http://www.freelists.org/list/thin Archive of posts for thin at FreeLists http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/4UITgxLmF8Y/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,10 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,10 Yep, the irony is that unless you make changes the server dynamically sets up these system memory allocations at startup. So if you have a 64GB server, it's memory allocation in the 2GB kernel memory space will be different to that of a 16GB server. Therefore you think you're on the right track by pumping more memory in, but what you've actually done is handicap it..if you know what I mean. So if you do no memory tuning at all, you may find you get equal or better ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/agNhNFizWsfohKFuWDq3pA-Jl6E/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/agNhNFizWsfohKFuWDq3pA-Jl6E/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/agNhNFizWsfohKFuWDq3pA-Jl6E/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/agNhNFizWsfohKFuWDq3pA-Jl6E/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/4UITgxLmF8Y" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,10 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/7qq1VYpXDag/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,9 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,9 Ooh, now that's interesting! There's been some argument here as to what the default pool limit is and I guess that solves it (I win!) :) We've tried setting it to max, but that was on a 64G server which just went into a boot up BSOD loop. Until this week, it was the only server that was dying, but now some 16G servers are doing it, so we'll definitely give this a go. Thanks, Andrew ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AVfaq0DFSHttyZDxR162bTrnDWs/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AVfaq0DFSHttyZDxR162bTrnDWs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AVfaq0DFSHttyZDxR162bTrnDWs/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AVfaq0DFSHttyZDxR162bTrnDWs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/7qq1VYpXDag" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,9 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/oeq0RBkGHVY/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003,5 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003,5 You're welcome Mark. You are allowed to call me Jeremy J I've not seen that shortcut issue. Is this running the Silverlight.exe? My deployment script has a cleanup task to remove the Silverlight folder from the Start Menu. ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rME6YNym7CYxHLOFdahhrpo1gKs/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rME6YNym7CYxHLOFdahhrpo1gKs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rME6YNym7CYxHLOFdahhrpo1gKs/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rME6YNym7CYxHLOFdahhrpo1gKs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/oeq0RBkGHVY" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003,5 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/lj7xfA7xV6I/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,8 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,8 Hi Andrew, Have you played with the PoolUsageMaximum and PagedPoolSize values? Here's some info from my adm template you can use and play with the values: ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7m0WlN4DPFnKyM-HutwBgr8G4SA/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7m0WlN4DPFnKyM-HutwBgr8G4SA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7m0WlN4DPFnKyM-HutwBgr8G4SA/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7m0WlN4DPFnKyM-HutwBgr8G4SA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/lj7xfA7xV6I" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,8 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/wjQxHlgvhXs/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003,4 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003,4 So I tried the keys and that does work! Thank you Mr. Saunders. However, Every time the Silverlight app pops up and I run local install it asks whether I want a shortcut on the Start menu or desktop. If I click one it runs great. However my guess is that these short cuts are getting written to the profile. Should I assume this is an option the programmer needs to change? Many thanks guys... ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/B_21SQDBprU8dsTZj4d4wg22bWE/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/B_21SQDBprU8dsTZj4d4wg22bWE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/B_21SQDBprU8dsTZj4d4wg22bWE/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/B_21SQDBprU8dsTZj4d4wg22bWE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/wjQxHlgvhXs" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003,4 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/FKcuUFe4DSs/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003,3 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003,3 Great I will try the reg keys... So when you publish the Silverlight application....what does your CMD line look like? Thanks, M ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pO7tKlZ5qtfPwLxyA7-moZyEtdc/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pO7tKlZ5qtfPwLxyA7-moZyEtdc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pO7tKlZ5qtfPwLxyA7-moZyEtdc/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pO7tKlZ5qtfPwLxyA7-moZyEtdc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/FKcuUFe4DSs" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003,3 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/dvi8xcExuIw/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003,2 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003,2 Yep, it's very simple. Get the latest version of Silverlight from: You can silently install it using /q Verify your Silverlight installation at: ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gD_ByDt_HpQoV-P7H3cy46ODofA/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gD_ByDt_HpQoV-P7H3cy46ODofA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gD_ByDt_HpQoV-P7H3cy46ODofA/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gD_ByDt_HpQoV-P7H3cy46ODofA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/dvi8xcExuIw" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003,2 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/i_6mo992DDw/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003,1 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003,1 I have only had to install the Silverlight software while in /install mode, change to /execute and had no trouble with users running the web app. To me it is just like Flash but without all the security risks and frequent updates. Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/zmoOXHEhM_2ke_KpfrYCcaJ_8I8/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/zmoOXHEhM_2ke_KpfrYCcaJ_8I8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/zmoOXHEhM_2ke_KpfrYCcaJ_8I8/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/zmoOXHEhM_2ke_KpfrYCcaJ_8I8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/i_6mo992DDw" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003,1 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/EGDImaJy1DU/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003 We finally have a Silverlight 5 application that I can publish in my farm. I was hoping someone in the list could point me in the right direction and answer a few questions. The App is provided by a web page and upon opening it asks if you want to run the web version or the local install. Can I assume that this software runs like the Adobe Flash component... whereas I install it on the server and then let the user run the web page? I ask because I tried it and I seem to have run into a permissions issue. Does ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0CTEgQOVjzAI6PcwSjy5j6gHEVw/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0CTEgQOVjzAI6PcwSjy5j6gHEVw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0CTEgQOVjzAI6PcwSjy5j6gHEVw/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0CTEgQOVjzAI6PcwSjy5j6gHEVw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/EGDImaJy1DU" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Silverlight-5-on-XenApp-50-windows-2003 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/zS0SpkIh7Og/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,7 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,7 Hi Jeremy That's our suspicion, but we've no idea what to monitor to prove this! We in the Citrix team have been dying to get onto 2008R2 for a while now (hi Andy :) ). And yep, all users use this app (we're actually an ASP). The only real separation we have is on office versions. Andrew ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/UY2Db-z5NhygjyEdub-ClztfBXc/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/UY2Db-z5NhygjyEdub-ClztfBXc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/UY2Db-z5NhygjyEdub-ClztfBXc/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/UY2Db-z5NhygjyEdub-ClztfBXc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/zS0SpkIh7Og" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,7 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/951VcCiPLsA/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,6 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,6 Carl, how do we know if we've hit the limit? From what I've read we should be seeing more events if we had hit it? Users that are already on are fine, it's just new users that can't get on which have an issue. Load balancing sees a quiet server so then directs everyone to it until we take it out! Andrew On May 29, 2012 3:17 PM, Webster webster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/n8gn__awebcHtkFv0r-WspQiDTs/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/n8gn__awebcHtkFv0r-WspQiDTs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/n8gn__awebcHtkFv0r-WspQiDTs/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/n8gn__awebcHtkFv0r-WspQiDTs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/951VcCiPLsA" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,6 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/kZSbNAXsWS8/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,5 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,5 At the end of the day it doesn't matter what you do, you're hitting the 2GB kernel memory limit of 32-bit Windows. Whilst you can tweak the crap out of that memory space, and change all sorts of settings, you're only ever robbing Peter to pay Paul, so to speak. You may be lucky enough to squeeze one or two more users on the box with stability, but you're really achieving little for the effort you'll go to. Insufficient memory resources is the result of 32-bit saturation. If you must stay with a 32-bit farm, build more servers and tweak the load evaluator. ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N8oo0nWZgXdxD71TRJhahTYawMU/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N8oo0nWZgXdxD71TRJhahTYawMU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N8oo0nWZgXdxD71TRJhahTYawMU/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N8oo0nWZgXdxD71TRJhahTYawMU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/kZSbNAXsWS8" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,5 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/AvU1qqIiKjI/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,4 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,4 Per process. If it's only 140k on a system that's gone west then yes, your problem ain't the same one I've experienced. On 29 May 2012 15:44, Dogers dogers@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Is that 80000 per process or per system? Nothing near that high per process, but the systems are way higher than that! One that's gone today is at 140k total, another that hasn't is at 221k total.. ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/TzQm_cx8o-sGYFF5P5wyzGFbId8/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/TzQm_cx8o-sGYFF5P5wyzGFbId8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/TzQm_cx8o-sGYFF5P5wyzGFbId8/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/TzQm_cx8o-sGYFF5P5wyzGFbId8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/AvU1qqIiKjI" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,4 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/oUwZb81qnM8/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,3 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,3 Is that 80000 per process or per system? Nothing near that high per process, but the systems are way higher than that! One that's gone today is at 140k total, another that hasn't is at 221k total.. Andrew On May 29, 2012 3:15 PM, James Rankin kz20fl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GbqFacxlcTr8REgjwX_Jikhwcss/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GbqFacxlcTr8REgjwX_Jikhwcss/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GbqFacxlcTr8REgjwX_Jikhwcss/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GbqFacxlcTr8REgjwX_Jikhwcss/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/oUwZb81qnM8" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,3 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/Gh_335p2XVE/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,2 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,2 Check your paged pool and non-paged pool resources. I see that a lot on 2003 Enterprise. Plenty of RAM but you have run out of one or both of the pool resources. Thanks Carl Webster ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7aMmooPcAUgZth5WE-QYLxllZgo/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7aMmooPcAUgZth5WE-QYLxllZgo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7aMmooPcAUgZth5WE-QYLxllZgo/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7aMmooPcAUgZth5WE-QYLxllZgo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/Gh_335p2XVE" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,2 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/2sMGKyPNHx8/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,1 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,1 I've very occasionally seen that insufficient system resources on 2003 and older platforms when something is leaking memory handles. Might be an idea to see what the handle utilization is per process. Generally anything hitting 80,000+ is a bit on the high side on 2003. FWIW, I've never seen issues due to handle leaks on 2008 R2 so far. On 29 May 2012 15:00, Dogers dogers@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Hi all! ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qVA343QMLbY215Csl_kI1Z5Ar6M/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qVA343QMLbY215Csl_kI1Z5Ar6M/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qVA343QMLbY215Csl_kI1Z5Ar6M/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qVA343QMLbY215Csl_kI1Z5Ar6M/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/2sMGKyPNHx8" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted,1 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/5uYPPG_Z-jY/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted Hi all! We've got an issue here that we're a bit lost with so I'm hoping someone may have an idea.. We're (still) running XenApp5 Enterprise on 2003 Enterprise 32bit at the moment and are getting issues recently with the odd server failing to log users on with a 1508/1505 event ID stating Windows was unable to load the registry. This is often caused by insufficient memory or insufficient security rights. and DETAIL - Insufficient system resources exist to ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ND3-bup1lPWLRhXGcCgVbgUu5PY/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ND3-bup1lPWLRhXGcCgVbgUu5PY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ND3-bup1lPWLRhXGcCgVbgUu5PY/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ND3-bup1lPWLRhXGcCgVbgUu5PY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/5uYPPG_Z-jY" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Citrix-Server-Resources-Exhausted http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/__Y2WaDuJBk/edgesight-load-testing,2 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/edgesight-load-testing,2 Cheers James! From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [] On Behalf Of James Scanlon Sent: Thursday, 24 May 2012 3:40 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: edgesight load testing Alan, Check the Fail Action for any of the synchronization points are not set to ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/d4G8sAMfFI4IyR3eq88j3sCOXXM/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/d4G8sAMfFI4IyR3eq88j3sCOXXM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/d4G8sAMfFI4IyR3eq88j3sCOXXM/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/d4G8sAMfFI4IyR3eq88j3sCOXXM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/__Y2WaDuJBk" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/edgesight-load-testing,2 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/F1n7naqd9m4/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error,5 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error,5 I just installed the latest AC hotfix I could find, 6.2.0.151. We'll see if that helps. For reference, I do not have XenApp installed on these Win2k8 R2 servers. Thanks, ________________________________________ Hector Minero ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/kbJ_NMcSNhNSW2iC7bp-3Wp45Bo/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/kbJ_NMcSNhNSW2iC7bp-3Wp45Bo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/kbJ_NMcSNhNSW2iC7bp-3Wp45Bo/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/kbJ_NMcSNhNSW2iC7bp-3Wp45Bo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/F1n7naqd9m4" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error,5 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/AldV2dn-JWM/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error,4 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error,4 You must be talking about some different Enterprise E-Mail! On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Steve Snyder kwajalein@xxxxxxxxx wrote: thankfully enterprise e-mail makes up for inconveniences... ;) On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rich Alexander rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxwrote: I have nothing but problems with 2008 R2 XenApp 6, and CAC. ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IqsHVbnw_motW5uyAH-cMco8BHY/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IqsHVbnw_motW5uyAH-cMco8BHY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IqsHVbnw_motW5uyAH-cMco8BHY/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/IqsHVbnw_motW5uyAH-cMco8BHY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/AldV2dn-JWM" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error,4 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/Y60pQF9WndE/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error,3 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error,3 thankfully enterprise e-mail makes up for inconveniences... ;) On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rich Alexander rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxwrote: I have nothing but problems with 2008 R2 XenApp 6, and CAC. My current setup is to run a batch file every 10 minutes: c:\mail\pskill /accepteula logonui net stop CtxSmartCardSvc ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tpmdvWSe40QX0Ws-6BdW9Pxhlr0/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tpmdvWSe40QX0Ws-6BdW9Pxhlr0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tpmdvWSe40QX0Ws-6BdW9Pxhlr0/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tpmdvWSe40QX0Ws-6BdW9Pxhlr0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/Y60pQF9WndE" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error,3 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/dKh7AS0qTuA/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error,2 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error,2 I have nothing but problems with 2008 R2 XenApp 6, and CAC. My current setup is to run a batch file every 10 minutes: c:\mail\pskill /accepteula logonui net stop CtxSmartCardSvc net start CtxSmartCardSvc net stop CitrixCseEngine net start CitrixCseEngine net start server ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uo67gLupELJVTmMuJtfghMntOpc/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uo67gLupELJVTmMuJtfghMntOpc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uo67gLupELJVTmMuJtfghMntOpc/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uo67gLupELJVTmMuJtfghMntOpc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/dKh7AS0qTuA" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error,2 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/esU3nJcLLV4/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error,1 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error,1 I vaguely recall having something like this happen (2K8x64) seems like an ACG patch was the final cure - seems like it was 128k oberthauer CACs that were doing it On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Minero, Hector B CIV NSWCDD, K55 hector.minero@xxxxxxxx wrote: Hi all, I have some Windows 2008 R2 terminal servers that report the following errors when any user tries to log in: ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/66kgGFzcowOdHxPB5XE1mPzsvi4/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/66kgGFzcowOdHxPB5XE1mPzsvi4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/66kgGFzcowOdHxPB5XE1mPzsvi4/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/66kgGFzcowOdHxPB5XE1mPzsvi4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/esU3nJcLLV4" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error,1 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/ngZTt2TPc48/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error Hi all, I have some Windows 2008 R2 terminal servers that report the following errors when any user tries to log in: The system could not log you on. An error occurred trying to use this smart card. You can find further details in the event log. Please report this error to the System Administrator. This happens every few days, and the only thing that can fix it is a reboot. ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/n3VNRPIFGVVFuEJbF-QDqG-OSbg/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/n3VNRPIFGVVFuEJbF-QDqG-OSbg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/n3VNRPIFGVVFuEJbF-QDqG-OSbg/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/n3VNRPIFGVVFuEJbF-QDqG-OSbg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/ngZTt2TPc48" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Windows-2008-R2-and-smart-card-error http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/eMJsWF0OPK4/Remote-Desktop-Connection-Client,1 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Remote-Desktop-Connection-Client,1 If you are connecting to a 2008 Terminal Server, the user is prompted for credentials on the client (default). The credentials are then passed to the Terminal Server. If you are connecting to a Windows 2003 Terminal server, the user is prompted for credentials on the server. It opens an RDP connection to the server, and then it prompts for credentials. ________________________________________ ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KQnjo6pxAjKYAu89_xE2mjKLxsY/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KQnjo6pxAjKYAu89_xE2mjKLxsY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KQnjo6pxAjKYAu89_xE2mjKLxsY/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KQnjo6pxAjKYAu89_xE2mjKLxsY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/eMJsWF0OPK4" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Remote-Desktop-Connection-Client,1 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/f9gw6oZRZ2w/edgesight-load-testing,1 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/edgesight-load-testing,1 Alan, Check the Fail Action for any of the synchronization points are not set to 'logout' Obviously you can change where you need / want - but this is always a pain if not set correctly... ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SEe8v-gXt7PpWWVGuJPGGbi6f6g/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SEe8v-gXt7PpWWVGuJPGGbi6f6g/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SEe8v-gXt7PpWWVGuJPGGbi6f6g/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SEe8v-gXt7PpWWVGuJPGGbi6f6g/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/f9gw6oZRZ2w" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/edgesight-load-testing,1 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/kDn9R0hl2C8/edgesight-load-testing http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/edgesight-load-testing Hi All, I have just downloaded and started to try and user the load testing tool, however my scripts keep timing out and crashing with only a little load on them and the CPU and memory monitors are not extremely high so Im not sure why Im having these issues? Also does anyone know how to loop a process in the tool and lastly if someone has some already created office2010 scripts that I can use that be great? ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/K7VoS4GoaQCbiiGZ977Uvz1v2oc/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/K7VoS4GoaQCbiiGZ977Uvz1v2oc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/K7VoS4GoaQCbiiGZ977Uvz1v2oc/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/K7VoS4GoaQCbiiGZ977Uvz1v2oc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/kDn9R0hl2C8" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/edgesight-load-testing http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/9mgM7F-xWDc/Remote-Desktop-Connection-Client http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Remote-Desktop-Connection-Client Im having trouble understanding what is meant in (v=ws.10).aspx where it says If you enable this policy setting, a user will be prompted on the client computerinstead of on the terminal serverto provide credentials for a remote connection to a terminal server in the section for *Prompt for credentials on the client computer**. If the user is prompted on the client computer instead of the terminal server, whats it authenticating against? And the last line in that section discusses the difference between 2008 and previous versions, it says for server 2008 the user will be prompted on the client to provide creds for the remote connection.* ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dYr_NXBdVzV2PCiDlHVf4zUq2DU/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dYr_NXBdVzV2PCiDlHVf4zUq2DU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dYr_NXBdVzV2PCiDlHVf4zUq2DU/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dYr_NXBdVzV2PCiDlHVf4zUq2DU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/9mgM7F-xWDc" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Remote-Desktop-Connection-Client http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/gpIv61W6xhs/old-Terminal-Server-Analyzer-software,2 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/old-Terminal-Server-Analyzer-software,2 Many thanks Webster! M From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [] On Behalf Of Webster Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:30 PM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: old Terminal Server Analyzer software? ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q68YZrQfHtiEi2pbehNtv1ztG3I/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q68YZrQfHtiEi2pbehNtv1ztG3I/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q68YZrQfHtiEi2pbehNtv1ztG3I/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q68YZrQfHtiEi2pbehNtv1ztG3I/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/gpIv61W6xhs" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/old-Terminal-Server-Analyzer-software,2 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/EwHi3K5SDFY/old-Terminal-Server-Analyzer-software,1 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/old-Terminal-Server-Analyzer-software,1 I believe that has morphed (or been assimilated) into the Microsoft Application Compatibility Toolkit. Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z9DF-fyFVBJYl80heEPP5Cu_LJ0/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z9DF-fyFVBJYl80heEPP5Cu_LJ0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z9DF-fyFVBJYl80heEPP5Cu_LJ0/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z9DF-fyFVBJYl80heEPP5Cu_LJ0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/EwHi3K5SDFY" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/old-Terminal-Server-Analyzer-software,1 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/-ldfxw5Cveg/old-Terminal-Server-Analyzer-software http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/old-Terminal-Server-Analyzer-software Does anyone out there have a copy of the old Terminal Server Analyzer software mentioned in the below to links: ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/V0OxedrlxARq9A6831ABjk1K-ok/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/V0OxedrlxARq9A6831ABjk1K-ok/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/V0OxedrlxARq9A6831ABjk1K-ok/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/V0OxedrlxARq9A6831ABjk1K-ok/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/-ldfxw5Cveg" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/old-Terminal-Server-Analyzer-software http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/udp0AAjn-PM/Load-Balancing-RDP,7 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP,7 Joe is a GREAT teacher. Just pay him in Sushi and he is a very happy man. :) Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [] On Behalf Of Matt Kosht Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:18 PM ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ILc0pQjMzdE1KddHKo4o7CdfSoA/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ILc0pQjMzdE1KddHKo4o7CdfSoA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ILc0pQjMzdE1KddHKo4o7CdfSoA/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ILc0pQjMzdE1KddHKo4o7CdfSoA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/udp0AAjn-PM" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP,7 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/XcUDOnY0ic8/Load-Balancing-RDP,6 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP,6 Sounds like the way to go for simple no extra cost load balancing. Thanks for schooling me AGAIN Joe :) On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Minero, Hector B CIV NSWCDD, K55 hector.minero@xxxxxxxx wrote: Connection broker is what I needed. I am currently testing it. Thanks for your help. I checked out F5, but it seemed like an overkill for what I needed, and it's pretty expensive, too. ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fEgB8Oag004r3QKxsbbP0Cly4zM/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fEgB8Oag004r3QKxsbbP0Cly4zM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fEgB8Oag004r3QKxsbbP0Cly4zM/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fEgB8Oag004r3QKxsbbP0Cly4zM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/XcUDOnY0ic8" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP,6 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/74o-pNRYKHM/Load-Balancing-RDP,5 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP,5 Connection broker is what I needed. I am currently testing it. Thanks for your help. I checked out F5, but it seemed like an overkill for what I needed, and it's pretty expensive, too. ________________________________________ Hector Minero ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-RxLvMDtgC34uCWN9Hj-btGsnSQ/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-RxLvMDtgC34uCWN9Hj-btGsnSQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-RxLvMDtgC34uCWN9Hj-btGsnSQ/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-RxLvMDtgC34uCWN9Hj-btGsnSQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/74o-pNRYKHM" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP,5 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/y5UV3tDTilY/Load-Balancing-RDP,4 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP,4 The connection broker is strictly load balancing on the number of RDP sessions vs. network traffic or other load factors? On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Joe Shonk joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx wrote: Its built into R2. Its the connection broker. Joe On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Minero, Hector B CIV NSWCDD, K55 ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/MgT6iWSDt02gHWRPKwhvLIVXeTg/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/MgT6iWSDt02gHWRPKwhvLIVXeTg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/MgT6iWSDt02gHWRPKwhvLIVXeTg/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/MgT6iWSDt02gHWRPKwhvLIVXeTg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/y5UV3tDTilY" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP,4 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/ByvS_uG11nM/Load-Balancing-RDP,3 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP,3 Will it work for local RDP sessions? No Web Access, in other words just a regular local RDP connection. _______________________________ Hector Minero NSWCDD K55 Ph:(540)653-8859 -----Original Message----- From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [] On Behalf Of ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SHyWixkIGc3Acr3av4aU1tS3rm4/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SHyWixkIGc3Acr3av4aU1tS3rm4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SHyWixkIGc3Acr3av4aU1tS3rm4/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SHyWixkIGc3Acr3av4aU1tS3rm4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/ByvS_uG11nM" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP,3 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/7_LznNco4pQ/Load-Balancing-RDP,2 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP,2 Its built into R2. Its the connection broker. Joe On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Minero, Hector B CIV NSWCDD, K55 hector.minero@xxxxxxxx wrote: Hi all: Is there a way to do load balancing in Windows 2008 R2 Terminal Servers, without using Citrix? DNS round robin is not good enough. ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hltzPdumOr6LmgjYuGeK8AoH9ng/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hltzPdumOr6LmgjYuGeK8AoH9ng/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hltzPdumOr6LmgjYuGeK8AoH9ng/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hltzPdumOr6LmgjYuGeK8AoH9ng/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/7_LznNco4pQ" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP,2 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/g1bBsDJEO5I/Load-Balancing-RDP,1 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP,1 You could use Microsoft NLB to balance on network load. If you have the means I would recommend a hardware load balancer like an F5 vs. the software one. -Matt On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Minero, Hector B CIV NSWCDD, K55 hector.minero@xxxxxxxx wrote: ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yH5-rWR6F-lOIrek9hSgAh4Knf8/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yH5-rWR6F-lOIrek9hSgAh4Knf8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yH5-rWR6F-lOIrek9hSgAh4Knf8/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yH5-rWR6F-lOIrek9hSgAh4Knf8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/g1bBsDJEO5I" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP,1 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/PCY9h93_2sw/OT-Printer-publishing-in-AD http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/OT-Printer-publishing-in-AD Hi ya, I have been looking at publishing our print servers to two different OU's to control access via AD group. ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N_JODVA8AzwGE3qjPX_wLRtXmfg/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N_JODVA8AzwGE3qjPX_wLRtXmfg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N_JODVA8AzwGE3qjPX_wLRtXmfg/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/N_JODVA8AzwGE3qjPX_wLRtXmfg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/PCY9h93_2sw" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/OT-Printer-publishing-in-AD http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/-Ywxu7fTvfs/Load-Balancing-RDP http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP Hi all: Is there a way to do load balancing in Windows 2008 R2 Terminal Servers, without using Citrix? DNS round robin is not good enough. Thanks, _______________________________ Hector Minero ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GEPwKq_JGWED8ZPJKsilFQvtg4I/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GEPwKq_JGWED8ZPJKsilFQvtg4I/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GEPwKq_JGWED8ZPJKsilFQvtg4I/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GEPwKq_JGWED8ZPJKsilFQvtg4I/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/-Ywxu7fTvfs" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Load-Balancing-RDP http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/pjnTZylb1ws/Filter-WI-54-on-Description,1 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Filter-WI-54-on-Description,1 Has anyone had any success with filtering Apps for aggregated farms on WI 5.4?? From: scanjam@xxxxxxxxxxx To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Filter WI 5.4 on Description Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 23:42:39 +1000 ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EJqxKmQwtHmHuTVGR5E5q8NZw3g/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EJqxKmQwtHmHuTVGR5E5q8NZw3g/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EJqxKmQwtHmHuTVGR5E5q8NZw3g/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EJqxKmQwtHmHuTVGR5E5q8NZw3g/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/pjnTZylb1ws" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Filter-WI-54-on-Description,1 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/VcFmzSfwvU4/Epicor,2 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Epicor,2 hmmmm. there have been problems there. Thanks On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Raffensberger, Stephen D sraffens@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Hi Greg, I don't have any specific help but maybe I can point you in the right direction. We had a similar issue with logins over VPN. Somebody closed a port that made Windows authentication take longer. Surprisingly, this slower ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-BPu86yZiHKgBFNZkKW9KaXndtk/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-BPu86yZiHKgBFNZkKW9KaXndtk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-BPu86yZiHKgBFNZkKW9KaXndtk/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-BPu86yZiHKgBFNZkKW9KaXndtk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/VcFmzSfwvU4" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Epicor,2 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/Q_6G_pIxYp0/Epicor,1 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Epicor,1 Hi Greg, I don't have any specific help but maybe I can point you in the right direction. We had a similar issue with logins over VPN. Somebody closed a port that made Windows authentication take longer. Surprisingly, this slower authentication affected printer mapping. Users with only one printer worked okay while users with 12 printers took upwards of 5 minutes to log in. So you might look for things that affect authentication like DNS problems or ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dsciwGmFDK3WIAlaIq2KEwPkXBY/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dsciwGmFDK3WIAlaIq2KEwPkXBY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dsciwGmFDK3WIAlaIq2KEwPkXBY/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/dsciwGmFDK3WIAlaIq2KEwPkXBY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/Q_6G_pIxYp0" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Epicor,1 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/iutw20MDJf4/Epicor http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Epicor seeing some weirdness with Epicor on Windows 2003 and PS 4.5. There seems to be a long delay for some users and the time it takes for printer creation to occur which cause Epicor to not recognize the have a printer installed. Anyone run into this before? Some users are fine (most are). The affected users are fine on another workstation. Which tells me it is a client issue, but I still ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fj0-O99D_FxbQWwPgYdIcBdVaes/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fj0-O99D_FxbQWwPgYdIcBdVaes/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fj0-O99D_FxbQWwPgYdIcBdVaes/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/fj0-O99D_FxbQWwPgYdIcBdVaes/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/iutw20MDJf4" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Epicor http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/vrZYC9TyN_w/Filter-WI-54-on-Description http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Filter-WI-54-on-Description Any had any success with Filtering Apps based on description for WI 5.4? Ive followed - And had no success - even tried the suggestions in the comments. When changing the files the site completely error's out... We are tryign to combine old 5.0 farm with our new 6.5 farm but the new farm will ONLY run our core desktop apps (which of course exist on the old ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EHb2ztfSLJBsOt4S1DvccOAUEfk/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EHb2ztfSLJBsOt4S1DvccOAUEfk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EHb2ztfSLJBsOt4S1DvccOAUEfk/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EHb2ztfSLJBsOt4S1DvccOAUEfk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/vrZYC9TyN_w" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/Filter-WI-54-on-Description http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/ZF88nA6B4TM/automated-response,106 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/automated-response,106 Greetings, I will be out of the office today (5/17) returning tomorrow. Thanks, Rich ************************************************ For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3L8nzW_RETWEaGfNbyrwlY1SFms/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3L8nzW_RETWEaGfNbyrwlY1SFms/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3L8nzW_RETWEaGfNbyrwlY1SFms/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3L8nzW_RETWEaGfNbyrwlY1SFms/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/ZF88nA6B4TM" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/automated-response,106 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/qY8a2EAlPUM/PVS-deployed-image-no-seamless-apps,12 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/PVS-deployed-image-no-seamless-apps,12 OK, we'll try that. Thanks. From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [] On Behalf Of Joe Shonk Sent: woensdag 16 mei 2012 18:30 To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: PVS deployed image - no seamless apps We've been deploying PVS 6.0 and 6.1 with XA6.5 on ESX using the VMXNET3 drivers with success. For 6.1, you do need installed the Microsoft Hotfix ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/M037TmbXk1YNsXKFX9275mF4fFw/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/M037TmbXk1YNsXKFX9275mF4fFw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/M037TmbXk1YNsXKFX9275mF4fFw/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/M037TmbXk1YNsXKFX9275mF4fFw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/qY8a2EAlPUM" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/PVS-deployed-image-no-seamless-apps,12 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/qKJ8CexrtA8/PVS-deployed-image-no-seamless-apps,11 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/PVS-deployed-image-no-seamless-apps,11 We've been deploying PVS 6.0 and 6.1 with XA6.5 on ESX using the VMXNET3 drivers with success. For 6.1, you do need installed the Microsoft Hotfix before installing 6.1 target agent. The CTX128160 hotfix is built into the PVS Target installation starting with 6.0. Joe On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Erik Blom (telenet) erik.blom@xxxxxxxxxxwrote: ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jWzaklenhM3GVqisnyLijpECxI8/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jWzaklenhM3GVqisnyLijpECxI8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jWzaklenhM3GVqisnyLijpECxI8/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jWzaklenhM3GVqisnyLijpECxI8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/qKJ8CexrtA8" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/PVS-deployed-image-no-seamless-apps,11 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/bmwGGA1O9tw/PVS-deployed-image-no-seamless-apps,10 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/PVS-deployed-image-no-seamless-apps,10 I think I found it... The customer insisted that we use VMXNet3 adapters, even for the PVS adapter. So we needed to install CTX128160 and MS kb2550978 to avoid BSOD's while booting from the PVS image. It appears that one of these hotfixes broke seamless application publishing. So now we're back to using E1000 for the PVS side and VMXNET3 for the production side. First tests look ok... If this is the case, I wonder why no one else has experienced this. Maybe everyone uses E1000 for the PVs side. ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/12DqcoUBAcNvx3eJ-3gHIaLrvZY/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/12DqcoUBAcNvx3eJ-3gHIaLrvZY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/12DqcoUBAcNvx3eJ-3gHIaLrvZY/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/12DqcoUBAcNvx3eJ-3gHIaLrvZY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/bmwGGA1O9tw" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/PVS-deployed-image-no-seamless-apps,10 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~3/4ut0ye0ralw/PVS-deployed-image-no-seamless-apps,9 http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/PVS-deployed-image-no-seamless-apps,9 you're doing a POC right? Maybe just remove it completely and see what happens. Then add it back once you see the results you want. Are you getting formal support form Citrix for your POC? On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Saravanan Srinivasan sarav2k@xxxxxxxxx wrote: We were told to reinstall the Edgesight client. ________________________________ From: Erik Blom (telenet) erik.blom@xxxxxxxxxx ... <p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7Tx7yks9o4YAuhINJuhqWSkKMqY/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7Tx7yks9o4YAuhINJuhqWSkKMqY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/> <a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7Tx7yks9o4YAuhINJuhqWSkKMqY/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7Tx7yks9o4YAuhINJuhqWSkKMqY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/freelists-feeds/thin/~4/4ut0ye0ralw" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.freelists.org/post/thin/PVS-deployed-image-no-seamless-apps,9