I could–should–definitely clean up the language and syntax, and probably work this draft into a longer, more coherent piece. For the moment, though, it exists as a couple of recent thoughts cobbled together into something a bit larger. We’ll see what happens from here.

The source of innovation resides neither in the language of tax breaks and subsidizations, nor the walls of a small business incubator or even the loan check for a creative enterprise. These strategies can encourage the launch of a business and help bring creative ideas to life, but the development process relies primarily on the ability of an individual to first begin to imagine an innovative solution. In the 18^th century, the British Parliament’s Board of Longitude directly supported individuals engaged in research to develop a reliable technique to calculate longitude at sea, the results of which ultimately secured the British preeminence as a naval power.[1] In more recent years, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Investigator Program has adopted a similar strategy: investment in “people, not projects.”[2]

By recognizing exceptional potential and providing long-term funding, conditional on progress rather than product, this research model has produced some of the greatest and most-referenced biomedical breakthroughs of the last two decades.[3]

The terms of such a program involve higher risk on behalf of the supporting institution, but the potential for reward is much higher as well. If North Carolina wants to demonstrate its commitment to becoming a leader in the burgeoning industries of twenty-first century, the launch of the North Carolina Innovative Research Fellows program would create unparalleled opportunities for brilliant minds to engage in long-term ground-breaking research and development. The state already boasts some of the greatest universities and high-tech research parks in the world: with resources already available, the state could continue to attract highly innovative individuals by tying the Fellowship to obtaining residency for the duration of support.

The state can—and should—explore opportunities to encourage homegrown entrepreneurship and support start-ups. The greatest and most innovative advances will ultimately, however, stem from people, not firms.

---

[1] “John Harrison and the Longitude Problem.” Royal Observatory & history of astronomy. 2008. National Maritime Museum, Web. 27 Jan 2010. <http://www.nmm.ac.uk/harrison&gt;.

[2] “The HHMI Investigator Program.” Howard Hughes Medical Institue, Web. 27 Jan 2010. <http://www.hhmi.org/news/investigator_bkgnd.pdf&gt;.

[3] Ibid.

I never intended to be away from this blog for so long, to fail to document and reflect upon events affecting my life, my generation, and, to a point, my country. I could provide a litany of excuses, of course, but I rather hope that the same events which restricted my time to write will instead become topics of future blog posts.

A timeline, though, of events in my life since April that have brought me to this point:

-          I played a hand in shaping a phenomenally complex project, and from its failure learned much more about coalition-building and establishing a clear mission than anything about the subject of the project

-          I returned home from my first year of college, packed again in just under a week, and flew halfway across the country to an internship

-          While at said internship, I realized I was actually applying what I had learned the semester before to work at an actual job, offering a glitter of hope that I may yet develop a marketable skill set by the time I graduate

-          A quarterly board meeting pushed me farther to my limits than I have ever been tested before, but I didn’t break – what was, for me, an empowering yet humbling experience

-          A return home, another week of transition, and then back to school for RA training

-          And now I am here, looking ahead at a not-so-long semester, for the first time in my life starting to make decisions that will have substantial impact for several years down the road

To wrap this up, I wanted to highlight some bloggers who have challenged, inspired, or flat-out astounded me while I took my break from writing:

A few years ahead of me in life and experience, Alex J. Mann’s blog continues to challenge me to think about the broader picture and where I want to be after college. His writing style is excellent; the content thought-provoking.

Ryan Holiday has continued to develop his original posting on the “narrative fallacy.” I sincerely hope he one day writes a book – he could, I believe, explore any one of a variety of topics, but I would enjoy seeing him explore a subject at length, beyond the format and medium of the web.

Nate Green’s book and blog has consistently motivated me to get out of my chair and into the gym. I am, physically and mentally, a healthier, fitter person for this.

Finally, I have been thrilled to watch Andrew McMillen, with whom my first contact involved him questioning my double spacing after periods, develop a career through his blogging. I attend a university with a top-ranked journalism program, yet when I ask students how their classes consider blogs and web-based media and what they do independently to prepare themselves for the field, I typically receive blank stares. While I know very little about the industry and its future, I do believe McMillen is going about this the right (or at least the most interesting) way.

I’m a part of the earlier camp, but was definitely driven to pick Meditations back up after reading the Holiday’s piece on Ferriss’ blog. I fully expect to see an increased number of blog posts containing quotes by Aurelius, Seneca, and Epictetus in the coming months — I don’t think of this as a bad thing, but rather a prediction of a developing fad. I just hope that we will all have gained something by the time it passes.

With that said, here are two entries that I particularly enjoyed:

5.34 You can lead an untroubled life provided you can grow, can think and act systematically.

            Two characteristics shared by gods and med (and ever rational creature):

            i. Not to let others hold you back

          ii. To locate goodness in thinking and doing the right thing, and to limit your desires to that

5.35 If:

• this evil is not of my doing
• nor the result of it
• and the community is not endangered, 

              why should it bother me?
       Where’s the danger for the community?

I have been away from this blog for longer than I like, but only because there are not enough hours in the day. Life will calm down in about three weeks though, and I look forward to producing several pieces reflecting on both the year behind me and lessons I have learned.

Just what is service-learning? 

State Farm, one of the largest funders of service-learning projects in the world, defines it as:

a teaching method that combines service to the community with classroom curriculum. It is more than merely community service. It is a hands-on approach to mastering subject material while fostering civic responsibility.

Turn on the TV, listen to the radio, open up a (rapidly-failing) newspaper… it is not difficult to see that we live in troubled times. Starting local though, with long-term investment in our communities, is what will help us resolve these miseries. This is how we change the world.

And better yet, delicious offers a range of feedback options, providing quantitative data which relates articles to their assigned tags and reading habits of users.

In a way, it all seems frivolous: even without a specific count, I should have a general idea of what topics I read about the most. Quantifying this information has an interesting effect on me, though, as it provides much clearer information about my habits.

I have just begun to watch the development of a movement called ‘quantified self;’ Ben Casnocha’s blog was the first place I saw this idea mentioned, but I have since seen the practice transformed into hyperstylized ‘annual reports‘ of individual behavior, powered by Daytum. I think it would be very easy to fall into a trap of obsessively collecting data about one’s self, to the point of gross inefficiency, but the general idea backing the movement is very appealing — quite simply, take the time to get to know yourself and your habits.

So how does (not quite obsessively) tracking my reading habits get me anywhere?

From a very interesting article analyzing Leonardo da Vinci in The Chronicle of Higher Education:

If there is one conclusion to be drawn from the life of Leonardo, it is that procrastination reveals the things at which we are most gifted — the things we truly want to do. Procrastination is a calling away from something that we do against our desires toward something that we do for pleasure, in that joyful state of self-forgetful inspiration that we call genius.

I certainly am not claiming genius, nor do I dare compare my own dabbling in a couple different subjects to the (truly) Renaissance man endeavors of da Vinci. The article raises a valid point, however, in that what we do in our spare time can serve as a strong indicator of what truly interests us. I have talked before about my interest in public policy and city and regional planning — and in an academic sense, I would certainly prefer the study of those topics than, say, mathematics or British literature. I have room for other disciplines in my life, however, and branching out and reading more will certainly not undermine the path I am currently taking.

So, blame it on da Vinci if you wish, but I am allowing myself to think that the reading and tracking I do now might be worth more for my long-term happiness than I originally thought.

A few weeks ago, Jeff Widman was kind enough to take the time to engage me in a phone coversation about the direction I was thinking of taking in life. He started the conversation off with what should have been a simple question, but rather managed to leave me sputtering for an answer: ”What are your interests and passions?”

I had already begun to explore this topic in the past few months, but my inability to provide a definite response served as a wake-up call that a quest to find direction and advice would certainly be hindered by not even knowing for what I needed to ask.

That phone call not only helped prompt the beginning of a series of intermittent posts on finding one’s story, but also forced me to address what I consider my own interests and passions to be. I utilized, however, a different strategy than intensive self-reflection I thought might be required to manage this endeavor.  

My logic went something like this (and was partially revised after viewing Charlie Hoehn’s ‘How to Hack Someone’s Mind‘):

1. I read a fair number of articles each day that cover a decent range of subjects. 
2. I don’t actually file these articles, beyond leaving them clumped together in Google Reader. 
3. A current goal of mine is to be able to provide a clear response when asked what interests me and what topics I would like to pursue in greater focus. 
4. Cohesively, these articles ostensibly represent my interests. Putting them in decent order could potentially reveal to me answers to some of my larger questions.                                                                                                                                       a). Worst case scenario: I share a lot of fun articles with friends while injecting some organization into my life.

And so I began sharing articles on Facebook. And so I quickly realized that while Facebook does a lot, a top-notch social bookmarking site it is not. Thus began my foray into delicious.

—–

I plan to round out a lot in the follow-up to this post, as well as provide some insight as to what the title means. Thanks, as always, for reading this far.

A lot has been going on for  me lately, in terms of recognizing where I am and realizing where I want to go. My last post, in which I realized I was working in a similar capacity and undergoing thought processes closely related to the year before, really drove home how beneficial it can be to keep a documented record of what all is going on in my head. What follows is a list of ideas that have recently crossed my mind; I want to record them publicly with the hopes of staying focused on them long enough to act.

1). Earlier this week I took a l look at the “about me” section of my blog, and was slightly horrified by what I had written about myself a year before. I do not doubt for a moment that there is a serious chance that I will one day be equally disgusted by what I now have written, but I this is still a slight improvement.

2). Not only have I been reading a lot more articles than I usually do, I have been taking steps to actively provide them them with others. In the past month my “items shared” on Facebook have increased dramatically; I now also utilize delicious to keep the article links organized and available to others.

2a). Working on a group research project last night, I realized for the first time how potentially valuable a site like delicious could be in facilitating group research efforts. I am not the first person to have such an idea, but the epiphany that we could so effortlessly streamline our findings/sources sharing felt absolutely awesome.

3). In the past week, I have received information about a study abroad opportunity examining sustainability in city design, attended a lecture by one of the top experts on green urbanism, and examined some aspect of infrastructure or economic and community development in a number of classes. I truly believe in keeping as many doors open as possible, but increasingly I feel my interests in this (broad) subject strengthening.

4). I participated in a discussion last night in which the majority of us had been independently inspired by the same op-ed. Not only did I walk away with a stronger understanding of how to relate some of what Thomas Friedman observed to actions I can personally take, but this really passionate conversation did wonders for bridging gaps within the group and shaking up the dynamics.

5). I have started using Twitter again, and while I continue to have my reservations about all the ways this social media platform can benefit the world, there are some valuable bits within the noise. As I see it, if I can find just a few interesting blogs that I might not have otherwise seen, my efforts have been worth my time. 

I have had a lot of busy days and late nights, and many of friends don’t quite understand why I do what I do. My question: Is any of what I am pursuing considered work if I really enjoy all of it?

Ferriss’ article resonated so deeply with me, actually, I almost titled this post with the “Lead, follow…” quote, until I realized that I had ruminated on a similar topic almost exactly one year ago. I had to reread the post to remember what was on my mind in early 2008… interestingly enough, I do not believe that much has changed.

A little more than a year ago, my natural inclination to avoid risk became a source of frustration for me. I realized that unless I began forcing myself out of my comfort zone, I could never grow as a person. Since that point, I think I have done a better job at broadening my horizons and being willing to take action, even in the face of uncertainty.

Now, research published in Scientific American suggests that I began working to make these changes at a perfect time in my life:

Openness declines gradually over many years, often beginning in the 20s. As the years wear on, novelty becomes less and less stimulating, and the world outside someone’s own private and professional sanctums becomes increasingly less attractive….

For younger people, external changes were more likely to lead to internal transformation, but that was not the case for older individuals.

So, what does this mean to me? Last year I said “yes” to the opportunity to apply for a grant which would fund an environmental club at my school; this year, I have said “yes” to working as a policy consultant to help students prepare for PowerShift 2009, a massive youth summit focused on climate and clean energy policy. I think I am better for doing so.

Making these decisions has not yet become second-nature to me, and a preference for risk aversion may very well be a part of me that never changes. There is a big difference between jumping over a bonfire and jumping into a leadership role in a project, though, and exercising decisiveness will lead me to gain from the latter than the former.

I’m looking forward to see where I will be next year.

**********************

Related note: A friend commented on last year’s post and suggested this article on recognizing opportunity. I believe that Brian Kim makes a great point when he advocates to “start by taking a shot at the little things.”

*********************

Edit: I just found that Alex J. Mann posted a quote last week that came close to summing up the message behind this post:

“Great dangers always accompany great opportunities.  The possibility of destruction is always implicit in the act of creation.  Thus the greatest enemy of individual freedom is the individual himself.”

- Saul Alinsky

I don’t think there is a more impressive thing to do intellectually than turn over a long-held a opinion in light of new evidence.

Ryan Holiday’s latest post addresses the importance of being willing to reconsider one’s position on an issue, even at risk of appearing incosistent to others.

I have had a professor this semester who has really pushed our class to learn how to “reframe” issues — that is, taking what seems to be a problem and breaking it down into smaller areas and issues, finding difficulties associated with each issue, and addressing the causal factor behind a group of difficulties. You wind up finding alternative solutions to a part of the overarching problem, even if your approach seems less comprehensive than expected.

The comments left on Holiday’s post all offer a different interpretation of what he is saying — as noted above, I looked at this from a reframing perspective:

I think being able to [reframe an issue] well can occasionally give the impression of inconsistency — two problems may look very similar on the surface, but digging a little deeper reveals that the best approaches will be unique to the situation. If one is only used to looking at the superficial, though, it can be difficult to understand why the reactions might be different. I could be off my mark completely though, it’s just something I’ve been rolling around in my head for a while.

Meanwhile, as I mulled these things over, programmer and essayist Paul Graham was busy releasing a short article entitled ‘Keep Your Identity Small,’ in which he explores how discussions of politics and religion  usually turn into noisy but ineffectual debates that produce few positive results. His theory? People weave those topics into their identity, so a critique of the subject is easily perceived as an assault on one’s character.

If people can’t think clearly about anything that has become part of their identity, then all other things being equal, the best plan is to let as few things into your identity as possible.

Most people reading this will already be fairly tolerant. But there is a step beyond thinking of yourself as x but tolerating y: not even to consider yourself an x.

This is why wedge issues can become so divisive; when serving as part of a person’s identity, inconsistency on a subject could very well lead to questions of faith and purpose. And I am not calling for people to abandon all that they hold dear — rather, simply consider ways to examine the issue through different sets of lenses, and learn to look beyond the surface to engage in more fulfilling, more productive discussions.

As a side note: If anyone has found any really cool blogs (or articles) lately, please share. I am always looking to expand my reading list.

‘The Lecture System in Teaching Science‘ by Robert T. Morrison: A great alternative to the standard college lecture. I have some professors who definitely try to utilize a more discussion-based method, and the classes are much more rewarding for them doing so.

‘In Praise of Lo-Fi‘ by Jack Cheng: A few times a year I go to the beach, leave my laptop at home, ignore as many cell phones calls as possible, and do my best to just exist in peace for a few days. Sometimes my friends accompany me; we tend to play a lot of games with cards. It is wonderful.

‘Orientation‘ by Daniel Orozco: My friend mentioned to me that she had read a story in her creative writing class that I would absolutely love. She was right — it’s slow at the start and kind of dark, but should appeal to anyone familiar with that sort of office setting.

‘The Tragedy of the Commons‘ by Garrett Hardin: Classic article. I read this for an Urban Studies and Planning class, but I think it could interest folks in a variety of disciplines.

‘How America Lost the War on Drugs‘ by Ben Wallace-Wells: I absolutely love stories about crime, particularly those involving drug trafficking, use, etc.. Politics and musical preferences aside, Rolling Stone has still published some interesting articles about this dark realm over the years. In a similar vein: ‘Kid Cannabis‘ by Mark Binelli, and ‘Going Under‘ by Jason Zengerle, about opiate addiction among anesthesiologists.

And on the book front, I recently finished Steven Millhauser’s ‘The Knife Thrower and Other Stories‘. It was beautifully written, and made me want to once again try my hand at fiction.