<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dlvrit="http://feeds.dlvr.it/atom">
  <title>Jon Reed enterprise newsfeed</title>
  <link href="http://feeds.dlvr.it/ac6861e9e2d249fc92b2895b5ff7a2e0.xml" rel="self"/>
  <id>tag:dlvr.it,2018-03-23:ac6861e9e2d249fc92b2895b5ff7a2e0</id>
  <updated>2026-05-18T08:43:16-07:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name><![CDATA[Jon Reed enterprise newsfeed]]></name>
  </author>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-18:cbe53662062d5a5971a7d146e53b4788</id>
    <updated>2026-05-18T08:43:16-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[How Dangerous Is Anthropic’s Mythos AI?]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSbkn0" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://rdl.ink/render/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.schneier.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2026%2F05%2Fhow-dangerous-is-anthropics-mythos-ai.html" rel="enclosure" type="image/webp"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://rdl.ink/render/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.schneier.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2026%2F05%2Fhow-dangerous-is-anthropics-mythos-ai.html" /><br/>"While Anthropic’s model is really good at finding software vulnerabilities, so are other models. The UK’s AI Security Institute found that OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, already generally available, is comparable in capability. The company Aisle reproduced Anthropic’s published results with smaller, cheaper models.

At the same time, Anthropic’s refusal to publicly release its new model makes a virtue out of necessity. Mythos is very expensive to run, and the company doesn’t appear to have the resources for a general release. What better way to juice the company’s valuation than to hint at capabilities but not prove them, and then have others parrot their claims?"

<img src='https://rdl.ink/render/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.schneier.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2026%2F05%2Fhow-dangerous-is-anthropics-mythos-ai.html' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="uncategorized"/>
    <category term="ai"/>
    <category term="hacking"/>
    <category term="laws"/>
    <category term="llm"/>
    <category term="patching"/>
    <category term="regulation"/>
    <category term="vulnerabilities"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[How Dangerous Is Anthropic’s Mythos AI?]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-18:9d14f80b315fc03dbd53afc1b594c5e9</id>
    <updated>2026-05-18T08:43:14-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The AI Ferrari: Why Your CX Strategy is Stuck on Concrete Blocks - by @twieberneit]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSbkly" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjD50GTEOFdUfe77jl490DFQ_hU40g3s6MZWziKukjTV4AoibTRPLNa3tvuoetY07n2JxHZK9Ljwl6i3Q5yiWFyU8MMnxMjlhYogJwIh22eXrANEM9A0iPfQeEBWrLFkgSNUOzVFdP3P93KpQe8xhfv1UbwA2sNCSrBUC3Fhhk6iGSXBf8Rk1DYFR8UfQwH/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/CRMKonvo%20%23303%20-%20Data%20Readiness%20for%20AI%20and%20CX.png" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjD50GTEOFdUfe77jl490DFQ_hU40g3s6MZWziKukjTV4AoibTRPLNa3tvuoetY07n2JxHZK9Ljwl6i3Q5yiWFyU8MMnxMjlhYogJwIh22eXrANEM9A0iPfQeEBWrLFkgSNUOzVFdP3P93KpQe8xhfv1UbwA2sNCSrBUC3Fhhk6iGSXBf8Rk1DYFR8UfQwH/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/CRMKonvo%20%23303%20-%20Data%20Readiness%20for%20AI%20and%20CX.png" /><br/>"Do not attempt to "fix" your data silos with AI. Fix the silos so that AI can function. Bhawani suggests an agentic assessment of your data landscape to identify where the "shadow data" is hiding. If you feed an AI agent data from five disconnected silos, it will hallucinate five different versions of the truth. Clear out the "caves" of manual data and lead everything into a visible, connected stream. Only then will your Ferrari actually have the wheels it needs to move.

The age of the static database is over. The age of the contextual agent is here. Just make sure you aren't the one paying for a shiny red car that is permanently parked."

<img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjD50GTEOFdUfe77jl490DFQ_hU40g3s6MZWziKukjTV4AoibTRPLNa3tvuoetY07n2JxHZK9Ljwl6i3Q5yiWFyU8MMnxMjlhYogJwIh22eXrANEM9A0iPfQeEBWrLFkgSNUOzVFdP3P93KpQe8xhfv1UbwA2sNCSrBUC3Fhhk6iGSXBf8Rk1DYFR8UfQwH/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/CRMKonvo%20%23303%20-%20Data%20Readiness%20for%20AI%20and%20CX.png' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="ai"/>
    <category term="customer experience"/>
    <category term="data"/>
    <category term="strategy"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The AI Ferrari: Why Your CX Strategy is Stuck on Concrete Blocks - by @twieberneit]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-18:8cdbadf7980516ca07653325db275d50</id>
    <updated>2026-05-18T08:43:09-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The SAP Sapphire 2026 final review - podcast with @jonerp and @josheac #sap #sapphire #sapsapphire cc: @asug365]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSbkln" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://d2bwo9zemjwxh5.cloudfront.net/ep-logo/pbblog720012/jonitunesart_1200x628.jpg?s=b1645779e297c242a87a02202f71ef95&amp;e=jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://pbcdn1.podbean.com/imglogo/image-logo/720012/jonitunesart.jpg" /><br/>The SAP Sapphire 2026 final review - with Josh Greenbaum

https://ift.tt/lRuQkv3

In a time-honored tradition, on the Thursday morning after Sapphire 2026, Josh Greenbaum and I commandeered an abandoned session room at the Hilton to ask ourselves the burning questions: what the heck just happened? What we can take away? Where did SAP advance the conversation, or come up short? Given I have issued multiple podcast from the event, I issued another challenge: let's not repeat prior podcast topics as much as possible. Also, in the context of SAP's new "autonomous enterprise" all-in messaging, the clear/awkward question must be asked: has Greenbaum, one of the most vociferous agentic AI critics in the SAP ecosystem, especially in terms of ROI, changed his stance? And: what did we learn from all of our interactions with SAP execs and customers? And yes: the API data controversy is addressed here. 

We had an hour of hot topics to work through, and didn't even get to them all. But, a few timestamps: 

4:15 - AI and "Toolchain" advancements redux
16:43 - the API controversy breakdown - what we learned at Sapphire
26:00 - has Josh's stance on agentic AI changed? 
38:00 - the autonomous enterprise framing 
49:00 - SAP Connect, the business case challenge, and final hot seat questions

Note to listeners - if you believe in totally ad-free, totally unsponsored podcasts like my series - an increasingly rare thing - consider giving me a positive rating or share. There is intentionally no business model - these podcasts are entirely self-funded and it's your engagement with them that keeps them going.

via Busting the omnichannel - enterprise hacks and chats https://ift.tt/MmWGjvK

May 17, 2026 at 08:38AM

<img src='https://d2bwo9zemjwxh5.cloudfront.net/ep-logo/pbblog720012/jonitunesart_1200x628.jpg?s=b1645779e297c242a87a02202f71ef95&e=jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="IFTTT"/>
    <category term="Busting the omnichannel - enterprise hacks and chats"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The SAP Sapphire 2026 final review - podcast with @jonerp and @josheac #sap #sapphire #sapsapphire cc: @asug365]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-11:846985d6d9bc6705f2139b706aeb6495</id>
    <updated>2026-05-11T10:36:19-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Anthropic Skill scanners passed every check. The malicious code rode in on a test file. - by @louiscolumbus]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSTrD2" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/3eiQaAvEWnRMH513Vmb1P8/2b8e1c66223d7d287d133e979511696c/HERO.png?w=800&amp;q=75" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/3eiQaAvEWnRMH513Vmb1P8/2b8e1c66223d7d287d133e979511696c/HERO.png?w=800&q=75" /><br/>"Picture this scenario: An Anthropic Skill scanner runs a full analysis of a Skill pulled from ClawHub or skills.sh. Its markdown instructions are clean, and no prompt injection is detected. No shell commands are hiding in the SKILL.md. Green across the board.

The scanner never looked at the .test.ts file sitting one directory over. It didn’t need to. Test files aren’t part of the agent execution surface, so no publicly documented scanner inspects them (as of publication of this post). The file runs anyway. Not through the agent but through the test runner, with full access to the filesystem, environment variables, and SSH keys."

<img src='https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/3eiQaAvEWnRMH513Vmb1P8/2b8e1c66223d7d287d133e979511696c/HERO.png?w=800&q=75' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Anthropic Skill scanners passed every check. The malicious code rode in on a test file. - by @louiscolumbus]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-11:67b7de5c6b316a7f91cf17ff7141d296</id>
    <updated>2026-05-11T09:54:20-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[How Prudential CTO Liz Brand is approaching agentic AI, transformation - by @ldignan]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSTpJ5" rel="alternate"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA["Production grade or go home. Prudential, which works on multiple co-innovation projects with AWS, won't do pilots anymore. AWS won't take non-production work and neither will Brand's team. "AWS would only take production grade projects that we were committed to," explained Brand. "That's how we feel about our projects too. The ones we're committed to bring shorter time to value in production within months rather than years.""]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[How Prudential CTO Liz Brand is approaching agentic AI, transformation - by @ldignan]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-11:fcef23b2f74951f3146c9c87d5d0f484</id>
    <updated>2026-05-11T09:54:20-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[How much oxygen will SAP's new API suck up at Sapphire? - by @ldignan]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSTpJ4" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/05/screenshot_2026-05-07_154248.png.webp?itok=KaRw8bIM" rel="enclosure" type="image/webp"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/05/screenshot_2026-05-07_154248.png.webp?itok=KaRw8bIM" /><br/>"But you can also expect SAP’s new API policy to suck up more oxygen at Sapphire than the ERP vendor would like. CEO Christian Klein talked about API access on SAP’s earnings call. Klein had a meaty talk about APIs, customer data and what the vendor will protect. Key quotes include:"

<img src='https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/05/screenshot_2026-05-07_154248.png.webp?itok=KaRw8bIM' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[How much oxygen will SAP's new API suck up at Sapphire? - by @ldignan]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-11:6c6b6a13d38fcfea44182172865fab41</id>
    <updated>2026-05-11T09:54:19-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Distinguishing AI from Magic - by Esteban Kolsky]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSTpJ3" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/04/aftershots.png.webp?itok=Tyfcv7qh" rel="enclosure" type="image/webp"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/04/aftershots.png.webp?itok=Tyfcv7qh" /><br/>"The enterprise does not need AI to be magical; it needs AI to be governable. Magic in enterprise terms is anything that cannot be audited, repeated, governed, or trusted at scale. A consumer error is an annoyance; an enterprise error propagates through process, policy, compliance, and customer outcomes.

I could conclude that it is impossible for AI to replicate humans, but never forget the other two laws."

<img src='https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/04/aftershots.png.webp?itok=Tyfcv7qh' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Distinguishing AI from Magic - by Esteban Kolsky]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-11:acf988c14fa3518a49628c53e1736e24</id>
    <updated>2026-05-11T09:54:18-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[AI Slop & the Vulnerability Treadmill - via @RedMonk]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSTpG8" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="http://redmonk.com/kholterhoff/files/2026/05/CorgiTreadmill.gif" rel="enclosure" type="image/gif"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="http://redmonk.com/kholterhoff/files/2026/05/CorgiTreadmill.gif" /><br/>"Google, for its part, is betting that the answer is platform-level defense at machine speed. At Next ’26, the company unveiled what it’s calling “Agentic Defense“: a cybersecurity platform that merges Google’s Threat Intelligence and Security Operations with Wiz, the cloud security firm it acquired earlier this year. The headline numbers are sobering context for the investment: Google’s own M-Trends 2026 report found that the handoff time between an initial intrusion and a secondary threat actor has collapsed from eight hours to 22 seconds over the past three years (p. 55). At that velocity, human-speed triage is a rounding error."

<img src='http://redmonk.com/kholterhoff/files/2026/05/CorgiTreadmill.gif' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="ai"/>
    <category term="security"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[AI Slop & the Vulnerability Treadmill - via @RedMonk]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-11:d865b7deee8c115977dc0c8e8bd63b60</id>
    <updated>2026-05-11T08:18:13-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Vibe coding exposed 380,000 corporate apps — 5,000 held sensitive data]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSTjh4" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/3H8BkMlVjetAGClhRKtmFK/533b657c9dd2b63819c0db0d2f8c6559/5_000_vibe-coded_apps_just_proved_shadow_AI_is_the_new_S3_bucket_crisis.png?w=800&amp;q=75" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/3H8BkMlVjetAGClhRKtmFK/533b657c9dd2b63819c0db0d2f8c6559/5_000_vibe-coded_apps_just_proved_shadow_AI_is_the_new_S3_bucket_crisis.png?w=800&q=75" /><br/>"New research from Israeli cybersecurity firm RedAccess quantifies the scale. The firm discovered 380,000 publicly accessible assets, including applications, databases, and related infrastructure, built with vibe coding tools from Lovable, Base44, and Replit, as well as deployment platform Netlify. Roughly 5,000 of those assets, about 1.3%, contained sensitive corporate information. "

<img src='https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/3H8BkMlVjetAGClhRKtmFK/533b657c9dd2b63819c0db0d2f8c6559/5_000_vibe-coded_apps_just_proved_shadow_AI_is_the_new_S3_bucket_crisis.png?w=800&q=75' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Vibe coding exposed 380,000 corporate apps — 5,000 held sensitive data]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-11:5cca0df1f2e11c1b652e74356f177f1e</id>
    <updated>2026-05-11T08:18:09-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The AI Content Trap: Multiplying Mediocrity at Scale - by @twieberneit]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSTjg8" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjuasQ1zkruTCYvwR2wPLGSDuthddb4CQxwTf3xTooaDGfbgHlt8GHW9LrKyps1CxzchpdT37UOui9CouTQwUKumjUJ8o31Fa9e4x9q0YZNrMqTHl64OfKWLi1wh3kgxyR5NZ5nsPPtKJ7l6-1jJmRxaoeuRnNcpv8AFT_SxtG5pAcRGFzz_GOyv-Io7ztI/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/CRMKonvo%20%23302%20-%20effective%20marketing%20in%20the%20times%20of%20AI.png" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjuasQ1zkruTCYvwR2wPLGSDuthddb4CQxwTf3xTooaDGfbgHlt8GHW9LrKyps1CxzchpdT37UOui9CouTQwUKumjUJ8o31Fa9e4x9q0YZNrMqTHl64OfKWLi1wh3kgxyR5NZ5nsPPtKJ7l6-1jJmRxaoeuRnNcpv8AFT_SxtG5pAcRGFzz_GOyv-Io7ztI/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/CRMKonvo%20%23302%20-%20effective%20marketing%20in%20the%20times%20of%20AI.png" /><br/>"Currently, everyone is obsessed with the "Gen" in GenAI, but for CX, the "Predictive" side is often more valuable. Don’t just buy tools that just help you write faster. Instead, use AI to identify patterns: which customers are about to churn, which leads are actually ready to buy, and what content actually helps close deals. As Volker noted, tools that track actual consumption or customer journeys (did they stop at the pricing page?) provide infinitely better data than "clicks". Use AI to find the needle; don't just use it to make a bigger haystack."

<img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjuasQ1zkruTCYvwR2wPLGSDuthddb4CQxwTf3xTooaDGfbgHlt8GHW9LrKyps1CxzchpdT37UOui9CouTQwUKumjUJ8o31Fa9e4x9q0YZNrMqTHl64OfKWLi1wh3kgxyR5NZ5nsPPtKJ7l6-1jJmRxaoeuRnNcpv8AFT_SxtG5pAcRGFzz_GOyv-Io7ztI/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/CRMKonvo%20%23302%20-%20effective%20marketing%20in%20the%20times%20of%20AI.png' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="agentic ai"/>
    <category term="ai"/>
    <category term="ai agents"/>
    <category term="crmkonvos"/>
    <category term="generative ai"/>
    <category term="marketing"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The AI Content Trap: Multiplying Mediocrity at Scale - by @twieberneit]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-03:ccfbde149e0268b3ed046be7174adc5e</id>
    <updated>2026-05-03T18:44:35-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Google Cloud, AWS, Microsoft Azure: The AI vertical integration race - by @ldignan]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSM02W" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/04/screenshot_2026-04-29_162923.png.webp?itok=ibZcho3z" rel="enclosure" type="image/webp"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/04/screenshot_2026-04-29_162923.png.webp?itok=ibZcho3z" /><br/> "Lock-in shifts from compute, storage and databases to models, agents, vector stores, data catalogs and workflow automation. Exiting a cloud isn't easy and exiting an AI platform will be harder.
As hyperscalers control each layer they'll have more monetization opportunities and pricing power. You may get bundle economics today and pay for hyperscalers' margin expansion later via consumption models and potential orchestration charges.
Data gravity is AI gravity. Once your agents are grounded in one cloud you'll likely stay. Cloud providers are vertically integrating across the entire stack and that means you'll be more dependent on them at every level. "

<img src='https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/04/screenshot_2026-04-29_162923.png.webp?itok=ibZcho3z' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="article"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Google Cloud, AWS, Microsoft Azure: The AI vertical integration race - by @ldignan]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-03:ab16c4138b0263bad75cdcadba6b160b</id>
    <updated>2026-05-03T18:44:35-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[MCP command execution flaw: what security teams need to know - by @louiscolumbus]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSM02V" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/5zcdzz8S6R9xMQCRiaArOG/1290a9dbaee30dd37a47fefa5b656922/ANTHROPIC.png?w=800&amp;q=75" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/5zcdzz8S6R9xMQCRiaArOG/1290a9dbaee30dd37a47fefa5b656922/ANTHROPIC.png?w=800&q=75" /><br/> "OX Security confirmed arbitrary command execution on six live platforms and estimates 200,000 MCP servers are exposed. Here's how to audit your deployments."

<img src='https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/5zcdzz8S6R9xMQCRiaArOG/1290a9dbaee30dd37a47fefa5b656922/ANTHROPIC.png?w=800&q=75' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="article"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[MCP command execution flaw: what security teams need to know - by @louiscolumbus]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-03:f6de9eed628378fe2fda3eadbb7c263b</id>
    <updated>2026-05-03T18:44:34-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Enterprise Month in Review podcast - event detox and AI agent reality check edition - with @jonerp + @brianssommer]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSM02L" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://d2bwo9zemjwxh5.cloudfront.net/image-logo/720012/jonitunesart_1200x628.jpg?s=0c185a42238b569335c22580126becd1&amp;e=jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://pbcdn1.podbean.com/imglogo/image-logo/720012/jonitunesart.jpg" /><br/> Enterprise Month in Review - event detox and AI agent reality check edition

https://ift.tt/mkMzHwE

About ready for an event detox? Need a break from agentic keynote overdose? Join us for our picks and pans of the month, and perhaps a surprise guest or two, as we valiantly push to break through the noise and boil down our top road lessons. As always, Brian's infamous slide deck will be on display. Bring your savviest and snarkiest commentary... Note: this is the audio-optimized version... To see the full slides, check the youtube video replay: https://youtube.com/live/ga5DGxy74sA. 

via Busting the omnichannel - enterprise hacks and chats https://ift.tt/rvbX6pz

May 3, 2026 at 03:48PM

<img src='https://d2bwo9zemjwxh5.cloudfront.net/image-logo/720012/jonitunesart_1200x628.jpg?s=0c185a42238b569335c22580126becd1&e=jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="article"/>
    <category term=" IFTTT "/>
    <category term=" Busting the omnichannel - enterprise hacks and chats "/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Enterprise Month in Review podcast - event detox and AI agent reality check edition - with @jonerp + @brianssommer]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-03:b91abb8751f24583370190844afe366d</id>
    <updated>2026-05-03T18:31:15-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The Inadequacy of Enterprise AI Committees and Centers of Excellence - by @esimoudis]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSLzrN" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://corporate-innovation.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/AI-Stakeholder-Squeeze-Graphic.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://i0.wp.com/corporate-innovation.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/AI-Stakeholder-Squeeze-Graphic.jpg?fit=960%2C540&ssl=1" /><br/> "Institutional Knowledge Gaps. The AI committee members rarely understand the corporation’s operating model. They are often disconnected from the strategic bottlenecks present in that model. Moreover, the technical fluency that their members frequently lack obstructs their ability to determine which bottlenecks to alleviate with AI. AI technology providers are admitting that their products’ capabilities outpace the abilities of corporations to understand and implement them.
CoEs face the opposite deficit. While their staff may understand the intricacies of generative AI, they lack the deep domain expertise and tacit knowledge of the business workflows they are trying to automate and the associated organizational structures that should be modified. As a result, the enterprise defaults to pilots that fail to deliver structural transformation."

<img src='https://corporate-innovation.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/AI-Stakeholder-Squeeze-Graphic.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="article"/>
    <category term=" uncategorized "/>
    <category term=" ai ceo squeeze "/>
    <category term=" ai employee squeeze "/>
    <category term=" ai stakeholder squeeze "/>
    <category term=" ai strategy "/>
    <category term=" enterprise ai "/>
    <category term=" general-purpose technology "/>
    <category term=" generative ai "/>
    <category term=" gpt "/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The Inadequacy of Enterprise AI Committees and Centers of Excellence - by @esimoudis]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-03:ff4c39d43d89b089526662bd59114d68</id>
    <updated>2026-05-03T18:31:14-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The Orchestration Layer in Enterprise AI Just Got Named. It Has a Gemini Logo on It. - by @twieberneit]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSLzrD" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiX3eV07OQQmrujASRUD95_fL7Mx1BkGMM9gEzNf6ayMqu1dcZcY2vqwNVjBr1wTRxk7yNpcffcBCR_-WM4-SHKZA3ic22rkPBybxq5XlXtI99355r5FWC0HesRHFag7XvFnLuuX_BWSYkqcQ5wmY38dezfRwPEjTrPVqzw99veASUP80fWijz-uevhMnal/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/Gemini_Generated_Image_2jlsl62jlsl62jls.png" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiX3eV07OQQmrujASRUD95_fL7Mx1BkGMM9gEzNf6ayMqu1dcZcY2vqwNVjBr1wTRxk7yNpcffcBCR_-WM4-SHKZA3ic22rkPBybxq5XlXtI99355r5FWC0HesRHFag7XvFnLuuX_BWSYkqcQ5wmY38dezfRwPEjTrPVqzw99veASUP80fWijz-uevhMnal/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/Gemini_Generated_Image_2jlsl62jlsl62jls.png" /><br/> "Five of the seven enterprise titans I track walked into Las Vegas and announced expanded partnerships that all rest on the same architecture: Gemini Enterprise as the agent control plane, with the titan's product playing the role of premium ingredient. Salesforce. SAP. ServiceNow. Oracle. Adobe. Add Workday and Palantir Technologies to the picture, both adjacent to my titan list but visibly aligned in the same direction."

<img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiX3eV07OQQmrujASRUD95_fL7Mx1BkGMM9gEzNf6ayMqu1dcZcY2vqwNVjBr1wTRxk7yNpcffcBCR_-WM4-SHKZA3ic22rkPBybxq5XlXtI99355r5FWC0HesRHFag7XvFnLuuX_BWSYkqcQ5wmY38dezfRwPEjTrPVqzw99veASUP80fWijz-uevhMnal/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/Gemini_Generated_Image_2jlsl62jlsl62jls.png' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="link"/>
    <category term=" adobe "/>
    <category term=" google "/>
    <category term=" google gemini "/>
    <category term=" microsoft "/>
    <category term=" oracle "/>
    <category term=" palantir "/>
    <category term=" salesforce "/>
    <category term=" sap "/>
    <category term=" servicenow "/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The Orchestration Layer in Enterprise AI Just Got Named. It Has a Gemini Logo on It. - by @twieberneit]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-03:65fd54917bb42bc1efa9fc4a6f14fe85</id>
    <updated>2026-05-03T15:08:35-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Cloud & AI Spending Surge: What AWS, Azure, and Google’s Earnings Really Signal - via @UpperEdge]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSLwVT" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://upperedge.com/wp-content/uploads/bad_cloud_business_habits_twitter.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://upperedge.com/wp-content/uploads/bad_cloud_business_habits_twitter.jpg" /><br/> "The latest earnings calls confirm that cloud and AI are now fully intertwined. Growth across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud is being driven by a combination of enterprise migration and AI-related demand.

For cloud customers, the key takeaway is not just that spending is increasing. It is how that spending is being structured. Providers are using AI and infrastructure investment to support larger, longer-term commitments.

Navigating this environment requires disciplined sourcing practices, clear internal alignment, and a strong understanding of how vendor incentives are structured."

<img src='https://upperedge.com/wp-content/uploads/bad_cloud_business_habits_twitter.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="article"/>
    <category term=" cloud "/>
    <category term=" artificial intelligence "/>
    <category term=" aws "/>
    <category term=" cloud computing "/>
    <category term=" cloud cost optimization "/>
    <category term=" cloud economics "/>
    <category term=" cloud sourcing "/>
    <category term=" cloud spend "/>
    <category term=" cloud strategy "/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Cloud & AI Spending Surge: What AWS, Azure, and Google’s Earnings Really Signal - via @UpperEdge]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-03:fe5f39a70f2a9f508e1045df35219a64</id>
    <updated>2026-05-03T15:08:35-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Claude Mythos Has Found 271 Zero-Days in Firefox]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSLwVS" rel="alternate"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA["They’re right. Assuming the defenders can patch, and push those patches out to users quickly, this technology favors the defenders."]]></content>
    <category term="article"/>
    <category term=" uncategorized "/>
    <category term=" ai "/>
    <category term=" firefox "/>
    <category term=" zero-day "/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Claude Mythos Has Found 271 Zero-Days in Firefox]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-05-03:e6178876737b5cb7771e070e761c96f0</id>
    <updated>2026-05-03T15:08:35-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Enterprise hits and misses - Google makes its agentic control play AI vendor lock-in data is in and event season hits peak frenzy - by @jonerp]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSLwTy" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://diginomica.com/sites/default/files/images/2017-03/disappointed-man.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://diginomica.com/sites/default/files/images/2017-03/disappointed-man.jpg" /><br/> Enterprise hits and misses - Google makes its agentic control play, AI vendor lock-in data is in, and event season hits peak frenzy

https://ift.tt/uUyl4NP

This week - some crucial enterprise shows hit the stage (hard). Google made its enterprise orchestration play clear, but what are we learning about AI vendor lock-in? AI security is the always-looming undercard, but is the context layer the real preoccupation? 

via Jon Reed – diginomica https://diginomica.com

April 27, 2026 at 07:45PM

<img src='https://diginomica.com/sites/default/files/images/2017-03/disappointed-man.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="article"/>
    <category term=" IFTTT "/>
    <category term=" Jon Reed – diginomica "/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Enterprise hits and misses - Google makes its agentic control play AI vendor lock-in data is in and event season hits peak frenzy - by @jonerp]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-04-27:809728c5149af460ab8a8f4801060642</id>
    <updated>2026-04-27T01:13:20-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[How Verizon manages AI agent sprawl - by @ldignan]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSFBMg" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/04/screenshot_2026-04-22_193017.png.webp?itok=sEy8_SkG" rel="enclosure" type="image/webp"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/04/screenshot_2026-04-22_193017.png.webp?itok=sEy8_SkG" /><br/> "Graduate bottoms-up agents to the broader enterprise. If an agent solves a problem across many employees and departments, you standardize it, add more governance and publish it on a central platform.

Monitor ongoing agent usage due to costs and decommission low-ROI or unused agents on a regular basis. Don’t be shy about culling the AI agent herd. Managing agent sprawl comes down to creating it and then paring back repeatedly."

<img src='https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/04/screenshot_2026-04-22_193017.png.webp?itok=sEy8_SkG' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="article"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[How Verizon manages AI agent sprawl - by @ldignan]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-04-27:2293d06e9b0a41a6c04ddd01e23104da</id>
    <updated>2026-04-27T01:13:17-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[SAAS: A Prescription for Success - by Lora Cecere #scm]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TSFBLb" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://www.supplychainshaman.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/shutterstock_2728742493.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.supplychainshaman.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/shutterstock_2728742493.jpg" /><br/> "The limiting factor in supply chain planning deployment is usually domain expertise and clarity on the planning mission to drive value. Despite the rise of technology to make do-it-yourself modeling easier, side-step the do-it-yourself option and build a relationship with the technology provider. I look forward to seeing your comments."

<img src='https://www.supplychainshaman.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/shutterstock_2728742493.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="article"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[SAAS: A Prescription for Success - by Lora Cecere #scm]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
</feed>
