<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Freakonomics</title><link>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com</link><description>New York Times Blog</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:29:01 PST</lastBuildDate><generator>WordPress http://wordpress.org/</generator><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://www.freakonomics.com/blog/?feed=rss2" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://www.freakonomics.com/blog/?feed=rss2" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item><title>Of God and Money</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/a-N0yklv6r4/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By FREAKONOMICS</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:29:01 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=21857</guid><description>A priest, a minister, and a rabbi walk into an economics lab. Which one is most likely to increase contributions to the public good?
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/l6omNBPG9Bd1qBTRlhDWrqYwFS0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/l6omNBPG9Bd1qBTRlhDWrqYwFS0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/l6omNBPG9Bd1qBTRlhDWrqYwFS0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/l6omNBPG9Bd1qBTRlhDWrqYwFS0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/a-N0yklv6r4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">19</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/of-god-and-money/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>A Few Questions for Belle de Jour, Call Girl and Scientist</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/GsiriCOMnmk/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Belle de Jour</category><category>Prostitution</category><category>Q&amp;A</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By RYAN HAGEN</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:30:34 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=22055</guid><description>In 2003, a young American woman in London studying for her PhD. ran into money trouble. To support herself while writing her thesis, she joined an escort service. Under the assumed name Belle de Jour, she started to blog her experiences. That blog led to a series of successful, jaunty memoirs beginning with 2005's The Intimate Adventures of a London Call Girl. The books were adapted for television in the U.K. (where she is portrayed by Billie Piper) and later in the U.S.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/-lExEmfmlDYeKlpxgjErwLn42vQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/-lExEmfmlDYeKlpxgjErwLn42vQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/-lExEmfmlDYeKlpxgjErwLn42vQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/-lExEmfmlDYeKlpxgjErwLn42vQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/GsiriCOMnmk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">20</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/a-few-questions-for-belle-de-jour-call-girl-and-scientist/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Why Do We Hate?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/8tkH3p7djMA/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>emotions</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By FREAKONOMICS</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:21:23 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=22187</guid><description>"What makes hate tick? How can we stop it?" These are the questions that Jim Mohr, director of Gonzaga University's Institute for Action Against Hate, asks himself every day as he develops a new field of study around hate. Mohr believes that despite all the devastating examples of hate in the world, no one really understands why one person hates another.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/LfzMF3pbhiagnHupGqd_ioH4obQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/LfzMF3pbhiagnHupGqd_ioH4obQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/LfzMF3pbhiagnHupGqd_ioH4obQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/LfzMF3pbhiagnHupGqd_ioH4obQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/8tkH3p7djMA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">22</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/why-do-we-hate/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Introducing "Applied Freakonomics"</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/mYLQ1bMGPEc/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By STEVEN D. LEVITT</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:50:40 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=22179</guid><description>When blog reader Kyle contacted us with his story of how thinking "freakonomically" first netted - then lost - him significant amounts of incremental income, we had what we'd call an "aha moment," if Oprah hadn't apparently patented that phrase.

Here's Kyle's story - and if you have a tale of "applied Freakonomics," we'd love to hear it, too, and possibly feature it on the blog.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/frWyhwdEpoMTl6blBeZr89bF4CM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/frWyhwdEpoMTl6blBeZr89bF4CM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/frWyhwdEpoMTl6blBeZr89bF4CM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/frWyhwdEpoMTl6blBeZr89bF4CM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/mYLQ1bMGPEc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">19</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/introducing-applied-freakonomics/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>When Football Violence Turns Real</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/1qEZb5LOCO4/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>football</category><category>violence</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By FREAKONOMICS</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:42:43 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=22183</guid><description>It's well-established that domestic violence is bad for the children directly exposed to it (and possibly their classmates as well) but experts still debate the drivers of family violence. Economists have traditionally characterized violence as a signal to outside parties or as part of an incentive contract between family members.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/T4sbND9rRxWvOGVcwpm9tS7TmsE/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/T4sbND9rRxWvOGVcwpm9tS7TmsE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/T4sbND9rRxWvOGVcwpm9tS7TmsE/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/T4sbND9rRxWvOGVcwpm9tS7TmsE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/1qEZb5LOCO4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">17</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/when-football-violence-turns-real/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Quotes Uncovered: Who First Said "If You Can't Beat Em ... "</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/Fcrn51TN0fM/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>fred shapiro</category><category>quote</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By FRED SHAPIRO</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:00:19 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=22123</guid><description>Each week, I've been inviting readers to submit quotations for which they want me to try to trace the origin, using &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Yale-Book-Quotations-Fred-Shapiro/dp/0300107986"&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Yale Book of Quotations&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and my own research. Here is the latest round:
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uY9n1G2w8dDMqWXd3zuOSh5bWKQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uY9n1G2w8dDMqWXd3zuOSh5bWKQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uY9n1G2w8dDMqWXd3zuOSh5bWKQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uY9n1G2w8dDMqWXd3zuOSh5bWKQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/Fcrn51TN0fM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">40</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/quotes-uncovered-who-first-said-if-you-cant-beat-em/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Nathan Myhrvold, Mad Chef</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/HUtePQlmAVE/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>food</category><category>Nathan Myhrvold</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By STEPHEN J. DUBNER</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:26:50 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=21945</guid><description>Nathan Myhrvold is the Intellectual Ventures chieftain we wrote about in SuperFreakonomics; I.V. has plans to thwart, inter alia, hurricanes, malaria, and global warming. (He has also written for this blog occasionally.) Now he has let The N.Y. Times into his kitchen. It is not like any other kitchen you've ever seen; nor is the cookbook he is producing like any other that's been published:
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/2qSPN_MjsVvwvMcdW4jhU-N-EjY/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/2qSPN_MjsVvwvMcdW4jhU-N-EjY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/2qSPN_MjsVvwvMcdW4jhU-N-EjY/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/2qSPN_MjsVvwvMcdW4jhU-N-EjY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/HUtePQlmAVE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">8</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/nathan-myhrvold-mad-chef/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Improving Well-Being in the Classroom</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/GwKhkRT90I4/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Education</category><category>university</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By DANIEL HAMERMESH</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:00:20 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=22115</guid><description>Four of the 26 students in my Economics of Life class proposed delaying submitting their draft term project reports by one week. I emailed the whole class and gave them one day to let me know if they disapproved of this postponement.  

The question was how heavily to weight the negatives -- those who disapproved -- compared to those who wanted to postpone.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Hu-BeUzH_TDnYWgSeLZbUGRcqx8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Hu-BeUzH_TDnYWgSeLZbUGRcqx8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Hu-BeUzH_TDnYWgSeLZbUGRcqx8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Hu-BeUzH_TDnYWgSeLZbUGRcqx8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/GwKhkRT90I4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">24</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/improving-well-being-in-the-classroom/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>What Are the Coming Decade's Most Overblown Fears?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/HLB1Vg5xw9I/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>fears</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By STEPHEN J. DUBNER</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:10:34 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=21969</guid><description>Newsweek is running an online retrospective of the new millennium's first decade. My favorite section to date is the "Overblown Fears" list. Here they are, in order:

1. Y2K
2. Shoe Bombs
3. Vaccines Cause Autism
4. Immigrants
5. Bloggers
6. SARS, Mad Cow, Bird Flu
7. Web Predators
8. Teen Oral Sex Epidemic
9. Anthrax
10. Globalization
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/UUD7UlGJRKL7YsvYvsxfOuAcvBY/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/UUD7UlGJRKL7YsvYvsxfOuAcvBY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/UUD7UlGJRKL7YsvYvsxfOuAcvBY/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/UUD7UlGJRKL7YsvYvsxfOuAcvBY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/HLB1Vg5xw9I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">193</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/what-are-the-coming-decades-most-overblown-fears/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Latest in Naked Self-Promotion</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/_KClrgQjM88/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>SuperFreakonomics</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By FREAKONOMICS</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:35:34 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=21881</guid><description>If you missed Levitt and Dubner on their U.K. SuperFreakonomics tour, a podcast of their lecture at the London School of Economics is now online. So are their interviews with Reuters TV, Channel 4, and Telegraph TV, as is the BBC's piece on how SuperFreakonomics fits into the David Cameron book club. Some U.S. tour appearances are available online as well, from the Commonwealth Club, the Motley Fool, and the Philadelphia Free Library.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uP2FVhoc-o36pLMRGJoX_-thRXA/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uP2FVhoc-o36pLMRGJoX_-thRXA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uP2FVhoc-o36pLMRGJoX_-thRXA/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/uP2FVhoc-o36pLMRGJoX_-thRXA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/_KClrgQjM88" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/the-latest-in-naked-self-promotion/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>SuperFreakonomics Book Club: Ask Sudhir Venkatesh About Street Prostitution</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/XIV__dZWPCc/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Sudhir Venkatesh</category><category>SuperFreakonomics Book Club</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By STEPHEN J. DUBNER</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:37:05 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=21809</guid><description>In the first installment of our virtual book club, Emily Oster answered your questions about her research (co-authored with Rob Jensen) which argues that the lives of rural women in India improved on several dimensions thanks to the widespread adoption of television.

That story appeared in our book's introduction. Now we're moving on to Chapter One. We will probably feature a few Q&amp;#038;A's with the subjects and researchers featured in this chapter, which is described in the Table of Contents like this:
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SST-racxMrm5axMXh30fhi8mZHE/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SST-racxMrm5axMXh30fhi8mZHE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SST-racxMrm5axMXh30fhi8mZHE/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/SST-racxMrm5axMXh30fhi8mZHE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/XIV__dZWPCc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">35</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/18/superfreakonomics-book-club-ask-sudhir-venkatesh-about-street-prostitution/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>A New Solution to Unemployment?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/_fpScNfuiy8/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Organ donation</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By FREAKONOMICS</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:53:41 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=22069</guid><description>We've blogged extensively about the &lt;a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/tag/organs/"&gt;serious organ-doner shortage&lt;/a&gt; in the U.S. and the debate over establishing a market for organs. Now it seems the recession has uncovered some unexpected potential participants in the organ market: unemployed white collar Americans.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/OLhpIDk97-XzmOF24L4orN6VVTk/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/OLhpIDk97-XzmOF24L4orN6VVTk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/OLhpIDk97-XzmOF24L4orN6VVTk/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/OLhpIDk97-XzmOF24L4orN6VVTk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/_fpScNfuiy8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">21</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/18/a-new-solution-to-unemployment/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>"Just Compensation" Can Lead to More Government Takings</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/_621e1CNxh4/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>government</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By IAN AYRES</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:11:34 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=21927</guid><description>We are trapped in a world with far too few IRS audits. Law abiding tax payers hate being audited and their representatives in Congress have heard the message loud and clear - strangling the ability of the IRS to conduct field examinations. The problem with the current state of affairs is that non-law-abiding tax payers find it far too easy to avoid paying their fair share.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/O-mMxe2m53bjCUNKx5HO91CgHm4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/O-mMxe2m53bjCUNKx5HO91CgHm4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/O-mMxe2m53bjCUNKx5HO91CgHm4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/O-mMxe2m53bjCUNKx5HO91CgHm4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/_621e1CNxh4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">9</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/18/just-compensation-can-lead-to-more-government-takings/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>King Condom</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/2jYjw8MnwHM/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Fertility</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By STEPHEN J. DUBNER</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:02:38 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=21935</guid><description>Police in Hunan province, China, raided a workshop said to be producing counterfeit condoms. &lt;a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article6911127.ece"&gt;According to the (U.K.) &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Bare-chested employees were found using vegetable oil to lubricate the condoms to make them smooth and shiny before placing them directly in fiber bags without bothering with sterilization.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Po3MXCSwVP_Tf95c1YjiAr7t6vU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Po3MXCSwVP_Tf95c1YjiAr7t6vU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Po3MXCSwVP_Tf95c1YjiAr7t6vU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Po3MXCSwVP_Tf95c1YjiAr7t6vU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/2jYjw8MnwHM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">8</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/18/king-condom/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Birds Like You've Never Seen Them</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/J8Upz_h_CnU/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>photography</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By FREAKONOMICS</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:55:03 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=21867</guid><description>Worker productivity is up dramatically, despite the release of photographer Andrew Zuckerman's mind-blowing book - and totally engrossing website - Bird.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ddUwLoqEsSYc1IJsOY5c0uX97_E/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ddUwLoqEsSYc1IJsOY5c0uX97_E/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ddUwLoqEsSYc1IJsOY5c0uX97_E/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/ddUwLoqEsSYc1IJsOY5c0uX97_E/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/J8Upz_h_CnU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">3</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/18/birds-like-youve-never-seen-them/</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
