<!-- START: rss.mtml -->
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <rss version="2.0">
        <channel>
			<ttl>180</ttl>
			<skipDays><day>Saturday</day><day>Sunday</day></skipDays>
            <title>GE Healthcare Partners - Ideas and Inspiration Around Key Healthcare Challenges</title>
            <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/</link>
            <description>Ideas and Inspiration Around Key Healthcare Challenges</description>
            <language>en-us</language>
            <copyright>Copyright 2018</copyright>
            <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 06:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
            <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    
            <item>
                <title>Why a physician&apos;s role is so crucial when implementing Lean methodology</title>
                <description><![CDATA[ <p>A frequent comment I hear from healthcare organizations who are struggling with Lean implementation is "if only we could get the physicians involved, we could really spread this Lean thinking."  And you know, they're right!  No one is admitted unless a physician signs for it.  No test is done unless a physician orders it.  No care is initiated unless a physician directs it.  No one is discharged unless a physician writes discharge orders.  You need to bring your physicians along early in your Lean strategy and you can do so by speaking their language.</p>
<p><strong>A powerful tool is to translate Lean into an analogy about delivering great patient care.</strong></p>
<p>You can compare the stages of evaluating and delivering great patient care to the stages in which Lean can be applied in healthcare processes.  The first stage in delivering great care is for the physician to go see the patient, similar to the Lean teaching to go see the process with our own eyes.  Secondly, physicians learn about a standard protocol in medical school called History, Physical, Impression, Plan (HPIP) as a systematic way to evaluate a patient.  Lean also systematizes process evaluation through the application of value stream mapping, 5S and Kaizen, all standard ways of uncovering potential solutions for treating serious process problems that consume wasted time and effort.  The third stage is the prescription for treatment; delivering great care involves not just treating the symptoms but addressing the root cause of the problem.  In Lean, we are taught not to jump to solutions, but to take the time to understand the facts around the process. Finally, in the fourth stage, physicians are taught to make sure there is follow up with the patient, whether it is with their primary care physician or other provider.  The Lean process is very focused on the follow up as learning new processes is highly challenging and a rigorous sustain plan with data is a key to successful implementations. </p>
<p><img alt="why-physicians-role-table.gif" src="http://nextlevel.gehealthcare.com/why-physicians-role-table.gif" width="564" height="158" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p>
<p>Try this analogy next time you are challenged to engage your physicians in participating in your Process Improvement initiatives. </p>]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/managing-change/why-a-physicians-role-is-so-crucial-when-implementing-lean-methodology.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/managing-change/why-a-physicians-role-is-so-crucial-when-implementing-lean-methodology.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Managing Change</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Be the change that you wish to see.... in your healthcare business meetings  Part 5 of 5</title>
                <description><![CDATA[ <p>Gandhi said that the best way to achieve positive change is to model the desired behaviors. This series of blogs discusses the 10 traits of effective meeting leadership, with the first eight behaviors discussed in <a href="/leadership-strategy/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-1-of-5.php">Part 1</a>, <a href="/leadership-strategy/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-2-of-5.php">Part 2</a>, <a href="/leadership-strategy/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-3-of-5.php">Part 3</a> and <a href="/leadership-strategy/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-4-of-5.php">Part 4</a>.  In this blog, we move on to the final two critical behaviors.</p> 
<p><b>9. Have an area of expertise / team up</b></p>
<p>Your health system meetings are a good opportunity to leverage your executive team as another set of audience members.  When you have the support of a larger group in business meetings, you should discuss and agree on critical areas of focus in advance to maximize participation. For example, you might want to focus on determining the financial solidity of the proposals and programs, analyzing how well the presenter assumed stretch targets, leveraging the right stakeholders, setting a shared vision, mobilizing commitment, considering change controls, or other important areas.  Once the audience members agree on these key aspects, it can be very helpful to determine who will question / interact in each area.  A meeting becomes one-dimensional and boring when only one executive speaks and, frankly, each of the audience members should be engaged in the conversation or what is the purpose of their attendance?  Determine the assignments ahead of time and help each other.  Each executive needn't stick to their original assignment, as long as the dialogue is lively, engaged and relevant.</p>
<p><b>10. Say thank you</b></p> 
<p>We can forget how stressful it is to prepare for a meeting with an executive.  Planning how you conclude these meetings is an important consideration.  I remember clearly a meeting I had with several vice presidents early in my career. I don't remember the topic we covered... in fact I could not recall what we talked about except that all of us presenters were challenged severely and were feeling a little deflated by the end of the meeting.  We had worked hard for weeks on our presentation and it was based on several months of difficult work. We all had our game faces on and soberly took our feedback with all of the professionalism we could muster. It was the end of the meeting and we started to gather our things to leave. At that point, surprising us, one of the vice presidents stopped us to say a few words.  He said some like this:  "Hey everyone, I know you might feel like we all poked you in the eye a little as we went through this presentation with you, but I want you to know that you all handled it really well, I recognize the monumental amount of work required to do this and I think the progress you have made is terrific.  It is our job to challenge you in these areas, and we do that to test you and also to learn about your work.  I feel great about all of the progress you have made, keep up the good work, and thank you for an outstanding presentation."  I walked out of that meeting sky high. I was so energized and could not wait to work even harder.  A simple 'thanks, great job" is NOT enough for your presenters.  You should try to 1) acknowledge their efforts and all of their hard work, 2) point out why you challenged them and why that is part of the process, and 3) say thank you.  This minimal effort, when done with true sincerity, can pay big dividends in employee engagement and productivity.</p>
<p>This was the final blog in the series covering another set of leadership behaviors to leverage in your meetings that can change your organization.  Performance Solutions' culture driven performance model can help your organization lead change in this and many other ways.</p>
<p>"Be the change that you wish to see in the world." -- Mahatma Gandhi</p>]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-5-of-5.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-5-of-5.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Leadership</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Be the change that you wish to see.... in your healthcare business meetings  Part 4 of 5</title>
                <description><![CDATA[ <p>How a leader conducts meetings not only plays a key role in the quality of the outcome, but it sets a performance model for the rest of the organization. This series of blogs discusses the 10 traits of effective meeting leadership, with the first six behaviors discussed in <a href="/leadership-strategy/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-1-of-5.php">Part 1</a>, <a href="/leadership-strategy/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-2-of-5.php">Part 2</a>, and <a href="/leadership-strategy/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-3-of-5.php">Part 3</a>.  In this blog, we move on to the next two critical behaviors.</p>
<p><strong>7. Stay out of the weeds</strong></p>
<p>There is a time for drilling down and getting into the details, and there is also a time for staying on track.  It's always appropriate to ask relevant questions about performance data and targets, whether financial, clinical or otherwise.  These data provide informative metrics and information that are critical for understanding the business of your healthcare system.  But don't get tricked into going down the rabbit hole by continuing to dwell on data to the point where you lose sight of the important strategic conversations that are a productive use of your time.  Use meetings to have strategic conversations and drill down only when necessary -- and get back on track quickly.  The behavior that you will inspire in your team is to know their numbers and be able to emerge from the details in order to consider strategic implications across the system.</p>
<p><strong>8. Drive accountability</strong></p>
<p>It is critical that your hospital leadership understands what they own in terms of results.  They have accountability for operational outcomes even when they may not have authority.  They should understand the broader influence responsibility that they have.  This is true for facility and department / corporate leaders.  In some organizations, it is the corporate and headquarters departments that can have a more difficult time acknowledging this reality.  Make it clear to them.  These leaders need to feel accountability for these results, regardless of their sense of control ... this is part of leadership expectation in their role and it bears re-iterating in your meetings with them. Requiring that each meeting include a recorded set of follow-up action items is a fantastic way to drive accountability, and the action list is only as good as the leader's ability and perseverance in following up.  Before anyone leaves the room, each action identified in the meeting needs a definition, an owner (who is responsible), and a due date.  These action items must be identified during the meeting, be sent to participants within a short time, and be accompanied by clear expectation regarding the follow up.  The quicker that actions are shared with accountable parties, the greater the impact on the recipients.  It is possible that you will eventually want to re-emphasize this accountability outside your meetings as well, and that can take the form of human capital practices like incentives, pay practices, merit and discipline programs. If you are going to set goals for your staff, your meetings with them, conversations, policies and practices need to reflect that they are accountable for those goals.</p>
<p>Look for the next blog covering another set of leadership behaviors that can change your organization.  Performance Solutions' culture driven performance model can help your organization lead change in this and many other ways.</p>]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-4-of-5.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-4-of-5.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Leadership</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Making a re-organization work for your health system</title>
                <description><![CDATA[ <p>IBM was in trouble.  Between 1990 and 1993 it had gone from one of the most profitable companies in the world to a company with mounting losses and legitimate questions about its continued viability.  With pressure on the company mounting, the board generally accepted CEO John Aker's strategy for right sizing IBM's performance, but they chose a new man to execute it: Louis Gerstner.   Many assumed Gerstner, an IBM outsider, would follow his predecessor's strategy of splitting the company into separate smaller entities, but after extensive customer sessions, Gerstner determined that in the rapidly changing technology environment of the early 1990's the future for IBM hinged on his ability to create, not a series of independent businesses, but a more unified company focused on providing coordinated customer solutions.</p>
<p>In order to move the company toward this goal, Gerstner began reorganizing IBM's management structure so the company was better positioned to drive customer solutions.  Gerstner breathed life into the revised structure by creating a series of systems and structures designed to change the way the business operated and ensure the company did not go through the re-organization only to revert to business as usual.  Gerstner knew that for IBM's transformation to succeed it had to extend beyond reporting lines and truly change the way people thought about their jobs.</p>
<p>The problem IBM faced in the 1990s is not all that dissimilar to the situation facing many healthcare executives today: in the face of a rapidly changing industry, health systems across the country are focused on moving from a siloed fee-for-service care model to a new world where all the assets of a system (Preventative, Acute, and Post-Acute) need to be focused on providing a patient with coordinated health solutions.  In response to this challenge, many health systems are reorganizing their leadership team and reporting structures, as IBM did, to better align with this new model of care. </p> 
<p>This is the right approach as traditional health system organization structures often create barriers to managing a population's health.  The re-organization alone does not solve the problem, however, and unfortunately, too many systems fail to take the next step of changing their operating systems and structures to support the new organization. Organization charts are important, but if you move the boxes without addressing how people actually work together and how goals are aligned across the organization you will continue producing the same results.</p>
<p>To activate its new strategy, IBM instituted new operating rhythms that brought together collaborative teams from across the organization to focus on progress toward its strategic imperatives. IBM also adjusted its goal-setting and incentive compensation systems to ensure leadership was aligned around the common goals of the organization.  This approach is similar to what GE uses internally, and it is the basic methodology Performance Solutions has used to drive transformations at health systems around the country.</p>
<p>Our experience has shown that health systems seeking a true transformation must move beyond simply re-organizing their reporting lines and focus on establishing organization-wide processes that align goals, focus work efforts around a few key initiatives, and ensure accountability for execution.  While re-organizations often accompany the transformation efforts we are involved in, the clients who are truly successful are those, like IBM, who adopt strong processes for aligning goals, activating strategy, and driving accountability.</p>
]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/managing-change/making-a-re-organization-work-for-your-health-system.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/managing-change/making-a-re-organization-work-for-your-health-system.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Managing Change</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Be the change that you wish to see.... in your healthcare business meetings  Part 3 of 5</title>
                <description><![CDATA[ <p>This series of blogs discusses the tremendous opportunity -- and responsibility -- that leaders have to drive positive change through their behavior at meetings.  You can access <a href="/leadership-strategy/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-1-of-5.php">Part 1</a> and <a href="/leadership-strategy/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-2-of-5.php">Part 2</a> to learn the first four traits of effective meeting leadership.  In this blog, we move on to the next two critical behaviors.</p>  
<p><strong>5. Listen</strong></p>
<p>It's amazing to me how many people think they are good listeners.  Consider the number of people who feel that they rarely experience a good listener, and we can reasonably conclude that there are some folks out there who think they are better at it than they really are.  I say this merely to bring attention to the concepts that underlie good listening, and to inspire some self-reflection on your current skills.  The two most commonly required changes in leadership behavior are 1) slow down and 2) show you understand.  It is human nature to try to determine what someone is going to say before they finish their sentence.  However, when you complete a sentence for a speaker, it can be drastically de-energizing as a listening technique, even though the speaker may feel you are demonstrating keen insight.  Waiting patiently to make your point is another behavior that takes attention away from what the speaker is saying.  If you are finishing sentences for others, thinking of a point that you will add, or generally jumping in to make your own point, you may need to think seriously about slowing down the conversation.  Taking the time to use your toolbox of active listening techniques will pay large dividends in the form of productive conversations and overall goodwill (the term 'go slow to go fast' applies here). Showing real understanding in your remarks and having the speaker acknowledge that you are mirroring their content accurately will lead to a much richer and more robust dialogue and idea sharing. As a leader, demonstrating outstanding listening skills allows you to model behavior that you would like to see more broadly in the organization, and it can also make you seem much more approachable, which may expose you to more innovation and creativity in lower ranks.</p><p>
</p><p><strong>6. Determine how well your presenter knows the material</strong></p>
<p>Sometimes, you should ask a few questions that you already know the answer to.  Each meeting you have with anyone in your system is an opportunity to get additional data and collect feedback.  All interactions are performance reviews, so try to get the most out of each one. Don't be shy about pushing for more information and don't accept "I don't know" or "I'll need to get back to you" without an explanation, especially if it is in an area of expertise that you expect that individual to have mastered.  Think of the power in knowing something more about how your staff is performing and finding out in a way that allows you to assess true operational knowledge.  Don't we all want our leaders and staff to know the business of healthcare extremely well?  Have they thought through applications, impacts, consequences, benchmarks, organizational considerations, and workforce planning, to name a few considerations?  Are they relying so heavily on consultants that they don't understand their own business as well as they should?  Your meetings are a great way to pulse and prod in this area... take the opportunity to make every interaction a source of input for your staff's performance reviews.</p>
<p>Look for the next blog covering another set of leadership behaviors that can change your organization.  Performance Solutions' culture driven performance model can help your organization lead change in this and many other ways.</p>]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-3-of-5.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-3-of-5.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Leadership</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:36:08 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Be the change that you wish to see.... in your healthcare business meetings  Part 2 of 5</title>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The second in a series, this blog continues our discussion of the 10 traits of leadership behaviors in meetings that can change your organization. In <a href="/leadership-strategy/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-1-of-5.php">the first blog</a>, we discussed the importance of establishing an interactive format and how to be firm but fair. In this blog, we move on to the next two critical leadership behaviors.</p>
<p><strong>3. Demonstrate you support the right analysis and back-up</strong></p>
<p>As a healthcare leader, you direct your staff in many areas. For example, you may ask physician leaders to initiate a project to implement a care model, starting with orthopedics across your system. Or create a new patient experience model and pilot it at your hospital in the southwest region. When your presenter comes to share plans and strategies for leading, executing, and sustaining this initiative, you have a unique and special opportunity as a leader. All plans or recommendations to be reviewed need to be based on tangible and logical data. Environmental analysis, benchmarking, well-informed assumptions, focus group results, and financial forecasts are examples of what you as a leader should require. It is irrelevant whether you provided the direction to go forward or not; no one's gut feel - neither yours nor your team's - is sufficient to merit acting upon. It may take several meetings of pushing on the team to supply this missing data, but don't give up. After a few of these experiences, organizational behavior will begin to change and a culture shift towards analytical verification should emerge.</p>
<p><strong>4. Acknowledge work well done</strong></p>
<p>While it might seem trite to say "nice job" (or a similar verbal pat on the back) any time the right work is presented, it is actually a fundamental way to help your leaders and teams understand your standards. They need to know specifically the type of work, innovation, communication and vision that you want to see and understand how it will help them work through difficult patches. The acknowledgement needs to be delivered with three unique parts: 1) indicate why it is important, 2) reflect on the impact it makes, and 3) convey how the demonstrated behaviors can be leveraged to move through other difficult areas and that you would like to see more of this level of performance. Word spreads quickly on the kind of work and behavior you are looking for... and breeds more! I strongly encourage leaders to practice this particular behavior before trying it in a meeting. It is harder than it looks to employ, probably because it seems too simple and straightforward. Don't underestimate the impact on the recipient during a meeting when this type of feedback is delivered effectively and sincerely. At that moment, many leaders see the inspiration and motivation they have been eager to drive in their organizations start to take root.</p>
<p>Look for the next blog covering another set of leadership behaviors that can change your organization. Performance Solutions' culture driven performance model can help your organization lead change in this and many other ways.</p>]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-2-of-5.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-2-of-5.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Leadership</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Be the change that you wish to see.... in your healthcare business meetings Part 1 of 5</title>
                <description><![CDATA[ <p>Many of us are familiar with Mahatma Gandhi's inspiring words - "Be the change that you wish to see in the world."   With so many regulatory and competitive pressures upon us in healthcare, some may ask how?  How do we model and inspire change?  As leaders in our healthcare systems, we have a unique and special responsibility in this area.</p>
<p>Getting comfortable with change is a first step.  Knowing that change is a constant state of being, and leading successfully in that space, requires the ability to optimize operations while embracing the delicate balance required in managing your human capital.  How many times have we had an idea for motivating our workforce (or for motivating just one member of our staff) that we planned and thought about for days? We worked on the right words, meaningful examples we would reference, our tone, and even facial expressions.  But somehow, our message lost power along the way.  It wasn't as impactful as we wanted it to be, and our teams (and maybe we ourselves) reverted to prior behaviors.</p>
<p>As Gandhi points out, our messages gain in power when they take the form of the actual behavior we model, starting with how we act as leaders in our meetings.  In this series of five blogs, we'll cover 10 leadership behaviors that can inspire and maintain true change in your organization. It's this type of executive coaching that Performance Solutions can offer your organization as you address some of the human side of leading change.   Everyone looks to leaders in order to guide their own behavior. Your responsibility is undeniable... how you shoulder it is up to you.</p>
<p><strong>1. Start interacting right out of the gate</strong></p>
<p>We've all been in meetings when the presenter, eyes down, starts to methodically walk through the bulleted items on a presentation slide or read lines of data analysis one-by-one. It can be hard to get a word in without rudely interrupting, and by the time there is an opportunity to talk, it can seem insulting and hurtful to state that they need to re-think their approach. Statements from a leader in the room, even a few minutes into a presentation, such as "we want to make this a discussion," or "let's start with some grounding on your topic," or "I'd prefer to hear some of your impressions of this analysis" can seem like a harsh judgment to the presenter.  Add that to the nervousness that many presenters feel, and we've lost an opportunity to create a more positive experience for the group.</p>  
<p>The key is to start the interaction very early in the process.  Early intervention can prevent a 'speech' and encourage discussion. The responsibility for setting a tone for the interaction falls on the leader.  The moment eyes drop down to a page, call attention back up by asking a pertinent question.  I've even seen an executive in an audience say "I can read, so you don't need to read your slides to me.  Please look up and let me know what you think." Getting a two-way dialogue started in the first 30 seconds is the key to a meeting with a different tone.  Late intervention can feel like a slap, whereas early involvement feels like an expectation-setting exercise and is less confrontational. Once presenters begin to get a feel for this new style, they will begin to change their approach as they enter business meetings, and a cultural shift should ensue.</p>
<p><strong>2. Be firm, but fair</strong></p>
<p>Setting an environment where serious work with serious results is encouraged and recognized is harder than it looks.  Being able to recognize work that was challenging yet worth it requires having a deep knowledge of the subject.  People like to be complimented.  And it feels good to be the one doling out the kudos.  For some leaders it comes naturally while others need to be reminded to focus on the positives. The magic is in the balance. I think the key here is preparation via multiple means.  Whether it means having a few short discussions with internal or external colleagues, reading up or walking the hospitals, the more you know the better you can challenge and praise in the meaningful areas of work.  How you respond to the work being presented will drive all future behavior in interactions.  Taking this work and this presentation seriously is a major step. Providing firm and fair perspective encourages MORE meaningful work, which can push your organization forward at the speed of leadership's drive.</p>
<p>Look for the next blog covering another set of leadership behaviors that can change your organization.  Performance Solutions' culture driven performance model can help your organization lead change in this and many other ways.</p>]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-1-of-5.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/be-the-change-that-you-wish-to-see-in-your-healthcare-business-meetings-part-1-of-5.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Leadership</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Mergers and Marriages: Six Tips to Help Healthcare Organizations Live Happily Ever After</title>
                <description><![CDATA[ <p>A recent study<sup>1</sup> from Booz Allen found that only 41% of acquired hospitals outperformed their peer group. In the U.S., approximately 50% of marriages end in divorce. Since Mergers and Acquisitions are often thought of as a "marriage" of two organizations, I was compelled by these two similar statistics to explore the "glass is half full" scenario to see what can be learned.</p>
<p>As many private practices and hospitals are being purchased by large health systems, and many large health systems are merging with each other or payers, here are a few tips from happily married couples to consider.</p>

<ol>
	<li><b>Understand how you balance each other out</b> - Phrases like "opposites attract" and "you complete me" are woven into our culture. There are compelling reasons why. The same sentiment is a primary driver of healthcare M&amp;A activity: to close gaps in the continuum of care for patients, while also preparing to manage risk as organizations move to new structures such as Accountable Care Organizations. <b>Lesson:</b><i> Ensure each organization clearly understands the other's value proposition and why at the end of the day, 1+1 should equal 3.</i></li>
	<li><b>Meet the extended family</b> - When you marry someone, you are also marrying their family. Strange Uncle Earl and loud Aunt Deb come with the deal, whether you like it or not. <b>Lesson:</b> <i>Many hospitals and physician practices have well established ecosystems. Seek to understand your new family and its connections before it's too late.</i></li>
	<li><b>Set goals or make a bucket list</b> - Happily married couples often work together to set goals for one year, five years or beyond. They draft the list collaboratively and work together to achieve it. <b>Lesson:</b> <i>Healthcare organizations should work together on creating goals and ensure there are regular mechanisms to review progress and course correct as needed.</i></li>
	<li><b>Shared values</b> - Along with a common set of goals, having shared values is imperative. That said, there is plenty of room for different interests, beliefs and opinions. Even if you do not agree with your partner at all times, you should respect them. <b>Lesson:</b> <i>With more collaboration between for-profits and not-for-profits, faith-based and non-faith based organizations, medical schools and university hospitals, providers and payers, it is critical to define a path for shared values and behaviors in order to operate as a single entity.</i></li>
	<li><b>Understand each other's practices and habits</b> - Before you "propose," you better understand how your significant other lives. For example, do you both cook and clean the same way? Probably not and stating "my way is the right way to do it" is usually not a smart move.  However, if you can show why an approach is better, it often helps. Consolidating healthcare organizations face a similar challenge. Adding a "brand name" sign on the front door or stating "do it this way, because it's evidence based practice," does not magically change the way care is delivered.<b> Lesson:</b> <i>Understanding how each organization operates and working together to arrive at a consistent experience is critical to success. If you approach contentious issues with an open mind and avoid a "not-invented-here" mentality, everyone will come out better for it.</i></li>
	<li><b>Be willing to compromise</b> - While compatibility and balance are vital, a great marriage always involves compromise. This can range from the mundane (picking the restaurant) to the weighty (deciding what religion to raise your child). M&amp;A in healthcare will always include compromise as well.<b> Lesson:</b><i> The key to success is making decisions within the context of what is better for the organization as a whole - drawing on the foundation of your shared goals and values, ensuring transparency in the decision process, and clearly communicating the rationale.</i></li>
</ol>
<p>While we are not marriage counselors at GE Healthcare, our Performance Solutions team has worked with healthcare organizations for the past decade, successfully applying many of the principles described above. <a href="http://nextlevel.gehealthcare.com/leadership-strategy/operational-strategy/making-progress-amid-the-storm.php">Click here</a> to read one of those success stories.  And if you have gone through or are planning an M&amp;A activity, I invite you to join the dialogue and share your own experiences and tips for success.</p>
<p><b>Reference</b></p>
<ol>
	<li>
		Saxena, S.B., Sharma, A., Wong, A. (2013) "Succeeding in Hospital &amp; Health Systems M&amp;A Why So Many Deals Have Failed, and How to Succeed in the Future"  Leading Research paper, Booz &amp; Company. </li>
</ol>]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/mergers-and-marriages-six-tips-to-help-healthcare-organizations-live-happily-ever-after.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/mergers-and-marriages-six-tips-to-help-healthcare-organizations-live-happily-ever-after.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Leadership</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Are you ready to step out of the silo?</title>
                <description><![CDATA[ <p>How many of you feel your hospital operates in silos the way the Ford of 2006 operated?  The silo mentality is one of the most common concerns expressed by our clients about their senior leadership teams, and it is often cited as the reason why the organization cannot get traction on its strategic initiatives and transformation efforts.  Instead of working as one organization focused on common strategic imperatives, each operating unit is pulling in its own direction and following its own agenda. </p> 
<p>The ironic thing is, although most clients cite the silos as a concern, few if any have truly tried to bring their leadership together for constructive, collaborative dialogue about the organization.  While almost all clients have senior leadership meetings, few have the types of structured, focused, and honest conversations that Mulally pushed at Ford using his Business Plan Review meetings.  Like Ford, we know the success of hospital transformations hinge on the ability of senior leadership to have honest, collaborative dialogue with one another.  When we work with clients on activating strategy we create this dialogue through the Quarterly Operating Review (QOR) process.</p> 
<p>Quarterly Operating Reviews are template-driven meetings where each initiative team updates their colleagues on where they are relative to their targets and what they plan to do over the next ninety days to meet their goals.  As the primary operating mechanism for our strategy activation process, the QORs are designed to be mandatory checkpoints where leaders and teams are held accountable for their performance.  The meetings, however, are not simply report-outs, they are action-focused discussions in which leaders discuss their plans for achieving their goals while other members of the leadership team ask questions and offer assistance.  The QOR process creates a culture of shared responsibility for achieving the organization's goals -- leaders are expected to share where they are falling short of their targets and their peers are expected to have candid dialogue about where they can offer assistance or who can make up the shortfall through over-performance in their area.  The QORs help educate every leader in the organization on where they stand relative to their goals and they help foster candid conversations about organization priorities, interdepartmental conflicts, and staff talent.  </p> 
<p>This type of dialogue has helped GE succeed for over 100 years and is a major reason why the company is considered a world-class operating organization.  Despite the success of this approach, we often find this type of dialogue to be very unsettling for our clients because they operate in very siloed environments where successes and failures are treated as secrets to be shared only with immediate superiors; meaningful, strategic dialogue between peers on the senior leadership team is neither expected nor encouraged.  Even many successful clients view their organizations as a collection of individual units and goals where dialogue among the leadership team is a nice to have but only necessary in instances where the work of one unit directly affects the work of another unit.  Experience has shown, however, that in large, complex environments like Ford or GE or a hospital, candid dialogue across the entire leadership team is a key to unlocking the potential of the organization.</p> 
]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/blog/are-you-ready-to-step-out-of-the-silo.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/blog/are-you-ready-to-step-out-of-the-silo.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Strategy Development &amp; Activation</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Put Your Fears on the (Boardroom) Table</title>
                <description><![CDATA[
<p>When Alan Mulally became CEO of Ford in 2006, he was walking into a bad situation: the company was struggling to become profitable and facing declining consumer demand and a growing global recession.  Mulally knew that for Ford to survive it had to reduce cost and complexity by beginning to act as one global company with shared car platforms, suppliers, etc.  To make this happen, Mulally would need his currently siloed leadership team to drive collaboration across their various divisions and geographies, and he knew that for his leadership team to operate cohesively and run "One Ford" they first had to start communicating honestly and openly with one another about the business.  Although Ford had many meetings that could serve as a venue for this type of interaction, it simply wasn't happening so Mulally scrapped many of the existing meetings and operating mechanisms and instituted the Business Plan Review (BPR) meeting.</p>
<p>Every week Ford's entire senior leadership team would gather to report on their progress toward the company's turnaround plan. They used succinct, data-driven, template-guided reports intended to quickly educate everyone on the team about where the company was relative to its goals.  The meeting was mandatory and was designed to expedite progress on the turnaround plan, remove organizational barriers, drive cohesiveness in global operations, and ensure every member of the team was familiar with every aspect of the business.  Mulally expected all members of his team to be prepared for their presentations and he demanded that they share information, both good and bad, openly and honestly.  The culture of Ford had always been one that encouraged hiding failures or shortcomings for fear your peers would use the information against you, but Mulally's BPR meetings turned it into a culture where leaders freely shared shortcomings and failures because their peers were expected to offer assistance in correcting issues.  The BPRs became the central operating mechanism for Ford, and during the heart of the financial crisis they were held every day to ensure every member of the leadership team had a clear understanding of where the business was and what they needed to be doing to move the plan forward.  By creating a venue for honest dialogue among the leadership team, the BPR meetings helped changed the way Ford operated and helped it execute the turnaround plan that kept the company out of bankruptcy and away from government assistance.</p>
<p>Fostering candid dialogue among senior leaders, like Alan Mulally did at Ford, is a core principle of Performance Solutions Management Systems philosophy, and we view it as a critical component to any successful hospital transformation.  In the next blog we will discuss how we apply the principle of leadership dialogue while working with our hospital partners.</p>
<p><strong>Are you ready to step out of the silo?</strong></p>
<p>How many of you feel your hospital operates in silos the way the Ford of 2006 operated?  The silo mentality is one of the most common concerns expressed by our clients about their senior leadership teams, and it is often cited as the reason why the organization cannot get traction on its strategic initiatives and transformation efforts.  Instead of working as one organization focused on common strategic imperatives, each operating unit is pulling in its own direction and following its own agenda.</p>
<p>The ironic thing is, although most clients cite the silos as a concern, few if any have truly tried to bring their leadership together for constructive, collaborative dialogue about the organization.  While almost all clients have senior leadership meetings, few have the types of structured, focused, and honest conversations that Mulally pushed at Ford using his Business Plan Review meetings.  Like Ford, we know the success of hospital transformations hinge on the ability of senior leadership to have honest, collaborative dialogue with one another.  When we work with clients on activating strategy we create this dialogue through the Quarterly Operating Review (QOR) process.</p>
<p>Quarterly Operating Reviews are template-driven meetings where each initiative team updates their colleagues on where they are relative to their targets and what they plan to do over the next ninety days to meet their goals.  As the primary operating mechanism for our strategy activation process, the QORs are designed to be mandatory checkpoints where leaders and teams are held accountable for their performance.  The meetings, however, are not simply report-outs, they are action-focused discussions in which leaders discuss their plans for achieving their goals while other members of the leadership team ask questions and offer assistance.  The QOR process creates a culture of shared responsibility for achieving the organization's goals -- leaders are expected to share where they are falling short of their targets and their peers are expected to have candid dialogue about where they can offer assistance or who can make up the shortfall through over-performance in their area.  The QORs help educate every leader in the organization on where they stand relative to their goals and they help foster candid conversations about organization priorities, interdepartmental conflicts, and staff talent.</p>
<p>This type of dialogue has helped GE succeed for over 100 years and is a major reason why the company is considered a world-class operating organization.  Despite the success of this approach, we often find this type of dialogue to be very unsettling for our clients because they operate in very siloed environments where successes and failures are treated as secrets to be shared only with immediate superiors; meaningful, strategic dialogue between peers on the senior leadership team is neither expected nor encouraged.  Even many successful clients view their organizations as a collection of individual units and goals where dialogue among the leadership team is a nice to have but only necessary in instances where the work of one unit directly affects the work of another unit.  Experience has shown, however, that in large, complex environments like Ford or GE or a hospital, candid dialogue across the entire leadership team is a key to unlocking the potential of the organization.</p> ]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/strategy-development-activation/put-your-fears-on-the-boardroom-table.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/strategy-development-activation/put-your-fears-on-the-boardroom-table.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Strategy Development &amp; Activation</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Healthcare Leadership: Ask for the Ball</title>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>"Winners always want the ball when the game is on the line." This quote from the movie "The Replacements" has stuck with me even though the movie is otherwise forgettable.  I find the quote so apt in today's healthcare industry.  I believe the "game is on the line" right now when it comes to healthcare.  We know that current healthcare provider business models are not sustainable in the long run and so the "he game is on the line."</p><p>There is ample evidence that the demand side of healthcare has changed already and is expected to continue to shift.  Inpatient volume growth is near zero often with extreme unexplainable swings. Providers are caring for large numbers of observation patients, cases which are difficult to accommodate effectively within the operational structures of many hospitals.  Outpatient volumes are continuing to grow, but providers need to make vital decisions about how and where to best serve the growing numbers of outpatient consumers.    Crafting strategic responses to these challenges would be difficult enough, but most providers have also identified huge amounts of costs that need to be taken out of their organizations to meet the threats to the top line.  These costs targets are far in excess of what can be taken out of the organization by the usual means of curtailing discretionary spending and mass reductions in personnel.</p>

<p>So what responses are we seeing to these enormous challenges?  Too often we are seeing leaders waiting for more certainty in their markets and the regulatory environment before acting.  Further compounding the difficulty in forming an organizational response is the fact that these problems cut across many of the traditional operating structures of most hospitals.  Managers throughout the organization see the problems as outside of their span of authority and don't feel they have the requisite knowledge to take on these challenges. Accordingly, little action is being taken and time is running out. What can be done to break the impasse?</p>

<p>My premise is that managers throughout provider organizations need to step up as winners and "ask for the ball" This doesn't mean that the leader retires into his or her office and comes out weeks later with the solutions carved in tablets of stone.  Here's what I think this process of "stepping up" should look like: </p>

<ol>
	<li>Show that you can assemble a multi-disciplinary team of individuals from across your organization.  Select your teammates wisely and not simply from the senior leadership ranks.  You'll want fresh ideas and out of the box thinking.  If the organization is doing annual Leadership and Talent Reviews of managers and key personnel this should be an easy task of scanning through these reviews to identify who might be ready for a stretch assignment with your team. </li>
	<li>Prove that you can manage, inspire and foster a common vision of change across your team.  Paint the vision of the "burning platform" for change.   This is more than painting a dire picture of the future.  Painting the negatives without reassuring leaders than they can succeed is counterproductive.  Give the team the confidence that they are empowered to develop solutions to the daunting problems facing the organization. </li>
	<li>Challenge the team with specific targets to be met.  At GE we call this "start with the answer."  This concept changes the dialogue from what can we do incrementally, to what we need to do to meet the needed.  To use a football analogy, you don't want the team running plays that will produce a field goal when you're behind by a touchdown.  </li>
	<li>Be bold and work with your team to develop a firm view of the future of healthcare in your market.  Don't simply accept that the "expert" view of the market will come true and fully fit your local market dynamics.   With any of the assumptions that you make about the market trends don't forget to ask what it will mean if these key trends don't unroll as expected.  </li>
	<li>Help your team to suspend their "not invented here" tendencies and reach out to experts inside and outside the healthcare industry to collect and evaluate the best ideas for strategies that can be deployed in your organization.   Engage outside assistance as needed to help develop and deploy strategies to meet the challenges of high performance in cost, quality and access.  Assemble best of breed solutions to fit your view of the market and test the sensitivity of your solutions to varying market conditions and trends. </li>
</ol>

<p>While there's no denying that the challenges are huge, I believe that the major mistakes to be made are in waiting to begin this transition.  Start now, be a winner, "ask for the ball!"</p>
 ]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/healthcare-leadership-ask-for-the-ball.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/healthcare-leadership-ask-for-the-ball.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Leadership</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Hospital Goblins, the challenge to manage strategy and operational pressures.</title>
                <description><![CDATA[There is fairy tale lore that says that goblins exist in the in-betweens... the space between outside and inside - in doorways, windows, thresholds, etc.  These goblins distract, forcing you to lose focus, time and wasting energy.  
<br /><br />
As we begin  a new year, health care leaders all around are discussing leading in the space between planning for the future and setting strategy AND managing the day to day operations of running a health care organization ( replete with patient centricity initiatives and expectations, talent development, census, healthcare reform, and preparation for the Joint Commission, among other demanding events. )
<br /><br />
So how do you do it?  How do you dominate your own goblins and become innovative and strategic, maintain focus, and make progress while considering competitive forces and the daily rhythm (aka chaos) of managing a health care organization?  Simply saying you are going to make the time to focus on strategy may work for some, but it seems that is rarely enough to elevate the organization in this environment. Henry David Thoreau said "Go confidently in the direction of your dreams, live the life you've imagined".  The hard part is figuring out how to master that space between dream and reality... The goblin.
<br /><br />
Being innovative is frequently about seeing something in a different way, yet  operating in that space between strategic innovation and day to day operations eludes us.   A simple snapshot of a map looks completely different when shown as the diagram of streets vs. the diagram of the blocks, or the spaces in between the streets.  It turns out getting to an address in Japan requires a completely different approach, including knowing the block number and the number of the house (which is determined by when the building was constructed, NOT by its location) Much like an optical illusion, one must completely change his perspective in order to 'see' and use a map in this different way, which is an analogy for how the adult mind must shift perspectives completely in order to create innovative ideas that are truly out of the box. 
<br /><br />
So, if you really want to see your organization from a different angle, go to Japan. Well, not literally. Take your executive team away from the day-to-day operations and stimulate them with best practices from other industries. Inspire innovation with a different setting and a different dialogue. The place for innovative conversations is in an innovative , stimulating environment.
<br /><br />
To manage the day to day operating challenges, adopt an operating mechanism that demands progress towards both operational and strategic goals, and within that rhythm allow for the insertion and fostering of creative ideas and innovation action items from your trip to "Japan." Create an environment that not only allows the introduction of the unique perspective (the map that seems like an optical illusions because it is so foreign), but celebrates, rewards and demands innovative ideas.  But recognize if you have the same people, sitting in the sample place, in the same way you always do, it will do little to create the innovative break-through you've been looking for. 
]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/strategy-development-activation/hospital-goblins-the-challenge-to-manage-strategy-and-operational-pressures.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/strategy-development-activation/hospital-goblins-the-challenge-to-manage-strategy-and-operational-pressures.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Strategy Development &amp; Activation</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>A cautionary tale of hyper-competitive physician markets</title>
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The first blow to the hospital's performance came at the  beginning of 2011 as a competitor lured away a primary care practice that  generated significant inpatient and outpatient volume for the hospital.&nbsp; Given the loss of the practice, hospital  management (of the 250 bed community suburban hospital) wasn't surprised when  volumes began to decline in March.&nbsp; They  were already looking for additional volumes to cover the anticipated 1 to 2  percentage point loss in volume.&nbsp; When  the volume loss reached the 4-5% range it was clear to management that  something else was going on.&nbsp; Hospital  leadership checked the usual suspects looking for an answer.&nbsp; Had other major admitters shifted their  utilization?&nbsp; Had there been a major  change in ER utilization or ER admission rates?&nbsp;  None of these queries provided the reason for the steep decline in  volume.</p><p>
  For several weeks, the reason for the volume decline  remained a mystery and yet it persisted.&nbsp;  The answer, when it became apparent, was quite surprising.&nbsp; During the Spring of 2011 the hospital had  implemented a new clinical information system.&nbsp;  While the implementation was functionally successful it did require  changes in physician workflows and processes.&nbsp;  Physicians who had been splitting their referral volumes and sending the  minority of their cases to the hospital shifted their volumes to competitor  hospitals.&nbsp; After discovering the cause  of the volume decline, the hospital focused attention on making the workflows  as efficient as possible and hired extra staff to help physicians navigate the  system but volumes have not yet returned to normal.</p><p>
  This could never happen to your hospital, right?&nbsp; While the exact confluence of factors may not  be repeated at other hospitals we are seeing these market driven events across  the country.&nbsp; Hyper-competitive markets  for physician practices are causing disruption of traditional referral  patterns.&nbsp; Payers are putting pressure on  volumes via more stringent rules and increased audit activity.&nbsp; Patients have delayed elective procedures in  the face of difficult economic conditions.&nbsp;  Finally, business models in healthcare are changing, altering the  relationships between clinicians and delivery systems.&nbsp; Any or all of these factors can pop up  unexpectedly to cause significant changes in the financial performance of the  hospital.&nbsp; So how does a hospital protect  itself from these unexpected changes in volumes?</p>
<ul>
  <li>First, insure that your leadership has a clear  understanding of the historical volume trends for your organization, including  any seasonal trends, referral channels, and geographic distribution. Continue  to run your volume reporting and analytics on a regular basis to insure that  you can detect and respond to changes in volume very rapidly.&nbsp; Assemble a multi-disciplinary team to review  the volume reports on a regular basis.
  </li>
  <li>Second, perform a segmentation analysis on your  customer base to make sure that you have a clear understanding of the wants,  needs and socio-economic position of each of the customer segments.
  </li>
  <li>Third, a segmentation analysis should be performed  on your physician base.&nbsp; This analysis  will help you to understand the key wants and needs of each major specialty and  admitter group.</li>
  <li>Finally, the execution of major strategy  components should be accompanied by change management tools like a stakeholder  analysis, 3-D's Matrix or Resistance Analysis in order to insure that the  impact of any given change is handled smoothly. 
  </li>
</ul>
<p>The future success of any provider organization will require  that the entire organization be extraordinarily focused on customers and  customer service.&nbsp; The ability to detect  and react to markets shifts will become a key skill set for all providers.</p>]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/strategy-development-activation/a-cautionary-tale-of-hyper-competitive-physician-markets.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/strategy-development-activation/a-cautionary-tale-of-hyper-competitive-physician-markets.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Strategy Development &amp; Activation</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Innovate Much? </title>
                <description><![CDATA[Nearly all our clients seek to innovate and improve.  Some seek strategic transformation; others new tactics to get 1% better.  In all cases, innovation is a team sport that requires vision, focus and a commitment to learning.  To get started, teams often need a common framework from which to explore the topic of innovation and the nature of innovating.  With that in mind, here are my current favorite books on innovation:  
<br /><br /><br /><br />

<ol>
	<li><u>The Ten Faces of Innovation</u> by Tom Kelly describes different styles with which people innovate.  Along the way, he reminds us of the nature of innovation with passages like:  "most organizations have no shortage of problem solvers.  The challenge is that they don't know what problem to solve."  The "ten faces" in the title refers to ten different approaches to innovation and read almost as personality types.  For example, "the anthropologist", the "cross-pollinator" and the "caregiver."  
	<br /><br />
	This is usually the first book we recommend to healthcare leaders working to raise the innovation IQ of their hospital.  That's because TFOI reminds us that great innovation comes in different packages.  As leaders, we must be conscious to foster diversity within our teams.</li>
	<li><u>Defence of Duffer's Drift</u> by E.D. Swinton.  Heralded as the most popular book in the world for training military officers, DODD describes a young British officer and his unit's  mission during the Boer War to hold a piece of ground for a few days in order to prevent the Boers from flanking a British column.  The book is structured as a series of dreams in which the young officer attempts the same mission day after day. In each dream he loses the fight and wakes up the next day with the same challenge... with one exception:  he retains the lessons of each defeat and applies them the next day.  
	<br />The young officer begins, as most innovators do, with a series of well-intentioned mistakes.  For example, in the first dream he allows his soldiers to rest rather than prepare the defense.  When they are overrun that night he learns a basic lesson:  soldiers would rather be alive than rested.  From that first lesson, the unit improves every aspect of their defense and eventually wins.  This, of course, makes it a story of successful innovation. </li>
	
	<li><u>Beautiful Evidence</u> by Edward Tufte.  I am a big fan of Mr. Tufte.  He writes and speaks about the visual representation of quantitative information (aka "a picture speaks a thousand words").  For example, in this book Mr. Tufte highlights what he describes as "the greatest visualization of the 19th century", Charles Minard's 1869 "super- graphic" to illustrate Napoleon's failed invasion of Russia in 1812 and 1813.  </li>
	<br />
<img alt="innovate_much.png" src="http://nextlevel.gehealthcare.com/innovate_much.png" class="mt-image-none" style="" width="300" height="111" />
<br /><br />
	The purpose of the graphic was to communicate to a later generation the magnitude of loss of life in war.  How to do so thoroughly and quickly in order to win and keep the attention of his audience?  Minard accomplished this with two lines superimposed over a map:  a brown line to track the invasion and a black line for the subsequent retreat.  Here's the brilliant part:  the thickness of the lines represents the number of soldiers in the army at that point in the invasion.  As the lines brutally convey, Napoleon left France with an army of 422,000 and returned with only 10,000 soldiers.  With the shock that follows this realization, the reader is drawn into the map and begins to explore the rich information within.  That's what makes it a super graphic.  
	<br /><br />
	In Beautiful Evidence, Tufte shares example after example of this type of innovative genius in the presentation of ideas and information.  
	<br /><br />
</ol>
That's my admittedly short and imperfect list.  I would love your comments regarding books and techniques that you've used to spark innovation in your teams.  
 ]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/innovate-much.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/leadership/innovate-much.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Leadership</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Interview with Jeff Terry on Health Business Blog</title>
                <description><![CDATA[ David Williams of the Health Business Blog recently interviewed me about capacity management.  You can listen <a href="http://www.healthbusinessblog.com/2011/07/hospital-capacity-management-interview-with-ge-performance-solutions/">here</a>.
<br /><br />
David asked excellent questions about hospital economics, emerging technologies and the difference between capacity management and traditional definitions of occupancy and utilization.  I invite you to share in this featured podcast and welcome your thoughts and ideas.
]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/capacity-strategy-development/interview-with-jeff-terry-on-health-business-blog.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/capacity-strategy-development/interview-with-jeff-terry-on-health-business-blog.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Capacity Strategy Development</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Navigating the Hospital Superhighway</title>
                <description><![CDATA[On a recent drive from Chicago to Milwaukee, I noticed quite a few similarities between drivers dealing with traffic and hospitals managing capacity.  Without the proper tools and information, both situations cause people to act hastily which leads to a variety of results.  Have you seen these driver / hospital situations before?  Let's take a look at how some of these drivers navigate: 
<br /><br />
Driver A: "Captain Oblivious."  This driver leaves the house with very little information - simply a destination.  He follows the signs and hopes for the best.  Often this is the car plodding along in the left-hand lane completely unaware that it is holding up multiple cars behind it because the driver is occupied with something other than the road - talking on a cellphone, applying makeup, singing along to the radio, etc.  Not only is he annoying to other drivers, but also poses a safety issue due to a lack of attentiveness.  Hospitals do the same thing when they aren't reviewing the right metrics, overlooking market trends, or actively soliciting their staff for input.  They simply function the same way they always have and let the operation run itself - whether that is running at a utilization of 60% with many inefficiencies; or over 85% with every day full of chaos and bending over backwards to make things work.  Essentially, they take a "hope for the best" mentality that they will sustain any environmental challenges, putting themselves at risk in a variety of ways - physician and staff retention, high LOS, loss of market share/volume, patient satisfaction, patient safety, and even regulatory compliance.
<br /><br />
Driver B: "Maniac Marvin."  Marvin is the aggressive driver that habitually changes lanes in an effort to get to his destination as soon as possible.  While the intention is not necessarily wrong, he often makes abrupt decisions based on very little information and without any forethought about the long-term impact.  He sees a small opening in a lane and takes it, but soon finds that he's stuck behind another slow car while all of the cars he already passed slowly move ahead once again.  You'll also often see him on the side of the road fuming as the state trooper writes him a speeding ticket.  Like Marvin, healthcare organizations do the same thing when they try to alleviate bottlenecks by making 'on the fly' decisions, which ultimately can result in more problems downstream or in related areas.  Examples of this are transferring patients unnecessarily, increasing/decreasing staffing levels in a reactive manner, tweaking processes in one department without analyzing downstream patient flow effects on another, or making changes to hours of operation without evaluating information.  These decisions have an impact on the efficiency of the hospital and affect important outcomes such as length of stay, patient safety, volumes, and financials.
<br /><br />
And then there is Driver C: "Jimmy GPS."  We've finally moved onto a situation where a driver is using information to improve their outcomes.  Jimmy has a GPS with integrated traffic notifications - allowing for him to make better decisions and re-route when necessary.  Hospitals with the right bed board functionality - as well as an empowered bed management center -use information to better place patients in the right bed and enable the alleviation of bottlenecks as they develop.  However, this isn't a silver bullet on the road or in the hospital - the GPS won't allow Jimmy to lift off and fly over traffic or congestion, just as an advanced bed board can't create another bed.
<br /><br />
Indeed, the reality is that the environment of the majority of healthcare systems today plays out in a combination of the four examples listed above.  Even with the best intentions, the best outcome is not always within reach.  The future lies in the further enhancement of prediction technologies, coupled with three well-functioning aspects of hospital operations: 
<ol>
	<li>Effective and autonomous governance structures, with multi-disciplinary participation</li>
	<li>Schedules that are designed to ensure steady flow and a reduction in peaks and valleys of arrivals/admissions of patients</li>
	<li>Efficient workflows that support the entire system</li>
</ol>
Using real-time information to make informed decisions allows drivers to determine where traffic is going to occur before they get behind the wheel...the most efficient route will be mapped given analysis of current data.  Similarly, as hospitals become more sophisticated, they will be able to use aggregate data from multiple sources to correctly forecast bed/unit demand and avoid congestion before it starts.  These systems will not only help with daily operations, but also allow administrators to more effectively map out resources to accommodate the future demand, thus improving the hospital's "navigation highway."
 ]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/operational-transformations/navigating-the-hospital-superhighway.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/operational-transformations/navigating-the-hospital-superhighway.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Operational Transformations</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>iPod, iPad, iHop.  Innovation for the rest of us.</title>
                <description><![CDATA[How incredible is Apple?  Apple transformed computing, music, phones and computing again.  Consider this:  in 2009, tablet computers basically didn't exist.  In April 2010, Apple launched the iPad.  In 2011, about 50 million tablet computers will be sold.  Wow.  That's transformation.  
<br /><br />
Leaders across healthcare are searching for similar transformational innovation.  It's everywhere; at the Kaiser's Garfield Health Care Innovation Center in California, at the NHS's Heath Innovation and Education Cluster (HIEC) in London, at The Joint Commission's Center for Transforming Healthcare...  Many readers of this blog have been recently involved with CMS's new Center for Innovation and the Partnership for Patients.  And, I went to iHop.  Innovation is everywhere.  
<br /><br />
What do we expect from all this innovation?  I've spoken with innovators in Baltimore, Chicago and Dallas about the "nursing unit of the future."  Some are working on it already.  The idea is simple:  let's design perfect safe loving efficient nursing units complete with all devices, tools, interfaces, interoperability, floor plan and room plan.  Rather than depending upon leaders in hospitals to piece a unit together when they're assigned to oversee construction of the new hospital, let's do it for them.  
<br /><br />
Isn't that how aviation works?  United Airlines doesn't piece together planes... Boeing and Airbus do it for them.  Better yet - what would Apple do?  Wouldn't they innovate and transform how we even think about nursing units?  In a year or two, wouldn't we all wonder how healthcare functioned before iUnits arrived?
<br /><br />
Maybe.  Maybe not.  
<br /><br />
Apple-like innovation may be too much to hope for.  
<br /><br />
But what about iHop?  Maybe they're a better model.  IHOP operates 1,500 restaurants.  And, like healthcare, the last few years have not been easy as a variety of forces have put new downward pressure on margin.
<br /><br />
IHOP's innovation has been to adapt without losing their identity.  In order to serve the growing health conscious market, they've added a Simple &amp; Fit section to the menu.  The impressive part is they've done so without losing their identity.  Moreover, Simple &amp; Fit is clever in that it not only highlights healthy options, like Simple &amp; Fit Seasonal Fresh Fruit Crepes.  It also explains how to modify any entree to make it healthier, e.g., no butter, grilled chicken, egg whites, etc.  The beauty of this approach is to inform the consumer on what might be ordered and prepare the server for healthy requests.  This is not trivial as no one likes getting the "you're so high maintenance" look.  All in all, iHop's innovation is impressive.  It is still iHop but healthier, more current and probably more profitable.  
<br /><br />
That's innovation.  And, maybe it's realistic innovation.  Hospitals are, after all, hospitals.  Our challenge is to continue to deliver great care for millions of patients.  We just need to be a bit more efficient, a bit safer, a bit more pleasant, a bit...  iHop anyone? <br /><br />

1.	 <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-12-02/acer-aims-to-capture-15-of-tablet-pc-market-in-2011.html">Acer Aims to Capture 15% of Tablet PC Market in 2011</a><br />
2.	<a href="http://www.ihop.com/index.php?Itemid=5&amp;id=21&amp;option=com_content&amp;task=view">IHOP</a> 
]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/strategy-development-activation/ipod-ipad-ihop-innovation-for-the-rest-of-us.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/strategy-development-activation/ipod-ipad-ihop-innovation-for-the-rest-of-us.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Strategy Development &amp; Activation</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Stretch your pinkie toes </title>
                <description><![CDATA[When is the last time you paid much attention to your pinkie toes?  I must say that it had been a while for me.  Then I started running in "five-finger shoes."  These are those strange looking running shoes that separate each toe like a glove separates fingers.  Everyone should run in them at least once; squeezing each toe into its slot may be the best possible way to appreciate your pinkie toes.  <br /><br />

Five finger shoes force the foot to use dozens of small muscles that are underutilized or even dormant in more typical running shoes.  What happens next is amazing.  Underutilized muscles and joints start to engage, your stride lengthens, you run faster and easier, and then all of the sudden, you begin to value your pinkie toes.  Two once mostly forgotten appendages become essential. Their strength and length enable a transformation to better running.<br /><br />

Like most transformations, unlocking the potential of the pinkie toe begins awkwardly.  The guys who fit shoes at running stores know this.  That's why they coach, encourage, wait patiently and smile wryly as first-timers struggle into their five-finger shoes.  And for first-timers, the pinkie toe is the hardest part.  It just doesn't seem possible - like placing a roller board into the overhead of an Embraer or CRJ.  Before long of course, it's automatic.  My technique is to slide my pinkie finger along the outside of each toe - starting with the big toe - to firmly align it and slot it into place.  Stretching and slotting my pinkie toes is the best part.  <br /><br />

As we emerge from the 4th and 1st of July Holidays, I'm inspired to find and stretch pinkie toes within health systems.  Perhaps more importantly, I'm reminded that transformation requires both excitement and vision.  The experience of running in "goofy shoes" immediately captures the runner's attention and quickly makes clear that better, faster, more effective and easier running is possible.  Too often, transformations in patient safety, capacity management, culture, care models, etc. just sound like more work and more cost.  Maybe that's why I like my five-finger shoes so much...  They've not only transformed my running, they also cost less than traditional running shoes.<br /><br />

So, in honor of Independence Days in both Canada and America - days that celebrate two nations stretching those most important pinkie toes of freedom and liberty - here are five pinkie toes that might stretch your organization's performance.<br /><br /><ol><li>

Schedulers.  Schedulers are among our most important touch points with our patients and physicians.  Have we invested in their training, kept them current on new capabilities, and provided them with simple tools to connect the dots of need, capability and timing?
</li><li>Tribal knowledge.  Every hospital seems to have a core of nurses who have been there since... well, a long time.  You know them when you see them.  Too often we ask them not to "tell war stories" for fear it will undermine the latest improvement effort.  There's logic to that.  Then again, unlocking the knowledge of our most experienced and dedicated caregivers may be just the pinkie toe we've overlooked.
</li><li>Block time in the OR.  Most hospitals allocate blocks of OR time to either surgeons or service lines.  These allocations always make sense in the moment.  But, has our analysis kept up with evolving surgeon habits, OR capabilities and utilization patterns?  There are very few hospitals - maybe none - that couldn't improve the pinkie toe of block utilization.
</li><li>Mobile medical equipment.  Could we better manage battery powered life support equipment so we can find them in emergency situations (e.g., power loss)?  That's a pinkie toe that isn't needed every day but makes a big difference when we do.  
</li><li>Patient Safety Communities.  Patient Safety Organizations, like the GE PSO, are creating virtual patient safety communities within which providers can discuss the nitty gritty reality of patient safety in a protected environment.  That includes sharing with both local and global peers.  This promises to unlock pinkie toes everywhere.  </li></ol><br />

I'd love to hear about pinkie toes that you and your teams have found and exploited.  I'm certain others will benefit from the sharing.  Who knows, if we get enough pinkie toes maybe we'll have a contest to celebrate the most impactful discovery and transformation.
<br /><br />Stretch your pinkie toes!  
]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/operational-transformations/stretch-your-pinkie-toes.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/operational-transformations/stretch-your-pinkie-toes.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Operational Transformations</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>The End Game</title>
                <description><![CDATA[In Backgammon, this term refers to the final period of the game when the player begins  to bring all of their pieces into the home portion of the board and remove them one by one to win the game. This phase of the game is as critical as any other as the player must continue to make sound strategic decisions to continue their advantage or turn their game in their favor.  For many healthcare providers the End Game is an apt term to describe their current strategic position. Many of our clients find that they've done the hard work of transforming their quality and cost performance and yet they aren't seeing significant increases in market share or clearly established competitive differentials between themselves and their competitors. So what should leaders do to leverage the cost and quality performance that should be a strategic asset to their organization? 
<br /><br />
The short answer to this question is that leaders have not yet developed a laser-like focus on their organization's customer value proposition.  The following are some suggestions for areas that can help you address your value strategy: <br /><br /><ul><li>

Focus on process variability:  One of the key lessons of Six Sigma is the importance of measuring and managing the variance in your processes.   If one-half of your customers are delighted while the other half are dissatisfied has your organization really made progress?  Narrowing the variance in your processes will add more supporters in your customer base.</li><li>

Develop strategies based on the "real" value proposition of your key customers segments.  A segmentation analysis of your patient population may be helpful to determine disease states or geographic locations that are growing.  Provider organizations should survey patients in these populations to determine what they value most in making the choice among healthcare providers.  Do they want the very latest in medical equipment and treatments or do they value a high touch experience?  While the answer to this last question is likely to be a combination of the two, knowing and meeting the needs of your patients will be essential to future success.</li><li>
 
Similarly, understanding the value proposition of your organization to the physicians in your market is just as critical. While the uncertainties of healthcare reform make it difficult to predict your specific market demand for services over the next 3 - 5 years, developing some working assumptions that can form the basis of strategic actions will likely be more beneficial than delaying action until later in course of reform.  In our practice we find that a consensus building process with the leadership team which identifies what is known and the key questions to answer can guide provider organizations to the broad strokes of strategic actions. With the composition of an aligned physician group so critical to most provider strategies, having an early view on the desired specialty and geographic make-up of the physician group will help to avoid the mistakes of the last wave of physician / hospital consolidation in the 90's.  Once the desired framework is established, provider organizations should build an understanding of what factors the physicians in the market use to determine which hospitals to align with.  What is the relative importance of economics versus other determinants of the physician experience, such as scheduling, ancillary reporting processes, or connectivity / IT capability? </li><li>

Once the value proposition of the organization to its customers is we understood, market messages should be honed to focus on those specific areas and highlight key differences between the performance of the organization and key competitors. Given that we are in the early stages of quality and cost performance reporting, including an element of education on the meaning of various performance metrics may be beneficial to the community.   </li><li>

Finally, approach insurers in order to build collaborative efforts focused on developing unique reimbursement programs such as payment bundles that incorporate physician and hospital services across the episode of care, co-branded insurance products, or provider networks.   These collaborative efforts should only be undertaken once the organization's quality and cost performance is well managed and analytics can be performed to model any proposed payment methodologies.</li></ul>

It's becoming clearer every day that this "End Game" phase of market transformation will be every bit as challenging as the journey toward high quality / low cost care has been.  This stage is fundamentally about understanding the needs of patients and physicians, meeting those needs, and making sure that the customer perceives the high quality of your services.  Counting on an "If you build it, they will come" strategy regarding cost and quality performance will not be sufficient to insure success.  Like every other phase of the improvement in performance, this "End Game" has to be played with sound strategy development and execution.  
]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/strategy-development-activation/the-end-game.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/strategy-development-activation/the-end-game.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Strategy Development &amp; Activation</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>A New Era of Tight Capacity, Part 3 of a 3-Part Series</title>
                <description><![CDATA[In part 3 of this series blog: Mike Donoghue interviews Jeff Terry.<br/><br/>

Mike, I agree. The entire country seems frustrated by the enormity of the challenge of reforming health care and worn down by the contentiousness of the political debate. It has become all-consuming. But amidst the rancor, at GE we see great opportunity. Many of the endowments needed to reform care are already in place, and they are extraordinary - beginning with the best-trained and most talented workforce of any industry in the world.  As an industry, our charge is to put all of these extraordinary resources to their highest-valued use.<br /><br />
 
Toward that end, this white paper does three things:<br /><br />
 
<em>First</em>, it spells out the macroeconomic and political forces that have converged to finally force meaningful change in the way that we approach health care capacity. Thus, for example, the paper explains in simple terms how, after four decades of robust growth, the US-trained physician workforce is reaching a steady state. It has stopped growing just as the baby boom generation is beginning to retire and as thirty million newly insured Americans gain real access to care. There have been plans under way since the middle of the last decade to increase the number of medical school graduates, but the effort is a bit behind schedule and under the best case scenario, a meaningful increase in the number of physicians is a decade or more off in the future. As such, over time we must dramatically improve the productivity of the entire healthcare workforce, for the simple reason that for now its capacity is essentially fixed.<br /><br />
 
<em>Second</em>, it provides a simple healthcare management primer. It explains the economics of fixed costs in basic and intuitive terms, with applications to specific health care settings. It does this in ways that we think enhance understanding and at the same time provide guidance. We hope and trust that it will be a useful introduction even for those who have never before had any grounding in these basic management principles, and that it will both enhance understanding and spark useful discussions.<br /><br />
 
<em>Third</em>, it is a call to action. The industry has for too long pushed across-the-board, indiscriminate, and brute force methods for containing costs, and by all accounts they have failed. We assert here that the biggest reason for this failure derives from the fact that the bulk of health care costs come not from utilizing our already installed health care infrastructure, but rather from building that infrastructure and maintaining it at the ready. We can be far better stewards of these extraordinary endowments, providing better care at lower cost and with greater patient and caregiver satisfaction. Indeed, we see more effective stewardship of capacity as the only way to get a handle on this industry's fundamental problems.<br /><br />
 
Mike, David, and I enjoyed putting this paper together. We hope others enjoy reading it and putting it to good use.<br /><br />

<strong>"A New Era of Tight Capacity" Blog Links:</strong><br/>
<a href="/capacity/strategy-development/a-new-era-of-tight-capacity-part-1-of-a-3-part-series.php">A New Era of Tight Capacity, Part 1 of a 3-Part Series</a><br/>
<a href="/capacity/strategy-development/a-new-era-of-tight-capacity-part-2-of-a-3-part-series.php">A New Era of Tight Capacity, Part 2 of a 3-Part Series</a><br/>
<br/>


<b>For More Information</b><br />
White Paper: <a href="/capacity/patient-flow-scheduling/management-201-a-new-era-of-tight-capacity.php">Management 201: A New Era Of Tight Capacity</a>

<br />Poll: <a href="http://nextlevel.gehealthcare.com/polls/why-is-it-difficult-to-find-beds-for-patients-in-your-hospital.php" TARGET="_blank">Why Is It Difficult To Find Beds For Patients In Your Hospital</a>

<br />Self Assessment Tool: <a href="http://nextlevel.gehealthcare.com/self-assessment-tools/capacity-optimizer-tool.php" target="_blank">Capacity Optimizer Tool</a>
 ]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/capacity-strategy-development/a-new-era-of-tight-capacity-part-3-of-a-3-part-series.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/capacity-strategy-development/a-new-era-of-tight-capacity-part-3-of-a-3-part-series.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Capacity Strategy Development</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>A New Era of Tight Capacity, Part 2 of a 3-Part Series</title>
                <description><![CDATA[In part 2 of this series blog, Mike Donoghue expands on the issues of capacity and utilization.<br/><br/>

(Continued) Dr. David Butz:  Mike, let me now ask you ... As clear as these fixed costs are to hospital and health system leaders, do those leaders seem to you trapped by the "fee-for-service" mindset? I'm curious, how do you redirect attention toward this capacity approach when the culture presently seems so focused on rationing of care and reductions in utilization? Aren't these leaders getting mixed messages?<br /><br />

Many hospitals focus process improvement efforts around reducing length of stay, more timely discharging of patients, turning over vacated beds more rapidly, and filling those beds with new patients from the ED and PACU.  Improving these processes is not enough to optimize capacity utilization. Truly, many healthcare executives are operating in a complacent mode - or are just beginning to understand that they need to recognize capacity issues (both shortages and overhangs) and align capacity with demand in order to operate in this new environment of healthcare reform. Most hospital executives understand that census variability exists but are often unwilling to address the controllable causes of that variability - which is often due to politics - and ineffective governance. The politics involved with making difficult changes to the elective schedules (in the OR and Cath Lab for example) presents an enormous challenge. Furthermore the outcome of the changes is nearly impossible to predict without trial and error - unless of course - the changes could be modeled. <br /><br />

We use simulation modeling to provide a safe environment to test how changes made to processes and schedules affect the system as a whole. The output of the model can be a valuable tool to get buy-in for changes. Surgeons and administration can see that by changing the arrival patterns of elective patients can decrease congestion in the PACU, ED and Inpatient Units. They can see how these changes can improve throughput and reduce length of stay across the entire system (ED, OR, PACU, ICU, Med-Surg units, and discharge). It also helps to determine how much capacity is necessary to treat expected patient volumes. Armed with this information, staffing beds becomes more predictable and less risky to patients.<br /><br />

Overall, what organizations need is comprehensive capacity management plan that anticipates events and informs action - to manage expected growth.  The airline industry recognized their capacity problems with utilization back in the 1990s and developed a strategic plan to improve their capacity utilization.  Prior to 1993, the capacity utilization of US airlines hovered between 57% and 63%.  Then, from 1993 to 2007, the airlines increased their utilization to 80%.  In order to serve our communities and maintain financial health, hospitals must follow suit.  Why does this matter?  It matters because hospitals - like airlines and newspapers - are fixed cost businesses.  Utilization is the most important determinant of financial success. The solution to our new era is that we need to: 1) decrease cost, 2) increase utilization, 3) reduce variability, and 4) increase efficiency in order to operate at Medicare reimbursement rates (healthcare reform) while still delivering safe and sustainable care.<br /><br />

<strong>"A New Era of Tight Capacity" Blog Links:</strong><br/>
<a href="/capacity/strategy-development/a-new-era-of-tight-capacity-part-1-of-a-3-part-series.php">A New Era of Tight Capacity, Part 1 of a 3-Part Series</a><br/>
<a href="/capacity/strategy-development/a-new-era-of-tight-capacity-part-3-of-a-3-part-series.php">A New Era of Tight Capacity, Part 3 of a 3-Part Series</a><br/><br/>

<b>For More Information</b><br />
White Paper: <a href="/capacity/patient-flow-scheduling/management-201-a-new-era-of-tight-capacity.php">Management 201: A New Era Of Tight Capacity</a>

<br />Poll: <a href="/polls/why-is-it-difficult-to-find-beds-for-patients-in-your-hospital.php">Why Is It Difficult To Find Beds For Patients In Your Hospital</a>

<br />Self Assessment Tool: <a href="/self-assessment-tools/capacity-optimizer-tool.php" target="_blank">Capacity Optimizer Tool</a>

]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/capacity-strategy-development/a-new-era-of-tight-capacity-part-2-of-a-3-part-series.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/capacity-strategy-development/a-new-era-of-tight-capacity-part-2-of-a-3-part-series.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Capacity Strategy Development</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>A New Era of Tight Capacity, Part 1 of a 3-Part Series</title>
                <description><![CDATA[In part 1 of this series, Mike Donoghue interviews healthcare economist David Butz.<br /><br />

Mike Donoghue: <br />
GE Healthcare Performance Solutions recently released a new patient care capacity management (PCCM) whitepaper entitled: Management 201: A New Era of Tight Capacity.  David - could you explain why we felt the need for this paper, and even more importantly, why we focused on capacity?<br /><br />

Dr. David Butz:<br />
I have long preached that most healthcare costs are fixed. They involve creating capacity and maintaining it 'at the ready'.  By capacity, I mean all of the endowments of a state-of-the-art health system: brick and mortar, equipment, a highly-trained workforce, information technology, a network of ongoing relationships and organizational infrastructure, and many other 'hard and soft' assets. The expense of creating these endowments--or capacity--is massive.  In contrast, the incremental cost of delivering care is relatively modest.  Indeed, the answer to this country's rising healthcare costs is to be better stewards of capacity rather than merely brute-force rationers of care 'on the margin'.  I am as zealous as anyone about cutting costs but for far too long we've been going about it in the wrong way.  
<br /><br />
In healthcare, costs are poorly understood. It's a fixed cost business governed by a purely variable cost, 'fee-for-service' business model. The underlying costs of capacity are obscured, and the disconnect is debilitating. As I tell my business students, the cost of listening to an iPod is incurred when you purchase it, and over time as you buy music, create play lists, and ready the iPod for use. Thereafter, listening to songs is essentially free. In healthcare, because we 'pay by the song', it appears that the way to save money is to listen to fewer songs--to ration care (and reduce utilization). I have bad news for those who manage their systems this way: third-party payers benefit from your efforts, but your system brings in less revenue while saving the system relatively little.
<br /><br />
Like many, I consider our 'fee-for-service' business model to be a root cause of the industry's problems. In every other industry, prices reflect capacity costs--essentially, we pay more at peak demand times than off-peak.  For example, taverns have happy hours; electric utilities charge more in the summer; natural gas costs more in the winter; and of course we know how the airlines charge. The University of Michigan charges more for a football ticket when the opponent is Ohio State than when it is Kent State!  But in healthcare, we 'pay by the song', and it's the same price every day. If we play fewer songs, it doesn't matter because the savings appear the same. It doesn't matter whether we curb demand in the ED at 4pm when capacity is egregiously oversubscribed or at 3am when there is literally zero opportunity cost of the resources used. Rationing care does not lead to more effective utilization of fixed-cost resources.  
<br /><br />
So how do we move forward and appropriately manage our capacity?  Let me be clear: it would be a very bad idea to adopt the peak-load pricing of other industries. Fortunately, there are many capacity management tools available--such as breaking bottlenecks and reducing 'batching' - which are simple, inexpensive, low-risk, and lead to sustained and often dramatic gains. Overall, there are huge opportunities for 'quick wins' that can build momentum for more ambitious efforts.
<br /><br />
I enjoyed working with Jeff and Mike on this paper because I think it nicely blends first principles with GE's real-world experience.  The three of us sense great urgency. A confluence of macroeconomic forces has created a perfect storm of capacity issues that reflect both over and under-utilization of our nation's healthcare resources. Our goal with this paper is to describe this perfect storm--according to economic principles and practical insights--and to highlight opportunities for improved capacity management.
<br /><br />
So Mike, let me now ask you ... As clear as these fixed costs are to hospital and health system leaders, do they seem trapped by the 'fee-for-service' mindset?  I'm curious, how do you redirect attention toward this capacity approach when the culture presently seems so focused on rationing care and reductions in utilization? Aren't these leaders getting mixed messages?
<br /><br />

<strong>"A New Era of Tight Capacity" Blog Links:</strong><br />
<a href="http://nextlevel.gehealthcare.com/capacity/strategy-development/a-new-era-of-tight-capacity-part-2-of-a-3-part-series.php">A New Era of Tight Capacity, Part 2 of a 3-Part Series</a><br />
<a href="http://nextlevel.gehealthcare.com/capacity/strategy-development/a-new-era-of-tight-capacity-part-3-of-a-3-part-series.php">A New Era of Tight Capacity, Part 3 of a 3-Part Series</a><br /><br />

<b>For More Information</b><br />
Poll: <a href="http://nextlevel.gehealthcare.com/polls/why-is-it-difficult-to-find-beds-for-patients-in-your-hospital.php" target="_blank">Why Is It Difficult To Find Beds For Patients In Your Hospital</a>

<br />Self Assessment Tool: <a href="http://nextlevel.gehealthcare.com/self-assessment-tools/capacity-optimizer-tool.php" target="_blank">Capacity Optimizer Tool</a>]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/capacity-strategy-development/a-new-era-of-tight-capacity-part-1-of-a-3-part-series.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/capacity-strategy-development/a-new-era-of-tight-capacity-part-1-of-a-3-part-series.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Capacity Strategy Development</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Governance starts with principles, not policies</title>
                <description><![CDATA[In healthcare, when we think about governance structures, the first thought that comes to mind are Administrators and the Board of Directors. But if you really understand healthcare and healthcare providers, you understand that top-down directives are not popular with either the medical staff or hospital staff - particularly concerning how their jobs are performed and the guidelines they follow to deliver excellent patient care. Instead, these stakeholders tend to respond better when their peers are delivering the message, such as we see in peer review processes.<br /><br />

In order to build this type of environment, inclusiveness must be a guiding principle; hospitals must build or restructure governing bodies with a composition that includes administration, staff and physicians. For example, let's say your organization has issues with release times for the OR block schedule.  If an administrator tells Surgeon A that he or she must release their block a week in advance, Surgeon A will come up with multiple excuses as to why this release time will not work - including the fact that the administrator is not a doctor and does not understand how his specialty works, in addition to how special his practice really is! Now, if another Surgeon were to communicate the same message and explain the premise for the change, it is much more likely that Surgeon A will agree to the change. Indeed, we are socially more inclined to accept and be flexible to 'change' when we are approached by our colleagues whom have an understanding of our work and the variables involved.  Essentially, inclusiveness is the key behind building policies with principles. To achieve success in virtually any area, organizations need a cohesive governance structure where administration, management, staff and physicians decide together on what the right direction and approach should be, whether it be for the OR, for a center of excellence, or for the broader system.<br /><br />

I have been involved in helping many organizations set up governance structures like these, particularly in the OR, and I've seen consistent success in achieving sustainable results. Once the right structure is in place in an OR, problems that were intractable become manageable: improving room turn-around-time, holding teams accountable for on time starts and on time arrivals, re-allocating block time, improving pre-surgical documentation, and the list continues. Helping clients through this process requires just the right combination of principles of collaboration, communication, and commitment - and a little magic doesn't hurt!
<br /><br />With that in mind, here are a few key things to consider as you think about Perioperative governance:  <br /><br /><ol><li>&nbsp;What are the stated principles of this department?  (These should precede and inform the policies and procedures).  
</li><li>When was the last time we reviewed those principles?  How many of the committee members were in position when that was last done?
</li><li>Do we have the right committees in place and the right structure for those committees?
</li><li>Do we have the right members on the committee? For example, is every specialty represented on the Block Committee and/or OR Governance Committee; is the chair an unbiased individual that commands respect; is there a mix of high volume vs. low volume surgeons and supporting vs. non-supporting surgeons and block vs. non-block surgeons? 
</li><li>Is leadership ready to address the challenges raised by these committees? 
</li><li>Are the committees tracking the right metrics and utilizing that information to make data-driven decisions?

</li></ol><br />In summary, I advocate that before attempting to tackle strategic or operational improvement, first take a hard look at your governance structure to ensure it has the right members, with the ability to make good decisions and implement sustainable change based on their decisions.  Governance starts with principles, not policies.
]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/or-transformation/governance-starts-with-principles-not-policies.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/or-transformation/governance-starts-with-principles-not-policies.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">OR Transformation</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>How Hefty Are Your Plans?</title>
                <description><![CDATA[<a href="/leadership-strategy/leadership/making-the-elephant-dance.php">Last week</a> I talked about the delicate balancing act all healthcare providers must stick to in today's evolving operating environment, just like a circus elephant standing at a point balance on a ball that could slip away at any second.  I closed my blog with a mention that while much of the future landscape and realization of the full potential of ACO's is still unknown, there are many areas where healthcare leaders can focus today to poise themselves for results in this changed future.  To me, the first step to getting our industry closer to that balance point is a keen understanding of your organization's own market.   Just as understanding the terrain to be covered is essential before beginning any journey, developing strong, external facing strategic plans that focus on the consumer will be essential to the transformation of the healthcare industry.
<br /><br /><b>
Develop Strong, Customer Facing Strategic Plans
</b><br /><br />
Historically, strategic plans have been documents that were developed every three to five years by providers to define large scale actions like additions to the service line portfolio or facility development.  These plans rarely contained a full blueprint for the success and performance of the organization and many times contained items that were never implemented.  
<br /><br />
Instead of these static plans, I advise that the annual strategic planning process assess key market trends, customer needs, the competitive landscape, and other strategic measures to increase its effectiveness, agility, and to make it more actionable.  I have found that these strategic planning processes can be essential in insuring that tipping points in the market and customer sentiment are identified and provider strategies are shifted accordingly. 
<br /><br />
Strategic plans should also make decisions regarding service portfolio mix and even more importantly, how hospitals, physicians and other provider partners should work together in their care delivery system (ACO or other).  These decisions need to be made on the basis of a well-reasoned and data based plan rather than on an opportunistic basis.  
<br /><br />
Lastly, plans should not only be used to establish goals for growth and service mix, they should incorporate quality and cost goals as well.  These latter attributes will be of growing importance to providers to help differentiate in the market and in establishing a definite pathway to excellence.  
<br /><br />
Come back next week as I expand further on focusing on the consumer.
 <br /><br />]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/strategy-development-activation/how-hefty-are-your-plans.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/strategy-development-activation/how-hefty-are-your-plans.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Strategy Development &amp; Activation</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
            <item>
                <title>Solve capacity problems... without the last-minute panic!</title>
                <description><![CDATA[<i>This is Part 2 of a 4-part series titled "Random Acts of Utilization - A Look at the IHI Flow Diagnostic". </i><br /><br /><i><b>Calvin: You can't just turn on creativity like a faucet. You have to be in the right mood.<br />Hobbes: What mood is that?<br />Calvin: Last minute panic!</b></i><br /><blockquote><i>-Calvin and Hobbes</i><br /></blockquote><br />I <a href="/capacity/strategy-development/random-acts-of-utilization-part-1-of-4.php">previously blogged</a> about the need for hospitals in Quadrant 2 of the IHI Flow Diagnostic to have very deliberate processes for improving capacity utilization. Those hospitals have high adjusted bed turns (&gt;90) and high utilization of staffed beds (&gt;90%).<br /><br />In this post, I will describe characteristics of those hospitals in <b>Quadrant 3</b> (&lt;90 adjusted bed turns and &lt;90% utilization). About 60% of the nation's hospitals fall into Quadrant 3. Many of these hospitals are underutilized and yet still experience the effects of overcrowding on occasion. While some of these hospitals seek growth opportunities to treat more patients with the existing capacity, others strive to treat the same amount of patients with fewer staffed beds. Both strategies can effectively increase bed turns and capacity utilization.<br /><br />Many of the hospitals that I visit today are finding creative ways to flex capacity in response to sometimes-dramatic swings in inpatient census. In a <a href="/capacity/patient-flow-scheduling/what-are-5-ways-to-get-surgeons-to-drive-change.php">previous post</a>, I looked to Calvin and Hobbes for inspiration when writing about changing surgeon behavior. When speaking of creativity, I think Calvin has good intentions but I feel there is a more effective way to manage capacity without the last minute panic. Rather than being reactive, hospitals can take a more proactive approach that is safer for patients and staff and decreases the episodes of last minute panic. This more scientific approach is to:<br /><ol><li>Decrease controllable census variability by smoothing elective admissions.</li><li>Utilize historical patient data and simulation modeling to determine the right number of each type of bed that is required to treat the expected patient population.</li><li>Expedite critical activities on each patient's care plan with bed management workflow tools.</li></ol><br />Check out the <a href="/self-assessment-tools/ihi-patient-flow-diagnostic-tool.php">IHI tool</a> to see where your hospital falls. <br /><br />Does your hospital fall into Quadrant 3? What improvement strategies have you deployed? Are you seeking to treat more patients in the existing infrastructure or treat the same number of patients more efficiently? Please share your thoughts and check back in the coming weeks as I post about strategies for the other quadrants. ]]></description>
                <link>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/capacity-strategy-development/solve-capacity-problems-without-the-last-minute-panic.php</link>
                <guid>http://partners.gehealthcare.com/our-capabilities/capacity-strategy-development/solve-capacity-problems-without-the-last-minute-panic.php</guid>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blog</category>
        
                    <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Capacity Strategy Development</category>
        
        
                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 06:00:47 -0600</pubDate>
            </item>
    
        </channel>
    </rss>

