<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Freakonomics</title><link>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com</link><description>New York Times Blog</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:42:53 PST</lastBuildDate><generator>WordPress http://wordpress.org/</generator><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.freakonomics.com/blog/?feed=rss2" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://www.freakonomics.com/blog/?feed=rss2" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item><title>Black-Market Breast Milk</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/gQl9xaNoz20/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>food</category><category>women</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By FREAKONOMICS</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:42:53 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=23579</guid><description>Australian mothers pay up to $1,000 for it on the Internet due to the country's shortage of breast-milk banks, the Courier Mail reports.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lQYYFb8eAk4WUXabFGugIeZW4Oo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lQYYFb8eAk4WUXabFGugIeZW4Oo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lQYYFb8eAk4WUXabFGugIeZW4Oo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lQYYFb8eAk4WUXabFGugIeZW4Oo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/gQl9xaNoz20" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/23/black-market-breast-milk/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Captain Steve Answers More of Your Airline Questions</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/zmnHxQQmRCo/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By STEPHEN J. DUBNER</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:18:00 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=23567</guid><description>For a few months now, we've been soliciting reader questions for Captain Steve, a pilot with a major U.S. airline. You can find his first few batches of answers here, and he's back now with another round. You can leave new questions for him in the comments section below.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/M_EAwKkJ6qLUiA1N414PfFvNUtY/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/M_EAwKkJ6qLUiA1N414PfFvNUtY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/M_EAwKkJ6qLUiA1N414PfFvNUtY/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/M_EAwKkJ6qLUiA1N414PfFvNUtY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/zmnHxQQmRCo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">19</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/22/captain-steve-answers-more-of-your-airline-questions-3/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Reflections on Paul Samuelson</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/gG4GaDsZDB8/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By FREAKONOMICS</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:17:16 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=23575</guid><description>The great &lt;a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/19/samuelson-sounds-off/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Paul Samuelson&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/14/business/economy/14samuelson.html"&gt;passed away last weekend&lt;/a&gt; at the age of 94, and several economists have now written about his life and work...
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/kF4yZHxgYaTumoXLA04W8DrZMHA/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/kF4yZHxgYaTumoXLA04W8DrZMHA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/kF4yZHxgYaTumoXLA04W8DrZMHA/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/kF4yZHxgYaTumoXLA04W8DrZMHA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/gG4GaDsZDB8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/22/reflections-on-paul-samuelson/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Hayek vs. Keynes: The Hip-Hop Version</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/L32zI3nkQAE/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>hip hop</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By STEVEN D. LEVITT</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:46:11 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=23539</guid><description>The &lt;a href="http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/17/keynes-vs-hayek-the-rap-battle/"&gt;Economix blog links&lt;/a&gt; to a PBS Newshour piece that includes two discussions of the current macroeconomics debate -- one between talking heads, and the other in the form of economics hip hop (a genre &lt;a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/18/the-latest-economics-rap/"&gt;we've reported on previously&lt;/a&gt;).
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/gCClWyTPWSFhjLJ_AtWC32OYdSc/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/gCClWyTPWSFhjLJ_AtWC32OYdSc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/gCClWyTPWSFhjLJ_AtWC32OYdSc/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/gCClWyTPWSFhjLJ_AtWC32OYdSc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/L32zI3nkQAE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">7</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/21/hayek-vs-keynes-the-hip-hop-version/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Where Has All the Viagra Spam Gone?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/7ZlZaSd_3DQ/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>spam</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By DANIEL HAMERMESH</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:12:05 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=23531</guid><description>Same for Nigerians seeking to transfer millions of dollars to me (if I give them my bank account number).

I haven't gotten one of these in a year, after often getting several a day. I assume that the spammers realized that the return per period of time -- the price of the activity -- was less than its marginal cost: the opportunity cost of their time.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/2er2ZQgEsFqbDaymQFawlBDT9mQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/2er2ZQgEsFqbDaymQFawlBDT9mQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/2er2ZQgEsFqbDaymQFawlBDT9mQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/2er2ZQgEsFqbDaymQFawlBDT9mQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/7ZlZaSd_3DQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">42</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/21/where-has-all-the-viagra-spam-gone/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Nathan Myhrvold on Geoengineering (and Penguin Poo)</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/O5-IhkHqtIA/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By STEVEN D. LEVITT</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:50:07 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=23525</guid><description>And, Nathan being Nathan, there is a brief discussion of penguin poo.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/OTfoDDWHG9YXYAn3qRABdIkxJQ0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/OTfoDDWHG9YXYAn3qRABdIkxJQ0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/OTfoDDWHG9YXYAn3qRABdIkxJQ0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/OTfoDDWHG9YXYAn3qRABdIkxJQ0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/O5-IhkHqtIA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">10</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/21/nathan-myhrvold-on-geoengineering-and-penguin-poo/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Are the Lakers a Sure Thing?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/GkeSmUgxvkI/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>basketball</category><category>investing</category><category>stock</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By FREAKONOMICS</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:00:32 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=23407</guid><description>For the 20-year period ending in 2007, the Los Angeles Lakers' NBA championship record did a surprisingly good job of reflecting the stock market.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/8jwxWTwQ1o-N2j6e9Pv4RpkyG9s/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/8jwxWTwQ1o-N2j6e9Pv4RpkyG9s/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/8jwxWTwQ1o-N2j6e9Pv4RpkyG9s/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/8jwxWTwQ1o-N2j6e9Pv4RpkyG9s/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/GkeSmUgxvkI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">16</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/18/are-the-lakers-a-sure-thing/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Rights to a View</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/p9owUejI0uc/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>government</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By DANIEL HAMERMESH</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:30:47 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=23473</guid><description>Who owns the rights to an air space and to a view? What are property rights in such cases? An article in our local paper discusses complaints of residents in a luxury condo complex who are insisting that the City Council help pay the $75,000 it would cost an outdoor advertiser to move a billboard that blocks their view and lowers their property values.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/mA3ulgeDb3OXBQ3w0DI_FjxcCyc/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/mA3ulgeDb3OXBQ3w0DI_FjxcCyc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/mA3ulgeDb3OXBQ3w0DI_FjxcCyc/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/mA3ulgeDb3OXBQ3w0DI_FjxcCyc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/p9owUejI0uc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">37</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/18/the-rights-to-a-view/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>When Statisticians Stink at Darts</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/vdiyK1hX23U/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>games</category><category>statistics</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By FREAKONOMICS</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:30:12 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=23455</guid><description>What was Stanford statistics student Ryan Tibshirani to do when his buddies kept beating him at darts?
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Y1aBMTy_BYTZYEstTFgkY96LxVA/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Y1aBMTy_BYTZYEstTFgkY96LxVA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Y1aBMTy_BYTZYEstTFgkY96LxVA/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Y1aBMTy_BYTZYEstTFgkY96LxVA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/vdiyK1hX23U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">6</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/18/when-statisticians-stink-at-darts/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Death and Taxes, Slightly Less Certain</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/mnx0igXJ1Tw/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By STEPHEN J. DUBNER</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:56:49 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=23477</guid><description>The second chapter of SuperFreakonomics, which is primarily about catching terrorists and running an emergency room, includes a few passages about the timing quirks of births and deaths.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/G-xueGKJC-lDF9H2oacCQ5rv9bU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/G-xueGKJC-lDF9H2oacCQ5rv9bU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/G-xueGKJC-lDF9H2oacCQ5rv9bU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/G-xueGKJC-lDF9H2oacCQ5rv9bU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/mnx0igXJ1Tw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">19</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/18/death-and-taxes-slightly-less-certain/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>A Naked Self-Promotion Roundup</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/FbzCwat0X1E/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>naked self-promotion</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By FREAKONOMICS</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:49:42 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=23479</guid><description>If you're in Times Square on Saturday, Dec. 19, keep an eye out for &lt;em&gt;SuperFreakonomics&lt;/em&gt; on the Dow Jones news zipper. A piece of &lt;em&gt;Freakonomics&lt;/em&gt; schwag will go to the first person who sends us a photo of the book's name up in lights.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/3BFwX1YavCL1iHcBDnU_LG7kf5g/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/3BFwX1YavCL1iHcBDnU_LG7kf5g/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/3BFwX1YavCL1iHcBDnU_LG7kf5g/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/3BFwX1YavCL1iHcBDnU_LG7kf5g/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/FbzCwat0X1E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/18/a-naked-self-promotion-roundup/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Worth the Wait?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/u5XcPM1rH8o/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>transit</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By ERIC A. MORRIS</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:52:24 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=23403</guid><description>Waiting may be fun when it involves opening Christmas presents or paying off your credit cards, but waiting for the bus is a miserable experience pretty much any way you look at it.

Long waits are one of the most important -- perhaps the most important -- barriers deterring Americans from riding mass transit.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/JV0KJJHZ7pYhUXKiCAyJpc6R08E/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/JV0KJJHZ7pYhUXKiCAyJpc6R08E/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/JV0KJJHZ7pYhUXKiCAyJpc6R08E/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/JV0KJJHZ7pYhUXKiCAyJpc6R08E/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/u5XcPM1rH8o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">33</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/17/worth-the-wait/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Quotes Uncovered: Violence and Enemies</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/ghc-errS6Vw/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>fred shapiro</category><category>quotes</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By FRED SHAPIRO</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:01:20 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=23399</guid><description>Each week, I've been inviting readers to submit quotations for which they want me to try to trace the origin, using &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Yale-Book-Quotations-Fred-Shapiro/dp/0300107986"&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Yale Book of Quotations&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and my own research. Here is the latest round.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SWk3NKT966l9hUVZi9kv_3tTD3E/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SWk3NKT966l9hUVZi9kv_3tTD3E/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SWk3NKT966l9hUVZi9kv_3tTD3E/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SWk3NKT966l9hUVZi9kv_3tTD3E/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/ghc-errS6Vw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">11</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/17/quotes-uncovered-violence-and-enemies/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>What to Get an Economist for Christmas?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/_o_KcCx4Z0w/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>economists</category><category>holidays</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By STEPHEN J. DUBNER</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:39:59 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=23415</guid><description>Christmas and economists go together like - well, like drinking and walking. Joel Waldfogel, the economist who is famous for highlighting the deadweight loss of gift-giving, has a new book out called Scroogenomics: Why You Shouldn't Buy Presents for the Holidays.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/k3W3FqturJhBkhwUL-lT49EIARU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/k3W3FqturJhBkhwUL-lT49EIARU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/k3W3FqturJhBkhwUL-lT49EIARU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/k3W3FqturJhBkhwUL-lT49EIARU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/_o_KcCx4Z0w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">53</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/17/what-to-get-an-economist-for-christmas/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Cool Down on the CT Scanning?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/VnDJfjQjK_k/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>hospitals</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By FREAKONOMICS</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:41:00 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=23411</guid><description>As the L.A. Times reports,
two new studies, from researchers at the University of California-San Francisco and the National Cancer Institute, suggest that hospitals may want to cut down on the volume of CT scans.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/z6I3upD1aaqouwo2yqrUYIc1svs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/z6I3upD1aaqouwo2yqrUYIc1svs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/z6I3upD1aaqouwo2yqrUYIc1svs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/z6I3upD1aaqouwo2yqrUYIc1svs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/VnDJfjQjK_k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">13</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/17/cool-down-on-the-ct-scanning/</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
