<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Geek Rant dot org</title>
	
	<link>http://www.geekrant.org</link>
	<description />
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 09:06:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/geekrant" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="geekrant" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Time bloat!</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/05/28/time-bloat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/05/28/time-bloat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 09:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dot Net]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=2176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a cool introduction to ASP.NET MVC, but I think it&#8217;s pretty funny that the &#8220;5 minute introduction&#8221; goes for 8 minutes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.asp.net/mvc/videos/mvc-2/how-do-i/5-minute-introduction-to-aspnet-mvc">This is a cool introduction to ASP.NET MVC</a>, but I think it&#8217;s pretty funny that the &#8220;5 minute introduction&#8221; goes for 8 minutes. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/danielbowen/7284568560/" title="Time bloat: 5 mins takes 8 mins by Daniel Bowen, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7223/7284568560_9a46f108da_z.jpg" width="640" height="269" alt="Time bloat: 5 mins takes 8 mins"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/05/28/time-bloat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My PCs</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/05/24/my-pcs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/05/24/my-pcs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 08:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=2167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have two desktop PCs at home; a no-name and an HP. One of the big benefits of the HP is that the specs are all online, which has made checking hardware and preparing for upgrades easier. This and the slightly better build/design is probably enough to have me looking at name-brand PCs next time. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have two desktop PCs at home; a no-name and an HP.</p>
<p>One of the big benefits of the HP is that the specs are all online, which has made checking hardware and preparing for upgrades easier. This and the slightly better build/design is probably enough to have me looking at name-brand PCs next time.</p>
<p>The specs for the no-name one <em>were</em> online (as part of the product sales information), but have recently disappeared, so &#8212; more for my own purposes than anything else &#8212; I&#8217;m copy/pasting them both here, with corrections for previous upgrades.</p>
<p>Yes, I realise they&#8217;re both long in the tooth. I&#8217;m on a budget here. No doubt this will all look pretty funny in 5-10 years when looking back.</p>
<h3>Tintin</h3>
<p>We use this as the workhouse computer, office stuff, that kind of thing.</p>
<p><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20080809125157/http://www.zazz.com.au/pastproducts.php?past=530">Bought off Zazz</a> in 2007.</p>
<p>Case: <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20080809125157/http://www.xsonic.net/%5Ccase_7022.html">X-Sonic 7022 ATX</a></p>
<p>Processor: <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20080906222405/http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_9485_9487%5E9503,00.html">Athlon</a> <del>64 3500 (2.2Ghz)</del> 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+, 2.3 Ghz</p>
<p>Motherboard: <a href="http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=2507#ov">Gigabyte GA-M61SME-S2</a> with onboard graphics (GeForce 6100), PCI-E, 6xUSB2.0 (two at front, four at rear), LAN, Audio etc.</p>
<p>Hard Drive: <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070603025515/http://www.samsung.com/Products/HardDiskDrive/SpinpointSSeries/HardDiskDrive_SpinpointSSeries_HD250HJ.asp">Samsung HD250HJ 250GB SATA</a> with 8Mb Buffer</p>
<p>Optical Drive: Samsung WriteMaster 18x Dual Layer DVD+-RW Burner</p>
<p>RAM: <del>Transcend 1GB DDR2 533Mhz</del> 3Gb</p>
<p>(Previous posts on this PC: <a href="http://www.geekrant.org/2007/07/05/modm-nas-apc-and-other-acronyms/">When I bought it</a>; <a href="http://www.geekrant.org/2010/05/19/advice-please-cpus/">shopping for a CPU upgrade</a>; <a href="http://www.danielbowen.com/2010/09/07/computer-brain-surgery/">installing the CPU</a>)</p>
<h3>Haddock</h3>
<p>This one is a tad faster, and is used for video capture and editing, as well as everyday stuff.</p>
<p><a href="http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?cc=au&#038;dlc=en&#038;docname=c01625614&#038;lc=en&#038;product=3830460">HP Pavilion a6760a</a></p>
<p>Case: Mid-size ATX (one of those standard circa 2009 HP jobs)</p>
<p>Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 (2.8 Ghz) &#8212; I really like that the HP web site includes upgrade information for this.</p>
<p>Motherboard: MCP73M01H1 (Napa)</p>
<p>RAM: DDR2 <del>2Gb (2x 1Gb) PC2-6400</del> 4Gb (2x 2Gb) PC2-6400 &#8212; I notice that Windows 7 32-bit can only currently see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3_GB_barrier">about 3.3 Gb of this</a>, so I&#8217;m thinking a switch to 64-bit Windows may be in order, if I can determine that all of the hardware supports it.</p>
<p>Video: NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS</p>
<p>Audio: Integrated Realtek ALC888S Audio</p>
<p>TV-tuner: AVerMedia DVB-T/PAL &#8212; of all the TV tuner cards I&#8217;ve had over the years, this has been the smoothest running.</p>
<p>Hard drive: 500 Gb, SATA, 7200 RPM. I&#8217;ve just plugged an additional Western Digital Blue Caviar 1Tb drive (also SATA, 7200 RPM) in to add to the capacity.</p>
<p>Optical drive: DVD+/-R/RW 16X 12X +/-DL LS 12X RAM SuperMulti SATA drive</p>
<p>Power: 300W power supply</p>
<p>(Previous <a href="http://www.danielbowen.com/2010/03/10/the-new-computer/">post from when I bought it</a>.)</p>
<p>PS. A bloke at work upgraded his PC to <em>32 Gb</em> of RAM. Makes me feel quite inadequate. Damn <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dinks.asp">DINKs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/05/24/my-pcs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revisiting Wolfenstein</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/05/11/revisiting-wolfenstein/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/05/11/revisiting-wolfenstein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 02:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=2163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wolfenstein 3D is 20 years old. To celebrate it&#8217;s been re-released as a browser game. And as Crikey notes, a 1992 Sydney Morning Herald reviewer was &#8220;flabbergasted&#8221; with the game: The game, we are warned, is rated PC-13 – Profound Carnage. Good advice. There’s plenty of blood and guts, and the sound effects are blood-curdling, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfenstein_3D">Wolfenstein 3D</a> is 20 years old. To celebrate it&#8217;s been re-released as <a href="http://wolfenstein.bethsoft.com/game_EU.php">a browser game</a>.</p>
<p>And as <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/game-on/2012/05/10/this-game-is-twenty-years-old/">Crikey notes</a>, a 1992 Sydney Morning Herald reviewer was &#8220;flabbergasted&#8221; with the game: <em>The game, we are warned, is rated PC-13 – Profound Carnage. Good advice. There’s plenty of blood and guts, and the sound effects are blood-curdling, so my sub-13-year-olds won’t be playing.</em></p>
<p>I remember playing it at my mate Brian&#8217;s place back when it was first released &#8212; the ancient computer I had at home couldn&#8217;t cope with it.</p>
<p>I had a go of it again last night. Sure enough, it worked well in the web browser. After about half-an-hour of shooting Nazis (and Nazi dogs) I felt a bit queasy. I think it was due to focussing on the low-res 3D, rather than the blood and guts.</p>
<p><em>(Hey, has anybody done a Downfall parody tie-in?)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/05/11/revisiting-wolfenstein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese character weirdness in Windows 7</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/04/26/chinese-chars-win7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/04/26/chinese-chars-win7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=2160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It used to be I could view Chinese characters in Notepad, Notepad++, Wordpad, that kind of thing. It stopped working at some stage: all I got was little squares. Wierdness. No amount of fiddling with encoding settings (particularly in Notepad++, which is replete with them) seemed to fix it. Looking around the Control Panel&#8217;s language [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It used to be I could view Chinese characters in Notepad, Notepad++, Wordpad, that kind of thing. It stopped working at some stage: all I got was little squares. Wierdness.</p>
<p>No amount of fiddling with encoding settings (particularly in Notepad++, which is replete with them) seemed to fix it.</p>
<p>Looking around the Control Panel&#8217;s language settings didn&#8217;t help either. You can install <a href="http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/downloads/install-languages-with-windows-update">extra Language Packs</a>, but the Chinese one is for Windows Enterprise and Ultimate only. I knew this couldn&#8217;t be the answer because previously it had been working, but I was only on Windows Professional.</p>
<p>Following a <a href="http://www.computing.net/answers/windows-7/my-chinese-word-suddenly-appear-as-square-box/698.html">tipoff</a> I found via Google, from someone having similar problems, I tried this: create a new local logon; log on as it; log off again; go and try again.</p>
<p>Sure enough, that worked. Why? Well that&#8217;s anybody&#8217;s guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/04/26/chinese-chars-win7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prince of Persia 6502 source code released</title>
		<link>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/04/19/prince-of-persia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/04/19/prince-of-persia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 11:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekrant.org/?p=2158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is pretty cool: the 6502 source code to the original Apple II version of Prince Of Persia has been released. The article also includes the story of how it was lost, found and recovered.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pretty cool: <a href="http://jordanmechner.com/blog/2012/04/source/">the 6502 source code to the original Apple II version of Prince Of Persia has been released</a>.</p>
<p>The article also includes the story of how it was lost, found and recovered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekrant.org/2012/04/19/prince-of-persia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

