of ultra-processed foods and the flaws in the Nova classification system; it also should conduct its own research to demonstrate those benefits and flaws<sup><a id="core-bibr13-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr13-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr13-08901171261447115">13</a></sup>–misinformation via public relations and funded research.</div>
</section>
<section id="sec-3">
<h2>Dietary Guidelines</h2>
<div role="paragraph">The call for education brings me to the 2025-2030 dietary guidelines, supporting documents released on January 7, 2026, and the process used to produce them. When I was a member of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC) in 1995, we selected the topics to be researched, did the research, wrote the research report—and wrote the actual dietary guidelines. We turned these documents over to HHS and USDA to be printed. We were fully responsible for their content. That changed in 2005 when the agencies took over writing the guidelines. Since 2010, the agencies have taken over the entire process except for</div>
<div role="paragraph">the DGAC research review. The dietary guidelines are now an almost entirely political—rather than scientific—document.</div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph">The DGAC for the 2025-2030 guidelines was appointed during the previous administration; it released its report in December 2024.<sup><a id="core-bibr14-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr14-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr14-08901171261447115">14</a></sup> Its recommendations were much like those of previous guidelines since 1980: balance calories; eat more fruits, vegetables, and whole grains; reduce intake of sugars, sodium, saturated fat, alcohol, red and processed meat; choose low-fat dairy. Although this DGAC was asked to consider a recommendation on ultra-processed foods, it chose not to on the basis of flaws in observational data and the short duration of the one, then available, exceptionally well-controlled clinical trial conducted in a metabolic ward.<sup><a id="core-bibr11-08901171261447115-2" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr11-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr11-08901171261447115">11</a></sup></div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph">The Trump administration’s HHS and USDA, however, rejected most of that report and started over. It gave nine experts three months or less to write their own reviews of the science; these formed the basis of the new guidelines and the new inverted pyramid food guide released under the slogan “Eat real food.” While most of the eight guidelines are similar to those issued previously, one of the differences is advice to limit intake of highly processed foods (a euphemism for ultra-processed). So far, so good.<sup><a id="core-bibr15-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr15-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr15-08901171261447115">15</a></sup></div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph">Beyond that advice, however, the new guidelines include recommendations less well supported by existing evidence. They call for prioritizing and doubling intake of protein (a euphemism for red meat), consuming whole milk, and choosing “healthy” fats rich in essential fatty acids. Unfortunately, the guidelines’ examples of such fats are olive oil, butter, and beef tallow, none of them good sources of the two essential fatty acids, linoleic and linolenic. Errors like these, confusing messages (add salt, but restrict sodium; eat animal fats but keep saturated fat to 10% or less of calories), and the way animal-source foods are presented in the accompanying website for the inverted pyramid (<a href="https://realfood.gov/">RealFood.gov</a>), make the guidelines appear to have been influenced by the meat and dairy industries, especially because so many writers of the science summaries reported financial ties to meat and dairy trade associations.<sup><a id="core-bibr16-08901171261447115-1" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr16-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr16-08901171261447115">16</a></sup> The guidelines also appear to reflect the dietary ideology of Secretary Kennedy, who consumes a publicly avowed carnivore diet.</div>
<div role="paragraph"></div>
<div role="paragraph">The new dietary guidelines are aimed explicitly at personal responsibility for dietary choice. But placing the dietary burden entirely on individuals absolves the government from doing anything other than educate. If objections to the guidelines from the food industry have been mild so far, it is surely because its leaders know that education is not enough to change dietary behavior. They much prefer education to policies aimed at regulating product contents or marketing. But to really help people eat real food and reduce intake of ultra-processed foods, we need a wide range of policy options—taxes, subsidies, marketing, procurement, product placement<sup><a id="core-bibr7-08901171261447115-2" role="doc-biblioref" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08901171261447115?_gl=1*14m2ob8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjM2NjMwMjA5LjE3ODAxODQ1NTI.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3ODAxODQ1NTIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODAxODQ1NTIkajYwJGwxJGgyMDA3MjkxNTMw#bibr7-08901171261447115" data-xml-rid="bibr7-08901171261447115">7</a></sup>—to make healthier foods more available, accessible, and affordable, so that the healthy choice is the easier choice.</div>
</section>
<section id="conflict" class="core-conflict">
<h2>Declaration of conflicting interests</h2>
<div role="paragraph">The author receives honoraria for lectures and royalties from books about the politics of food.</div>
</section>
<section id="funding" class="core-funding">
<h2>Funding</h2>
<div role="paragraph">The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.</div>
</section>
<section id="orcid" class="core-orcid">
<h2>ORCID iD</h2>
<div role="paragraph">Marion Nestle <a class="orcid-id" href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8700-6963" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-id="article-meta-orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8700-6963</a></div>
</section>
</div>
</section>
<section id="backmatter" data-extent="backmatter">
<div class="core-container">
<section id="bibliography" role="doc-bibliography">
<h2>References</h2>
<div role="list">
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr1-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="citation-content"><span class="label">1.</span> Trump DJ. <em>@RealDonaldTrump</em>; 2024. <a href="https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1857170020427595797">https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1857170020427595797</a>. Accessed 21 Mar 2026.</div>
<div class="external-links">
<div class="to-citation__wrapper"></div>
<div class="core-xlink-google-scholar"><a href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=%40RealDonaldTrump&amp;author=DJ+Trump&amp;publication_year=2024">Google Scholar</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr2-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="citation-content"><span class="label">2.</span> Krimsky S. Do financial conflicts of interest bias research? An inquiry into the “funding effect” hypothesis. <em>Sci Technol Hum Val</em>. 2013;38(4):566-587.</div>
<div class="external-links"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr3-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="citation-content"><span class="label">3.</span> Nestle M. <em>Unsavory Truth: How Food Companies Skew the Science of What We Eat.</em>. Basic Books; 2018.</div>
<div class="external-links">
<div class="to-citation__wrapper"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr4-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="citation-content"><span class="label">4.</span> Cope MB, Allison DB. White hat bias: a threat to the integrity of scientific reporting. <em>Acta Paediatr</em>. 2010;99:1615-1617.</div>
<div class="external-links">
<div class="to-citation__wrapper"></div>
<div class="core-xlink-google-scholar"><span class="label">5.</span> Bero LA, Grundy Q, Abelson J, Dobbins M, Carter N, Pavord I. Why having a (nonfinancial) interest is not a conflict of interest. <em>PLoS Biol</em>. 2016;14(12):e2001221.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr5-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="external-links">
<div class="core-xlink-google-scholar"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr6-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="citation-content"><span class="label">6.</span> Monteiro CA, Louzada ML, Steele-Martinez E, et al. Ultra-processed foods and human health 1. Ultra-processed foods and human health: the main thesis and the evidence. <em>Lancet</em>. 2025;406(10520):2667-2684.</div>
<div class="external-links">
<div class="core-xlink-google-scholar"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr7-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="citation-content"><span class="label">7.</span> Scrinis G, Popkin BM, Covalan C, et al. Ultra-processed foods and human health 2. Policies to halt and reverse the rise in ultra-processed food production, marketing, and consumption. <em>Lancet</em>. 2025;406:2685-2702.</div>
<div class="external-links">
<div class="core-xlink-google-scholar"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr8-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="citation-content"><span class="label">8.</span> Baker P, Slater S, White M, et al. Ultra-processed foods and human health 3. Towards unified global action on ultra-processed foods: understanding commercial determinants, countering corporate power, and mobilising a public health response. <em>Lancet</em>. 2025;406(10520):2703-2726.</div>
<div class="external-links">
<div class="core-xlink-google-scholar"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr9-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="citation-content"><span class="label">9.</span> <em>Lancet</em>. Editorial: Ultra-Processed foods: time to put health before profit. 2025;406(10520):2601.</div>
<div class="external-links">
<div class="to-citation__wrapper"></div>
<div class="core-xlink-google-scholar"><span class="label">10.</span> Monteiro CA. Nutrition and health. The issue is not food, nor nutrients, so much as processing. <em>Public Health Nutr</em>. 2009;12(5):729-731.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr10-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="external-links">
<div class="core-xlink-google-scholar"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr11-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="citation-content"><span class="label">11.</span> Hall KD, Ayuketah A, Brychta R, et al. Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain: an inpatient randomized controlled trial of ad libitum food intake. <em>Cell Metab</em>. 2019;30(1):67-77.e3.</div>
<div class="external-links">
<div class="core-xlink-google-scholar"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr12-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="citation-content"><span class="label">12.</span> Ludwig DS, Willett WC, Putt ME. Concerns over conclusions in an ultra-processed food trial. <em>Nat Med</em>. 2026;32(2):463-464.</div>
<div class="external-links">
<div class="to-citation__wrapper"></div>
<div class="core-xlink-google-scholar"><span class="label">13.</span> Southey F. The UPF problem: no more burying heads in the sand. <em>Food Navigator-Europe</em>. 2025. <a href="https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2025/11/27/food-and-drink-makers-cant-ignore-upf-problem-any-longer/">https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2025/11/27/food-and-drink-makers-cant-ignore-upf-problem-any-longer/</a>. Accessed 21 Mar 2026.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr13-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="external-links">
<div class="to-citation__wrapper"></div>
<div class="core-xlink-google-scholar"><span class="label">14.</span> HHS USDA. <em>Scientific Report of the 2025 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee</em>. 2024. Accessed Mar 21, 2026. <a href="https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/2025-advisory-committee-report">https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/2025-advisory-committee-report</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr14-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="external-links">
<div class="to-citation__wrapper"></div>
<div class="core-xlink-google-scholar"><span class="label">15.</span> HHS USDA. <em>Dietary guidelines for Americans, 2025-2030</em>. 2026. <a href="https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/">https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/</a>. Accessed 21 Mar 2026.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr15-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="external-links">
<div class="core-xlink-google-scholar"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div role="listitem">
<div id="bibr16-08901171261447115" class="citations">
<div class="citation">
<div class="citation-content"><span class="label">16.</span> Neves FS, Nilson EAF, Mendes LL, Khandpur N, Nestle M. The 2025–2030 US dietary guidelines: an analysis of scientific integrity and global health governance. <em>Lancet Reg Health, Am</em>. 2026;56:101402.</div>
<div class="external-links">
<div class="to-citation__wrapper"></div>
<div class="core-xlink-google-scholar"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</section>
</div>
</section>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com/2026/06/new-papers-on-misinformation-my-latest/">American Journal of Health Promotion: papers on misinformation: my latest</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.foodpolitics.com">Food Politics by Marion Nestle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28549</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
