Comments for grdryn http://blog.grdryn.me Not just another WordPress site Thu, 23 Aug 2012 06:26:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 grdryn_commentshttp://feedburner.google.com Comment on Fedora Java Remix – GSOC update 13 (Final) by Marek Goldmann http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/grdryn_comments/~3/z4JNS5n0wWw/ Marek Goldmann Thu, 23 Aug 2012 06:26:00 +0000 http://blog.grdryn.me/?p=377#comment-304 Awesome work Gerard! This is a great effort, hopefully we’ll continue the work to make it even better.

]]> http://blog.grdryn.me/2012/08/20/fedora-java-remix-gsoc-update-13-final/#comment-304 Comment on Fedora Java Remix – GSOC update 13 (Final) by John Himpel http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/grdryn_comments/~3/SwTIYeVNYd0/ John Himpel Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:18:34 +0000 http://blog.grdryn.me/?p=377#comment-303 Gerard, Thank you so much for your efforts during the GSOC. I have been trying to keep up with your progress by running your packages in Rawhide. Hopefully, your efforts will allow more of the Fedorans to use JBoss, Eclipse, and JBoss Tools for development and deployment.. John

]]> http://blog.grdryn.me/2012/08/20/fedora-java-remix-gsoc-update-13-final/#comment-303 Comment on Fedora Java Spin – GSOC update 12 by grdryn http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/grdryn_comments/~3/ovVEXM8LPLI/ grdryn Wed, 15 Aug 2012 01:59:48 +0000 http://blog.grdryn.me/?p=373#comment-301 Oh that’s just great, just when I was confident that all of my markup was valid.

]]> http://blog.grdryn.me/2012/08/13/fedora-java-spin-gsoc-update-12/#comment-301 Comment on Fedora Java Spin – GSOC update 12 by grdryn http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/grdryn_comments/~3/72o6FSRZFFE/ grdryn Wed, 15 Aug 2012 01:51:53 +0000 http://blog.grdryn.me/?p=373#comment-300 Thanks Dan. The srpm file is here: http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-m2e-core/1.1.0-2/eclipse-m2e-core-1.1.0-2.fc17.src.rpm

That srpm won’t build on F17, a lot more patches are needed to make that happen. If you’ve got a working rawhide or F18 install, then I’d love to hear if it works on that…I’ve been unable to get a working install to try it on!

]]> http://blog.grdryn.me/2012/08/13/fedora-java-spin-gsoc-update-12/#comment-300 Comment on Fedora Java Spin – GSOC update 12 by Dan Allen (@mojavelinux) http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/grdryn_comments/~3/iLaA6IU9quM/ Dan Allen (@mojavelinux) Mon, 13 Aug 2012 17:57:07 +0000 http://blog.grdryn.me/?p=373#comment-299 Gerard, could you post instructions for how to build the m2e package (or a link to the srpm or spec)? I can give it a try from my end and try to debug it.

]]> http://blog.grdryn.me/2012/08/13/fedora-java-spin-gsoc-update-12/#comment-299 Comment on Fedora Java Spin – GSOC update 12 by woogley googley http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/grdryn_comments/~3/BHJTtACUGz4/ woogley googley Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:20:34 +0000 http://blog.grdryn.me/?p=373#comment-298 the use of the strikethrough element has been deprecated

]]> http://blog.grdryn.me/2012/08/13/fedora-java-spin-gsoc-update-12/#comment-298 Comment on Fedora Java Spin – GSOC update 11 by grdryn http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/grdryn_comments/~3/cahxCaRLEcE/ grdryn Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:36:38 +0000 http://blog.grdryn.me/?p=369#comment-297 Thanks for the replies guys, I’m not being notified about them for some reason,so I didn’t see them until now!

Even though I’ve never personally used NetBeans, I like the sound of having all possible free and open source applications available in Fedora. Choice is very important. Saying that though, as Dan mentioned, interest is needed, and also time and effort.

Being a package maintainer is about more than just the initial packaging – there are always bugs to fix, and updates to deal with. The current active members of the Java SIG (and greater package maintaining collective in Fedora), have quite a lot on their plate at the best of times! :) Given that there doesn’t seem to be much NetBeans stuff in Fedora leads me to believe that if there are any users of it, they don’t have the time to do it. If you think you do, come join #fedora-java on freenode!

]]> http://blog.grdryn.me/2012/08/06/fedora-java-spin-gsoc-update-10/#comment-297 Comment on Fedora Java Spin – GSOC update 11 by grdryn http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/grdryn_comments/~3/GmuCiHFnu6g/ grdryn Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:13:07 +0000 http://blog.grdryn.me/?p=369#comment-296 Thanks for the reply Carlo – I didn’t see it until now (blog isn’t notifying me of comments for some reason).

Yeah, he worked some magic again this week and fixed the maven-model version issue for good it seems. I’m not at all sure what he actually did, it might be exactly what you suggested!

]]> http://blog.grdryn.me/2012/08/06/fedora-java-spin-gsoc-update-10/#comment-296 Comment on Fedora Java Spin – GSOC update 11 by Dan Allen (@mojavelinux) http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/grdryn_comments/~3/P-Oen1WSGyk/ Dan Allen (@mojavelinux) Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:03:26 +0000 http://blog.grdryn.me/?p=369#comment-295 Leif,

I’d like to see NetBeans in Fedora 17 (or 18) as well. All we need is some folks interested in packaging it, and it will be moving forward again. Are you interested or do you know anyone who is? As Gerard has demonstrated, the Fedora Java SIG is super helpful, so whoever packages it won’t have to go at it all alone.

-Dan

]]> http://blog.grdryn.me/2012/08/06/fedora-java-spin-gsoc-update-10/#comment-295 Comment on Fedora Java Spin – GSOC update 11 by Carlo de Wolf (@wolfc71) http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/grdryn_comments/~3/58lwfXURoIo/ Carlo de Wolf (@wolfc71) Thu, 09 Aug 2012 06:59:39 +0000 http://blog.grdryn.me/?p=369#comment-294 Stan implemented explicit version usage some time back, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757732

Maybe repackaging maven to have a softlink with an explicit version point to the correct artifacts will allow you to skip the depmap work-around?

]]> http://blog.grdryn.me/2012/08/06/fedora-java-spin-gsoc-update-10/#comment-294