<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dlvrit="http://feeds.dlvr.it/atom">
  <title>Jon Reed enterprise newsfeed</title>
  <link href="http://feeds.dlvr.it/ac6861e9e2d249fc92b2895b5ff7a2e0.xml" rel="self"/>
  <id>tag:dlvr.it,2018-03-23:ac6861e9e2d249fc92b2895b5ff7a2e0</id>
  <updated>2026-08-30T21:47:25-07:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name><![CDATA[Jon Reed enterprise newsfeed]]></name>
  </author>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-30:3a78926971db55307cdff6d16d83e172</id>
    <updated>2026-08-30T21:47:25-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Quantum computing: Where we stand in 2026 - by @ldignan]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TVFRPP" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/08/screenshot_2026-08-11_141610.png.webp?itok=UTPIjC2Q" rel="enclosure" type="image/webp"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/08/screenshot_2026-08-11_141610.png.webp?itok=UTPIjC2Q" /><br/>"Full stack platforms are replacing processor-driven themes. Companies are looking to build quantum ecosystems.
Commercialization is progressing but it is uneven. Quantum computing revenue depends on government customers and experimentation in key industries with defined use cases.
Sovereign quantum computing is seen as critical and vendors are looking at supply chain control and manufacturing as strategic assets.
Applications are focused on optimization and scientific workloads.
Hybrid deployments combining quantum computing, AI and supercomputing are emerging. "

<img src='https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/08/screenshot_2026-08-11_141610.png.webp?itok=UTPIjC2Q' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Quantum computing: Where we stand in 2026 - by @ldignan]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-30:59f71e2fe576d73ef8899f229583c07c</id>
    <updated>2026-08-30T21:47:25-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The Enterprise Capital Gate: Bringing venture discipline to the enterprise AI portfolio (Part 1)]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TVFRPL" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://i0.wp.com/corporate-innovation.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/horizon_stage_gate_grid_header-e1787771489643.png?fit=2684%2C1156&amp;ssl=1" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://i0.wp.com/corporate-innovation.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/horizon_stage_gate_grid_header-e1787771489643.png?fit=2684%2C1156&ssl=1" /><br/>"Across all six risk types, the enterprise must constantly ask whether each AI project is developing a durable asset or renting a capability that will be commoditized within a short period. Both answers can justify funding. However, they justify different amounts, on different terms, with different expectations of permanence. The distinction between investing to acquire capability and renting capability belongs on the business case record."

<img src='https://i0.wp.com/corporate-innovation.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/horizon_stage_gate_grid_header-e1787771489643.png?fit=2684%2C1156&ssl=1' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="ai stakeholder squeeze"/>
    <category term="ai dashboard"/>
    <category term="ai gps"/>
    <category term="ai journey"/>
    <category term="ai strategy"/>
    <category term="enterprise ai"/>
    <category term="enterprise capital gate"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The Enterprise Capital Gate: Bringing venture discipline to the enterprise AI portfolio (Part 1)]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-30:4644bace65b47ebc7fb731ed5f56b508</id>
    <updated>2026-08-30T21:47:25-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The State of the SI Market in 2026: AI Bookings, Fixed-Price Shifts, and ERP Delivery Gaps - via @UpperEdge]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TVFRPJ" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://upperedge.com/wp-content/uploads/Shutterstock_1556915846-3.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://upperedge.com/wp-content/uploads/Shutterstock_1556915846-3.jpg" /><br/>"Palantir is increasingly positioning itself in this space through its Foundry platform, which layers an AI-enabled ontology over existing ERP investments rather than replacing them. Its partnership with Accenture and Deloitte frames this explicitly as a way for organizations to “reimagine work and infuse AI while rationalizing existing technology”, without waiting for a full ERP go-live. It’s a legitimately different value proposition, and one that more ERP program sponsors are asking about. Data remediation is becoming the longest pole in the tent on ERP transformations, and it rarely gets the program budget it deserves at the outset. "

<img src='https://upperedge.com/wp-content/uploads/Shutterstock_1556915846-3.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="system integrators"/>
    <category term="ai consulting"/>
    <category term="erp"/>
    <category term="fixed-price contracts"/>
    <category term="procurement"/>
    <category term="systems integration"/>
    <category term="transformation"/>
    <category term="vendor management"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The State of the SI Market in 2026: AI Bookings, Fixed-Price Shifts, and ERP Delivery Gaps - via @UpperEdge]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-30:638177dae974e5ba4d5c9ca437b6607f</id>
    <updated>2026-08-30T21:47:24-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Navigating Supply Chain Economic Downturns]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TVFRNv" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://www.supplychainshaman.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/shutterstock_2618841885.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.supplychainshaman.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/shutterstock_2618841885.jpg" /><br/>"In discussions with supply chain leaders, most believe that the global stock market is overheated with AI spending. Just as we have forgotten the lessons of the pandemic, few leaders remember the political drama of large stock market drops on the supply chain.

Supply chain architectures aren’t built to plan easily when there are knowns and unknowns. The traditional focus is optimization of known inputs to known outputs. One of the best sources of demand data comes from transportation reporting. Here are some current trends.

Ships sitting in the Strait of Hormuz tie up global capacity. The rise of global shipping volumes amid geopolitical friction—especially in Asia—has created trade imbalances. Ocean shipping reliability now hovers around 60-65%, down from pre-pandemic norms of 70-80%. Roughly 8% of global ocean container ship capacity is now unavailable due to shipping inefficiencies. As inefficiencies rise, costs escalate and lead times are more variable. Ocean container equipment could easily become a constraint. "

<img src='https://www.supplychainshaman.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/shutterstock_2618841885.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Navigating Supply Chain Economic Downturns]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-30:5a156be58aaf253186c4d3493f67b5ff</id>
    <updated>2026-08-30T17:42:44-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The Enterprise AI Intent Gap - video event summary from @twieberneit]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TVFMp8" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJJOvDrsLMv1oueLp8KDcZQbrZoZjmG3tvo3vZ0Og3jjWKTndMxdSUtQH7NbgysRjGX9Bs8wzefDVcZg6yJhCW0m1xdTnENVPJTo7F5K-1ezYeWpiWlJ1cp6rWbgZmElQZGWSdPQMjUGYzk9RJx8hlHM8z1juu2yUPlNjE-m60gQko0YVu6aYZYcWaU437/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/CRMKonvo%20%23314.png" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJJOvDrsLMv1oueLp8KDcZQbrZoZjmG3tvo3vZ0Og3jjWKTndMxdSUtQH7NbgysRjGX9Bs8wzefDVcZg6yJhCW0m1xdTnENVPJTo7F5K-1ezYeWpiWlJ1cp6rWbgZmElQZGWSdPQMjUGYzk9RJx8hlHM8z1juu2yUPlNjE-m60gQko0YVu6aYZYcWaU437/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/CRMKonvo%20%23314.png" /><br/>"Jon opened with numbers rather than opinion, a habit more of us should copy. McKinsey's recent work on AI measurement found that nearly eight in ten companies are using generative AI in some capacity, while around sixty percent report not seeing enterprise-wide EBIT impact from those programs. The gap between activity and impact is apparently not closing. Instead, it seems to be widening. A small group of over-performers is automating end-to-end workflows inside specific domains and getting results, and even they argue about what to measure and how to attribute the improvement."

<img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJJOvDrsLMv1oueLp8KDcZQbrZoZjmG3tvo3vZ0Og3jjWKTndMxdSUtQH7NbgysRjGX9Bs8wzefDVcZg6yJhCW0m1xdTnENVPJTo7F5K-1ezYeWpiWlJ1cp6rWbgZmElQZGWSdPQMjUGYzk9RJx8hlHM8z1juu2yUPlNjE-m60gQko0YVu6aYZYcWaU437/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/CRMKonvo%20%23314.png' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="agentic ai"/>
    <category term="ai"/>
    <category term="crmkonvos"/>
    <category term="enterprise software"/>
    <category term="strategy"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The Enterprise AI Intent Gap - video event summary from @twieberneit]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-30:de9d0c6758068abb666a6870ae1bcd52</id>
    <updated>2026-08-30T17:42:44-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The Inference Paradox: Tokens Got 1,000x Cheaper and Your AI Bill Went Up - by @twieberneit]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TVFMp7" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5RBgX7Bz_vVAuVKy7AZiBHQzLsQL1_hdHLZc-vuWryxXd7YAw5q8sPkXvOOM18t8-pN_g2swx75cOa8n0-qbEjMK01lUNXs0L67xeMYJEgvfN4UAU7csDrKQN1kROrlDovs0R67h-E5PRy0Wt9ipZ_1JvdC2vK4iAN4W7x5NFa395lZhspyPtDnCXnXXE/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/image.png" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5RBgX7Bz_vVAuVKy7AZiBHQzLsQL1_hdHLZc-vuWryxXd7YAw5q8sPkXvOOM18t8-pN_g2swx75cOa8n0-qbEjMK01lUNXs0L67xeMYJEgvfN4UAU7csDrKQN1kROrlDovs0R67h-E5PRy0Wt9ipZ_1JvdC2vK4iAN4W7x5NFa395lZhspyPtDnCXnXXE/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/image.png" /><br/>"Fu and colleagues gave the effect a name in Not All Tokens Are Equal: token inflation, the gap between advertised per-token pricing and what a workflow actually consumes once it retries what it got wrong. They measure inflation as high as 4.25x on multi-hop question answering, and they show that FrugalGPT, one of the standard cost-aware routers, underestimates true expense by more than 2x on hard tasks. This mechanism is what both drives the cost and nobody prices in: a failed reasoning chain is not only a wasted call, it is a call that gets re-sent in full, with history attached, to a more expensive model."

<img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5RBgX7Bz_vVAuVKy7AZiBHQzLsQL1_hdHLZc-vuWryxXd7YAw5q8sPkXvOOM18t8-pN_g2swx75cOa8n0-qbEjMK01lUNXs0L67xeMYJEgvfN4UAU7csDrKQN1kROrlDovs0R67h-E5PRy0Wt9ipZ_1JvdC2vK4iAN4W7x5NFa395lZhspyPtDnCXnXXE/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/image.png' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="agentic ai"/>
    <category term="ai"/>
    <category term="ai agents"/>
    <category term="customer experience"/>
    <category term="strategy"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The Inference Paradox: Tokens Got 1,000x Cheaper and Your AI Bill Went Up - by @twieberneit]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-30:d4b7fde7a10d369b761eefd8e2d903ff</id>
    <updated>2026-08-30T17:42:44-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Prompt injection ranks No. 1 with OWASP and No. 12 in the incident record. The attack itself is invisible to a scan. by @louiscolumbus]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TVFMp6" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/HPZWmJGCkFIILgX7mVWDd/a1ba5a671795cfb8e15b46185ba9b36c/HERO.png?w=800&amp;q=75" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/HPZWmJGCkFIILgX7mVWDd/a1ba5a671795cfb8e15b46185ba9b36c/HERO.png?w=800&q=75" /><br/>"Prompt injection is OWASP's No. 1 LLM risk, but ranks No. 12 in 6,639 real incidents — an independent analysis finds no statistically detectable agreement."

<img src='https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/HPZWmJGCkFIILgX7mVWDd/a1ba5a671795cfb8e15b46185ba9b36c/HERO.png?w=800&q=75' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Prompt injection ranks No. 1 with OWASP and No. 12 in the incident record. The attack itself is invisible to a scan. by @louiscolumbus]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-30:6e1d67db995a2b82ee70b5b46531e614</id>
    <updated>2026-08-30T17:42:44-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The AI Proposal Trap: How to Evaluate SI Proposals When Vendors Optimize for Machines - via @UpperEdge]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TVFMp0" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://upperedge.com/wp-content/uploads/Picture2-1.png" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://upperedge.com/wp-content/uploads/Picture2-1.png" /><br/>"I recently encountered the same problem in a different form while reviewing an implementation SOW. The client had specifically requested contractual “off-ramps” because it wanted the ability to exit the engagement at defined points if the program was not working. When I asked an LLM to perform a general review of the agreement, it highlighted the off-ramps as a significant advantage for the client and characterized them as providing meaningful flexibility. On the surface, that conclusion made sense. Off-ramps sound client-friendly.

The problem appeared when we examined how the provisions actually worked. The conditions surrounding the off-ramps made them extremely difficult to exercise in practice. More importantly, the provisions needed to be evaluated against the broader termination rights a client would ordinarily expect in a major engagement, including termination-for-convenience rights that had effectively been constrained by the structure."

<img src='https://upperedge.com/wp-content/uploads/Picture2-1.png' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="artificial intelligence"/>
    <category term="ai proposal analysis"/>
    <category term="ai proposal evaluation"/>
    <category term="evaluating ai-enhanced proposals"/>
    <category term="llm vendor evaluation"/>
    <category term="procurement ai bias"/>
    <category term="rfp response evaluation"/>
    <category term="si proposal evaluation"/>
    <category term="systems integrator contracts"/>
    <category term="vendor proposal optimization"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The AI Proposal Trap: How to Evaluate SI Proposals When Vendors Optimize for Machines - via @UpperEdge]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-30:a8ae49077cf0cf169bab411ff2ce4227</id>
    <updated>2026-08-30T16:35:08-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Enterprise Month in Review - fall event survival - BS Detector special - video replay with @jonerp + @brianssommer]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TVFLtX" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/McdDj1G9ZUU/hqdefault.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://i.ytimg.com/vi/McdDj1G9ZUU/hqdefault.jpg?v=6a8f370f&sqp=CIj0vNQG-oaymwEPCOADEOgC8quKqQMDwAIB&rs=AOn4CLAiv3WB-L4Nt7yx4Fn_17ioYDRKvQ" /><br/>"Yep, the silly season is upon us.... time to polish thos BS detectors! Get ready to decode over-the-top AI keynote messaging. Brian and Jon have your survival guide ready! Each will reveal the questions customers should be pressing, and how to get the most insights with the least event friction! We'll also be picking our top underrated stories of the month. As usual, Brian will have his infamous slide deck - bring your savviest and snarkiest commentary. We may even bring a surprise guest on cam, to help us all get ready for what pitfalls lie ahead..."

<img src='https://i.ytimg.com/vi/McdDj1G9ZUU/hqdefault.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Enterprise Month in Review - fall event survival - BS Detector special - video replay with @jonerp + @brianssommer]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-30:737ea559a745357c1f9277994572fd93</id>
    <updated>2026-08-30T16:35:07-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[AI Doesn’t Mean the End of Mathematics—at Least Not Yet]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TVFLtW" rel="alternate"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://rdl.ink/render/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.schneier.com%2Fblog%2Farchives%2F2026%2F08%2Fai-doesnt-mean-the-end-of-mathematics-at-least-not-yet.html" /><br/>"This speaks to a more general limitation of current AI systems. They are creative in the sense that they can recombine existing ideas in novel ways. But they are not creative in others: they have not yet developed conceptually new theories or structures. And while they have larger working memories than humans do, know more about more different things than any particular human does, and can process information faster than humans, can, true novelty is still largely beyond their reach."]]></content>
    <category term="uncategorized"/>
    <category term="ai"/>
    <category term="llm"/>
    <category term="mathematics"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[AI Doesn’t Mean the End of Mathematics—at Least Not Yet]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-30:314f4e7d8ec0c916c4b42c8f6e735f2d</id>
    <updated>2026-08-30T16:35:07-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Enterprise hits and misses - agents need meaning not just data. Anthropic grapples with model pricing and retailers get an economic gut check. - by @jonerp]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TVFLtK" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://diginomica.com/sites/default/files/images/2018-12/award-winner.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://diginomica.com/sites/default/files/images/2018-12/award-winner.jpg" /><br/>Enterprise hits and misses - agents need meaning, not just data. Anthropic grapples with model pricing, and retailers get an economic gut check. 

https://ift.tt/b9E2wM1

This week - agents need meaning - and proper, contained actions. But how do we get there? Anthropic gets a taste of frontier model pricing backlash, and retailers run into macro-economic crosswinds. Oh, and the best enterprise phrase of the year is coined. Your whiffs are here, and so am I.

via Jon Reed – diginomica https://diginomica.com

August 24, 2026 at 03:16AM

<img src='https://diginomica.com/sites/default/files/images/2018-12/award-winner.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="IFTTT"/>
    <category term="Jon Reed – diginomica"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Enterprise hits and misses - agents need meaning not just data. Anthropic grapples with model pricing and retailers get an economic gut check. - by @jonerp]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-23:80c9c19321066d138e59d76d80ff3dca</id>
    <updated>2026-08-23T16:57:03-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The Artifact is Free, Assurance is the Product - via @RedMonk]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TV82F2" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="http://redmonk.com/kholterhoff/files/2026/08/San_Francisco_International_Airport_-_April_2018_0465-scaled.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="http://redmonk.com/kholterhoff/files/2026/08/San_Francisco_International_Airport_-_April_2018_0465-scaled.jpg" /><br/>"In the first post in this series, Modern Software Registries are a Trust Service,  I traced how npm, PyPI, RubyGems, crates.io, and NuGet all converged on the same response to a year of supply chain attacks, issuing short-lived credentials tied to verified build pipelines rather than trusting long-lived tokens sitting in CI. My conclusion there was that registries are becoming policy engines as much as distribution systems.

This post is about what happens when somebody works out how to charge for that. My argument begins by looking at hardened container images, where the trust-service model is furthest along. I then trace the same model in extension registries, where the Eclipse Foundation now sells an SLA on Open VSX and Microsoft’s Visual Studio Marketplace restricts extension use to Microsoft products. I argue the pattern across these markets is the same: the artifact is free, assurance is the product."

<img src='http://redmonk.com/kholterhoff/files/2026/08/San_Francisco_International_Airport_-_April_2018_0465-scaled.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="ai"/>
    <category term="security"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The Artifact is Free, Assurance is the Product - via @RedMonk]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-23:c498af93689c59c328cdf90a663e18bc</id>
    <updated>2026-08-23T16:57:02-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The birth of Data Inc.? - by @ldignan]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TV82F0" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/08/screenshot_2026-08-19_155013.png.webp?itok=h5KLoRh6" rel="enclosure" type="image/webp"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/08/screenshot_2026-08-19_155013.png.webp?itok=h5KLoRh6" /><br/>"Enterprises won't sell their data because it's their competitive advantage--or so they think. The common thinking is that every enterprise will leverage its own data to train open models for agentic AI. Now data is the business moat, but it's highly likely that there will be enterprises that don't have the talent, skills or business acumen to leverage their own datasets. For now, companies are trying to follow the Data Inc. approach, which was outlined in 2023 by Constellation Research CEO R "Ray" Wang. "

<img src='https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/08/screenshot_2026-08-19_155013.png.webp?itok=h5KLoRh6' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The birth of Data Inc.? - by @ldignan]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-23:7e65a7e52ef520d90c516b2f00af7233</id>
    <updated>2026-08-23T15:49:33-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Executive Intelligence @diginomica podcast - can we build an agentic system of work? Oracle's Chris Leone on the real potential of enterprise AI - with @jonerp]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TV81GX" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="http://assets.libsyn.com/show/590850?height=250&amp;width=250&amp;overlay=true" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="http://assets.libsyn.com/show/590850?height=250&width=250&overlay=true" /><br/>"Enterprise AI is in the pressure cooker: questionable results on the one hand, rising token costs on the other. But enterprise vendors like Oracle are pressing hard down a different path to value - one that reduces model costs and breaks away from frontier model hype. Can Oracle build a "system of outcomes"? And, speaking of building, can customers and partners build on Oracle's SaaS and AI foundations? In our latest Executive Intelligence podcast, Jon Reed airs out his concerns on enterprise AI, and Leone makes his case."

<img src='http://assets.libsyn.com/show/590850?height=250&width=250&overlay=true' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Executive Intelligence @diginomica podcast - can we build an agentic system of work? Oracle's Chris Leone on the real potential of enterprise AI - with @jonerp]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-23:3265cb61594c410cb5f62c9437f3da49</id>
    <updated>2026-08-23T15:49:32-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Why AI Needs a "Genie Coefficient"]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TV81GV" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/cartoon-digital-genie-emerging-from-a-smartphone-towering-over-a-surprised-user.png?id=67508222&amp;width=1200&amp;height=600&amp;coordinates=0%2C166%2C0%2C167" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/cartoon-digital-genie-emerging-from-a-smartphone-towering-over-a-surprised-user.png?id=67508222&width=1200&height=600&coordinates=0%2C166%2C0%2C167" /><br/>"AI researcher Simon Willison spent two days with Anthropic’s Fable AI, and called it “relentlessly proactive.” For example, he asked it to track down a stray scroll bar in a web app. He came back to find it had opened browsers, written its own screenshot tooling, created its own page to re-create the bug, and stood up a local web server to collect measurements. It found the bug and, along the way, did many surprising things he never asked it to do. And we are seeing similar behavior with all recent AI models when combined with flexible harnesses.

This kind of behavior could easily go off the rails. Tell an AI agent to book you a flight and, finding the airline’s site says sold out, it might break into the booking database and force a reservation. Ask it to schedule a meeting and it might snoop your password to access your calendar. Tell it to save money on your phone plan and it might cancel the plan outright, or scam someone else into paying the bill."

<img src='https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/cartoon-digital-genie-emerging-from-a-smartphone-towering-over-a-surprised-user.png?id=67508222&width=1200&height=600&coordinates=0%2C166%2C0%2C167' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Why AI Needs a "Genie Coefficient"]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-23:35b22c7c5372f860c7221acdb91fdcb1</id>
    <updated>2026-08-23T15:49:32-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[How to Evaluate Transformation Leaders for AI-Enabled Projects: Why Experience Alone Predicts Nothing - via @UpperEdge]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TV81GR" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://upperedge.com/wp-content/uploads/Shutterstock_2383265651.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://upperedge.com/wp-content/uploads/Shutterstock_2383265651.jpg" /><br/>"The concern that AI could weaken the next generation of professional expertise is real, but the outcome is not predetermined. If firms simply automate the work and allow the developmental experiences to disappear, the experience base may decline. If they treat AI as a way to manufacture realistic experience, compress learning cycles, and test judgment before people are placed into roles where clients bear the consequences, the opposite may happen. We may end up developing strong professionals faster than we ever have before."

<img src='https://upperedge.com/wp-content/uploads/Shutterstock_2383265651.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="artificial intelligence"/>
    <category term="digital transformation"/>
    <category term="ai-enabled erp"/>
    <category term="ai-enabled transformations"/>
    <category term="judgment development"/>
    <category term="program management"/>
    <category term="si capability assessment"/>
    <category term="si procurement"/>
    <category term="system integrator evaluation"/>
    <category term="transformation leadership"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[How to Evaluate Transformation Leaders for AI-Enabled Projects: Why Experience Alone Predicts Nothing - via @UpperEdge]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-23:392b9b7c2e43ca596ae2bd6194ad3393</id>
    <updated>2026-08-23T13:48:18-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Agent identity is solved. Containment isn't - by @louiscolumbus]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TV7zNp" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/5n5rmnYkbIGSFc4nayFtGc/e24edab926693c1f72335107e86c0c2c/hero.png?w=800&amp;q=75" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/5n5rmnYkbIGSFc4nayFtGc/e24edab926693c1f72335107e86c0c2c/hero.png?w=800&q=75" /><br/>"Four of five enterprises that secured AI agent identities never built isolation to contain a compromised agent, VentureBeat's July Pulse survey found."

<img src='https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/5n5rmnYkbIGSFc4nayFtGc/e24edab926693c1f72335107e86c0c2c/hero.png?w=800&q=75' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Agent identity is solved. Containment isn't - by @louiscolumbus]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-23:0e6113d163a9a98d78a11e6123eb6c77</id>
    <updated>2026-08-23T13:48:18-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The Customer Journey Illusion: Stop Mapping and Start Enabling - by @twieberneit]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TV7zNn" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjz5rhB9xS2kn-g_YLGybU7oBlnklzivjwQeDoNVB759eGo80Rid4Vw5_-zXsaGPXRxjcxiOUEt9HXGfd6S18C_9FBYE84_s5Lpqr4t8PXR7nQB4pK56jfaopfesNR9R9LbUKzRh3PPMiqSRQNbCKjYYOav314Sw-F4WFbrUHkrdsUaT4ctWdiu8On58KbC/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/CRMKonvos%20%23313%20Dr.%20G.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjz5rhB9xS2kn-g_YLGybU7oBlnklzivjwQeDoNVB759eGo80Rid4Vw5_-zXsaGPXRxjcxiOUEt9HXGfd6S18C_9FBYE84_s5Lpqr4t8PXR7nQB4pK56jfaopfesNR9R9LbUKzRh3PPMiqSRQNbCKjYYOav314Sw-F4WFbrUHkrdsUaT4ctWdiu8On58KbC/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/CRMKonvos%20%23313%20Dr.%20G.jpg" /><br/>"Now we enter the era of Artificial Intelligence – again. The hype is deafening. We are told that Generative AI and LLM technology will revolutionize customer service. We are told that chatbots (err, agents) connected to a RAG architecture will flawlessly guide customers through their issues. Let me be absolutely clear. If your underlying data architecture is a mess, an LLM will simply hallucinate solutions based on that mess. Using RAG to query a broken knowledge base will just give you highly confident, grammatically correct wrong answers. Best regards from Air Canada!

AI is not magic. It is a tool that accelerates whatever processes you have in place. If your process is designed to ignore five-sixths of the customer's reality, AI will just ignore them faster. True innovation in CX requires a solid architectural foundation. You need a unified data layer that provides a single, accurate view of the customer. You need integration across your entire technology stack. Your CRM must talk to your billing system. The billing system must talk to your support platform. Without this integration, your AI initiatives are doomed to fail."

<img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjz5rhB9xS2kn-g_YLGybU7oBlnklzivjwQeDoNVB759eGo80Rid4Vw5_-zXsaGPXRxjcxiOUEt9HXGfd6S18C_9FBYE84_s5Lpqr4t8PXR7nQB4pK56jfaopfesNR9R9LbUKzRh3PPMiqSRQNbCKjYYOav314Sw-F4WFbrUHkrdsUaT4ctWdiu8On58KbC/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/CRMKonvos%20%23313%20Dr.%20G.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="crmkonvos"/>
    <category term="customer experience"/>
    <category term="customer journey management"/>
    <category term="customer journey mapping"/>
    <category term="strategy"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The Customer Journey Illusion: Stop Mapping and Start Enabling - by @twieberneit]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-23:831f48bdfc87a4c74a1a55766def9e81</id>
    <updated>2026-08-23T13:48:17-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Young adults in the U.S. are increasingly wary of AI, concerned it will take jobs]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TV7zNc" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2026/08/SR_26.08.11_AI-ViewsTeens_crop.png?w=1200&amp;h=628&amp;crop=1" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2026/08/SR_26.08.11_AI-ViewsTeens_crop.png?w=1200&h=628&crop=1" /><br/>"For the first time, a majority of adults under 30 (55%) now say they’re more concerned than excited about AI. About one-in-ten say they’re more excited than concerned, and roughly a third feel both equally. Their concern is now on par with those in their 30s and 40s, and those 65 and up."

<img src='https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2026/08/SR_26.08.11_AI-ViewsTeens_crop.png?w=1200&h=628&crop=1' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Young adults in the U.S. are increasingly wary of AI, concerned it will take jobs]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-08-23:25439c64abcec0dec46ad87e6905356c</id>
    <updated>2026-08-23T12:40:48-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The Verification Era: What Happens When Code Becomes Abundant - by @vijayasankarv]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TV7y9X" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://andvijaysays.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/img_7705.png" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://andvijaysays.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/img_7705.png" /><br/>"AI-generated code often looks immaculate. It passes linting, features clean syntax, and arrives with unit tests attached. But slop debt is dangerous precisely because it is invisible—it satisfies basic automated checks while embedding subtle semantic errors or invariant violations that only emerge under operational pressure.

Even when the output is well-structured, generation scales dramatically faster than human comprehension. An agent can produce thousands of lines of implementation in minutes, but an organization still requires human judgment, domain context, and operational experience to verify that those lines correctly represent business invariants."

<img src='https://andvijaysays.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/img_7705.png' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="uncategorized"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The Verification Era: What Happens When Code Becomes Abundant - by @vijayasankarv]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
</feed>
