By accepting items through email, Gootodo becomes an active partner in reducing the clutter in your inbox, which allows you to really focus your email activities separately from your time management activities. This lets you feel much less overwhelmed and stressed out, as well as making sure that you are able to find the information that you need and quickly respond to emails. The idea of day-based to do lists instead of a large list with due dates makes the day's work load feel much more manageable.

Very well put.

Try it here, free for one month: Gootodo.com

P.S. Yes, the name... the name. I polled Gootodo users this week - and the consensus is that we need a new name. Working on something short, easy to remember, easy to say, and available in .com. :)

According to Hill, by following his simple "weight loss" plan just one day a week, you can save $1000, lose 10 tons of carbon and be healthier. The tips offered are really fascinating such as how a NY-Bangkok trip generates half of your annual carbon emissions - in one trip! Yikes! So, choosing your plane and combining trips really does impact the emissions your generate. Essentially by becoming a smarter shopper, (food, flying, green power) you can at least cut your emissions in half, which is a bigger impact than just using a canvas shopping bag.

See also: Video of Graham Hill, Treehugger.com founder, at Gel 2009

I occasionally have fun commenting on companies that spend millions of dollars changing their logo without ever talking to customers.

But this one - if it's true - is really notable. Apparently Hertz conducted customer research - a 25- to 30-minute survey, including live-chat Q&A, according to one person - just to get feedback on the new logo. Just reactions to the graphical change. Not about what being a customer of Hertz is actually like, or why people choose Hertz (or not) over its competitors. Just the logo.

Translation: yes, they did customer research. But no, it still wasn't directed toward improving the customer experience.

What has to happen before large companies take an authentic interest in improving the customer experience? (I'm biased, but I've seen lots of companies dramatically improve their business metrics with some simple, common-sense research.)

The event was a success, and there's a lot I could say about what I learned and experienced there. But I'll just share some scattered thoughts.

We can fix healthcare.

I was struck by the number of real-world solutions we learned about. Improving the patient experience isn't something we need to wait for - it's happening RIGHT NOW, and has been for years, and we can learn from what's working:

• Dr. Bridget Duffy spoke about Code Lavender - where it came from, what it means to her, and how it works in several major hospitals. Living proof that the system can change - we can make improvements.

• Medical errors (described well by patient advocate Dan Ford) are getting better response, said Dr. Sigall Bell, and she has the data to show the advances.

• Pediatric wards all over the world are getting the gift of laughter, via Clown Care - we heard from founder Dr. Michael Christensen how subversion, risk, and improvisation played into the beginnings of the program almost 20 years ago (and continue today).

• Dr. John La Puma teaches and advocates, through ChefMD, better health through nutrition, especially where simple, healthy food can replace more expensive drugs.

• Bill Brownstein at Kids RX is running a pharmacy that listens to customers - answers the phone before the second ring - makes friendly deliveries - and still is in business. Serving the patient, it turns out, is good business.

• The cancer center at Johns Hopkins - working with Performance of a Lifetime - is changing the culture, actually making real-world improvements, to the day-to-day experience for oncology nurses (maybe the toughest job in the world), thus improving the care given to patients.

There is hope.

The theme of "hope" kept popping up throughout the event - organically - again and again. Dr. Mark Pochapin talked about why he never tells a cancer patient "you have x months to live," because there's always hope. He brought a former patient, pancreatic cancer survivor, to the stage to prove the point. She just turned 90.

Dr. Robert Martensen talked about dying with dignity - and what it means particularly for older women, who tend to outlive their husbands.

Olie Westheimer talked about a unique program that partners Parkinson's patients with a modern dance company. In the video she showed, patients who are facing this devastating disease talked about the hope and joy the program gives them.

A good first step is to acknowledge the other.

Bridget Duffy began the day by talking about how invisible she felt when she was in a wheelchair after an accident earlier this year.

Later, Dr. Javette Orgain took us through the day-to-day life of doctors in inner-city community health centers in Chicago.

Dr. Jim Withers gave a moving presentation about caring for the chronic homeless in Pittsburgh (and founding a worldwide "street medicine" movement). And the day finished with Daniel & Ken Trush, who run a music foundation for disabled people.

Attendees say it better than I do.

Several attendees have shared how they'd describe Gel Health; here are just three I thought encapsulated it well:

• "A place to be re-energized about the possibilities of what patient-centric healthcare delivery would and could look like, through real-life examples."

• "This is the only healthcare conference I know where the focus is on real people's needs and how they've been met. It doesn't lead with a technology solution."

• "A unique conference highlighting inspirational stories by thought provoking speakers who shared their ideas (and how they made them reality!) for creating positive experiences for various healthcare stakeholders."

Thanks again to everyone who was there.

For everyone else - I hope this gives some sense of the great progress quietly being made in healthcare, and what the real possibilities are for future transformatian.

For anyone who wants to vote for a "next year," I've put up a temporary discount (thru Friday) on Gel Health 2010 tickets. Click here to sign up.

I do hope to start posting videos within a few weeks on
Gel Videos - stay tuned (and meantime, watch a few!)

At Gap my chief duty was to fold clothing that had been unfolded by customers ... felt like an eternity. This was also true of working at Enterprise rental car and Starbucks, where all of our movements were measured and monetized. Perceptions of time, I found, are closely linked to the employees' feeling of freedom: The more constrained the environment, the slower things moved, and the less happy employees were.

In contrast, work at the Apple Store was set up so you were focused on accomplishing goals, not filling up time.

Guess which environment has the best customer experience.

Something tells me it's not going to go that way.

Tools are essential - and we need better tools than we have today - but it always raises a flag when I see someone announcing a new utopian era - based on yet more tools. (It's certainly an attractive proposition to the software industry - users ceding more control, and more attention, to more and more and more tools!)

The article covers more than the tools, and makes plenty of good points - worth a read. Just beware the boosterism.

It's shaping up to be a great event. And this program, this list of speakers, is only going to run once.

Gel is hard to describe because you have to be there to "get it." Though attendees have described it this way in the past.

But if you're ready to take a chance at a different kind of conference experience, sign up here.

This is why Google represents the antithesis of Apple. With Apple, it's all about simplicity. I once joked that at Apple they don't start with the product, they start with the advertisements. If they can't think up a good ad--if they can't tell you, in a few words, what this product does and why you simply must have it--they probably won't bother making the product.

Not sure I'd go so far as "antithesis," but good commentary overall on overly complex gee-whiz collaboration software.

If you can't explain what you've built, there's a problem.

See also: Google Wave doesn't stop information overload