<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dlvrit="http://feeds.dlvr.it/atom">
  <title>Jon Reed enterprise newsfeed</title>
  <link href="http://feeds.dlvr.it/ac6861e9e2d249fc92b2895b5ff7a2e0.xml" rel="self"/>
  <id>tag:dlvr.it,2018-03-23:ac6861e9e2d249fc92b2895b5ff7a2e0</id>
  <updated>2026-07-05T13:29:22-07:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name><![CDATA[Jon Reed enterprise newsfeed]]></name>
  </author>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-07-05:c772281af10321d388bd277624f291ae</id>
    <updated>2026-07-05T13:29:22-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[AWS launches forward deployed engineering unit with $1 billion investment - by @ldignan]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTMjZP" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/06/screenshot_2026-06-30_100515.png.webp?itok=wo_edi81" rel="enclosure" type="image/webp"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/06/screenshot_2026-06-30_100515.png.webp?itok=wo_edi81" /><br/>"Constellation Research CEO R "Ray" Wang said the never-ending stream of newly minted FDEs require buyer scrutiny.

    "I'm tired of looking at fake FDEs. A real FDE understands how to take the requirement and put it back into the product and actually get something done. These aren't glorified sales consultants or sales engineers. They actually are building product at the same time as they're actually going out to solve the problems at an organization, and they're not field CTOs, and they're not architects. The true FTEs are the folks that are like the consultants from the 90s, and I'm talking like folks that were literally had like 160 to 180 IQ. They knew what they were doing. Today there's so many fake FTEs."

<img src='https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/06/screenshot_2026-06-30_100515.png.webp?itok=wo_edi81' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[AWS launches forward deployed engineering unit with $1 billion investment - by @ldignan]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-07-05:91e260be4b9c14c405ea2c1b0fb1f301</id>
    <updated>2026-07-05T13:29:21-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[If CRM Is Dead, How Is the Relationship Still Breathing? - by @lizkmiller]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTMjZN" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/07/firefly_include_blooming_flowers_around_the_headstone_827862.png.webp?itok=JhxDtnA0" rel="enclosure" type="image/webp"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/07/firefly_include_blooming_flowers_around_the_headstone_827862.png.webp?itok=JhxDtnA0" /><br/>"CRM is not dead. The strategy is alive and well for those with the willingness to build and the patience to guide it forward. The technology is alive and well for those curious enough to explore modern paths to transformation. Gone are the static systems of record, introducing growth, engagement, experience, and revenue to a more active, more contextual, and more individualized approach. Together, with AI as an accelerator and transformational supercharger, CRM can once again take its place next to the customer and shoulder to shoulder with any brand’s CX front line. "

<img src='https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/07/firefly_include_blooming_flowers_around_the_headstone_827862.png.webp?itok=JhxDtnA0' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[If CRM Is Dead, How Is the Relationship Still Breathing? - by @lizkmiller]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-07-05:f5ac7d7bdb29cdc7feaddb0ff259587d</id>
    <updated>2026-07-05T13:29:20-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Why cheaper models alone won’t save your AI budget]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTMjZM" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://cdn.thenewstack.io/media/2026/07/431c0170-tofan-teodor-kb7nbl1rnns-unsplash-scaled.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://cdn.thenewstack.io/media/2026/07/b8ccb8fc-brano-heydddq0cbe-unsplash-scaled.jpg" /><br/>"Finding the most capable model at the lowest cost has always been the goal. But as agentic AI evolves, a new problem is frustrating engineers: token consumption is becoming too high across AI systems. Every agent operation consumes tokens, but in very different ways. For instance, a moderately complex agent request can consume 20,000 to 60,000 tokens across its reasoning chain, but a nontrivial engineering task can burn 150,000 to 200,000 tokens per problem.

    Every agent operation consumes tokens, but in very different ways.

Developers are realizing that selecting the right model is important, but the bigger issue is limiting unnecessary token movement throughout an agent’s workflow. That is why teams are starting to consider how to accomplish the same tasks with fewer tokens."

<img src='https://cdn.thenewstack.io/media/2026/07/431c0170-tofan-teodor-kb7nbl1rnns-unsplash-scaled.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="ai infrastructure"/>
    <category term="emerging technologies"/>
    <category term="operations"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Why cheaper models alone won’t save your AI budget]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-07-05:0fa627a60ac9c7dfe03c17ebc3197952</id>
    <updated>2026-07-05T13:29:19-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Claude Code hijacked via Sentry — Datadog, PagerDuty at risk - by @louiscolumbus]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTMjZL" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/6di1wa5fhWEfFyVhOuFc0/d26a92a3d31716e3c020864f400459f0/hero.png?w=800&amp;q=75" rel="enclosure" type="image/png"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/6di1wa5fhWEfFyVhOuFc0/d26a92a3d31716e3c020864f400459f0/hero.png?w=800&q=75" /><br/>"Tenet Security hijacked Claude Code in 85% of tests via a fake Sentry error — no stolen credentials, no alerts. Datadog and PagerDuty are equally exposed."

<img src='https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/6di1wa5fhWEfFyVhOuFc0/d26a92a3d31716e3c020864f400459f0/hero.png?w=800&q=75' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Claude Code hijacked via Sentry — Datadog, PagerDuty at risk - by @louiscolumbus]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-07-05:6c944ab7bf28a4bd1983d879bf469d06</id>
    <updated>2026-07-05T13:29:18-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The Illusion of the AI Copilot: Why Your Legacy CRM Architecture Isn't Cutting It - by @twieberneit]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTMjZK" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgxN839cDc-FqADq3I8bhTrKGbKtH1HVFVCRxZt-KdTguHNcbtbq4m9q7b1kRICC3drTaXqL_ssk2mAuGJ_siIWfKvzVG2M349HzlGl96nVs-999MC31wpkOVZHykLBdFZC0nZmBEU0oMb3omwunloEucqj8XbKoHcqIm4pFgvPoD05wxgk3T9ACi55uFHF/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/CRMKonvo%20%23307%20-%20Clint,%20Larry%20,%20Zac.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgxN839cDc-FqADq3I8bhTrKGbKtH1HVFVCRxZt-KdTguHNcbtbq4m9q7b1kRICC3drTaXqL_ssk2mAuGJ_siIWfKvzVG2M349HzlGl96nVs-999MC31wpkOVZHykLBdFZC0nZmBEU0oMb3omwunloEucqj8XbKoHcqIm4pFgvPoD05wxgk3T9ACi55uFHF/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/CRMKonvo%20%23307%20-%20Clint,%20Larry%20,%20Zac.jpg" /><br/>"This brings us to a critical architectural distinction: the difference between merely storing data artifacts and actively maintaining an ongoing understanding of work. Traditional software applications are exceptional at storing passive artifacts: a saved document file, a logged call note, or an archived email chain. But a massive collection of independent data artifacts does not equal true institutional knowledge. Without interpretation it remains mere data. Expecting a human executive to manually synthesize thousands of scattered communication artifacts into a coherent operational picture is a guaranteed recipe for immediate corporate burnout."

<img src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgxN839cDc-FqADq3I8bhTrKGbKtH1HVFVCRxZt-KdTguHNcbtbq4m9q7b1kRICC3drTaXqL_ssk2mAuGJ_siIWfKvzVG2M349HzlGl96nVs-999MC31wpkOVZHykLBdFZC0nZmBEU0oMb3omwunloEucqj8XbKoHcqIm4pFgvPoD05wxgk3T9ACi55uFHF/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/CRMKonvo%20%23307%20-%20Clint,%20Larry%20,%20Zac.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="ai"/>
    <category term="ai agents"/>
    <category term="crmkonvos"/>
    <category term="executive intelligence"/>
    <category term="knowledge graph"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The Illusion of the AI Copilot: Why Your Legacy CRM Architecture Isn't Cutting It - by @twieberneit]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-07-05:ae31d8a108e0e658979537f6b56da59c</id>
    <updated>2026-07-05T13:29:16-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Is Your Risk Register Hiding Program Problems? How to Tell Before It’s Too Late - via @UpperEdge]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTMjYy" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://upperedge.com/wp-content/uploads/Shutterstock_2466719765-zimmer-biomet-deloitte.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://upperedge.com/wp-content/uploads/Shutterstock_2466719765-zimmer-biomet-deloitte.jpg" /><br/>"If your program struggles, who in the room is solely focused on protecting the enterprise? Not the engagement, not the methodology, not the SI relationship. The outcome and the people attached to it.

If the honest answer is no one, your register will keep telling you the program is improving, right up until the moment the program stops being recoverable. By then the dashboard will already be red, the SI will have filed the extended hypercare CR, the sponsor will be in front of the board, and the mitigation windows that existed when the register was last honest will have closed months back."

<img src='https://upperedge.com/wp-content/uploads/Shutterstock_2466719765-zimmer-biomet-deloitte.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="digital transformation"/>
    <category term="erp program management"/>
    <category term="executive sponsor"/>
    <category term="it program risk"/>
    <category term="mitigation windows"/>
    <category term="pmo"/>
    <category term="program governance"/>
    <category term="project execution advisory"/>
    <category term="quiet closure"/>
    <category term="risk management"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Is Your Risk Register Hiding Program Problems? How to Tell Before It’s Too Late - via @UpperEdge]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-07-05:3aaedc6fe64f1b37b3f2131af6bcc99d</id>
    <updated>2026-07-05T12:21:16-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The 'Tokenpocalypse' is here: Companies quietly throttle AI as token bills pile up]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTMhJs" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://s.yimg.com/lo/mysterio/api/5D7A71D916279A90F11994978660CE6FA44145801B18F52F2DC64347DD7B33C7/subgraphmysterio/resizefill_w1200_h800;quality_80;format_webp/https:%2F%2Fmedia.zenfs.com%2Fen%2Fthe_cool_down_737%2Fc5415e1f62bc3ab835978450d2ff9231" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://s.yimg.com/lo/mysterio/api/5D7A71D916279A90F11994978660CE6FA44145801B18F52F2DC64347DD7B33C7/subgraphmysterio/resizefill_w1200_h800;quality_80;format_webp/https:%2F%2Fmedia.zenfs.com%2Fen%2Fthe_cool_down_737%2Fc5415e1f62bc3ab835978450d2ff9231" /><br/>""We're seeing from some of the data internally at least that it's actually not our engineers that are driving the token consumption. It's a lot of the non-engineers that are doing some of those behaviors [...] you were talking about," Accenture's agentic AI strategy lead Justice Kwak said in the meeting, according to the leaked audio.

The pattern may not be limited to Accenture. Some providers, including GitHub, are reportedly shifting away from flat subscriptions and toward per-token pricing, while Uber is said to have capped workers' use of AI coding tools after previously urging staff to "use AI as much as possible." "

<img src='https://s.yimg.com/lo/mysterio/api/5D7A71D916279A90F11994978660CE6FA44145801B18F52F2DC64347DD7B33C7/subgraphmysterio/resizefill_w1200_h800;quality_80;format_webp/https:%2F%2Fmedia.zenfs.com%2Fen%2Fthe_cool_down_737%2Fc5415e1f62bc3ab835978450d2ff9231' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The 'Tokenpocalypse' is here: Companies quietly throttle AI as token bills pile up]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-07-05:6fea50d8cbdf5fe771dcb55b7ebcb6b7</id>
    <updated>2026-07-05T12:21:15-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Systems Over Scale: What Bridgewater Teaches Us About the Enterprise AI Plateau - by @vijaysankarv]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTMhJp" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://andvijaysays.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/391b1912-626b-4375-82b8-13667789fe44-13269-000010cf8c220246_file.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://andvijaysays.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/391b1912-626b-4375-82b8-13667789fe44-13269-000010cf8c220246_file.jpg" /><br/>"Good enterprise AI usually comes from a better feedback loop, not from more data or a bigger model.

I also think that’s why so many enterprise AI projects seem to plateau around the same accuracy range. Once you’ve exhausted prompt engineering and upgraded to the latest foundation model, the next gains usually don’t come from a smarter model. They come from better supervision, better routing, better feedback, and better systems."

<img src='https://andvijaysays.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/391b1912-626b-4375-82b8-13667789fe44-13269-000010cf8c220246_file.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="uncategorized"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Systems Over Scale: What Bridgewater Teaches Us About the Enterprise AI Plateau - by @vijaysankarv]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-07-05:1c400cd4ad844c89fc9afb4b6bd07797</id>
    <updated>2026-07-05T12:21:13-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Enterprise month in review, podcast edition - is HR tech falling short? With @jonerp, Meg Bear, Amy Wilson and @brianssommer]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTMhJm" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://d2bwo9zemjwxh5.cloudfront.net/ep-logo/pbblog720012/jonitunesart_1200x628.jpg?s=b1645779e297c242a87a02202f71ef95&amp;e=jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://pbcdn1.podbean.com/imglogo/image-logo/720012/jonitunesart.jpg" /><br/>Enterprise month in review - is HR tech falling short? With Meg Bear and Amy Wilson

https://ift.tt/UOc6Juh

Yep, it's that time again. Join Jon Reed and Brian Sommer for the Enterprise Month in Review. We'll pick our underrated stories, and then, in a classic show mashup, Amy Wilson and Meg Bear of the Meg and Amy how will give their live reactions to Brian Sommer's run-down of where HR tech, AI and leadership is falling short. We'll also have some make-your-own-buzzword surprises, and of course, Brian's infamous slide deck. As always, bring your savviest and snarkiest commentary, as you help steer the show and we field your reactions in real-time. Note: for the full slide experience, catch the YouTube replay at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWtobJAsYqE

via Busting the omnichannel - enterprise hacks and chats https://ift.tt/5y8BdFP

July 5, 2026 at 04:58AM

<img src='https://d2bwo9zemjwxh5.cloudfront.net/ep-logo/pbblog720012/jonitunesart_1200x628.jpg?s=b1645779e297c242a87a02202f71ef95&e=jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="IFTTT"/>
    <category term="Busting the omnichannel - enterprise hacks and chats"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Enterprise month in review, podcast edition - is HR tech falling short? With @jonerp, Meg Bear, Amy Wilson and @brianssommer]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-07-05:423a0ef7c677a625826e1af5383f4981</id>
    <updated>2026-07-05T12:21:09-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Enterprise hits and misses - AI context and real-time truth gets a debate Ford rehires humans and buyers weigh AI reults to date - by @jonerp]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTMhJh" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://diginomica.com/sites/default/files/images/2015-08/Fotolia-adrenalinapura-81858846_Sub_700px.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://diginomica.com/sites/default/files/images/2015-08/Fotolia-adrenalinapura-81858846_Sub_700px.jpg" /><br/>Enterprise hits and misses - AI context and real-time truth gets a debate, Ford rehires humans, and buyers weigh AI reults to date

https://ift.tt/qpYNZhs

This week - my real-time organizational truth piece evokes AI context debates - is there project success beyond frontier model dependence? Ford rehires human engineers - but it's complicated. OpenAI volunteers for regulation (kind of), and buyers get real on AI. 

via Jon Reed – diginomica https://diginomica.com

June 29, 2026 at 01:42PM

<img src='https://diginomica.com/sites/default/files/images/2015-08/Fotolia-adrenalinapura-81858846_Sub_700px.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="IFTTT"/>
    <category term="Jon Reed – diginomica"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Enterprise hits and misses - AI context and real-time truth gets a debate Ford rehires humans and buyers weigh AI reults to date - by @jonerp]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-06-28:468fd8b78f817e0f6980c4b9af58539e</id>
    <updated>2026-06-28T16:57:19-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[How companies can strengthen their geopolitical risk readiness]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTG1Kn" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/risk/our%20insights/how%20companies%20can%20strengthen%20their%20geopolitical%20risk%20readiness/closing%20the%20capability%20gap-2256610600-thumb-1536x1536.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/risk/our%20insights/how%20companies%20can%20strengthen%20their%20geopolitical%20risk%20readiness/closing%20the%20capability%20gap-2256610600-thumb-1536x1536.jpg?mw=677&car=42:25" /><br/>"Despite this, risk readiness remains low. Fewer than one-third of respondents consider their geopolitical risk management capabilities mature (Exhibit 2), and just 28 percent rate them as effective at supporting decision-making. Among the most cited capability gaps were the lack of early warning systems and insufficient geopolitical intelligence gathering. Notably, few leaders view their existing risk response capabilities as either “ineffective” or “very effective,” suggesting that few companies are positioned to anticipate shocks or seize the opportunities that may emerge during geopolitical disruptions."

<img src='https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/risk/our%20insights/how%20companies%20can%20strengthen%20their%20geopolitical%20risk%20readiness/closing%20the%20capability%20gap-2256610600-thumb-1536x1536.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[How companies can strengthen their geopolitical risk readiness]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-06-28:591aea5f74894b024edc72dcd68ff04d</id>
    <updated>2026-06-28T16:57:19-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Vibe slop is the symptom. Context debt is the disease.]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTG1Km" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://cdn.thenewstack.io/media/2026/06/0a19e99a-joshua-reddekopp-ipdsi8elxng-unsplash-scaled.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://cdn.thenewstack.io/media/2026/06/0a19e99a-joshua-reddekopp-ipdsi8elxng-unsplash-scaled.jpg" /><br/>"This matters more at scale. The largest Context Graphs Postman mapped run well exceeded anything a senior engineer could hold in their head, Asthana told me. They mapped more than 1,100 APIs at a major U.S. telecom, more than 2,600 at a global telecom, and over 11,000 at one large tech company.

Postman has been running the agents on its own engineering team and has shared some data with me. APIs touch 68% of the company’s pull request traffic, Asthana tells The New Stack, and Postman runs the AI Engineer across the API-related work. The most consequential catch so far, he said, was a set of downstream dependency changes that likely would have cleared review but failed in production."

<img src='https://cdn.thenewstack.io/media/2026/06/0a19e99a-joshua-reddekopp-ipdsi8elxng-unsplash-scaled.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="ai engineering"/>
    <category term="api management"/>
    <category term="vibe coding"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Vibe slop is the symptom. Context debt is the disease.]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-06-28:ce3c01640e25f856cf9ecfb179b97782</id>
    <updated>2026-06-28T16:57:19-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[OpenAI staggers AI model release after Trump administration request]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTG1Kl" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/c2db30c2688cafcce0ba559cce4044d8aa395fcb/639_0_5033_4024/master/5033.jpg?width=1200&amp;height=630&amp;quality=85&amp;auto=format&amp;fit=crop&amp;precrop=40:21,offset-x50,offset-y0&amp;overlay-align=bottom%2Cleft&amp;overlay-width=100p&amp;overlay-base64=L2ltZy9zdGF0aWMvb3ZlcmxheXMvdGctZGVmYXVsdC5wbmc&amp;enable=upscale&amp;s=5a6149264fb9342b629e80d6a426ad23" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/c2db30c2688cafcce0ba559cce4044d8aa395fcb/639_0_5033_4024/master/5033.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&precrop=40:21,offset-x50,offset-y0&overlay-align=bottom%2Cleft&overlay-width=100p&overlay-base64=L2ltZy9zdGF0aWMvb3ZlcmxheXMvdGctZGVmYXVsdC5wbmc&s=6ef092e05f2e27fdf6d142b81e83c49e" /><br/>"“As part of our ongoing engagement with the US government, we previewed our plans and the models’ capabilities ahead of today’s launch,” OpenAI wrote in a blog post. “At their request, we are starting with a limited preview for a small group of trusted partners whose participation has been shared with the government, before releasing more broadly.”

Anthropic, OpenAI’s close rival, had carried out a similar release programme for its Mythos model but has now pulled the technology entirely after the US government ordered the company to stop foreign nationals from accessing public versions of the model, which has powerful cyber-hacking capabilities. Anthropic had at first delayed the widespread release of Mythos voluntarily but OpenAI appears to have done so at the federal government’s behest.

Stating its disquiet with the US government approach, it said: “We don’t believe this kind of government access process should become the long-term default.”

<img src='https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/c2db30c2688cafcce0ba559cce4044d8aa395fcb/639_0_5033_4024/master/5033.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&precrop=40:21,offset-x50,offset-y0&overlay-align=bottom%2Cleft&overlay-width=100p&overlay-base64=L2ltZy9zdGF0aWMvb3ZlcmxheXMvdGctZGVmYXVsdC5wbmc&enable=upscale&s=5a6149264fb9342b629e80d6a426ad23' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[OpenAI staggers AI model release after Trump administration request]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-06-28:e4bb2f00ccbf0bd60a4a77e4e432cd94</id>
    <updated>2026-06-28T16:57:18-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[12.7% of EDR-managed devices missed every security agent. 5 checks before autonomous SOC agents go live. - by @louiscolumbus]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTG1Kk" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/6i1AXzJrBmm5vHORb2EnjQ/c51ee7dc067b682eb5ed97250025fb13/HERO_FOR_ARTICLE.jpg?w=800&amp;q=75" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/6i1AXzJrBmm5vHORb2EnjQ/c51ee7dc067b682eb5ed97250025fb13/HERO_FOR_ARTICLE.jpg?w=800&q=75" /><br/>"The CSA’s Agentic Trust Framework requires that any agent promoted to a higher autonomy level must pass five gates, including demonstrated accuracy and a security audit. The EU AI Act’s Article 50 transparency obligations take effect August 2, 2026. The May 2026 Digital Omnibus pushed high-risk system obligations to December 2027, but organizations deploying agentic SOC agents on incomplete asset data face immediate operational risk that outpaces any regulatory timeline."

<img src='https://images.ctfassets.net/jdtwqhzvc2n1/6i1AXzJrBmm5vHORb2EnjQ/c51ee7dc067b682eb5ed97250025fb13/HERO_FOR_ARTICLE.jpg?w=800&q=75' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[12.7% of EDR-managed devices missed every security agent. 5 checks before autonomous SOC agents go live. - by @louiscolumbus]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-06-28:323387cd9e286d3afbccfa514df2f291</id>
    <updated>2026-06-28T16:57:18-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Here’s what we learned about AI projects from enterprise buyers so far - by @ldignan]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTG1Kj" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/06/screenshot_2026-06-28_071623.png.webp?itok=ZF3sRUDd" rel="enclosure" type="image/webp"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/06/screenshot_2026-06-28_071623.png.webp?itok=ZF3sRUDd" /><br/>"AI value has replaced the AI sizzle reel. Winning AI use cases are driven by processes and removing friction inside of the enterprise. Think supply chain, forecasting, scheduling, maintenance, inventory and all of those backend workflows.

Start with the operational pain points and deliver outcomes.

Customer facing AI still matters and garners its share of attention, but the returns so far have been about the workflows behind the scenes where AI can remove cost, time, errors and friction."

<img src='https://www.constellationr.com/sites/default/files/styles/1080wide/public/media/image/2026/06/screenshot_2026-06-28_071623.png.webp?itok=ZF3sRUDd' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Here’s what we learned about AI projects from enterprise buyers so far - by @ldignan]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-06-28:1c442ab27be6988096307beffacfa3e5</id>
    <updated>2026-06-28T16:57:17-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[The AI balloon is bursting and services must be ready to pick up the pieces - via @hfsresearch]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTG1Kh" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://www.horsesforsources.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Featured-Image-1.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://www.horsesforsources.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Featured-Image.jpg" /><br/>"Wall Street has drawn a remarkably clear line between winners and losers, with AI-native companies representing the future and traditional IT services firms increasingly seen as part of the past. One side now commands price-to-sales multiples of 60x to 100x, while the other is steadily drifting towards 1x as investors bet that AI will replace the labor-intensive services model that has dominated enterprise technology for the last three decades.

The problem with that narrative is that it only works if enterprises can actually deploy AI at scale, and today they simply cannot. Until organizations resolve their technology, data, process, and talent debt, AI will remain trapped in pilots and proofs of concept rather than fundamentally changing how businesses operate, which means the AI balloon won’t burst because the models fail, but because enterprise adoption never catches up with the expectations already baked into today’s valuations."

<img src='https://www.horsesforsources.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Featured-Image-1.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="agentic ai"/>
    <category term="agi"/>
    <category term="ai layoffs"/>
    <category term="artificial intelligence"/>
    <category term="economy"/>
    <category term="accenture"/>
    <category term="agentic"/>
    <category term="ai"/>
    <category term="aibubble"/>
    <category term="antropic"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[The AI balloon is bursting and services must be ready to pick up the pieces - via @hfsresearch]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-06-28:2f74fa833893d0352f6d6297bb4418b8</id>
    <updated>2026-06-28T16:57:17-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Your AI Stack Has a Geopolitical Risk. Your Board Doesn’t Know It Yet. - by @vijayasankarv]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTG1Kg" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://andvijaysays.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/0f138751-de2f-49c2-9f6a-08fb00484d9a-55740-0000084586fdf14d_file.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://andvijaysays.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/0f138751-de2f-49c2-9f6a-08fb00484d9a-55740-0000084586fdf14d_file.jpg" /><br/>"For U.S.-headquartered enterprises: The regulatory line has been drawn at the computational threshold of 10 to the power of 26 floating-point operations, the statutory boundary establishing a system as a frontier model under California’s Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (SB 53). Developers generating more than 500 million dollars in annual gross revenue face the most intensive obligations under the Act: they must publish annual catastrophic risk frameworks and report critical safety incidents to state emergency agencies within 15 days of discovery, shortened to 24 hours if the incident poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical injury."

<img src='https://andvijaysays.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/0f138751-de2f-49c2-9f6a-08fb00484d9a-55740-0000084586fdf14d_file.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="uncategorized"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Your AI Stack Has a Geopolitical Risk. Your Board Doesn’t Know It Yet. - by @vijayasankarv]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-06-28:acfdd44f3c9af74aa7af76d30e9b7258</id>
    <updated>2026-06-28T16:57:17-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Stop Choosing Between MCP and CLIs. Build a Harness That Makes Transport Boring. - by @vijayasankarv]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTG1Kf" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://andvijaysays.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/7f2dbf05-62f0-4cc7-821b-2f97756c30b1-25595-000008061dd92559_file.jpg" rel="enclosure" type="image/jpeg"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://andvijaysays.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/7f2dbf05-62f0-4cc7-821b-2f97756c30b1-25595-000008061dd92559_file.jpg" /><br/>"The concept is simple to state. Your orchestration layer accepts any capability format, normalizes it, and hands the model a unified tool catalog. MCP server, OpenAPI spec, GraphQL endpoint, REST API, shell script: the harness ingests all of it. The agent never knows or cares what’s executing underneath.

Building it well is a serious engineering investment, and I want to be honest about that because most writing on this topic glosses over the cost. If your team is early-stage and running a handful of integrations, the wrong move is to build this now. Use whatever is fastest. But if you are building foundational enterprise infrastructure, this is not a premature optimization. Even if frontier model context windows become effectively infinite or native tool execution improves, a regulated enterprise can never allow an LLM to directly execute unaudited, non-rate-limited system calls. This abstraction layer isn’t for the model. It’s for the engineers who have to govern the platform. You pay for the abstraction either way. The question is whether you design it or inherit it.

There are five concrete engineering problems the harness has to solve. Each one has a failure mode that bites in production and doesn’t announce itself clearly in a local development environment."

<img src='https://andvijaysays.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/7f2dbf05-62f0-4cc7-821b-2f97756c30b1-25595-000008061dd92559_file.jpg' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <category term="uncategorized"/>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Stop Choosing Between MCP and CLIs. Build a Harness That Makes Transport Boring. - by @vijayasankarv]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-06-28:ec63989aff42a031cb2a769af0397e28</id>
    <updated>2026-06-28T16:57:16-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Ford rehired 350 engineers to fix what its AI systems got wrong]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTG1KN" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="https://media.thenextweb.com/2026/06/ford-rehired-350-engineers-ai-quality-jd-power.avif" rel="enclosure" type="image/avif"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="https://media.thenextweb.com/2026/06/ford-rehired-350-engineers-ai-quality-jd-power.avif" /><br/>"The 350 returning engineers were tasked with mentoring junior staff, rebuilding the data pipelines that feed Ford’s AI training, and refining the automated systems they were originally supposed to be replaced by. Ford also created a dedicated 40-person software quality assurance team and added more than 100,000 AI-powered automated tests to catch edge cases and revalidate software changes late in development."

<img src='https://media.thenextweb.com/2026/06/ford-rehired-350-engineers-ai-quality-jd-power.avif' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Ford rehired 350 engineers to fix what its AI systems got wrong]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dlvr.it,2026-06-28:156abe21a6db3297342f40acf25a2961</id>
    <updated>2026-06-28T15:49:35-07:00</updated>
    <title><![CDATA[Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 Alleged Jailbreak to Generate Stack Exploits]]></title>
    <link href="http://dlvr.it/TTG0Kh" rel="alternate"/>
    <link href="http://cybersecuritynews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Anthropics-Claude-Fable-5-Jailbreak.webp" rel="enclosure" type="image/webp"/>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<img src="http://cybersecuritynews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Anthropics-Claude-Fable-5-Jailbreak.webp" /><br/>"Beyond the technical bypasses, Pliny also leaked Fable 5’s ~120,000-character system prompt to GitHub, exposing the internal framing and safety instructions Anthropic uses to govern the model’s behavior at the base level.

The incident reignites the longstanding tension between AI capability and safety containment. Anthropic’s classifier architecture routing flagged requests to a weaker fallback model rather than refusing outright was designed to reduce friction for legitimate users."

<img src='http://cybersecuritynews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Anthropics-Claude-Fable-5-Jailbreak.webp' alt='image' />]]></content>
    <source>
      <link href="https://bg.raindrop.io/rss/public/56998325" rel="alternate"/>
      <title><![CDATA[Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 Alleged Jailbreak to Generate Stack Exploits]]></title>
    </source>
  </entry>
</feed>
