<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Freakonomics</title><link>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com</link><description>New York Times Blog</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:58:36 PDT</lastBuildDate><generator>WordPress http://wordpress.org/</generator><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://www.freakonomics.com/blog/?feed=rss2" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://www.freakonomics.com/blog/?feed=rss2" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freakonomics.com%2Fblog%2F%3Ffeed%3Drss2" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><item><title>The World Wide Web Keeps it Local</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/Sj-GP57EDTk/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>baby names</category><category>the internet</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:58:36 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14861</guid><description>Rather than create a "global village," the Internet may have actually "shrunk people's horizons," reports an &lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=13940652"&gt;Economist article&lt;/a&gt; about a new study by Hebrew University researchers &lt;strong&gt;Jacob Goldenberg&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;Moshe Levy&lt;/strong&gt;. They used a common &lt;a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/07/if-i-name-my-daughter-ceo-will-she-become-one/"&gt;Freakonomics topic&lt;/a&gt; -- baby names -- to study how far ideas have spread since the advent of the Internet.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jHNR8tQot506wNFld_36zWfn-wM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jHNR8tQot506wNFld_36zWfn-wM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jHNR8tQot506wNFld_36zWfn-wM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/jHNR8tQot506wNFld_36zWfn-wM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/Sj-GP57EDTk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">7</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/the-world-wide-web-keeps-it-local/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>FREAK Shots: Big Macs on Fancy Plates</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/_90Omzjjcys/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>food</category><category>photography</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:26:15 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=15147</guid><description>On his website &lt;a href="http://www.fancyfastfood.com/page/2"&gt;Fancy Fast Food&lt;/a&gt;, designer and writer &lt;strong&gt;Erik Trinidad&lt;/strong&gt; revamps fast-food meals to look like plates you'd see at a five-star restaurant. 

His tagline: "Yeah, it's still bad for you -- but see how good it can look."
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/enGq-iyyZFj0dRLQv1rhscuqEjY/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/enGq-iyyZFj0dRLQv1rhscuqEjY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/enGq-iyyZFj0dRLQv1rhscuqEjY/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/enGq-iyyZFj0dRLQv1rhscuqEjY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/_90Omzjjcys" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/freak-shots-big-macs-on-fancy-plates/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Fertilizer Nudges</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/V_NzhiGKYX4/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Africa</category><category>environment</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:24:04 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14993</guid><description>We've &lt;a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/19/will-the-green-revolution-ever-hit-africa/"&gt;blogged before&lt;/a&gt; about the efforts of the international aid community to increase fertilizer use among small farmers in Africa. Many economists, however, believe that the subsidies often used to deliver the input are "distortionary, regressive, environmentally unsound, and ... result in politicized, inefficient distribution of fertilizer supply." A new &lt;a href="http://econ-www.mit.edu/files/4281"&gt;working paper&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;strong&gt;Esther Duflo&lt;/strong&gt;, &lt;strong&gt;Michael Kremer&lt;/strong&gt;, and &lt;strong&gt;Jonathan Robinson&lt;/strong&gt; examines the fertilizer-buying patterns of farmers in Western Kenya.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/AAueGWqQwSk006_Bje6EKG5O03M/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/AAueGWqQwSk006_Bje6EKG5O03M/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/AAueGWqQwSk006_Bje6EKG5O03M/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/AAueGWqQwSk006_Bje6EKG5O03M/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/V_NzhiGKYX4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/fertilizer-nudges/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Duty to Rescue and the Registry for Caregivers: A Guest Post</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/cBhOqSdLhxI/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>family</category><category>guest posts</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Stephen J. Dubner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:38:10 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=15175</guid><description>In two previous posts, we examined laws exempting family members from prosecution for harboring fugitives and laws either granting or permitting sentencing discounts on account of one's family status, ties, or responsibilities. These are two of the benefits defendants receive on account of their family status in the criminal justice system.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/EqaOqhaFbh0UuzFeGVixD7taw5M/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/EqaOqhaFbh0UuzFeGVixD7taw5M/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/EqaOqhaFbh0UuzFeGVixD7taw5M/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/EqaOqhaFbh0UuzFeGVixD7taw5M/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/cBhOqSdLhxI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">19</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/the-duty-to-rescue-and-the-registry-for-caregivers-a-guest-post/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Time for Tort Reform?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/ZCsHFP2OSN4/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>suing</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:34:14 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=15167</guid><description>A family in Saudi Arabia is &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/07/13/saudia.arabia.genie.suit/index.html?eref=rss_world"&gt;suing a genie&lt;/a&gt; for theft and harassment. The family accuses the genie of "leaving them threatening voicemails, stealing their cell phones, and hurling rocks at them when they leave the house."
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/GNOxjty5DbecGeoChoO3GIJbO5A/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/GNOxjty5DbecGeoChoO3GIJbO5A/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/GNOxjty5DbecGeoChoO3GIJbO5A/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/GNOxjty5DbecGeoChoO3GIJbO5A/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/ZCsHFP2OSN4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">16</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/time-for-tort-reform/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>For Sale: One Kidney?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/W4FOPGe3Xyg/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Kidneys</category><category>Organ donation</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:20:23 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=15113</guid><description>&lt;strong&gt;Virginia Postrel&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200907u/kidney-donation"&gt;examines&lt;/a&gt; the &lt;a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/tag/kidneys/"&gt;kidney donation&lt;/a&gt; system in the United States, where 11 people die every day waiting for a kidney transplant. Exchanging organs for payment is illegal in the U.S. although recent developments in organ exchanges, including &lt;a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/12/turning-one-kidney-into-ten/#more-4971"&gt;donation chains&lt;/a&gt;, have been successful. These innovations alone, however, won't solve the problem, and Postrel advocates a new system that includes both financial incentives and measures to protect donors.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/nQvOKT4HijTwvlYH_2YYg4RpE6Y/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/nQvOKT4HijTwvlYH_2YYg4RpE6Y/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/nQvOKT4HijTwvlYH_2YYg4RpE6Y/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/nQvOKT4HijTwvlYH_2YYg4RpE6Y/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/W4FOPGe3Xyg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">14</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/16/for-sale-one-kidney/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Do You Owe $23 Quadrillion?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/nh5odv-eE0Q/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>credit</category><category>debt</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:12:00 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=15063</guid><description>An unidentified computer glitch has led Visa to overcharge several of its cardholders for routine purchases at &lt;a href="http://consumerist.com/5314246/unruly-teen-charges-23-quadrillion-at-drugstore"&gt;drug stores&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2009/07/15/nh_man_charged_23148855308184500_plus_fee/"&gt;gas stations&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/spotlight/news-article.aspx?storyid=141665&amp;#038;catid=142"&gt;restaurants&lt;/a&gt;, to the tune of $23,148,855,308,184,500.00 each. These charges, as far as we can tell, exceed the sum total of wealth accumulated in human history.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/eadsiX25tGG8IQSUWZn7G2UowaM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/eadsiX25tGG8IQSUWZn7G2UowaM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/eadsiX25tGG8IQSUWZn7G2UowaM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/eadsiX25tGG8IQSUWZn7G2UowaM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/nh5odv-eE0Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">19</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/16/do-you-owe-23-quadrillion/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Quotes Uncovered: The Punchline, Please</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/f9rFs9DW28A/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>fred shapiro</category><category>quote</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Fred Shapiro</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:40:14 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=15125</guid><description>A while back,  I invited readers to submit quotations for which they wanted me to try to trace the origins, using &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Yale-Book-Quotations-Fred-Shapiro/dp/0300107986"&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Yale Book of Quotations&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and more recent research by me. Hundreds of people have responded via comments or e-mails. I am responding as best I can, a few per week.

&lt;strong&gt;Javy&lt;/strong&gt; asked:


&lt;blockquote&gt;Scientists (professors, physicians) will know more and more about less and less until they know everything about nothing, or will know less and less about more and more until they know nothing about everything.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lH40EkRtXvmhKhuHaocre9H4DEU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lH40EkRtXvmhKhuHaocre9H4DEU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lH40EkRtXvmhKhuHaocre9H4DEU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/lH40EkRtXvmhKhuHaocre9H4DEU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/f9rFs9DW28A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">4</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/16/quotes-uncovered-the-punchline-please/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Reducing Traffic by Closing Roads</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/hNIyzImjYMc/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>traffic</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:51:06 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=15075</guid><description>The city of Vancouver has turned one lane of traffic on the busy Burrard Bridge into a bicycle route. Critics predicted chaos, but the first day of the experiment found traffic moving smoothly. This seems to be in line with recent studies suggesting that road closures actually lead to fewer traffic jams.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Tax_Fhp5IVHvD7EMyykSUp0CObQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Tax_Fhp5IVHvD7EMyykSUp0CObQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Tax_Fhp5IVHvD7EMyykSUp0CObQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/Tax_Fhp5IVHvD7EMyykSUp0CObQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/hNIyzImjYMc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">33</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/16/reducing-traffic-by-closing-roads/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Can't NASA Find a Better Launch Site?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/ZnMPXAzDW04/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>NASA</category><category>space</category><category>weather</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:41:50 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=15119</guid><description>After bad weather foiled several launch attempts, the Space Shuttle Endeavor finally &lt;a href="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/space/orl-bk-space-shuttle-launch-endeavour-071509,0,4027736.story"&gt;took off last night&lt;/a&gt; from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida's Cape Canaveral. With stormy weather so typical there, why does NASA continue to use it as a launch site?
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/KbWRP2ZKYgOTSpUm0pkyQURveSs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/KbWRP2ZKYgOTSpUm0pkyQURveSs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/KbWRP2ZKYgOTSpUm0pkyQURveSs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/KbWRP2ZKYgOTSpUm0pkyQURveSs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/ZnMPXAzDW04" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">16</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/16/cant-nasa-find-a-better-launch-site/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Crime, Punishment, and Typewriter Tape</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/tJUKIcKaMi4/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Technology</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:30:36 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=15035</guid><description>Just because a technology has been superseded doesn't make it &lt;a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2008/10/typewriter-unde.html"&gt;completely irrelevant&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/S1cbdGFcaG4uV5KpIEtcVlkzodk/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/S1cbdGFcaG4uV5KpIEtcVlkzodk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/S1cbdGFcaG4uV5KpIEtcVlkzodk/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/S1cbdGFcaG4uV5KpIEtcVlkzodk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/tJUKIcKaMi4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">19</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/crime-punishment-and-typewriter-tape/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Make It a Taedonggang River Beer</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/cmlNXGEdEnI/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Advertising</category><category>beer</category><category>North Korea</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:47:01 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14959</guid><description>North Korea has come out with its &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8132199.stm"&gt;first beer commercial&lt;/a&gt; for Taedong River Beer, "the pride of Pyongyang," which shows both Western businessmen and a sweaty worker in uniform enjoying a cold one.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/vmBhSYL0GKS29-9isq26fMX3oSw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/vmBhSYL0GKS29-9isq26fMX3oSw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/vmBhSYL0GKS29-9isq26fMX3oSw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/vmBhSYL0GKS29-9isq26fMX3oSw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/cmlNXGEdEnI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">12</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/make-it-a-taedong-river-beer/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Sentencing Discounts for Parents? A Guest Post</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/ab8Sq6pD9uw/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>family</category><category>prison</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Stephen J. Dubner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 05:59:20 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14219</guid><description>&lt;strong&gt;Should Parents Who Offend Receive Sentencing Discounts?
A Guest Post 
By Jennifer Collins, Ethan J. Leib, and Dan Markel&lt;/strong&gt;

Many states expressly tell judges to calibrate a sentence based, in part, on one's family ties and responsibilities in sentencing offenders.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/FiZPX0l7hSKcRS22jPJXbxQfQY4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/FiZPX0l7hSKcRS22jPJXbxQfQY4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/FiZPX0l7hSKcRS22jPJXbxQfQY4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/FiZPX0l7hSKcRS22jPJXbxQfQY4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/ab8Sq6pD9uw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">15</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/sentencing-discounts-for-parents-a-guest-post/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Cash for Cells</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/EGPgzMgdA5g/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>recycling</category><category>Technology</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:45:36 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=14889</guid><description>Raise your hand if you have a drawer filled with old cell phones just waiting to be responsibly recycled. Keep your hand up if most of those phones have been in the drawer for over a year. Of the 160 million cell phones discarded annually, 75 percent of them end up in drawers or trash cans. A new company, &lt;a href="http://www.cycledcells.com/index.php"&gt;Cycled Cells&lt;/a&gt;, takes in old cell phones, sometimes paying for them, and either recycles the phones or, if they can be rehabilitated, distributes them to phone-needy people around the world. They even pay for postage.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/nIN4NI8HZaUIoKF9GezxSbmLAFc/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/nIN4NI8HZaUIoKF9GezxSbmLAFc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/nIN4NI8HZaUIoKF9GezxSbmLAFc/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/nIN4NI8HZaUIoKF9GezxSbmLAFc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/EGPgzMgdA5g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">19</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/cash-for-cells/</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Greening the Brothel</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~3/8ncR-WK8JV0/</link><category>Uncategorized</category><category>environment</category><category>Prostitution</category><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">By Freakonomics</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:42:09 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=15023</guid><description>Mason d'Envie, a brothel in Berlin, &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSTRE56C4SV20090713"&gt;offers discounts&lt;/a&gt; to customers who arrive by bike or public transportation.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/kmX6nkrr8UFJveHdx16fJLuDjJs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/kmX6nkrr8UFJveHdx16fJLuDjJs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/kmX6nkrr8UFJveHdx16fJLuDjJs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~at/kmX6nkrr8UFJveHdx16fJLuDjJs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/FreakonomicsBlog/~4/8ncR-WK8JV0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">8</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/greening-the-brothel/</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
