<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for gastronomics</title>
	
	<link>http://www.gastronomicsblog.com</link>
	<description>the study and analysis of the production and consumption of good eats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/gastronomicscomments" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="gastronomicscomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on [Sous Vide] Pork Ribs by Karyl Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/2010/01/20/sous-vide-supreme-pork-ribs/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Karyl Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/?p=444#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Instead of torching, you can finish in a hot smoker (300 degrees) for about 30 minutes without losing the moistness.  It gives the smokey flavor you're missing.  You can then torch if you haven't gleaned the color you're looking for (mine colored up just fine).  I used this method when I realized I wouldn't be home to mind the smoker for a weekend barbeque.  I made the ribs (and briskit) early and finished both on the smoker.  No one was the wiser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of torching, you can finish in a hot smoker (300 degrees) for about 30 minutes without losing the moistness.  It gives the smokey flavor you&#8217;re missing.  You can then torch if you haven&#8217;t gleaned the color you&#8217;re looking for (mine colored up just fine).  I used this method when I realized I wouldn&#8217;t be home to mind the smoker for a weekend barbeque.  I made the ribs (and briskit) early and finished both on the smoker.  No one was the wiser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Sous Vide] Pork Ribs by bbum</title>
		<link>http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/2010/01/20/sous-vide-supreme-pork-ribs/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>bbum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 01:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/?p=444#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this -- going SV ribs for ~18 hours @ 160 inspired by this post.  Should be interesting.  Cooked down a Peach based BBQ sauce w/ketchup, mustard, maple syrup and siracha to baste with when searing on grill at end of cook.

BTW:  the post by "Les Kanealii" and "lg over the range microwave" are both spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this &#8212; going SV ribs for ~18 hours @ 160 inspired by this post.  Should be interesting.  Cooked down a Peach based BBQ sauce w/ketchup, mustard, maple syrup and siracha to baste with when searing on grill at end of cook.</p>
<p>BTW:  the post by &#8220;Les Kanealii&#8221; and &#8220;lg over the range microwave&#8221; are both spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Sous Vide] Poached Chicken (???) by sous vide</title>
		<link>http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/2010/01/20/sous-vide-supreme-poached-chicken/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>sous vide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/?p=407#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Cool can I copy this for my webpage ?
max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool can I copy this for my webpage ?<br />
max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Sous Vide] Short Ribs by sous vide</title>
		<link>http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/2010/02/05/sous-vide-short-ribs/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>sous vide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/?p=508#comment-140</guid>
		<description>very good Idea !!
Looks very good.
Max</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good Idea !!<br />
Looks very good.<br />
Max</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nanxiang Mantou Dian (Shanghai, China) by Melody Fury // GourmetFury.com</title>
		<link>http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/2008/02/06/nanxiang-mantou-dian-shanghai-china/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Melody Fury // GourmetFury.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 04:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petetam.com/gastronomics/?p=233#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Honey... you are so adorable. You and your XLB obsession. I know we'll perfect the craft together xo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honey&#8230; you are so adorable. You and your XLB obsession. I know we&#8217;ll perfect the craft together xo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Sous Vide] Poached Chicken (???) by lj</title>
		<link>http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/2010/01/20/sous-vide-supreme-poached-chicken/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>lj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 06:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/?p=407#comment-138</guid>
		<description>hmm... I thought you were going to make a sous vide take on a real chinese style poached chicken. Where it would be interesting to know what happens to the gelatineous texture of a simply poached and ice shocked technique that makes this traditional dish great. While your test on the chicken is a good read', reference to the chinese poached chicken is irrelevant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm&#8230; I thought you were going to make a sous vide take on a real chinese style poached chicken. Where it would be interesting to know what happens to the gelatineous texture of a simply poached and ice shocked technique that makes this traditional dish great. While your test on the chicken is a good read&#8217;, reference to the chinese poached chicken is irrelevant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Sous Vide] Pork Ribs by andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/2010/01/20/sous-vide-supreme-pork-ribs/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/?p=444#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Great post. To get that smoke flavor, I mix some liquid smoke (available from american food importers) with the marinade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. To get that smoke flavor, I mix some liquid smoke (available from american food importers) with the marinade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Sous Vide] Eggs by Janis</title>
		<link>http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/2010/01/12/sous-vide-supreme-eggs/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 06:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/?p=324#comment-135</guid>
		<description>It looks very similar to a Japanese Onsen egg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks very similar to a Japanese Onsen egg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Sous Vide] Ribeye by Zoey</title>
		<link>http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/2010/01/14/sous-vide-supreme-ribeye/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/?p=389#comment-134</guid>
		<description>First of all, I have used vacuum sealers, notably FoodSaver, and I am familiar with sous vide methods (which require a good vacuum and seal that stays sealed).

I received the SousVide Supreme Vacuum Sealer with the Demi Water Bath. Well, first of all, it does not seal well. The controls are only "seal only" and "vacuum seal" (and of course, a "cancel").

The instructions state that you shouldn't use liquids, however, in sealing ANY meat there is some liquid and even this tiny bit of liquid completely prevents a vacuum and seal. So you would need, one supposes, only to use frozen meat. The FoodSaver on the other hand, has a separate vacuum control that allows you to vacuum only to the degree that you want, and then you can select a "seal" separately from "vacuum" -- this allows one to totally control the degree of vacuum which is highly desirable.

I have seen that FoodSaver bags are safe for sous-vide (and you use one here) and then again, not. My next test will be finding and using safe bags that are not FoodSaver and hope the vacuum/seal works well. Your thoughts on this topic would be well received by us novice sous-viders.

In the meantime, I'm sending the Unsupreme vacuum/sealer back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I have used vacuum sealers, notably FoodSaver, and I am familiar with sous vide methods (which require a good vacuum and seal that stays sealed).</p>
<p>I received the SousVide Supreme Vacuum Sealer with the Demi Water Bath. Well, first of all, it does not seal well. The controls are only &#8220;seal only&#8221; and &#8220;vacuum seal&#8221; (and of course, a &#8220;cancel&#8221;).</p>
<p>The instructions state that you shouldn&#8217;t use liquids, however, in sealing ANY meat there is some liquid and even this tiny bit of liquid completely prevents a vacuum and seal. So you would need, one supposes, only to use frozen meat. The FoodSaver on the other hand, has a separate vacuum control that allows you to vacuum only to the degree that you want, and then you can select a &#8220;seal&#8221; separately from &#8220;vacuum&#8221; &#8212; this allows one to totally control the degree of vacuum which is highly desirable.</p>
<p>I have seen that FoodSaver bags are safe for sous-vide (and you use one here) and then again, not. My next test will be finding and using safe bags that are not FoodSaver and hope the vacuum/seal works well. Your thoughts on this topic would be well received by us novice sous-viders.</p>
<p>In the meantime, I&#8217;m sending the Unsupreme vacuum/sealer back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alinea – Meal of my Life… by Pete and Mel » When a Longhorn meets a Canuck</title>
		<link>http://www.gastronomicsblog.com/2009/07/09/alinea-meal-of-my-life/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete and Mel » When a Longhorn meets a Canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 15:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petetam.com/gastronomics/?p=139#comment-133</guid>
		<description>[...] your chaps on. I’ll admit, I first found Pete’s blog while I was searching for information on Alinea. I don’t actually remember what I tweeted him but soon after, he began to respond to pretty much [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your chaps on. I’ll admit, I first found Pete’s blog while I was searching for information on Alinea. I don’t actually remember what I tweeted him but soon after, he began to respond to pretty much [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss><!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->

